Cyclosporine-assisted adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy to mitigate acute kidney ischemia–reperfusion injury
- Yen-Ta Chen†1,
- Chih-Chau Yang†2,
- Yen-Yi Zhen3,
- Christopher Glenn Wallace4,
- Jenq-Lin Yang5,
- Cheuk-Kwan Sun6,
- Tzu-Hsien Tsai3,
- Jiunn-Jye Sheu7,
- Sarah Chua3,
- Chia-Lo Chang8,
- Chung-Lung Cho9,
- Steve Leu5Email author and
- Hon-Kan Yip3, 5Email author
© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 February 2013
Accepted: 20 May 2013
Published: 31 May 2013
This study tested the hypothesis that cyclosporine (CsA)-supported syngeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) therapy offered superior attenuation of acute ischemia–reperfusion (IR) kidney injury to either therapy alone.
Adult Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 40) were equally divided into group 1 (sham controls), group 2 (IR injury), group 3 (IR + CsA (20 mg/kg at 1 and 24 hours after procedure)), group 4 (syngeneic ADMSC (1.2×106) at 1, 6 and 24 hours after procedure), and group 5 (IR + CsA-ADMSC).
By 72 hours after the IR procedure, the creatinine level and the ratio of urine protein to creatinine were highest in group 2 and lowest in group 1, and significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 than in group 5 (all P <0.05 for inter-group comparisons), but showed no differences between groups 3 and 4 (P >0.05). The inflammatory biomarkers at mRNA (matrix metalloproteinase-9, RANTES, TNF-α), protein (TNF-α, NF-κB, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, platelet-derived growth factor), and cellular (CD68+) levels of IR kidney showed a similar pattern compared with that of creatinine in all groups (all P <0.05 for inter-group comparisons). The protein expressions of oxidative stress (oxidized protein), reactive oxygen species (NADPH oxidases NOX-1, NOX-2), apoptosis (Bcl-2–associated X protein, caspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase) and DNA damage (phosphorylated H2A histone family member X-positive, proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells) markers exhibited a pattern similar to that of inflammatory mediators amongst all groups (all P <0.05 for inter-group comparisons). Expressions of antioxidant biomarkers at cellular (glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)) and protein (NADPH dehydrogenase (quinone)-1, HO-1, endothelial nitric oxide synthase) levels, and endothelial progenitor cell markers (C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4-positive, stromal cell-derived factor-1α-positive) were lowest in groups 1 and 2, higher in groups 3 and 4, and highest in group 5 (all P <0.05 for inter-group comparisons).
Combination therapy using CsA plus ADMSCs offers improved protection against acute IR kidney injury.
The kidney and its vital functions are vulnerable to damage by a variety of disease processes given its frequent exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and toxic organic substances and its sensitivity to hemodynamic instability such as following hypotensive shock [1–6]. Of these processes [1–4, 7], acute kidney injury caused by ischemic and/or ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury [2, 4, 5] remains one of the most important problems to be solved for daily clinical practice [8–10]. Acute kidney injury lacks effective management and yet is responsible for high levels of inpatient morbidity and mortality [1–3, 8–10]. An effective and safe treatment for acute kidney injury is therefore important and urgent for clinicians and scientists alike.
The underlying mechanism of acute organ IR injury mainly involves an ROS burst during reperfusion of ischemic tissues that can trigger opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pore, mitochondrial depolarization, decreased ATP synthesis and increased ROS production [11–14]. ROS generation stimulates pro-apoptotic mediators, inflammatory cytokines, further oxidative stress and exacerbation of inflammation [11–14]. The MPT pore comprises cyclophilin D, voltage-dependent anion channels and adenine nucleotide translocase [15–17]. Cyclosporine A (CsA), a cyclophilin D inhibitor, is well recognized to reduce ROS generation by inhibiting cyclophilin D action in the MPT pore [18–21]. Indeed, CsA administration limited myocardial infarct size  and protected organs against acute IR injury [21, 23].
Moreover, numerous experimental studies [24, 25] and clinical observational studies [26, 27] have supported mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy being a safe and promising modality for reversing ischemia-related organ dysfunction [24–27] and improving clinical outcome [26, 27] mainly through angiogenic and paracrine effects. Furthermore, recent data have revealed that MSCs have intrinsic anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties [28, 29]. Importantly, MSC therapy reduced acute organ IR injury [5, 6], including acute kidney IR injury . Interestingly, an in vitro study has previously shown that human adipose tissue-derived MSCs facilitate the immunosuppressive effect of CsA on T lymphocytes through Jagged-1/Notch-related inhibition of NF-κB signaling . However, further preclinical experimental study should be investigated to further confirm the safety the efficacy of this combination therapy prior to applying this strategic management for patients with acute kidney IR injury.
