Skip to main content
Download PDF

Improvement of androgenic alopecia by extracellular vesicles secreted from hyaluronic acid-stimulated induced mesenchymal stem cells

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 15, Article number: 287 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a common form of hair loss. Androgens, such as testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, are the main causes of AGA. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can reduce AGA. However, preparing therapeutic doses of MSCs for clinical use is challenging. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs (iMSCs) are homogenous and easily expandable, enabling scalable production of EVs. Hyaluronic acid (HA) can exert various functions including free radical scavenging, immune regulation, and cell migration. Herein, we examined whether hyaluronic acid (HA) stimulation of iMSCs could produce EVs with enhanced therapeutic outcomes for AGA.

Methods

EVs were collected from iMSCs primed with HA (HA–iMSC–EVs) or without HA (iMSC–EVs). The characteristics of EVs were examined using dynamic light scattering, cryo-transmission electron microscopy, immunoblotting, flow cytometry, and proteomic analysis. In vitro, we compared the potential of EVs in stimulating the survival of hair follicle dermal papilla cells undergoing testosterone-mediated AGA. Additionally, the expression of androgen receptor (AR) and relevant growth factors as well as key proteins of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (β-catenin and phosphorylated GSK3β) was analyzed. Subsequently, AGA was induced in male C57/BL6 mice by testosterone administration, followed by repeated injections of iMSC–EVs, HA–iMSC–EVs, finasteride, or vehicle. Several parameters including hair growth, anagen phase ratio, reactivation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and AR expression was examined using qPCR, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence analysis.

Results

Both types of EVs showed typical characteristics for EVs, such as size distribution, markers, and surface protein expression. In hair follicle dermal papilla cells, the mRNA levels of AR, TGF-β, and IL-6 increased by testosterone was blocked by HA–iMSC–EVs, which also contributed to the augmented expression of trophic genes related to hair regrowth. However, no notable changes were observed in the iMSC–EVs. Re-activation of Wnt/β-catenin was observed in HA–iMSC–EVs but not in iMSC–EVs, as shown by β-catenin stabilization and an increase in phosphorylated GSK3β. Restoration of hair growth was more significant in HA–iMSC–EVs than in iMSC–EVs, and was comparable to that in mice treated with finasteride. Consistently, the decreased anagen ratio induced by testosterone was reversed by HA–iMSC–EVs, but not by iMSC–EVs. An increased expression of hair follicular β-catenin protein, as well as the reduction of AR was observed in the skin tissue of AGA mice receiving HA–iMSC–EVs, but not in those treated with iMSC–EVs.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that HA–iMSC–EVs have potential to improve AGA by regulating growth factors/cytokines and stimulating AR-related Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Background

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a common form of hair loss which is affected by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors, as well as aging [1, 2]. Notably, the hair follicles of patients with AGA has a higher sensitivity to androgens such as dihydrotestosterone (DHT). In hair follicles, testosterone is converted to DHT by 5α-reductase and prolonged exposure to DHT makes hair follicles shrink, eventually leading to hair loss [3]. Several strategies for AGA are available, but only finasteride and minoxidil are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [4]. However, prolonged use of finasteride can cause sexual dysfunction, while minoxidil has side effects such as irritation, swelling, and lightheadedness [5,6,7].

The Wnt/β-catenin pathway plays an essential role in the hair follicle development from dermal papilla cells (DPCs) [8,9,10]. In the presence of Wnt ligands, the phosphorylation of β-catenin by glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) is inhibited, stabilizing β-catenin. Without the Wnt ligand, GSK3β phosphorylates β-catenin leading to the degradation and ubiquitination of β-catenin [11]. In patients with AGA, DHT inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by activating GSK3β, contributing to the inhibition of hair follicular stem cell differentiation in DPCs [12]. Consistently, the inhibition of GSK3β via phosphorylation (at Ser9) by human placental extract caused β-catenin stabilization and promoted the hair-inductive capacity of DPCs [13]. Collectively, activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by blocking GSK3β activity is required to block AGA progression.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are nano-sized particles released from almost all cell types, play an essential role in cell-to-cell communication [14]. In addition, the content of EVs in body fluids can provide biological information about the original tissues, making EVs invaluable tools as non-invasive diagnostic markers [15]. Importantly, stem cell-derived EVs have potential for therapeutic purposes in various diseases due to their immune-modulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and pro-survival roles [14, 16, 17]. The effect of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) on hair growth has been previously reported [18, 19]. Rajendran et al. [18] showed that EVs derived from mouse bone marrow-derived MSCs promote hair regrowth. Additionally, exosomes from human subcutaneous tissue supported the proliferation and migration of DPCs in vitro, and inhibited GSK3β activity via phosphorylation of GSK3β at Ser9, resulting in improved hair regrowth in DHT-induced AGA mice [19].

Despite the potential of MSCs for therapeutic purposes, they are not feasible for industrial or clinical applications, mostly due to limited proliferation in vitro, heterogenicity, and potential immune responses due to their allogenic origin [20]. To overcome these problems, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs (induced MSCs; iMSCs) can be used as an alternative to conventional MSC-based therapies, because iMSCs are homogenous and easily expandable [21,22,23]. In addition, the cellular characteristics of iMSCs are different from those of conventional MSCs and iMSCs may have a better potential for treating immune or inflammatory diseases [24, 25].

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is one of the most widely used biodegradable polymers because of its excellent hydration and lubrication properties. Importantly, HA has diverse physiological functions, including free radical scavenging, immune regulation, and cell migration [26,27,28]. HA has been used for skin tissue repair and wound healing [29, 30]. In this study, we hypothesized that HA stimulation of iMSCs could produce EVs with improved therapeutic outcomes in AGA mice. We report that HA–iMSC–EVs, but not iMSC-EV, reduced AGA by stabilizing β-catenin, inhibited protein expression of androgen receptor, as well as stimulating growth factors/cytokines responsible for hair follicle cycle.

