Fig. 2

Trophic effects of conditioned medium (CM) from DT-DPSCs compared with that from PT-DPSCs. a Migration activity of hPdLF toward the CM with or without G-CSF b Enhanced migration of hPdLF toward CM with or without G-CSF after 24 h was statistically analyzed, G-CSF ^#p = 0.04, DT-DPSCs CM ^#p = 0.03 and PT-DPSCs CM ^#p = 0.04 versus non, G-CSF *p = 0.04 versus PT-DPSCs CM + G-CSF, DT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.02 versus DT-DPSCs CM + G-CSF, DT-DPSCs CM + G-CSF *p = 0.04 versus PT-DPSCs CM + G-CSF, PT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.04 versus PT-DPSCs CM + G-CSF, G-CSF versus DT-DPSCs CM + G-CSF **p < 0.01, ^##p < 0.01 and.^###p < 0.001 versus non. c Enhanced angiogenic activity of HUVECs, showing network formation after 6 h. d Statistical analysis of total tube length. EGM *p = 0.01, PT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.04 and DT-DPSCs CM **p = 0.002 versus Non. DT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.02 versus PT-DPSCs CM. e Enhanced neurite outgrowth of the TGW cell line. f Statistical analysis of neurite length. DT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.02, PT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.01 versus Non and **p = 0.008. g Statistical analysis of neurite numbers. NT-3 *p = 0.02, DT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.03, PT-DPSCs CM *p = 0.04 versus Non h Enhanced effect of CM on the proliferative activity of hPdLF. *p = 0.015, **p < 0.01. i Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay (MMC, treated with mitomycin C) with PBMCs after 24 h. **p < 0.01. All the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)