Porcine adipose-derived stem cells from buccal fat pad and subcutaneous adipose tissue for future preclinical studies in oral surgery
- Stefania Niada†1, 2,
- Lorena Maria Ferreira†1,
- Elena Arrigoni1,
- Alessandro Addis3,
- Marino Campagnol3,
- Eugenio Broccaioli1 and
- Anna Teresa Brini1, 2Email author
© Niada et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 May 2013
Accepted: 26 November 2013
Published: 11 December 2013
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are progenitor cells used in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Despite subcutaneous adipose tissue being more abundant, the buccal fat pad (BFP) is easily accessible for dentists and maxillofacial surgeons. For this reason, considering the need for preclinical study and the swine as an optimal animal model in tissue engineering applications, we compared the features of porcine ASCs (pASCs) from both tissue-harvesting sites.
ASCs were isolated from interscapular subcutaneous adipose tissue (ScI) and buccal fat pads of six swine. Cells were characterized for their stemness and multipotent features. Moreover, their osteogenic ability when cultured on titanium disks and silicon carbide-plasma-enhanced chemical vapor-deposition fragments, and their growth in the presence of autologous and heterologous serum were also assessed.
Independent of the harvesting site, no differences in proliferation, viability, and clonogenicity were observed among all the pASC populations. Furthermore, when induced toward osteogenic differentiation, both ScI- and BFP-pASCs showed an increase of collagen and calcified extracellular matrix (ECM) production, alkaline phosphatase activity, and osteonectin expression, indicating their ability to differentiate toward osteoblast-like cells. In addition, they differentiated toward adipocyte-like cells, and chondrogenic induced pASCs were able to increase glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) production over time. When cells were osteoinduced on synthetic biomaterials, they significantly increased the amount of calcified ECM compared with control cells; moreover, titanium showed the osteoinductive effect on pASCs, also without chemical stimuli. Finally, these cells grew nicely in 10% FBS, and no benefits were produced by substitution with swine serum.
Swine buccal fat pad contains progenitor cells with mesenchymal features, and they also osteo-differentiate nicely in association with synthetic supports. We suggest that porcine BFP-ASCs may be applied in preclinical studies of periodontal and bone-defect regeneration.
Dental tissue engineering may now represent an innovative approach to replacing bone and periodontal ligament lost, through the delivery of bioactive molecules and the use of suitable scaffolds and cells. Advanced research in this field leads to rapid progress in tissue repair and regeneration of oral tissues. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), because of their ability to self-renew, their multidifferentiative potential toward mesodermal cells[1–3], and their plasticity toward cells of ectodermal and endodermal[5, 6] origin, are considered proper candidates for these applications. Bone marrow is still the elected source for MSCs, although adipose tissue, in the last decade, gained recognition, because adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) can be easily extracted with mild donor-site morbidity or patient discomfort. The first ASCs were isolated from subcutaneous adipose tissue, which is usually discarded after aesthetic surgical procedures. Several studies have also described the presence of ASCs in visceral adipose tissue, human orbital fat tissue[10, 11], and from special fat pads such as the Hoffa pad.
Here, we propose the buccal fat pad (BFP) as a new source for ASCs, which could be of great interest for odontoiatric and maxillofacial surgeons who consider the tissue-engineering approach to be a possible future goal.
The BFP is located between the masseter and buccinators muscles and the ascending mandibular ramus and zygomatic arch, and it is easily accessible with a simple surgical procedure under local anesthesia. Since 1977, the BFP has been used in surgery for the treatment of congenital oroantral and/or oronasal diseases, congenital cleft palate repair, oral submucous fibrosis[17, 18], intraoral malignant defects, and cheek mucosa defects[15, 20]. In addition, BFP is a discarded tissue of plastic surgery for cheek reduction. Recent studies showed that human ASCs isolated from the BFP possess all the suitable characteristics for bone tissue engineering, both in vitro and in vivo. Despite the known low immunogenicity of human ASCs, which suggests theoretically their use in preclinical models, we are required to test their safety when implanted in a homologous setting. Considering the potential ability of ASCs in bone regeneration, we have chosen swine as a preclinical model because their bone shares several features with the human bone, such as rate of healing, morphology, anatomy, mineral density, and composition. Furthermore, the oral maxillofacial region of these animals is similar in anatomy, development, physiology, pathophysiology, and disease occurrence to the human one. Therefore these animals might be considered appropriate for oral disease models and in orofacial research; they were recently used in preclinical models of dental implants[26–28] and maxillofacial surgery[29–31].
