Open Access

Mesenchymal stromal cells loaded with paclitaxel induce cytotoxic damage in glioblastoma brain xenografts

  • Simone Pacioni1, 2,
  • Quintino Giorgio D’Alessandris1,
  • Stefano Giannetti3,
  • Liliana Morgante3,
  • Ivana De Pascalis4,
  • Valentina Coccè5,
  • Arianna Bonomi5,
  • Luisa Pascucci6,
  • Giulio Alessandri7,
  • Augusto Pessina5,
  • Maria Laura Falchetti2Email author and
  • Roberto Pallini1
Contributed equally
Stem Cell Research & Therapy20156:194

DOI: 10.1186/s13287-015-0185-z

Received: 25 June 2015

Accepted: 16 September 2015

Published: 6 October 2015

Abstract

Introduction

The goal of cancer chemotherapy is targeting tumor cells and/or tumor-associated microvessels with the lowest systemic toxicity. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are promising vehicles for selective drug delivery due to their peculiar ability to home to pathological tissues. We previously showed that MSCs are able to uptake and subsequently to release the chemotherapeutic compound Paclitaxel (PTX) and to impair the growth of subcutaneous glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) xenografts. Here we used an orthotopic GBM model 1) to assess whether PTX-loaded MSCs (PTX-MSCs) retain a tropism towards the tumor cells in the brain context, and 2) to characterize the cytotoxic damage induced by MSCs-driven PTX release in the tumor microenvironment.

Methods

U87MG GBM cells were fluorescently labeled with the mCherry protein and grafted onto the brain of immunosuppressed rats. In adjacent brain regions, we injected green fluorescent protein-expressing murine MSCs, either loaded with PTX or unloaded. After 1 week survival, the xenografted brain was assessed by confocal microscopy for PTX-induced cell damage.

Results

Overall, MSCs showed remarkable tropism towards the tumor. In rats grafted with PTX-MSCs, the nuclei of U87MG cells showed changes that are typically induced by PTX, including multi-spindle mitoses, centrosome number alterations, and nuclear fragmentation. Multi-spindle mitoses resulted in multinucleated cells that were significantly higher in tumors co-grafted with PTX-MSCs than in controls. Nuclear changes did not occur in astrocytes and neurons surrounding the tumor.

Conclusions

MSCs appear particularly suited for anti-neoplastic drug delivery in the brain since PTX-specific damage of GBM cells can be achieved avoiding side effects to the normal tissue.

Introduction

The key goal of cancer chemotherapy consists of localizing the drug effect selectively to the tumor microenvironment in order to kill as many cancer cells as possible while producing the lowest collateral toxicity. To achieve this, a significant number of approaches have been investigated in the last 20 years, from the use of toxic immunoconjugates for targeting tumor specific antigens to sophisticated use of nanoparticles or manipulated stem cells for selective drug delivery [13].

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most aggressive brain tumor, is associated with invariably unfavorable prognosis in spite of extensive surgical resection, radiotherapy, and concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide [4]. Unfortunately, the efficacy of systemic therapies is limited by the blood–brain barrier. There is therefore an urgent need for new vehicles that enable local, persistent delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are adult stem cells first described by Friedenstein et al. [5] as adherent fibroblast-shaped cells in the bone marrow, capable of differentiating into bone. More recently, it has been shown that MSCs can be isolated from various tissues, such as adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood, Wharton jelly, and derma. MSCs are defined as plastic adherent cells, expressing a variety of surface markers (e.g., CD44, CD63, CD105, CD146) with the capacity for in vitro differentiation into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes.

MSCs have recently gained great interest as a therapeutic tool due to their unique biological features, including the ability to home to pathological tissues, to differentiate into various cell types, to secrete bioactive molecules stimulating recovery after tissue damage, and to play immunomodulatory roles. Due to these peculiarities, MSCs represent a great opportunity for cancer therapy. Using transgenic procedures, MSCs have been induced to secrete therapeutic cytokines or growth/inhibitory factors with the capacity to kill cancer cells, both in vitro and in vivo [3, 68]. However, genetic manipulation of MSCs in the clinical setting implies risks of pro-tumorigenic effects [9].

Paclitaxel (PTX) is a microtubule poison that arrests cells in mitosis. PTX promotes microtubule assembly and stabilization [1012], thus leading to activation of the mitotic checkpoint that arrests cells in mitosis. Low concentrations of PTX suppress the rate at which microtubules grow and shrink, without substantially increasing the microtubule polymer mass, while arresting cells in mitosis on multipolar spindles [13]. Cells arrested in mitosis can either die or undergo a process known as mitotic slippage, in which they enter the G1 phase without undergoing anaphase or cytokinesis to produce a single, tetraploid cell. Repeated mitoses in the absence of cytokinesis result in aberrant multinucleated cells eventually undergoing apoptotic death [14, 15].

