Intraarterial transplantation of human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells is more efficacious and safer compared with umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells in a rodent stroke model
- Neha Karlupia1, 2, 3Email author,
- Nathan C Manley1, 2,
- Kameshwar Prasad3,
- Richard Schäfer†1 and
- Gary K Steinberg†1, 2Email author
© Karlupia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 1 March 2013
Accepted: 20 March 2014
Published: 1 April 2014
Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide, claims six lives every 60 seconds, and is a leading cause of adult disability across the globe. Tissue plasminogen activator, the only United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug currently available, has a narrow therapeutic time window of less than 5 hours. In the past decade, cells derived from the human umbilical cord (HUC) have emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for stroke; however, the most effective HUC-derived cell population remains unknown.
We compared three cell populations derived from the human umbilical cord: cord blood mononuclear cells (cbMNCs); cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells (cbMSCs), a subpopulation of cbMNCs; and cord matrix MSCs (cmMSCs). We characterized these cells in vitro with flow cytometry and assessed the cells’ in vivo efficacy in a 2-hour transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) rat model of stroke. cbMNCs, cbMSCs, and cmMSCs were each transplanted intraarterially at 24 hours after stroke.
A reduction in neurologic deficit and infarct area was observed in all three cell groups; however, this reduction was significantly enhanced in the cbMNC group compared with the cmMSC group. At 2 weeks after stroke, human nuclei-positive cells were present in the ischemic hemispheres of immunocompetent stroke rats in all three cell groups. Significantly decreased expression of rat brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA was observed in the ischemic hemispheres of all three cell-treated and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) group animals compared with sham animals, although the decrease was least in cbMNC-treated animals. Significantly decreased expression of rat interleukin (IL)-2 mRNA and IL-6 mRNA was seen only in the cbMSC group. Notably, more severe complications (death, eye inflammation) were observed in the cmMSC group compared with the cbMNC and cbMSC groups.
All three tested cell types promoted recovery after stroke, but cbMNCs showed enhanced recovery and fewer complications compared with cmMSCs.
Cells derived from the human umbilical cord (HUC) have been successfully used in the clinic for almost 2 decades [1–4]. Their simple and economic retrieval, enrichment for hematopoietic progenitors, enhanced proliferation rate, expansion potential [5, 6], and low incidence of graft-versus-host disease [7, 8] makes them a promising cell treatment for several disorders. Although their therapeutic benefits were initially thought to be limited to hematopoietic disorders, several recent studies have shown the potential of these HUC-derived cells to enhance regeneration and tissue repair in various pathological disorders, including neurologic diseases [9–11]. HUC-derived cells have already been used clinically for nonhematopoietic degenerative conditions , hereditary ataxia , and disorders such as cerebral palsy  and spinal cord injury , and they are currently being tested for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00593242).
HUC-derived cells have been used in preclinical stroke studies for more than a decade. Alhough most studies have shown significant functional or histo-pathologic recovery, homing, and differentiation of the grafted cells [16–25], some studies reported on lack of migration or neurologic benefits [26–28] or absence of human nuclei-positive cells despite evidence of functional recovery . In a meta-analysis, we assessed the effects of HUC-derived cells in preclinical stroke studies (included studies, 14). We found a significant reduction in infarct volume with an overall effect of Z = 6.54 (P < 0.00001), with a noticeable heterogeneity as well (I2 = 87%). Apart from variation in study design, cell dose, or route of transplantation, a possible source of this heterogeneic outcome could be the varying mix of cell populations present in human umbilical cord blood  and/or biologic differences of the cord matrix/blood-derived cell populations used in these studies. cbMNCs comprise a heterogeneous mix of immature lymphocytes, monocytes [12, 30], hematopoietic , endothelial , and mesenchymal [33–36] stem/progenitor cells. Moreover, studies report on the presence of very small embryonic-like stem cells , embryonic-like cells [38, 39], and neural stem/progenitor cells [40–42] at different lineage commitment stages. It is therefore important to understand whether it is the mixture of cord blood cells or a specific stem cell population that is responsible for ameliorating the harmful effects of stroke and hereby to assess the risks of cell therapy.
In this study, we characterized and compared cbMNCs from HUCs with two entities of HUC-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs): cord blood MSCs (cbMSCs), and cord matrix MSCs (cmMSCs). Whereas cbMSCs are composed of a rare population of multipotent precursors enriched from cbMNCs [35, 43, 44], cmMSCs are derived from the mucoid connective tissue surrounding cord blood vessels, known as Wharton jelly . These three cell populations were transplanted into stroke rats to assess their potential effects on recovery and their ability to home to the host brain after intraarterial transplantation. Additionally, we analyzed the inflammatory response in the host, as well as the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), glutathione peroxidase-4 (GPx-4), and reelin mRNA in the ipsilateral hemispheres of the study animals, given their role in neuroprotection and recovery after stroke [46–56].
Materials and methods
Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model and sham surgery
All animal procedures were approved by the Stanford University Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care. Adult male Wistar rats (270 to 300 g) were subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) by using the 2-hour transient intraluminal filament occlusion model of cerebral ischemia, as described previously [49, 57, 58]. In brief, rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane in a mixture of 30% oxygen and 70% air. After a midline incision, the right common carotid artery (CCA), external carotid artery (ECA), and internal carotid artery (ICA) were exposed. The CCA and ICA were temporarily ligated, and a 4–0 silicone rubber-coated reusable monofilament (Doccol Inc, 40SPRe3756) was inserted into the lumen of the right ICA through a small incision in the ECA. The filament was advanced into the ICA until 18 to 19 mm was inserted from the bifurcation, and the origin of the middle cerebral artery was blocked. Physiological parameters (respiratory rate, core body temperature, and color of mucous membranes) were monitored and recorded throughout the surgical procedure. Two hours after the MCAo, each animal was reanesthetized, and the monofilament was withdrawn to cause reperfusion. All surgery animals were given analgesic treatment with 0.03 mg/kg buprenorphine.
For sham surgery, the ECA was surgically prepared for insertion of the filament, but the 4–0 monofilament was not inserted. The neck incision was closed, and each animal underwent the same postoperative care as the stroke surgery animals.
Isolation of cbMNCs and culture of MSCs
Cord blood collection was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Stem Cell Research Oversight (SCRO) Committee at Stanford University. Informed consent was taken from donor mothers before samples were collected. All six cord-blood samples were processed within 10 hours of collection, and cbMNCs were obtained by using the Ficoll-Paque density gradient method [40, 59, 60]. Cell viability was tested by using the trypan blue exclusion method. The cbMNCs obtained were used for cbMSC culture, flow-cytometry experiments, transplantation, or cryopreservation. cbMSC cultures were established, as previously described , with modifications made in our laboratory. In brief, 60 × 106 cbMNCs were plated per fibronectin-coated six-well plates (Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in proliferation medium comprising MEM-α with glutamax, ribonucleosides, and deoxyribonucleosides (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY 16000–044), 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco FBS), 50 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO D8893), 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (Sigma-Aldrich E9644), 10 ng/ml platelet-derived growth factor (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and 1× penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen 15140–122). Plates were placed in a normoxic humidified incubator with 5% CO2 and growth medium was replaced after 24 hours of plating and every alternate day thereafter.
On appearance of the first colony of adherent cells, cells were harvested by using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution and re-plated in new noncoated culture plates. Passages 5 to 6 were used in all experimental procedures. cmMSCs were obtained commercially from PromoCell (C-12971, Germany) and were expanded by using proliferation medium (C-28010, PromoCell).
Flow cytometry was used to characterize the cultured cbMSCs and to compare them with cbMNCs and cmMSCs. cbMSCs from passages 5 and 6 were assessed for expression of mesenchymal and hematopoietic lineage markers relative to cbMNCs in successive flow-cytometry experiments by using mouse anti-human CD73 (PE), CD90 (FITC), CD166 (PE), CD34 (FITC), CD133 (APC), CD19 (FITC), CD45 (APC-Cy7), HLA-ABC (FITC), and HLA-DR (FITC). cbMSCs were further compared with cmMSCs and cbMNCs simultaneously by using a multicolor flow-cytometry experiment designed for a total of 27 phenotypic markers (see Additional file 1). cbMSCs and cmMSCs used in this experiment were from passage 6, and cbMNCs used were from the same sample from which the cbMSC culture was established. For comparative immunophenotyping, cbMNCs, cbMSCs, and cmMSCs (75,000 cells per experiment) were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% to 1% FBS, and 100-μl aliquots of each were placed in flow-activated cell sorting (FACS) tubes for staining.
Six antibody cocktails (Additional file 1) were used for characterization of the three cell types and were prepared according to their conjugated fluorochromes and their emission ranges. The volume of each antibody used was per manufacturer’s recommendation or as titrated in preliminary experiments. Antibody cocktails were added to each tube and incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes. Stained cells were given three washes at 1,200 rpm for 5 minutes each and then suspended in 500 μl FACS buffer. Simultaneously, compensation controls were prepared for all the markers by using BD-CompBeads (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Flow cytometry was performed on a Becton Dickinson LSR-II (Stanford Shared FACS Facility), and data were analyzed with FlowJo (TreeStar Inc). Gates were set according to the unstained and 7-amino-actinomycin D-stained controls to exclude dead cells for each cell type, and compensation was done by single-color-stained BD-CompBeads. Isotype controls were not used for these experiments, as several past studies pointed to their nonessential [62–64] or potentially misleading results [65, 66].
Transplantation of cbMNCs, cbMSCs, or cmMSCs
Animals were randomly divided into experimental groups: sham surgery (n = 12); MCAo + PBS (n = 27); MCAo rats infused with 10 × 106 cbMNCs (n = 24); 5 × 106 cbMSCs (n = 18); 5 × 106 cmMSCs (n = 23), and 10 × 106 cmMSCs (n = 6). Stroke animals were injected with PBS or cells suspended in PBS 24 hours after stroke through an intracarotid route. To assess the inflammatory reaction after stroke, none of the experimental animals received an immunosuppressant drug.
Assessment of neurologic deficit
The rotarod, grid-walk, and open-field behavior tests were used to assess motor coordination, sensory motor function, and spontaneous activity of study animals before surgery (MCAo/sham), and at 1, 4, 7, and 14 days after surgery. Baseline readings at 24 hours before surgery were the internal controls for each study animal. All behavior experiments were performed between 9 AM and 2 PM.
In the rotarod performance test rats were placed on a motor-driven cylinder and the length of time they remained on it before falling was recorded [16, 67, 68]. Animals were trained 3 days before surgery to remain on the rotating spindle (moving at a constant speed of 8 rpm) for 60 seconds. One day before surgery, the trained animals were given a test trial on an accelerating cylinder (with an increasing speed of 4 to 40 rpm within 5 minutes), and latency to their fall was recorded.
The grid-walk test was modified from the test described by Rogers et al.. Rats were placed on an elevated 30-mm2 grid floor for 1 minute to be acclimated and then placed on the grid floor and recorded for 2 minutes. Total numbers of paired steps as well as total numbers of foot faults for each limb were manually counted from the recorded videos . Percentage foot fault was determined by using the formula: ((Number of foot faults/(number of paired steps + number of foot faults)) × 100).
For the open-field test, animals were individually placed in the center of the arena and were tracked with a video camera connected to a computer. Ethovision XT 5.1 software by Noldus was used to design the paradigm for recording, and animals were recorded for 10 minutes for each trial. Total distance moved by each animal during the 10-minute trial was compared to assess spontaneous activity.
Assessment of infarct size
On day 14 after stroke, rats were killed with isoflurane and perfused transcardially with 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Brains were extracted and incubated overnight in 10-fold 4% PFA and were saturated with increasing sucrose concentrations (20% followed by 30%) in PBS for 24 to 48 hours. Cryosections (20 μm) were cut serially between +1 to -1 bregma. Seven coronal sections (200 μm apart) per brain were stained by using high-contrast silver staining and scanned at 1,200 dpi [69, 70]. Image J software by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was used to measure the total ipsilateral, contralateral, and infarct areas. Infarct area was calculated relative to the contralateral hemisphere by using the formula: infarct size = 100 × (total contralateral hemisphere area - (total ipsilateral hemisphere area–infarct area)/total contralateral hemisphere area) [17, 69].
Tissue processing and immunohistochemistry
At 2 weeks after stroke, animals were transcardially perfused, and brains were extracted and sectioned at 20-μm postfixation. Immunohistochemistry was performed for localization of human nuclei (HuNu)-positive cells in cell-treated animals and to assess the effect of transplanted cells on immune response by using anti-CD68 and ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1 (Iba-1) antibodies.
Immunohistochemistry to localize transplanted human cells was performed  by using a monoclonal antibody specific for human nuclei with no cross-reactivity for rat or mouse nuclei (MAB1281, mouse anti-HuNu, Millipore, Billerica, MA). In brief, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with H2O2 (0.3%), and sections were blocked for 40 minutes in tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% normal goat serum (NGS; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, S-1000). Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody (1:100) and then incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG, Zymed; Vector Laboratories, 1:200) for 2 hours at room temperature followed by ABC (Vectastain Elite; Vector Laboratories) and diaminobenzidine (DAB; Vector Laboratories) developing. Immunohistochemical staining in the contralateral hemisphere was used as an internal control for each animal. Sections from the PBS-group animals were also stained as a negative control for human cells.
A similar procedure was followed with the lysosomal marker CD68 by using mouse monoclonal anti-rat CD68 antibody (sc-59103; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, 1:200).
For Iba-1, immunofluorescence was performed. Primary antibody (rabbit anti-Iba-1; Wako; 1:600) was incubated overnight at 4°C followed by 2 hours of incubation at room temperature with secondary antibody diluted at 1:400 (Alexa Fluor-594 goat anti-rabbit; Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY-A11037) . Mounting was done by using Vectashield mounting media with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, H-1200), and images were taken by using a Zeiss fluorescence microscope.
Total RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated by using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit and following manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, rats were killed at day 14, and the brains were extracted. About 3 mm3 (approximately 30 mg) of tissue was excised from the ischemic hemisphere, 2 to -1.5 bregma, and just medial to the infarcted region of cell-treated and PBS-group animals. A similarly representative brain region was excised from the ipsilateral hemisphere of sham animals. Reverse transcriptase reactions were performed with the Bio-Rad iScript cDNA synthesis kit by using 1 μg of total RNA.
To analyze levels of mRNA, qPCR was performed on the Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time Detection System by using Taqman gene-expression assays (Inventoried/Cat. 4331182; Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reference genes were rat- and human-specific glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Rn01775763_g1; Hs03929097_g1*). Target genes were rat-specific brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Rn02531967_m1); glutathione peroxidase-4 (GPx-4) (Rn00820816_g1); epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Rn00563336_m1); reelin (Rn00589609_m1); interleukin 1beta (IL-1β) (Rn00580432_m1); tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-A) (Rn01525859_g1); rat- and human-specific interleukin (IL)-2 (Rn00587673_m1, Hs00174114_m1); IL-6 (Rn01410330_ml, Hs00985639_m1); and IL-10 (Rn0053409_m1, Hs00961622_m1).
The threshold cycles (Ct) for the target gene and internal control were determined for each sample, which underwent qPCR in parallel duplicate runs. Expression of target genes was normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH and is displayed as 2-ΔCT.
Assessment of adverse effects and mortality rate
Appearance of adverse effects during/within 24 hours and 24 hours after cell administration was recorded. The total of dead animals in each group was counted separately for time points <24 hours and >24 hours after transplantation. The mortality rate was calculated as percentage of animals that died of total animals in each group. Statistical significance for mortality was calculated relative to PBS group.
Statistical analyses of data were performed with GraphPad Prism 5 software (San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc test was used for percentage of infarct area, and two-way ANOVA (with Bonferroni post hoc test) was used for behavioral analysis. The t test with Bonferroni multiple-comparison adjustment was used for qPCR analysis. All neurologic, histopathologic, and gene-analysis data are presented as mean ± SEM. For flow-cytometry data analysis, the two-tailed t test with Welch correction was used, and data are presented as mean ± SD. For mortality data analysis, the Fisher Exact test was used with two-tailed P values. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
Culture of cbMSCs and comparative immunophenotyping of cbMNCs, cbMSCs, and cmMSCs with flow cytometry
Percentage expression of phenotypic cell markers in cbMSCs, cmMSCs, and cbMNCs
Function of marker
Marker for thymocytes and mature T cells
Marker for T-helper cells, regulatory T cells, monocytes
Part of IL-2 receptor present on activated T cells/B cells
T-cell coreceptor and marker for mature T cells
Coreceptor for T-cell receptor and binds specifically to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I
Marker for effector memory T cells, lymphocyte activation, receptor for hyaluronic acid
MHC Class I
Marker for mesenchymal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and fibroblasts
Neuronal cell-adhesion molecule, plays role in synaptic plasticity and neurite outgrowth
IL-10 receptor on T cells/B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and monocytes
Leukocyte common antigen
Monocyte differentiation antigen
Marker for primitive hematopoietic and endothelial stem cells
Prominin-1, specific for hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial progenitors, neuronal and glial stem cells
Stem cell growth-factor receptor, expressed on HSCs, multipotent progenitors, common myeloid progenitors
Lymphocyte differentiation marker
IL-3 receptor on pluripotent progenitors
Marker for NK cells, monocytes, and macrophages
Activated leukocyte cell-adhesion molecule
Lineage cocktail 1 (CD3, 14, 16, 19, 20, 56)
Complement regulatory protein, regulates complement-mediated cell lysis by formation of membrane-attack complex
Vascular cell-adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor-4 specific for stromal-derived factor-1
MHC Class II
Marker for follicular dendritic cells and B cells
Marker for myeloid-lineage cells
Although cmMSCs expressed typical MSC markers, these cells also exhibited expression of certain markers (Lin1+ 31.6% compared with 0.46% for cbMSCs; CD56, 80% compared with 1.28% for cbMSCs; CD4, 68% compared with 5.8% for cbMSCs and CD14, 20% compared with 0.404% in cbMSCs), similar to cbMNCs. CD56, expressed on neuronal and NK cells and known to mediate synaptic plasticity, was found highest in cmMSCs (80.8%) compared with 11.3% in cbMNCs and 1.28% in cbMSCs.
cbMNCs are as effective as cbMSCs or cmMSCs in improving motor coordination
cbMNCs and cbMSCs but not cmMSCs promote improvement in spontaneous activity after stroke
MCAo caused a significant decrease in spontaneous activity of stroke rats compared with the sham group at day 1. Improvement in spontaneous activity, although not significant, was seen at day 4 after stroke in cell-treated animals and at day 7 in PBS-group animals. Despite continuous improvement in the spontaneous activity of cell-treated rats from days 4 to 14, significant recovery relative to the PBS group was seen only at day 14 after stroke in the cbMNC and cbMSC groups but not in the cmMSC group. PBS-treated MCAo rats showed increased spontaneous activity at day 7, which showed a deteriorating trend at day 14. No significant difference was seen across the three cell groups (Figure 2B).
cbMNCs are more effective in reducing sensory-motor deficits than are cbMSCs or cmMSCs
All study animals showed similar limb misplacements in the grid-walking test before stroke, which increased significantly after stroke relative to the sham group. Compared with the PBS group, all cell-treated animals showed a decreasing trend in percentage of foot faults, starting on day 4 (Figure 2C). However, only the cbMNC and cbMSC groups showed significant reductions in limb misplacement at day 14 after stroke (P < 0.001 for cbMNCs and P < 0.01 for cbMSCs) compared with the PBS group. Only the cbMNC group showed significant reduction in foot faults starting on day 7 (P < 0.01) and, by day 14, percentage of foot faults in this group was as low as prestroke baseline values. At day 14, the cbMNC group performed significantly better than the cmMSC group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between cbMSC and cmMSC groups.
A subgroup analysis (n = 8 per group) showed significant recovery in both contralateral forelimb and hindlimb function of cbMNC-treated animals and only contralateral hindlimb function of cbMSC-group animals compared with PBS-group animals (Figure 2D,E). cbMNC-group animals displayed significantly fewer faults in the contralateral forelimb at day 4 (P < 0.01) and at days 7 and 14 (P < 0.05), compared with PBS-group animals, (Figure 2D). Both cbMNC- and cbMSC-group animals had significant reduction in contralateral hindlimb misplacement at day 14 after stroke (P < 0.05 for MNC and P < 0.01 for cbMSC group), relative to PBS group (Figure 2E).
cbMNCs promote greater reduction in infarct size
cbMNCs, cbMSCs, and cmMSCs can survive in the host ischemic environment and mediate similar immunomodulatory effects
Assessment of neuroprotective, antiinflammatory, and antioxidative effects of the three cell types in stroke rats
The lowest expression of rat IL-1beta mRNA was detected in cbMSC-treated animals (P < 0.001), with no significant difference between the sham, PBS, cbMNC, and cmMSC groups. No significant difference was detected in expression of rat TNF-alpha mRNA between groups, although cmMSCs showed a trend of higher TNF-alpha mRNA expression. No expression of rat IL-10 mRNA or human-origin cytokine mRNA (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10) could be detected in any of the study groups.
cbMNCs and cbMSCs showed no adverse effects and decreased mortality after stroke
Adverse effects and mortality after cell transplantation
Cell-related adverse effects after transplantation
% Mortality (number of deaths/total number) after transplantation
< 24 hours
10 × 106
8% (2/24) (Nonsignificant)
10 × 106
3/6 animals developed severe inflammation in ipsilateral eye
100% (6/6) *P < 0.0001
5 × 106
1/23 animals developed severe inflammation in ipsilateral eye
26% (6/23) (Nonsignificant)
5 × 106
11% (2/18) (Nonsignificant)
HUC blood is a promising source of cells for the treatment of stroke, either by using a heterogeneous mix of unprocessed cells or by preselecting a specific cell population from it . Although these two therapeutic avenues have been tested in various preclinical stroke studies with beneficial effects, it is not yet known whether one is more effective than the other. Thus, we compared the cbMNC population, which is a heterogeneous mix of hematopoietic, mesenchymal, and endothelial stem/progenitor cells, along with immature immunological cells , with MSCs derived from cbMNCs and cord matrix.
Although, in principle, transplantation of a xenogenic graft might induce a local immune response in the host, preclinical and clinical reports have raised the possibility of using HUC-derived cells without immunosuppression [12, 17]. Reports have also suggested that immunosuppression is neuroprotective [73, 74]. Therefore, to assess the safety and unbiased efficacy of these cells, we omitted immunosuppression in our study.
Cord-blood-derived cells and other stem cells can be chemotactically attracted to the site of injury . It is thus reasonable to opt for systemic rather than intracerebral delivery to avoid tissue damage at the injection site . Further, selection of intraarterial over intravenous injection was based on study results that showed that more cells reach the MCA territory when transplanted intraarterially [76, 77] and another study that showed approximately 96% of cells transplanted intravenously were trapped in the lungs and did not reach the arterial circulation in a traumatic brain injury model .
As transplanted cell survival in the host brain of immunocompetent rats was one of our outcome measures, we opted to transplant these cells intraarterially.
A dose-response study of cord-blood-derived cells suggested that delivery of 106 cells was sufficient to result in significant functional recovery and that doses of >106 cells resulted in functional as well as histopathologic recovery . We thus opted for a dose of 107 cells to assess the comparative effects of transplanted cbMNCs and cb/cmMSCs. However, we decreased the dose to 5 × 106 for cb/cmMSCs, as intraarterial injection of 107 cmMSCs resulted in severe inflammation of the ipsilateral eye, followed by acute mortality in our study animals. Thus, 5 × 106 cells was the maximum number of cb/cmMSCs we could safely transplant (Table 2). MSCs have a tendency to aggregate into multicellular globules , thus at higher concentrations, they can result in vascular embolization.
Our data suggest that cbMNCs are more effective than cb/cmMSCs in promoting functional recovery and reducing infarct. Although we would have preferred to inject the same doses of cbMNCs and cb/cmMSCs, we think it is unlikely that a twofold difference in transplanted-cell numbers could account for increased beneficial effects of cbMNCs. Furthermore, cbMSCs comprise a very small subset (0.001% to 0.000001%) of cbMNCs . Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that an enriched preselected population of MSCs would have been equally or more effective at a lesser dose, if they were the critical cbMNC subpopulation that mediates recovery. Our flow-cytometry data showed that the cultured fraction of cbMNCs was enriched in CD73+CD166+CD90+CD45-HLA-DR- cells (cbMSCs). These cultured cbMSCs showed an approximately 20-fold increase in expression of MSC markers, resulting in a very effective enrichment of cbMSCs from the cbMNCs. Thus, 5 × 106 transplanted cbMSCs contained 10-fold more cbMSCs than in 10 × 106 cbMNCs. The enhanced recovery in the cbMNC group compared with the enriched cb/cmMSC groups could be due to additional cell fractions in the cbMNCs that might secrete factors important for recovery. Thus, the as-yet-uncharacterized functional properties of cbMNC subpopulations and their possible interactions, rather than total cell numbers, could be responsible for the beneficial effects of transplanted cbMNCs. The enhanced recovery with cbMNCs thus may be partially attributable to the integrative effects of various stem/progenitor cell fractions present in this cell population.
A recent study  compared the effects of cbMNCs with CD34-enriched and CD34-depleted cbMNC fractions in spontaneously hypertensive stroke rats. The study reported superior effects of cbMNCs relative to the CD34+ and CD34- fractions, suggesting the possibility that the combined effect of other cell fractions was necessary for the overall neuroprotective effect.
Although rats in both the cbMNC and cbMSC groups showed improvement in sensory motor functions, only cbMNC-treated rats showed early (within 7 days) recovery in the grid-walk test. This was likely attributable to the significant improvement seen in both contralateral forelimb and hindlimb deficits in this group. Infarct size was also most reduced in the cbMNC group and was significantly smaller than that in the cmMSC group. Although cbMNCs have been shown to produce various growth factors, such as VEGF and BDNF, it is probably their ability to induce enhanced expression of endogenous BDNF that partially resulted in enhanced recovery in this group. BDNF is known to mediate proliferation of existing vascular endothelial cells [83, 84], survival and migration of neuronal cells, along with modulation of their synaptic functions [51, 52], and to exert neuroprotective effects via downregulation of neuronal NOS (nNOS) activity . Intravenous infusion of BDNF has been shown to reduce infarct volume as early as 5 hours after stroke .
Further, the increased mRNA expression of rat-specific BDNF seen in sham versus PBS animals implies a reduction in the BDNF endogenous levels after stroke. Thus, cbMNCs and, to a lesser extent, cb/cmMSCs, possibly restore the stroke-induced depletion of endogenous BDNF. In addition, the trend of increased expression of rat GPx-4 mRNA in cbMNC-treated animals indicates a possible role of MNCs in abating the effects of oxidative stress on GPx-4 levels. The restored GPx-4 might in turn downregulate lipid peroxidation, resulting in decreased neuronal cell death and enhanced overall recovery.
Similar to earlier reports [16, 24], transplanted cbMNCs, cbMSCs, and cmMSCs were seen predominantly in the ischemic hemisphere where homing is likely facilitated by chemokine receptor type-4 (CXCR4)-CXCL12 or CD117-stem cell factor (SCF) interactions. Upregulation of CXCL12/stromal-derived factor 1(SDF-1) has been reported in the ischemic penumbra [87, 88], and its interaction with (CXCR-4)/CD184 (expressed by all three cell populations used in our study) is known to promote migration of cbMNCs . Also, enhanced expression of SCF has been reported in neurons within the injured hemisphere  and might have played a role in directed migration of transplanted cb/cmMSCs, both of which had significant expression of the SCF receptor CD117, as shown in our comparative flow-cytometry experiment.
We observed decreased numbers of CD68- and amoeboidal Iba-1-positive cells in our cell-treated versus PBS animals, indicating a decrease in activated microglia. These resident immune cells are known to acquire a phagocytic phenotype after stroke that disrupts the blood–brain barrier and increases inflammation through release of proinflammatory cytokines, free radicals, and recruitment of leukocytes from the circulatory system [91, 92]. Thus, a decrease in activated microglial cells in the injured brain after HUC-derived cell treatment represents an immunomodulatory effect that could reduce neuroinflammation and increase recovery. Although how HUC-derived cells suppress activated microglia is unknown, a recent study implicates the role of CD11b+ and CD19+ cbMNCs in reducing microglial survival and CD4+ in sustaining microglia in vitro after hypoxic conditions . In our study, cbMNCs were CD19+CD4+, cmMSCs were CD19-, but had enriched CD4+ expression, whereas cbMSCs had negligible expression of both CD19 and CD4. Thus, markedly reduced activated microglial cells in each of these three cell groups indicates that additional factors could be involved in mediating microglial suppression as well as the possibility that CD19+ cells override the protective effects of CD4+ cells.
In stroke, various pro-inflammatory cytokines are secreted from infiltrated leukocytes and macrophages through activation of resident microglia. The insignificant differences in IL-6, IL-β, and TNF-alpha mRNA expression within the cbMNCs and cmMSCs groups compared with control animals may be due to time-dependent expression patterns. These cytokines have been shown to peak in expression in the ischemic hemisphere at day 7 after stroke, which was decreased by day 14 . The significant decrease in IL-2, IL-6, and IL-1beta mRNA in the cbMSC group could indicate a mechanistic shift of action of these cells from their parental cbMNC population. Whereas suppression of proinflammatory factors might mediate the recovery observed in cbMSC-treated animals, in the cbMNC group, recovery is more likely associated with the release of growth factors and the ability to attenuate oxidative stress. The negligible antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 mRNA seen in our study is similar to that of previous reports  in which no expression was seen at day 14 after stroke.
The absence of any human cytokine expression in the ipsilateral hemisphere of the transplanted animals is possibly due to the moderate number of surviving human cells, low levels of cytokine secretion by the transplanted cells, or reduced overall inflammation by day 14 after stroke. Future studies assessing the treatment and time-dependent profile of these cytokines will enhance our understanding of inflammation and the effects of umbilical cord cell subtypes on the same. At 2 weeks after stroke, insignificant differences in the expression of reelin and EGF mRNA between the PBS, sham, and cell groups could indicate that reelin-mediated migration of progenitors and EGF-mediated recovery after stroke is time dependent.
Cell survival in immunocompetent stroke rat brains and the absence of adverse events in cbMNCs and cbMSCs might be due to their immunomodulatory function in addition to the presence of phenotypically and functionally immature T-lymphocytes . Cord blood has a higher percentage of homogeneous regulatory T-lymphocytes (Tregs) compared with heterogeneous Tregs present in peripheral blood and a smaller percentage in bone marrow . Tregs are known to dampen the immune response  and have been shown to exert potent antiinflammatory neuroprotective effects after stroke . HUC blood Tregs have also been shown clinically to prevent allogeneic acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) . It is therefore important to understand the role of this subpopulation in mediating the survival of transplanted HUC-derived cells without adverse effects and whether these cells play a role in poststroke recovery. Although many studies with Treg-depleted donor allografts have shown enhanced GVHD [99–101], it is worth exploring whether Treg-depleted cord-blood-derived cells home and exert similar neuroprotective effects in stroke, as seen in this study. Further, it would be interesting to determine whether cord-blood and matrix cells have phenotypically and functionally similar Treg populations.
Last, although both cbMSCs and cmMSCs showed similar expression of MSC-specific markers, they differed in their expression of Lin1, CD56, CD4, and CD14, which could account for the differences in functional and histopathologic recovery seen with these cells. It would be interesting to determine whether these differences are preserved with cbMSCs and cmMSCs isolated from the same donor. Further, because of phenotypical and functional heterogeneity within MSC preparations and variations between MSC donors, it would be informative to include multiple MSC preparations from multiple donors in MSC studies [102, 103].
We analyzed cbMSCs isolated from a single donor, which is a limitation of our study. Future studies comparing cbMSCs isolated from multiple donors would therefore provide valuable information on donor-dependent and/or MSC-subpopulation variations in the context of cbMSC transplantation after stroke.
Our study data show that cbMNCs, cbMSCs, and cmMSCs are effective in ameliorating the effects of stroke. However, cbMSCs, an enriched cell population of cbMNCs, or cmMSCs, did not show superior performance in stroke rats compared with the heterogeneous cbMNCs. cbMNCs are widely accessible and more easily prepared compared with processed and ex vivo expanded MSCs. Further, the sustainable homing of cbMNCs similar to cb/cmMSCs and the absence of severe cell-related adverse effects, as seen with cmMSCs, suggests cbMNCs to be a promising cell therapy for stroke.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells
common carotid artery
cord matrix MSCs
chemokine receptor type
external carotid artery
fluorescence-activated cell sorting
human umbilical cord
human umbilical cord blood
ionized-calcium-binding adapter molecule
infarct boundary zone
internal carotid artery
middle cerebral artery occlusion
cord blood mononuclear cells
stem cell factor
very small embryonic-like stem cells.
We thank Mary Norton, MD, for provision of patients for cord blood collection; Shilpa P. Chetty, MD, for acquiring patient consent and collecting cord-blood samples; Robert Tibshirani, PhD, for statistical analysis of qPCR data; Guohua Sun, MD, for technical inputs; David Kunis, for laboratory management; Cindy H. Samos, for manuscript editing; and the United States-India Educational Foundation; Fulbright Commission and Institute of International Education, USA.
This work was carried out under Fulbright-Nehru Doctoral and Professional Research Fellowship (IIE Grantee ID:15101860) (NK) and was supported in part by NIH NINDS grant R01 NS058784, Russell and Elizabeth Siegelman, John and Dodie Rosekrans, Bernard Lacroute, Ronni Lacroute, the William Randolph Hearst Foundation, and the Edward G. Hills Fund (GKS).
- Fruchtman SM, Hurlet A, Dracker R, Isola L, Goldman B, Schneider BL, Emre S: The successful treatment of severe aplastic anemia with autologous cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004, 10: 741-742. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.07.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gluckman E, Broxmeyer HA, Auerbach AD, Friedman HS, Douglas GW, Devergie A, Esperou H, Thierry D, Socie G, Lehn P, Cooper S, English D, Kurtzberg J, Bard J, Boyse E: Hematopoietic reconstitution in a patient with Fanconi’s anemia by means of umbilical-cord blood from an HLA-identical sibling. N Engl J Med. 1989, 321: 1174-1178. 10.1056/NEJM198910263211707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Locatelli F, Rocha V, Reed W, Bernaudin F, Ertem M, Grafakos S, Brichard B, Li X, Nagler A, Giorgiani G, Haut PR, Brochstein JA, Nugent DJ, Blatt J, Woodard P, Kurtzberg J, Rubin CM, Miniero R, Lutz P, Raja T, Roberts I, Will AM, Yaniv I, Vermylen C, Tannoia N, Garnier F, Ionescu I, Walters MC, Lubin BH, Gluckman E: Related umbilical cord blood transplantation in patients with thalassemia and sickle cell disease. Blood. 2003, 101: 2137-2143. 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2090.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rocha V, Cornish J, Sievers EL, Filipovich A, Locatelli F, Peters C, Remberger M, Michel G, Arcese W, Dallorso S, Tiedemann K, Busca A, Chan KW, Kato S, Ortega J, Vowels M, Zander A, Souillet G, Oakill A, Woolfrey A, Pay AL, Green A, Garnier F, Ionescu I, Wernet P, Sirchia G, Rubinstein P, Chevret S, Gluckman E: Comparison of outcomes of unrelated bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplants in children with acute leukemia. Blood. 2001, 97: 2962-2971. 10.1182/blood.V97.10.2962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hows JM, Marsh JC, Bradley BA, Luft T, Coutinho L, Testa NG, Dexter TM: Human cord blood: a source of transplantable stem cells?. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1992, 9: 105-108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis ID, Verfaillie CM: Multi-lineage expansion potential of primitive hematopoietic progenitors: superiority of umbilical cord blood compared to mobilized peripheral blood. Exp Hematol. 2000, 28: 1087-1095. 10.1016/S0301-472X(00)00515-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ringden O, Okas M, Uhlin M, Uzunel M, Remberger M, Mattsson J: Unrelated cord blood and mismatched unrelated volunteer donor transplants, two alternatives in patients who lack an HLA-identical donor. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008, 42: 643-648. 10.1038/bmt.2008.239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A, Jacobsen N, Ruutu T, de Lima M, Finke J, Frassoni F, Gluckman E, Acute Leukemia Working Party of European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group; Eurocord-Netcord Registry: Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 2276-2285. 10.1056/NEJMoa041469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris DT: Non-haematological uses of cord blood stem cells. Br J Haematol. 2009, 147: 177-184. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07767.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGuckin C, Forraz N, Baradez MO, Basford C, Dickinson AM, Navran S, Hartgerink JD: Embryonic-like stem cells from umbilical cord blood and potential for neural modeling. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2006, 66: 321-329.Google Scholar
- Rosenkranz K, Meier C: Umbilical cord blood cell transplantation after brain ischemia: from recovery of function to cellular mechanisms. Ann Anat. 2011, 193: 371-379. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.03.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WZ, Zhang Y, Wu F, Min WP, Minev B, Zhang M, Luo XL, Ramos F, Ichim TE, Riordan NH, Hu X: Safety evaluation of allogeneic umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell therapy for degenerative conditions. J Transl Med. 2010, 8: 75-10.1186/1479-5876-8-75.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WZ, Zhang Y, Wu F, Zhang M, Cho SC, Li CZ, Li SH, Shu GJ, Sheng YX, Zhao N, Tang Y, Jiang S, Jiang S, Gandjian M, Ichim TE, Hu X: Human umbilical cord blood-derived mononuclear cell transplantation: case series of 30 subjects with hereditary ataxia. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 65-10.1186/1479-5876-9-65.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramirez F, Steenblock DA, Payne AG, Darnall L: Umbilical cord stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy. Med Hypotheses Res. 2006, 3: 679-686.Google Scholar
- Kang KS, Kim SW, Oh YH, Yu JW, Kim KY, Park HK, Song CH, Han H: A 37-year-old spinal cord-injured female patient, transplanted of multipotent stem cells from human UC blood, with improved sensory perception and mobility, both functionally and morphologically: a case study. Cytotherapy. 2005, 7: 368-373. 10.1080/14653240500238160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boltze J, Kowalski I, Geiger K, Reich D, Gunther A, Buhrle C, Egger D, Kamprad M, Emmrich F: Experimental treatment of stroke in spontaneously hypertensive rats by CD34+ and CD34- cord blood cells. Geriatr Med Sci. 2005, 3: 1-15.Google Scholar
- Chen J, Sanberg PR, Li Y, Wang L, Lu M, Willing AE, Sanchez-Ramos J, Chopp M: Intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood reduces behavioral deficits after stroke in rats. Stroke. 2001, 32: 2682-2688. 10.1161/hs1101.098367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koh SH, Kim KS, Choi MR, Jung KH, Park KS, Chai YG, Roh W, Hwang SJ, Ko HJ, Huh YM, Kim HT, Kim SH: Implantation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells as a neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke in rats. Brain Res. 2008, 1229: 233-248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liao W, Xie J, Zhong J, Liu Y, Du L, Zhou B, Xu J, Liu P, Yang S, Wang J, Han Z, Han ZC: Therapeutic effect of human umbilical cord multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in a rat model of stroke. Transplantation. 2009, 87: 350-359. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318195742e.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim JY, Jeong CH, Jun JA, Kim SM, Ryu CH, Hou Y, Oh W, Chang JW, Jeun SS: Therapeutic effects of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells after intrathecal administration by lumbar puncture in a rat model of cerebral ischemia. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011, 2: 38-10.1186/scrt79.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin YC, Ko TL, Shih YH, Lin MY, Fu TW, Hsiao HS, Hsu JY, Fu YS: Human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells promote recovery after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011, 42: 2045-2053. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.603621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lobel DA, Hadman PR, Sanberg PR, Borlongan CV: Early intracerebral and intra-arterial transplantation of human umbilical cord blood cells into an ischemic rat brain model. Exp Neurol. 2003, 181: 97-Google Scholar
- Taguchi A, Soma T, Tanaka J, Kanda T, Nishimura H, Yosikawa H, Tsukamoto Y, Fujimori Y, Stern DM, Naritomi H, Matsuyama T: Administration of CD34+ cells after stroke enhances neurogenesis via angiogenesis in a mouse model. J Clin Invest. 2004, 114: 330-338. 10.1172/JCI200420622.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vendrame M, Cassadt J, Newcomb J, Butler T, Pennypacker KR, Zigova T, Sanberg PR, Willing AE: Infusion of human umbilical cord blood cells in a rat model of stroke dose dependently rescues behavioral deficits and reduces infarct volume. Stroke. 2004, 35: 2390-2395. 10.1161/01.STR.0000141681.06735.9b.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiao J, Nan Z, Motooka Y, Low W: Transplantation of a novel cell line population of umbilical cord blood stem cells ameliorates neurological deficits associated with ischemic brain injury. Stem Cell Dev. 2005, 14: 722-733. 10.1089/scd.2005.14.722.Google Scholar
- Makinen S, Kekarainen T, Nystedt J, Liimatainen T, Huhtala T, Narvanen A, Laine J, Jolkkonen J: Human umbilcal cord blood cells do not improve sensorimotor or cognitive outcome following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res. 2006, 1123: 207-215. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nystedt J, Makinen S, Laine J, Jolkkonen J: Human cord blood CD34+ cells and behavioral recovery following focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2006, 66: 293-300.Google Scholar
- Zawadzka M, Lukasiuk K, Machaj EK, Pojda Z, Kaminska B: Lack of migration and neurological benefits after infusion of umbilical cord blood cells in ischemic brain injury. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2009, 69: 46-51.Google Scholar
- Borlongan CV, Hadman M, Sanberg CD, Sanberg PR: Central nervous system entry of peripherally injected umbilical cord blood cells is not required for neuroprotection in stroke. Stroke. 2004, 35: 2385-3389. 10.1161/01.STR.0000141680.49960.d7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sorg RV, Andres S, Kogler G, Fischer J, Wernet P: Phenotypic and functional comparison of monocytes from cord blood and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized apheresis products. Exp Hematol. 2001, 29: 1289-1294. 10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00735-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayani H, Lansdorp PM: Biology of human umbilical cord blood-derived hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 1998, 16: 153-165. 10.1002/stem.160153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ingram DA, Mead LE, Tanaka H, Meade V, Fenoglio A, Mortell K, Pollok K, Ferkowicz MJ, Gilley D, Yoder MC: Identification of a novel hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells using human peripheral and umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2004, 104: 2752-2760. 10.1182/blood-2004-04-1396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erices A, Conget P, Minguell JJ: Mesenchymal progenitor cells in human umbilical cord blood. Br J Haematol. 2000, 109: 235-242. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01986.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flynn A, Barry F, O’Brien T: UC blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: an overview. Cytotherapy. 2007, 9: 717-726. 10.1080/14653240701584578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee OK, Kuo TK, Chen WM, Lee KD, Hsieh SL, Chen TH: Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2004, 103: 1669-1675. 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Secco M, Zucconi E, Vieira NM, Fogaca LL, Cerqueira A, Carvalho MD, Jazedje T, Okamoto OK, Muotri AR, Zatz M: Multipotent stem cells from umbilical cord: cord is richer than blood!. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 146-150. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zuba-Surma EK, Klich I, Greco N, Laughlin MJ, Ratajczak J, Ratajczak MZ: Optimization of isolation and further characterization of umbilical-cord-blood-derived very small embryonic/epiblast-like stem cells (VSELs). Eur J Haematol. 2010, 84: 34-46. 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01352.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Habich A, Jurga M, Markiewicz I, Lukomska B, Bany-Laszewicz U, Domanska-Janik K: Early appearance of stem/progenitor cells with neural-like characteristics in human cord blood mononuclear fraction cultured in vitro. Exp Hematol. 2006, 34: 914-925. 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.03.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGuckin CP, Forraz N: Potential for access to embryonic-like cells from human umbilical cord blood. Cell Prolif. 2008, 41: 31-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Domanska-Janik K, Buzanska L, Lukomska B: A novel, neural potential of non-hematopoietic human umbilical cord blood stem cells. Int J Dev Biol. 2008, 52: 237-248. 10.1387/ijdb.072315kd.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Domanska-Janik K, Habich A, Sarnowska A, Janowski M: Neural commitment of cord blood stem cells (HUCB-NSC/NP): therapeutic perspectives. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2006, 66: 279-291.Google Scholar
- Zangiacomi V, Balon N, Maddens S, Tiberghien P, Versaux-Botteri C, Deschaseaux F: Human cord blood-derived hematopoietic and neural-like stem/progenitor cells are attracted by the neurotransmitter GABA. Stem Cells Dev. 2009, 18: 1369-1378. 10.1089/scd.2008.0367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bieback K, Kluter H: Mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord blood. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2007, 2: 310-323. 10.2174/157488807782793763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang JF, Wang LJ, Wu YF, Xiang Y, Xie CG, Jia BB, Harrington J, McNiece IK: Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human umbilical cord blood as support for ex vivo expansion of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells and for chondrogenic differentiation. Haematologica. 2004, 89: 837-844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim DW, Staples M, Shinozuka K, Pantcheva P, Kang SD, Borlongan CV: Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells: phenotypic characterization and optimizing their therapeutic potential for clinical applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2013, 14: 11692-11712. 10.3390/ijms140611692.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arvidsson A, Collin T, Kirik D, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O: Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med. 2002, 8: 963-970. 10.1038/nm747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berger C, Schabitz WR, Wolf M, Mueller H, Sommer C, Schwab S: Hypothermia and brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduce glutamate synergistically in acute stroke. Exp Neurol. 2004, 185: 305-312. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2003.10.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casanova E, Fehsenfeld S, Mantamadiotis T, Lemberger T, Greiner E, Stewart AF, Schutz G: A CamKIIalpha iCre BAC allows brain-specific gene inactivation. Genesis. 2001, 31: 37-42. 10.1002/gene.1078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Courtes S, Vernerey J, Pujadas L, Magalon K, Cremer H, Soriano E, Durbec P, Cayre M: Reelin controls progenitor cell migration in the healthy and pathological adult mouse brain. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e20430-10.1371/journal.pone.0020430.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin K: Reelin and stroke. Reelin Glycoprotein: Structure, Biology, and Roles in Health and Disease. Edited by: Fatemi SH. 2008, New York: Springer, 411-420.Google Scholar
- Ferrer I, Krupinski J, Goutan E, Martí E, Ambrosio S, Arenas E: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces cortical cell death by ischemia after middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Acta Neuropathol. 2001, 101: 229-238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorski JA, Zeiler SR, Tamowski S, Jones KR: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for the maintenance of cortical dendrites. J Neurosci Res. 2003, 23: 6856-6865.Google Scholar
- Seiler A, Schneider M, Forster H, Roth S, Wirth EK, Culmsee C, Plesnila N, Kremmer E, Radmark O, Wurst W, Bornkamm GW, Schweizer U, Conrad M: Glutathione peroxidase 4 senses and translates oxidative stress into 12/15-lipoxygenase dependent- and AIF-mediated cell death. Cell Metab. 2008, 8: 237-248. 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.07.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ursini F, Maiorino M, Valente M, Ferri L, Gregolin C: Purification from pig liver of a protein which protects liposomes and biomembranes from peroxidative degradation and exhibits glutathione peroxidase activity on phosphatidylcholine hydroperoxides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982, 710: 197-211. 10.1016/0005-2760(82)90150-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Cooke MJ, Lapitsky Y, Wylie RG, Sachewsky N, Corbett D, Morshead CM, Shoichet MS: Transport of epidermal growth factor in the stroke-injured brain. J Control Release. 2011, 149: 225-235. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.10.022.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Won SJ, Kim SH, Xie L, Wang Y, Mao XO, Jin K, Greenberg DA: Reelin-deficient mice show impaired neurogenesis and increased stroke size. Exp Neurol. 2006, 198: 250-259. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.12.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R: Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without crainiectomy in rats. Stroke. 1989, 20: 84-91. 10.1161/01.STR.20.1.84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang-Fisher Y, Divani AA, Prado R, Koetzner L: Surgical models of stroke induced by intraluminal filament implantation. Manual of Stroke Models in Rats. Edited by: Wang-Fischer Y. 2008, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 133-158.Google Scholar
- Jaatinen T, Laine J: Isolation of mononuclear cells from human cord blood by Ficoll-Paque density gradient. Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology, Wiley Interscience; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Edited by: Elefanty A, Gregory R, Patient R, Schlaeger T, Snyder E, Yamashita Y. 2007, 2A-1.1–2A.1.4Google Scholar
- Newcomb JD, Willing AE, Sanberg PR: Umbilical cord blood cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, Neural Cell Transplantation. Edited by: Scolding NJ, Gordon D. 2009, Humana Press; Springer Science Publisher, 549: 119-136. 10.1007/978-1-60327-931-4_9.Google Scholar
- Laitinen A, Nystedt J, Laitinen S:The isolation and culture of human umbilical cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cells under low oxygen conditions:mesenchymal stem cell assays and applications. Methods Mol Biol. 2011, 698: 63-73. 10.1007/978-1-60761-999-4_6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alamo AL, Melnick SJ: Clinical application of four and five-color flow cytometry lymphocyte subset immunophenotyping. Cytometry. 2000, 42: 363-370. 10.1002/1097-0320(20001215)42:6<363::AID-CYTO1003>3.0.CO;2-E.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keeney M, Gratama JW, Chin-Yee IH, Sutherland DR: Isotype controls in the analysis of lymphocytes and CD34+ stem and progenitor cells by flow cytometry: time to let go!. Cytometry. 1998, 34: 280-283. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19981215)34:6<280::AID-CYTO6>3.0.CO;2-H.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roederer M, Rosa SD, Gerstein R, Anderson M, Bigos M, Stovel R, Nozaki T, Parks D, Herzenberg L: 8 color, 10-parameter flow cytometry to elucidate complex leukocyte heterogeneity. Cytometry. 1997, 29: 328-339. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19971201)29:4<328::AID-CYTO10>3.0.CO;2-W.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Basford C, Forraz N, McGuckin C: Optimized multiparametric immunophenotyping of umbilical cord blood cells by flow cytometry. Nature Protocols. 2010, 5: 1337-1346. 10.1038/nprot.2010.88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stelzer GT, Marti G, Hurley A, McCoy P, Lovett EJ, Schwartz A: U.S.–Canadian consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematologic neoplasia by flow cytometry: standardization and validation of laboratory procedures. Cytometry. 1997, 30: 214-230. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19971015)30:5<214::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-H.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markgraf CG, Green EJ, Hurwitz BE, Morikawa E, Dietrich WD, McCabe PM, Ginsberg MD, Schneiderman N: Sensorimotor and cognitive consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Brain Res. 1992, 575: 238-246. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90085-N.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rogers DC, Campbell CA, Stretton JL, Mackay KB: Correlation between motor impairement and infarct volume after permanent and transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Stroke. 1997, 28: 2060-2066. 10.1161/01.STR.28.10.2060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arac A, Brownell SE, Rothbard JB, Chen C, Ko RM, Pereira MP, Albers GW, Steinman L, Steinberg GK: Systemic augmentation of alphaB-crystallin provides therapeutic benefit twelve hours post-stroke onset via immune modulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 13287-13292. 10.1073/pnas.1107368108.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogel J, Mobius C, Kuschinsky W, Rosenblum WI: Early delineation of ischemic tissue in rat brain cryosections by high contrast staining. Stroke J Cereb Circ. 1999, 30: 1134-1141. 10.1161/01.STR.30.5.1134.Google Scholar
- Kelly S, Bliss TM, Shah AK, Sun GH, Ma M, Foo WC, Masel J, Yenari MA, Weissman IL, Uchida N, Palmer T, Steinberg GK: Transplanted human fetal neural stem cells survive, migrate, and differentiate in ischemic rat cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 11839-11844. 10.1073/pnas.0404474101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, Krause DS, Deans RJ, Keating A, Prockop DJ, Horwitz EM: Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006, 8: 315-317. 10.1080/14653240600855905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaminska B, Gaweda-Walerych K, Zawadzka M: Molecular mechanisms of neuroprotective action of immunosuppressants: facts and hypotheses. J Cell Mol Med. 2004, 8: 45-58. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00259.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saino O, Taguchi A, Nakagomi T, Nakano-Doi A, Kashiwamura S, Doe N, Nakagomi N, Soma T, Yoshikawa H, Stern DM, Okamura H, Matsuyama T: Immunodeficiency reduces neural stem/progenitor cell apoptosis and enhances neurogenesis in the cerebral cortex after stroke. J Neurosci Res. 2010, 88: 2385-2397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willing AE, Lixian J, Milliken M, Poulos S, Zigova T, Song S, Hart C, Sanchez-Ramos J, Sanberg PR: Intravenous versus intrastriatal cord blood administration in a rodent model of stroke. J Neurosci Res. 2003, 73: 296-307. 10.1002/jnr.10659.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Chen J, Chen XG, Wang L, Gautam SC, Xu YX, Katakowski M, Zhang LJ, Lu M, Janakiraman N, Chopp M: Human marrow stromal cell therapy for stroke in rat: neurotrophins and functional recovery. Neurology. 2002, 59: 514-523. 10.1212/WNL.59.4.514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Chen J, Wang L, Lu M, Chopp M: Treatment of stroke in rat with intracarotid administration of marrow stromal cells. Neurology. 2001, 56: 1666-1672. 10.1212/WNL.56.12.1666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harting MT, Jimenez F, Xue H, Fischer UM, Baumgartner J, Dash PK, Cox CS: Intravenous mesenchymal stem cell therapy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2009, 110: 1189-1197. 10.3171/2008.9.JNS08158.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burstein BL, Shum-Tim D, Chiu RC: Systemic and coronary delivery of marrow stromal cells for cellular cardiomyoplasty: advantages and precautions. Basic Appl Myol. 2003, 13: 7-10.Google Scholar
- Bieback K, Kern S, Kluter H, Eichler H: Critical parameters for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 625-634. 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boltze J, Reich DM, Hau S, Reymann KG, Strassburger M, Lobsien D, Wagner DC, Kamprad M, Stahl T: Assessment of neuroprotective effects of human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell subpopulations in vitro and in vivo. Cell Transplant. 2012, 21: 723-737. 10.3727/096368911X586783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen N, Newcomb J, Garbuzova-Davis S, Davis Sanberg C, Sanberg PR, Willing AE: Human umbilical cord blood cells have trophic effects on young and aging hippocampal neurons in vitro. Aging Dis. 2010, 1: 173-190.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Li Y, Katakowski M, Chen X, Wang L, Lu D, Lu M, Gautam SC, Chopp M: Intravenous bone marrow stromal cell therapy reduces apoptosis and promotes endogenous cell proliferation after stroke in female rat. J Neurosci Res. 2003, 73: 778-786. 10.1002/jnr.10691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shen LH, Li Y, Chen J, Zacharek A, Gao Q, Kapke A, Lu M, Raginski K, Vanguri P, Smith A, Chopp M: Therapeutic benefit of bone marrow stromal cells administered 1 month after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007, 27: 6-13. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma HS, Nyberg F, Westman J, Alm P, Gordh T, Lindholm D: Brain derived neurotrophic factor and insulin like growth factor-1 attenuate upregulation of nitric oxide synthase and cell injury following trauma to the spinal cord: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Amino Acids. 1998, 14: 121-129. 10.1007/BF01345252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Zacharek A, Zhang C, Jiang H, Li Y, Roberts C, Lu M, Kapke A, Chopp M: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase regulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression and neurogenesis after stroke in mice. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 2366-2375. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5071-04.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill WD, Hess DC, Martin-Studdard A, Carothers JJ, Zheng J, Hale D, Maeda M, Fagan SC, Carroll JE, Conway SJ: SDF-1 (CXCL12) is upregulated in the ischemic penumbra following stroke: association with bone marrow cell homing to injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004, 63: 84-96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller JT, Bartley JH, Wimborne HJ, Walker AL, Hess DC, Hill WD, Carroll JE: The neuroblast and angioblast chemotaxic factor SDF-1(CXCL12) expression is briefly up regulated by reactive astrocytes in brain following neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury. BMC Neurosci. 2005, 6: 63-10.1186/1471-2202-6-63.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenkranz K, Kumbruch S, Lebermann K, Marschner K, Jensen A, Dermietzel R, Meier C: The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 contributes to the ‘homing’ of umbilical cord blood cells to a hypoxic-ischemic lesion in the rat brain. J Neurosci Res. 2010, 88: 1223-1233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun L, Lee J, Fine HA: Neuronally expressed stem cell factor induces neural stem cell migration to areas of brain injury. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113: 1364-1374. 10.1172/JCI200420001.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jiang L, Womble T, Saporta S, Chen N, Sanberg CD, Sanberg PR, Willing AE: Human umbilical cord blood cells decrease microglial survival in vitro. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19: 221-228. 10.1089/scd.2009.0170.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreutzberg GW: Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996, 19: 312-318. 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wakabayashi K, Nagai A, Sheikh AM, Shiota Y, Narantuya D, Watanabe T, Masuda J, Kobayashi S, Kim SU, Yamaguchi S: Transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional improvement and increased expression of neurotrophic factors in a rat focal cerebral ischemia model. J Neurosci Res. 2010, 88: 1017-1025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris DT, Schumacher MJ, Locascio J, Besencon FJ, Olson GB, DeLuca D, Shenker L, Bard J, Boyse EA: Phenotypic and functional immaturity of human umbilical cord blood T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 10006-10010. 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10006.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pimentel-Coelho PM, Rosado-de-Castro PH, da Fonseca LM, Mendez-Otero R: Umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell transplantation for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Res. 2012, 71: 464-473. 10.1038/pr.2011.59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang Q, Bluestone JA: The Foxp3+ regulatory T cell: a jack of all trades, master of regulation. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9: 239-244. 10.1038/ni1572.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liesz A, Suri-Payer E, Veltkamp C, Doerr H, Sommer C, Rivest S, Giese T, Veltkamp R: Regulatory T cells are key cerebroprotective immunomodulators in acute experimental stroke. Nat Med. 2009, 15: 192-199. 10.1038/nm.1927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brunstein CG, Miller JS, Cao Q, McKenna DH, Hippen KL, Curtsinger J, Defor T, Levine BL, June CH, Rubinstein P, Rubinstein P, McGlave PB, Blazar BR, Wagner JE: Infusion of ex vivo expanded T regulatory cells in adults transplanted with umbilical cord blood: safety profile and detection kinetics. Blood. 2011, 117: 1061-1070. 10.1182/blood-2010-07-293795.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen JL, Trenado A, Vasey D, Klatzmann D, Salomon BL: CD4(+)CD25(+) immunoregulatory T cells: new therapeutics for graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med. 2002, 196: 401-406. 10.1084/jem.20020090.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor PA, Lees CJ, Blazar BR: The infusion of ex vivo activated and expanded CD4(+)CD25(+) immune regulatory cells inhibits graft-versus-host disease lethality. Blood. 2002, 99: 3493-3499. 10.1182/blood.V99.10.3493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao D, Zhang C, Yi T, Lin CL, Todorov I, Kandeel F, Forman S, Zeng D: In vivo-activated CD103+ CD4+ regulatory T cells ameliorate ongoing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2008, 112: 2129-2138. 10.1182/blood-2008-02-140277.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Kluter H, Bieback K: Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 1294-1301. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siegel G, Kluba T, Hermanutz-Klein U, Bieback K, Northoff H, Schafer R: Phenotype, donor age and gender affect function of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. BMC Med. 2013, 11: 146-10.1186/1741-7015-11-146.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.