Skip to main content

Table 2 General, typical, variant, and uncommon subdomains within each theme considered, based on the qualitative analysis of researchers’ stance over the ethical discussion on HCOs

From: Human cerebral organoids: the ethical stance of scientists

General themes, domains, and sub-domains

Frequency

On consciousness and moral status

 Consciousness

  Skepticism about consciousness emerging in HCOs today

General

  Skepticism about consciousness emerging in HCOs in the future

Variant

  Repercussions on the usage of HCOs if consciousness is detected

Typical

  Consciousness in HCOs would be similar to that of flies or grasshoppers

Uncommon

 Moral status

  There is no ethically relevant difference between HCOs and other tissue products

Typical

  There is an ethically relevant difference between HCOs and other tissue products

Variant

 Human/non-human chimeras

  Chimeras are no different compared to other animals without HCOs grafts

General

 Personal ethical concerns

  No personal ethical concern

Typical

Personal experience with HCOs

 HCOs as “mini-brains”

  HCOs are not “mini-brains”

Typical

  Rejection of the usage of the term “mini-brains”

Variant

  Acceptance of the usage of the term “mini-brains”

Variant

 Effective contribution of HCOs to research

  Disease modeling as future application

Typical

  Treatment development as future application

Variant

  Study of healthy human brain development as future application

Variant

  Skepticism on the effective usefulness of HCOs

Variant

Personal attitude toward the ethical debate

Positive attitude toward the ethical debate

Typical

 Informed consent

  Need of specific informed consent for donating for HCOs

Typical

  No need of specific informed consent for donating for HCOs

Variant

 Guidelines and regulations

  Current guidelines are sufficient

Typical

  Current guidelines should be updated

Variant

 Impact of ethics over research

  Concerns that the ethical discussion could slow research down

Variant

  No concern that the ethical discussion could slow research down

Typical

Personal attitude toward the public

Good relationship between science and public

Variant

Science-public relationship could be improved

Variant

Poor relationship between science and public

Variant

  1. Note General = 21–17 participants, typical = 16–10 participants, variant = 9–4 participants, uncommon < 3 participants