In vitro generation of Sertoli-like and haploid spermatid-like cells from human umbilical cord perivascular cells
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 December 2016
Accepted: 27 January 2017
Published: 15 February 2017
First trimester (FTM) and term human umbilical cord-derived perivascular cells (HUCPVCs), which are rich sources of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), can give rise to Sertoli cell (SC)-like as well as haploid germ cell (GC)-like cells in vitro using culture conditions that recapitulate the testicular niche.
Gamete-like cells have been produced ex vivo using pluripotent stem cells as well as MSCs. However, the production of functional gametes from human stem cells has yet to be achieved.
Three independent lines of FTM and term HUCPVCs were cultured using a novel 5-week step-wise in vitro differentiation protocol recapitulating key physiological signals involved in testicular development. SC- and GC-associated phenotypical properties were assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), quantitative PCR immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Functional spermatogonial stem cell-like properties were assessed using a xenotranplantation assay.
Within 3 weeks of differentiation, two morphologically distinct cell types emerged including large adherent cells and semi-attached round cells. Both early GC-associated markers (VASA, DAZL, GPR125, GFR1α) and SC-associated markers (FSHR, SOX9, AMH) were upregulated, and 5.7 ± 1.2% of these cells engrafted near the inner basal membrane in a xenograft assay. After 5 weeks in culture, 10–30% of the cells were haploid, had adopted a spermatid-like morphology, and expressed PRM1, Acrosin, and ODF2. Undifferentiated HUCPVCs secreted key factors known to regulate spermatogenesis (LIF, GDNF, BMP4, bFGF) and 10–20% of HUCPVCs co-expressed SSEA4, CD9, CD90, and CD49f. We hypothesize that the paracrine properties and cellular heterogeneity of HUCPVCs may explain their dual capacity to differentiate to both SC- and GC-like cells.
HUCPVCs recapitulate elements of the testicular niche including their ability to differentiate into cells with Sertoli-like and haploid spermatid-like properties in vitro. Our study supports the importance of generating a niche-like environment under ex vivo conditions aiming at creating mature GC, and highlights the plasticity of HUCPVCs. This could have future applications for the treatment of some cases of male infertility.
KeywordsEx-vivo spermatogenesis Germ cell Sertoli cell Spermatogonial stem cell Niche Human mesenchymal stem cell Perivascular cell Human umbilical cord Xenograft Paracrine
The production of mature functional gametes from spermatogonial stem cells and pluripotent stem cells ex vivo or using xenografting techniques has been achieved in rodent models , large domestic animals , and by allogeneic spermatogonia stem cell (SSC) transplantation into nonhuman primates . To date, studies using various human stem cell sources have yielded rudimentary, but not functional, gametes . However, the influx of recent reports on this topic [5–9] have described key milestones towards achieving this goal and suggest that the derivation of gametes from human pluripotent stem cells might be achieved by mimicking the physiological signals known to regulate spermatogenesis [10, 11]. Normal spermatogenesis is highly dependent on precise environmental cues. Cell autonomous factors, niche crosstalk, and hormones are all required for this regulated process . Spermatogenesis starts in utero where the primordial germ cells (PGCs) create a pool of diploid SSCs which will eventually differentiate to mature haploid sperm after puberty. More than 50 years ago, the Canadian team led by Yves Clermont put forward the hierarchical model of spermatogenesis . This process is now well characterized, and markers have been identified for each of the differentiation stages [12, 14, 15]. The concept that the entire testicular niche is required for ex vivo sperm production was a pivotal factor in the first successful derivation of functional sperm from mouse spermatogonial stem cell ex vivo in a three-dimensional system . Sato et al.  plated testicular tissue from neonate rodents and created mature functional sperm and healthy offspring.
The principal somatic cell populations of the mammalian testes niche include Sertoli cells (SCs), Leydig, and peritubular myoid cells. SCs are the only somatic cells located within seminiferous tubules and are intimately associated with developing germ cells (GCs). For these reasons, they are considered to be the most important somatic cell population contributing to the SSC niche . The origin of human SCs remains debatable . Studies in rodents provided direct evidence for an epithelial origin [17, 18], but recent human studies suggested that they may also originate from the mesenchyme [19, 20]. Others have suggested a dual origin for SCs, leading to the production of more than one type of SC during development .
Our group has previously characterized the stem cell-associated properties of a rich source of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from first trimester (FTM) umbilical cords  and we, as well as others, have characterized these properties in term human umbilical cords . Previous reports demonstrated that these cells, termed human umbilical cord-derived perivascular cells (HUCPVCs), have the capacity to differentiate towards both mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal lineages (all three germ layers) in vitro [22, 23]. To further investigate the plasticity of HUCPVCs, here we aimed to differentiate HUCPVCs towards the SC lineage, with the major aim of recreating an in vitro testicular niche. Interestingly, utilizing a novel protocol that we developed for these cells, we were able to sequentially recapitulate key physiological signals involved in testicular development, and this led to the in vitro differentiation of HUCPVCs towards both haploid GC-like cells as well as SC-like cells.
Independent research ethics board (REB) approval was obtained for the collection of human umbilical cord (REB No. 454-2011, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; REB No. 28889, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) and human testicular tissue obtained from orchiectomies performed at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada (REB No. 30252, University of Toronto and REB No. 14-0032-E Mount Sinai Hospital for this study). First trimester, term umbilical cords, and orchiectomy testicular samples were isolated from patients that provided written informed consent. Human granulosa cells (GLCs) and spermatozoa, used as positive controls for the assessment of cell lineage-associated markers, were each obtained from CReATe Fertility Centre patients that provided written informed consent (University of Toronto REB No. 29237 and REB No. 29211, respectively). All animal work was performed in accordance with CACC guidelines and the Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics’ animal facility approval (AUP No. 17-0245 and No. 16-228H, respectively).
