Agent | Detailed information | HSPC mobilization efficacy | References |
---|---|---|---|
1. Cytokines | |||
 SCF | Stem cell factor | Multi-day SCF alone can induce mobilization; IL-11 plus SCF synergistically enhanced mobilization. | Mauch et al. [21] |
 IL-11 | Interleukin-11 | Multi-day IL-11 alone can induce mobilization; IL-11 plus SCF or G-CSF synergistically enhanced mobilization. | |
 MIP-1α | Macrophage inflammatory protein 1α | Single-dose MIP-1α alone induced rapid mobilization; MIP-1α markedly enhanced G-CSF- and AMD3100-induced mobilization. | |
 IL-8 | Interleukin-8 | Single-dose IL-8 alone induced rapid mobilization; the combination of IL-8 with G-CSF or CWHM-823 enhanced mobilization. | Wang et al. [24], Zhang et al. [28], de Kruijf et al. [66], Karpova et al. [107] |
 MIP-2 | Macrophage inflammatory protein-2 | Single-dose MIP-2 alone induced rapid mobilization; MIP-2 markedly enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Wang et al. [24] |
 FLT-3L | Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 ligand | Multi-dose FLT-3L alone can induce mobilization; FLT-3L synergistically enhanced mobilization induced by G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-8, and AMD 3100. | Brasel et al. [22], Sudo et al. [23], Neipp et al. [25], Robinson et al. [33], Robinson et al. [44], de Kruijf et al. [66], He et al. [83] |
 GM-CSF | Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor | GM-CSF alone did not induce significant mobilization; FLT-3L + GM-CSF synergistically enhanced mobilization. | |
 PEG-MGDF | Pegylated megakaryocyte growth and development factor | Multi-day PEG-MGDF alone can induce mobilization; PEG-MGDF synergizes with G-CSF to enhance mobilization. | |
 SD/01a, IM G-CSFa, and PEGLip-G-CSFa | Modified G-CSF | Modified G-CSF exhibited superior mobilization potential compared with standard G-CSF | |
 GROβ and tGROβb | GROβ: CXCL2, a chemokine; tGROβ: truncated form of GROβ (also known as SB-251353, GROβT, GROβ△4) | Single-dose GROβ or tGROβ alone induced rapid mobilization; tGRO-β synergistically enhanced the mobilization effects of G-CSF, AMD3100, and VLA-4 antagonists. | King et al. [37], Pelus et al. [47], Fukuda et al et al. [54], Hoggatt et al. [77], Karpova et al. [107] |
 rhPlGF-1 | Recombinant human placental growth factor-1 | rhPlGF-1 alone had no mobilizing activity; rhPlGF-1 synergized with G-CSF in mobilization. | Carlo-Stella et al. [53] |
 LECT2 | Leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2 | 5-day LECT2 alone induced mobilization; the combination of LECT2 synergistically enhanced AMD3100 — but not G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Lu et al. [91] |
 GROα | The CXCR2 ligand CXCL1 | Single-dose GROα alone induced rapid mobilization, the combination of GROα with CWHM-823 enhanced mobilization. | Karpova et al. [107] |
 IL-33ab | Interleukin-33 | 3-day IL-33 alone mobilized HSPCs more efficiently than G-CSF or AMD3100; IL-33 additively enhanced G-CSF- and AMD 3100-induced mobilization. | Alt et al. [105] |
 CSF1-Fc | CSF1 Fc fusion protein | CSF1-Fc enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Kaur et al. [113] |
2. Agents targeting CXCR4/CXCL12 (SDF1) axis | |||
 2.1 CXCR4 antagonists | |||
  AMD3100 | Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist | Single-dose AMD 3100 alone can induce rapid mobilization; AMD 3100 synergizes with G-CSF to mobilize HSPCs. | Broxmeyer et al. [48]; Abraham et al. [51], Bonig et al. [61] |
  T-140b | 4F-benzoyl-TN14003, a highly selective CXCR4 antagonist | T-140 has superior mobilization potential than AMD 3100; T-140 synergizes with G-CSF to mobilize HSPCs with higher efficacy than G-CSF + AMD 3100. | Abraham et al. [51] |
  TG-0054 | A novel CXCR4 antagonist | Single-dose TG-0054 alone can induce mobilization; TG-0054 showed synergistic effects when combined with G-CSF. | Huang et al. [63] |
