Synergistic effect of Indian hedgehog and bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene transfer to increase the osteogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells
© Reichert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 May 2013
Accepted: 30 August 2013
Published: 2 September 2013
To stimulate healing of large bone defects research has concentrated on the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).
In the present study, we induced the overexpression of the growth factors bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and/or Indian hedgehog (IHH) in human MSCs by adenoviral transduction to increase their osteogenic potential. GFP and nontransduced MSCs served as controls. The influence of the respective genetic modification on cell metabolic activity, proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, mineralization in cell culture, and osteogenic marker gene expression was investigated.
Transduction had no negative influence on cell metabolic activity or proliferation. ALP activity showed a typical rise-and-fall pattern with a maximal activity at day 14 and 21 after osteogenic induction. Enzyme activity was significantly higher in groups cultured with osteogenic media. The overexpression of BMP-2 and especially IHH + BMP-2 resulted in a significantly higher mineralization after 28 days. This was in line with obtained quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analyses, which showed a significant increase in osteopontin and osteocalcin expression for osteogenically induced BMP-2 and IHH + BMP-2 transduced cells when compared with the other groups. Moreover, an increase in runx2 expression was observed in all osteogenic groups toward day 21. It was again more pronounced for BMP-2 and IHH + BMP-2 transduced cells cultured in osteogenic media.
In summary, viral transduction did not negatively influence cell metabolic activity and proliferation. The overexpression of BMP-2 in combination with or without IHH resulted in an increased deposition of mineralized extracellular matrix, and expression of osteogenic marker genes. Viral transduction therefore represents a promising means to increase the osteogenic potential of MSCs and the combination of different transgenes may result in synergistic effects.
The majority of bone defects and fractures show spontaneous healing, stimulated by well-orchestrated endogenous cell populations and microenvironmental cues. Generally, treatment outcomes have improved because of advances regarding surgical techniques and implant design. However, different factors, such as biomechanical instability and extensive soft tissue trauma, can ultimately promote the formation of nonunions and defects characterized by a restricted regenerative potential . Such bone defects are associated with considerable surgical challenges and have a high socioeconomic impact, greatly curtailing affected patients’ quality of life [2, 3]. The augmentation of large bone defects usually requires the application of autologous bone graft (ABG). Limiting associated factors include graft availability, comorbidity, and insufficient bony integration.
Research in the field has therefore concentrated on the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are able to differentiate into bone-forming osteoblasts . Successful translation of tissue engineering concepts to the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery has suggested the extension to long bone regeneration [5, 6]. However, promising results obtained in vitro or in small animal models could seldom be reproduced in the human organism .
In the present study, we therefore induced the overexpression of the growth factors bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and/or Indian hedgehog (IHH) in human MSCs by adenoviral transduction to increase their osteogenic potential.
The beneficial effects of BMP-2 on osteogenic differentiation are well documented . The hedgehog pathway plays a critical role in skeletogenesis, controlling self-renewal, migration, differentiation, and cell-fate commitment of embryonic as well as adult stem or progenitor cells . All hedgehog proteins consist of a signal peptide, with a well-conserved N-terminal region serving the role of a signaling peptide. Hedgehog signal transduction is mediated by Smoothened (Smo), a G protein-coupled receptor with specificity toward Gi proteins . Hedgehog-targeted cells present two components of the hedgehog-receptor complex on the cell surface: Smoothened (Smo) and Patched (Ptc). Ptc represses the activity of Smo, which regulates proteolytic processing of downstream zinc-finger transcription factors Gli1, 2, and 3. Although Gli2 rather seems to function as an activator, Gli3 acts mainly as a repressor .
We therefore hypothesized that MSCs overexpressing BMP-2 and/or IHH represent a powerful tool with a superior regenerative potential to native MSC. BMP transduction was chosen, as de novo bone formation in vivo is partly attributed to members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily, specifically the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)  that were shown to have clinical utility in the treatment of recalcitrant nonunions  or spinal fusion  when delivered as recombinant proteins. The hedgehog pathway conversely plays a critical role in skeletogenesis that implicates mesenchymal precursors [15, 16].