Cell isolation and culture
Previously established male lines of FTM human umbilical cord perivascular cells (n = 3) and counterparts derived from full-term birth (n = 3; Life Line Stem Cell, New Haven, Indiana, USA) were expanded in α-minimum essential medium (αMEM; Gibco, USA) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone, USA, Lot AWK24007) as described previously (Hong et al., ). NTERA2 (pluripotent human testicular embryonal carcinoma cell line clone D1; ATCC, USA, Cat. CREL-1973, Lot 59348173) were used as positive controls in the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and integrated cell culture (ICC) assessment of GC marker expression including DAZL, VASA, and GPR125. NTERA2 cells were expanded in formulated Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; ATCC, USA). Human testicular tissue was also used as a positive control in some of the immunofluorescence studies (to assess SYCP3 expression). Testicular tissue was cut into 2–4 mm3 pieces and the tubules were teased apart with forceps in DMEM/F12 (Gibco, USA) containing nonessential amino acids (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), 4 mM l-glutamine (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), sodium bicarbonate (7.5%; Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 40 μg/ml gentamicin (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), and penicillin (100 IU/ml)/streptomycin 100 μg/ml (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Two enzymatic digestion steps were performed by adding 1 mg/ml collagenase type I (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, Cat. LS004196), 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase type II (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, Cat. H2126), and 1 mg/ml trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, Cat. T1005) for 15 min at 32 °C with gentle shaking followed by 1 mg/ml collagenase type I and 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase for 30 min at 32 °C with gentle shaking. DNase I (8 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, USA, Cat. DN25-7100MG) was used in all steps of isolation. Human granulosa cells (GLCs) were used as positive control for the assessment of FSHR expression, and human spermatozoa were used as positive control for ACROSIN, PRM1, and ODF2 expression, and haploidy.
Primary mouse Sertoli cell and epididymal cell cultures
Epididymis and testes were isolated from euthanized adult (4–6 weeks) CD-1 male mice (Charles River). Mouse Sertoli cells and epididymal cells were isolated and cultured as previously described .
Busulfan-induced xenograft model and histological analysis
Six-week-old NOD/SCID mice (n = 3; Charles River, USA) were treated 44 mg/kg busulfan (Sigma, USA) at least 6 weeks before donor cell transplantation. FTM HUCPVCs from the end of Step 3 of our protocol were labeled by incubating them with 0.4 μl PKH26 Red Fluorescent (Sigma, USA)/100ul diluent C (Sigma, USA)/1 × 106 cells, as per manufacturer’s instructions. Labeling was qualitatively verified by fluorescence microscopy using the EVOS microscopy (ThermoFisher, USA). For cell transplantation, the seminiferous tubules of recipient mice were filled with approximately 10–15 μl/testis of the donor cell suspension (containing 1 × 106 labeled cells) by injection through the rete testis as described previously . As a control, we injected 10 μl/testis of saline to busulfan-treated mice in the same way. Animals were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation 6 weeks post-cell transplantation and the testes were harvested and snap frozen in OCT (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA). Unfixed frozen sections were prepared and stained with Hoechst to visualize endogenous PKH26 fluorescence from injected cells and subsequently fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for immunostaining with rabbit anti-human DAZL antibody (1:100; Abcam, USA, Cat. ab34139). The location of the PKH26-labeled cells was analyzed by manual counting of 36 independent tissue sections.
Gene expression analysis (gene arrays, RT-PCR, qPCR)
Cells were isolated by trypsinization (see above) and cell pellets were snap frozen. RNA samples were prepared using the RNAeasy microkit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by DNase I treatment to eliminate traces of genomic DNA. For real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR primers are described in Additional file 1: Table S1. A commercial Human Growth Factor RT2 Profiler™ PCR Array (PHAS-041ZR-12, Qiagen, USA) was used to evaluate the expression of paracrine factors expressed by undifferentiated FTM and term HUCPVCs cultured in αMEM + 10% FBS. Germ cell lineage-specific genes were assessed using SYBR green quantitative (q)PCR. Briefly, RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using RNA to cDNA EcoDry Premix (Clontech, USA, Cat. ST0335, Lot 1310097A) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All qPCR experiments were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions on the Rotor-gene 6000 instrument (Corbett, USA) using 10 ng total cDNA per reaction. For the qPCR arrays, gene expression levels were determined using PCR Array Data Analysis Centre software (Qiagen, USA) using the delta-delta Ct (ΔΔCt) method and reported as the fold-change relative to term HUCPVCs. For the qPCR-SYBR green primer assays analysis (Additional file 2: Table S2), standard curves were generated using positive control cDNA dilutions  and this method was used to report fold-change between undifferentiated and differentiated cells. GAPDH and RPL13 were used as normalizers. All gene array assays were performed in triplicate for at least three independent HUCPVC lines at passage 4. For qPCR of specific germ cell markers, two representative lines of FTM and term HUCPVCs were used. Genes with normalized Ct >30 were considered as not detected.