  POL5551b | A novel peptidic CXCR4 antagonist | Single-dose POL5551 induced higher levels of mobilization than AMD 3100; POL5551 synergizes with G-CSF and CY in mobilization; continuous infusion of POL5551 for 1–2 weeks achieved higher mobilization than G-CSF. | |
  ALT1188 | A small molecule CXCR4 antagonist | Single-dose ALT1188 alone can induce rapid mobilization; Continuous infusion of ALT1188 for 2 weeks achieved higher mobilization than G-CSF. | Karpova et al. [94] |
  KRH3955 | A chemically distinct CXCR4 antagonist | Single-dose KRH3955 alone induced rapid mobilization; the combination of KRH3955 with AMD 3100 did not enhance mobilization. | Redpath et al. [97] |
  CX0714b | A selective and potent CXCR4 antagonist | CX0714 has greater mobilization ability than AMD 3100; CX0714 synergistically enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization with higher efficacy than G-CSF + AMD3100. | Wu et al. [103] |
  HF51116 | A small molecule antagonist of CXCR4 | The mobilization efficacy of HF51116 was comparable to AMD 3100; HF51116 synergistically enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Fang et al. [112] |
 2.2 Other agents targeting CXCR4/CXCL12 axis | |||
  CTCE-0021 | An SDF-1 analog | Single-dose CTCE-0021 alone can induce rapid mobilization; CTCE-0021 synergizes with G-CSF in mobilization. | Pelus et al. [49] |
  SCA | Sulfated colominic acid, a compound that can modulate CXCR4 function | Single-dose SCA alone can induce rapid mobilization; SCA synergizes with G-CSF in mobilization | Kubonishi et al. [56] |
  ATI-2341 | A pepducin CXCR4 agonist | Single-dose ATI-2341 alone induced mobilization with similar efficacy to AMD3100 | Tchernychev et al. [68] |
  APACs (Neo-r9, Neam-r9) and r9 | Compounds that can compete with CXCL12 binding to CXCR4 | Neo-r9, Neam-r9, and r9 induced robust mobilization similar to AMD3100 when used alone and showed additive effects when combined with AMD3100. | Berchanski et al. [69] |
  NOX-A12 | A mirror-image oligonucleotide inhibitor of CXCL12 | Single-dose NOX-A12 exhibits comparable mobilization effects to that of AMD3100; NOX-A12 synergizes with G-CSF to enhance mobilization. | Vater et al. [80] |
  Me6ab | An alkaloid analog that can disrupt the SDF-1α/CXCR4 interaction | Single-dose Me6 was more effective in mobilization than AMD3100 or G-CSF alone; Me6 synergized with G-CSF in mobilization with higher efficiency than G-CSF + AMD3100. | Zhang et al. [85] |
  LGB321 | A PIM1 kinase inhibitor that can regulate CXCR4 expression | LGB321 enhanced AMD3100-induced mobilization. | Müller et al. [109] |
3. Agents targeting VLA-4 (α4β1)/VCAM-1 axis | |||
 3.1 VLA-4 antagonist | |||
  BIO5192 | A VLA-4 antagonist | Single-dose BIO5192 alone induced mobilization; BIO5192 enhanced mobilization response when combined with G-CSF, AMD3100, or tGro-β. | |
  Thioridazine | An allosteric antagonist of VLA-4 | The mobilizing ability of thioridazine was comparable to AMD3100. | Chigaev et al. [70] |
  BOP | A dual α9β1/α4β1 integrin antagonist | Single-dose BOP alone induced rapid mobilization comparable to that induced by AMD3100; BOP synergizes with G-CSF and AMD3100 in mobilization. | Cao et al. [90] |
  CWHM-823 and -842 | VLA-4 antagonists | Single-dose CWHM-823 or -842 induced mobilization; the combination of CWHM-823 or -842 with tGro-β enhanced mobilization. | Karpova et al. [107] |
  Firategrast | A VLA-4 antagonist | Single-dose firategrast induced mobilization; the combination of firategrast with tGro-β enhanced mobilization. | Karpova et al. [107] |
 3.2 Other agents targeting VLA-4/VCAM-1 axis | |||
  Anti-VCAM-1 Ab | Antibody of VCAM-1 | Anti-VCAM-1 Ab alone can induce mobilization; the combination of Anti-VCAM-1 Ab with G-CSF increased mobilization. | |
  Bortezomib | A proteasome inhibitor that can inhibit transcription and expression of VCAM-1 | Single-dose bortezomib induced significant mobilization; Bortezomib enhanced the mobilization effect of G-CSF and AMD-3100. | Ghobadi et al. [82] |
