Novel mechanism for mesenchymal stem cells in attenuating peritoneal adhesion: accumulating in the lung and secreting tumor necrosis factor α-stimulating gene-6
- Nan Wang†1, 2,
- Yeqing Shao†3,
- Yan Mei1,
- Li Zhang1,
- Qinggang Li1,
- Diangeng Li1,
- Suozhu Shi1,
- Quan Hong1,
- Hongli Lin4Email author and
- Xiangmei Chen1Email author
© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 21 August 2012
Accepted: 4 December 2012
Published: 6 December 2012
We previously found that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) injected intravenously could attenuate peritoneal adhesion by secreting tumor necrosis alpha-stimulating gene (TSG)-6, while MSCs injected intraperitoneally could not. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the means by which MSCs exert their effects.
Rat bone marrow-derived MSCs/red fluorescent protein (RFP) were injected either intraperitoneally or intravenously into Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats at different time points after peritoneal scraping. Peritoneal adhesions were evaluated macroscopically at day 14 after scraping. The distribution of MSCs injected intraperitoneally or intravenously was traced by two-photon fluorescence confocal imaging and immunofluorescence microscopy. The co-localization of MSCs and macrophages in the lung and the spleen, and the expression of TSG-6 in MSCs trapped in the lung or the spleen were evaluated by immunofluorescence microscopy. The concentration of TSG-6 in serum was evaluated by ELISA. After intravenous injection of TSG-6- small interfering (si) RNA-MSCs, the expression of TSG-6 in MSCs and the concentration of TSG-6 in serum were reevaluated, and peritoneal adhesions were evaluated macroscopically and histologically.
MSCs injected intraperitoneally failed to reduce peritoneal adhesion, and MSCs injected intravenously markedly improved peritoneal adhesion. Two-photon fluorescence confocal imaging showed that MSCs injected intravenously accumulated mainly in the lung, where they remained for seven days, and immunofluorescence microscopy showed few MSCs phagocytosed by macrophages. In contrast, large numbers of MSCs accumulated in the spleen with obvious phagocytosis by macrophages even at 4 hours after intraperitoneal injection. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that MSCs that accumulated in the lung after intravenous injection could express TSG-6 within 12 hours, but TSG-6-siRNA-MSCs or MSCs accumulated in the spleen after intraperitoneal injection did not. ELISA showed that the concentration of TSG-6 in serum was increased at 4 hours after intravenous injection of MSCs, while there was no increase after injection of TSG-6-siRNA-MSCs or after intraperitoneal injection of MSCs. Moreover, intravenous injection of TSG-6-siRNA-MSCs failed to attenuate peritoneal adhesion.
Our findings suggest that intravenously injected MSCs accumulated in the lung and attenuated peritoneal adhesion by secreting TSG-6, but intraperitoneally injected MSCs were phagocytosed by macrophages in the spleen and failed to attenuate peritoneal adhesion.
Studies demonstrate that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can repair injuries [1, 2] and decrease fibrosis in the heart , lung  and kidney . However, the mechanisms remain controversial. Researchers believe that the effect is mediated by an increase in mitogenic , anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, immunosuppressive and anti-fibrogenic factors [2, 7], as well as differentiation into specific cells .
Peritoneal fibrosis and adhesion are the major causes of ultrafiltration failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients , and postoperative peritoneal adhesions  are also problematic. We previously found that MSCs injected intravenously attenuated peritoneal adhesion by repairing mesothelial cells, as well as reducing inflammation and fibrosis. Rather than the engraftment, the secretion of multifunctional anti-inflammatory TNFα-stimulating gene (TSG)-6 by MSCs plays a major role in this effect  but MSCs injected intraperitoneally failed to attenuate peritoneal adhesion. Studies have shown that MSCs injected intraperitoneally are activated by the inflammatory microenvironment of the peritoneal cavity to secrete TSG-6 and attenuate peritonitis induced by zymosan in mice . Another study found that both intraperitoneal and intravenous injection of MSCs suppress corneal inflammation in rats by secreting TSG-6 . Our findings were inconsistent with these studies. We do not have direct evidence that MSCs injected intravenously can secrete TSG-6 and exert effects on the injured peritoneum.
