Influence of erythropoietin on microvesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells protecting renal function of chronic kidney disease
© Wang et al. 2015
Received: 5 June 2014
Accepted: 12 May 2015
Published: 22 May 2015
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play a central role in the remediation of cell and tissue damage. Erythropoietin (EPO) may enhance the beneficial influence of MSCs during recovery from tissue and organ injuries. Microvesicles (MVs) released from MSCs contribute to the restoration of kidney damage. We studied the influence of EPO on MVs derived from MSCs, and the protective effects of these factors in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
The MVs derived from untreated MSCs (MSC-MVs) or from MSCs incubated in different concentrations of EPO (1, 10, 100, and 500 IU/ml EPO-MVs) were used to treat renal injury of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) in vivo, and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)-induced fibrosis in a human renal proximal tubular epithelial (HK2) cell line in vitro. Western blot and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses were used to evaluate the expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers in the renal tissue and HK2 cells. Flow cytometry was used to assess apoptosis within the HK2 cells, and microRNA (miRNA) microarray assays were used to determine the expression profiles of miRNA in the MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs.
Compared to MSC-MVs (untreated), there was a significant increase in the number of EPO-MVs derived from MSCs treated with 1–100 IU/ml EPO, and these EPO-MVs had a greater benefit in UUO mice on days 7 and 14. Moreover, the EPO-MVs had a better restorative effect following TGF-β1-induced fibrosis in HK2 cells at 24 h and 48 h. The flow cytometry results revealed that both types of MVs, especially EPO-MVs, play an important anti-apoptotic role in HK2 cells treated with TGF-β1. The miRNA profiles of the MVs revealed that EPO-MVs changed 212 miRNAs (fold-change ≥ 1.5), including miR-299, miR-499, miR-302, and miRNA-200, and that 70.28 % of these changes involved upregulation. The changed miRNA in EPO-MVs may have contributed to their enhanced protective effects following renal injury compared to MSC-MVs.
There was a dose-dependent increase in the level of EPO-MVs within the range of 1–100 IU/ml EPO. Although both MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs protect the kidney from fibrosis-related damage, there is a superior effect of EPO-MVs.
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), also known as multipotent MSCs, offer a number of potentially exciting effects for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several in vitro studies have suggested that MSCs may incorporate into the renal parenchyma, trans-differentiate into new renal tubular cells, and then expand in a straightforward fashion [1–3]. However, in addition to the ability of MSCs to differentiate in the kidney, the beneficial effects of these factors in the cells of injured tissues have also been attributed to their paracrine effects, which indirectly improve renal function via the reduction of disease-related inflammation and fibrosis [4–6]. Accordingly, the paracrine effects of MSCs have recently received more attention for their potential therapeutic effects in CKD patients.
As a one-of-a-kind paracrine factor derived from MSCs, microvesicles (MVs) have been described as a new mode of cell-to-cell communication . MVs interact with target cells via surface-expressed ligands, and act to transfer surface receptors and deliver proteins, messenger RNA (mRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and bioactive lipids. MVs that develop from bone-derived MSCs accelerate recovery following acute kidney injury (AKI) induced by toxic agents [8, 9] or ischemia–reperfusion , and induce functional improvements in patients with CKD  via miRNA- and mRNA-dependent mechanisms. Because MVs are a paracrine factor, one advantage they have over MSCs is the avoidance of possible long-term maldifferentiation of engrafted cells or tumor generation. In addition, in high concentrations under highly homogeneous preparation conditions, MVs provide focused stimulation that allows for their interaction with target cells and, in turn, positive reparative effects on damaged organs .
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone that stimulates the formation and differentiation of erythroid precursor cells in bone marrow via the EPO receptor (EpoR). An increasing amount of evidence has demonstrated that other cell types, including neurons, endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, and renal tubular cells, also express EpoR and respond to EPO treatment ; these findings expand the potential biological roles of EPO beyond erythropoiesis. The majority of in vivo and in vitro experimental studies have shown that EPO protects against acute tissue injury in the brain, heart, and kidney via the activation of relevant signaling pathways that prevent apoptosis and/or stimulate reparative proliferation in the cells of injured tissue [14–17].
