Mesenchymal stem cells induce endothelial cell quiescence and promote capillary formation
© Pedersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 9 October 2013
Accepted: 12 February 2014
Published: 17 February 2014
Rapid establishment of functional blood vessels is a prerequisite for successful tissue engineering. During vascular development, endothelial cells (ECs) and perivascular cells assemble into a complex regulating proliferation of ECs, vessel diameter and production of extracellular matrix proteins. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to establish an endothelial-perivascular complex in tissue-engineered constructs comprising ECs and MSCs.
Primary human ECs and MSCs were seeded onto poly(L-lactide-co-1,5-dioxepan-2-one) (poly(LLA-co-DXO)) scaffolds and grown in dynamic culture before subcutaneous implantation in immunocompromised mice for 1 and 3 weeks. Cellular activity, angiogenic stimulation and vascular assembly in cell/scaffold constructs seeded with ECs or ECs/MSCs in a 5:1 ratio was monitored with real-time RT-PCR, ELISA and immunohistochemical microscopy analysis.
A quiescent phenotype of ECs was generated, by adding MSCs to the culture system. Decreased proliferation of ECs, in addition to up-regulation of selected markers for vascular maturation was demonstrated. Baseline expression of VEGFa was higher for MSCs compared with EC (P <0.001), with subsequent up-regulated VEGFa-expression for EC/MSC constructs before (P <0.05) and after implantation (P <0.01). Furthermore, an inflammatory response with CD11b + cells was generated from implantation of human cells. At the end of the 3 week experimental period, a higher vascular density was shown for both cellular constructs compared with empty control scaffolds (P <0.01), with the highest density of capillaries being generated in constructs comprising both ECs and MSCs.
Induction of a quiescent phenotype of ECs associated with vascular maturation can be achieved by co-seeding with MSCs. Hence, MSCs can be appropriate perivascular cells for tissue-engineered constructs.
In tissue engineering, inadequate vascular supply is a limiting factor for the reconstruction of larger defects. The incorporation of bioengineered microvessels derived from vascular endothelial cells (ECs) in cell/scaffold constructs, is an approach attempting to ensure appropriate oxygenation of developing tissue. However, bioengineered vasculature must reach a physiologically functional level in order to supply oxygen and nutrients effectively and depends on supporting cells for stability and maintenance .
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are investigated primarily as progenitor cells capable of regenerating bone, cartilage and adipose tissue, thus being an attractive cell source for tissue engineering. However, implantation of cells into a hypoxic microenvironment might hamper the success of cell based tissue regeneration, and increasing efforts to pre-vascularize constructs with ECs have, therefore, been made.
Milestone discoveries in the study of MSCs are the fibroblastic colony-forming units initiated by single cells , the multilineage potential  and, more recently, a shift in view towards MSCs as tissue-specific progenitors residing in close proximity to the microvasculature of various organs . The latter might serve as a rationale for MSCs as a potential perivascular cell in pre-vascularized constructs for tissue regeneration.
Pericytes are vascular mural cells of microvessels residing alongside ECs within the vascular basement membrane . In the process of blood vessel development, perivascular cells are recruited to tubular ECs, and the endothelial-perivascular complex produces extracellular basement membrane proteins leading to increasingly mature blood vessels . The transition from vascular morphogenesis to a stabilized vasculature, therefore, depends on perivascular cells , the absence of which might lead to non-functional immature vessels . Perivascular cells establish specific focal contacts with the adjacent endothelium , and it has been shown that their presence is beneficial for EC survival . In fact, interactions with pericytes might regulate EC proliferation and differentiation . Mesenchymal precursor cells have shown the ability to differentiate into smooth muscle cells (SMCs) [10, 11], but the ability of MSCs to differentiate into non-skeletal lineages is controversial . Although SMCs can support the development of functional engineered microvessels , they lack the ability to regenerate skeletal tissues. MSCs might, therefore, be a more appropriate cell for tissue engineering applications, where a functional vasculature alongside cells with regenerative potential is required. Previous studies have shown that endothelial microvascular networks can be generated in vitro with supportive cells other than SMCs, including fibroblasts and MSCs [13–15].