Collection and analysis of conditioned media by ELISA
Two hundred thousand HUCPVCs plated on a 10-cm2 dish (BD Biosciences, USA) were cultured in αMEM (Gibco, USA) + 10% FBS (Hyclone, USA) until they reached 70% confluency, at which point they were rinsed twice with PBS, and incubated in unsupplemented DMEM-F12 (Gibco, USA) or StemPro 34 (Gibco, USA) medium for 1 h. Unsupplemented basal medium was changed and cells were incubated for 72 h. Medium was collected, filtered using 70-μm cell strainers (Fisherbrand, USA) and snap frozen in 1–5 ml aliquots. Cells were harvested and counted using the Countess® Automated Cell Counter (Life Technologies, USA). For enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), conditioned medium was thawed and concentrated using protein concentrators (Pierce, USA). Basal medium was used as a control. ELISA analysis for human bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), LIF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and GDNF was performed according to manufacturer instructions, including the kit standards (RayBiotech, USA), and analyzed in duplicate on a Multi-Mode Microplate reader F5 (Molecular Devices, USA) The blank optical density (OD) value measured for all experiments was subtracted from basal medium, FTM, and term HUCPVC conditioned medium OD values. The quantity of each factor was calculated using the standard curve equation, dilution factor, and final volume collected, and is expressed as the amount of each factor secreted from the originally plated 200,000 cells.
For analysis of cells throughout the stages of in vitro differentiation, single cell suspensions were obtained by dissociation with TrypLE (Invitrogen, USA) at 37 °C for 5 min and resuspended in 1% FBS/PBS. The cells were filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer (Fisherbrand, USA). Antibodies used include: anti-human FSHR (1:25; Santa Cruz Biotech, USA, Cat. sc-13935), anti-GPR125 (1:80; Cat. ab51705), anti-human GDNFR (1:50; Cat. ab84106) anti-VASA (1:25; Cat. AB13840, all from Abcam, USA). For all reactions, the secondary antibody used was Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit (1:2000; Life Technologies, USA). Propidium iodide (PI, 1:2000; Sigma, USA) was used to exclude dead cells. Unstained samples were used as controls. Live cells were analyzed for cell surface markers using an LSRII cell analyzer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, USA). Analysis was performed using FlowJo X (Flow Jo, USA). To determine if induced HUCPVCs had undergone meiosis during differentiation, we performed flow cytometric analysis-based DNA content evaluations of FTM and term HUCPVCs throughout the differentiation process . To detect haploid cells, cells were suspended at approximately 105 cells in 0.25 ml PBS (Sigma, USA) and then vortexed to obtain a monodispersed cell suspension. Cell were fixed in 1 ml 70% ice cold ethanol and kept for 1 h on ice. The cells were washed and resuspended in PI solution: 10 μg/ml PI (Sigma, USA) and 100 μg/ml DNase-free RNase A (Sigma, USA, Cat. R-6513) in PBS.
Staining with primary antibodies was identical to the above flow cytometry preparation. After primary antibody incubation and washes, cells were placed on Superfrost® Plus slides (MENZEL-GLASER, Germany), allowed to dry for 10 min, and fixed with 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich, Canada), followed by secondary antibody staining and mounting with permafluor (ThermoFisher, USA). For DAZL (1:100; Abcam, USA, Cat. ab34139), GPR125 (1:200; Abcam, USA, Cat. ab51705), and FSHR (1:50; Santa Cruz, USA, Cat. sc-13935) immunostaining, cells were washed and fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min prior to the blocking step. For intracellular staining, cells were permeabilized with 0.03% Triton-X (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in PBS after fixation. Cells were blocked with 10% normal goat/rabbit serum (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, USA) in PBS for 30 min and incubated at 4 °C overnight with the primary antibodies anti-Sall4 (1:250; Abcam, USA, Cat. ab57577), anti-Acrosin (1:50; Santa Cruz, USA, Cat. sc-46284), anti-Protamine1 (1:50; Santa Cruz, USA, Cat. sc-23107), and anti-ODF2 (1:200; Abcam, USA, Cat. ab43840). The cells underwent three 5-min washes with PBS and were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with secondary antibodies Alexa 488 Goat anti-rabbit or rabbit anti-goat (both 1:500; Invitrogen, USA). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (1:1000; Invitrogen, USA) for 10 min followed by three 5-min washes with PBS. Slides were protected with mounting media (PermaFluor, ThermoScientific, USA). Fluorescence images were observed and captured using the EVOS fluorescence microscope (AMG, USA) or spinning disk confocal microscope (Quorum Zeiss AxioVert, SickKids Imaging Facility, Toronto), Images were processed and quantified using Volocity™ (Perkin-Elmer, USA) imaging software.
Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)
Cells were collected and then suspended in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Carnoy’s Solution (3:1 methanol:acetic acid; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added in a 10:1 ratio with the sample suspension, then centrifuged for 5 min at 1500 rpm (300 g). The cell pellet was resuspended in Carnoy’s Solution, incubated for 15 min at –20 °C, and then centrifugation was repeated. Cold 10-μl drops were placed on pre-coated fluoro slides (Thermo Scientific, USA) and warmed to 52 °C. Slides were dehydrated, then decondensed in 0.5 M NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) solution for 1 min and then dehydration was repeated. Slides were then treated with 4 μl AneuVysion Multicolor DNA Probe (Vysis CEP 18/X/Y; Abbott Molecular, USA), and then incubated in a 37 °C humidified chamber for a minimum of 16 h. Following incubation, slides were rinsed in 0.3% NP 40 in 0.4× SSC warmed to 73 °C for 2 min followed by 0.1% NP 40 in 2× SSC for 10 s. Once dry, slides were counterstained with DAPI (Abbott Molecular, USA) and coverslipped. Slides were analyzed for diploidy by examining chromosomes X, Y, and 18 using DAPI, FITC, TxRed, and Aqua channels on an Olympus BX 61 fluorescence microscope and imaged using HCImage software (Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan). Human sperm was used as a positive control for analysis. Slides were stored between analyses and for the long-term at –20 °C.