Despite the great variety of supports used in tissue engineering, titanium is widely used in dental surgery, due to its high mechanical and corrosion resistance, as well as its biocompatibility. Interestingly, silicon carbide (SIC), with its hardness and wear-resistance, may be an innovative material suitable to coat metallic implants, giving adequate protection to the material and decreasing the wear rate of the inserted devices. Moreover, SIC obtained by the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor-deposition technique (SIC-PECVD) does not negatively influence any biologic features of human ASCs, in vitro, and SIC particles do not give rise to any relevant inflammatory response and do not negatively affect bone growth in vivo.
In this study, we described some of the features of ASCs isolated from swine BFP and interscapular subcutaneous adipose tissue from the same animal, and their osteodifferentiation ability in vitro, either in the absence or in the presence of titanium and SIC supports. Finally, pASCs cultured in the presence of autologous and heterologous serum have been also investigated.
Materials and methods
Isolation of porcine adipose-derived stem cells (pASCs)
Fat tissues and blood samples were collected at the end of preclinical studies approved by the Italian Ministry of Health and were performed at the CRABBC (Biotech Research Centre for Cardiothoracic Applications) (Rivolta d’Adda, CR). All the procedures were carried out in conformity with institutional guidelines in compliance with national (Law 116/92, Authorization n.169/94-A issued December 19, 1994, by the Italian Ministry of Health) and international laws and policies (EEC Council Directive 86/609, OJ L 358. 1, December 12, 1987).
About 5 × 103 cells/cm2 were maintained in culture for three passages, and regularly detached and counted. Proliferation rate was expressed as doubling time (DT), calculated as follows: ln(N/N0)/ln2, in which N represents the number of counted cells, and N0 represents the number of seeded ones.
MTT cell-viability assay
To test the viability of cells, 1.5 × 104 pASCs/cm2 were plated in 96-well plates, and monitored at days 1, 3, and 7. Then 100 μl of MTT (3-[4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; Sigma-Aldrich) (final concentration, 0.5 mg/ml in DMEM) was added, and cells were maintained for 4 additional hours at 37°C. Formazan precipitates were solubilized by 100% DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide; Sigma-Aldrich), and absorbance was read at 570 nm in a Wallac Victor II plate reader (Perkin Elmer Western Europe, Monza, Italy).
Fibroblast-colony-forming unit assay (CFU-F)
pASCs were plated in DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS, 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine, in six-well plates by serial dilution starting from 1,000 cells/well. After 6 days, the medium was replaced, and, at day 10, cells were washed, fixed in 100% methanol, and stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). The frequency of the CFU-F was established by counting individual colonies (of at least 25 cells) compared with the number of seeded cells.
The pASCs (3 × 105) in 100 μl of PBS with 1% FBS and 0.1% NaN3 were incubated for 30 minutes on ice with monoclonal antibodies raised against CD14, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD271 (Ancell, Bayport, MN, USA). In particular, CD73, CD90, and CD105 were chosen according to the minimal criteria for defining mesenchymal stem cells[35, 36]. Specific binding was revealed by either streptavidin-PE– or fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated sheep anti-mouse antibody. Samples were acquired by MACSQuant Analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec, Italy), and data were analyzed by using MACSQuantify Software (Miltenyi Biotec).
Cells were maintained in either control or osteogenic medium (OSTEO, DMEM, 10% FBS, 10 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM glycerol-2-phosphate, 150 μM L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 10 nM cholecalciferol; Sigma-Aldrich) in 24-well plates at the density of 2 × 104, 1 × 104, and 5 × 103 pASCs/well for 7, 14, and 21 days, respectively.
After 7 and 14 days, to determine collagen production, cells were stained with 0.1% (wt/vol) Sirius Red F3BA in saturated picric acid (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 hour at room temperature, and then the samples were extracted with 0.1 M NaOH for 5 minutes. Absorbance was read at 550 nm, as previously. Standard curve of known concentration of calf-skin type I collagen (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to determine the concentration of secreted collagen.