The aim of this research was to investigate the way in which MSCs exert their effects on peritoneal adhesion and to specify the causes for the failure of MSCs injected intraperitoneally. We demonstrated that intravenously injected MSCs accumulated in the lung and attenuated peritoneal adhesion by secreting TSG-6 into the blood, while intraperitoneally injected MSCs were phagocytosed by splenic macrophages.
Acute peritoneal adhesion rat models
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army (Permit Number: 2010-X-3-28) with animal care performed strictly according to established institutional guidelines. All surgery was performed under pentobarbital anesthesia. Scrape-induced peritoneal adhesions were created in healthy male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats weighing 200 g to 250 g. All animals were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences (Beijing, China) and housed at constant room temperature with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Standard rodent chow and water were provided ad libitum. The animals were acclimated for seven days before initiating the experiment.
Surgical procedures were conducted by a single surgeon under aseptic conditions in the Laboratory Animal Unit. Rats were anesthetized with a 2% pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. Briefly, a 2-cm vertical midline incision was made into the abdominal wall and peritoneum. The dorsal and ventral surfaces of the cecum were scraped with dry gauze 20 times over an area of 2 × 2 cm2 until petechial bleeding occurred, and the cecum was then replaced. The parietal peritoneum lateral to the midline incision was scraped 20 times until petechial bleeding occurred. The incision was closed in two layers with 4/0 silk sutures . After surgery, the rats were kept in a single cage and fed a normal diet.
SD rat bone marrow-derived MSCs/red fluorescent protein (RFP) was obtained commercially (Cyagen Biosciences, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The culture was initiated following the manufacturer's instructions. MSCs were placed into 25 cm2 culture flasks and cultured with MSCs growth medium (Cyagen Biosciences, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 37°C under 5% CO2 and 90% humidity. The medium was changed every three days. Sixth to eighth passage MSCs were used for the experiments. Following previous methods , fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used to examine the representative markers of MSCs (CD45, CD90 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, California, USA); CD11a, CD54 (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK)), and multilineage differentiation of MSCs was examined under adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation conditions.
Transfection of MSCs with TSG-6 small interfering RNA (siRNA)
Fifty-percent confluent MSCs were transfected with 20 nM TSG-6-small interfering (si) RNA or the siRNA-negative control (NC) (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) using INTERFERin™(Polyplus-transfection SA, Bioparc, France). At 24 hours after transfection, MSCs were fed with serum-free medium for 24 hours, prior to experiments. To confirm the knockdown of TSG-6, RNA was assayed for TSG-6 by RT-PCR (TSG-6 forward primer: AGTGATGCGTCCGTCACAGCC, reverse primer: AGATGGCTAAACCGTCCAGCTAAGA, product length = 134 bp; GAPDH forward primer: GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG, reverse primer: TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC, product length = 87 bp (SBS Genetech, Beijing, China)), and the protein was assayed for TSG-6 by Western blot (primary antibodies TSG-6 (1:50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA)).
Injection of MSCs or recombinant mouse (rm) TSG-6
At 0, 4, 12, 24, or 48 hours after peritoneal scraping, MSCs (5 × 106) in 1-ml serum-free medium were injected via the tail vein or peritoneum. At 24 hours after peritoneal scraping, TSG-6-siRNA-MSCs, TSG-6-siRNA-NC-MSCs or 3 ng/ml rmTSG-6 (97% homology with rat ) (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) in 1-ml serum-free medium (adapted from our previous experiment ) were injected via the tail vein. Rats injected with the serum-free medium were the negative control, and the rats without peritoneal scraping were the blank control.
Two-photon fluorescence confocal imaging of MSCs after injection
A Leica two-photon fluorescence confocal imaging TCS SP5 system (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) was used to evaluate the distribution of MSCs after injection. The excitation and emission filter set for green (autofluorescence) detection was 488 nm and 504 to 569 nm, respectively. The excitation and emission filter set for red detection was 543 nm and 555 to 624 nm, respectively. MSCs were injected into rats intraperitoneally or intravenously at 24 hours after scraping. Rats were sacrificed at 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours and 5, 7 days thereafter (n = 3 in each group at each time point). Fresh thick tissues of the right lung, right lower liver, spleen, and scraped peritoneum were sampled.