Given the above properties of CsA and MSCs, this study tested the hypothesis that CsA-supported adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) therapy might provide improved attenuation of acute kidney IR injury in a rat model.
All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital – Kaohsiung Medical Center (Affidavit of Approval of Animal Use Protocol No. 2008121108) and were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85–23, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, revised 1996).
Animal groups and isolation of adipose tissue for culture of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Pathogen-free, adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 40) weighing 320 to350 g (Charles River Technology, BioLASCO Taiwan Co. Ltd, Taiwan) were randomized and equally divided into: group 1, sham controls (n = 8); group 2, acute kidney IR injury with DMEM medium (500 μl) without fetal bovine serum, at 1, 6 and 24 hours after the IR procedure (n = 8); group 3, acute kidney IR injury + CsA (20.0 mg/kg intravenously at 1 and 24 hours after the IR procedure (n = 8); group 4, acute kidney IR injury + syngeneic ADMSC (1.2 × 106) at 1, 6, and 24 hours after the IR procedure (n = 8); and group 5, acute kidney IR injury + CsA + autologous ADMSC (1.2 × 106) at 1, 6, and 24 hours after the IR procedure (n = 8). CsA and syngeneic ADMSC dosages were chosen according to our previous studies with minor modifications [5, 21, 23]. Additionally, the choice of time points for ADMSC administration at 1, 6, and 24 hours after the IR procedure was based on our recent study which demonstrated that ADMSC administration at these time points after acute rat kidney IR injury through penile venous transfusion markedly attenuated acute IR-induced kidney injury [5, 21, 23]. Besides, these time points were initially chosen in an attempt to mimic the clinical scheduling of antibiotics (that is, cell therapy is just like the drug to be used in our daily clinical practice) for patients with sepsis syndrome.
Isolation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from Sprague–Dawley rats
Rats in groups 4 and 5 were anesthetized with inhalational 2% isoflurane 14 days before induction of acute kidney IR injury for harvest of peri-epididymal adipose tissue, as we reported previously [5, 6]. In detail, the adipose tissue surrounding the epididymis was carefully dissected and excised. Then 200 to 300 μl sterile saline was added to every 0.5 g tissue to prevent dehydration. The tissue was cut into <1 mm3 size pieces using sharp, sterile surgical scissors. Sterile saline (37°C) was added to the homogenized adipose tissue in a ratio of 3:1 (saline:adipose tissue), followed by the addition of stock collagenase solution to a final concentration of 0.5 units/ml. The tubes with the contents were placed and secured on a Thermaline shaker and incubated with constant agitation for 60 ± 15 minutes at 37°C. After 40 minutes of incubation, the content was triturated with a 25 ml pipette for 2 to 3 minutes. The cells obtained were placed back on the rocker for incubation. The contents of the flask were transferred to 50 ml tubes after digestion, followed by centrifugation at 600×g for 5 minutes at room temperature. The fat layer and saline supernatant from the tube were poured out gently in one smooth motion or were removed using vacuum suction. The cell pellet thus obtained was resuspended in 40 ml saline and then centrifuged again at 600×g for 5 minutes at room temperature. After being resuspended again in 5 ml saline, the cell suspension was filtered through a 100 μm filter into a 50 ml conical tube to which 2 ml saline was added to rinse the remaining cells through the filter. The flow-through was pipetted to a 40 μm filter into a new 50 ml conical tube. The tubes were centrifuged for a third time at 600×g for 5 minutes at room temperature. The cells were resuspended in saline.
ADMSC labeling and acute kidney ischemia–reperfusion injury protocol
On day 14, CM-Dil (Vybrant™ Dil cell-labeling solution, 50 μg/ml; Molecular Probes, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added to the culture medium 30 minutes before the acute kidney IR procedure for ADMSC labeling as reported previously . After ADMSC labeling, all animals were anesthetized by inhalational 2.0% isoflurane, and placed supine on a warming pad at 37°C for midline laparotomies; left nephrectomies were performed in groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 but sham-operated rats (group 1) received laparotomy alone. Acute right kidney IR injury was then conducted in all animals except sham controls by clamping the right renal pedicle for 1 hour using nontraumatic vascular clips before reperfusion for 72 hours.