All results were generated from at least three independent experiments using 1–3 independent FTM HUCPVC lines and 1–3 term HUCPVC lines. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined using the Student’s t test and differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
HUCPVCs are a heterogeneous cell population expressing both testicular niche growth factors and testis progenitor markers
FTM HUCPVCs and term HUCPVCs express testis niche-associated growth factors
Full gene name
Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor
Fibroblast growth factor 2
Fibroblast growth factor 1
Leukemia inhibitory factor
Bone morphogenetic protein 6
Bone morphogenetic protein 4
Transforming growth factor beta 1
Vascular endothelial growth factor A
HUPVCs differentiate into both Sertoli-like and germ-like cells under the same culture conditions in vitro
Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) are specifically expressed in Sertoli cells during testicular development. FSHR expression persists in mature Sertoli cells. We did not detect FSHR or AMH expression in control undifferentiated FTM HUCPVCs or term HUCPVCs (Fig. 3c and g). In FTM HUCPVCs subjected to this differentiation protocol, FSHR was upregulated as early as Step 1 and at each ensuing step, while term HUCPVCs did not upregulate this marker until Step 3 (Fig. 3c and g). Other Sertoli-associated markers (SOX9, TGFRβ1 and CLU (clusterin)) were detected at low levels in undifferentiated HUCPVCs, but were upregulated during the differentiation process (Fig. 3c and g). Upregulation of FSHR expression was observed by immunocytochemistry in HUCPVCs at Step 2 and Step 3 in both FTM and term cells and in granulosa cells utilized as a positive control (Fig. 3d). FSHR was undetectable by flow cytometry in undifferentiated cells (0.17 ± 0. 27%) and was found to be upregulated (5.72 ± 6.32%) among FTM HUCPVCs by the end of Step 2 (p < 0.05), and by 12.6 ± 10.8% in FTM HUCPVCs (p < 0.001) by the end of Step 3 (Fig. 3e; Additional file 3: Figure S1A). While FSHR was upregulated in some of the experiments using term HUCPVCs (from 0 ± 0% undifferentiated term HUCPVCs to 9.15 ± 9.47% at Step 2 and 3.76% at Step 3), this did not reach significance.
VASA and DAZL are well characterized early germ cell lineage markers [35–37]; VASA and DAZL were not detected in undifferentiated HUCPVCs from FTM or term HUCPVCs. Unlike FTM cells, DAZL gene expression was upregulated as early as Step 1 for term HUCPVC lines, but upregulated in both FTM HUCPVCs and term HUCPVCs by the end of Step 3. In contrast, VASA was upregulated at an earlier stage in FTM HUCPVCs (Step 1) when compared to term HUCPVCs (Fig. 3f and g). Upregulation of the GC-associated markers DAZL and VASA was confirmed by ICC (Fig. 3 h and i; lower magnification images shown in Additional file 3: Figure S2) at both Step 2 (data not shown) and Step 3 for both FTM and term cells, as well as in NTERA2 or dissociated human testicular cells (positive controls; Fig. 3h and i; Additional file 3: Figure S3) but not in undifferentiated cells (negative control). Flow cytometric analysis of VASA expression in FTM HUCPVCs in undifferentiated or Step 2 cultures revealed upregulation of this pan-germ cell marker in 15 ± 6.4% of FTM HUCPVCs (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3j).
A modified transplantation assay provides evidence for the functional SSC properties of differentiated HUCPVCs
Differentiated HUCPVCs undergo spermatid-like morphological changes, together with upregulation of late-stage spermatogenesis markers
FTM and term HUCPVCs give rise to haploid cells in vitro
In this study, we aimed to derive human Sertoli cells from human umbilical cord-derived perivascular mesenchymal stromal cells (HUCPVCs). Unexpectedly both Sertoli-like cells and germ-like cells were derived in vitro under culture conditions designed to mimic those present during normal development. Our findings deliver key advances in conceptual and methodological paradigms for the field of human regenerative reproductive biology research, including possible strategies for the generation of mature functional human spermatozoa.
Our findings that HUCPVCs can differentiate to Sertoli-like and germ cells corroborate previous reports on the ability of MSCs to restore mesenchymal lineages [22, 23] to differentiate to Sertoli cells in mice  and their capacity to differentiate into germ cells [42–45]. However, to our knowledge, our results provide the first reported evidence for the differentiation of the human adult stem cell population towards Sertoli-like cells and germ-like cells under the same conditions. Sertoli cells are defined by their phenotypes, including gene and cell surface marker expression, as well as functional properties. Sertoli cells have diverse functions including nursing of germ cells via their secretory products, phagocytosis and elimination of cytoplasm, and as components of a structural blood-testis barrier [46–51]. In the current study, we were able to derive cells which morphologically resembled Sertoli cells, expressed Sertoli-associated genes including FSHR and AMH, and upregulated SOX9, TGFRB1, and CLU. Furthermore, these cells were able to nurse and support the differentiation of germ cell-like cells in the presence of media supplements.