Bone marrow-derived cells, both MSCs and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), express EpoR and/or mediate the proliferation of cells following EPO treatment [18, 19]. Mice MSCs express EpoRs, and the in vitro application of EPO to these cells prevents apoptotic cell death, whereas its in vivo administration increases the number of MSCs in the bone marrow and spleen . Based on these findings, we investigated the influence of EPO on MVs derived from MSCs (EPO-MVs), and the protective effects of these factors in an in vivo mouse model of CKD. In addition, in vitro experiments were conducted to assess the miRNA expression profile in EPO-MVs that may be responsible for the enhanced effectiveness of this paracrine factor in protecting renal function. This expression was compared to the miRNA expression of MSC-derived MVs (MSC-MVs).
Isolation of mMSC and incubation with EPO
The mice primary bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) were obtained from four-week-old male C57BL/6 mice, cultured and characterized as previously described . The extracted MSCs were cultured to the P3 generation. Then, purified P3-mMSCs were grown under different conditions on six-well culture plates with 105 cells/well: group A (control group), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12) with 10 % fetal bovine serum and 2 % penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone Labs, Logan, UT, USA); group B (different concentrations of the EPO incubation group): Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12) with 10 % fetal bovine serum and 2 % penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone Labs) plus different concentrations of EPO (1, 10, 100 and 500 IU/ml for each subgroup, respectively) (Gibco, Frederick, BRL Co. Ltd., MD, USA). Each group was incubated for two days. The extracted cells of group A and group B were identified according to their characteristic of osteogenesis and adipogenesis properties and were also detected using flow cytometry.
Isolation of MVs and EPO-MVs
The culture medium of each group was collected each time the medium was replaced and then stored at −80 °C to be centrifuged together at 3,000 g for 20 minutes. The free-cell debris supernatants were centrifuged at 100,000 g (Beckman Coulter, Irvine, CA, USA, Optima L-90 K ultra- centrifuge) for 1 h at 4 °C, washed in serum-free medium 199 (M199) containing N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) 25 mM (Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai),SHANGHAI, CHINA), ultracentrifuged a second time under the same conditions, and then resuspended with M199. The protein content of MVs from the control group and EPO incubation groups were quantified using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The culture and experimental treatement of HK2
Human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells HK2 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in Medium 199 powder (Invitrogen, Frederick, MD, USA) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Burlington, Canada) and 2 % penicillin/ streptomycin (Hyclone Labs). The cells were seeded for 3–4 days at 37 °C in 95 % air–5 % CO2, then trypsinized by 0.25 % trypsin-EDTA (Gibco BRL Co. Ltd.). Cells were growth-arrested in serum-free medium over night before use in experiments. The cells used in this experiment were at passages 10–15. HK2 cells were incubated with recombinant human transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) (R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA) (6 ng/ml) for 48 h and 72 h to induce fibrosis with MVs (30 μg) or EPO-MVs (30 μg) treatment.
The Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Invitrogen) was used to detect apoptotic cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were gently washed with PBS and collected using trypsinization, disaggregated to a single cell suspension and incubated with 5 μl of Annexin V-FITC and 10 μl of a PI solution for 15 minutes in the dark. The apoptotic cells were detected using flow cytometry (BD, San Diego, CA, USA), then quantified and the percentage of apoptotic cells measured.
Animal treatments and surgical methods
Animal welfare and experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology of China, 2006), and were approved by the animal ethics committee of Nanjing Medical University. Healthy specific pathogen-free (SPF) purpose-bred domestic C57BL/6 mice (6-weeks-old, 15–23 g body weight) were obtained from the Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China. Animals had ad libitum access to rodent diet and tap water. The mice were kept in cages with a 12:12-h light–dark cycle, a temperature of 21 °C ±2 °C, and a humidity of 55 % ±5 %.
