Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between cell-based and cell-free approaches for cardiac repair and regeneration

From: Mending a broken heart: current strategies and limitations of cell-based therapy

 

Cell-based therapy

Cell-free therapy

Adult stem cells

Embryonic stem cells

Induced pluripotent stem cells

Growth factors

Modified mRNA

Exosomes

Origin

Accessible in various organs and tissues

Derived from embryos

Derived from adult somatic cells

Cell source dependent

Ethical issues

No

Yes

No

No

Genetics stability

Genetically stable

Genetically unstable

Safety

No evidence for tumorigenesis

Possible tumorigenic risk

Non-tumorigenic

Immunogenicity

Low risk of immune rejection

Possible risk of immune rejection

Possible risk of immune rejection (unless autologous)

Non-immunogenic

Non-immunogenic

Depend on the nature of donor cells

Risk of arrhythmia

Low risk of arrhythmia

Possible risk of arrhythmia

No evidence for risk of arrhythmia

Factors determining therapeutic efficacy

Highly dependent on the state of maturation, cell number, and viability during transplantation

Loading dosage

Protein expression efficiency

Content (biomolecules) in the exosomes

Approach-related limitations

Large number of cells are required for significant therapeutic effect

Short biological half-life and low specificity

May require multiple injections due to transient protein expression

Risk of unknown side effects due to unidentified biomolecules in the exosomes