Oxidative stress-induced Notch1 signaling promotes cardiogenic gene expression in mesenchymal stem cells
© Boopathy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 31 October 2012
Accepted: 8 April 2013
Published: 18 April 2013
Administration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) after myocardial infarction (MI) results in modest functional improvements. However; the effect of microenvironment changes after MI, such as elevated levels of oxidative stress on cardiogenic gene expression of MSCs, remains unclear.
MSCs were isolated from the bone marrow of adult rats and treated for 1 week with H2O2 (0.1 to 100 μM) or 48 hours with glucose oxidase (GOX; 0 to 5 mU/ml) to mimic long-term pulsed or short-term continuous levels of H2O2, respectively.
In 100 μM H2O2 or 5 mU/ml GOX-treated MSCs, mRNA expression of selected endothelial genes (Flt1, vWF, PECAM1), and early cardiac marker (nkx2-5, αMHC) increased significantly, whereas early smooth muscle markers (smooth muscle α-actin and sm22α) and fibroblast marker vimentin decreased, as measured with real-time PCR. Interestingly, mRNA expression and activity of the cell-surface receptor Notch1 were significantly increased, as were its downstream targets, Hes5 and Hey1. Co-treatment of MSCs with 100 μM H2O2 and a γ-secretase inhibitor that prevents Notch signaling abrogated the increase in cardiac and endothelial genes, while augmenting the decrease in smooth muscle markers. Further, on GOX treatment, a significant increase in Wnt11, a downstream target of Notch1, was observed. Similar results were obtained with adult rat cardiac-derived progenitor cells.
These data suggest that H2O2- or GOX-mediated oxidative stress upregulates Notch1 signaling, which promotes cardiogenic gene expression in adult stem/progenitor cells, possibly involving Wnt11. Modulating the balance between Notch activation and H2O2-mediated oxidative stress may lead to improved adult stem cell-based therapies for cardiac repair and regeneration.
KeywordsCardiac progenitor cells Gene expression Glucose oxidase Hydrogen peroxide Mesenchymal stem cells Notch1
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality . Among cardiovascular diseases, myocardial infarction (MI) leads to irreversible damage to the myocardium and progressive loss of function, eventually leading to heart failure. Although many therapies attempt to improve functionality of the heart, the only cure for heart failure is cardiac transplantation. Owing to low availability of donor hearts, newer treatments that restore tissue and function are greatly needed. Although studies have shown functional improvement on injection of various stem cells, the precise molecular mechanism responsible for the improvement is unclear. Accumulating lines of evidence indicate beneficial effects of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for treating MI in small- and large-animal studies . Whereas MSCs are capable of differentiating into multiple lineages , on delivery to the heart after acute MI, cardiogenic (all cell types in the myocardium) differentiation was noted . Additionally, several studies have shown improvements in cardiac function after MI either by endogenous bone marrow  or by augmenting this endogenous MSC response via injection of Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and other stem cell-mobilizing factors . Finally, early human clinical trials demonstrated modest, yet significant, improvements in cardiac performance after MSC administration [7, 8].
Extensive published studies demonstrate significant increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) almost immediately after an acute MI. Elevated levels of ROS have deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system and are critical in the pathophysiology of heart failure. Potential sources of ROS in the myocardium include the NADPH oxidases of fibroblasts and infiltrating inflammatory cells, as well as the myocytes themselves . Ischemic injury further elevates ROS production in these cells, which may influence differentiation of endogenous or implanted stem cells at the infarct site. Although effects of ROS on cardiac cell death, remodeling, and function are well studied, stem and progenitor cells that could be used for potential regeneration have both adaptive and maladaptive responses to oxidative stress. For example, acute bursts of ROS to embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in culture facilitate differentiation toward the cardiomyocyte phenotype, whereas prolonged exposure to H2O2 inhibits differentiation . Although the effect of ROS on certain stem cell types is fairly established, the exact signaling pathways regulated by ROS, especially in the cardiogenic differentiation of stem cells, are under intensive investigation. Thus, pinpointing the exact signals modulated by ROS, leading to alterations in MSC differentiation, is of great therapeutic interest.