Materials and methods
MSC isolation and culture
Human MSCs were isolated as described previously . After informed consent, freshly reamed trabecular bone from the acetabulum of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty was transferred to 50 ml conical tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) containing Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; PAA Laboratories, Linz, Austria) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; PAA) and antibiotics (50 IU penicillin/ml and 50 μg streptomycin/ml, PAA). The tubes were vortexed to disperse the marrow cells from the bone plugs. After centrifugation to high density pellets the released cells could be collected. The extracted cells were counted with a haemocytometer and plated at a density of 3 × 106 cells per 175 cm2 tissue culture flask (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany). After 2 days of culture, non-adherent cells were removed and the attached cells were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Cells were subsequently plated at a density of 3000/cm2 and expanded to the second or third passage for further experiments.
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Würzburg in Germany.
Generation and propagation of recombinant adenoviral vectors
First-generation, E1-, E3-deleted, serotype 5 adenoviral vectors carrying the cDNAs for human IHH, BMP-2, or green fluorescent protein (GFP) were constructed by using cre-lox recombination, as described previously [18, 19]. The resulting vectors were designated Ad.IHH, Ad.BMP-2, and Ad.GFP. The vectors were propagated by amplification in 293/Cre8 cells and purified over cesium chloride gradients. After dialysis against 10 mM Tris-hydrochloric acid, pH 7.8, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM magnesium chloride, and 4% sucrose, viral titers were estimated to be between 1010 and 1011 infectious viral particles (ip)/ml, as assessed by optical density measurements and a standard plaque assay.
Transduction of MSC cultures and transgene expression
At confluence, MSC cultures were infected in 4 ml/175 cm2 of serum-free DMEM for 3 hours with 50 ip/cell of Ad.IHH, Ad.BMP-2, or in combination. Control cultures were similarly infected with similar doses of Ad.GFP or remained uninfected. After viral infection, the supernatant was aspirated and replaced with 20 ml of complete DMEM.
Media conditioned over a period of 24 hours were collected at several time points and assayed for IHH (Cusabio Biotech, Newark, DE, USA) and BMP-2 (R&D Systems) by using commercially available ELISA kits.
Adherent passage 3 MSCs were seeded in triplicate at 3,000 per square centimeter in flat-bottomed 24-well plates and maintained in 1-ml standard culture medium, consisting of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS for 1, 3, 5, or 7 days in a humidified atmosphere (37°C, 5% CO2). At each time point, cells were washed twice with PBS and stored at −80°C until analysis. For analysis, samples were digested overnight with 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K in 1 × Tris-EDTA buffer at 55°C. DNA content for 100 μl of each sample in triplicate was measured and quantified by using a Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit, according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm.
Cell metabolic activity
Each cell type was seeded at a density of 3 × 103 cells/cm2 in 100 μl culture media (phenol red free) in triplicate onto black 96-well plates and cultured for 4, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours without media change. Two hours before the assay, 10 μl of AlamarBlue reagent (DAL1025; Biosource, Camarillo, CA, USA) were added to the culture medium at a final concentration of 10% (vol/vol). AlamarBlue added to medium served only as a negative control. Fluorescent signals (excitation 540 nm, emission 600 nm) were detected by using a fluorescence plate reader.
Osteogenic induction of MSC cultures
Human MSCs were seeded at a density of 3,000 cells/cm2 into six-well polystyrene tissue-culture plates. After reaching confluence, mineralization was induced by supplementing the culture media with 50 μg/ml ascorbate-2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.1 μM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich) over a period of 28 days. Controls were cultured in normal culture medium. Media were changed every 3 days.
Alkaline phosphatase activity
Cultures were washed and incubated with 1 ml phenol red- and serum-free DMEM for 24 hours. Then 100 μl media supernatant was transferred in triplicate to a 96-well plate (Nunc). After 3 hours of incubation with 100 μl p-nitrophenylphosphate/0.2 M Tris buffer at a concentration of 1 mg/ml (Sigma), optical density at 405 nm was measured. ALP activity was normalized against the sample DNA content, determined by using a Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit (Invitrogen).
Alizarin red S
Cultures were washed twice with double-distilled water (ddH2O), fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 minutes, and incubated with 1% alizarin red S (Sigma-Aldrich) in ddH2O, pH 4.1, for 10 minutes at room temperature. After removal of the unincorporated dye, samples were washed at least 3 times with ddH2O and air-dried. Images of stained monolayers were captured with inverted-phase microscopy. The staining was quantified as described previously .