Group 2 animals received an intravenous injection of 500 μl DMEM medium only 1 hour after the ischemia procedure, followed by intravenous injections of 500 μl DMEM medium at 6 and 24 hours after the IR procedure through the penile vein. Group 4 and 5 animals underwent the same protocol, except an equal volume of DMEM medium (500 ml) with syngeneic ADMSCs (1.2 × 106) was administered at each time point instead of pure culture medium. All animals were sacrificed 72 hours after the IR procedure.
Measurement of renal function before and after ischemia–reperfusion procedure
Blood samples that were collected before and after (at 24 and 72 hours) the IR procedure before their sacrifice were then stored at −80°C until analyses of serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), urine protein and urine creatinine were performed at the end of the experiment for all animals. The concentrations of these biomarkers were assessed in duplicate with a commercially available assay kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA). Intra-individual variability in creatinine and BUN level were assessed in each group. The mean intra-assay coefficients of variance for creatinine and BUN were all <4.0%, respectively.
Collection of 24-hour urine before and after (on days 1 and 3) ischemia–reperfusion procedure
Twenty-four-hour urine was collected in all animals prior to the IR procedure and at 24 and 72 hours after the IR procedure before their sacrifice to determine the daily urine volume and to measure the ratio of urine protein to urine creatinine excretion.
Histopathology scoring at 72 hours after the ischemia–reperfusion procedure
Histopathology scoring was determined in blinded fashion as reported previously [5, 31]. Briefly, the right kidney specimens from all animals were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm and stained (H & E) for light microscopy. The score reflected the grading of tubular necrosis, loss of brush border, cast formation and tubular dilatation in 10 randomly chosen, nonoverlapping fields (200×) as follows: 0, none; 1, ≤10%; 2, 11 to 25%; 3, 26 to 45%; 4, 46 to 75%; and 5, ≥76%.
Immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical studies
The immunofluorescent (IF) and immunohistochemical (IHC) methodologies used in this study have recently been described in detail . Briefly, CM-Dil-positive ADMSCs, which were engrafted in the right renal parenchyma, were determined using the IF staining methodology that we also used for the examination of heme oxygenase (HO)-1-positive cells and CD68+ cells (an indicator of macrophage) using respective primary antibodies. Moreover, our IHC labeling technique was adopted to identify glutathione peroxidase (GPx)-positive, glutathione reductase (GR)-positive and proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells using respective primary antibodies based on our recent study . Irrelevant antibodies were used as controls in the current study. Additionally, an IHC-based scoring system was conducted in blinded fashion for semiquantitative analyses of GR and GPx as a percentage of positive cells. Scoring of positively-stained cells for GR and GPx was as follows: 0, no stain; 1, <15%; 2, 15 to 25%; 3, 25 to 50%; 4, 50 to 75%; 5, >75 to 100% per high-power field; 200×).
Western blot analysis of right kidney specimens
Our methods were previously detailed in our recent reports [5–7, 21]. mAbs against intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase (NQO)-1 (1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), HO-1 (1:250; Abcam), and polyclonal antibodies against TNFα (1:1,000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), NF-κB (1:250; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), platelet-derived growth factor (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), NADPH oxidase (NOX)-1 (1:1,500; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), NOX-2 (1:500; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), Bax (1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), caspase 3 (1:1,000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) (1:1,000; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), Bcl-2 (1:250; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), cytosolic cytochrome C (1:2,000; BD, San Jose, CA, USA), mitochondrial cytochrome C (1:2,000; BD) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) were used. Signals were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse, goat anti-rat, or goat anti-rabbit IgG.
The Oxyblot Oxidized Protein Detection Kit was purchased from Chemicon (S7150, Billerica, MA, USA). The procedure was the same as we reported previously [5, 6, 21]. A standard control was loaded on each gel.
Real-time quantitative PCR analysis
The mRNA expressions of caspase 3, Bcl-2, matrix metalloproteinase-9, TNFα, NF-κB, RANTES, NOX-1, NOX-2, HO-1, NQO-1, IL-10, prostaglandin E2 and eNOS in each of the five groups of animals were analyzed with quantitative real-time PCR and compared. Technical details were according to our previous reports [5–7, 21].