One of the major signaling pathways involved in stem cell differentiation is the Notch signaling pathway. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular communication pathway that regulates diverse cellular processes, ranging from cell-fate decision, differentiation, and proliferation to apoptosis. Activation of the Notch receptor by adjacent cell surface-bound ligands of the Jagged and Delta family leads to proteolytic cleavage and nuclear translocation of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and subsequent transcriptional regulation of target genes, leading to maintenance of cells in an uncommitted state or induction of cell-type-specific differentiation . Notch signaling promotes early cardiac development  and has also been identified to precede heart regeneration in zebrafish . Further, certain mutations in Notch ligands or receptors are associated with embryonic lethality in mice . Apart from regulating normal development and damage-induced repair, Notch signaling has also been found to promote cardiomyocyte survival . Notch activation has been shown to promote cardiac gene expression in circulating endothelial progenitor cells , bone-marrow derived MSCs , and cardiac progenitors , while attenuating cardiac differentiation of embryonic stem cells .
The effects of Notch signaling on different cell types are well studied, but its regulation by oxidative stress is unknown. We therefore sought to determine the role of oxidative stress on cardiogenic gene expression in MSCs and whether Notch signaling plays a role in directing differentiation of MSCs in the setting of elevated local H2O2 levels after MI. Our data suggest that H2O2 or glucose oxidase-mediated oxidative stress promotes cardiogenic differentiation in adult stem/progenitor cells through upregulation of Notch1 signaling, possibly involving Wnt11.
Materials and methods
Mesenchymal stem cell isolation
Mesenchymal stem cells were obtained from the femur and tibia of adult male Sprague–Dawley rats with Percoll density gradient centrifugation and adherence to tissue-culture flasks. MSCs were used from passages 2 to 4 cultured on Minimal Essential Media alpha (MEMα; Hyclone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), L-glutamine (Cellgro, Mediatech, USA), and 100 U penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA).
Trilineage differentiation of MSCs
To determine the trilineage differentiation capacity, the MSCs were cultured in adipogenic (SR811D250; Amsbio, Abingdon, UK), osteogenic (SR417D250; Amsbio), or chondrogenic (SC00B5-2; Vitro Biopharma, Golden, USA) media for 21 days with media replenishment every 3 days. The MSCs were also cultured for 1 week ± 100 μM H2O2. To demonstrate adipogenic differentiation, the cells were stained with 0.3% Oil Red O (O0625; Sigma, St. Louis, USA) in isopropanol for 30 minutes and rinsed with PBS. For osteogenic differentiation, the cells were stained with 1% alizarin red (500–4; RiccaChem, Arlington, USA) for 15 minutes. For chondrogenic differentiation, cells were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue O in PBS (198161-5G; Sigma). The stained cells were imaged under a phase-contrast microscope (Olympus, Pittsburgh, USA).
Cardiac progenitor cell isolation
Cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) were isolated from the hearts of adult male Sprague–Dawley rats by selection of cKit+ cells with anti-cKit antibody (H-300; Santa Cruz, Dallas, USA)-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Carlsbad, USA), as previously described .
Characterization of MSCs and CPCs
The surface expression of c-kit (H-300; Santa Cruz), CD45 (Invitrogen), CD34 (sc-7324; Santa Cruz), CD73 (551123; BD Pharmingen, San Jose, USA), CD90 (554898; BD Pharmingen, San Jose, USA), and CD105 (bs-0579R; Bioss, Denver, USA) in MSCs and expression of c-kit and the transcription factors nkx2-5 (sc-14033; Santa Cruz), and gata4 (sc-9053; SantaCruz) in CPCs was determined with flow analysis by using an FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA). The isotypes of each antibody served as the negative control.