Extracellular matrix (ECM) calcification, at 14 and 21 days, was determined on fixed ASCs stained by 40 mM Alizarin Red-S (AR-S, pH 4.1; Fluka). Mineral deposition was quantified by incubating the stained sample with 10% wt/vol cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC; Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 15 minutes to extract AR-S. Absorbance was read at 550 nm with a Wallac Victor II plate reader. To evaluate alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enzymatic activity, both undifferentiated and differentiated ASCs were lysed in 50 μl of 0.1% Triton X-100 and incubated at 37°C with 10 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate dissolved in 100 mM diethanolamine and 0.5 mM MgCl2, pH 10.5. Samples were read at 405 nm, and ALP activity was standardized with respect to the sample protein concentration determined by BCA Protein Assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA).
Osteonectin (ON) expression was also analyzed with Western blot: both undifferentiated and osteo-differentiated cells were lysed in 50 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P40, 0.1% sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail. Then 20 μg of protein extracts was resolved by 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories), electrotransferred onto HybondTM-ECLTM extra nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare), and probed with either mouse anti-ON (1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and mouse anti-β-actin (1:5,000 dilution, Sigma-Aldrich). Specific proteins were revealed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) and the ECL Western Blotting Analysis System Kit (GE Healthcare), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Porcine ASCs were induced to differentiate toward the adipogenic lineage, as previously described. In brief, 1.5 × 104 pASCs/cm2 were plated and cultured in control medium supplemented with 1 μM dexamethasone, 10 μg/ml insulin, 500 μM 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine, and 200 μM indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich). At 14 days later, cells were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 1 hour and stained with fresh Oil Red O solution (20 mg/ml (wt/vol) Oil Red O in 60% isopropanol) for 15 minutes. Lipid vacuoles were quantified by extraction with 200 μl of 100% isopropanol for 10 minutes and reading the absorbance of 50 μl at 490 nm with the Wallac Victor II plate reader.
Then 5 × 105 pASCs were cultured in micromasses in chondrogenic medium (DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS, 100 nM dexamethasone, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, 150 μM L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 1× insulin-transferrin selenium (ITS) and 10 ng/ml TGF-β1) for 21 days. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) production was assessed with dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay, as previously described[39, 40]. In brief, micromasses were digested at 56°C overnight by 100 μl of 50 μg/ml proteinase K in 100 mM K2HPO4 (pH 8.0). After 10 minutes at 90°C to inactivate the enzyme, the samples were spun at 14,000 g for 10 minutes, and each supernatant was collected for GAGs and DNA quantification. The samples were then incubated at room temperature in 40 mM glycine/NaCl (pH 3) with 16 mg/ml DMMB, and the absorbance was read at 500 nm with the Wallac Victor II plate reader. The amount of GAGs was determined with respect to known concentrations of chondroitin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich) and normalized on total DNA content determined as described later. Then 0.2 μg/ml Hoechst 33258 was added to the samples for 1 minute at room temperature, fluorescence was measured (excitation at 340 to 370 nm; emission, 440 to 460 nm), and DNA concentration for each sample determined with respect to the standard curve of salmon sperm DNA.
ASC culture and osteogenic differentiation on biomaterials
Both ScI- and BFP-pASCs were seeded at 5 × 103/cm2 on titanium disk (kindly provided by Permedica S.p.A., Merate, Italy) and silicon carbide–plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor deposition (SIC) fragments (kindly provided by CETEV, Centro Tecnologico del Vuoto, Carsoli, AQ, Italy) either in CTRL or OSTEO medium. To determine cells adhering to the biomaterials, both undifferentiated and differentiated pASCs for 21 days, were lysed in 0.1% Triton X-100, and protein concentration was determined by BCA Protein Assay, as described earlier. Meanwhile, in adjacent wells, calcified ECM deposition was determined, and compared with the one produced by plastic-adherent (PA) cells.
Porcine serum collection
Then 10 ml of blood from each animal was allowed to clot for 30 to 45 minutes at 37°C and then transferred at 4°C for 30 minutes. After centrifugation (1,000 g for 10 minutes), sera were collected under sterile conditions and maintained at -20°C until their use.