In a previous work we demonstrated that MSCs without any genetic manipulation are able to uptake and subsequently to release PTX in an amount sufficient to inhibit both tumor and endothelial cell proliferation in vitro and, most importantly, to impair tumor growth in a subcutaneous GBM xenograft model [16]. In brain xenografts, Menon et al. [17] demonstrated that human MSCs possess significant tropism towards U87MG tumor cells.

In the present study we used an orthotopic GBM model to assess whether PTX-loaded MSCs retain a tropism towards the tumor cells and exert a selective anti-tumor effect in the brain environment. We found that PTX-MSCs efficiently migrated from the injection site to the tumor, showing that PTX does not affect MSC tropism toward the tumor. Notably, nearly all PTX-MSCs either penetrated into or located around the tumor. In U87MG xenografts containing PTX-MSCs, we found PTX-induced cytotoxic damage in the tumor cells, including atypical mitoses, abnormal spindles, and abnormal centrosomes, which resulted in chromosome missegregation and aberrant multinucleated cells.

Materials and methods

Cell cultures

All cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5 % carbon dioxide. The SR4987 murine stromal cell line was established from a long-term bone marrow-derived cell culture of BDF/1 mice (CRL-2028; ATCC). This cell line shows a high degree of stemness [18], expresses vimentin, CD44, CD73, CD105, CD106, Sca1, and CD34, contains 50 % of CD45+ cells, and is capable of differentiating into osteocytes and chondrocytes [18, 19]. Cells were grown in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum (Gibco by Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA) under standard conditions. U87MG GBM cells (HTB14; ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified medium (high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM); Sigma, St.Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (Gibco) under standard conditions.

Production of viral stocks and cell infections

U87MG cells expressing the red fluorescent protein mCherry (Cherry-U87MG) and SR4987 MSCs expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP-MSCs) were obtained by lentiviral transduction as described by Dull et al. [20]. Briefly, viral particles were produced in HEK 293 T cells by transient transfection using Lipofectamine reagent (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA). HEK293T were co-transfected with the lentiviral constructs, pCLLsin.PPT.hPGK.GFP.pre [20] or pLVX-mCherry-C1 (Clonetech Laboratories Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA), together with the packaging plasmids pMDL, pRSV, and VSVG. Supernatants were collected every 24 hours between 48 and 72 hours after transfection, and used in three successive rounds of infection in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene. Lentiviral infection occurred with high efficiency, as assessed by red and green fluorescence, so that no enrichment for transduced cells was required.

Loading of GFP-MSCs with PTX

GFP-MSCs were loaded with 2000 ng/ml PTX (2340 nM; Adipogen, Liestal, Switzerland), as described by Pessina et al. [16]. Briefly, cells were incubated with PTX for 24 hours. At the end of incubation, cells were trypsinized, extensively washed with Hanks Balanced salt solution (HBSS), and seeded in a new flask. After 24 hours, conditioned medium (CM) was collected and used to culture U87MG cells. Parallel cultures of U87MG cells were grown with CM from unloaded MSCs and used as controls. The amount of PTX in the CM was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography, as described previously [21].

MTS assay

The effect of CM from PTX-MSCs on U87MG cell viability was evaluated by the Cell Titer 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). U87MG cells were seeded on a 96-well plate (1500 cells/well) and cultured for 5 days in the presence of serial 1:2 dilutions of CM from PTX-MSCs or of PTX (initial concentration = 200 ng/ml). Cell viability was calculated as the ratio between the absorbance of treated and control (sham treated) U87MG cells. Mean and standard deviation values were generated from two biological replicates. Each experiment was performed at least three times. Representative results of a single experiment are shown in Additional file 1. Three independent experiments were consistent.

U87MG cell treatment with PTX

U87MG cells were seeded on glass slides and cultured in the presence of 20, 50, and 100 nM PTX for 24 hours. U87MG cells were also cultured with CM from SR4987-PTX-MSCs. As negative control, we used CM from unloaded MSCs. After 24 hours, U87MG cells were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde for fluorescence microscopy.

Immunocytochemical analysis

U87MG cells grown on coverslips were washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) and fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature (RT). Fixation was quenched by washing twice. Cells were permeabilized and blocked with PB containing 0.3 % Triton X-100, 5 % normal donkey serum (NDS), and 1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 minutes at RT in a humid chamber, and then washed and incubated in humid chamber for 2 hours at RT with primary mouse anti-α-tubulin and rabbit anti-γ-tubulin antibodies (1:250; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for staining of spindles and centrosomes respectively. Cells were washed and incubated in PB containing 5 % NDS and 1 % BSA with Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-mouse and Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:500; Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 hour at RT in humid chamber. Cells were washed, incubated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1:4000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 minutes, and washed again before mounting the coverslips with mounting medium. Visualization and acquisition of images were accomplished using a laser confocal microscope (SP5; Leica). Acquired images were analyzed with Leica Application Suite X software.

