Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of pretreatment and follow-up CT features

From: Treatment of severe COVID-19 with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

Parameters

Total patients (n = 41)

hUC-MSC (N = 12)

Control (N = 29)

P value

Pretreatment

 CT score

18.00 (15.00, 20.00)

18.50 (16.25, 20.75)

16.00 (15.00, 20.00)

0.1946

 Number of lobes involved

4 (4, 5)

4 (4, 5)

4 (3.5, 5)

0.5826

 GGO

41 (100%)

12 (100%)

29 (100%)

1.0000

 Linear opacities

36 (87.80%)

10 (83.33%)

26 (89.66%)

0.6197

 Consolidation

35 (85.37%)

11 (91.67%)

25 (86.21%)

1.0000

 Interlobular septal thickening

35 (85.37%)

10 (83.33%)

25 (86.21%)

1.0000

 Crazy-paving pattern

22 (53.65%)

7 (58.33%)

15 (51.72%)

0.7437

 Subpleural curvilinear line

16 (39.02%)

6 (50.00%)

10 (34.48%)

0.7300

 Bronchial wall thickening

27 (65.85%)

8 (66.67%)

19 (65.52%)

1.0000

 Lymph node enlargement

20 (48.78%)

5 (41.67%)

15 (51.72%)

0.7337

 Pleural effusion

5 (12.20%)

2 (16.67%)

3 (10.34%)

0.6197

2 weeks after treatment§

 CT score

9.00 (8.00, 10.50)

8.50 (7.25, 9.00)

10.00 (8.50, 12.50)

0.017*

 Number of lobes involved

3 (2, 3)

2 (2, 2)

3 (2, 3)

< 0.001***

 GGO

23 (58.97%)

4 (33.33%)

19 (70.37%)

0.0407*

 Linear opacities

26 (66.67%)

5 (41.67%)

21 (77.78%)

0.0624

 Consolidation

27 (69.23%)

4 (33.33%)

20 (74.07%)

0.0306*

 Interlobular septal thickening

25 (64.10%)

5 (41.67%)

20 (74.07%)

0.0636

 Crazy-paving pattern

16 (41.03%)

3 (25.00%)

13 (48.15%)

0.2913

 Subpleural curvilinear line

12 (30.77%)

3 (25.00%)

9 (33.33%)

0.7190

 Bronchial wall thickening

22 (56.41%)

4 (33.33%)

18 (66.67%)

0.0820

 Lymph node enlargement

16 (41.03%)

3 (25.00%)

13 (48.15%)

0.2913

 Pleural effusion

3 (7.69%)

1 (8.33%)

2 (7.41%)

1.0000

  1. GGO ground-glass opacity
  2. §During 2 weeks of treatment, two patients in the control group did not receive CT examination due to their serious illness, and the statistical number was calculated as 27 cases
  3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with control group