Table 7 The results of node-splitting method for conversion to THA
Comparison | Conversion to THA | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
CD vs. ABG | Direct | 2.0 (0.37, 11) | 0.75 |
Indirect | 1.1 (0.04, 41) | ||
FVBG vs. ABG | Direct | 0.4 (0.09, 1.7) | 0.74 |
Indirect | 0.8 (0.01, 13) | ||
MSCs vs. BMAC | Direct | 0.3 (0.04, 2) | 0.90 |
Indirect | 0.3 (0.01, 3.4) | ||
CD vs. BMAC | Direct | 2.4 (1.1, 5.1) | 0.88 |
Indirect | 3.0 (0.12, 17) | ||
CD vs. MSCs | Direct | 9.1 (0.77, 35) | 0.90 |
Indirect | 7.1 (1, 64) | ||
FVBG vs CD | Direct | 0.4 (0.01, 7.1) | 0.73 |
Indirect | 0.2 (0.02, 1.9) | ||