This study assessed the effect of MSCs on the vascular endothelium in two- and three-dimensional culture systems, as well as after subcutaneous implantation. Results show that quiescent ECs and vascular maturation was induced by the presence of MSCs. Furthermore, both cellular constructs induced higher vascular density than control scaffolds, with the highest density of capillaries generated from co-implantation of ECs and MSCs.
Cell expansion and characterization
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were purchased from Lonza (Clonetics®, Walkersville, MD, US) and expanded in endothelial cell growth medium (EGM®) (Lonza) containing 500 ml endothelial cell basal medium and supplements: Fetal bovine serum (FBS) 10 ml, bovine brain extract (BBE) 2 ml, human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) 0.5 ml, hydrocortisone 0.5 ml and GA-1000 0.5 ml. Primary human bone-marrow derived stem cells (MSCs) were purchased from StemCell Technologies (Vancouver, BC, Canada), and expanded in MesenCult® complete medium (StemCell Technologies). The purity of MSCs was evaluated by flow cytometry, were it was found that >90% of the cells expressed CD29, CD44, CD105 and CD166 while <1% expressed CD14, CD34 and CD45. Cells no older than passage five were used, and all cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Two- and three-dimensional culture systems
To investigate morphology in vitro, 105 ECs were cultured in six-well plates (NUNC, Roskilde, Denmark) in mono-culture or in co-culture with MSCs in a 5:1 ratio in EGM® culture medium (Lonza). After one week, ECs were stained with TRITC-conjugated UEA-1 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) and MSCs with FITC mouse anti-human CD90 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, US). In order to determine the number of viable ECs, cells in co-culture were separated with CD31 Endothelial Cell Dynabeads® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, US) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ECs were stained with 0.4% trypan blue and counted with a Countess® Automated Cell Counter (Invitrogen).
Previous publications have described the production of poly(LLA-co-DXO) scaffolds , and the seeding of cell/scaffold constructs for in vivo implantation . Briefly, scaffolds were incubated overnight in EGM® (Lonza) culture medium. The next day, each scaffold was seeded with 5 × 105 cells, ECs or ECs/MSCs in a 5:1 ratio. An orbital shaker (Eppendorf®, Hamburg, Germany) was applied for five minutes at 1,000 rpm to facilitate homogenous distribution of cells . Scaffolds were transferred to separate spinner flask bioreactors (Wheaton Science, Millville, NJ, US) the next day and grown in dynamic three-dimensional culture at 50 rpm for one week in EGM® culture medium (Lonza) for both experimental groups. A dermal skin puncher was used to puncture six mm discs, which were either implanted in vivo or processed for analysis.
All animal experiments were approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (Local approval number: 3029) and conducted according to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrates used for Scientific Purposes. Sixteen non-obese severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice (Gade Institute, University of Bergen/Taconic Farms) six- to eight-weeks old were used for implantation of cell/scaffold constructs. An intramuscular injection of 20 μl 1:2 Rompun (Xylazin, 20 mg/ml) (Bayer Health Care, Leverkusen, Germany) and Narketan (Ketamin) (Vétoquinol, Lure, France) was given to anesthetize the animals. A 2.5 cm incision was made on the back of each animal, providing sufficient space for subcutaneous implantation of scaffolds. Vetbond™ Tissue Adhesive (n-butyl cyanoacrylate) (3M™, St. Paul, MN, US) was applied for wound closure. Samples were retrieved after one and three weeks implantation, following euthanasia with deep isoflurane anesthesia (Schering Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, US) and cervical dislocation. Depending on the following analysis, samples were either frozen in liquid nitrogen (RNA-isolation), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (paraffin embedding) or embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) tissue-tech (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) (cryosectioning).
