From: Enhancement strategies for mesenchymal stem cells and related therapies
Modification strategy | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
MSCs for drug delivery | Easily performed in culture | Short cell life after engraftment |
 | GMP grade existing drugs more readily available | Drug effects on stem cell itself |
 |  | Not possible to load all drugs |
 |  | Required short interval between loading and administration |
Anti-microbial enhancement | Allows specific targeting of identified pathogens | Of less relevance outside infectious disease |
Licensing strategies | Rely on endogenous mechanisms | Full licensing environment difficult to recreate |
 | Proven cryopreservation compatibility |  |
Hypoxia priming | Enhances cell proliferation during manufacture as well as efficacy | Requires specific manufacturing equipment |
Differentiation prior to engraftment | Â | Can be long and difficult manufacturing process |
Gene modifications | A wide range of possible therapeutic proteins can be expressed | Unpredictable effects of transgene on stem cell |
 |  | Risk of stem cell mutagenesis with some vector options |
Small molecule priming | Inexpensive and simple methodology | Possible off-target effects on MSC |
 | Wide availability of GMP compounds |  |
EV enhancement | Increased safety / lower immunogenicity due to no cell involved | Heterogeneity within EV batches due to culturing and isolation methods |
 | Easier storage and delivery of therapeutic | Large scale production still problematic |