After 28 days, 2D cultures were washed with ddH2O and incubated with 800 μl of 10% acetic acid for 30 minutes at RT. Samples were heated to 85°C for 10 minutes, followed by a 10-minute incubation step on ice. Then 200 μl of 10% ammonium hydroxide was added to 500 μl of each sample. Triplicate 10-μl aliquots were transferred into a 96-well plate, to which 100 μl of a mono-ethanolamine buffer, pH 11.0, was added for a 3-minute incubation at 37°C, followed by 100 μl of o-cresolphthalein complexion (Calcium O-Cresolphthalein Kit; MTI Diagnostics, Wiesbaden, Germany) and incubation for 5 minutes at 37°C. To generate a standard curve, a standard dilution series in 10% acetic acid was used. Measurements were taken at λ = 570 nm.
RNA isolation, primer design, and qRT-PCR
qRT-PCR primer sequences
Sequence (5′-3′; F, forward;, R, reverse)
F – GTACGAGCTGAACAGGAACAACG
R – CTTGGCTTTTCCTTCATGGTG
F – TATGATGGCCGAGGTGATAG
R – CATTCAACTCCTCGCTTTCC
F – TGACCACATCGGCTTTCAG
R – AAGGGGAAGAGGAAAGAAGG
F – CTTCACAAATCCTCCCCAAG
R – ATGCGCCCTAAATCACTGAG
F – TCGTGGTGGTGCTAAGAAAA
R – TCTCGACGAAGGCGACTAAT
Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA (IBM SPSS 19.0), and p values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Monolayer cultures infected with Ad.IHH, Ad.BMP-2, Ad.GFP or Ad.IHH, and Ad.BMP-2 in combination at 50 ip/cell generated high levels of transgene products at day 7 of culture, with doses ranging from 130 to 160 pg/ml for BMP-2 and 160 to 250 pg/ml for IHH. The amount of transgene declined over time, as evidenced by ELISA measurements (Figure 1c and d).
OP and OC both showed a significant increase in expression over time for all groups cultured in osteogenic media compared with day 0 and cultures in control media. On day 28, a significantly higher expression was observed for both genes in the groups transduced with BMP-2 and BMP-2 + IHH, whereas the highest expression was determined for cells simultaneously overexpressing BMP-2 and IHH (Figure 4c through f).
As with ALP, runx2 showed a significantly increasing expression pattern up to day 21 in osteogenic cultures to decrease further toward day 28. The expression of the transcription factor on day 21 was significantly higher in the BMP-2 and BMP-2 + IHH groups. In noninduced controls, runx2 expression remained on basal levels (Figure 4g and h).
Sufficient bone healing is strongly dependent on the efficient and coordinated migration, proliferation, and differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells at the site of injury. Well-orchestrated molecular pathways precisely control this process. Hedgehog signaling is known to contribute to regulate tissue self-renewal processes, and the migration, differentiation, and cell-fate commitment of embryonic as well as adult stem or progenitor cells .
After binding their cell-surface receptors patched-1 and smoothened, hedgehog signal transduction occurs via members of the Gli family of zinc-finger transcription factors (Gli1, 2, and 3) . The hedgehog pathway was previously reported to be involved in skeletal morphogenesis . It could be demonstrated that IHH-null mouse embryos lack the typical perichondral expression of osteogenic markers such as runx2, collagen type I, and ALP. It was therefore suggested that IHH signaling influences early osteoblastogenesis by modulation of runx2.
In the present study, we investigated whether adenoviral delivery of Indian hedgehog (IHH) is suitable to increase the osteogenic potential adult human mesenchymal progenitor cells. Our results indicate that with our specific experimental settings, IHH alone fails to do so, as (when compared with controls), no increased mineralization was observed in osteogenically induced MSC cultures transduced with IHH. However, when combined with simultaneous adenoviral BMP-2 transduction, IHH appeared to accelerate mineralization and to promote the expression of the osteogenic markers osteopontin and osteocalcin. Both mineralization and marker expression were greater than the sum of effects observed in cultures transduced solely with BMP-2 or IHH. Consequently, IHH and BMP-2 seemed to act synergistically.
Bone morphogenetic proteins are well-studied members of the TGF-β superfamily. Among several of their functions, BMPs induce the formation of both bone and cartilage by stimulating the cellular events of mesenchymal progenitor cells . However, only a subset of BMPs, specifically BMP-2, -4, -7, and -9, have osteoinductive activity .