For in vitro and in vivo evaluations of gene expression, extraction of RNA was performed with an E.Z.N.A.® Total RNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, US). A Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, US) was used to quantify and evaluate RNA purity. A high capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, US) was applied for reverse transcription reactions, where total RNA (1,000 ng) was mixed with nuclease free water, reverse transcriptase buffer, random primers, dNTP and MultiScribe reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time RT-PCR was performed on a StepOne™ real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) with standard enzyme and cycling conditions, and cDNA corresponding to 10 ng mRNA in each reaction, prepared in duplicate for each target gene. Human Taqman® gene expression assays were angiopoietin-1 (ANG-1), angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), SM22α, ki67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), CD31, von Willebrand Factor (vWF), vascular endothelial growth factor-a (VEGFa), fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1), platelet derived growth factor-b (PDGFb) and macrophage colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1). Mouse Taqman® gene expression assays were VEGFa, ANG-1, ANG-2, α-SMA and ankyrin repeat domain 1 (ANKRD1).
Embedding with OCT tissue-tech (Sakura Finetek) was done before samples were frozen with 2-methylbutan ReagentPlus® (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, US) and liquid nitrogen. A Leica CM 3050S microtome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to make 8 μm sections at -24°C. Fixation in 4% PFA was used for samples intended for paraffin sectioning before embedding. Sections acquired from the middle part of the samples were deparaffinized and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. CD11b- and CD31-staining was performed with rat anti-mouse primary antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, US) in a 1:200 dilution for four hours at room temperature, with TRITC-conjugated goat anti-rat secondary antibody in a 1:500 dilution for two hours. Circumference and area fraction of individual vessels were outlined using NIS-Elements, BR 3.07 software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). A Nikon 80i microscope (Nikon) was used for imaging.
A commercially available human VEGFa enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, US) was applied for protein analysis of in vitro samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance was measured with a FLUOstar OPTIMA microplate reader (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany) and the values were compared to a known standard curve.
For all statistical tests, P <0.05 was defined as a significant difference. The independent samples t-test was applied for two-group comparisons, whereas a multiple comparison one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to output parameters that included three experimental groups. The Brown-Forsythe test was performed for equality of variances with no significant differences between the groups. To quantify vessels, five images were obtained systematically at 20x magnification for each scaffold (N = 3 for each group). For real time RT-PCR data a comparative Ct method with GAPDH as endogenous control was used, with statistical differences calculated between mean RQ-values for each experimental group. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (N = 3). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, US) and GraphPad Prism Version 6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, US).
Mesenchymal stem cells induce endothelial cell quiescence
In a two-dimensional culture system where cells could be separated, a cell count was performed to assess the number of viable ECs in the two experimental groups over a period of nine days (Figure 1C). A reduced number of ECs was found after seven days, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). After nine days co-culture the number of viable ECs was significantly reduced in the presence of MSCs. Mono-cultured ECs showed a typical cobblestone-like morphology after one week of two-dimensional culture in vitro, and with the addition of MSCs a less proliferative phenotype could be observed (Figure 1D). ECs did not organize into microvascular networks in the presence of MSCs at this ratio (5:1 EC/MSC).
Expression of vascular and perivascular biomarkers before and after implantation
Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor from human cells
Influence of implanted cells on inflammation and establishment of the mouse vasculature
The expression of mouse specific ANKRD1 was used as a biomarker for activation of the mouse endothelium, and results show up-regulated expression in mono-culture compared to empty controls (Figure 5D). The difference between the experimental groups was not statistically significant. As regulation of vessel diameter is an important step in vascular maturation, blood vessels <20 μm were defined as mature microvessels, whereas vessels >50 μm were defined as immature. The remaining blood vessels were defined as transitional. A higher percentage of vessels <20 μm and >50 μm were found for both constructs where human cells were implanted (Figure 5E and F). The percentage of mature vessels (<20 μm) was highest in the EC/MSC-constructs, and the highest density of immature vessels (>50 μm) was detected in the EC group. Both cellular constructs had a higher density of blood vessels and area fraction of the total vasculature compared with the empty controls (Figure 5G). The vessel area fraction, however, was not statistically significant. Functional blood vessels were identified by the presence of erythrocytes in the lumen, and vascularization was evaluated through immunostaining for CD31 (Figure 5C).