Intracranial xenografts of Cherry - U87MG cells and GFP-MSCs

Experiments involving animals were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome (Pr. No. FF22). Adult male Wistar rats (200–250 g; Catholic University Breeding Laboratory, Rome, Italy) were used. Beginning 7 days before implantation, the rats were immunosuppressed with subcutaneous injection of cyclosporine (30 mg/kg, three times per week). For cell grafting, the rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of diazepam (2 mg/100 g) followed by intramuscular injection of ketamine (4 mg/100 g). Animal skulls were immobilized in a stereotactic head frame and three burr holes were made. Two holes were made 1 mm anterior to the bregma 1.5 and 3 mm right of the midline. The third hole was 1 mm posterior to the bregma 2 mm right of the midline. The tip of a 10 μl Hamilton microsyringe was then placed at a depth of 4 mm from the dura and 2 × 105 GFP-PTX-MSCs were injected in each hole anterior to the bregma. In the hole posterior to the bregma, 2 × 105 Cherry-U87MG cells were injected at the same depth from the dura. Control animals were grafted with unloaded GFP-MSCs. An additional group of rats was grafted with 2 × 105 Cherry-U87MG cells alone. After grafting, the animals were kept under pathogen-free conditions in positive-pressure cabinets (Tecniplast Gazzada, Varese, Italy) and observed daily for neurological signs. After 1 week of survival, the rats were deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) followed by 4 % paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS.

Fluorescence microscopy and immunofluorescence of brain tumor xenografts

The brains were removed, post-fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde in PB for 3 days, and cryoprotected in PB with 30 % sucrose for 3 days. Coronal sections of the brain (40 μm thick) were blocked in PB with 10 % BSA, 0.3 % Triton X-100 for 45 minutes. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary mouse anti-α-tubulin or rabbit anti-γ-tubulin (1:250; Sigma-Aldrich) for staining of spindles and centrosomes respectively, or rabbit anti-GFAP (1:1000; Dako Italia, Milan, Italy), rabbit anti-NeuN (1:400; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), or rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:200; Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA) antibodies, identifying astrocytes, neurons, and microglia respectively. Slices were rinsed and incubated in PB containing 0.3 % Triton X-100 with Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti-mouse or Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:500; Life Technologies) for 2 hours at RT. Before mounting, slices were incubated with DAPI (1:4000; Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 minutes. Immunofluorescence was observed with a laser confocal microscope (SP5; Leica) and images were acquired. Image analysis was performed with Leica Application Suite X software.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and statistically evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or by Wilcoxon tests. Multiple comparisons were performed using the post-hoc Bonferroni comparison test. The relationship between two variables was assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Assessment of cytotoxic effect of PTX

To assess the cytotoxic effect of PTX, we exposed the U87MG cells for 24 hours to increasing doses of PTX, ranging from 20 to 100 nM. Exposure of U87MG cells to PTX results in a dramatic increase of multispindle mitoses, as assessed by immunohistochemical staining of spindles and centrosomes with anti-α-tubulin and anti-γ-tubulin antibodies respectively (Fig. 1a). The percentage of monopolar and multipolar spindle mitoses increases in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1b). While untreated U87MG cells show 0.13 ± 0.09 and 0.06 ± 0.06 % (mean ± SEM) monopolar and multipolar spindle mitoses, respectively, following treatment with 100 nM PTX the percentage of abnormal spindle mitoses in the U87MG cells increases to 1.41 ± 0.34 and 4.63 ± 0.94 % (mean ± SEM) of monopolar and multipolar spindle mitoses, respectively. Of note, the tumor cells exposed to PTX showed a higher number of spindles with respect to control cells (Fig. 1b). For example, the percentage of mitotic figures was significantly higher in U87MG cells treated with 100 nM PTX than in untreated control cells (6.25 ± 1.14 and 0.95 ± 0.27 %; p <0.0005, Wilcoxon test). This is probably because PTX stabilizes microtubules preventing their depolymerization, therefore increasing the number of spindled cells, owing to the active mitotic checkpoint which freezes cells in metaphase. As a consequence of multispindled mitoses, the percentage of multinucleated U87MG cells derived from mitotic slippage increased, in a dose-dependent manner, from 8.87 ± 1.35 % (mean ± SEM) of control cells to 62.49 ± 2.06 % (mean ± SEM) of U87MG treated with 100 nM PTX (Fig. 1d; p <0.0001, ANOVA test).
Fig. 1