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed by using Student t test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
Comparison between porcine ASCs isolated from two different body sites
Raw adipose tissue (ml)
3 ♂, 3 ♀
12.3 ± 3.6
3 ♂, 3 ♀
5.7 ± 1.5
Osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation of ScI-pASCs and BFP-pASCs
Although BFP-pASCs showed a slightly lower basal level of collagen deposition with respect to ScI-pASCs, these differences at 7 and 14 days were not significant. Collagen level significantly increased by about 42% and 310% in 7 days osteoinduced ScI- and BFP-pASCs, respectively, compared with undifferentiated cells (CTRL); this upregulation further increased for ScI-pASCs (+87%) and was maintained (+254%) for BFP-pASCs (Figure 4A,B). In addition, osteodifferentiated pASCs produced abundant amounts of calcified ECM, and in 2 weeks, ECM calcification increased by about 118% and 116% for ScI- and for BFP-pASCs, respectively (Figure 4C,D). Meanwhile, ALP activity was also determined: after 1 week of culture, we observed an upregulated ALP activity in both osteo-differentiated ScI and BFP cells, compared with undifferentiated ones, with increases of 126% and 201%, respectively (Figure 4E). This trend was also maintained after 14 days (Figure 4E). In Figure 4F, we show that osteonectin (ON) expression is induced of about 336% and 306% in osteodifferentiated ScI- and BFP-pASCs, respectively.
Then we also determined GAGs content in both chondrogenic differentiated pASCs for 1, 2, and 3 weeks. We observed an increase of GAGs deposition during that time. Indeed, after 14 days, the GAG content, with respect to 7 days, was more abundant at 56% and 45% in ScI- and BFP-pASCs, respectively, and it was further upregulated after 21 days (+184% and +149% for ScI- and BFP-pASCs, respectively) (Figure 5B). We conclude that both pASCs display in vitro the multipotent feature of mesenchymal stem cells.
pASCs on biomaterials
Both pASCs, cultured on biomaterials, differentiated toward cells of the osteogenic lineage. Indeed, pASCs seeded on TIT, and osteodifferentiated, deposited an increased amount of calcified ECM of about 46% and 37% for ScI- and BFP-pASCs, respectively, compared with CTRL cells; similarly, ScI- and BFP-pASCs on SIC, increased ECM deposition of 90% and 200%, respectively, compared with CTRL cells.
Moreover, TIT is osteoinductive for pASCs; we quantified an increase of calcified ECM of about 91% in CTRL ScI-pASCs, and of about 234% in CTRL BFP-pASCs, compared with plastic-adherent cells (Figure 6A).
Culture of pASCs in porcine serum
We investigated the possibility of isolating porcine ASCs from Buccal Fat Pads (BFP-pASCs), which have similar stemness features to the ones isolated from subcutaneous tissue (ScI-pASCs), previously characterized. Human BFP-ASCs might be quite easily applied in oral tissue engineering, because this tissue is rapidly accessible by dentists and maxillofacial surgeons. However, before moving to the clinic, it is mandatory to perform approved preclinical studies to validate the safety and efficacy of cellular therapies. The most used large-animal model of human oral bone defects is swine[31, 42], because these animals present a healing potential comparable to that of the human. Several studies have been conducted by using stem cells in oral diseases and orofacial research: Wilson et al. investigated bone regeneration in the pig mandible ramus by either local or systemic ASCs injection, concluding that both treatments accelerate the healing process, without any significant difference between the two routes of administration. In another study, similar results were obtained combining decidua stem cells with a β-TCP scaffold in a minipig model.
Here we compared pASCs derived from two different body areas and evaluated their behavior in vitro to identify a convenient source for future preclinical studies. BFP-pASCs were very similar to ScI-pASCs. Although the cellular yield of the porcine ASCs was lower than the human one, after 30 days in culture, we could have been able to obtain a homogeneous populations of about 108 to 109 cells, with still a pronounced clonogenic ability.
Both cell populations, analyzed at passage 4, were CD90+, CD271-, CD45-, and CD14-. These results are similar to the ones on porcine MSCs from different tissues, and to our results on human mesenchymal stem cells from the Bichat fat pad that express CD90, CD73, and CD105, as defined for human mesenchymal stromal cells[35, 36].
In conclusion, both cell populations were highly positive for CD90, one of the main MSC surface antigens, whereas no cross-reactivity has been observed for CD73 and CD105. Although limited, these results are consistent with the ones obtained with porcine MSCs from bone marrow.