It remains unclear how both Sertoli-like cells and germ-like cells could be derived under the same conditions from HUCPVCs. Murine studies have demonstrated that germ cells originate from the proximal epiblast  while Sertoli cells and HUCPVCs cells originate from the mesoderm and extraembryonic mesoderm, respectively . Germ cell specification requires noncell autonomous signaling by BMPs derived from the extraembryonic ectoderm and visceral endoderm [52, 54–56]. The multipotency of HUCPVCs and their ability to differentiate to two testicular cell lineages under the same culture conditions can likely be attributed to their inherent heterogeneity. Others have identified a subpopulation of very small embryonic-like cells (VSELs) expressing OCT4A and SSEAA [57, 58] from umbilical cord [59, 60] and other tissues [57, 58]. We previously showed that a subpopulation of HUCPVCs express OCT4A and SSEA4 , but it remains to be determined whether these cells correspond to previously characterized pluripotent VSELs. In the current study, we further describe at least two distinct subpopulations in our undifferentiated HUCPVC cultures: a minor SSEA4-positive subpopulation and a major SSEA4-negative subpopulation. Each of these cell populations also expressed CD9, CD49f, and CD90, cell surface proteins previously associated with testicular progenitors but also widely reported to be expressed on MSCs [61, 62]. It has been previously reported that SSEA1-positive human umbilical cord-derived MSCs were able to differentiate towards germ cell-like cells . Studies on testis-derived VSELs in a mouse model demonstrated their capacity to differentiate to spermatozoa in vitro . Our results would suggest that the SSEA4-positive subpopulation of HUCPVCs may be equivalent to VSELs, and gave rise to the germ cell lineage differentiation. However, future studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Another important phenotype of undifferentiated HUCPVCs that could explain the duality in their differentiation capacity (to Sertoli-like cells and germ-like cells) is their ability to secrete relevant cytokines and growth factors that promote differentiation to these lineages. In the testicular niche, Sertoli cells play a major role in germ cell differentiation via paracrine secretion of several growth factors. A pivotal growth factor in this process is BMP4  that is secreted by Sertoli cells and activates the SMAD signaling network in germ cells . Previous studies aiming at germ cell differentiation from various sources have supplemented culture media with BMP4 [63, 66, 67], which was not added in our protocol. However, we identified BMP4 as one of the major proteins secreted by undifferentiated HUCPVCs under our growth conditions. Other growth factors that are important in the testicular niche including LIF, GDNF, and FGF2 [12, 49] were also found to be secreted by undifferentiated HUCPVCs; however, supplementation of the differentiation media with these factors appeared to be required for the differentiation of HUCPVCs into germ cell-like cells suggesting that their paracrine properties may be altered under differentiation media conditions (data not shown).
In addition to the heterogeneity and secretory properties of HUCPVCs, we suggest that the growth conditions used in the current study contributed to the differentiation outcome. Similar signaling pathways and growth factors regulate both Sertoli cell and germ cell development . For example retinoic acid (RA), introduced from Step 1 to Step 3, has been demonstrated to induce both the expression of the early germ-specific genes, such as Stra8, Dazl, and Mvh, and prolonged activation of Smad1/5 in mouse embryonic stem cells . Furthermore, RA promotes Sertoli cell differentiation and antagonizes activin-induced proliferation . RA is also important in the stimulation of germ cells to enter meiosis in the developing mouse ovary. It was also suggested that RA might regulate meiotic progression in the pubertal testis .
Our differentiation protocol was designed to mimic physiological spermatogenesis, which is known to take place over 64 days in the human testis. While many parameters of this complex network of events remain unclear, we utilized a novel in vitro model in an attempt to recapitulate the well-defined in vivo stages of spermatogenesis. The small round cells that emerged over the first 3 weeks in culture expressed spermatogonial germ cell-associated markers and were initially diploid (data not shown). To test whether the round cells that were derived after the first three steps of the protocol were spermatogonial stem cells we used the transplantation assay. Engraftment of approximately 5–7% of cells injected in a murine xenograft model at Step 3 suggests that this functional property of SSCs has been induced in our culture system. Although the transplantation assays provide evidence that we were able to derive functional spermatogonia-like cells, under our original conditions these cells could not differentiate any further. The meiotic development of haploid cells occurred under new conditions during weeks 4 and 5. We were able to demonstrate the emergence of gene transcription, protein expression, and morphological changes leading to cells that resembled in vivo human spermatid and spermatocyte differentiation to a degree beyond what has been previously obtained from similar cell sources. As such, this study could contribute to future studies aiming at deriving functional male gametes from HUCPVCs, which we do not claim to have derived here. While we cannot account for cell proliferation in the early steps of differentiation and the loss of differentiated cells at all steps, we estimate that our differentiation efficiency represents approximately 1–3% of the starting cell population.