Mice assigned to the unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model were anesthetized by tiletamine/zolazepam (VIRBAC Laboratories, Carros, France) and placed on a heating pad to maintain their temperature at 37 °C. Left ureters were ligated with silk (4/0). Amoxicillin was given to the animals after surgery for three days. Sham animals underwent the same procedure, except that the ureter was not ligated. The animals were randomly divided into four groups: sham group (n = 10), UUO group (n = 10), UUO + MVs group (n = 10), and UUO + EPO-MVs group (n = 10). The mice were injected in the tail vein with MVs or EPO-MVs (30 μg/mouse) one day after surgery The four groups were killed at 7 days and 14 days after UUO.
Blood and urine were collected before the mice were killed and serum levels of urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Scr), and urine levels of protein were examined using a Beckman Analyser II (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA).
Renal immunostaining and histological analysis
After the mice were killed, the kidneys were fixed in 4 % neutral-buffered paraformaldehyde for histological assessment, embedded in paraffin and cut at 3 μm-thick. Then, the sections were dewaxed using standard sequential techniques before Masson’s trichrome (MT) and hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. Damage was assessed as in previous studies [20, 21]. The degree of tubular cell damage was scored by a pathologist, in a single-blind manner, using the numerical Histological Score of Kidney (HSK): 0, no damage; 1, unicellular, patchy isolated necrosis; 2, tubular necrosis less than 25 %; 3, tubular necrosis between 25 % and 50 %; 4, more than 50 % tubular necrosis and presence of infarcted tissue .
The sections previously prepared for immunohistochemistry were incubated with primary antibody E-cadherin (1: 800, Bioworld, Louis Park, MN, USA) and α-SMA antibody (1 μg/ml, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocols. After washing, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody, anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA) at a 1:5000 dilution. Finally, sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, dehydrated, and observed.
Protein was extracted from kidney tissue and cultured cells. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method. Then, 40 μg of the extracted protein was electrophoresed on 10 % SDS polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). After blocking for 2 h at 4 °C in blocking buffer (10 % fat-free milk TBS with 0.1 %Tween 20), the membrane was incubated overnight with anti-E-cadherin (1:800, Bio-world), anti-α-SMA (1 μg/ml, Abcam), and anti-β-tubulin (1: 5000, Bio-world). The membrane was washed and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody. Detection was performed using enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific, Frederick, MD, USA) and photography.
Reverse transcription and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from MVs and HK2 cells according to the Trizol (Invitrogen) manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was synthesized using the Takara SYBR®PrimeScriptTM miRNA RT-PCR Kit and the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Shiga, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a SYBR PrimeScript miRNA RT-PCR Kit and SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (Tli RNaseH Plus) (Takara) with the intron-spanning primers on ABI-Prism-7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Frederick, MD, USA). The sequences of the PCR primers of mRNA are: a-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) –forward -TGTGCTGGACTCTGGAGATG, reverse-ATGTCACGGACAATCTCACG; E-caderin-forward-AGAAGACGCTGAGCATGTGA, reverse-TGGATCCAAGATGGTGATGA; β-actin-forwad-TAAAGACCTCTATGCCAACACAGT, reverse-CACGATGGAGGGGCCGGACTCATC.
MicroRNA profiling arrays of MV and EPO-MV
To study the differential miRNA expression in MV and EPO-MV, we performed miRNA expression profiling of the culture supernatant of MSC with or without EPO incubation using the miRCURY LNA Array (v.18.0) (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark). RNA samples were labeled with the Exiqon miRCURY Hy3/Hy5 power labeling kit and hybridized on the miRCURY LNA Array (version 18.0) station. Scanning was performed with the Axon GenePix 4000B microarray scanner. GenePix pro version 6.0 was used to read image raw intensity. Replicated miRNAs were averaged and miRNAs at intensities ≥ 30 in all samples were chosen for calculating the normalization factor. Expressed data were normalized using the median normalization. After normalization, differentially expressed miRNAs were identified through fold change filtering. The microarray data were deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public repository and are accessible under GEO Series accession number GSE68665.