Induction of oxidative stress in MSCs and CPCs
To induce acute oxidative stress, MSCs or CPCs were cultured in serum-free media with Insulin/Transferrin/Selenium (ITS) containing H2O2 (0 to 100 μM; Fisher Scientific, New Hampshire, USA) for 1 week, or glucose oxidase (0 to 5 mU/ml; Sigma) for 48 hours. Media was replenished every day with fresh media with or without H2O2. MSC and CPC growth media contain 5.5 mM and 10 mM glucose, respectively, and the addition of GOX results in continuous generation of H2O2.
Total RNA was isolated by using the QIA RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, USA) as per maunfacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized as described . Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on a StepOne Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, USA) by using specific primers for the cardiogenic and Notch1-related genes (see Additional file 1, Table S1). Gene-expression data were normalized to GAPDH in the H2O2-treated MSCs and to 18S in the GOX-treated MSCs. GAPDH is a gene involved in glucose metabolism and, as addition of glucose oxidase (GOX) alters the glucose levels in the media, 18S and not GAPDH was used as the housekeeping gene for studies involving GOX.
MSCs were treated with or without 5 mU/ml GOX for 48 hours. The protein expression of α-MHC (ab50967; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), Flt1 (ab32152; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and smooth muscle α-actin (SAB250093; Sigma) was determined with flow analysis by using an FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson). Primary antibodies were used at 1:300, and appropriate secondary antibodies were used at 1:500 with isotype controls.
Measurement of Notch intracellular domain
Total protein was isolated as described . Equal amounts of protein were loaded on 4% to 15% SDS-PAGE gradient gel (Bio-Rad, Berkeley, USA). After transfer, the nitrocellulose membrane was probed with anti-Notch intracellular domain (Cell Signaling, Beverly, USA) antibody. A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody was used (Bio-Rad), and chemiluminescent signals were obtained on a Kodak Imager Station 4000 MM Pro (Carestream Molecular Imaging, Rochester, USA). NICD protein levels were normalized to GAPDH (Santa Cruz).
Chemical inhibition of Notch signaling
MSCs were treated with a γ-secretase inhibitor IX DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl-L-alanyl)]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester; Calbiochem, Billerica, USA, 10 μM) every day for 1 week to inhibit Notch1 activation in MSCs ± H2O2. On day 7, RNA and protein were harvested for subsequent qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively.
siRNA-mediated knockdown of Notch1
To determine the optimal transfection reagent, MSCs were transfected with 100 nM mock siRNA labeled with Cy3 for 48 hours by using oligofectamine (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA), HiPerfect (Qiagen), or Lipofectamine RNAimax (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The transfection efficiency was determined with flow analysis (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson) and fluorescent microscopy (Nikon). To knockdown Notch1 expression in MSCs, the cells were transfected with 25 nM either QIAgen Allstar Negative control siRNA (siNC) or QIA siNotch1 (S101920730) with oligofectamine (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 hours, RNA and protein were harvested for subsequent qRT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively.
Gene-expression analysis with PCR array
Based on the manufacturer’s instructions, the Qiagen Rat Notch PCR Array PARN-059A was used to analyze gene expression in MSCs treated with or without 5 mU/ml GOX.