Materials and methods

Isolation of EVs

iMSCs were generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC; STEMCELL Technologies Inc., Vancouver, Canada) as described in our previous study [31]. Briefly, iPSCs were maintained for 2 weeks in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) high glucose supplemented with 15% FBS (ATCC, Manasas, VA, USA) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotics (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the medium was changed every other day. Cells were passaged to gelatin-coated tissue culture vessels (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) using TryPLE Express. The established iMSCs were cultured in high-glucose DMEM (HyClone, Chicago, IL, USA) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. At 90% confluence, cells were detached using TrypLE Express (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and seeded at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2. The next day, the cells were stimulated with or without 40 μg/mL HA (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h. After being washed with Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (HyClone), cells were cultured in phenol red-free DMEM (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 15% EV-depleted FBS. EV-depleted FBS was prepared as previously described [32]. After 3 d of incubation, the culture medium was harvested and HA–iMSC–EVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation, as previously described [33].

Nanoparticle tracking analysis and cryo-transmission microscopy analyses of EVs

Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was carried out using Zetaview®BASIC NTA-Nanoparticle Tracking (Particle Metrix, Inning am Ammersee, Germany) to confirm size distribution and concentration of EVs. The values for the standard controls were set as follows; Sensitivity: 80, Frame Rate: 30, Shutter: 100, Temperature: 23 °C. Cryo-transmission electron microscopy (Cryo-TEM) was performed to confirm the morphology of EVs using a Talos L120C FEI transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described in our previous study [32]. HA–iMSC–EV suspension (4 μL) was placed on a grid and blotted for 90 s at 100% humidity and 4 °C. HA–iMSC–EVs were visualized at 36,000× magnification at 120 kV.

Bioinformatic analysis of HA–iMSC–EVs

EVs (50 μg) were lysed by RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) buffer and the lysates were transferred into 10 kDa filter and centrifuged at 12,000g for 5 min (three times). The proteins in the samples were quantified using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Twenty micrograms of protein was digested in DTT and iodoacetamide and then dried using a SpeedVac concentrator (Hanil Science Medical, Daejeon, Korea). The protein samples were desalted using C18 spin columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific), washed with 0.1% formic acid in LC–MS grade water (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and eluted with 0.1% formic acid in 50% LC–MS grade acetonitrile (Thermo Fisher Scientific). LC–MS/MS was performed using a Vanquish Neo UHPLC System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and tryptic peptides were identified and quantified using a Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The UniProt database was used to identify proteins in the samples. For proteome analysis, protein set sorting of HA–iMSC–EVs and iMSC–EVs was performed with abundance ranks of less than 400 and adjusted p values of less than 0.05. The identification of proteins was performed with 1.0% of false discovery rate. Pathway analyses were performed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (CELLKEY Inc., Seoul, Korea).

Hair follicle dermal papilla cell (HFDPC) culture

The HFDPC were purchased from PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany). HFDPC were cultured in follicle dermal papilla cell media (PromoCell) supplemented with 4% fetal calf serum, 0.4% bovine pituitary extract, 1 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor, 5 μg/mL insulin and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution. The HFDPC were cultured according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The cultured cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator and used within 10 passages.

Western blot analysis

HFDPC lysates were prepared using RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing complete mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablets (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for 30 min and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. For the fractionation of nuclear and cytoplasmic, NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used and the fractionation was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Protein was quantified using a BCA acid assay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were separated by 4–15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) which were used to detect all proteins. The membrane was blocked with Everyblot blocking buffer (Bio-Rad) and incubated overnight with the primary antibody at 4 °C, which was followed by incubating with secondary antibody against immunoglobulin (IgG) at 23–24 °C for 60 min. The primary antibodies against CD63 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), CD81 (Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), Tumor Susceptibility Gene 101 (TSG101, Invitrogen), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Abcam), AR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA), β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA), GSK3β (Cell Signaling Technology), phospho-GSK3β (Cell Signaling Technology), Cyclin D1 (Cell Signaling Technology) and Lamin A/C (Abcam) were used. Information about the antibodies used in western blots are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Secondary antibody-conjugated peroxidase (Abcam) activity was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence. ImageJ 1.54 h software using a ChemiDoc system (Bio-Rad) was used to quantify the immunoblots.

Flow cytometry

iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs were stained using the Human MACSPlex Exosome Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and analyzed using an Attune NxT flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

cDNA synthesis and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from HFDPC using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of purified total RNA using a AccuPower® CycleScript RT PreMix (dT20) (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used for qPCR analysis are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2. qPCR was performed using Power SYBR green PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers, according to the manufacturer’s manual. Real-time PCR was performed on a Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The experiment was repeated three times. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method, and the expression of each gene was normalized to that of GAPDH.

Animals and in vivo experiments

Animal care and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University (#SNU-230116-4-1). Male six-week-old C57BL/6N mice weighing 18–19 g were purchased from Koatech Inc. and housed at 23–24 °C with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle for two weeks. Twenty-five Mice were randomly divided into five groups (five mice per group), including group 1 (vehicle control group) which received a 50% EtOH for topical application and DPBS for subcutaneously injection; group 2 (testosterone-treated group) received 0.5% testosterone propionate topically application for 27 d (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) that was prepared in 50% ethanol; group 3 (positive control) received 0.5% testosterone topical application and was then subcutaneously injected with 1 mg/kg finasteride; and groups 4 and 5 (HA–iMSC–EVs and iMSC–EVs) were treated with 0.5% testosterone, followed by subcutaneous injection with 0.2 mg/kg of HA–iMSC–EVs and iMSC–EVs, respectively. To minimize the variance that can arise from the order of treatments, administration was performed in following order: (1) finasteride (2) iMSC–EVs, (3) HA–iMSC–EVs, and 4) D-PBS. Each injection procedure took one minute. The number of mice per group was determined by the information in previous study [34, 35]. Testosterone was topically applied daily, and finasteride, iMSC–EVs, and HA–iMSC–EVs were subcutaneously injected every other day for 27 d. One day before the experiment, back hair of mice was clipped from the dorsal surface of each mouse with an electric shaver and hair removal cream (Hyundai Pharm, Seoul, Korea) under anesthesia using 2% isoflurane for 5 min. Hair growth was photographed on days 1, 13, 20, and 27. During this study, animals were monitored daily for the criteria for human endpoints: (1) when movement is significantly reduced, (2) situations in which food or water intake is difficult, (3) when body weight has decreased by more than 20%, (4) when the response is significantly reduced, or (5) if the hair becomes markedly rougher. None of the animals were found adversely affected. Data from all animals was included. Oh HK was aware of the group allocation. All procedures for animal experiments were in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines for the reporting of animal experiments.