Immunofluorescence staining of lung and spleen
MSCs, TSG-6-siRNA-MSCs, or TSG-6-siRNA-NC-MSCs were injected into rats intraperitoneally or intravenously at 24 hours after scraping. Rats were sacrificed at 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 5, 7 days thereafter (n = 3 in each group at each time point). The right lung and the spleen were sampled. Specimens were embedded in optimum cutting temperature (OCT) compound and stored at -80°C until use. Frozen tissues were sectioned every 4 μm and placed on poly-L-lysine precoated slides. The slides were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 minutes at room temperature, and for 10 minutes at 4°C. The slides were then blocked with 1% BSA for 30 minutes at room temperature. The following primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C: ED-1 (1:50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and TSG-6 (1:50) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-30140). Secondary antibodies conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) were applied for 1 hour at room temperature in a darkened humidified chamber. Finally, the preparations were mounted in fluorescent mounting medium with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Negative controls did not receive the first antibody. Each tissue section was observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FluoView 1000, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications of × 600 and × 1800. Three-dimensional imaging was applied, if necessary.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of TSG-6 in rat serum
Rats were sacrificed at 4, 12, 24, 48, or 72 hours, or 5, 7, 14 days after MSCs, TSG-6-siRNA-MSCs, or TSG-6-siRNA-NC-MSCs injection intravenously at 24 hours after scraping (n = 3 in each group at each time point). Quantification of TSG-6 in serum was performed by ELISA according to the conventional procedure. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). TSG-6 concentrations were determined with a standard curve constructed by titrating rmTSG-6. All samples were placed in three replicate wells. A laboratory-made ELISA kit was prepared mainly as follows: a 96-well microplate (Corning, Lowell, MA, USA) was coated with mouse monoclonal antibody to TSG-6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-377277), enzyme-labeled secondary antibody was purchased from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). The correlation coefficiency was 0.995 for the standard curves.
Macroscopic evaluation of peritoneal adhesions
At 0, 4, 12, 24, or 48 hours after peritoneal scraping, MSCs were injected intraperitoneally. At 24 hours after scraping, MSCs or rmTSG-6 were injected intravenously. Rats were sacrificed on day 14 after scraping (n = 6 in each group at each time point). The size and severity of peritoneal adhesions were evaluated macroscopically by an independent observer on a scale of 0 to 4 (0, 0%; 1, <25%; 2, 25% to 49%; 3, 50% to 74%; and 4, 75% to 100% adhesions) using a previously reported scoring system .
Histological analysis of peritoneal adhesions
Rats were sacrificed on day 14 after scraping (n = 6 in each group at each time point). The entire fibrous band was sampled. Specimens were fixed in 10% formaldehyde for 24 hours. After dehydration, they were embedded in paraffin, and 3-μm thick cross-sections were stained with Masson's trichrome. Each tissue section was examined by light microscopy (Olympus IX71, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications of × 100 and × 400. Five randomly selected fields in each section were evaluated by an independent pathologist (at a magnification of × 100). The extent of fibrosis was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (medium), or 3 (intensive).
Analysis was done using SPSS Statistics, version 17.0.2. Results are presented as mean values ± standard deviations. Multiple comparisons of parametric data were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Nonparametric data were compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test to identify differences between groups. A value of P <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results and discussion
MSCs injected intraperitoneally failed to attenuate peritoneal adhesion
It has become apparent that MSCs repair injured tissues without engraftment . In fact, MSCs secrete a number of cytokines and growth factors that alter the tissue microenvironment. In order to evaluate why MSCs injected intraperitoneally failed to function efficiently, we next investigated the differences in the distribution of intraperitoneally and intravenously injected MSCs.
MSCs injected intraperitoneally were phagocytosed by macrophages
Our findings were similar to our previous results when we used an in vivo imaging system to track the distribution of MSCs . The vast majority of MSCs injected intravenously accumulated in the lungs [18, 20]. This distribution may be due to the size of MSCs (20 μm to 30 μm) relative to pulmonary capillaries (14 μm in diameter), which may prevent MSCs from passing through the pulmonary circulation. Researchers found that MSCs injected intravenously into rat stroke models were transiently trapped in the lungs, then were sequestered in the spleen ; Minjie Lu et al. injected MSCs into the left anterior descending artery of a mini-pig with acute myocardial infarction, and found that the spleen was the main extracardial organ to trap MSCs . One study reported that MSCs were observed in the spleen after intraperitoneal injection , but no study has determined whether the trapped MSCs were intact.