Superoxide dismutase assay
After weighing, the right kidney was sliced, homogenized in lysis buffer (100 μM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4 containing 0.5% Triton, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) with the Dounce homogenizer and then centrifuged at 14,000×g for 5 minutes to remove tissue debris. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration determined with the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The final total protein concentration was adjusted to 20 mg/ml. To measure superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, 20 μl (containing 400 μg protein) was applied for enzymatic reaction with a commercial SOD assay kit (#K335-100; BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA). Sample preparation and calculation of SOD activity were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS statistical software for Windows version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to conduct analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni multiple-comparison post-hoc test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Time courses of circulating levels of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, and the ratio of urine protein to creatinine after acute kidney IR procedure
Time courses for circulating levels of creatinine and BUN, and the urine protein:creatinine ratio
At 0 hours
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)
0.21 ± 0.05
0.22 ± 0.03
0.19 ± 0.03
0.23 ± 0.04
0.19 ± 0.05
Serum BUN (mg/dl)
14.8 ± 2.1
16.3 ± 3.3
13.5 ± 1.1
17.1 ± 1.7
16.4 ± 2.2
Ratio of urine protein to creatinine
1.10 ± 0.17
1.14 ± 0.53
1.14 ± 0.32
1.35 ± 0.90
1.18 ± 0.34
At 24 hours
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)
0.27 ± 0.08*
3.28 ± 1.29†
1.72 ± 1.93‡
1.55 ± 1.61‡
1.6 ± 0.72‡
Serum BUN (mg/dl)
16.6 ± 3.3*
86.7 ± 15.9†
67.8 ± 37.4‡
68.0 ± 35.9‡
68.0 ± 35.9‡
Ratio of urine protein to creatinine
1.28 ± 0.49*
6.75 ± 2.92†
4.01 ± 0.80‡
3.27 ± 0.33§
2.73 ± 0.60¶
At 72 hours
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)
0.44 ± 0.06*
3.58 ± 3.16†
1.21 ± 0.83‡
1.27 ± 0.83‡
0.82 ± 0.32§
Serum BUN (mg/dl)
23.3 ± 2.2*
109 ± 89.7†
63.5 ± 37.4‡
49.9 ± 29.5§
47.7 ± 18.3§
Ration of urine protein to creatinine
1.14 ± 0.60*
3.70 ± 2.82†
2.08 ± 2.06‡
1.52 ± 0.34§
1.19 ± 0.23¶
The ratio of urine protein to urine creatinine was similar in the five groups prior to the IR procedure. However, at 24 and 72 hours after IR, this parameter was highest in group 2 and lowest in group 1, significantly higher in group 3 than in groups 4 and 5, and significantly higher in group 4 than group 5 (Table 1).
Changes in mRNA expressions of apoptotic, inflammatory, oxidative, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory mediators in renal parenchyma
mRNA expression of apoptotic, inflammatory, oxidative, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory mediators in renal parenchyma after injury
1.24 ± 0.15†
0.91 ± 0.09‡
0.88 ± 0.07‡
0.6 ± 0.06§
0.60 ± 0.06†
0.73 ± 0.06‡
0.77 ± 0.06‡
0.94 ± 0.09§
1.21 ± 0.09†
0.88 ± 0.07‡
0.84 ± 0.04‡
0.56 ± 0.07§
1.32 ± 0.1†
0.94 ± 0.08‡
0.92 ± 0.04‡
1.30 ± 0.04†
1.03 ± 0.04‡
1.08 ± 0.06‡
0.84 ± 0.07§
1.30 ± 0.09†
1.07 ± 0.05‡
1.03 ± 0.04‡
0.89 ± 0.05§
1.43 ± 0.10†
1.66 ± 0.09‡
1.92 ± 0.11§
2.32 ± 0.11¶
1.1 ± 0.07†
1.22 ± 0.09‡
1.32 ± 0.04§
1.44 ± 0.10¶
1.66 ± 0.07†
1.60 ± 0.11‡
2.09 ± 0.06§
2.75 ± 0.11¶
0.82 ± 0.10†
1.05 ± 0.07‡
1.17 ± 0.05§
1.29 ± 0.07¶
0.62 ± 0.04†
0.75 ± 0.05‡
0.89 ± 0.05§
1.11 ± 0.04*
From tissues harvested at 72 hours post IR injury, the mRNA expression of TNFα, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and RANTES, three indicators of inflammation, were highest in group 2 and lowest in group 1, significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 than in group 5, but not significantly different between groups 3 and 4; this pattern was identical for the mRNA expressions of NOX-1 and NOX-2, two oxidative stress biomarkers. Conversely, the patterns of mRNA expressions of HO-1 and NQO 1, two antioxidant/antioxidative stress biomarkers, were opposite to those of NOX-1 and NOX-2 in the five groups (Table 2).