In the process of vascular assembly, nascent vessels depend on interaction with perivascular cells to establish an endothelial-perivascular complex regulating vessel growth and maturation. Bioengineered tissues depend on mature blood vessels in order to adequately meet their metabolic demands, and perivascular cells are needed to generate a functional microvasculature. The present study shows how a quiescent phenotype of ECs was induced, by adding a low percentage of MSCs to the culture system. Biomarkers for vascular maturation and angiogenesis were both regulated by MSCs. In addition, MSCs were found to be a potent producer of VEGFa, an essential growth factor in vascular development. At the end of the experimental period, both cell/scaffold constructs induced a higher vascular density than controls, with the highest density of mature vessels being generated in constructs comprising ECs and MSCs.
Expression of endothelial specific ANG-1 and ANG-2 was altered in the presence of MSCs, with an up-regulation of ANG-1 and down-regulation of ANG-2. Competitive binding to the Tie2 receptor for both ligands is well known, and ANG-1 mediates vascular maturation by stabilizing ECs in the quiescent G0-phase, maintaining interactions between ECs, pericytes and the extracellular matrix [19, 20]. ANG-2 is associated with destabilized ECs characteristic for angiogenic sprouting, thus having the opposite effect on the vascular endothelium. Proliferation and differentiation of cells are two processes that tend not to occur simultaneously. In order for nascent vessels to mature into patent tubes with controlled permeability, proliferation of ECs should subside . On the gene level, the expression of cell proliferation biomarkers PCNA and ki67 was determined, with both genes being down-regulated after co-seeding with MSCs. In addition, cell counting revealed fewer viable cells in the presence of MSCs after one week of culture. Our results suggest the presence of MSCs to induce a quiescent phenotype of ECs, via decreased cell proliferation and angiopoietin-expression characteristic of vascular maturation. A potential interpretation error of results after three-dimensional co-culture was to isolate the expression patterns from the two cell types, as retrieval and separation of cells after culture in this highly interconnected scaffold has proven to be difficult. A combination of two- and three-dimensional culture could, therefore, provide more information, as has been performed in comparable experiments , in addition to analyzing factors differentially expressed for the two cell types, such as ANGs, CD31 and vWF (ECs), and pericyte markers (MSCs).
The recruitment of pericytes regulates the transition from vascular morphogenesis to a stabilized vasculature . An increasing consensus regarding a perivascular origin for MSCs has emerged in stem cell biology , and the expression of perivascular markers has also been found for undifferentiated MSCs [23, 24]. With up-regulated expression of both α-SMA and SM22α, one might suggest that ECs have an inductive effect on perivascular differentiation of MSCs. Certainly, biological factors involved in formation of an endothelial-perivascular complex were present in the EC/MSC-group before in vivo implantation. A comparison with mono-cultured MSCs might have been of further interest to strengthen this conclusion, although induced mural-cell differentiation of MSCs has been shown to be regulated by the gap junction Connexin-45, thus depending on direct contact between the two cell types . Regardless of a terminal smooth muscle fate, MSCs have shown the ability to support development of endothelial microvascular networks in direct co-culture systems [15, 24, 26, 27]. Enhanced proliferation of ECs has been reported following indirect co-culture [26, 28], findings supported by the high expression of VEGFa detected from MSCs in the present work, suggesting the vascular assembly itself to be the event that induces the reduced endothelial cell proliferation, rather than secreted factors.
Regeneration in tissue engineering is likely to be caused by both differentiation of implanted cells and subsequent production of extracellular matrix proteins, as well as stimulation of surrounding tissues through the release of paracrine factors. Implantation of labeled cells could provide valuable information in animal models, but this strategy is difficult to apply in humans. The fate of MSCs labeled with luciferase has been followed through bioluminescent imaging subcutaneously and in a spine fusion model in rats . Cells were shown to survive at least two weeks in vivo, but with a decreasing bioluminescent signal after one week. This has been supported in a similar subcutaneous model, as applied in the present work, where implanted MSCs did not survive more than three weeks after implantation . Without perivascular cells, vascular maturation is impaired leading to an endothelium prone to regression [10, 11]. However, signaling to surrounding tissues can still be substantial, and degenerating cells can deliver strong paracrine signals triggering a particular biological response.