Results from three independent experiments were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS 17.0. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
The characterization of EPO-treated MSCs and MVs
Marrow stromal cells are often referred to as MSCs due to their ability to differentiate into mesenchymal cell types . This cellular feature distinguishes MSCs from hematopoietic cells and other end-differentiated somatic and progenitor cells that also reside in bone marrow. To verify whether the mesenchymal differentiation capability of the MSCs would change following incubation in EPO, the EPO-treated MSCs were exposed in vitro to specific agents that induce osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation. As shown in Fig. 2c, following exposure to β-glycerol phosphate, ascorbic acid 2-phosphate, and dexamethasone, the undifferentiated cells developed an osteogenic phenotype, whereas after exposure to insulin, dexamethasone, 3-isobutyl-methylxanthine, and indomethacin, the cells manifested an adipogenic phenotype.
MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs reversed TGF-β1-induced morphological changes in HK2 cells
MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs restored the TGF-β1-induced changes in the expression of E-cadherin and α-SMA in HK2 cells
The protein levels of E-cadherin and α-SMA, as revealed by Western blot and RT-PCR analyses, showed that both types of MVs restored the TGF-β1-induced changes in E-cadherin and α-SMA in HK2 cells at 48 h and 72 h. However, EPO-MVs exerted a greater reparative influence than MSC-MVs (Fig. 4b).
MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs inhibited apoptosis in TGF-β1-treated HK2 cells
MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs protected against unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO)-induced CKD
All subjects in the experimental group survived, and the body weight of each subject was recorded every 3 days until the time of sacrifice. There were no significant differences in body weight observed among the groups (data not shown).
An assessment of these changes was made using the histological score of kidney (HSK). The kidneys of UUO mice had a score of 2.85 ± 1.0 on day 7 and a score of 3.75 ± 0.5 on day 14, but treatment with both types of MVs restored the morphology of the kidney. Treatment with MSC-MVs resulted in a score of 1.75 ± 0.5 on day 7 and a score of 2.0 ± 0.57 on day 14, whereas treatment with EPO-MVs resulted in a score of 1.17 ± 0.3 on day 7 and a score of 1.16 ± 0.6 on day 14. Each of these scores was statistically significant compared to vehicle-treated UUO subjects (p < 0.05).
Following the UUO procedure, Masson’s trichrome staining revealed a time-dependent increase in extracellular matrix depositions within the tubulointerstitium in which the fibrosis was more severe on day 14. However, both types of MVs resulted in a significant reduction of extracellular matrix deposition in UUO mice, which was greater in the kidneys of mice treated with EPO-MVs (Fig. 6b). An immunohistochemical assessment of α-SMA, a marker of myofibroblasts, demonstrated that there was a time-dependent increase in α-SMA-positive areas in the obstructed kidneys after the UUO procedure. However, the administration of both types of MVs, especially EPO-MVs, resulted in a significant decrease in the α-SMA-positive areas compared to UUO mice on days 7 and 14. On the other hand, E-cadherin, a normal epithelial marker, was markedly reduced in UUO mice. E-cadherin levels were preserved by administration of both types of MVs, especially EPO-MVs (Fig. 6c).
Expression of α-SMA and E-cadherin in mice kidneys
Changes in the miRNA profiles of MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs
In recent years, MSCs have received an increasing amount of attention in the field of regenerative medicine because they possess a number of potential therapeutic applications for patients with acute and chronic tissue injury in organs such as the heart, kidneys, lungs and liver. In fact, MSCs are now used in clinical trials to treat a wide range of diseases . Although MSCs have multiple differentiation potentialities and migrate to injured sites following systemic administration, several recent studies have indicated that the differentiation of MSCs in the cells of injured tissues has little therapeutic benefit [5, 25, 26]. In fact, a large amount of evidence indicates that the therapeutic effects of MSCs are dependent on their paracrine functions, which allow for the secretion of soluble factors that repair damaged tissues [27–29]. For example, MVs released from MSCs are known to contribute to tissue repair in various animal models of injury [11, 30, 31].