In the current study, we used two types of HUCPVCs, derived from term and from first trimester umbilical cords. We hypothesized that FTM HUCPVCs, because of their more primitive origins, might possess a broader differentiation capacity as we have previously reported for other lineages. Generally, both cell types demonstrated the same differentiation capacity. However, our qPCR and flow cytometry data suggest that FTM HUCPVCs differentiated faster and more efficiently than term HUCPVCs towards the germ cell lineage. In addition, DAZL (a marker of early germ cells) and SYCP3 (a marker of first meiosis) were both downregulated to a greater degree in FTM HUCPVCs compared to term HUCPVCs at Steps 4 and 5, and this was paralleled by an increased percentage of haploid cell development when compared to term HUCPVCs.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates the true plasticity and heterogeneity of human umbilical cord perivascular cells which supports their potential for use in male gonadal regenerative therapy applications, including in vitro models of spermatogenesis. Such models would consider the reciprocal relationship between germ cells and their microenvironment (Sertoli cells), thereby mimicking spermatogenesis, and could be used to develop cellular therapies for conditions such as nonobstructive azoospermia. Finally, the paracrine properties of these cells could be harnessed to maintain SSCs or promote their ex vivo/in vivo differentiation in fertility preservation and restoration applications.
We thank Kevin Quach (CReATe Fertility Centre) for his assistance with the REB approval process. We thank Dr. Kirk Lo and colleagues (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto) for their assistance in the procurement of testicular tissue for the positive controls included in the supplementary materials. We thank Naazish Alladin, Peter Szaraz, Pamela Kurjanowicz (CReATe Fertility Centre), Seok-Ho Hong (Kangwon National University, South Korea), and Liran Shlush (University Health Network, Toronto) for their technical assistance.
This work was funded by CReATe Program Inc.
Availability of data and materials
ES and CLL co-conceived the study. ES performed the majority of experiments related to the differentiation protocol and endpoint assessments. LM, TB, and SS contributed to the experimental execution of HUCPVC cell culture, qPCR, ELISAs, and FISH. ES, SK, and AGF performed data analysis. ES, AGF, and CLL co-wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the study design, and revised and approved the manuscript.
CLL has filed patent applications in Canada, the USA, and Australia for the invention entitled “Method of isolation and use of cells derived from first trimester umbilical cord tissue”. The applications have been approved in Australia and are pending in the USA and Canada. CLL is the owner and director of the CReATe Cord Blood Bank and Peristem™ program. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Informed consent included the consent for publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Independent research ethics board approval was obtained for the collection of human umbilical cord (REB No. 454-2011, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; REB No. 28889, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada) and human testicular tissue obtained from orchiectomies performed at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada (REB No. 30252, University of Toronto and REB No. 14-0032-E Mount Sinai Hospital for this study). Human granulosa cells (GLCs) and spermatozoa were each obtained from CReATe Fertility Centre patients (University of Toronto REB No. 29237 and REB No. 29211, respectively).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Sato T, Katagiri K, Gohbara A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Ogura A, Kubota Y, Ogawa T. In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature. 2011;471(7339):504–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of germ cells from rabbits and dogs into mouse testes. Biol Reprod. 1999;61(5):1331–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hermann BP, Sukhwani M, Winkler F, Pascarella JN, Peters KA, Sheng Y, Valli H, Rodriguez M, Ezzelarab M, Dargo G, et al. Spermatogonial stem cell transplantation into rhesus testes regenerates spermatogenesis producing functional sperm. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11(5):715–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Easley CA, Phillips BT, McGuire MM, Barringer JM, Valli H, Hermann BP, Simerly CR, Rajkovic A, Miki T, Orwig KE, et al. Direct differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into haploid spermatogenic cells. Cell Rep. 2012;2(3):440–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chuang CY, Lin KI, Hsiao M, Stone L, Chen HF, Huang YH, Lin SP, Ho HN, Kuo HC. Meiotic competent human germ cell-like cells derived from human embryonic stem cells induced by BMP4/WNT3A signaling and OCT4/EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) selection. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(18):14389–401.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eguizabal C, Montserrat N, Vassena R, Barragan M, Garreta E, Garcia-Quevedo L, Vidal F, Giorgetti A, Veiga A, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Complete meiosis from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells. 2011;29(8):1186–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geens M, Sermon KD, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H. Sertoli cell-conditioned medium induces germ cell differentiation in human embryonic stem cells. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(5):471–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pera RA. Status of human germ cell differentiation from pluripotent stem cells. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013;25(2):396–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xuemei L, Jing Y, Bei X, Juan H, Xinling R, Qun L, Guijin Z. Retinoic acid improve germ cell differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(11):905–12.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kjartansdottir KR, Reda A, Panula S, Day K, Hultenby K, Soder O, Hovatta O, Stukenborg JB. A combination of culture conditions and gene expression analysis can be used to investigate and predict hES cell differentiation potential towards male gonadal cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144029.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fang F, Ni K, Xiong CL. Induced pluripotent stem cells in spermatogenesis: progress in current studies. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2015;21(10):925–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oatley JM, Brinster RL. The germline stem cell niche unit in mammalian testes. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(2):577–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Clermont Y, Leblond CP. Spermiogenesis of man, monkey, ram and other mammals as shown by the periodic acid-Schiff technique. Am J Anat. 1955;96(2):229–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiarini-Garcia H, Russell LD. High-resolution light microscopic characterization of mouse spermatogonia. Biol Reprod. 2001;65(4):1170–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoshida S, Sukeno M, Nakagawa T, Ohbo K, Nagamatsu G, Suda T, Nabeshima Y. The first round of mouse spermatogenesis is a distinctive program that lacks the self-renewing spermatogonia stage. Development. 