Furthermore, by a molecular approach of RT-PCR, we have preliminary data on the expression of Kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf-4), a marker of immature stem cells involved in the control of cell multipotency in many development-related processes and in the maintenance of stem cell-associated properties. The mRNA expression levels in BFP-pASCs are comparable to the ones in human-ASCs. We consider this result interesting, because we recently showed that Klf-4 expression in hASCs seems to be related to the cell proliferation, clonogenic ability, and differentiative potential, and to be downregulated by the pathologic condition (obesity) of patients from which cells were isolated.
Besides, all the porcine BFP-ASCs, grown in the presence of inductive stimuli, nicely increased both osteogenic and adipogenic features, as already described for subcutaneous porcine ASCs[34, 49, 50]. At last, both populations are able to progressively depose GAGs during 3D culture when induced to chondro-differentiate. Altogether, these results suggest our claim that swine buccal fat pad contains progenitor cells of the mesenchymal stromal cell family, similar to the human ones.
Because these cells could be used in preclinical studies of tissue engineering, and their interaction with appropriate supports is essential, we evaluated the ability of both pASCs to grow and differentiate onto two synthetic scaffolds: the former, a widely used biomaterial in dental surgeries (titanium), and the latter, a promising candidate for the coating of some portions of implant (SiC-PECVD). Like human ASCs, pASCs adhere and differentiate on both scaffolds. Moreover, the osteoinductive properties of titanium on hASCs, were also observed on both porcine progenitor cells, whereas SIC-PECVD did not modulate their osteogenic differentiation.
Next, testing porcine autologous or heterologous sera, we detected that pASCs proliferated slower than cells cultured in the presence of FBS, and they dramatically stopped growing, changed morphology, and aggregated in clusters. These data are consistent with previous data by Schwarz et al., in which equine ASCs cultured with autologous serum proliferate less than with FBS. Differently, our results are in contrast with data obtained with human ASCs, in which it has been shown that the use of autologous serum favors or does not influence ASCs proliferation[21, 51, 52]. Nevertheless, Kurita et al. showed that among four human ASC populations, only one proliferates faster when cultured with autologous serum. This discrepancy has also been observed for human bone marrow stem cells[54–57], suggesting that other factors may influence cell growth. This issue requires further investigation to be clarified, although we have shown that both pASCs behaved similarly.
Our data suggest that the buccal fat pad might be a novel source of MSCs. This region contains a population of progenitor cells with stemness features that are able to differentiate in vitro and also are associated with synthetic supports. This is quite relevant for maxillofacial and dental surgeons, because for them, human BFP is an easily reachable and convenient area. Human ASCs have been isolated from small specimens of BFP (1 ml of tissue), and they are similar to the most known ScI-ASCs[21, 58]. Data about human cells and previous data on pASCs[2, 8, 34] are consistent with our work, indicating that BFP-ASCs are comparable with ASCs isolated from human and porcine subcutaneous tissue. Although it could be debatable to isolate cells from a very small fat pad, we think that progenitor cells derived from a nearby area of the defect could push toward a proper use of BFP-ASCs in oral clinical studies. The natural localization of BFP-ASCs could make them more prone to respond to stimuli naturally secreted in the mouth, as we previously observed regarding the osteoinductive properties on human BFP-ASCs of amelogenin, the most abundant enamel matrix protein. For preclinical test, the low immunogenicity of mesenchymal stem cells might be exploited by using heterologous porcine BFP-ASCs, because in swine, the buccal fat pad is not so easily accessible as in the humans.
Our data support future clinical applications of human BFP-ASCs in a tissue-engineering approach for oral and maxillofacial diseases, and we suggest swine as a convenient preclinical model to test new bioconstructs.
Adipose-derived stem cells
Buccal fat pad
Dulbecco modified Eagle medium
Fetal bovine serum
Mesenchymal stem cells
3-[4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
Standard error of the mean
Silicon carbide–plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition
Stromal vascular fraction
This study was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (2007–656853), University grant FIRST-2008 and RC-2044 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi (Milano). The authors thank Dr. S. Fenu (Fondazione INGM, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica Molecolare, Milano) for his valuable help with confocal microscopy.