MVs are defined as a vesicle population that is a mixture of exosomes and shedding vesicles that can be detected both in vitro and in vivo. These factors are instrumental in cell-to-cell communication, the interaction with cells via specific receptor–ligand interactions, and the transfer of surface receptors, proteins, and bioactive lipids to target cells after internalization . In addition, MVs contain selected mRNA and miRNA profiles, and aid in the exchange of genetic information between cells [32–34]. MSCs release a significant amount of MVs with mRNA and selected patterns of mature miRNAs that protect against acute and chronic kidney disease [10, 11, 20]. In contrast to MSCs, MVs transfer complex and biologically active substances derived from MSCs to injured cells that favor tissue regeneration . The repeated administration of allogeneic MVs that are derived from MSCs may not involve the immune response, as they do not express histocompatibility antigens.
Along with stem cell-based therapy, EPO has recently been evaluated for the treatment of tissue injury due to its novel pharmacological effects, because in addition to its recognized erythropoietic function, EPO may protect tissues against various types of damage . EPO enhances regeneration of the tubular epithelium via its anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory features , prevents acute kidney injury (AKI), and improves postoperative renal function when administered in a preventive fashion . Several studies have reported that EPO enhances the ability of MSCs to treat renal and heart injuries [38, 39]. Based on such findings, the present study investigated the influence of MVs derived from EPO-treated MSCs, and evaluated the renal protective function of this type of MV following chronic injury both in vivo and in vitro.
Recent studies have shown that EPO regulates the formation of red blood cells and the proliferation of EPCs , gastric epithelial cells , and other non-hematopoietic cells that express EpoRs. Using the Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), we found that the level of MVs secreted from MSCs increased in a significant and dose-dependent manner when treated with EPO concentrations between 1–100 IU/ml (Fig. 1). However, light microscopy data indicated that 500 IU/ml EPO resulted in the obvious death of MSCs, and that there was a marked decrease in the optical density (OD) of the group receiving this dose of EPO (see Additional file 1). Based on these findings, it appears that the significant and dose-dependent EPO-induced increase in MVs can be attributed to the proliferation of MSCs.
Our findings demonstrate that, although both types of MVs had a beneficial effect, the influence of EPO-MVs was considerably stronger than those of MSC-MVs. According to the blood and urine examinations of UUO mice that received MVs 1 day after surgery, the serum levels of BUN in UUO mice exhibited a marked decrease following both MSC-MV (p < 0.01) and EPO-MV (p < 0.01) administration, but there was a stronger effect of EPO-MVs on days 7 and 14 (p < 0.05). In addition, both types of MVs significantly reduced the serum creatinine levels of UUO mice compared to vehicle-treated UUO mice (p < 0.01), but the difference in serum creatinine levels between the EPO-MV and MSC-MV groups was not statistically significant. Similarly, both types of MVs markedly reduced the elevated levels of proteinuria in UUO mice on days 7 and 14, but EPO-MVs had a stronger effect (data not shown).
The kidney sections of UUO mice treated with MVs that were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson’s trichrome demonstrated a relatively preserved cytoarchitecture, and a reduction of the histological features of renal injury. However, the mice treated with EPO-MVs displayed fewer interstitial lymphocyte infiltrates, less tubular swelling, less necrosis, and lower levels of interstitial collagen deposition over time. These findings indicate that a higher number of E-cadherin-positive and a lower number of α-SMA-positive cells were detected in the renal tubules and capillaries of mice treated with EPO-MVs compared to mice treated with MSC-MVs. The in vitro experiments further supported the beneficial effects of treatment with MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs. Both types of MVs reversed the TGF-β1-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in HK2 cells and inhibited the apoptosis of TGF-β1-treated HK2 cells. Once again, EPO-MVs had a stronger effect than MSC-MVs.
