Skip to main content
Download PDF

Intradermal injection of human adipose-derived stem cells accelerates skin wound healing in nude mice

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 6, Article number: 241 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The use of stem cells from adipose tissue or adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in regenerative medicine could be an interesting alternative to bone marrow stem cells because they are easily accessible and available in large quantities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of ASCs on the healing of 12 mm diameter-excisional wounds (around 110 mm2) in nude mice.

Methods

Thirty nude mice underwent surgery to create one 12-mm excisional wound per mouse (spontaneous healing, n = 6; Cytocare® 532, n = 12; ASCs, n = 12). The Galiano wound model was chosen to avoid shrinkage and thus slow the spontaneous healing (SH) of mouse skin, making it closer to the physiology of human skin healing. Transparent dressings were used to enable daily healing time measurements to be taken. Immunohistochemistry, histological and blood perfusion analysis were carried out on the healed skin.

Results

The in vivo results showed the effectiveness of using ASCs on reducing the time needed for complete healing to 21.2 days for SH, 17.4 days for vehicle alone (Cytocare® 532) and 14.6 days with the addition of ASCs (p < 0.001). Moreover, cutaneous perfusion of the healed wound was significantly improved in ASC-treated mice compared to SH group, as shown by laser Doppler flowmetry and the quantitation of blood vessels using immunohistochemistry of αsmooth muscle actin.

Conclusions

The tolerance and efficacy of cryopreserved ASCs to accelerate the complete closure of the wound by increasing the maturation of the skin and its blood perfusion, shows their therapeutic benefit in the wound healing context.

Background

Wounds are challenges that are often encountered in plastic and reconstructive surgery [1]. Indeed, healing is compromised in many situations such as diabetes, chronic renal failure, and irradiation, but also with age [2]. So, faced with an aging population today, chronic wounds are a real public health problem [3, 4]. The main aims of treatment are the rapid closure of the wound to restore the barrier function of the skin and prevent infection, the suppression of pain, and functional recovery, allowing a rapid return to a normal social and professional life, and equally important, obtaining a satisfactory result from an aesthetic point of view.

Many strategies have been tried with varying success in the treatment of chronic wounds: the injection of growth factors [5–7], grafts of temporary skin substitutes (porcine xenograft, synthetic membranes, atelocollagen matrix, and allogenic substitutes) [7, 8], or permanent ones (epidermal substitutes and cultured dermis) [9, 10]. However, large wounds, under adverse local and systemic conditions (low vascularization, metabolic disease, etc), respond poorly to these treatments and frequently reopen.

Over the last decade, plastic surgery has been marked by the introduction of many reconstructive therapies based on the use of stem cells. These are undifferentiated cells with self-renewing properties that are able to divide and generate specialized cells, including skin cells [11]. From this point of view, the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue has been shown to be very effective in experimental healing models. The suggested mechanism of action is the increased cell proliferation and vascularization, modulation of inflammation, and increased fibroblastic activity of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) present in the SVF [12]. ASCs share many properties with mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and cord blood, including their multipotency and, in particular, their potential to differentiate into endothelial cells and fibroblasts [11]. However, SVF is a heterogeneous cell suspension containing a small percentage (between 1 and 3 %) of ASCs [13, 14]. Today, using protocols for the isolation and in vitro expansion of ASCs, it is easily possible to obtain a homogeneous therapeutic product containing more than 90 % ASCs [15]. In addition, the ASC amplification phase requires their extraction from only a small volume of lipoaspirate, which is particularly advantageous in frail, elderly or diabetic patients. Finally, the possibility of freezing ASCs pending their therapeutic use, offers the opportunity to 1) perform all the necessary safety checks before releasing the therapy product and 2) repeat the treatment if necessary.