Immunohistochemistry

The mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation and the dorsal skin was sectioned. Skin tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin to obtain longitudinal sections. The paraffin blocks were cut into 5 μm thick sections. For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, sections were deparaffinized in xylene for 40 min, rehydrated in serially graded ethanol (100%, 95%, and deionized H2O) and then stained with hematoxylin for 13 min, followed by washes for 10 min, and eosin staining for 2 min. They were dehydrated three times for 2 min in serially graded ethanol (95% and 100%). Slides were mounted with xylene. For immunofluorescence histochemistry, the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology) and mouse anti-AR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The secondary antibodies used were goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (Abcam) and goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with cyanine5 (Invitrogen). Information about the antibodies used in immunohistochemistry were listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. Immunofluorescence images were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse Ti2-U fluorescence microscope and analyzed using Nikon imaging software-elements program 5.2 (Nikon, Japan). Immunofluorescence-stained hair follicles were analyzed using individual hair follicles randomly selected from five mice per group (n = 21–26 hair follicles from five mice).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 10 software (GraphPad Prism, Boston, MA, USA). Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean. One-way analysis of variance, followed by post hoc Tukey’s test, was used. Differences with a P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Characterization of HA–iMSC–EVs

To confirm the specifications of the iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs, we measured the size of the EVs using NTA and observed their morphology using Cryo-TEM. The average diameters of iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs were 136.9 and 135.3 nm, respectively (Fig. 1A). The isolated EVs were spherical in shape with a clear membrane, as determined using Cryo-TEM. (Fig. 1A, inset). Both the EV types expressed CD63, CD81, and TSG101 (Fig. 1B). Flow cytometry revealed that iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs tested positive for CD9, CD63, and CD81, which are typical extracellular vesicle surface markers, but negative for stage-specific embryonic antigen-4 (SSEA4) and CD45 (Fig. 1C). These results indicate that HA–iMSC–EVs met the general characteristics of EVs derived from cultured cells [31].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs. A HA–iMSC–EVs were measured the average size is 135.3 nm via NTA. (inset) Representative image of HA–iMSC–EVs observed using Cryo-TEM. Scale bar = 100 nm. B Immunoblotting analysis of HA-iMSCs and HA–iMSC–EVs for markers of extracellular vesicles. Uncropped western blot images are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1. C Flow cytometric analysis of iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs. D Representative heatmap for analysis of differentially expressed proteins of HA–iMSC–EVs by LC–MS/MS analysis. The differentially expressed proteins in HA–iMSC–EVs against those from iMSC–EVs were marked in red and green, respectively. Enriched pathways, p-values, and fold change are shown in Additional file 1: Table S4. Cryo-TEM, Cryo-transmission electron microscopy; EV, extracellular vesicle; HA, hyaluronic acid; iMSC, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell; NTA, nanoparticle tracking analysis

Full size image

Next, we analyzed the proteomic profiles and potential pathways associated with HA–iMSC–EVs. As shown in Fig. 1D, 44 differentially expressed genes were associated with extracellular matrix-receptor interaction (ECM), PI3kinase/AKT signaling, and the proteasome (Additional file 1: Table S4).

HA–iMSC–EVs modulated androgenic alopecia related-mRNA and protein expression in HFDPCs

To establish the appropriate dose of EVs, we compared the effects of iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs on the survival of HFDPCs undergoing testosterone-induced AGA in vitro. The viability of HFDPC was reduced by testosterone, which was reversed by HA–iMSC–EVs (under 25 and 50 μg/mL, Fig. S2). In contrast, no increase in the number of iMSC–EVs was observed. Among three concentrations of HA–iMSC–EVs (10, 25, and 50 μg/mL), we determined to use 25 μg/mL for following cell experiments because this concentration was the minimum level that showed statistical significance (p < 0.05).

A variety of growth factor-related and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways have been implicated in the hair cycling process and in hair follicle regeneration [36, 37]. Thus, we analyzed the mRNA expression of genes that are responsible for hair loss in HDFPC; AR, TGFβ1, IL-6, IGF1, FGF7, and VEGF. As shown in Fig. 2, the expression of AR, TGFβ1, and IL-6, which cause hair loss and converting hair follicles to catagen, were increased by testosterone (Fig. 2A–C). However, this increase was reversed by the HA–iMSC–EVs. The number of cells treated with finasteride or iMSC–EVs only partially decreased. IGF1, FGF7, and VEGF are critical for the maintenance of the anagen phase and stimulation of hair growth. The effect of testosterone on the expression of these growth factors was minimal. In contrast, HA–iMSC–EVs increased the mRNA expression of these growth factors more than two-fold (Fig. 2D–F). Finasteride and iMSC–EVs also partially increased IGF1 and FGF7, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

HA–iMSC–EVs modulated androgenic alopecia related-mRNA expression in HFDPC. A–E The mRNA expression was measured after being treated with 50 μM testosterone and each testing articles including finasteride (100 nM), HA–iMSC–EVs or iMSC–EVs (25 μg/mL each) for 24 h. Cells not treated with testosterone was used as the normal control. Results were from three replicates. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus control. EV, extracellular vesicle; HA, hyaluronic acid; HFDPC, hair follicle dermal papilla cell; iMSC, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell

Full size image

Next, western blotting was performed to observe the change of Wnt/β-catenin signaling molecules as well as proliferation marker proteins in HFDPC. Consistent with the mRNA expression levels, the expression of AR protein was increased by testosterone, which was reversed by HA–iMSC–EVs. No reduction was observed in cells treated with finasteride or iMSC–EVs (Fig. 3B). The phosphorylation of GSK3β at Ser9 residue (phospho-GSK3βSer9) was augmented by finasteride or HA–iMSC–EVs (Fig. 3D), while no change was observed in iMSC-EV-treated cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

HA–iMSC–EVs regulated AR-related Wnt/β-catenin signaling and proliferation in HFDPC. A–E The protein expression was detected with 50 μM testosterone in the presence of 100 nM finasteride, 25 μg/mL HA–iMSC–EVs or 25 μg/mL iMSC–EVs for 24 h in HFDPC. A A typical western blotting result showing that HA–iMSC–EVs reduced AR expression and alleviated testosterone-induced alopecia. B–E The expression of each protein was normalized against that of GAPDH (N = 4). Uncropped western blot images are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S3. F–I Inhibition of anti-AGA effects of HA–iMSC–EVs by rhDKK-1. HDFPCs were treated with 50 μM testosterone in the presence of 5 nM rhDKK-1 or 25 μg/mL HA–iMSC–EVs for 24 h. The expression of AR, β-catenin, and phospho-GSK3βser9 was normalized against that of GAPDH (N = 4). Uncropped western blot images are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S4. The protein bands were measured by the ImageJ software and plotted as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus control group. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 versus testosterone-only group. EV, extracellular vesicle; HA, hyaluronic acid; HFDPC, hair follicle dermal papilla cell; iMSC, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell

Full size image

Consistently, the expression of β-catenin was reduced by testosterone, which was then restored by finasteride or HA–iMSC–EVs (Fig. 3C). Testosterone treatment decreased cyclin D1 expression, which was subsequently restored by HA–iMSC–EVs and iMSC–EVs (Fig. 3E). Figure 3A shows that the decrease of β-catenin from both cytoplasm and nucleus was recovered by either Finasteride or HA–iMSC–EVs. Additionally, the reduction of nuclear translocation of β-catenin by testosterone was reversed by finasteride or HA–iMSC–EVs (Fig. S5A, B). Collectively, HA–iMSC–EVs have potential to repress AR expression and support the growth of HFDPC by reactivating Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

To further verify the role of HA–iMSC–EVs in activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway, a loss of function study was conducted using recombinant human Dickkopf-1 (rhDKK-1), an Wnt antagonist. Indeed, DKK-1 is a pathological mediator that induces hair follicles into the catagen, causing male pattern hair loss [38]. Additionally, DKK-1 has been reported to downregulate phospho-GSK3βSer9 and accelerate β-catenin degradation in several cell types, such as keratinocytes and hippocampal neurons [39, 40]. HA–iMSC–EVs suppressed AR expression, regardless of the presence of rhDKK-1 (Fig. 3B, G). In contrast to the results shown in Fig. 3C, D, however, HA–iMSC–EVs did not affect the expression of β-catenin and phospho-GSK3βser9 upon co-treatment with DKK-1 (Fig. 3H–I). Therefore, AR-related AGA therapeutic effect by HA–iMSC–EVs is dependent of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

HA–iMSC–EVs restored hair regrowth and hair follicle cycles in testosterone-treated C57BL/6N mice in vivo

Next, we compared the potential of HA–iMSC–EVs and iMSC–EVs for hair growth in testosterone-induced AGA mice. Testosterone (0.5%) was topically applied to the shaved skin of C57BL/6N mice once a day, and finasteride or EVs were injected subcutaneously every other day for 27 d (Fig. 4A). The dorsal hair was removed one day before drug treatment, and follow-up images were recorded at weekly intervals starting on day 13 (Fig. 4B) [41]. In normal mice (that received 50% ethanol), hair growth at day 13 was obvious, and became almost complete in all mice on day 20. In contrast, the hair growth was significantly reduced in testosterone-induced AGA mice, showing only 23.0% of hair grew area even on day 27 (Fig. 4B, D). On day 20, hair growth was promoted more in HA–iMSC–EVs than in iMSC–EVs (Fig. 4B). On day 27, the area of hair growth was higher in HA–iMSC–EVs than in iMSC–EVs and was comparable to those that received finasteride during the experimental period (Fig. 4B–D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

HA–iMSC–EVs restored hair regrowth and hair follicle cycles in testosterone-induced AGA mice. A Experimental design. B Images of the change of hair growth. Vehicle control denotes mice received topical application of 50% ethanol followed by repeated SC injection of D-PBS. AGA mice received topical application of testosterone followed by repeated SC injection of designated articles. C, D Quantification of hair regrowth area. ImageJ software was used and the relative area of hair growth against those at D1 was obtained. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 versus testosterone-only group E Body weight change. AGA, androgenetic alopecia; D-PBS, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline; EV, extracellular vesicle; HA, hyaluronic acid; iMSC, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell; SC, subcutaneous

Full size image

To investigate whether HA–iMSC–EVs can improve hair regrowth and induce the anagen phase in AGA mice, dorsal skin from each group were collected at 27 d and subjected to H&E staining. Histological analysis revealed that testosterone treatment reduced the transition of hair follicles into the anagen phase. The anagen ratio was approximately three-fold lower in mice that received testosterone than in normal mice (0.53 vs. 1.55, p < 0.0001). In contrast, finasteride or HA–iMSC–EVs led to an increase of anagen ratio (1.29 and 1.19, respectively). No increase in the anagen phase ratio was observed in mice treated with iMSC–EVs (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Histological investigation of the enhancement of telogen-to-anagen transition by HA–iMSC–EVs or iMSC–EVs. A Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained images of the skin section on day 27. B Anagen:non-anagen (catagen/telogen) ratio in the skin sections. Data was collected from at least 92 hair follicles randomly selected from five mice per group. Progression of the hair follicle cycle on day 27 was quantitatively evaluated. ****p < 0.0001 versus vehicle control group. Scale bars = 250 μm. EV, extracellular vesicle; HA, hyaluronic acid; iMSC, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell

Full size image

Regulation in the expression of AR and β-catenin by HA–iMSC–EVs in testosterone-treated AGA mice

Finally, we conducted immunohistochemical analysis on the expression of AR and β-catenin in the hair follicles of AGA mice (Fig. 6A). In AGA mice, AR-positive puncta and AR intensity was increased, while less β-catenin-positive puncta and β-catenin intensity was detected in AGA mice. In contrast, finasteride and HA–iMSC–EVs reduced the number of AR-positive puncta and AR intensity. Consistently, β-catenin-positive puncta and its intensity was increased by finasteride and HA–iMSC–EVs, while remaining unchanged by iMSC–EVs (Fig. 6B–C). These data indicate that HA–iMSC–EVs have the potential to improve AGA by reducing AR and re-activating β-catenin in AGA skin.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Immunofluorescence detection of androgen receptor (AR) and β-catenin in the hair follicle of AGA mice. A Representative images of AR and β-catenin expression in AGA skin tissues. The outline of the hair follicle is indicated by a dotted line. Red and green colors indicate AR and β-catenin, respectively. Scale bars = 25 μm. B The AR-positive and β-catenin-positive cells were counted in the form of puncta in the hair follicle area. C Quantification of the relative expression of AR and β-catenin in the hair follicle area. B, C The symbols represent the value of all individual hair follicles counted in five mice. Quantified values from each hair follicle are indicated by gray symbols in B and C. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus vehicle control mice. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001 versus testosterone-only group. AGA, androgenetic alopecia