  Ixazomib | A novel proteasome inhibitor that is speculated to modulate VLA4/VCAM1 axis as bortezomib | Single-dose ixazomib can induce mobilization; ixazomib synergizes with G-CSF but not AMD3100 to enhance mobilization. | Ghobadi et al. [100] |
4. Heparan sulfate | |||
 Fucoidan | A sulfated polysaccharide that can competitively displace SDF-1 from heparan sulfate proteoglycan anchors. | Fucoidan alone induced rapid HSPC mobilization. Fucoidan works synergistically with G-CSF in mobilization. | Frenette et al. [31], Sweeney et al. [34], Sweeney et al. [39], Albanese et al. [60] |
 EP80031 | A heparan sulfate mimetic that can compete with endogenous heparan sulfate. | Single-dose EP80031 alone induced rapid mobilization with efficacy comparable to G-CSF and AMD 3100; EP80031 can act synergistically with G-CSF and AMD 3100 to mobilize HSPCs. | di Giacomo et al. [72] |
 Heparin | A pharmacological competitive inhibitor of heparan sulfate | Heparin alone only induced modest mobilization; heparin plus G-CSF increased the mobilization of long-term reconstituting and efficient self-renewing cells. | Saez et al. [84] |
5. Agents targeting purinergic signaling | |||
 AMP, ATP | Extracellular nucleotides | Combination of AMP with DP induced significant mobilizing effects; ATP enhanced G-CSF- and AMD 3100-induced mobilization | |
 DP | Dipyridamole, a drug inhibiting the cellular uptake of adenosine | DP + AMP induced significant mobilizing effects. | Hofer et al. [41] |
 ARL67156, AMPCP | Inhibitor of cell surface ectonucleotidase CD39 or CD73 | Both ARL67156 and AMPCP can enhance G-CSF- and AMD 3100-induced mobilization | Adamiak et al. [104] |
6. Agents inhibiting Cdc42 activity | |||
 Erlotinib | An EGFR inhibitor that can reduce Cdc42 activity | Erlotinib alone did not induce mobilization; erlotinib enhanced G-CSF-mediated mobilization. | Ryan et al. [67] |
 ML141 | A Cdc42 inhibitor | ML141 alone only induced modest mobilization but played a synergistic effect in G-CSF-mediated mobilization. | Chen et al. [81] |
 CASIN | A Cdc42 activity-specific inhibitor | Single-dose CASIN alone can induce mobilization; CASIN enhanced G-CSF- and AMD 3100-induced mobilization. | Liu et al. [108] |
7. Agents targeting sympathetic nervous system signaling | |||
 Desipramine, reboxetine | Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors | Desipramine alone did not induce mobilization; desipramine and reboxetine enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization but did not affect AMD3100-induced mobilization. | Lucas et al. [74] |
 Adrenaline | Catecholaminergic neurotransmitter | Adrenaline alone did not induce mobilization; adrenaline enhanced the mobilization efficiency of G-CSF. | Chen et al. [75] |
 NE | Norepinephrine, catecholaminergic neurotransmitter | NE alone can induce mobilization; NE enhanced AMD3100-induced mobilization. | Dar et al. [71] |
8. Agents targeting S1P signaling | |||
 SEW2871 | A S1PR1 agonist | SEW2871 alone did not induce mobilization; administration of SEW2871 enhanced AMD3100- but not G-CSF-mediated mobilization. | |
 VPC01091 | A selective S1PR3 antagonist | VPC01091 alone can induce mobilization; VPC01091 enhanced AMD3100-mediated mobilization. | Ogle et al. [96] |
 THI | An inhibitor of sphingosine phosphate lyase | THI enhanced mobilization induced by G-CSF and AMD3100. | Adamiak et al. [93] |
 SLM6031434 | An inhibitor of sphingosine kinase type 2 | SLM6031434 enhanced mobilization induced by G-CSF and AMD3100. | Adamiak et al. [93] |
 Anti-CD69 Ab | An antibody of CD69 that can increase S1PR1 expression | Anti-CD69 Ab induced mobilization of the same magnitude as AMD3100 but did not synergize with AMD3100. | Notario et al. [102] |
9. Other agents | |||
 CY, paclitaxel and docetaxel | Chemotherapeutic agents | Priming with cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, or docetaxel induced mobilization and enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | |
 PGG-glucan | A polysaccharide | Single-dose PGG-glucan alone can induce mobilization; PGG-glucan enhanced G-CSF-mediated mobilization. | |
 ProGP | Progenipoietin-1, an agonist of both the G-CSF and FLT-3 receptors | ProGP-mobilized cells exhibited greater spleen colony-forming activity and competitive repopulating activity than that of G-CSF. | Fleming et al. [35] |
 Defibrotide | A polydeoxyribonucleotide | Defibrotide alone had no mobilizing activity, addition of defibrotide significantly enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Carlo-Stella et al. [38] |
 α-LFA-1, α-Mac-1 | Antibody of β2 integrin LFA-1 or Mac-1 | The antibodies themselves had no mobilizing capacity; α-LFA-1 and α-Mac-1 increased G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Velders et al. [40] |
 Anti-CD49d Ab | Antibody of CD49d | 5-day anti-CD49d Ab alone can induce mobilization; anti-CD49d Ab enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Liu et al. [45] |
 s-kit | A soluble form of c-kit receptor | s-kit alone can induce mobilization; s-kit increased G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Nakamura et al. [46] |
 uPAR84-95 | A derived chemotactic peptide of the cleaved forms of soluble uPAR | 2-day uPAR84-95 exhibited mobilization potency similar to that of 5-day G-CSF; uPAR84-95 did not act synergistically or additively with G-CSF. | Selleri et al. [50] |
 VTP195183 | A RARα specific agonist | VTP195183 alone did not induce mobilization; VTP195183 synergizes with G-CSF to enhance mobilization. | Herbert et al. [55] |
 Anti-Notch2 Ab | Antibody of Notch2 | Single-dose anti-Notch2 Ab enhanced G-CSF- and AMD3100-induced mobilization. | Wang et al. [98] |
 PTH | Parathyroid hormone | 6-day PTH alone can induce mobilization; a combination of PTH and G-CSF showed slight additional effects. | Brunner et al. [57] |
 Tenecteplase, microplasmin | Thrombolytic agents | Tenecteplase and microplasmin enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Tjwa et al. [59] |
 OTR4120, OTR4131 | Glycosaminoglycan mimetics | Single-dose OTR4120 or OTR4131 can induce mobilization as effectively as G-CSF and AMD3100; they synergize with G-CSF or AMD3100 in mobilization. | Albanese et al. [60] |
 Im-HD | Immobilized hyaluronidase | The native hyaluronidase and Im-HD alone did not induce significant mobilization; Im-HD enhanced G-CSF-induced mobilization. | Dygai et al. [76] |
 Meloxicam, indomethacin | NSAIDs | Meloxicam or indomethacin alone can induce mobilization; meloxicam and indomethacin enhanced G-CSF- and AMD 3100-induced mobilization. | Hoggatt et al. [101] |
 AH23848 and L-161,982 | EP4 receptor antagonists | Co-administration of AH23848 or L-161,982 with G-CSF significantly enhanced mobilization. | Hoggatt et al. [101] |
 UDP-G | Uridine diphosphate-glucose | UDP-G showed comparable mobilizing ability to G-CSF; the combination of UDP-G and G-CSF enhanced mobilization. | Kook et al. [79] |
 FG-4497 | A HIF-1α PHD inhibitor | FG-4497 alone did not induce mobilization; FG-4497 synergizes with G-CSF and AMD 3100 to enhance mobilization. | Forristal et al. [86], Nowlan et al. [95], Bisht et al. [106] |
 CasNa | Sodium caseinate | Four-dose CasNa induced significant mobilization. | Santiago-Osorio et al. [87] |
 SnPP | Tin protoporphyrin IX, an inhibitor of HO-1 | SnPP significantly increased G-CSF- and AMD 3100-induced HSPC mobilization. | Wysoczynski et al. [88] |
 HS6101 | A small molecule lipopeptide | Single-dose HS6101 alone can induce mobilization. | Xing et al. [89] |
 Dexamethasone | Glucocorticoid | Dexamethasone enhanced AMD3100-induced mobilization. | Yan et al. [92] |
 Viagra | Sildenafil citrate | Single-dose Viagra did not induce mobilization, but significantly improved AMD3100-induced mobilization. | Smith-Berdan et al. [110] |
 CoPP | Cobalt protoporphyrin IX | 5-day CoPP induced mobilization more efficiently than G-CSF. | Szade et al. [111] |