Skip to main content

Table 3 MINORS bias scale

From: The impact of Zn-doped synthetic polymer materials on bone regeneration: a systematic review

Evaluation

[16]

[17]

[26]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[27]

[24]

[28]

[25]

Clearly stated aim

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Contemporary groups

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Prospective collection of data

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Sample randomization

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

2

2

0

Test group: Zn content in the materials: 0 (not reported), 1 (materials coated with Zn or rough mixing ratio of Zn), 2 (precise mixing ratio of Zn)

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

Measurements standardization

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Condition of the samples during measurements

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Measurements method

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Baseline equivalence of groups

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Adequate statistical analyses

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

Total Score

20

19

20

20

19

20

19

19

20

22

22

22

17

  1. Each item is scored 0 (not reported), 1 (inadequately reported), or 2 (sufficiently reported). The global ideal score is 16 for non-comparative studies and 24 for comparative studies