A previous study from our group found that MVs ameliorated the renal damage observed in five of six nephrectomized mice and protected kidneys in the same manner as MSCs . These protective effects are likely due to the MV-controlled shuttling of particular miRNAs during renal cell regeneration. This shuttling of factors has been observed both in vivo and in vitro in association with MVs derived from EPCs that have been subjected to a knockdown of Dicer, an intracellular enzyme essential for the production of miRNA . In addition, clinical and experimental studies have provided data that support a critical role for miRNAs in renal pathophysiology. In a mouse model of diabetic nephropathy, inhibition of miR-21 improved kidney function and alleviated the progression of renal injury , whereas inhibition of renal miR-192 suppressed the expression of fibrotic markers, such as collagen, TGF-β1, and fibronectin in a mouse model of type I diabetes nephropathy .
To explain the improved reparative effects associated with MVs observed in the present study, a miRCURY™ LNA Array was conducted to assess whether the incubation of cells in EPO changes the expression of miRNAs in MVs. The present findings demonstrate that greater numbers of miRNAs (70.28 %) were upregulated in EPO-MVs. Several recent reports have described miRNA functions and their role in anti-fibrosis. miR-302 decreases TGF-β1-induced EMT in renal HKC8 epithelial cells and attenuates the TGF-β1-induced mesangial production of fibronectin and thrombospondin . In vitro studies have demonstrated that members of the miRNA-200 family inhibit the E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2, which are implicated in EMT . miR-299 may delay or protect against replicative senescence via improvements in the metabolic activity of senesced cells, but it does not stimulate growth in the remaining senescent cells . miR-499 plays an inhibitory role in the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway, and protects against H2O2-induced injury in cardiomyocytes . Our findings also demonstrate that miR-299, miR-499, miR-302, and miRNA-200 were upregulated in EPO-MVs (Fig. 8c). Thus, it is likely that the changes in these miRNAs in EPO-MVs contributed to the enhanced inhibition of TGF-β1-induced EMT, decreased levels of apoptosis in the proximal tubular epithelial cells, and improved renal function in UUO mice.
There were several limitations in the present study. Therefore, further investigation regarding the role of upregulated miRNAs in EPO-MVs is required to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying MSC-induced renal protection. Nevertheless, these findings will help guide future research in this area.
The MSCs were cultured in normal 10 % FBS, and then the MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs were collected. The process of isolating and collecting MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs was the same, and, therefore, the influence of FBS on MSC-MVs and EPO-MVs was not only similar, but mitigated to some extent, which allowed for a comparison of their reparative effects on CKD.
Our findings suggest that there was a dose-dependent increase in the level of EPO-MVs within the range of 1–100 IU/ml EPO, the EPO-MVs had a greater benefit in UUO mice and had a better restorative effect following TGF-β1-induced fibrosis in HK2 cells. The changed miRNA in EPO-MVs may have contributed to their enhanced protective effects following renal injury compared to MSC-MVs. Our findings may help to develop new therapeutic MVs to CKD caused by renal fibrosis in further work.
acute kidney injury
one-way analysis of variance
chronic kidney disease
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium nutrient mixture F-12
endothelial progenitor cells
microvesicles derived from MSCs incubated with EPO
human renal proximal tubular epithelial cell
Histological Score of Kidney
microvesicles derived from MSCs
mesenchymal stem cells
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
transforming growth factor-β1
unilateral ureteral obstruction
α- smooth muscle actin
This work was supported by grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China 2013CB530803, the National Natural Science Foundation of China H0511-81070588 and H0511-81370843, Innovation of Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Fund of Jiangsu Province BL2012066, a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions JX10231801.
