From: Mesenchymal chondroprogenitor cell origin and therapeutic potential
Source | Advantages | Disadvantages | Cell surface phenotype |
---|---|---|---|
Twenty to fifty percent of cells are tri-potent Contains specifically chondroprogenitor subpopulations High expansion potential | Heterogeneous population of cells Contains fewer CFU-Fs compared to other cell sources Invasive procedure to harvest | CD105+, CD73+, CD44+, CD90+, CD271+, CD14+, CD13+, CD166+, CD34-, CD45-, CD117-, CD31-, VEGFR-2- | |
High expansion potential regardless of donor age Superior chondrogenic differentiation potential No reduction in cell number or potential with donor age Increase in progenitor cell numbers in early OA | Heterogeneous population of cells | CD105+, CD73+, CD44+, CD90+, CD271+, CD13+, CD166+, CD10-, CD34-, CD45-, CD117-, CD31-, VEGFR-2 | |
Abundant source of progenitor cells Superior retention of differentiation potential upon expansion | Comparable differentiation capacity to other tissue sources Relatively early senescence | CD105+, CD73+, CD44+, CD166+, CD271+, CD13+, CD90+, CD34-, CD45-, CD31-, VEGF-2- | |
Tendon [43] | Tri-potent cell population, positive chondrogenic differentiation, however, excelling in osteo- and adipogenic potential Significant expansion potential | Low availability of autologous tendon tissue Minimal chondrogenic capacity | CD105+, CD73+, CD44+, CD90+, CD271+, CD13+, CD166+, CD14-, CD34-, CD45-, CD117-, CD31-, VEGFR-2- |
Periosteum [28] | Progenitors are multi-potent Significant in vitro expansion potential and clonogenicity despite donor age | Consists of a heterogeneous population of cells Invasive harvest procedure | CD105+, CD166+, CD13+, CD73+, D7-FIB+, CD90+, CD44+, CD10+, CD34-, CD45-, CD117-, CD31-, VGFR-2- |