|
Small et al. 2014 [123]
|
2
|
73
|
Fat transfer to reconstructed breasts
|
Two donor sites: abdomen and thighs
|
Measured pre- and post-operative 3D scans to assess volumetric changes. No statistically significant difference between donor sites
| | |
|
Lim et al. 2012 [124]
|
2
|
27
|
Patients with craniofacial microsomia, Treacher Collins syndrome
|
Two groups: abdomen and non-abdominal sites
|
Measured 2D analysis using pre-op and post-op photographs. Adipose tissue from abdominal or non-abdominal sources equally corrected asymmetry
| | |
|
Padoin et al. 2008 [32]
|
2
|
25
|
Liposuction aspirate
|
Six donor sites: upper abdomen, lower abdomen, knee, inner thigh, flank and trochanteric region
| |
The cell concentration in lower abdomen and inner thigh was statistically higher than in other areas
| |
|
Geissler et al. 2014 [27]
|
2
|
24
|
Liposuction aspirate
|
Three donor sites: lower abdomen, thigh and flank
| |
In younger patients, adipocyte viability was greater in the lower abdomen than in the flank; in older patients, this difference was not seen. Higher viability of flank adipocytes in the older group compared with younger group
| |
|
Jurgens et al. 2008 [64]
|
2
|
22
|
Liposuction aspirate
|
Two donor sites: abdomen and hip/thigh
| |
ADSC yield significantly higher from abdominal aspirate
|
No statistical difference in absolute number of nucleated cells and differentiation capacity
|
|
Rohrich et al. 2004 [67]
|
2
|
5
|
Liposuction aspirate
|
Three donor sites: knee, flank and abdomen
| |
No statistical difference in viability
| |
|
Choudhery et al. 2014 [120]
|
2
|
3
|
Liposuction aspirate
|
Five donor sites: abdomen, flank, thigh, scarpas fascia, submental jowl
| |
No statistical difference in proliferation
| |
|
Di Taranto et al. 2015 [125]
|
2
|
1
|
Liposuction aspirate
|
Superficial versus deep abdominal fat
| | |
Superficial fat increased differentiation capacity
|
|
Ullmann et al. 2005 [68]
|
2
|
45 nude mice (15 in 3 groups)
|
Fat from one woman injected into 3 groups with 15 nude mice each
|
Three donor sites: abdomen, breast and thigh
| |
Fat compared for viability and volume retention showing no statistical difference
| |
|
Li et al. 2013 [66]
|
2
|
30 nude mice (6 in 5 groups)
|
Fat from six women injected into nude mice
|
Five donor sites: flank, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, medial thigh, lateral thigh viability
|
.
|
Cell count and assay by flow cytometry and graft evaluation at 12 weeks post-transplantation and showed no statistical difference
| |
