Evaluation of the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells derived conditioned medium in the treatment of striae distensae: a double blind randomized clinical trial

Table 2 Comparing the average of biometric factors between two groups

Index	Mean ± SD	p	F	Partial Eta squared
Cutometer R2
Microneedling + conditioned medium	0.83 ± 0.09	0.97	0.001	0.001
Microneedling + normal saline	0.83 ± 0.09	0.97	0.001	0.001
Cutometer R5
Microneedling + conditioned medium	0.97 ± 0.22	0.67	0.17	0.02
Microneedling + normal saline	1.01 ± 0.25	0.67	0.17	0.02
Cutometer R7
Microneedling + conditioned medium	0.61 ± 0.14	0.67	0.17	0.02
Microneedling + normal saline	0.58 ± 0.14	0.67	0.17	0.02
Complete thickness
Microneedling + conditioned medium	1099.90 ± 167.59	0.06	3.94	0.18
Microneedling + normal saline	989.00 ± 131.70	0.06	3.94	0.18
Epidermal thickness
Microneedling + conditioned medium	94.80 ± 8.51	0.68	0.17	0.02
Microneedling + normal saline	97.90 ± 14.21	0.68	0.17	0.02
Dermal thickness
Microneedling + conditioned medium	1005.10 ± 162.85	0.05	4.24	0.20
Microneedling + normal saline	891.10 ± 121.52	0.05	4.24	0.20
Complete density
Microneedling + conditioned medium	22.95 ± 4.78	0.16	2.11	0.12
Microneedling + normal saline	23.23 ± 4.96	0.16	2.11	0.12
Epidermal density
Microneedling + conditioned medium	51.17 ± 4.55	0.35	0.92	0.06
Microneedling + normal saline	50.69 ± 3.74	0.35	0.92	0.06
Dermal density
Microneedling + conditioned medium	20.21 ± 4.99	0.13	2.46	0.13
Microneedling + normal saline	20.16 ± 5.08	0.13	2.46	0.13

ISSN: 1757-6512