ED-1 is a transmembrane protein restricted mainly to monocyte-macrophages. In macrophages, ED-1 is localized mainly in lysosomes and endosomes . We found that MSCs accumulated in the lung were generally of a normal size, and RFP could not co-localize with ED-1. We speculated that these MSCs were intact. While the MSCs accumulated in the spleen were generally fragmented, and most of the RFP could partly or wholly co-localize with ED-1. We speculated that these MSCs were damaged by local macrophages. It was interesting that macrophages in the lung did not alter the survival of MSCs. Several possible reasons may explain this phenomenon. First, MSCs accumulated in the interstitial areas of the lung. Unlike alveolar macrophages which have an active response with enough phagocytes to engulf particles , interstitial macrophages are transitional stages between blood macrophages and alveolar macrophages. Interstitial macrophages have a role in limiting inflammation and antigen presentation [25, 26]. While MSCs have low immunogenicity and may escape detection by the host immune system upon transplantation, MSCs may also inhibit the activation of macrophages [1, 27]. Second, monocyte-derivied macrophages have no proliferative potential in tissues. The macrophage population is maintained by the influx of monocytes from peripheral blood into tissues; the influx rate of monocytes is high in the spleen but low in the lungs . Thus, the function of macrophages in the lung may be relatively stable as they are exposed to fewer influences from peripheral blood. Instead of being phagocytosed by macrophages, MSCs accumulated in the lung might further translocate to the extrapulmonary regional lymph nodes after entering lymphatic capillaries . However, the means by which MSCs injected into the peritoneal cavity accumulated in the spleen shortly after injection remain unclear, as does why our results differed from those of previous studies. Further investigations must be performed to answer these questions.
MSCs accumulated in the lung after intravenous injection could express TSG-6
We previously examined the cytokine profile in serum-starved MSCs-conditioned medium and found that TSG-6 was released most abundantly. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, Fas ligand, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), inter-cellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, some inflammatory and chemotactic factors, were also released by MSCs . TSG-6 has multifunctional anti-inflammatory effects. Transgenic inactivation of the gene increased inflammation, and over-expression of the gene decreased inflammation . We found that TSG-6 secreted by MSCs inhibited inflammation and promoted the repair of mesothelial cells, subsequently reducing peritoneal adhesion . However, we had no direct evidence that MSCs could affect injured peritoneum from a distance. Some studies have reported that cells trapped in the lungs secrete soluble factors into the blood to enhance the repair of other tissues .
We previously found that acute inflammation of injured peritoneum peaked at 12 to 24 hours after scraping and the optimal benefit was attained when MSCs were injected at 24 hours after scraping . Therefore, the anti-inflammatory effects of TSG-6 secreted by inflammation-stimulated MSCs were important for their benefits. MSCs accumulated in the lung transiently secreted TSG-6 into the blood, resulting in inhibition of the excessive inflammation of injured peritoneum, which in turn stimulated more weakly the secretion of TSG-6 by MSCs. While the secretion of TSG-6 in the control group increased 48 hours after peritoneal scraping, it might not inhibit the active inflammation efficiently and, thus, failed to reduce peritoneal adhesions.
We found that intraperitoneally injected MSCs were damaged by macrophages in the spleen and did not express or secrete TSG-6 into the blood. So TSG-6 secreted by live MSCs may be a key player that attenuates peritoneal adhesion. These findings may explain the questions we stated at the beginning of this paper.
MSCs injected intravenously attenuated peritoneal adhesion by secreting TSG-6
TSG-6 is a hyaluronan (HA)-binding glycoprotein with multifunctional anti-inflammatory effects. MSCs can block the recruitment of neutrophils by secreting TSG-6  via a CD44/HA/TSG-6 mediated blocking mechanism . Research found that neutrophils of thioglycollate-induced peritonitis were higher in TSG-6-deficient animals than in wild-type animals, but were dramatically suppressed by intravenous injection of rmTSG-6 . MSCs may be activated by an inflammatory microenvironment to secrete TSG-6. In addition, TSG-6/HA/CD44 activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway  and enhances the migration and proliferation of injured cells . TSG-6-mediated formation of heavy chain-HA complexes is also involved in remodeling extracellular matrix and regulating cell migration and proliferation [31, 33]. We suggest that TSG-6 secreted by MSCs could protect the injured peritoneum from excessive inflammatory response and promote the repair of mesothelial cells, thus reducing the formation of fibrosis .