Cytotoxic effect of PTX on cultured U87MG cells. U87MG cells treated with PTX undergo aberrant mitoses with monopolar or multipolar spindles, as assessed by immunostaining of mitotic spindles and centrosomes by anti-α-tubulin and anti-γ-tubulin antibodies, respectively (a). The percentage of abnormal spindles is dose dependent. Changes in the percentage of monopolar and multipolar spindle mitoses are significant at 50 and 100 nM PTX (*p <0.05 and **p <0.0005) (b) (left panel). n >1000 cells were counted from each of three independent experiments. Exposure of U87MG cells to the CM of PTX-loaded MSCs induces a strong cytotoxic effect, quantitatively similar to 100 nM PTX, with significant increase of multipolar spindle mitoses (***p <0.0001) (b) (right panel). As a consequence of multispindle mitoses, the percentage of multinucleated U87MG cells (c) (lower panel) versus mononucleated U87MG cells (c) (upper panel) significantly increases (***p <0.0001) both after direct PTX treatment (d) (left panel) and after exposure to CM from PTX-loaded MSCs (d) (right panel). n >2000 cells were counted from each of three independent experiments. Scale bars = 10 μm. CM conditioned medium, CTRL control, DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, MSC mesenchymal stem/stromal cell, PTX paclitaxel

Then, we analyzed the cytotoxic effect produced by the CM from PTX-loaded MSCs on U87MG cells. The mouse bone marrow-derived stromal cell line SR4987 has been described to be efficiently loaded with PTX and to be strongly resistant to PTX cytotoxicity [16, 21]. The PTX equivalent concentration, measured by comparing the inhibitory activity of pure PTX and that of CM from SR4987-PTX cells on a sample cell line (MOLT-4), was previously found to be in the range of 33 pg/cell [16]. To determine the effects of CM from PTX-MSCs on U87MG cells, we loaded the SR4987 MSCs with 2000 ng/ml PTX (2340 nM) and added the CM to cultured U87MG cells. The ability of CM from PTX-loaded MSCs to affect U87MG cell viability was addressed by MTS assay, in comparison with U87MG cells treated with increasing PTX doses ranging from 1.56 to 200 ng/ml. Coherently with our previous results [16], CM dilutions of 1:8 caused a reduction of cell viability of up to 80 % with respect to untreated control U87MG cells, with kinetics strictly resembling that of U87MG cells treated with PTX (Additional file 1).

CM from PTX-MSCs caused a striking cytotoxic effect in terms of altered spindle mitoses (Fig. 1b–d). Multispindle mitoses increased from 0.28 ± 0.20 % (mean ± SEM) in U87MG cells cultured with CM from unloaded MSCs to 3.94 ± 0.67 % in U87MG cells cultured with CM from PTX-MSCs (Fig. 1b, right panel; p <0.0001, Wilcoxon test). As a consequence of aberrant spindles, multinucleated cells increased from 5.20 ± 0.40 to 64.53 ± 2.25 % (mean ± SEM) (Fig. 1c, lower image and d, right panel; p <0.0001, ANOVA test).

It is noteworthy that following treatment with CM from PTX-MSCs, both the percentage of abnormal spindles and the ratio of mononucleated/multinucleated U87MG cells were comparable with those obtained in cells treated with PTX at the higher dose (100 nM) (Fig. 1b, d). U87MG cells exposed to the CM from unloaded MSCs showed an incidence of abnormal spindles and of multinucleated cells which was similar to those seen in control U87MG cells (Fig. 1b, d), indicating that the effect of CM on mitotic events is exclusively due to PTX released in the CM.

PTX-loaded MSCs home to brain tumor

In a previous study, we demonstrated that MSCs loaded with PTX are able to reduce tumor growth in a subcutaneous U87MG GBM model [16]. To address the ability of PTX-loaded MSCs to migrate towards GBM tumors through the brain environment, we established an orthotopic brain tumor by engrafting red fluorescent Cherry-U87MG cells and green fluorescent GFP-MSCs loaded with PTX onto the right striatum of cyclosporine-immunosuppressed rats (n = 6) (Fig. 2a). The two cell populations were engrafted separately in distinct sites that were about 2–3 mm apart. The rationale for this design was to assess whether PTX-loaded MSCs may retain a tropism towards the tumor tissue, which has been described for the unloaded MSCs [22]. Controls included rats inoculated either with Cherry-U87MG plus unloaded MSCs (n = 5) or with Cherry-U87MG cells alone (n = 6). Fluorescent microscopy analysis of seriated brain sections showed that both PTX-loaded MSCs and unloaded MSCs traveled from the injection site towards the U87MG cells and extensively colonized the tumor xenograft (Fig. 2b, c). There were no differences in the path of brain migration between PTX-loaded and unloaded MSCs. Interestingly, we did not find MSCs in brain areas far from the tumor, thus demonstrating that the PTX-loaded MSCs are able to retain a strong tropism towards the U87MG tumor cells.
Fig. 2