From tissues harvested at 72 hours post IR injury, the mRNA expression of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory biomarker, was lowest in group 1 and highest in group 5, significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 than in group 2, and significantly higher in group 4 than in group 3. Additionally, the mRNA expression of prostaglandin E2, an anti-inflammatory mediator, was lowest in group 2 and highest in group 5, significantly higher in group 4 than in groups 1 and 3, but similar in groups 1 and 3. Furthermore, the mRNA expression of eNOS, an index of anti-inflammatory mediator/endothelial cell integrity, was lowest in group 2 and highest in groups 1 and 5, significantly higher in group 4 than in group 3, but similar in groups 1 and 5 (Table 2).
Flow cytometric analysis and histopathology of kidney
The upper panel of Figure 1 (Figure 1A,B,C) illustrated the flow cytometric results of rat ADMSCs and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) on day 14 after cell culturing. The results showed that CD90+ cells contributed the highest population of stem cells.
To determine the effects of CsA, ADMSC transplantation and a combination of these treatments on IR-induced renal injury, a histological scoring system based on the typical microscopic features of acute tubular damage (including extensive tubular necrosis and dilatation, cast formation and loss of brush border) was adopted (Figure 1, lower panel). At 72 hours after the IR procedure, this injury score was highest in group 2, significantly higher in group 3 than in groups 1, 4 and 5, significantly higher in group 4 than in groups 1 and 5, and significantly higher in group 5 than in group 1. These findings suggest that CsA monotherapy significantly protected the kidney from IR damage, but that ADMSC therapy offered significantly more protection than CsA. Combination therapy using CsA plus ADMSCs, however, offered significantly better protection than either of these monotherapies.
Infiltrated CD68+ cells and superoxide dismutase activity in kidney
Expressions of antioxidant activity and vascular density in kidney
Staining for α-smooth muscle actin showed that the number of small vessels in kidney parenchyma was highest in group 1 and lowest in group 2, significantly higher in group 5 than in groups 3 and 4, but similar in groups 3 and 4 (Figure 4G to L).
Angiogenesis biomarkers of kidney
Molecular-cellular damaged biomarkers in kidney
Protein expressions of inflammatory, reactive oxygen species and cytochrome C biomarkers in kidney
As expected, at 72 hours after the IR procedure, the protein expressions of mitochondrial Bax (Figure 8G) and cleaved PARP (Figure 8I), two indices of apoptotic mediators, were higher in group 2 and lowest in group 1, significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 than in group 5, but similar in groups 3 and 4. Protein expression of cleaved caspase 3 (Figure 8H), another indicator of apoptosis, showed an identical pattern to Bax and PARP in groups 1, 2, 3 and 5; this parameter was also significantly higher in group 3 than in group 4.
From tissues harvested at 72 hours post IR injury, total mitochondrial cytochrome C protein expression was lowest in group 2 and highest in group 1, significantly lower in groups 3 and 4 than in group 5, but similar in groups 3 and 4 (Figure 8K). The total amount of cytosolic cytochrome C protein expression showed a reverse pattern to mitochondrial cytochrome C in the five groups. These findings indicate that the expression of cytochrome C, an index of energy supply and storage in mitochondria, was preserved by either CsA or ADMSC monotherapy but better preserved by combination therapy using CsA and ADMSC (Figure 8J). The highest level of cytosolic cytochrome C in group 2 also suggests significant mitochondrial damage with cytochrome C release into the cytosol in the ischemic kidney.
Protein expressions of oxidative stress and antioxidant mediators in kidney
The results of our study demonstrated that systemic combination therapy using CsA and ADMSC was superior to either monotherapy alone at significantly decreasing IR-induced acute kidney injury by inhibiting IR-triggered macrophage recruitment, DNA damage, inflammation, oxidative stress and ROS generation, and by activating the cellular apoptotic signaling pathway and enhancing angiogenic and antioxidant factors. These findings have important clinical relevance in that CsA and ADMSC combination therapy may quickly serve as a new and promising management strategy against acute kidney injury without ethical barriers, especially in patients rejecting renal transplants.
The most important finding in the present study was that the serum levels of BUN and creatinine, two essential indices of renal function, were substantially increased in acute kidney IR animals compared with sham controls. Additionally, the ratio of urine protein to creatinine, a useful indicator of renal functional impairment, was remarkably increased in acute kidney IR animals compared with sham controls. Furthermore, histopathological renal injury scores were significantly higher in kidney IR animals than in sham controls, but were significantly improved by either CsA or ADMSC monotherapy. Of importance, this study is the first to demonstrate that combination therapy using CsA and ADMSC was superior to either monotherapy alone at reversing impaired renal function and protecting the kidney from acute IR injury.