- Lee JH, Kemp DM: Human adipose-derived stem cells display myogenic potential and perturbed function in hypoxic conditions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 341: 882-888. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Girolamo L, Sartori MF, Arrigoni E, Rimondini L, Albisetti W, Weinstein RL, Brini AT: Human adipose-derived stem cells as future tools in tissue regeneration: osteogenic differentiation and cell-scaffold interaction. Int J Artif Organs. 2008, 31: 467-479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu G, Floyd ZE, Wu X, Halvorsen YD, Gimble JM: Isolation of human adipose-derived stem cells from lipoaspirates. Methods Mol Biol. 2011, 702: 17-27. 10.1007/978-1-61737-960-4_2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujimura J, Ogawa R, Mizuno H, Fukunaga Y, Suzuki H: Neural differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells isolated from gfp transgenic mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 333: 116-121. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banas A, Teratani T, Yamamoto Y, Tokuhara M, Takeshita F, Quinn G, Okochi H, Ochiya T: Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells as a source of human hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2007, 46: 219-228. 10.1002/hep.21704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timper K, Seboek D, Eberhardt M, Linscheid P, Christ-Crain M, Keller U, Muller B, Zulewski H: Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into insulin, somatostatin, and glucagon expressing cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 341: 1135-1140. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 1991, 9: 641-650. 10.1002/jor.1100090504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu Y, Liu T, Song K, Fan X, Ma X, Cui Z: Adipose-derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSC. Cell Biochem Funct. 2008, 26: 664-675. 10.1002/cbf.1488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baglioni S, Cantini G, Poli G, Francalanci M, Squecco R, Di Franco A, Borgogni E, Frontera S, Nesi G, Liotta F, Lucchese M, Perigli G, Francini F, Forti G, Serio M, Luconi M: Functional differences in visceral and subcutaneous fat pads originate from differences in the adipose stem cell. Plos One. 2012, 7: e36569-10.1371/journal.pone.0036569.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korn BS, Kikkawa DO, Hicok KC: Identification and characterization of adult stem cells from human orbital adipose tissue. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 25: 27-32. 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181912292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho JH, Ma WH, Tseng TC, Chen YF, Chen MH, Lee OK: Isolation and characterization of multi-potent stem cells from human orbital fat tissues. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011, 17: 255-266. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jurgens WJ, van Dijk A, Doulabi BZ, Niessen FB, Ritt MJ, van Milligen FJ, Helder MN: Freshly isolated stromal cells from the infrapatellar fat pad are suitable for a one-step surgical procedure to regenerate cartilage tissue. Cytotherapy. 2009, 11: 1052-1064. 10.3109/14653240903219122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abad-Gallegos M, Figueiredo R, Rodriguez-Baeza A, Gay-Escoda C: Use of Bichat’s buccal fat pad for the sealing of orosinusal communications: a presentation of 8 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011, 16: e215-e219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer E, Liebenberg SJ, Fagan JJ: Buccal fat pad: a simple, underutilised flap. S Afr J Surg. 2012, 50: 47-49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Egyedi P: Utilization of the buccal fat pad for closure of oro-antral and/or oro-nasal communications. J Maxillofac Surg. 1977, 5: 241-244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levi B, Kasten SJ, Buchman SR: Utilization of the buccal fat pad flap for congenital cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009, 123: 1018-1021. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f80f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saravanan K, Narayanan V: The use of buccal fat pad in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis: a newer method. Int J Dent. 2012, 2012: 935135-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Surej KL, Kurien NM, Sakkir N: Buccal fat pad reconstruction for oral submucous fibrosis. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010, 1: 164-167. 10.4103/0975-5950.79222.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chakrabarti J, Tekriwal R, Ganguli A, Ghosh S, Mishra PK: Pedicled buccal fat pad flap for intraoral malignant defects: a series of 29 cases. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009, 42: 36-42. 10.4103/0970-0358.53010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrari S, Ferri A, Bianchi B, Copelli C, Magri AS, Sesenna E: A novel technique for cheek mucosa defect reconstruction using a pedicled buccal fat pad and buccinator myomucosal island flap. Oral Oncol. 2009, 45: 59-62. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.03.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broccaioli E, Niada S, Rasperini G, Ferreira LM, Arrigoni E, Yenagi V, Brini AT: Mesenchymal stem cells from Bichat’s fat pad: in vitro comparison with adipose-derived stem cells from subcutaneous tissue. Biores Open Access. 2013, 2: 107-117. 10.1089/biores.2012.0291.