Multi-compositional MRI evaluation of repair cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with treatment of allogeneic human adipose-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells

Table 6 The results of D value analysis and multiple comparison of three dose groups

Measurement	High	Mid	Low	F value	P value
T1rho (ms)	2.73 ± 0.40	1.82 ± 0.40	0.49 ± 0.49	6.31	0.025*
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.004*
			High vs mid		0.129
			Mid vs low		0.056
T2 (ms)	2.47 ± 1.12	2.95 ± 1.12	4.04 ± 1.11	0.517	0.606
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.337
			High vs mid		0.764
			Mid vs low		0.502
T2star (ms)	1.66 ± 0.46	1.62 ± 0.46	2.01 ± 0.46	0.222	0.804
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.565
			High vs mid		0.951
			Mid vs low		0.554
R2star (s⁻¹)	− 2.78 ± 1.04	− 2.23 ± 1.04	− 3.36 ± 1.04	0.298	0.747
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.699
			High vs mid		0.710
			Mid vs low		0.452
ADC (×10⁻³ mm²/s)	0.16 ± 0.047	0.07 ± 0.047	0.13 ± 0.047	0.956	0.407
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.664
			High vs mid		0.195
			Mid vs low		0.376
FA	− 0.045 ± 0.016	− 0.02 ± 0.01	0.037 ± 0.016	0.627	0.548
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.737
			High vs mid		0.291
			Mid vs low		0.463
WORMS	− 0.167 ± 0.75	0.042 ± 0.77	− 0.67 ± 0.74	1.571	0.240
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.394
			High vs mid		0.438
			Mid vs low		0.398
CV	− 210.25 ± 485.2	− 224.42 ± 485	− 208.38 ± 485.23	0.257	0.777
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.551
			High vs mid		0.984
			Mid vs low		0.538
WOMAC	14.5 ± 5.5	20.67 ± 5.54	18.67 ± 5.54	0.322	0.729
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.857
			High vs mid		0.717
			Mid vs low		0.965
SF-36	14.83 ± 14.13	19.17 ± 13.79	19.50 ± 10.97	0.239	0.790
	Multiple comparison		High vs low		0.812
			High vs mid		0.835
			Mid vs low		0.999

ISSN: 1757-6512