Previous studies have clearly shown that acute inflammation played an essential role in organ injury in the setting of IR [5, 6]. The present study showed that inflammatory mediators (that is, matrix metalloproteinase-9, TNFα, RANTES, NF-κB, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, platelet-derived growth factor, CD68+ cells, SOD activity) were markedly higher in animals that underwent the IR procedure than in animals that did not, consistent with other studies [5, 6]. The role of the immunosuppressant/anti-inflammatory CsA has been well investigated [21, 23]. Growing data have demonstrated that ADMSCs also have a distinctive capacity to suppress inflammation [5, 6, 28]. In the present study, the expressions of these inflammatory biomarkers were remarkably reduced equally by either CsA or ADMSC monotherapy, corroborating the findings of others [5, 6, 21, 23, 28]. Of particular importance, however, was that combination therapy using CsA and ADMSC provided a significantly more profound effect at reducing inflammatory mediators. This finding lends at least some explanation to why kidney IR injury was attenuated by either monotherapy alone and yet was further attenuated by the co-treatment regimen.
Organ damage from acute IR has been shown principally to result from the ROS burst during reperfusion of ischemic tissues that can trigger the opening of the MPT pore [11–14]. The generation of ROS, in turn, contributes to the production of apoptotic mediators, inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress [11–14]. One important finding in the current study was that, compared with normal controls, the protein expressions of oxidative stress (that is, oxidized protein), ROS (NOX-1, NOX-2) and enzymatic analysis of SOD activity were significantly enhanced in animals after acute kidney IR without treatment. Additionally, the apoptotic biomarkers (Bax, caspase 3, PARP) and cellular–molecular damage biomarker (γH2AX) were significantly increased in kidney IR animals compared with sham controls. The findings of the present study therefore strengthen the findings of previous studies [11–14]. These parameters were significantly ameliorated by CsA or ADMSC monotherapy, lending support to previous studies that have also shown CsA or ADMSC had anti-apoptotic and anti-ROS/antioxidative stress capacities [5, 6, 21, 23]. Distinctive to the current study was that co-treatment using CsA and ADMSC was superior to either monotherapy alone at ameliorating these mediators. These findings again partially explain why acute kidney IR injury was reduced further by our CsA and ADMSC co-treatment strategy. Surprisingly, the number of proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells in the kidney, a sign of repair and regeneration, was found to be notably increased in the IR animals without treatment compared with those animals with treatment. We suggest that this could be explained as a result of a rigorous and struggling response to the IR injury.
In contrast to the findings of inflammatory, oxidative stress and ROS biomarkers, the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory biomarkers (HO-1, NQO 1, GPx, GR, IL-10, prostaglandin E2, eNOS) were notably lower in IR animals that were significantly reversed by either CsA or ADMSC treatment. The impact of ADMSC or CsA on enhancing the generation of antioxidant/anti-inflammatory mediators and hence protecting against organ damage from ischemia or IR have been emphasized by previous reports [5, 6, 21, 23–25]; in this way, our findings were consistent with those of others. However, we demonstrated that combination therapy with CsA and ADMSCs contributed enhanced generation of these advantageous biomarkers, lending further explanation to why kidney IR injury was diminished more by co-treatment with CsA and ADMSC than mono-treatment with either.
Of interest, IF staining revealed significantly lower numbers of endothelial surface markers (that is, CD31+ and vWF+ cells) and EPC surface markers (that is, CXCR4+, SDF-1α+ cells) in IR animals being significantly preserved by CsA therapy, but being preserved significantly better by ADMSC therapy. One previous study has also demonstrated that autologous transfusion of ADMSCs to animals with acute IR-injured kidney enhanced angiogenesis in IR kidney tissue , supporting our findings. More importantly, combination therapy with CsA and ADMSC not only contributed to an increase in the numbers of endothelial cell and EPC surface markers but also to an increased number of small vessels (representing angiogenesis) in IR-injured kidney. These findings lend further explanation to why renal function was better preserved and kidney injury scores were further reduced in animals receiving co-treatment with CsA and ADMSC.
Our results strongly indicate that combination therapy using both CsA and ADMSCs provided superior protection against acute IR-induced kidney injury then either monotherapy alone. We highlight the clinical relevance of this co-treatment regimen for patients with acute kidney IR injury, especially in those experiencing rejection of their renal transplant. Furthermore, our results may provide important clinical relevance to the possibility of cyclosporine withdrawal in transplant patients by adding ADMSCs to mitigate complications of prolonged immunosuppressive therapy.
Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell
Bcl-2-associated X protein
Blood urea nitrogen
C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4
Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase
Endothelial progenitor cell
- H & E:
Hematoxylin and eosin
Mitochondrial permeability transition
Mesenchymal stem cell
Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
NADPH dehydrogenase (quinone)-1
Polymerase chain reaction
Regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and presumably secreted
Reactive oxygen species
Stromal cell-derived factor-1α
Tumor necrosis factor
Phosphorylated H2A histone family member X.
This study was supported by a program grant from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University (Grant number: CMRPG8B0231).
- Parikh CR, Coca SG, Wang Y, Masoudi FA, Krumholz HM: Long-term prognosis of acute kidney injury after acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2008, 168: 987-995. 10.1001/archinte.168.9.987.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friedericksen DV, Van der Merwe L, Hattingh TL, Nel DG, Moosa MR: Acute renal failure in the medical ICU still predictive of high mortality. S Afr Med J. 2009, 99: 873-875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R: Acute renal failure. Lancet. 2005, 365: 417-430.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sementilli A, Franco M: Renal acute cellular rejection: correlation between the immunophenotype and cytokine expression of the inflammatory cells in acute glomerulitis, arterial intimitis, and tubulointerstitial nephritis. Transplant Proc. 2010, 42: 1671-1676. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.11.042.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen YT, Sun CK, Lin YC, Chang LT, Chen YL, Tsai TH, Chung SY, Chua S, Kao YH, Yen CH, Shao PL, Chang KC, Leu S, Yip HK: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell protects kidneys against ischemia-reperfusion injury through suppressing oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 51-10.1186/1479-5876-9-51.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun CK, Yen CH, Lin YC, Tsai TH, Chang LT, Kao YH, Chua S, Fu M, Ko SF, Leu S, Yip HK: Autologous transplantation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells markedly reduced acute ischemia-reperfusion lung injury in a rodent model. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 118-10.1186/1479-5876-9-118.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yen CH, Lin KC, Leu S, Sun CK, Chang LT, Chai HT, Chung SY, Chang HW, Ko SF, Chen YT, Yip HK: Chronic exposure to environmental contaminant nonylphenol exacerbates adenine-induced chronic renal insufficiency: role of signaling pathways and therapeutic impact of rosuvastatin. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012, 46: 455-467. 10.1016/j.ejps.2012.03.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thadhani R, Pascual M, Bonventre JV: Acute renal failure. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334: 1448-1460. 10.1056/NEJM199605303342207.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xue JL, Daniels F, Star RA, Kimmel PL, Eggers PW, Molitoris BA, Himmelfarb J, Collins AJ: Incidence and mortality of acute renal failure in Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2001. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006, 17: 1135-1142. 10.1681/ASN.2005060668.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ali T, Khan I, Simpson W, Prescott G, Townend J, Smith W, Macleod A: Incidence and outcomes in acute kidney injury: a comprehensive population-based study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007, 18: 1292-1298. 10.1681/ASN.2006070756.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Q, Camara AK, Stowe DF, Hoppel CL, Lesnefsky EJ: Modulation of electron transport protects cardiac mitochondria and decreases myocardial injury during ischemia and reperfusion. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007, 292: C137-C147.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Q, Moghaddas S, Hoppel CL, Lesnefsky EJ: Ischemic defects in the electron transport chain increase the production of reactive oxygen species from isolated rat heart mitochondria. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008, 294: C460-C466.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirayama A, Nagase S, Ueda A, Oteki T, Takada K, Obara M, Inoue M, Yoh K, Hirayama K, Koyama A: In vivo imaging of oxidative stress in ischemia–reperfusion renal injury using electron paramagnetic resonance. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005, 288: F597-F603. 10.1152/ajprenal.00020.2004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nilakantan V, Hilton G, Maenpaa C, Van Why SK, Pieper GM, Johnson CP, Shames BD: Favorable balance of anti-oxidant/pro-oxidant systems and ablated oxidative stress in Brown Norway rats in renal ischemia–reperfusion injury. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007, 304: 1-11. 10.1007/s11010-007-9480-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Halestrap AP, Pasdois P: The role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in heart disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1787: 1402-1415. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.12.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Javadov S, Karmazyn M, Escobales N: Mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening as a promising therapeutic target in cardiac diseases. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009, 330: 670-678. 10.1124/jpet.109.153213.