As mentioned earlier, in conjunction with BMP-2, IHH appears to have a synergistic effect on osteogenesis in the mesenchymal cell type used in our study. Conversely, sonic hedgehog (SHH)-induced osteoblastic differentiation seems to require functional BMP signaling . Consequently, hedgehog (HH) proteins and BMP-2 were shown to induce ALP activity synergistically in KS483 cells . Moreover, both IHH and SHH treatment were shown to stimulate ALP activity synergistically with BMP-2 in C3H10T1/2 cells and MC3T3-E1 cells . Similarly, recombinant N-terminal SHH could cause a greater number of cells to respond to BMP-2, increasing ALP activity, as demonstrated in C3H10T1/2, ST2, and primary mouse calvaria cells . ALP is considered a marker for osteoblastic activity in vitro. ALP activity usually displays a typical increase/decrease pattern , which is in line with our findings.
It was also reported that hedgehog influence might depend on the extent of terminal cell differentiation. Rather, committed osteogenic lineages, such as preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells and osteoblastic cell lines, did not respond to SHH in the presence of BMP-2. C3H10T1/2 cells that display pluripotent characteristics, conversely did show a response . Consequently, the contribution of HH to osteoblastogenesis appears of greater importance in the early stages of differentiation. This may have contributed to the positive effects observed in our study, in which undifferentiated, multipotent MSCs were used. Study reports describing mouse perichondrial osteoblastic progenitors to undergo chondrogenesis rather than osteoblastogenesis in absence of IHH signaling  further support this hypothesis.
Notably, all HH proteins consist of a signal peptide with a highly conserved N-terminal region. As a result, HH ligands are functionally interchangeable , and observations made for SHH can most likely be transferred to IHH.
The literature suggests that the effect of HH on osteoblast differentiation, with or without BMP, may differ between species. HH, in synergy with BMP, appears to promote osteoblastogenesis in mice, nonsynergistic or even antagonistic effects may occur in other species. In a rat model, SHH enhanced endochondral ossification mediated by runx2, but no increase in ossification was observed when low amounts of BMP-4 were simultaneously administered . In human adipose-derived stem cells, SHH even inhibited osteogenesis, as measured by decreased ALP and runx2 expression .
Runx2, also referred to as core-binding factor subunit alpha-1 (CBF-α-1), is considered a master gene for osteoblast differentiation, matrix production, and mineralization during bone formation. In our study, runx2 was significantly upregulated through the synergistic effects of BMP-2 and IHH transduction. Runx2 expression is necessary to achieve differentiation and activation of osteoblasts. Its null mutation in mice exhibits the complete absence of bone . Runx2 expression is upregulated in proliferative chondrocytes, and it is expressed early in osteoblastic differentiation. Multiple signal-transduction pathways can stimulate runx2 gene expression . Runx2, conversely, can directly control the expression of essential bone-associated extracellular matrix protein genes mediated by a direct binding site (osteoblast-specific cis-acting element (OSE2)). OSE2 can be found in the promoter region of various osteoblast-specific genes, such as OC, OP, BSP, and collagen type I[33, 34].
The noncollagenous extracellular matrix components, such as OC and OP, contribute to provide bone with its physical and chemical properties . OC is partly incorporated into the bone matrix, partly delivered to the circulatory system, and considered a late and specific osteogenic marker determining terminal osteoblast differentiation regulating bone crystal formation . We observed a significantly higher OC expression on day 28 after the combined adenoviral transduction of BMP-2 and IHH.
OP is yet another key modulator of bone function. In our cell-culture experiments, the simultaneous action of BMP-2 and IHH resulted in a significant upregulation of OP expression. OP is considered an early osteogenic marker with affinity for calcium and binding sites for integrin receptors through a RGD motif. OP, therefore, functions as an important protein for matrix-cell interaction . Through the RGD motif, osteopontin mediates the attachment and activation of osteoclasts  and can facilitate attachment of bone cells to mineralized tissue surfaces .
Our results generally suggest that adenoviral modification of bone growth-associated cells by simultaneous transduction with BMP-2 and IHH represents a promising way to stimulate osseous healing. Nevertheless, these results must be confirmed by thorough in vivo investigations.
Furthermore, viral transduction is eyed skeptically in treating nonlethal conditions in humans .
Adenoviruses are DNA viruses. Their genomes rarely integrate into host-cell DNA. Nevertheless, transgene expression by these viruses is congruent with the requirements of healing bone. With adenoviruses, the chosen recombinant vector can be produced at high titer. Furthermore, adenovirus displays a high infectivity toward many cell types .
Disadvantages of adenovirus certainly include its high antigenicity , as many individuals possess circulating, neutralizing antibodies. These antibodies might reduce the effectiveness of adenovirus-based gene therapy. Moreover, the caused inflammatory response may negatively influence the healing process . No consensus exists concerning the most appropriate vectors and transgenes, and, consequently, further research is needed.