Our findings suggest that intravenously injected MSCs may accumulate in the lung and attenuate peritoneal adhesion by secreting TSG-6, while intraperitoneally injected MSCs fail to attenuate peritoneal adhesion probably due to phagocytosis by splenic macrophages.
one-way analysis of variance
bovine serum albumin
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
fluorescence-activated cell sorting
inter-cellular adhesion molecule
mitogen-activated protein kinase
mesenchymal stem cells
red fluorescent protein
reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
small interfering RNA
vascular endothelial growth factor.
This research was supported by a grant (2011AA020115) from the National High Technology Research and Development Program, a grant (2011CB964904) from the National Basic Research Program of China, a grant (2011BA110B08) from the National Key Technology R&D Program, and a grant (201002010) from the Health Industry Scientific Research Special Project.
- Bunnell BA, Betancourt AM, Sullivan DE: New concepts on the immune modulation mediated by mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010, 1: 34-10.1186/scrt34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson WM, Nesti LJ, Tuan RS: Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for attenuation of scar formation during wound healing. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012, 3: 20-10.1186/scrt111.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagaya N, Kangawa K, Itoh T, Iwase T, Murakami S, Miyahara Y, Fujii T, Uematsu M, Ohgushi H, Yamagishi M, Tokudome T, Mori H, Miyatake K, Kitamura S: Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac function in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2005, 112: 1128-1135. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.500447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ortiz LA, Gambelli F, McBride C, Gaupp D, Baddoo M, Kaminski N, Phinney DG: Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 8407-8411. 10.1073/pnas.1432929100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ninichuk V, Gross O, Segerer S, Hoffmann R, Radomska E, Buchstaller A, Huss R, Akis N, Schlondorff D, Anders HJ: Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells reduce interstitial fibrosis but do not delay progression of chronic kidney disease in collagen4A3-deficient mice. Kidney Int. 2006, 70: 121-129. 10.1038/sj.ki.5001521.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Ni A, Dzau VJ: Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ Res. 2008, 103: 1204-1219. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176826.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gnecchi M, He H, Liang OD, Melo LG, Morello F, Mu H, Noiseux N, Zhang L, Pratt RE, Ingwall JS, Dzau VJ: Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2005, 11: 367-368. 10.1038/nm0405-367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon BS, Moon JH, Jun EK, Kim J, Maeng I, Kim JS, Lee JH, Baik CS, Kim A, Cho KS, Lee HH, Whang KY, You S: Secretory profiles and wound healing effects of human amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19: 887-902. 10.1089/scd.2009.0138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aroeira LS, Lara-Pezzi E, Loureiro J, Aguilera A, Ramirez-Huesca M, Gonzalez-Mateo G, Perez-Lozano ML, Albar-Vizcaino P, Bajo MA, del Peso G, Sanchez-Tomero JA, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Selgas R, Lopez-Cabrera M: Cyclooxygenase-2 mediates dialysate-induced alterations of the peritoneal membrane. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 20: 582-592. 10.1681/ASN.2008020211.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo Q, Li QF, Liu HJ, Li R, Wu CT, Wang LS: Sphingosine kinase 1 gene transfer reduces postoperative peritoneal adhesion in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2008, 95: 252-258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang N, Li Q, Zhang L, Lin H, Hu J, Li D, Shi S, Cui S, Zhou J, Ji J, Wan J, Cai G, Chen X: Mesenchymal stem cells attenuate peritoneal injury through secretion of TSG-6. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e43768-10.1371/journal.pone.0043768.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi H, Lee RH, Bazhanov N, Oh JY, Prockop DJ: Anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6 secreted by activated MSCs attenuates zymosan-induced mouse peritonitis by decreasing TLR2/NF-κB signaling in resident macrophages. Blood. 2011, 118: 330-338. 10.1182/blood-2010-12-327353.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roddy GW, Oh JY, Lee RH, Bartosh TJ, Ylostalo J, Coble K, Rosa RH, Prockop DJ: Action at a distance: systemically administered adult stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) reduce inflammatory damage to the cornea without engraftment and primarily by secretion of TNF-alpha stimulated gene/protein 6. Stem Cells. 2011, 29: 1572-1579. 10.1002/stem.708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guo H, Leung JC, Cheung JS, Chan LY, Wu EX, Lai KN: Non-viral Smad7 gene delivery and attenuation of postoperative peritoneal adhesion in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 2009, 96: 1323-1335. 10.1002/bjs.6722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li L, Zhang Y, Li Y, Yu B, Xu Y, Zhao S, Guan Z: Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation attenuates cardiac fibrosis associated with isoproterenol-induced global heart failure. Transpl Int. 2008, 21: 1181-1189. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00742.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- BLAST: Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi]