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morin D, Assaly R, Paradis S, Berdeaux A: Inhibition of mitochondrial membrane permeability as a putative pharmacological target for cardioprotection. Curr Med Chem. 2009, 16: 4382-4398. 10.2174/092986709789712871.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Argaud L, Gateau-Roesch O, Muntean D, Chalabreysse L, Loufouat J, Robert D, Ovize M: Specific inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition prevents lethal reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005, 38: 367-374. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2004.12.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim JS, Jin Y, Lemasters JJ: Reactive oxygen species, but not Ca2+ overloading, trigger pH- and mitochondrial permeability transition-dependent death of adult rat myocytes after ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006, 290: H2024-H2034. 10.1152/ajpheart.00683.2005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Argaud L, Gateau-Roesch O, Chalabreysse L, Gomez L, Loufouat J, Thivolet-Bejui F, Robert D, Ovize M: Preconditioning delays Ca2+−induced mitochondrial permeability transition. Cardiovasc Res. 2004, 61: 115-122. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2003.11.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yuen CM, Sun CK, Lin YC, Chang LT, Kao YH, Yen CH, Chen YL, Tsai TH, Chua S, Shao PL, Leu S, Yip HK: Combination of cyclosporine and erythropoietin improves brain infarct size and neurological function in rats after ischemic stroke. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 141-10.1186/1479-5876-9-141.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piot C, Croisille P, Staat P, Thibault H, Rioufol G, Mewton N, Elbelghiti R, Cung TT, Bonnefoy E, Angoulvant D, Macia C, Raczka F, Sportouch C, Gahide G, Finet G, André-Fouët X, Revel D, Kirkorian G, Monassier JP, Derumeaux G, Ovize M: Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 473-481. 10.1056/NEJMoa071142.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheu JJ, Chua S, Sun CK, Chang LT, Yen CH, Wu CJ, Fu M, Yip HK: Intra-coronary administration of cyclosporine limits infarct size, attenuates remodeling and preserves left ventricular function in porcine acute anterior infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2011, 147: 79-87. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.08.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yip HK, Chang LT, Wu CJ, Sheu JJ, Youssef AA, Pei SN, Lee FY, Sun CK: Autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell therapy prevents the damage of viable myocardium and improves rat heart function following acute anterior myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2008, 72: 1336-1345. 10.1253/circj.72.1336.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leu S, Sun CK, Sheu JJ, Chang LT, Yuen CM, Yen CH, Chiang CH, Ko SF, Pei SN, Chua S, Youssef AA, Wu CJ, Yip HK: Autologous bone marrow cell implantation attenuates left ventricular remodeling and improves heart function in porcine myocardial infarction: an echocardiographic, six-month angiographic, and molecular-cellular study. Int J Cardiol. 2011, 150: 156-168. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.03.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Assmus B, Schachinger V, Teupe C, Britten M, Lehmann R, Dobert N, Grunwald F, Aicher A, Urbich C, Martin H, Hoelzer D, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM: Transplantation of Progenitor Cells and Regeneration Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI). Circulation. 2002, 106: 3009-3017. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000043246.74879.CD.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dai W, Hale SL, Martin BJ, Kuang JQ, Dow JS, Wold LE, Kloner RA: Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects. Circulation. 2005, 112: 214-223. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.527937.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Blanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth SE, Ringden O: Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently of the major histocompatibility complex. Scand J Immunol. 2003, 57: 11-20. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2003.01176.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thum T, Bauersachs J, Poole-Wilson PA, Volk HD, Anker SD: The dying stem cell hypothesis: immune modulation as a novel mechanism for progenitor cell therapy in cardiac muscle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 46: 1799-1802. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.053.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shi D, Liao L, Zhang B, Liu R, Dou X, Li J, Zhu X, Yu L, Chen D, Zhao RC: Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitate the immunosuppressive effect of cyclosporin A on T lymphocytes through Jagged-1-mediated inhibition of NF-κB signaling. Exp Hematol. 2011, 39: 214-224. 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.10.009. e211PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melnikov VY, Faubel S, Siegmund B, Lucia MS, Ljubanovic D, Edelstein CL: Neutrophil-independent mechanisms of caspase-1- and IL-18-mediated ischemic acute tubular necrosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 1083-1091.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun CK, Chang LT, Sheu JJ, Chiang CH, Lee FY, Wu CJ, Chua S, Fu M, Yip HK: Bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell therapy alleviates left ventricular remodeling and improves heart function in rat-dilated cardiomyopathy. Crit Care Med. 2009, 37: 1197-1205. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819c0667.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.