2006;133(8):1495–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brehm R, Steger K. Regulation of Sertoli cell and germ cell differentation. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2005;181:1–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karl J, Capel B. Sertoli cells of the mouse testis originate from the coelomic epithelium. Dev Biol. 1998;203(2):323–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mancini RE, Narbaitz R, Lavieri JC. Origin and development of the germinative epithelium and Sertoli cells in the human testis: cytological, cytochemical, and quantitative study. Anat Rec. 1960;136:477–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byskov AG. Differentiation of mammalian embryonic gonad. Physiol Rev. 1986;66(1):71–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wartenberg H. Human testicular development and the role of the mesonephros in the origin of a dual Sertoli cell system. Andrologia. 1978;10(1):1–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wartenberg H, Kinsky I, Viebahn C, Schmolke C. Fine structural characteristics of testicular cord formation in the developing rabbit gonad. J Electron Microsc Tech. 1991;19(2):133–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hong SH, Maghen L, Kenigsbcerg S, Teichert AM, Rammeloo AW, Shlush E, Szaraz P, Pereira S, Lulat A, Xiao R, et al. Ontogeny of human umbilical cord perivascular cells: molecular and fate potential changes during gestation. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22(17):2425–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarugaser R, Ennis J, Stanford WL, Davies JE. Isolation, propagation, and characterization of human umbilical cord perivascular cells (HUCPVCs). Methods Mol Biol. 2009;482:269–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang S, Bo J, Hu H, Guo X, Tian R, Sun C, Zhu Y, Li P, Liu P, Zou S, et al. Derivation of male germ cells from induced pluripotent stem cells in vitro and in reconstituted seminiferous tubules. Cell Prolif. 2012;45(2):91–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Easley CA, Miki T, Castro CA, Ozolek JA, Minervini CF, Ben-Yehudah A, Schatten GP. Human amniotic epithelial cells are reprogrammed more efficiently by induced pluripotency than adult fibroblasts. Cell Reprog. 2012;14(3):193–203.Google Scholar
- Montserrat N, Garreta E, Gonzalez F, Gutierrez J, Eguizabal C, Ramos V, Borros S, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Simple generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells using poly-beta-amino esters as the non-viral gene delivery system. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(14):12417–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li P, Hu H, Yang S, Tian R, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Ma M, Zhu Y, Guo X, Huang Y, et al. Differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into male germ cells in vitro through embryoid body formation and retinoic acid or testosterone induction. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:608728.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- White MG, Huang YS, Tres LL, Kierszenbaum AL. Structural and functional aspects of cultured epididymal epithelial cells isolated from pubertal rats. J Reprod Fertil. 1982;66(2):475–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa T, Arechaga JM, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of testis germinal cells into mouse seminiferous tubules. Int J Dev Biol. 1997;41(1):111–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Petit JM, Ratinaud MH, Cordelli E, Spano M, Julien R. Mouse testis cell sorting according to DNA and mitochondrial changes during spermatogenesis. Cytometry. 1995;19(4):304–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JF, Yango P, Altman E, Choudhry S, Poelzl A, Zamah AM, Rosen M, Klatsky PC, Tran ND. Testicular niche required for human spermatogonial stem cell expansion. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(9):1043–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chikhovskaya JV, van Daalen SK, Korver CM, Repping S, van Pelt AM. Mesenchymal origin of multipotent human testis-derived stem cells in human testicular cell cultures. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(2):155–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zohni K, Zhang X, Tan SL, Chan P, Nagano M. CD9 is expressed on human male germ cells that have a long-term repopulation potential after transplantation into mouse testes. Biol Reprod. 2012;87(2):27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medrano JV, Ramathal C, Nguyen HN, Simon C, Reijo Pera RA. Divergent RNA-binding proteins, DAZL and VASA, induce meiotic progression in human germ cells derived in vitro. Stem Cells. 2011;30(3):441–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park TS, Galic Z, Conway AE, Lindgren A, van Handel BJ, Magnusson M, Richter L, Teitell MA, Mikkola HK, Lowry WE, et al. Derivation of primordial germ cells from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells is significantly improved by coculture with human fetal gonadal cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(4):783–95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Xu EY, Moore FL, Pera RA. A gene family required for human germ cell development evolved from an ancient meiotic gene conserved in metazoans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(13):7414–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Maki CB, Pacchiarotti J, Ramos T, Pascual M, Pham J, Kinjo J, Anorve S, Izadyar F. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of spermatogonial stem cells in adult primate testes. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(6):1480–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gassei K, Ehmcke J, Dhir R, Schlatt S. Magnetic activated cell sorting allows isolation of spermatogonia from adult primate testes and reveals distinct GFRa1-positive subpopulations in men. J Med Primatol. 2009;39(2):83–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagano M, Patrizio P, Brinster RL. Long-term survival of human spermatogonial stem cells in mouse testes. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(6):1225–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anand S, Bhartiya D, Sriraman K, Mallick A. Underlying mechanisms that restore spermatogenesis on transplanting healthy niche cells in busulphan treated mouse testis. Stem Cell Rev. 2016;12(6):682–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hua J, Pan S, Yang C, Dong W, Dou Z, Sidhu KS. Derivation of male germ cell-like lineage from human fetal bone marrow stem cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(1):99–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hua J, Zhu H, Pan S, Liu C, Sun J, Ma X, Dong W, Liu W, Li W. Pluripotent male germline stem cells from goat fetal testis and their survival in mouse testis. Cell Reprogram. 2011;13(2):133–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lue Y, Erkkila K, Liu PY, Ma K, Wang C, Hikim AS, Swerdloff RS. Fate of bone marrow stem cells transplanted into the testis: potential implication for men with testicular failure. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(3):899–908.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kashani IR, Zarnani AH, Soleimani M, Abdolvahabi MA, Nayernia K, Shirazi R. Retinoic acid induces mouse bone marrow-derived CD15+, Oct4+ and CXCR4+ stem cells into male germ-like cells in a two-dimensional cell culture system. Cell Biol Int. 2014;38(6):782–9. doi:10.1002/cbin.10260.