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi T, Sumita Y, Wakamastu Y, Nagai K, Asahina I: Formation of engineered bone with adipose stromal cells from buccal fat pad. J Dent Res. 2012, 91: 592-597. 10.1177/0022034512445633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thorwarth M, Schultze-Mosgau S, Kessler P, Wiltfang J, Schlegel KA: Bone regeneration in osseous defects using a resorbable nanoparticular hydroxyapatite. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005, 63: 1626-1633. 10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J: Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 663-670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang S, Liu Y, Fang D, Shi S: The miniature pig: a useful large animal model for dental and orofacial research. Oral Dis. 2007, 13: 530-537. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01337.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terheyden H, Jepsen S, Rueger DR: Mandibular reconstruction in miniature pigs with prefabricated vascularized bone grafts using recombinant human osteogenic protein-1: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999, 28: 461-463. 10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80063-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nkenke E, Lehner B, Weinzierl K, Thams U, Neugebauer J, Steveling H, Radespiel-Troger M, Neukam FW: Bone contact, growth, and density around immediately loaded implants in the mandible of mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003, 14: 312-321. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.120906.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W: Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007, 18: 662-668. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiltfang J, Kloss FR, Kessler P, Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Zimmermann R, Schlegel KA: Effects of platelet-rich plasma on bone healing in combination with autogenous bone and bone substitutes in critical-size defects: an animal experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004, 15: 187-193. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00980.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henkel KO, Gerber T, Dorfling P, Gundlach KK, Bienengraber V: Repair of bone defects by applying biomatrices with and without autologous osteoblasts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005, 33: 45-49. 10.1016/j.jcms.2004.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson SM, Goldwasser MS, Clark SG, Monaco E, Bionaz M, Hurley WL, Rodriguez-Zas S, Feng L, Dymon Z, Wheeler MB: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance healing of mandibular defects in the ramus of swine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012, 70: e193-e203. 10.1016/j.joms.2011.10.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopa S, De Girolamo L, Arrigoni E, Stanco D, Rimondini L, Baruffaldi Preis FW, Lanfranchi L, Ghigo M, Chiesa R, Brini AT: Enhanced biological performance of human adipose-derived stem cells cultured on titanium-based biomaterials and silicon carbide sheets for orthopaedic applications. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2011, 25: S35-S42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aspenberg P, Anttila A, Konttinen YT, Lappalainen R, Goodman SB, Nordsletten L, Santavirta S: Benign response to particles of diamond and sic: bone chamber studies of new. Biomaterials. 1996, 17: 807-812. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)81418-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arrigoni E, Lopa S, de Girolamo L, Stanco D, Brini AT: Isolation, characterization and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells: from small to large animal models. Cell Tissue Res. 2009, 338: 401-411. 10.1007/s00441-009-0883-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: the International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006, 8: 315-317. 10.1080/14653240600855905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bourin P, Bunnell BA, Casteilla L, Dominici M, Katz AJ, March KL, Redl H, Rubin JP, Yoshimura K, Gimble JM: Stromal cells from the adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells: a joint statement of the International Federation for Adipose Therapeutics and Science (IFATS) and the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT). Cytotherapy. 2013, 15: 641-648. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.02.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tullberg-Reinert H, Jundt G: In situ measurement of collagen synthesis by human bone cells with a sirius red-based colorimetric microassay: effects of transforming growth factor beta2 and ascorbic acid 2-phosphate. Histochem Cell Biol. 1999, 112: 271-276. 10.1007/s004180050447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halvorsen YD, Franklin D, Bond AL, Hitt DC, Auchter C, Boskey AL, Paschalis EP, Wilkison WO, Gimble JM: Extracellular matrix mineralization and osteoblast gene expression by human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. Tissue Eng. 2001, 7: 729-741. 10.1089/107632701753337681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farndale RW, Buttle DJ, Barrett AJ: Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986, 883: 173-177. 10.1016/0304-4165(86)90306-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolf F, Candrian C, Wendt D, Farhadi J, Heberer M, Martin I, Barbero A: Cartilage tissue engineering using pre-aggregated human articular chondrocytes. Eur Cell Mater. 