Full size image

Discussion

The canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling is responsible for various physiological processes, such as apoptosis, cell proliferation, differentiation, and tissue homeostasis [42,43,44,45,46,47]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling can cause AGA [48,49,50,51]. Wnt3a-mediated DHT inhibition of proliferating keratinocytes was the first study to emphasize the molecular crosstalk between androgens and Wnt signaling in AGA. Upon AR activation via androgen binding, hair loss is accelerated via a further increase in AR [51, 52], and AR expression was higher in DPCs from AGA males than in DPCs from non-AGA males [53]. Additionally, AR signals activate GSK3β, inhibiting the Wnt pathway by phosphorylating β-catenin and promoting its degradation by proteasomes in DPCs [54, 55]. Thus, it is considered that a balance between the Wnt/β-catenin and AR signaling is important for reducing AGA. Similar to our findings, adipose tissue-derives stem cell (ADSC)-derived exosomes also reduced DHT-induced AGA by inhibiting GSK3β and increasing the expression of key growth factors (VEGF, FGF7, and IGF1); ADSC-derived exosomes restored the proliferation, migration, and hair inducibility of DPCs under DHT-treated condition in vitro and in vivo [19]. However, whether these effects were due to decreased desensitization to androgens (e.g., via reduced AR expression) was not examined.

Increased expression of AR in DPC and prostate cancer cells promotes cellular senescence [52, 56]. In addition, AKT signaling is involved in androgen-AR signaling, promoting DNA damage-mediated early senescence in the DPC of patients with AGA [52]. Proteomic analysis showed that signaling molecules for tissue regrowth (e.g., PI3K/AKT) is enriched in the HA–iMSC–EV proteome signature, and it is possible that multiple molecules (e.g., proteins and microRNAs) may have contributed to the therapeutic outcome. Further studies using mice deficient in these receptors or intermediate signaling molecules are required to better delineate the downstream effects of HA–iMSC–EVs in AGA skin tissue.

EVs from non-MSCs have the potential to treat hair loss. Platelet-rich plasma exosomes improve DPC proliferation and migration of DPCs [57]. Kim et al. [58] also reported that exosomes from bovine colostrum promoted the transition from telogen-to-anagen phase, contributing to hair regrowth to a level comparable to those treated with minoxidil. Additionally, DP spheroid–derived exosomes containing miR-218-5p promoted hair regeneration by upregulating β-catenin signaling through a downregulation of the secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2), a WNT signaling inhibitor [59]. Rajendran et al. [60] also showed that EVs from fibroblasts harboring Wnt3a promoted migration, proliferation, and elongation of the hair shaft in human hair follicles. Macrophage-derived EVs promote hair growth by inducing the expression of VEGF and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) [61]. Given the efficacy of EVs produced by various parental cells in AGA, it is important to systematically compare the differences between EVs from parental cells of various origins. Although these studies have shown that EVs are beneficial for the activation of DPCs and regeneration of hair follicles, preparing large amounts of EVs is challenging, and their effects on androgen-induced AGA are unclear. In the present study, we demonstrated that HA stimulation of iMSCs can produce EVs that have enhanced potential for AGA treatment than those from unstimulated iMSCs. Our data showed that HA–iMSC–EVs reduce AR expression and stimulate Wnt signaling via inactivating GSK3β in DPCs. These bimodal functions of HA–iMSC–EVs may have contributed to an enhanced therapeutic effect comparable to that of finasteride in AGA.

Several drugs have been tested for the treatment of AGA; however, their side effects remain a critical problem. Finasteride is the most commonly prescribed FDA-approved drug for the treatment of AGA. However, this drug has been reported to increase the incidence of sexual dysfunction including impotence, decreased libido, and ejaculation disorders in males [62]. In females, oral or systemic finasteride cannot be used due to the hormonal side effects that cause female pattern hair loss (FPHL), a common form of AGA in female. Accordingly, the FDA defines finasteride as a Category X drug that cannot be prescribed to pregnant women [63,64,65]. Topical finasteride, which has not yet been approved by the FDA, has improved tolerability and can be administered to women; however, its weakness in lowering DHT levels remains [66]. Flutamide, a selective AR antagonist used primarily for prostate cancer, has been tested for the treatment of FPHL in women [67, 68]. Although flutamide was found to be effective in FPHL, it can cause hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal symptoms at high (750 mg/d) and low (below 350 mg/d) doses [67,68,69,70]. Bicalutamide, another selective AR blocker, was also effective in patients with FPHL, with fewer side effects than flutamide in a pilot study [71]. However, an elevation of liver enzyme was observed in 12.5% of patients [68, 71]. Owing to these systemic adverse effects, their use in AGA has been limited. Alternative strategies for AGA have also been tested experimentally. AR-targeting small interfering RNAs markedly reduced AR expression and prevented DHT-mediated changes in C57BL/6 mice [72]. Additionally, AR-targeted self-assembled micelle inhibitory RNA, a novel RNAi with reduced adverse immune responses, was effective in reducing AGA. A study that 48 and 60 patients who were treated with low-dose (0.5 mg/mL, three times/week) and high-dose (5 mg/mL, once a week), respectively, showed meaningful therapeutic outcomes in AGA. However, several side effects including erythema, edema, and local itching were observed in the high-dose group [73].

Although the trophic effect of HA–iMSC–EVs on hair growth has been demonstrated, this study has some limitations. First, the effect of HA–iMSC–EVs on neighboring cell (e.g., immune cells and fibroblasts) production of cytokines and growth factors [74,75,76] remains to be determined. Second, another valuable aspect of hair growth is capillary formation around the dermis; thus, the effect of HA–iMSC–EVs on the growth or apoptosis of dermal endothelial cells is required [77, 78]. Third, the mechanisms underlying downregulation of AR and how GSK3β is reduced remains to be further determined. Nonetheless, the results of this approach provide key information that will assist in the development of a cell-free method for AGA treatment.