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. To determine significance, either an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done followed by the appropriate post hoc test, or a Student t test was performed by using GraphPad Prism5. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells
H2O2 or glucose oxidase treatment increases early endothelial gene expression in MSCs
H2O2 or glucose oxidase treatment increases early cardiac gene expression in MSCs
H2O2 or glucose oxidase treatment negatively modulates smooth muscle and fibroblast gene expression in MSCs
H2O2 or glucose oxidase treatment induces Notch1 signaling
mRNA analysis of Notch1-related genes regulated by GOX
H2O2 and glucose oxidase regulate cardiogenic gene expression in MSCs through Notch1
To determine whether GOX mediated changes in cardiogenic gene expression through Notch1 signaling, MSCs were treated with 5 mU/ml GOX in the presence of a negative control siRNA (siNC) or siNotch1 for 48 hours. MSCs were transfected with siRNA by using oligofectamine, as it resulted in the highest transfection efficiency when compared with other commercially available reagents (Additional file 1, Figure S2A). As shown in Additional file 1, Figure S2B, siNotch1 significantly decreased mRNA expression of Notch1 (P < 0.05) when compared with untreated or siNC-treated MSCs. Further, siNotch1 decreased the GOX-induced increase in Notch1 expression comparable to untreated cells, whereas the siNC had no effect (Additional file 1, Figure S3A and B). As shown in Figure 7E and F, addition of siNotch1 showed a trend toward decreasing GOX-induced increase in expression of cardiac αMHC and Flt1 with no significant effect of siNC. The expression of the smooth muscle markers (sm α-actin and sm22α) was unaltered by addition of GOX in presence or absence of siNC or siNotch1 (Figure 7G, H).
H2O2 and glucose oxidase regulate cardiogenic protein expression
Oxidative stress promotes cardiogenic gene expression in cardiac progenitor cells
Previous studies showed that transplantation of MSCs in the heart after MI leads to small but significant functional improvements . Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which MSCs promote cardiac function, especially in the oxidative microenvironment after MI, will greatly aid in improving efficacy of stem cell-based therapies. After myocardial infarction, elevated levels of ROS have been found at the infarct site , suggesting that ROS such as H2O2 might influence the differentiation and function of implanted MSCs. As substantial amounts of ROS have been found in the area at risk after MI , and as ROS have been identified to play a critical role in the differentiation of other stem cell types [24, 25], we chose to study the effect of H2O2 on MSC differentiation in vitro.
Here we showed that MSCs that were subjected to pulses of pathophysiologic levels of H2O2 for 1 week or continuous H2O2 produced by oxidation of glucose in the extracellular media by GOX for 48 hours increased the expression of early cardiac and endothelial genes with decreased expression of early smooth muscle genes.
Although only a twofold increase in cardiac markers is observed with H2O2 treatment, addition of GOX results in a more robust increase of 30-fold for αMHC and 75-fold for nkx2-5, which are comparable to neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, with 40-fold and 100-fold higher expression of αMHC and nkx2-5, respectively, when compared with untreated MSCs. These results were in agreement with those reported for human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) . Similar results were obtained when adult heart-resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) were treated with GOX. These data demonstrate redox-sensitive alteration in cardiogenic gene expression in MSCs and CPCs.
Our results also demonstrate that only high levels of exogenous H2O2 (100 μM) and high concentrations of GOX (5 mU/ml) were able to regulate expression of Notch1 and cardiogenic genes. We believe this very narrow threshold effect may be due to a combination of factors, such as presence of basal H2O2 and constitutive expression of antioxidant enzymes by cells. Unpublished data from our laboratory demonstrate basal H2O2 levels of 1 μM in cultured stem cells, as measured with electron paramagnetic spin resonance. Recent reports demonstrate that many stem cells, including MSCs, contain higher levels of antioxidants [26, 27]. We measured H2O2 levels in stem cells after addition of 100 μM H2O2 and found that the concentration reduced to 12 μM, within an hour, indicating rapid scavenging of exogenous oxidants.
Finally, recent data from human MSCs determined higher levels of catalase and glutathione peroxidase, with no changes in superoxide dismutase compared with other stem cells and fully differentiated cells . In that study, a threshold response with human MSCs demonstrated almost 80% survival at 4 mM H2O2, decreasing to <10% at 8 mM. Our studies indicate robust survival at 100 μM H2O2 and 5 mU/ml GOX with cellular responses, but showed higher concentrations to be potentially cytotoxic. Taken together, these data demonstrate that many cells, especially stem and progenitor, have threshold responses with small windows of dose-responses.