Orthotopic brain tumor xenograft. Cherry-U87MG cells and GFP-MSCs, either unloaded or loaded with PTX, were grafted in the right striatum of immunosuppressed rats. The two cell lines were injected into distinct brain sites (a). Low-power picture of a coronal section through the injection sites of GFP-MSCs showing their migration towards the Cherry-U87MG cells. Scale bar = 250 μm (b). High-power pictures showing the red tumor that appears to be massively colonized by the green MSCs. Scale bars = 40 μm (c). GFP green fluorescent protein, MSC mesenchymal stem/stromal cell

PTX-MSCs exert cytotoxic effect on the tumor cells in vivo

We then wondered whether PTX-loaded MSCs may induce any cytotoxic effect on xenografted U87MG cells, reproducing a scenario similar to that observed in vitro. Our in vitro data were translated to the in vivo model in order to provide direct evidence that the PTX-loaded MSCs are able to induce a specific cytotoxic effect on the tumor cells. To characterize the cytotoxic damage caused by PTX, we immunostained the mitotic spindles and centrosomes of tumor cells with anti-α-tubulin and anti-γ-tubulin antibodies, respectively. Coherently with the in vitro observations, we found a significant increase of abnormal spindles in the tumor brain xenografts that had been coinjected with PTX-loaded MSCs compared with tumors containing either Cherry-U87MG cells alone (0.43 ± 0.10 %; p <0.005, Wilcoxon test) or Cherry-U87MG plus unloaded MSCs (0.09 ± 0.06 %; p <0.0005, Wilcoxon test) (Fig. 3c). These results demonstrate that PTX released into the tumor microenvironment by PTX-loaded MSCs increased the amount of abnormal mitoses mostly because of multispindle divisions. We then assessed the mononucleated and multinucleated U87MG cells in xenografts containing either PTX-loaded MSCs or unloaded MSCs (Fig. 4). Multinucleated tumor cells were very rare in brains grafted with U87MG cells alone as well as in the tumors cografted with unloaded MSCs. Conversely, the brain tumors populated by PTX-loaded MSCs showed a remarkable fraction of multinucleated U87MG cells that ranged between 5.97 and 75.86 % (Fig. 4a). In the xenografts containing U87MG cells plus unloaded MSCs, the percentage of multinucleated U87MG cells was very low (3.23 ± 0.32 %, mean ± SEM), and this result was not affected by the density of MSCs that surrounded the tumor cells (Fig. 4b, left panel; Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.42). Conversely, the number of multinucleated U87MG cells was significantly related to the density of PTX-MSCs (Fig. 4b, right panel; Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.92), demonstrating that the nuclear changes in the tumor cells are a direct consequence of PTX release by MSC-loaded cells. Note that in the U87MG plus PTX-MSCs xenografts, the basal level of multinucleated tumor cells per tissue section was higher than in control U87MG plus unloaded MSC xenografts (Fig. 4b). This result is probably due to PTX-MSCs that lay in adjacent tissue sections and were not counted. We did not observe PTX-induced nuclear changes in the astrocytes as well as in neurons surrounding the brain site where PTX-loaded MSCs had been implanted (Additional file 2).
Fig. 3

Immunohistochemical characterization of PTX-induced cytotoxic effect in U87MG xenografts. Representative immunostaining with markers of mitotic spindles (α-tubulin) and of centrosome (γ-tubulin) showing mitotic alterations in brain tumor xenografts. In brain xenografts containing PTX-loaded MSCs, there was a strong increase in aberrant spindle configurations, mainly resulting in multipolar spindle mitoses (a) and in centrosome number defects (b) (white arrows). Scale bars = 10 μm. Multipolar spindles of tumor cells in the PTX-MSCs/U87MG grafts are significantly higher with respect both to tumor xenografts derived by injection of U87MG cells alone and to tumors generated by the injection of U87MG cells and unloaded MSCs (c). DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, GFP green fluorescent protein, MSC mesenchymal stem/stromal cell, PTX paclitaxel