- Whang SH, Astudillo JA, Sporn E, Bachman SL, Miedema BW, Davis W, Thaler K: In search of the best peritoneal adhesion model: comparison of different techniques in a rat model. J Surg Res. 2011, 167: 245-250. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee RH, Pulin AA, Seo MJ, Kota DJ, Ylostalo J, Larson BL, Semprun-Prieto L, Delafontaine P, Prockop DJ: Intravenous hMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6. Cell Stem Cell. 2009, 5: 54-63. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helmchen F, Denk W: Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat Methods. 2005, 2: 932-940. 10.1038/nmeth818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischer UM, Harting MT, Jimenez F, Monzon-Posadas WO, Xue H, Savitz SI, Laine GA, Cox CS: Pulmonary passage is a major obstacle for intravenous stem cell delivery: the pulmonary first-pass effect. Stem Cells Dev. 2009, 18: 683-692. 10.1089/scd.2008.0253.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Detante O, Moisan A, Dimastromatteo J, Richard MJ, Riou L, Grillon E, Barbier E, Desruet MD, De Fraipont F, Segebarth C, Jaillard A, Hommel M, Ghezzi C, Remy C: Intravenous administration of 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled human mesenchymal stem cells after stroke: in vivo imaging and biodistribution. Cell Transplant. 2009, 18: 1369-1379. 10.3727/096368909X474230.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu M, Zhao S, Liu Q, Jiang S, Song P, Qian H, Zhang Y, Ling J, Yan C, Cheng H, Ma N, Zhao H, Liu Y: Transplantation with autologous mesenchymal stem cells after acute myocardial infarction evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental study. J Thorac Imaging. 2012, 27: 125-135. 10.1097/RTI.0b013e31820446fa.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao J, Dennis JE, Muzic RF, Lundberg M, Caplan AI: The dynamic in vivo distribution of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells after infusion. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001, 169: 12-20. 10.1159/000047856.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ng HP, Chiang SC, Chi Y, Lee ST: Identification of macrosialin (CD68) on the surface of host macrophages as the receptor for the intercellular adhesive molecule (ICAM-L) of Leishmania amazonensis. Int J Parasitol. 2009, 39: 1539-1550. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehnert BE: Pulmonary and thoracic macrophage subpopulations and clearance of particles from the lung. Environ Health Perspect. 1992, 97: 17-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schneberger D, Aharonson-Raz K, Singh B: Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity and Toll-like receptors in the lung. Cell Tissue Res. 2011, 343: 97-106. 10.1007/s00441-010-1032-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V: Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008, 8: 726-736. 10.1038/nri2395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naito M: Macrophage heterogeneity in development and differentiation. Arch Histol Cytol. 1993, 56: 331-351. 10.1679/aohc.56.331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lesley J, Gal I, Mahoney DJ, Cordell MR, Rugg MS, Hyman R, Day AJ, Mikecz K: TSG-6 modulates the interaction between hyaluronan and cell surface CD44. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 25745-25754. 10.1074/jbc.M313319200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szanto S, Bardos T, Gal I, Glant TT, Mikecz K: Enhanced neutrophil extravasation and rapid progression of proteoglycan-induced arthritis in TSG-6-knockout mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2004, 50: 3012-3022. 10.1002/art.20655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selbi W, Day AJ, Rugg MS, Fulop C, de la Motte CA, Bowen T, Hascall VC, Phillips AO: Overexpression of hyaluronan synthase 2 alters hyaluronan distribution and function in proximal tubular epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006, 17: 1553-1567. 10.1681/ASN.2005080879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evanko SP, Tammi MI, Tammi RH, Wight TN: Hyaluronan-dependent pericellular matrix. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007, 59: 1351-1365. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al'Qteishat A, Gaffney J, Krupinski J, Rubio F, West D, Kumar S, Kumar P, Mitsios N, Slevin M: Changes in hyaluronan production and metabolism following ischaemic stroke in man. Brain. 2006, 129: 2158-2176. 10.1093/brain/awl139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.