Next, we investigated whether H2O2 regulates any signaling pathway involved in stem cell differentiation. One of the signaling pathways that greatly influence stem cell differentiation is the Notch signaling pathway . Therefore, we investigated whether interplay existed between H2O2 and Notch1 signaling pathways. Interestingly, the mRNA level of Notch1 as well as proteolytic cleavage of the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) was upregulated by treatment with 100 μM either H2O2 or GOX, suggesting that high levels of H2O2 affect expression of both the mRNA and protein activity of Notch1. Although only a 1.5-fold increase in mRNA and twofold increase in NICD protein is observed, reports suggest that very small changes in Notch1 activation are sufficient to induce Notch1 signaling . Furthermore, this increase in Notch1 also significantly increased mRNA expression of downstream targets of Notch1. As MSCs were pulsed with H2O2 for 1 week, discontinuous oxidative stress resulted in small fold changes in cardiac gene expression. Although these changes may not represent true differentiation, they suggest that H2O2 levels influence cardiac gene expression in MSCs.
Although upregulation of cardiac and endothelial genes by Notch1 signaling may appear to be counterintuitive, given the role of Notch signaling in suppressing cardiomyogenesis in ESCs , upregulation of nkx2-5 and vWF is consistent with reports indicating involvement of Notch1 signaling in regulating these genes in cardiac progenitor cells and bone marrow stromal cells, respectively [18, 29]. Our observation that treatment with 100 μM H2O2 or 5 mU/ml GOX decreased expression of the Notch1 ligand Jagged1 in MSCs is consistent with previous reports of an inverse relation between expression levels of Notch1 and Jagged 1 in other cell types .
As we observed changes in cardiogenic gene expression at the mRNA level, we sought to determine whether these changes translated correspondingly at the protein level. Flow analysis of GOX-treated MSCs indicated that a small number of MSCs have high expression of αMHC, along with increased Flt1 expression and decreased sm α-actin expression. These results suggest that GOX treatment increases the frequency αMHC- and Flt1-positive cells while decreasing sm α-actin-positive cells.
The mechanism of upregulation of Notch1 activation by H2O2 may be due to activation of enzymes involved in Notch1 cleavage and processing. It is possible that H2O2 may increase Notch1 activation via γ-secretase activation, as H2O2-mediated increase in γ-secretase activation has been demonstrated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease . Pharmacologic inhibition of γ-secretase activity by using DAPT inhibits Notch1 activation in different stem cells [29, 32]. Therefore, to determine whether H2O2 regulates cardiogenic gene expression in MSCs through Notch1 signaling, we blocked Notch1 activation daily by using DAPT and analyzed expression of the different cardiogenic markers in the presence and absence of 100 μM H2O2. Among the markers analyzed, the increase in expression of the high-affinity VEGF receptor Flt1 and the cardiac marker αMHC observed with 100 μM H2O2 was abrogated by co-treatment with DAPT, indicating that H2O2 regulates Flt1 and αMHC expression through Notch1 signaling. We attempted knockdown of Notch1 by using siRNA; however, this was not successful, as siRNAs that significantly reduced Notch1 gene expression greatly reduced cell survival over the 1-week period of treatment.
To determine whether glucose oxidase (GOX) mediated acute changes in cardiogenic gene expression through Notch1 signaling, MSCs were transfected with siNotch1 along with GOX for 48 hours. Treatment with siNotch1 showed a strong trend toward decreasing the GOX-mediated increase in αMHC and Flt1, whereas no effect was observed on smooth muscle gene expression by addition of GOX ± siNotch1. As ADAM17 is involved in Notch1 processing, MSCs were pretreated with an ADAM17 inhibitor. No effect was observed on H2O2-induced gene expression, nor was the expression or activity of ADAM17 altered by H2O2 treatment, suggesting the importance of the γ-secretase component of this pathway (Additional file 1, Figure S4). Further, treatment with GOX increased expression of enzymes involved in processing of Notch1 and Jagged1, such as Mfng, Lfng, and Neurl, indicating that H2O2 influences both notch1 cleavage and processing enzymes.