Fig. 4

Cytotoxic effect of PTX on U87MG brain xenografts. PTX released into the tumor microenvironment by PTX-loaded MSCs causes cytotoxic effect to the U87MG cells resulting in aberrant, multinucleated tumor cells (scale bars = 10 μm) (a). The percentage of multinucleated U87MG cells directly relates to the percentage of PTX-loaded MSCs on the total number of cells per field (b). MSC mesenchymal stem/stromal cell, PTX paclitaxel, r Pearson correlation coefficient

To assess whether cyclosporine depressed the immune response at similar levels amongst individual rats, we investigated the brain microglia by Iba1 immunofluorescence in the grafted region and, as a control, in the contralateral striatum (Additional file 3) [23]. Compared with the brain region contralateral to the xenograft, where rare resting Iba1-positive cells were sparsely and homogeneously distributed, the grafted striatum showed a remarkable increase of the activated microglial cells. However, the density of these cells did not substantially differ between the group of rats grafted with U87MG cells alone and the group grafted with U87MG cells plus MSCs as well as amongst rats of the same group.

Discussion

MSCs are adult stem cells that have been isolated from several tissues and have recently gained great attention as a possible therapeutic tool for a number of diseases. The use of MSCs to treat cancer patients appears a real practical opportunity. Due to their unique ability to differentiate and to produce immunomodulatory as well as anti-apoptotic, anti-angiogenic, and pro-survival factors, MSCs gave promising results in a preclinical model of regenerative medicine [24]. However, the most relevant potentiality of MSCs in clinic stems from the peculiar feature of MSCs to home the stroma of various primary and metastatic tumors [25, 26]. This feature prompts using MSCs as vehicles to specifically deliver anti-tumor compounds directly to the tumor microenvironment, minimizing systemic toxicity. However, there is some evidence raising the issue of pro-survival effects of MSCs on tumor cells [2729]. On the contrary, it has been demonstrated recently that induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs possess lower potential to promote tumors than bone marrow MSCs [30]. We and others have previously demonstrated that MSCs of different origin can be loaded in vitro with anti-neoplastic drugs, like PTX and doxorubicin (DXR), without affecting their viability [16, 3133]. The same does not hold true for other stem cells, such as hematopoietic stem cells, which display signs of cytotoxic damage after priming with DXR. We also showed that PTX-loaded MSCs are able to reduce tumor cell proliferation and endothelial cell viability in vitro and to reduce the growth of subcutaneous tumor xenografts [16, 31].

PTX is the best-selling chemotherapeutic compound in history [34] and is currently used to treat a wide variety of human cancers [35, 36]. PTX targets the β-tubulin subunit of microtubules in the cytoskeleton. Unlike other tubulin-targeting drugs such as colchicine that inhibit microtubule assembly, PTX stabilizes the polymer and protects it from disassembly [10, 12]. Chromosomes are thus unable to achieve a correct metaphase spindle configuration. This blocks progression of mitoses, and prolongs activation of the mitotic checkpoint triggering apoptosis [37] or reversion to the G phase of the cell cycle without cell division [3840]. PTX-treated cells have defects in mitotic spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, and cell division. The ability of PTX to inhibit spindle function is generally attributed to its suppression of microtubule dynamics [41], but recent studies have demonstrated that suppression of dynamics occurs at concentrations lower than those needed to block mitosis [42]. At the higher therapeutic concentrations, PTX appears to suppress microtubule detachment from centrosomes, a process normally activated during mitosis [43]. The mechanism of PTX action and its in vivo cytotoxic effects therefore seem to depend mostly on its local concentration [14]. Moreover, PTX might also have a role in inhibiting angiogenesis and vascularization [44].

In this article we addressed two specific issues. Firstly, we wanted to prove that MSCs loaded with PTX retain their tropism towards the U87MG tumor cells. Several groups demonstrated that intracerebrally grafted MSCs migrate for considerable distances through the brain parenchyma approaching the site where GBM tumor cells have been implanted [17, 45]. Here, we wondered whether PTX loading may affect the tropism of MSCs towards GBM tumors. Secondly, we wanted to assess whether the brain xenografts containing PTX-loaded MSCs showed signs of PTX-induced cytotoxic damage by the U87MG tumor cells. Results answered both questions. In the U87MG brain xenografts, nearly all of the MSCs injected in the proximity of tumor cells migrated toward the tumor and populated it, and this behavior was not affected by PTX loading. The concentration of PTX achieved inside the tumor was high enough to induce a significant increase of abnormal spindle mitoses (mono/multispindles) and, as a consequence, of aberrant multinucleated cells.