Conclusion

In this study, we demonstrated that HA treatment of iMSCs produced EVs with an enhanced ability to reduce AGA. HA–iMSC–EVs enhance the viability of DPC undergoing testosterone-induced cell death. HA–iMSC–EVs promoted the mRNA expression of key growth factors, while blocking the transcription of AR, TGFβ1, and IL-6. In AGA mice, the reduction of hair follicular β-catenin protein level in AGA mice were reversed by HA–iMSC–EVs. Mechanistically, HA–iMSC–EVs reduced AR expression and the GSK3β stability, both of which are important players in AGA. Overall, our data suggest that HA–iMSC–EVs promote anagen transition and re-activate hair growth by regulating the expression of growth factors/cytokines, reducing AR, and activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. To conclude, we demonstrated that HA–iMSC–EVs can reduce AGA progression by suppressing testosterone-induced AR expression and activating Wnt/β-catenin by blocking GSK3β activity (Fig. 7A, B). Thus, our strategy may serve as an alternative treatment option for patients with AGA.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematics of action of HA–iMSC–EVs in DPCs. A Under testosterone (T)-rich condition, AR expression and DHT production increase, promoting GSK3β-dependent β-catenin degradation and increasing the catagen inducers. B HA–iMSC–EVs decrease testosterone-induced AR activation and inhibit GSK3β-dependent β-catenin degradation. Subsequently, the expression of anagenic growth factors is promoted, suppressing and testosterone-induced hair loss. DHT, Dihydrotestosterone; DPC, dermal papilla cell; EV, extracellular vesicle; HA, hyaluronic acid; iMSC, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials can be provided to the corresponding author via email upon request.

Abbreviations

ASC:

Adipose-derived stem cells

AGA:

Androgenetic alopecia

AR:

Androgenic receptor

DPCs:

Dermal papilla cells

DKK-1:

Dickkopf-1

DHT:

Dihydrotestosterone

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

EV:

Extracellular vesicle

FPHL:

Female pattern hair loss

FGF7:

Fibroblast growth factor 7

GSK3β:

Glycogen synthase kinase-3β

HFDPC:

Hair follicle dermal papilla cells

rhDKK-1:

Human recombinant Dickkopf-1

HA-iMSCs:

Hyaluronic acid-stimulated iMSCs

iMSCs:

Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs

IGF-1:

Insulin like growth factor-1

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

MPHL:

Male pattern hair loss

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

SC:

Subcutaneous

TGFβ1:

Transforming growth factor beta1

TSG101:

Tumor Susceptibility Gene 101

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Dawber RP. Aetiology and pathophysiology of hair loss. Dermatologica. 1987;175(Suppl 2):23–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paik JH, Yoon JB, Sim WY, Kim BS, Kim NI. The prevalence and types of androgenetic alopecia in Korean men and women. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145(1):95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufman KD. Androgens and alopecia. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;198(1–2):89–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ntshingila S, Khumalo NP, Engel M, Arowolo AT. An appraisal of laboratory models of androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review. Skin Health Dis. 2021;1(2): e15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Messenger AG, Rundegren J. Minoxidil: mechanisms of action on hair growth. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150(2):186–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glaser RL, Dimitrakakis C, Messenger AG. Improvement in scalp hair growth in androgen-deficient women treated with testosterone: a questionnaire study. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(2):274–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu M, Yu Q, Li Q. Differences in reproductive toxicology between alopecia drugs: an analysis on adverse events among female and male cases. Oncotarget. 2016;7(50):82074–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Andl T, Reddy ST, Gaddapara T, Millar SE. WNT signals are required for the initiation of hair follicle development. Dev Cell. 2002;2(5):643–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Botchkarev VA, Kishimoto J. Molecular control of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during hair follicle cycling. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2003;8(1):46–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito M, Yang Z, Andl T, Cui C, Kim N, Millar SE, Cotsarelis G. Wnt-dependent de novo hair follicle regeneration in adult mouse skin after wounding. Nature. 2007;447(7142):316–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149(6):1192–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulholland DJ, Dedhar S, Coetzee GA, Nelson CC. Interaction of nuclear receptors with the Wnt/beta-catenin/Tcf signaling axis: Wnt you like to know? Endocr Rev. 2005;26(7):898–915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwon TR, Oh CT, Choi EJ, Park HM, Han HJ, Ji HJ, Kim BJ. Human placental extract exerts hair growth-promoting effects through the GSK-3β signaling pathway in human dermal papilla cells. Int J Mol Med. 2015;36(4):1088–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rezaie J, Feghhi M, Etemadi T. A review on exosomes application in clinical trials: perspective, questions, and challenges. Cell Commun Signal. 2022;20(1):145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gangadaran P, Hong CM, Ahn BC. Current perspectives on in vivo noninvasive tracking of extracellular vesicles with molecular imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9158319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lotfy A, AboQuella NM, Wang H. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes in clinical trials. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang K, Cheng K. Stem cell-derived exosome versus stem cell therapy. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023;12:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rajendran RL, Gangadaran P, Bak SS, Oh JM, Kalimuthu S, Lee HW, Baek SH, Zhu L, Sung YK, Jeong SY, Lee SW, Lee J, Ahn BC. Extracellular vesicles derived from MSCs activates dermal papilla cell in vitro and promotes hair follicle conversion from telogen to anagen in mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang X, Cao C, Liang Y, Han L, Tu B, Yu M, Wan M. Adipose-derived stem cell exosomes antagonize the inhibitory effect of dihydrotestosterone on hair follicle growth by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Stem Cells Int. 2023;27(2023):5548112.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang B, Yan L, Wang X, Li E, Murphy K, Vaccaro K, Li Y, Xu RH. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells derived from human pluripotent cells, an unlimited and quality-controllable source for therapeutic applications. Stem Cells. 2019;37(5):572–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiou SH, Ong HKA, Chou SJ, Aldoghachi AF, Loh JK, Verusingam ND, Yang YP, Chien Y. Current trends and promising clinical utility of IPSC-derived MSC (iMSC). Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2023;199:131–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ocansey DKW, Pei B, Yan Y, Qian H, Zhang X, Xu W, Mao F. Improved therapeutics of modified mesenchymal stem cells: an update. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Choudhery MS, Mahmood R, Harris DT, Ahmad FJ. Minimum criteria for defining induced mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Biol Int. 2022;46(6):986–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee HR, Kim S, Shin S, Jeong SY, Lee DW, Lim SU, Kang JY, Son MY, Lee C, Yu KR, Kim M, Oh IH. iPSC-derived MSCs are a distinct entity of MSCs with higher therapeutic potential than their donor-matched parental MSCs. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(1):881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu M, Shaw G, Murphy M, Barry F. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stromal cells are functionally and genetically different from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells. 2019;37(6):754–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang D, Liang J, Noble PW. Hyaluronan as an immune regulator in human diseases. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(1):221–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fakhari A, Berkland C. Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7081–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dicker KT, Gurski LA, Pradhan-Bhatt S, Witt RL, Farach-Carson MC, Jia X. Hyaluronan: a simple polysaccharide with diverse biological functions. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(4):1558–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li J, Guan S, Su J, Liang J, Cui L, Zhang K. The development of hyaluronic acids used for skin tissue regeneration. Curr Drug Deliv. 2021;18(7):836–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sionkowska A, Gadomska M, Musiał K, Piątek J. Hyaluronic acid as a component of natural polymer blends for biomedical applications: a review. Molecules. 2020;25(18):4035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim S, Lee SK, Kim H, Kim TM. Exosomes secreted from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells accelerate skin cell proliferation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cosenza S, Toupet K, Maumus M, Luz-Crawford P, Blanc-Brude O, Jorgensen C, Noël D. Mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes are more immunosuppressive than microparticles in inflammatory arthritis. Theranostics. 2018;8(5):1399–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim J, Lee SK, Jeong SY, Cho HJ, Park J, Kim TM, Kim S. Cargo proteins in extracellular vesicles: potential for novel therapeutics in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamamoto M, Haruna T, Yasui K, Takahashi H, Iduhara M, Takaki S, Deguchi M, Arimura A. A novel atopic dermatitis model induced by topical application with dermatophagoides farinae extract in NC/Nga mice. Allergol Int. 2007;56(2):139–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim HJ, Kim YJ, Kang MJ, Seo JH, Kim HY, Jeong SK, Lee SH, Kim JM, Hong SJ. A novel mouse model of atopic dermatitis with epicutaneous allergen sensitization and the effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Exp Dermatol. 2012;21(9):672–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Choi BY. Targeting Wnt/β-catenin pathway for developing therapies for hair loss. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):4915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shin DW. The molecular mechanism of natural products activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway for improving hair loss. Life (Basel). 2022;12(11):1856.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kwack MH, Kim MK, Kim JC, Sung YK. Dickkopf 1 promotes regression of hair follicles. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(6):1554–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamaguchi Y, Passeron T, Hoashi T, Watabe H, Rouzaud F, Yasumoto K, Hara T, Tohyama C, Katayama I, Miki T, Hearing VJ. Dickkopf 1 (DKK1) regulates skin pigmentation and thickness by affecting Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in keratinocytes. FASEB J. 2008;22(4):1009–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Salcedo-Tello P, Hernández-Ortega K, Arias C. Susceptibility to GSK3β-induced tau phosphorylation differs between the young and aged hippocampus after Wnt signaling inhibition. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;39(4):775–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sato N, Leopold PL, Crystal RG. Induction of the hair growth phase in postnatal mice by localized transient expression of Sonic hedgehog. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(7):855–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sferrazza G, Corti M, Brusotti G, Pierimarchi P, Temporini C, Serafino A, Calleri E. Nature-derived compounds modulating Wnt/ β -catenin pathway: a preventive and therapeutic opportunity in neoplastic diseases. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(10):1814–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang Y, Wang X. Targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bao J, Yang Y, Xia M, Sun W, Chen L. Wnt signaling: an attractive target for periodontitis treatment. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;133: 110935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Krishnamurthy N, Kurzrock R. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;62:50–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang C, Ye Z, Wan J, Liang J, Liu M, Xu X, Li L. Secreted frizzled-related protein 2 is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer. Dis Markers. 2019;3(2019):6149381.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhu G, Song J, Chen W, Yuan D, Wang W, Chen X, Liu H, Su H, Zhu J. Expression and role of dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) in tumors: from the cells to the patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;25(13):659–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tosti A, Zaiac MN, Canazza A, Sanchis-Gomar F, Pareja-Galeano H, Alis R, Lucia A, Emanuele E. Topical application of the Wnt/β-catenin activator methyl vanillate increases hair count and hair mass index in women with androgenetic alopecia. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(4):469–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Y, Xu J, Jing J, Wu X, Lv Z. Serum levels of androgen-associated hormones are correlated with curative effect in androgenic alopecia in young men. Med Sci Monit. 2018;30(24):7770–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen X, Liu B, Li Y, Han L, Tang X, Deng W, Lai W, Wan M. Dihydrotestosterone regulates hair growth through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in C57BL/6 mice and in vitro organ culture. Front Pharmacol. 2020;23(10):1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fu D, Huang J, Li K, Chen Y, He Y, Sun Y, Guo Y, Du L, Qu Q, Miao Y, Hu Z. Dihydrotestosterone-induced hair regrowth inhibition by activating androgen receptor in C57BL6 mice simulates androgenetic alopecia. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137: 111247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang YC, Fu HC, Wu CY, Wei KT, Huang KE, Kang HY. Androgen receptor accelerates premature senescence of human dermal papilla cells in association with DNA damage. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11): e79434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kitagawa T, Matsuda K, Inui S, Takenaka H, Katoh N, Itami S, Kishimoto S, Kawata M. Keratinocyte growth inhibition through the modification of Wnt signaling by androgen in balding dermal papilla cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(4):1288–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Leirós GJ, Attorresi AI, Balañá ME. Hair follicle stem cell differentiation is inhibited through cross-talk between Wnt/β-catenin and androgen signalling in dermal papilla cells from patients with androgenetic alopecia. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(5):1035–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Li VS, Ng SS, Boersema PJ, Low TY, Karthaus WR, Gerlach JP, Mohammed S, Heck AJ, Maurice MM, Mahmoudi T, Clevers H. Wnt signaling through inhibition of β-catenin degradation in an intact Axin1 complex. Cell. 2012;149(6):1245–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mirzakhani K, Kallenbach J, Rasa SMM, Ribaudo F, Ungelenk M, Ehsani M, Gong W, Gassler N, Leeder M, Grimm MO, Neri F, Baniahmad A. The androgen receptor-lncRNASAT1-AKT-p15 axis mediates androgen-induced cellular senescence in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 2022;41(7):943–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nilforoushzadeh MA, Aghdami N, Taghiabadi E. Effects of adipose-derived stem cells and platelet-rich plasma exosomes on the inductivity of hair dermal papilla cells. Cell J. 2021;23(5):576–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kim H, Jang Y, Kim EH, Jang H, Cho H, Han G, Song HK, Kim SH, Yang Y. Potential of colostrum-derived exosomes for promoting hair regeneration through the transition from telogen to anagen phase. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10(10): 815205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hu S, Li Z, Lutz H, Huang K, Su T, Cores J, Dinh PC, Cheng K. Dermal exosomes containing miR-218–5p promote hair regeneration by regulating β-catenin signaling. Sci Adv. 2020;6(30):eaba1685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Rajendran RL, Gangadaran P, Kwack MH, Oh JM, Hong CM, Sung YK, Lee J, Ahn BC. Human fibroblast-derived extracellular vesicles promote hair growth in cultured human hair follicles. FEBS Lett. 2021;595(7):942–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rajendran RL, Gangadaran P, Seo CH, Kwack MH, Oh JM, Lee HW, Gopal A, Sung YK, Jeong SY, Lee SW, Lee J, Ahn BC. Macrophage-derived extracellular vesicle promotes hair growth. Cells. 2020;9(4):856.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Irwig MS, Kolukula S. Persistent sexual side effects of finasteride for male pattern hair loss. J Sex Med. 2011;8(6):1747–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lee SW, Juhasz M, Mobasher P, Ekelem C, Mesinkovska NA. A systematic review of topical finasteride in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men and women. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(4):457–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Oliveira-Soares R, André MC, Peres-Correia M. Adverse effects with finasteride 5 mg/day for patterned hair loss in premenopausal women. Int J Trichol. 2018;10(1):48–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. U.S. Food & Drug Administration: Drug Databases. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/020788s018lbl.pdf. Accessed 07 July 2017.