When investigating the effect of cell implantation on the expression of angiogenic factors using mouse specific assays, an increase in α-SMA was found for mono-cultured ECs one week post-implantation. This was the opposite regulation as found for α-SMA expressed by implanted cells, which were higher with MSCs in the construct. The possibility for a compensatory down-regulation with implantation of perivascular MSCs could be suggested. The ANKRD1-gene is associated with EC activation and was used as a predictor of mouse specific endothelial activation. At the end of the three-week experimental period the expression was higher for mono-cultured ECs, which correlated with the largest percentage of immature vessels (>50 μm) also being detected in this group. Both findings support an increased vascular maturation achieved through co-implantation of ECs and MSCs. Endothelial cell density has been reported as a determining factor for mRNA expression of ANKRD1, with a high density of ECs associated with down-regulated ANKRD1-expression . We also report here a higher area fraction of CD31+ cells in the EC-group and lower expression of ANKRD1. The other selected vascular factors evaluated from the animal tissue were unchanged, and the pro-angiogenic effects observed could therefore be attributed to the implanted cells, rather than the surrounding tissues. Alternatively, the inflammatory response generated by implantation of human cells contributed to increased expression of angiogenic factors and subsequent vascularization. Although NOD/SCID-mice are unable to undergo VDJ-recombination, we demonstrate the presence of CD11b + cells adjacent to cell/scaffold constructs. Induction of a CD11b + cell population preceding increased angiogenesis has previously been shown in a xenograft tumor transplantation model . In the present work, recruitment of CD11b + cells was similar for both experimental groups, suggesting the xenograft model itself to be the primary causative agent, rather than a particular cell type. MSCs have been shown to possess immunomodulatory properties when transplanted in vivo, even suggesting MSCs as a therapeutic agent for autoimmune disease . A minor down-regulation in the expression of CSF-1 was noted for EC/MSC-constructs one week after implantation, but a higher percentage of MSCs might have been needed to make a substantial effect on the immunological response. Overall, the expression of factors promoting angiogenesis was higher for mono-cultured ECs, such as pro-angiogenic and pericyte recruiting factors PDGFb and FGF-1. This could be due to the induced quiescence in the co-culture group with ECs in the resting G0-phase. However, perhaps the most important factor in vascular development, VEGFa, was significantly higher expressed in MSCs compared with ECs, and subsequently in EC/MSC-constructs. This is in accordance with previous work, where the supernatant from cultured MSCs induced sprouting of ECs . At the end of the experimental period, the vascular density was higher in the co-culture group, which was not expected, due to the reduced activity of ECs. It could be suggested that the importance of VEGF, in fact, makes MSCs constitute a stronger trigger for vascular ingrowth than ECs, itself encouraging for tissue regeneration strategies with MSCs. The higher percentage of mature vessels <20 μm suggests that implantation of ECs with MSCs provides a favorable microenvironment for vascular maturation in a tissue-engineering context.
In conclusion, the presence of MSCs even in low numbers induced a quiescent phenotype of ECs, regulating biomarkers for vascular maturation. Implantation of cell/scaffold constructs induced a higher vascular density than control scaffolds, whereas the highest density of capillaries was achieved through co-seeding of ECs and MSCs. Hence, MSCs can be appropriate perivascular cells for tissue-engineered constructs.
α-smooth muscle actin
ankyrin repeat domain 1
macrophage colony stimulating factor-1
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
fibroblast growth factor-1
mesenchymal stem cells
non-obese severe combined immunodeficient mice
proliferating cell nuclear antigen
platelet derived growth factor-b
reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
smooth muscle cells
vascular endothelial growth factor-a
von Willebrand factor.
The authors thank the Centre for Cancer Biomarkers at the Gade Institute, University of Bergen, for providing HE-sections. This study was supported by the research council of Norway; Stem Cell, Grant Number: 180383/V40 and the VascuBone project, European Union FP7; No. 242175.