PTX is commonly understood to act as a microtubule poison and to lead to mitotic arrest; however, this knowledge is largely based on in vitro studies. In a recent study, Zasadil et al. [14] measured the concentration of PTX in patients treated for breast cancer at therapeutic dosages. They found that at therapeutic concentrations of PTX the tumor cells do not undergo mitotic arrest but proceed through mitosis with abnormal spindles, resulting in chromosome missegregation, eventually leading cells to die. Our in vivo data are consistent with these observations. The use of MSCs for local PTX delivery does have a translational potentiality because we observed in vivo cytotoxic damage of the tumor cells similar to that obtained in patients after systemic administration. Importantly, our approach avoids the side effects of systemic PTX delivery without damaging the brain cell populations.

Conclusion

The present work demonstrates that MSCs loaded with PTX maintain a tropism toward brain tumors, and that these cells release the drug causing a specific cytotoxic damage of the tumor cells. Our data support the value of MSCs for local anti-cancer therapy.

Notes

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

BSA: 

Bovine serum albumin

CM: 

Conditioned medium

DAPI: 

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

DXR: 

doxorubicin

GBM: 

Glioblastoma multiforme

GFP: 

Green fluorescent protein

HBSS: 

Hanks balanced salt solution

IMDM: 

Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium

MSC: 

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell

NDS: 

Normal donkey serum

PB: 

Phosphate buffer

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

PTX: 

Paclitaxel

RT: 

Room temperature

SEM: 

Standard error of the mean

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by AIRC IG 2013 N.14574 to RP.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Neurosurgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
(2)
CNR-Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology (IBCN)
(3)
Institute of Anatomy, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
(4)
Institute of Pathology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
(5)
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan
(6)
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia
(7)
Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta

References

  1. Weldon JE, Xiang L, Chertov O, Margulies I, Kreitman RJ, FitzGerald DJ, et al. A protease-resistant immunotoxin against CD22 with greatly increased activity against CLL and diminished animal toxicity. Blood. 2009;113:3792–800.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dhar S, Gu FX, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Lippard SJ. Targeted delivery of cisplatin to prostate cancer cells by aptamer functionalized Pt(IV) prodrug-PLGA-PEG nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17356–61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Loebinger MR, Eddaoudi A, Davies D, Janes SM. Mesenchymal stem cell delivery of TRAIL can eliminate metastatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4134–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation. 1968;6:230–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Elzaouk L, Moelling K, Pavlovic J. Anti-tumor activity of mesenchymal stem cells producing IL-12 in a mouse melanoma model. Exp Dermatol. 2006;15:865–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kucerova L, Altanerova V, Matuskova M, Tyciakova S, Altaner C. Adipose tissue-derived human mesenchymal stem cells mediated prodrug cancer gene therapy. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6304–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Yong RL, Shinojima N, Fueyo J, Gumin J, Vecil GG, Marini FC, et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for intravascular delivery of oncolytic adenovirus Delta24-RGD to human gliomas. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8932–40.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang XB, Beard BC, Trobridge GD, Wood BL, Sale GE, Sud R, et al. High incidence of leukemia in large animals after stem cell gene therapy with a HOXB4-expressing retroviral vector. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1502–10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schiff PB, Fant J, Horwitz SB. Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol. Nature. 1979;277:665–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Milross CG, Mason KA, Hunter NR, Chung WK, Peters LJ, Milas L. Relationship of mitotic arrest and apoptosis to antitumor effect of paclitaxel. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1308–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schiff PB, Horwitz SB. Taxol stabilizes microtubules in mouse fibroblast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980;77:1561–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jordan MA, Toso RJ, Thrower D, Wilson L. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:9552–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zasadil LM, Andersen KA, Yeum D, Rocque GB, Wilke LG, Tevaarwerk AJ, et al. Cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in breast cancer is due to chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:229ra43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Woods CM, Zhu J, McQueney PA, Bollag D, Lazarides E. Taxol-induced mitotic block triggers rapid onset of a p53-independent apoptotic pathway. Mol Med. 1995;1:506–26.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pessina A, Bonomi A, Cocce V, Invernici G, Navone S, Cavicchini L, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells primed with paclitaxel provide a new approach for cancer therapy. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28321.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Menon LG, Pratt J, Yang HW, Black PM, Sorensen GA, Carroll RS. Imaging of human mesenchymal stromal cells: homing to human brain tumors. J Neuro-Oncol. 2012;107:257–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pessina A, Mineo E, Neri MG, Gribaldo L, Colombi R, Brambilla P, et al. Establishment and characterization of a new murine cell line (SR-4987) derived from marrow stromal cells. Cytotechnology. 1992;8:93–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pessina A, Sisto F, Cocce V, Cavicchini L, Ciusani E, Gribaldo L, et al. A mesenchymal stromal cell line resistant to paclitaxel that spontaneously differentiates into osteoblast-like cells. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2011;27:169–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dull T, Zufferey R, Kelly M, Mandel RJ, Nguyen M, Trono D, et al. A third-generation lentivirus vector with a conditional packaging system. J Virol. 1998;72:8463–71.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pascucci L, Cocce V, Bonomi A, Ami D, Ceccarelli P, Ciusani E, et al. Paclitaxel is incorporated by mesenchymal stromal cells and released in exosomes that inhibit in vitro tumor growth: a new approach for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2014;192:262–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kidd S, Spaeth E, Dembinski JL, Dietrich M, Watson K, Klopp A, et al. Direct evidence of mesenchymal stem cell tropism for tumor and wounding microenvironments using in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2614–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Prinz M, Priller J. Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age: from origin to neuropsychiatric disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:300–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Donnenberg VS, Zimmerlin L, Rubin JP, Donnenberg AD. Regenerative therapy after cancer: what are the risks? Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010;16:567–75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chaturvedi P, Gilkes DM, Wong CC, Kshitiz, Luo W, Zhang H, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent breast cancer-mesenchymal stem cell bidirectional signaling promotes metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:189–205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Song C, Li G. CXCR4 and matrix metalloproteinase-2 are involved in mesenchymal stromal cell homing and engraftment to tumors. Cytotherapy. 2011;13:549–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Karnoub AE, Dash AB, Vo AP, Sullivan A, Brooks MW, Bell GW, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2007;449:557–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Klopp AH, Zhang Y, Solley T, Amaya-Manzanares F, Marini F, Andreeff M, et al. Omental adipose tissue-derived stromal cells promote vascularization and growth of endometrial tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:771–82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu S, Ginestier C, Ou SJ, Clouthier SG, Patel SH, Monville F, et al. Breast cancer stem cells are regulated by mesenchymal stem cells through cytokine networks. Cancer Res. 2011;71:614–24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao Q, Gregory CA, Lee RH, Reger RL, Qin L, Hai B, et al. MSCs derived from iPSCs with a modified protocol are tumor-tropic but have much less potential to promote tumors than bone marrow MSCs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:530–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pessina A, Cocce V, Pascucci L, Bonomi A, Cavicchini L, Sisto F, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells primed with Paclitaxel attract and kill leukaemia cells, inhibit angiogenesis and improve survival of leukaemia-bearing mice. Br J Haematol. 2013;160:766–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pessina A, Piccirillo M, Mineo E, Catalani P, Gribaldo L, Marafante E, et al. Role of SR-4987 stromal cells in the modulation of doxorubicin toxicity to in vitro granulocyte-macrophage progenitors (CFU-GM). Life Sci. 1999;65:513–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bosco DB, Kenworthy R, Zorio DA, Sang QX. Human mesenchymal stem cells are resistant to Paclitaxel by adopting a non-proliferative fibroblastic state. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128511.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wani MC, Taylor HL, Wall ME, Coggon P, McPhail AT. Plant antitumor agents. VI. The isolation and structure of taxol, a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent from Taxus brevifolia. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93:2325–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Walsh V, Goodman J. From taxol to Taxol: the changing identities and ownership of an anti-cancer drug. Med Anthropol. 2002;21:307–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowinsky EK, Eisenhauer EA, Chaudhry V, Arbuck SG, Donehower RC. Clinical toxicities encountered with paclitaxel (Taxol). Semin Oncol. 1993;20:1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Park SJ, Wu CH, Gordon JD, Zhong X, Emami A, Safa AR. Taxol induces caspase-10-dependent apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:51057–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bharadwaj R, Yu H. The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:2016–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Brito DA, Yang Z, Rieder CL. Microtubules do not promote mitotic slippage when the spindle assembly checkpoint cannot be satisfied. J Cell Biol. 2008;182:623–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rowinsky EK, Calvo E. Novel agents that target tublin and related elements. Semin Oncol. 2006;33:421–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Jordan MA, Wilson L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:253–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ikui AE, Yang CP, Matsumoto T, Horwitz SB. Low concentrations of taxol cause mitotic delay followed by premature dissociation of p55CDC from Mad2 and BubR1 and abrogation of the spindle checkpoint, leading to aneuploidy. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1385–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ganguly A, Yang H, Cabral F. Paclitaxel-dependent cell lines reveal a novel drug activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2914–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shnyder SD, Hasan J, Cooper PA, Pilarinou E, Jubb E, Jayson GC, et al. Development of a modified hollow fibre assay for studying agents targeting the tumour neovasculature. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:1889–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ho IA, Lam PY. Signaling molecules and pathways involved in MSC tumor tropism. Histol Histopathol. 2013;28:1427–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pacioni et al. 2015

Advertisement