- Choi SJ, Kim JK, Hwang SD. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for chronic renal failure. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:1217–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asanuma H, Meldrum DR, Meldrum KK. Therapeutic applications of mesenchymal stem cells to repair kidney injury. J Urol. 2010;184:26–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zerbini G, Piemonti L, Maestroni A, Dell’Antonio G, Bianchi G. Stem cells and the kidney: a new therapeutic tool? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:S123–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee SR, Lee SH, Moon JY, Park JY, Lee D, Lim SJ, et al. Repeated administration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improved the protective effects on a remnant kidney model. Ren Fail. 2010;32:840–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Semedo P, Correa-Costa M, Antonio Cenedeze M, Maria-Avancini-Costa-Malheiros D, Antonia-dos-Reis M, Shimizu MH, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate renal fibrosis through immune modulation and remodeling properties in a rat remnant kidney model. Stem Cells. 2009;27:3063–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cavaglieri RC, Martini D, Sogayar MC, Noronha IL. Mesenchymal stem cells delivered at the subcapsule of the kidney ameliorate renal disease in the rat remnant kidney model. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:947–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruno S, Grange C, Collino F, Maria Chiara D, Vincenzo C, Luigi B, et al. Microvesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells enhance survival in a lethal model of acute kidney injury. PLoS One. 2012;7, e33115.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morigi M, Imberti B, Zoja C, Corna D, Tomasoni S. Mesenchymal stem cells are renotropic, helping to repair the kidney and improve function in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1794–804.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bi B, Schmitt R, Israilova M, Nishio H, Cantley LG. Stromal cells protect against acute tubular injury via an endocrine effect. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2486–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cantaluppi V, Gatti S, Medica D, Figliolini F, Bruno S, Deregibus MC, et al. Microvesicles derived from endothelial progenitor cells protect the kidney from ischemia–reperfusion injury by microRNA-dependent reprogramming of resident renal cells. Kidney Int. 2012;82:412–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gatti S, Bruno S, Deregibus MC, Sordi A, Cantaluppi V, Tetta C. Microvesicles derived from human adult mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemia reperfusion-induced acute and chronic kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1474–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tetta C, Bruno S, Fonsato V, Deregibus MC, Camussi G. The role of microvesicles in tissue repair. Organogenesis. 2011;7:105–15.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bi B, Guo J, Marlier A, Lin SR, Cantley LG. Erythropoietin expands a stromal cell population that can mediate renoprotection. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F1017–22.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartesaghi S, Marinovich M, Corsini E, Galli CL, Viviani B. Erythropoietin: a novel neuroprotective cytokine. Neurotoxicology. 2005;26:923–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharples EJ, Patel N, Brown P, Stewart K, Mota-Philipe H, Sheaff M, et al. Erythropoietin protects the kidney against the injury and dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:2115–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Junk AK, Mammis A, Savitz SI, Singh M, Roth S, Malhotra S, et al. Erythropoietin administration protects retinal neurons from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10659–64.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fishbane S, Ragolia L, Palaia T, Johnson B, Elzein H, Maesaka JK. Cytoprotection by darbepoetin/epoetin alfa in pig tubular and mouse mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 2004;65:452–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Satoh K, Kagaya Y, Nakano M, Ito Y, Ohta J, Tada H, et al. Important role of endogenous erythropoietin system in recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells in hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in mice. Circulation. 2006;113:1442–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang D, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Gao X, Li C, Ma W, et al. Erythropoietin enhances the angiogenic potency of autologous bone marrow stromal cells in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Cardiology. 2007;108:228–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He J, Wang Y, Sun S, Yu M, Wang C, Pei X, et al. Bone marrow stem cells-derived microvesicles protect against renal injury in the mouse remnant kidney model. Nephrology. 2012;17:493–500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Debeb BG, Zhang X, Krishnamurthy S, Gao H, Cohen E, Li L, et al. Characterizing cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like features in 293T human embryonic kidney cells. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:180–91.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tschöpe C, Miteva K, Schultheiss HP, Linthout SV. Mesenchymal stromal cells: a promising cell source for the treatment of inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17:3295–307.