- Kent J, Wheatley SC, Andrews JE, Sinclair AH, Koopman P. A male-specific role for SOX9 in vertebrate sex determination. Development. 1996;122(9):2813–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-germ cell interactions and their significance in germ cell movement in the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(5):747–806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bockers TM, Nieschlag E, Kreutz MR, Bergmann M. Localization of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) immunoreactivity and hormone receptor mRNA in testicular tissue of infertile men. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;278(3):595–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann MC. GDNF signaling pathways within the mammalian spermatogonial stem cell niche. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008;288(1-2):95–103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grima J, Pineau C, Bardin CW, Cheng CY. Rat Sertoli cell clusterin, alpha 2-macroglobulin, and testins: biosynthesis and differential regulation by germ cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992;89(1-2):127–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chui K, Trivedi A, Cheng CY, Cherbavaz DB, Dazin PF, Huynh AL, Mitchell JB, Rabinovich GA, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, John CM. Characterization and functionality of proliferative human Sertoli cells. Cell Transplant. 2011;20(5):619–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ying Y, Liu XM, Marble A, Lawson KA, Zhao GQ. Requirement of BMP8b for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14(7):1053–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Can A, Karahuseyinoglu S. Concise review: human umbilical cord stroma with regard to the source of fetus-derived stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25(11):2886–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ying Y, Zhao GQ. Cooperation of endoderm-derived BMP2 and extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 in primordial germ cell generation in the mouse. Dev Biol. 2001;232(2):484–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujiwara T, Dunn NR, Hogan BL. Bone morphogenetic protein 4 in the extraembryonic mesoderm is required for allantois development and the localization and survival of primordial germ cells in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(24):13739–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lawson KA, Dunn NR, Roelen BA, Zeinstra LM, Davis AM, Wright CV, Korving JP, Hogan BL. BMP4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 1999;13(4):424–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bhartiya D. Are mesenchymal cells indeed pluripotent stem cells or just stromal cells? OCT-4 and VSELs biology has led to better understanding. Stem Cells Int. 2013;2013:547501.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bhartiya D, Shaikh A, Anand S, Patel H, Kapoor S, Sriraman K, Parte S, Unni S. Endogenous, very small embryonic-like stem cells: critical review, therapeutic potential and a look ahead. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;23(1):41–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ratajczak MZ, Suszynska M, Pedziwiatr D, Mierzejewska K, Greco NJ. Umbilical cord blood-derived very small embryonic like stem cells (VSELs) as a source of pluripotent stem cells for regenerative medicine. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2012;9(3):639–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duya P, Bian Y, Chu X, Zhang Y. Stem cells for reprogramming: could hUMSCs be a better choice? Cytotechnology. 2013;65(3):335–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hass R, Kasper C, Bohm S, Jacobs R. Different populations and sources of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC): a comparison of adult and neonatal tissue-derived MSC. Cell Commun Signal. 2011;9:12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lv FJ, Tuan RS, Cheung KM, Leung VY. Concise review: the surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32(6):1408–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li N, Pan S, Zhu H, Mu H, Liu W, Hua J. BMP4 promotes SSEA-1(+) hUC-MSC differentiation into male germ-like cells in vitro. Cell Prolif. 2014;47(4):299–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anand S, Patel H, Bhartiya D. Chemoablated mouse seminiferous tubular cells enriched for very small embryonic-like stem cells undergo spontaneous spermatogenesis in vitro. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pellegrini M, Grimaldi P, Rossi P, Geremia R, Dolci S. Developmental expression of BMP4/ALK3/SMAD5 signaling pathway in the mouse testis: a potential role of BMP4 in spermatogonia differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 16):3363–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Latifpour M, Shakiba Y, Amidi F, Mazaheri Z, Sobhani A. Differentiation of human umbilical cord matrix-derived mesenchymal stem cells into germ-like cells. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2014;6(4):218–27.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Amidi F, Ataie Nejad N, Agha Hoseini M, Nayernia K, Mazaheri Z, Yamini N, Saeednia S. In vitro differentiation process of human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells to male germ cells in the presence of gonadal and non-gonadal conditioned media with retinoic acid. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2015;51(10):1093–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugimoto R, Nabeshima Y, Yoshida S. Retinoic acid metabolism links the periodical differentiation of germ cells with the cycle of Sertoli cells in mouse seminiferous epithelium. Mech Dev. 2012;128(11-12):610–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Jia W, Wang K, Zhou Q, Leng Y, Duan T, Kang J. Retinoic acid regulates germ cell differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells through a Smad-dependent pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;418(3):571–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lucas TF, Nascimento AR, Pisolato R, Pimenta MT, Lazari MF, Porto CS. Receptors and signaling pathways involved in proliferation and differentiation of Sertoli cells. Spermatogenesis. 2014;4:e28138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Raverdeau M, Gely-Pernot A, Feret B, Dennefeld C, Benoit G, Davidson I, Chambon P, Mark M, Ghyselinck NB. Retinoic acid induces Sertoli cell paracrine signals for spermatogonia differentiation but cell autonomously drives spermatocyte meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(41):16582–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar