Skip to main content

Table 6 The results of D value analysis and multiple comparison of three dose groups

From: Multi-compositional MRI evaluation of repair cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with treatment of allogeneic human adipose-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells

Measurement High Mid Low F value P value
T1rho (ms) 2.73 ± 0.40 1.82 ± 0.40 0.49 ± 0.49 6.31 0.025*
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.004*
High vs mid   0.129
Mid vs low   0.056
T2 (ms) 2.47 ± 1.12 2.95 ± 1.12 4.04 ± 1.11 0.517 0.606
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.337
High vs mid   0.764
Mid vs low   0.502
T2star (ms) 1.66 ± 0.46 1.62 ± 0.46 2.01 ± 0.46 0.222 0.804
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.565
High vs mid   0.951
Mid vs low   0.554
R2star (s−1) − 2.78 ± 1.04 − 2.23 ± 1.04 − 3.36 ± 1.04 0.298 0.747
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.699
High vs mid   0.710
Mid vs low   0.452
ADC (×10−3 mm2/s) 0.16 ± 0.047 0.07 ± 0.047 0.13 ± 0.047 0.956 0.407
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.664
High vs mid   0.195
Mid vs low   0.376
FA − 0.045 ± 0.016 − 0.02 ± 0.01 0.037 ± 0.016 0.627 0.548
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.737
High vs mid   0.291
Mid vs low   0.463
WORMS − 0.167 ± 0.75 0.042 ± 0.77 − 0.67 ± 0.74 1.571 0.240
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.394
High vs mid   0.438
Mid vs low   0.398
CV − 210.25 ± 485.2 − 224.42 ± 485 − 208.38 ± 485.23 0.257 0.777
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.551
High vs mid   0.984
Mid vs low   0.538
WOMAC 14.5 ± 5.5 20.67 ± 5.54 18.67 ± 5.54 0.322 0.729
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.857
High vs mid   0.717
Mid vs low   0.965
SF-36 14.83 ± 14.13 19.17 ± 13.79 19.50 ± 10.97 0.239 0.790
Multiple comparison High vs low   0.812
High vs mid   0.835
Mid vs low   0.999
  1. Values are given as mean ± standard deviation of the mean
  2. *Significantly different between two groups (P < 0.05)