Expression of smooth muscle markers decreased significantly on treatment with 100 μM H2O2. Inhibition of Notch1 also decreased basal expression of smooth muscle markers, in keeping with prior findings . Interestingly, co-treatment of MSCs with H2O2 and DAPT resulted in a further decrease in smooth muscle markers. This indicates that H2O2 decreases smooth muscle gene expression through a parallel pathway, and that activation of Notch serves as a compensatory mechanism to stabilize smooth muscle gene expression.
Finally, expression of vimentin was also decreased by both H2O2 and GOX treatment. Although vimentin is expressed in many cell types, it is most prevalent in fibroblasts and is thought to be a partial marker of fibroblastic lineage ; lower expression could lead to decreased fibrosis.
To understand the mechanism by which oxidative stress mediated by GOX resulted in robust increases in cardiogenic gene expression, the expression of Notch1-related genes in GOX-treated MSCs was analyzed with a PCR array. Interestingly, Wnt11 expression was increased in GOX-treated MSCs. Wnt11 signaling has been shown to promote cardiomyogenic differentiation of human endothelial progenitor cells and mouse marrow mononuclear cells [35, 36]. Moreover, Wnt signaling has been identified as a downstream target of Notch1 that regulates expression of cardiac transcription factors during mouse cardiogenesis and is essential for cardiac development [37, 38]. MSCs overexpressing Wnt11 have been shown to be cardioprotective after oxidative stress in rats through increased cardiac gene expression and release of paracrine factors [39, 40].
Of note, MSCs used in this study were a heterogenous mix of cells present in the adult rat bone marrow. It is unclear whether one particular lineage in the heterogenous mix is most responsible for these changes or whether Notch1 is activated in all these cell types. Although published literature suggests that all these cells express Notch [18, 41], the optimal cell type must be determined.
α-myosin heavy chain
N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl-L-alanyl)]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester
Fms-related tyrosine kinase 1
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Notch1 intracellular domain
smooth muscle 22 alpha.
This work was supported by grant HL094527 to M.E.D. from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a Merck/United Negro College Fund Postdoctoral Fellowship to K.D.P., and an American Heart Association predoctoral fellowship 11PRE7840078 to A.V.B.
- Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Greenlund KJ, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Ho PM, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McDermott MM, Meigs JB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Rosamond WD, Sorlie PD, Stafford RS, Turan TN, Turner MB, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J: Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011, 123: e18-e209. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bui QT, Gertz ZM, Wilensky RL:Intracoronary delivery of bone-marrow-derived stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010, 1: 29-10.1186/scrt29.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR:Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999, 284: 143-147. 10.1126/science.284.5411.143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rota M, Kajstura J, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Vitale S, Esposito G, Iaffaldano G, Padin-Iruegas ME, Gonzalez A, Rizzi R, Small N, Muraski J, Alvarez R, Chen X, Urbanek K, Bolli R, Houser SR, Leri A, Sussman MA, Anversa P:Bone marrow cells adopt the cardiomyogenic fate in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 17783-17788. 10.1073/pnas.0706406104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, Pickel J, McKay R, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Anversa P:Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001, 410: 701-705. 10.1038/35070587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deng Z, Yang C, Deng H, Yang A, Geng T, Chen X, Ma A, Liu Z:Effects of GM-CSF on the stem cells mobilization and plasma C-reactive protein levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2006, 113: 92-96. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.06.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Lotz J, Ringes-Lichtenberg S, Lippolt P, Breidenbach C, Fichtner S, Korte T, Hornig B, Messinger D, Arseniev L, Hertenstein B, Ganser A, Drexler H:Intracoronary autologous bone-marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST randomised controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2004, 364: 141-148. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16626-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams AR, Trachtenberg B, Velazquez DL, McNiece I, Altman P, Rouy D, Mendizabal AM, Pattany PM, Lopera GA, Fishman J, Zambrano JP, Heldman AW, Hare JM:Intramyocardial stem cell injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: functional recovery and reverse remodeling. Circ Res. 2011, 108: 792-796. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.242610.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hori M, Nishida K:Oxidative stress and left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2009, 81: 457-464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sauer H, Rahimi G, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M:Effects of electrical fields on cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 1999, 75: 710-723. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19991215)75:4<710::AID-JCB16>3.0.CO;2-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ:Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 1999, 284: 770-776. 10.1126/science.284.5415.770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niessen K, Karsan A:Notch signaling in cardiac development. Circ Res. 2008, 102: 1169-1181. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.174318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raya A, Koth CM, Buscher D, Kawakami Y, Itoh T, Raya RM, Sternik G, Tsai HJ, Rodriguez-Esteban C, Izpisua-Belmonte JC:Activation of Notch signaling pathway precedes heart regeneration in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 11889-11895. 10.1073/pnas.1834204100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xue Y, Gao X, Lindsell CE, Norton CR, Chang B, Hicks C, Gendron-Maguire M, Rand EB, Weinmaster G, Gridley T:Embryonic lethality and vascular defects in mice lacking the Notch ligand Jagged1. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8: 723-730. 10.1093/hmg/8.5.723.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gude NA, Emmanuel G, Wu W, Cottage CT, Fischer K, Quijada P, Muraski JA, Alvarez R, Rubio M, Schaefer E, Sussman MA:Activation of Notch-mediated protective signaling in the myocardium. Circ Res. 2008, 102: 1025-1035. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.164749.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koyanagi M, Bushoven P, Iwasaki M, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S:Notch signaling contributes to the expression of cardiac markers in human circulating progenitor cells. Circ Res. 2007, 101: 1139-1145. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.151381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Yu B, Zhang Y, Pan Z, Xu W:Jagged1 protein enhances the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 341: 320-325. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boni A, Urbanek K, Nascimbene A, Hosoda T, Zheng H, Delucchi F, Amano K, Gonzalez A, Vitale S, Ojaimi C, Rizzi R, Bolli R, Yutzey KE, Rota M, Kajstura J, Anversa P, Leri A:Notch1 regulates the fate of cardiac progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105: 15529-15534. 10.1073/pnas.0808357105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nemir M, Croquelois A, Pedrazzini T, Radtke F:Induction of cardiogenesis in embryonic stem cells via downregulation of Notch1 signaling. Circ Res. 2006, 98: 1471-1478. 10.1161/01.RES.0000226497.52052.2a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, Kasahara H, Rota M, Musso E, Urbanek K, Leri A, Kajstura J, Nadal-Ginard B, Anversa P:Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003, 114: 763-776. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00687-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- French KM, Boopathy AV, Dequach JA, Chingozha L, Lu H, Christman KL, Davis ME:A naturally derived cardiac extracellular matrix enhances cardiac progenitor cell behavior in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2012,Google Scholar
- Bray SJ:Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006, 7: 678-689. 10.1038/nrm2009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song H, Cha MJ, Song BW, Kim IK, Chang W, Lim S, Choi EJ, Ham O, Lee SY, Chung N, Jang Y, Hwang KC:Reactive oxygen species inhibit adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells implanted into ischemic myocardium via interference of focal adhesion complex. Stem Cells. 2010, 28: 555-563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Le Belle JE, Orozco NM, Paucar AA, Saxe JP, Mottahedeh J, Pyle AD, Wu H, Kornblum HI:Proliferative neural stem cells have high endogenous ROS levels that regulate self-renewal and neurogenesis in a PI3K/Akt-dependant manner. Cell Stem Cell. 2011, 8: 59-71. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sauer H, Rahimi G, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M:Role of reactive oxygen species and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in cardiomyocyte differentiation of embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett. 2000, 476: 218-223. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01747-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dernbach E, Urbich C, Brandes RP, Hofmann WK, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S:Antioxidative stress-associated genes in circulating progenitor cells: evidence for enhanced resistance against oxidative stress. Blood. 2004, 104: 3591-3597. 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valle-Prieto A, Conget PA:Human mesenchymal stem cells efficiently manage oxidative stress. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19: 1885-1893. 10.1089/scd.2010.0093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiba S:Notch signaling in stem cell systems. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 2437-2447. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0661.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu J, Liu X, Chen J, Zacharek A, Cui X, Savant-Bhonsale S, Liu Z, Chopp M:Simvastatin enhances bone marrow stromal cell differentiation into endothelial cells via notch signaling pathway. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009, 296: C535-543.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohler C, Bell AW, Bowen WC, Monga SP, Fleig W, Michalopoulos GK:Expression of Notch-1 and its ligand Jagged-1 in rat liver during liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2004, 39: 1056-1065. 10.1002/hep.20156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen C, Chen Y, Liu H, Zhang K, Zhang T, Lin A, Jing N:Hydrogen peroxide promotes Abeta production through JNK-dependent activation of gamma-secretase. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 17721-17730. 10.1074/jbc.M800013200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Borghese L, Dolezalova D, Opitz T, Haupt S, Leinhaas A, Steinfarz B, Koch P, Edenhofer F, Hampl A, Brustle O:Inhibition of notch signaling in human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells delays G1/S phase transition and accelerates neuronal differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells. 2010, 28: 955-964. 10.1002/stem.408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang Y, Urs S, Liaw L:Hairy-related transcription factors inhibit Notch-induced smooth muscle alpha-actin expression by interfering with Notch intracellular domain/CBF-1 complex interaction with the CBF-1-binding site. Circ Res. 2008, 102: 661-668. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.165134.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Camelliti P, Borg TK, Kohl P:Structural and functional characterisation of cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 2005, 65: 40-51. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.08.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koyanagi M, Haendeler J, Badorff C, Brandes RP, Hoffmann J, Pandur P, Zeiher AM, Kuhl M, Dimmeler S:Non-canonical Wnt signaling enhances differentiation of human circulating progenitor cells to cardiomyogenic cells. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 16838-16842. 10.1074/jbc.M500323200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flaherty MP, Abdel-Latif A, Li Q, Hunt G, Ranjan S, Ou Q, Tang XL, Johnson RK, Bolli R, Dawn B:Noncanonical Wnt11 signaling is sufficient to induce cardiomyogenic differentiation in unfractionated bone marrow mononuclear cells. Circulation. 2008, 117: 2241-2252. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.741066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klaus A, Muller M, Schulz H, Saga Y, Martin JF, Birchmeier W:Wnt/beta-catenin and Bmp signals control distinct sets of transcription factors in cardiac progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109: 10921-10926. 10.1073/pnas.1121236109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen ED, Miller MF, Wang Z, Moon RT, Morrisey EE:Wnt5a and Wnt11 are essential for second heart field progenitor development. Development. 2012, 139: 1931-1940. 10.1242/dev.069377.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuo S, Jones WK, Li H, He Z, Pasha Z, Yang Y, Wang Y, Fan GC, Ashraf M, Xu M:Paracrine effect of Wnt11-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells on ischemic injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21: 598-608. 10.1089/scd.2011.0071.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He Z, Li H, Zuo S, Pasha Z, Wang Y, Yang Y, Jiang W, Ashraf M, Xu M:Transduction of Wnt11 promotes mesenchymal stem cell transdifferentiation into cardiac phenotypes. Stem Cells Dev. 2011, 20: 1771-1778. 10.1089/scd.2010.0380.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duncan AW, Rattis FM, DiMascio LN, Congdon KL, Pazianos G, Zhao C, Yoon K, Cook JM, Willert K, Gaiano N, Reya T:Integration of Notch and Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nat Immunol. 2005, 6: 314-322. 10.1038/ni1164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.