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gregory CA, Prockop DJ, Spees JL. Non-hematopoietic bone marrow stem cells: molecular control of expansion and differentiation. Exp Cell Res. 2005;306:330–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruno S, Collino F, Tetta C, Camussi G. Dissecting paracrine effectors for mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2013;129:137–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magnasco A, Corseli M, Bertelli R. Mesenchymal stem cells protective effect in adriamycin model of nephropathy. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:1157–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Togel F, Cohen A, Zhang P, Yang Y, Hu Z, Westenfelder C. Autologous and allogeneic marrow stromal cells are safe and effective for the treatment of acute kidney injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18:475–85.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alfarano C, Roubeix C, Chaaya R, Ceccaldi C, Calise D, Mias C, et al. Intraparenchymal injection of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells reduces kidney fibrosis after ischemia-reperfusion in cyclosporine-immunosuppressed rats. Cell Transplant. 2012;21:2009–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lv S, Liu G, Sun A, Wang J, Cheng J, Wang W, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate diabetic glomerular fibrosis in vivo and in vitro by inhibiting TGF-β signalling via secretion of bone morphogenetic protein 7. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2014;11:251–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ueno T, Nakashima A, Doi S, Kawamoto T, Honda K, Yokoyama Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental peritoneal fibrosis by suppressing inflammation and inhibiting TGF-β1 signaling. Kidney Int. 2013;84:297–307.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bruno S, Grange C, Deregibus MC. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1053–67.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai RC, Arslan F, Lee MM. Exosome secreted by MSC reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Stem Cell Res. 2010;4:214–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Collino F, Deregibus MC, Bruno S, Sterpone L, Aghemo G, Viltono L, et al. Microvesicles derived from adult human bone marrow and tissue specific mesenchymal stem cells shuttle selected pattern of miRNAs. PLoS One. 2010;5:11803.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deregibus MC, Cantaluppi V, Calogero R, Lo Iacono M, Tetta C, Biancone L, et al. Endothelial progenitor cell derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood. 2007;110:2440–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yuan A, Farber EL, Rapoport AL, Tejada D, Deniskin R, Akhmedov NB, et al. Transfer of microRNAs by embryonic stem cell microvesicles. PLoS One. 2009;4:4722.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rathod DB, Salahudeen AK. Nonerythropoietic properties of erythropoietin: implication for tissue protection. J Invest Med. 2011;59:1083–5.Google Scholar
- Souza AC, Volpini RA, Shimizu MH, Sanches TR, Camara NO, Semedo P, et al. Erythropoietin prevents sepsis related acute kidney injury in rats by inhibiting NF-κB and upregulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;15:1045–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song YR, Lee T, You SJ, Chin HJ, Chae DW, Lim C, et al. Prevention of acute kidney injury by erythropoietin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a pilot study. Am J Nephrol. 2009;30:253–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eliopoulos N, Gagnon RF, Francois M, Galipeau J. Erythropoietin delivery by genetically engineered bone marrow stromal cells for correction of anemia in mice with chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:1576–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ward MR, Stewart DJ. Erythropoietin and mesenchymal stromal cells in angiogenesis and myocardial regeneration: one plus one equals three? Cardiovasc Res. 2008;79:357–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- George J, Goldstein E, Abashidze A, Wexler D, Hamed S, Shmilovich H, et al. Erythropoietin promotes endothelial progenitor cell proliferative and adhesive properties in a PI3-kinase-dependent manner. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;68:299–306.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Itoh K, Sawasaki Y, Takeuchi K, Kato S, Imai N, Kato Y, et al. Erythropoietin-induced proliferation of gastric mucosal cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:234–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhong X, Chung AC, Chen HY, Dong Y, Meng XM, Li R, et al. miR-21 is a key therapeutic target for renal injury in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2013;56:663–74.
- Putta S, Lanting L, Sun G, Lawson G, Kato M, Natarajan R. Inhibiting microRNA-192 ameliorates renal fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:458–69.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Faherty N, Curran SP, O’Donovan H, Martin F, Godson C, Brazil DP, et al. CCN2/CTGF increases expression of miR-302 microRNAs, which target the TGFβ type II receptor with implications for nephropathic cell phenotypes. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:5621–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14910–4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jong HL, Mustafa MR, Vanhoutte PM, AbuBakar S, Wong PF. MicroRNA 299-3p modulates replicative senescence in endothelial cells. Physiol Genomics. 2013;45:256–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jia Z, Zhang C, Sun M, Wang W, Chen P, Ma K, et al. miR-499 protects cardiomyocytes from H 2O 2-induced apoptosis via its effects on Pdcd4 and Pacs2. RNA Biol. 2014;11:4.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.