Autologous bone graft
Bone morphogenetic protein 2
Bone sialo protein
Dulbecco modified eagle medium
Fetal bovine serum
Green fluorescent protein
Infectious viral particle
Mesenchymal stem cell
Osteoblast-specific cis-acting element
The work was supported by the association for orthopaedic research. The publication was additionally funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the University of Würzburg within the funding program Open Access Publishing.
- Perry CR: Bone repair techniques, bone graft, and bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999, 360: 71-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeCoster TA, Gehlert RJ, Mikola EA, Pirela-Cruz MA: Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004, 12: 28-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clements JR, Carpenter BB, Pourciau JK: Treating segmental bone defects: a new technique. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008, 47: 350-356. 10.1053/j.jfas.2008.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao C, Seuntjens J, Kaufman GN, Tran-Khanh N, Butler A, Li A, Wang H, Buschmann MD, Harvey EJ, Henderson JE: Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation to promote bone healing. J Orthop Res. 2012, 30: 1183-1189. 10.1002/jor.22028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muschler GF, Raut VP, Patterson TE, Wenke JC, Hollinger JO: The design and use of animal models for translational research in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2010, 16: 123-145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grayson WL, Frohlich M, Yeager K, Bhumiratana S, Chan ME, Cannizzaro C, Wan LQ, Liu XS, Guo XE, Vunjak-Novakovic G: Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 3299-3304. 10.1073/pnas.0905439106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meijer GJ, de Bruijn JD, Koole R, van Blitterswijk CA: Cell-based bone tissue engineering. PLoS Med. 2007, 4: e9-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheng H, Jiang W, Phillips FM, Haydon RC, Peng Y, Zhou L, Luu HH, An N, Breyer B, Vanichakarn P, Szatkowski JP, Park JY, He TC: Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 1544-1552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ingham PW, McMahon AP: Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 3059-3087. 10.1101/gad.938601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogden SK, Fei DL, Schilling NS, Ahmed YF, Hwa J, Robbins DJ: G protein Galphai functions immediately downstream of Smoothened in Hedgehog signalling. Nature. 2008, 456: 967-970. 10.1038/nature07459.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasaki H, Nishizaki Y, Hui C, Nakafuku M, Kondoh H: Regulation of Gli2 and Gli3 activities by an amino-terminal repression domain: implication of Gli2 and Gli3 as primary mediators of Shh signaling. Development. 1999, 126: 3915-3924.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fisher DM, Wong JM, Crowley C, Khan WS: Preclinical and clinical studies on the use of growth factors for bone repair: a systematic review. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013, 8: 260-268. 10.2174/1574888X11308030011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Dimitriou R, Gill I, Kolimarala V, Montgomery RJ: The synergistic effect of autograft and BMP-7 in the treatment of atrophic nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009, 467: 3239-3248. 10.1007/s11999-009-0846-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deyo RA, Ching A, Matsen L, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Jarvik JG, Angier H, Mirza SK: Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion surgery for older adults with lumbar stenosis: trends, complications, repeat surgery, and charges. Spine. 2012, 37: 222-230. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821bfa3a.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferguson CM, Miclau T, Hu D, Alpern E, Helms JA: Common molecular pathways in skeletal morphogenesis and repair. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1998, 857: 33-42. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10105.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McMahon AP, Ingham PW, Tabin CJ: Developmental roles and clinical significance of hedgehog signaling. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003, 53: 1-114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noth U, Osyczka AM, Tuli R, Hickok NJ, Danielson KG, Tuan RS: Multilineage mesenchymal differentiation potential of human trabecular bone-derived cells. J Orthop Res. 2002, 20: 1060-1069. 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00018-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinert AF, Palmer GD, Pilapil C, Noth U, Evans CH, Ghivizzani SC: Enhanced in vitro chondrogenesis of primary mesenchymal stem cells by combined gene transfer. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009, 15: 1127-1139. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0252.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinert AF, Weissenberger M, Kunz M, Gilbert F, Ghivizzani SC, Gobel S, Jakob F, Noth U, Rudert M: Indian hedgehog gene transfer is a chondrogenic inducer of human mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012, 14: R168-10.1186/ar3921.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reichert JC, Woodruff MA, Friis T, Quent VM, Gronthos S, Duda GN, Schutz MA, Hutmacher DW: Ovine bone- and marrow-derived progenitor cells and their potential for scaffold-based bone tissue engineering applications in vitro and in vivo. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2010, 4: 565-576. 