- Benjamin LE, Hemo I, Keshet E: A plasticity window for blood vessel remodelling is defined by pericyte coverage of the preformed endothelial network and is regulated by PDGF-B and VEGF. Development. 1998, 125: 1591-1598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS: The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970, 3: 393-403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res. 1991, 9: 641-650. 10.1002/jor.1100090504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ: Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008, 2: 313-319. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armulik A, Abramsson A, Betsholtz C: Endothelial/pericyte interactions. Circ Res. 2005, 97: 512-523. 10.1161/01.RES.0000182903.16652.d7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Betsholtz C, Lindblom P, Gerhardt H: Role of pericytes in vascular morphogenesis. EXS. 2005, 94: 115-125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stratman AN, Malotte KM, Mahan RD, Davis MJ, Davis GE: Pericyte recruitment during vasculogenic tube assembly stimulates endothelial basement membrane matrix formation. Blood. 2009, 114: 5091-5101. 10.1182/blood-2009-05-222364.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holderfield MT, Hughes CC: Crosstalk between vascular endothelial growth factor, notch, and transforming growth factor-beta in vascular morphogenesis. Circ Res. 2008, 102: 637-652. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.167171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franco M, Roswall P, Cortez E, Hanahan D, Pietras K: Pericytes promote endothelial cell survival through induction of autocrine VEGF-A signaling and Bcl-w expression. Blood. 2011, 118: 2906-2917. 10.1182/blood-2011-01-331694.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ding R, Darland DC, Parmacek MS, D'Amore PA: Endothelial-mesenchymal interactions in vitro reveal molecular mechanisms of smooth muscle/pericyte differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2004, 13: 509-520. 10.1089/scd.2004.13.509.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirschi KK, Rohovsky SA, D'Amore PA: PDGF, TGF-beta, and heterotypic cell-cell interactions mediate endothelial cell-induced recruitment of 10T1/2 cells and their differentiation to a smooth muscle fate. J Cell Biol. 1998, 141: 805-814. 10.1083/jcb.141.3.805.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hegen A, Blois A, Tiron CE, Hellesoy M, Micklem DR, Nor JE, Akslen LA, Lorens JB: Efficient in vivo vascularization of tissue-engineering scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011, 5: e52-e62. 10.1002/term.336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asakawa N, Shimizu T, Tsuda Y, Sekiya S, Sasagawa T, Yamato M, Fukai F, Okano T: Pre-vascularization of in vitro three-dimensional tissues created by cell sheet engineering. Biomaterials. 2010, 31: 3903-3909. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Evensen L, Micklem DR, Blois A, Berge SV, Aarsaether N, Littlewood-Evans A, Wood J, Lorens JB: Mural cell associated VEGF is required for organotypic vessel formation. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e5798-10.1371/journal.pone.0005798.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedersen TO, Blois AL, Xue Y, Xing Z, Cottler-Fox M, Fristad I, Leknes KN, Lorens JB, Mustafa K: Osteogenic stimulatory conditions enhance growth and maturation of endothelial cell microvascular networks in culture with mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng. 2012, 3: 2041731412443236-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odelius K, Plikk P, Albertsson AC: Elastomeric hydrolyzable porous scaffolds: copolymers of aliphatic polyesters and a polyether-ester. Biomacromolecules. 2005, 6: 2718-2725. 10.1021/bm050190b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xing Z, Xue Y, Danmark S, Schander K, Ostvold S, Arvidson K, Hellem S, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC, Mustafa K: Effect of endothelial cells on bone regeneration using poly(L-lactide-co-1,5-dioxepan-2-one) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011, 96: 349-357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xing Z, Xue Y, Danmark S, Finne-Wistrand A, Arvidson K, Hellem S, Yang ZQ, Mustafa K: Comparison of short-run cell seeding methods for poly(L-lactide-co-1,5-dioxepan-2-one) scaffold intended for bone tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs. 2011, 34: 432-441. 10.5301/IJAO.2011.8319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Augustin HG, Koh GY, Thurston G, Alitalo K: Control of vascular morphogenesis and homeostasis through the angiopoietin-Tie system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 10: 165-177. 10.1038/nrm2639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saharinen P, Eklund L, Miettinen J, Wirkkala R, Anisimov A, Winderlich M, Nottebaum A, Vestweber D, Deutsch U, Koh GY, Olsen BR, Alitalo K: Angiopoietins assemble distinct Tie2 signalling complexes in endothelial cell-cell and cell-matrix contacts. Nat Cell Biol. 2008, 10: 527-537. 10.1038/ncb1715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kutcher ME, Herman IM: The pericyte: cellular regulator of microvascular blood flow. Microvasc Res. 2009, 77: 235-246. 10.1016/j.mvr.2009.01.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang Y, Kim S, Fahrenholtz M, Khademhosseini A, Yang Y: Osteogenic and angiogenic potentials of monocultured and co-cultured human-bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human-umbilical-vein endothelial cells on three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9: 4906-4915. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinner B, Zaleskas JM, Spector M: Regulation of smooth muscle actin expression and contraction in adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 2002, 278: 72-83. 10.1006/excr.2002.5561.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Au P, Tam J, Fukumura D, Jain RK: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitate engineering of long-lasting functional vasculature. Blood. 2008, 111: 4551-4558. 10.1182/blood-2007-10-118273.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fang JS, Dai C, Kurjiaka DT, Burt JM, Hirschi KK: Connexin45 regulates endothelial-induced mesenchymal cell differentiation toward a mural cell phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013, 33: 362-368. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.255950.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin RZ, Moreno-Luna R, Zhou B, Pu WT, Melero-Martin JM: Equal modulation of endothelial cell function by four distinct tissue-specific mesenchymal stem cells. Angiogenesis. 2012, 15: 443-455. 10.1007/s10456-012-9272-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedersen TO, Blois AL, Xing Z, Xue Y, Sun Y, Finne-Wistrand A, Akslen LA, Lorens JB, Leknes KN, Fristad I, Mustafa K: Endothelial microvascular networks affect gene expression profiles and osteogenic potential of tissue-engineered constructs. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013, 4: 52-10.1186/scrt202.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang B, Yang S, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Xu W, Ye S: Co-culture of mesenchymal stem cells with umbilical vein endothelial cells under hypoxic condition. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2012, 32: 173-180. 10.1007/s11596-012-0031-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geuze RE, Prins HJ, Oner FC, van der Helm YJ, Schuijff LS, Martens AC, Kruyt MC, Alblas J, Dhert WJ: Luciferase labeling for multipotent stromal cell tracking in spinal fusion versus ectopic bone tissue engineering in mice and rats. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010, 16: 3343-3351. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0774.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boukhechba F, Balaguer T, Bouvet-Gerbettaz S, Michiels JF, Bouler JM, Carle GF, Scimeca JC, Rochet N: Fate of bone marrow stromal cells in a syngenic model of bone formation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011, 17: 2267-2278. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samaras SE, Chen B, Koch SR, Sawyer DB, Lim CC, Davidson JM: 26S proteasome regulation of Ankrd1/CARP in adult rat ventricular myocytes and human microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012, 425: 830-835. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.07.162.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsui A, Yokoo H, Negishi Y, Endo-Takahashi Y, Chun NA, Kadouchi I, Suzuki R, Maruyama K, Aramaki Y, Semba K, Kobayashi E, Takahashi M, Murakami T: CXCL17 expression by tumor cells recruits CD11b + Gr1 high F4/80- cells and promotes tumor progression. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e44080-10.1371/journal.pone.0044080.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kode JA, Mukherjee S, Joglekar MV, Hardikar AA: Mesenchymal stem cells: immunobiology and role in immunomodulation and tissue regeneration. Cytotherapy. 2009, 11: 377-391. 10.1080/14653240903080367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abdi R, Fiorina P, Adra CN, Atkinson M, Sayegh MH: Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells: a potential therapeutic strategy for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2008, 57: 1759-1767. 10.2337/db08-0180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beckermann BM, Kallifatidis G, Groth A, Frommhold D, Apel A, Mattern J, Salnikov AV, Moldenhauer G, Wagner W, Diehlmann A, Saffrich R, Schubert M, Ho AD, Giese N, Büchler MW, Friess H, Büchler P, Herr I: VEGF expression by mesenchymal stem cells contributes to angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2008, 99: 622-631. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604508.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.