  66. Gupta AK, Talukder M. Topical finasteride for male and female pattern hair loss: Is it a safe and effective alternative? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(5):1841–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shaw JC. Antiandrogen therapy in dermatology. Int J Dermatol. 1996;35(11):770–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Devjani S, Ezemma O, Kelley KJ, Stratton E, Senna M. Androgenetic alopecia: therapy update. Drugs. 2023;83(8):701–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Carmina E, Lobo RA. Treatment of hyperandrogenic alopecia in women. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(1):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Paradisi R, Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R, Battaglia C, Venturoli S. Prospective cohort study on the effects and tolerability of flutamide in patients with female pattern hair loss. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(4):469–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fernandez-Nieto D, Saceda-Corralo D, Rodrigues-Barata R, Hermosa-Gelbard A, Moreno-Arrones O, Jimenez-Cauhe J, Ortega-Quijano D, Vano-Galvan S. Oral bicalutamide for female pattern hair loss: a pilot study. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(6): e13096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Moon IJ, Yoon HK, Kim D, Choi ME, Han SH, Park JH, Hong SW, Cho H, Lee DK, Won CH. Efficacy of asymmetric siRNA targeting androgen receptors for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Mol Pharm. 2023;20(1):128–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yun SI, Lee SK, Goh EA, Kwon OS, Choi W, Kim J, Lee MS, Choi SJ, Lim SS, Moon TK, Kim SH, Kyong K, Nam G, Park HO. Weekly treatment with SAMiRNA targeting the androgen receptor ameliorates androgenetic alopecia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Rahmani W, Sinha S, Biernaskie J. Immune modulation of hair follicle regeneration. NPJ Regen Med. 2020;11(5):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen CL, Huang WY, Wang EHC, Tai KY, Lin SJ. Functional complexity of hair follicle stem cell niche and therapeutic targeting of niche dysfunction for hair regeneration. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Xu W, Wan S, Xie B, Song X. Novel potential therapeutic targets of alopecia areata. Front Immunol. 2023;19(14):1148359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mammoto A, Ingber DE. Cytoskeletal control of growth and cell fate switching. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21(6):864–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lawlor KT, Kaur P. Dermal contributions to human interfollicular epidermal architecture and self-renewal. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(12):28098–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Designed Animal Research Center (DARC), Institute of Green Bioscience and Technology, Seoul National University, for their support in animal care.

Funding

The research was supported with the research and development budget of Brexogen Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. R&D Center, Brexogen Inc., 3F, 9, Beobwon-ro 8-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05855, Republic of Korea

    Hyun Geun Oh, Minyoung Jung, Seon-Yeong Jeong, Jimin Kim, Sang‑Deok Han, Seulki Lee, Yejin Lee, Haedeun You, Somi Park, Eun A. Kim & Soo Kim

  2. Institute of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1447 Pyeongchang Daero, Pyeongchang, Gangwon-do, 25354, Republic of Korea

    Hongduk Kim & Tae Min Kim

  3. Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang, Gangwon-do, 25354, Republic of Korea

    Tae Min Kim

Authors
  1. Hyun Geun Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minyoung Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seon-Yeong Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jimin Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sang‑Deok Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hongduk Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Seulki Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yejin Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haedeun You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Somi Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eun A. Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tae Min Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Soo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HG Oh, S Kim, and TM Kim designed the experiments. HG Oh, M Jung, SY Jeong, J Kim, SD Han, H Kim, H You and EA Kim performed the experiments. S Lee, Y Lee and S Park isolated and prepared the iMSC–EVs and HA–iMSC–EVs. HG Oh, SY Jeong and J Kim contributed to data analysis and interpretation. HG Oh assembled the data and created the schematic and graphics. The manuscript was initially drafted by HG Oh. TM Kim and S Kim supervised the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tae Min Kim or Soo Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All authors performed experiments and analyses involving human materials and data in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics statement of the human cells used in the study follows the policy of each supplier. We confirmed the ethical statements for the use of iPSCs in the website (https://www.stemcell.com/). Also, ethical approval and the informed consent by the donors for the collection of HFDPCs was confirmed in ‘Certificate of Analysis’ provided by PromoCell Inc. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Seoul National University (Approval date: 16th March 2023; Approval Number: SNU-230116-4-1; Project title: Therapeutic assessment of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for atopic dermatitis).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, H.G., Jung, M., Jeong, SY. et al. Improvement of androgenic alopecia by extracellular vesicles secreted from hyaluronic acid-stimulated induced mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 15, 287 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03906-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03906-x

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512