10.1002/term.276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Q, Huang C, Zeng F, Xue M, Zhang X: Activation of the Hh pathway in periosteum-derived mesenchymal stem cells induces bone formation in vivo: implication for postnatal bone repair. Am J Pathol. 2010, 177: 3100-3111. 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100060.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu H, Hilton MJ, Tu X, Yu K, Ornitz DM, Long F: Sequential roles of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in osteoblast development. Development. 2005, 132: 49-60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans CH: Gene delivery to bone. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012, 64: 1331-1340. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.013.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spinella-Jaegle S, Rawadi G, Kawai S, Gallea S, Faucheu C, Mollat P, Courtois B, Bergaud B, Ramez V, Blanchet AM, Adelmant G, Baron R, Roman-Roman S: Sonic hedgehog increases the commitment of pluripotent mesenchymal cells into the osteoblastic lineage and abolishes adipocytic differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2001, 114: 2085-2094.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Horst G, Farih-Sips H, Lowik CW, Karperien M: Hedgehog stimulates only osteoblastic differentiation of undifferentiated KS483 cells. Bone. 2003, 33: 899-910. 10.1016/j.bone.2003.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura T, Aikawa T, Iwamoto-Enomoto M, Iwamoto M, Higuchi Y, Pacifici M, Kinto N, Yamaguchi A, Noji S, Kurisu K, Matsuya T: Induction of osteogenic differentiation by hedgehog proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 237: 465-469. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Porter JR, Henson A, Popat KC: Biodegradable poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanowires for bone tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2009, 30: 780-788. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Long F, Chung UI, Ohba S, McMahon J, Kronenberg HM, McMahon AP: Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development. 2004, 131: 1309-1318. 10.1242/dev.01006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krishnan V, Ma Y, Moseley J, Geiser A, Friant S, Frolik C: Bone anabolic effects of sonic/indian hedgehog are mediated by bmp-2/4-dependent pathways in the neonatal rat metatarsal model. Endocrinology. 2001, 142: 940-947. 10.1210/en.142.2.940.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plaisant M, Fontaine C, Cousin W, Rochet N, Dani C, Peraldi P: Activation of hedgehog signaling inhibits osteoblast differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009, 27: 703-713. 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aberg T, Cavender A, Gaikwad JS, Bronckers AL, Wang X, Waltimo-Siren J, Thesleff I, D’Souza RN: Phenotypic changes in dentition of Runx2 homozygote-null mutant mice. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004, 52: 131-139. 10.1177/002215540405200113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu TM, Lee EH: Transcriptional regulatory cascades in runx2-dependent bone development. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013, 19: 254-263. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0527.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G: Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell. 1997, 89: 747-754. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80257-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kern B, Shen J, Starbuck M, Karsenty G: Cbfa1 contributes to the osteoblast-specific expression of type I collagen genes. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 7101-7107. 10.1074/jbc.M006215200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Price PA, Otsuka AA, Poser JW, Kristaponis J, Raman N: Characterization of a gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-containing protein from bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976, 73: 1447-1451. 10.1073/pnas.73.5.1447.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boskey AL, Gadaleta S, Gundberg C, Doty SB, Ducy P, Karsenty G: Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic analysis of bones of osteocalcin-deficient mice provides insight into the function of osteocalcin. Bone. 1998, 23: 187-196. 10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00092-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ganss B, Kim RH, Sodek J: Bone sialoprotein. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1999, 10: 79-98. 10.1177/10454411990100010401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ross FP, Chappel J, Alvarez JI, Sander D, Butler WT, Farach-Carson MC, Mintz KA, Robey PG, Teitelbaum SL, Cheresh DA: Interactions between the bone matrix proteins osteopontin and bone sialoprotein and the osteoclast integrin alpha v beta 3 potentiate bone resorption. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 9901-9907.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JH, Tang J, Wang J, Ma W, Zheng W, Yoneda T, Chen J: Over-expression of bone sialoprotein enhances bone metastasis of human breast cancer cells in a mouse model. Int J Oncol. 2003, 23: 1043-1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans CH, Ghivizzani SC, Robbins PD: Progress and Prospects: genetic treatments for disorders of bones and joints. Gene Ther. 2009, 16: 944-952. 10.1038/gt.2009.73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Douglas JT: Adenoviral vectors for gene therapy. Mol Biotechnol. 2007, 36: 71-80. 10.1007/s12033-007-0021-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evans CH: Gene therapy for bone healing. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2010, 12: e18-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.