2008, 16: 92-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwarz C, Leicht U, Rothe C, Drosse I, Luibl V, Rocken M, Schieker M: Effects of different media on proliferation and differentiation capacity of canine, equine and porcine adipose derived stem cells. Res Vet Sci. 2012, 93: 457-462. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.08.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Im GI, Ahn JH, Kim SY, Choi BS, Lee SW: A hyaluronate-atelocollagen/beta-tricalcium phosphate-hydroxyapatite biphasic scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects: a porcine study. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010, 16: 1189-1200. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Y, Liu Y, Zhang CM, Zhang HY, Li WH, Shi S, Le AD, Wang SL: Stem cells from deciduous tooth repair mandibular defect in swine. J Dent Res. 2009, 88: 249-254. 10.1177/0022034509333804.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Girolamo L, Lopa S, Arrigoni E, Sartori MF, Baruffaldi Preis FW, Brini AT: Human adipose-derived stem cells isolated from young and elderly women: their differentiation potential and scaffold interaction during in vitro osteoblastic differentiation. Cytotherapy. 2009, 11: 793-803. 10.3109/14653240903079393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song SH, Kumar BM, Kang EJ, Lee YM, Kim TH, Ock SA, Lee SL, Jeon BG, Rho GJ: Characterization of porcine multipotent stem/stromal cells derived from skin, adipose, and ovarian tissues and their differentiation in vitro into putative oocyte-like cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011, 20: 1359-1370. 10.1089/scd.2010.0203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noort WA, Oerlemans MI, Rozemuller H, Feyen D, Jaksani S, Stecher D, Naaijkens B, Martens AC, Buhring HJ, Doevendans PA, Sluijter JP: Human versus porcine mesenchymal stromal cells: phenotype, differentiation potential, immunomodulation and cardiac improvement after transplantation. J Cell Mol Med. 2012, 16: 1827-1839. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01455.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pei D: Regulation of pluripotency and reprogramming by transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 3365-3369.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Girolamo L, Stanco D, Salvatori L, Coroniti G, Arrigoni E, Silecchia G, Russo MA, Niada S, Petrangeli E, Brini AT: Stemness and osteogenic and adipogenic potential are differently impaired in subcutaneous and visceral adipose derived stem cells (ASCs) isolated from obese donors. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2013, 26: 11-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qu CQ, Zhang GH, Zhang LJ, Yang GS: Osteogenic and adipogenic potential of porcine adipose mesenchymal stem cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2007, 43: 95-100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang L, Yin Y, Zhou H, Song G, Fan A, Tang B, Shi W, Li Z: Proliferative capacity and pluripotent characteristics of porcine adult stem cells derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow. Cell Reprogram. 2012, 14: 342-352.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Im W, Chung JY, Kim SH, Kim M: Efficacy of autologous serum in human adipose-derived stem cells; cell markers, growth factors and differentiation. Cell Mol Biol. 2011, 57: OL1470-OL1475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Choi J, Chung JH, Kwon GY, Kim KW, Kim S, Chang H: Effectiveness of autologous serum as an alternative to fetal bovine serum in adipose-derived stem cell engineering. Cell Tissue Bank. 2012, 14: 413-422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurita M, Aiba-Kojima E, Shigeura T, Matsumoto D, Suga H, Inoue K, Eto H, Kato H, Aoi N, Yoshimura K: Differential effects of three preparations of human serum on expansion of various types of human cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008, 122: 438-448. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d618d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuznetsov SA, Mankani MH, Robey PG: Effect of serum on human bone marrow stromal cells: ex vivo expansion and in vivo bone formation. Transplantation. 2000, 70: 1780-1787. 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamamoto N, Isobe M, Negishi A, Yoshimasu H, Shimokawa H, Ohya K, Amagasa T, Kasugai S: Effects of autologous serum on osteoblastic differentiation in human bone marrow cells. J Med Dent Sci. 2003, 50: 63-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizuno N, Shiba H, Ozeki Y, Mouri Y, Niitani M, Inui T, Hayashi H, Suzuki K, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Kurihara H: Human autologous serum obtained using a completely closed bag system as a substitute for foetal calf serum in human mesenchymal stem cell cultures. Cell Biol Int England. 2006, 30: 521-524. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.01.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shahdadfar A, Fronsdal K, Haug T, Reinholt FP, Brinchmann JE: In vitro expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells: choice of serum is a determinant of cell proliferation, differentiation, gene expression, and transcriptome stability. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 1357-1366. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farre-Guasch E, Marti-Page C, Hernadez-Alfaro F, Klein-Nulend J, Casals N: Buccal fat pad, an oral access source of human adipose stem cells with potential for osteochondral tissue engineering: an in vitro study. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010, 16: 1083-1094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.