Of the preclinical trials performed so far using ASCs, most have been performed on rodents [16–28] and only a few on porcine [29–33] and rabbit [34, 35] models, probably due to the lack of availability, high cost, management difficulty and the strong shrinkage of the wound, due to the presence of dermal muscles. The ready availability of murine models, together with ease of management and sampling, may explain their frequent use in such trials. Monitoring of the healing is most often done bi-weekly at the same time as the dressings are changed, which prevents a daily assessment of wound closure. For these reasons, we chose the Galiano wound model [36] to avoid significant shrinkage observed on mice and thus slow the closure of their wound, making it closer to the physiology of human skin healing. In addition, a larger wound area than usual (12 mm instead of 6 mm in most protocols) was created and covered with a transparent dressing in order to carry out daily measurements of the surface of the wound and assess the total healing time more precisely.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate, in this optimized healing model, the effectiveness of injecting a controlled dose of cultured ASCs, using different criteria such as wound healing kinetics and skin perfusion. Furthermore, in order to avoid their dispersion in the subcutaneous tissue, ASCs were injected in an European Community-approved (EC labeled) hyaluronic acid gel with added vitamins and minerals (Cytocare® 532, Revitacare Laboratory, Saint-Ouen-l’Aumône, France) that we tested for biocompatibility, bioavailability and tolerance [37].

Methods

Adipose tissue collection

Surgical residue was harvested according to French regulations and declared to the Research Ministry (DC n°2008162) following written informed consent from the patients.

Method for final product preparation: ASCs in Cytocare® 532

Human SVF was isolated from lipoaspirate obtained from three randomly chosen healthy volunteers undergoing optimized liposuction [38], using 3 mm cannulae. Briefly, adipose tissue was digested with collagenase (0.120U/ml, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) at 37 °C for 30 min and under constant shaking. Digestion was stopped by adding Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM with glutamax, Gibco (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10 % fetal calf serum (FCS, HyClone, Logan, UT, USA). Floating adipocytes were discarded and cells from the SVF were pelleted, rinsed with medium, centrifuged (300 g for 5 min. at 20 °C) and incubated in an erythrocyte lysis buffer for 20 min at 37 °C. This cell suspension was centrifuged (300 g for 5 min, 20 °C) and cells were counted using the Trypan blue exclusion method.

A total of 40,000 SVF cells/cm2 were plated and grown in proliferation medium containing DMEM (Gibco, Life technologies), HAM-F12 L-Glutamine (Gibco®, Life technologies, St Aubin, France) (v/v), 10 % FCS (HyClone), 10 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2, Miltenyi Biotec, Paris, France), 10 μg/ml of gentamicin and 100 UI/ml penicillin (Panpharma, Fougeres, France). The medium was changed three times a week until 80 % confluence was reached. At subconfluency, cells were detached with trypsin-0.01 % EDTA (Invitrogen) and centrifuged for 10 min at 300 g and amplified in subculture at 4,000 cells/cm2 density (passage 1). At subconfluency, the cells were trypsinized, counted and cryopreserved in FCS/DMSO (90/10, v/v) (DMSO, Wak Chemie Medical GmbH, Steinbach, Germany). Samples were harvested for all the quality controls described below. On the day of surgery, the cells were thawed, washed, counted, and then mixed with the vehicle (Cytocare® 532) for injection into nude mice at a density of 1.106 cells/ml of Cytocare® 532.

Characterization of adipose-derived stem cells

Unless indicated, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO.

Cells were characterized for their phenotype using flow cytometry. Briefly, after detachment, cells were re-suspended in PBS at a concentration of 1-2 million/mL. Then, 100 μL of this cell suspension were stained in PBS using FITC-coupled CD45 and PE-coupled CD90, CD73, CD14, CD34, and HLA-DR antibodies or appropriate isotypic controls (All from BD Biosciences, Le pont de Claix, France). At least twenty thousand events were acquired with a FACSCanto II cytometer (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) and analyzed (DIVA software).

The cells were then tested for their ability to differentiate into various mesodermal lineages. For adipogenic differentiation, confluent cells at passage 1 were induced using adipogenic medium consisting of DMEM supplemented with 10 % of FCS, 10 μg/mL of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), 100 μM of indomethacin, 1 μM of dexamethasone and 200 mUI of insulin (Umulin, Lilly laboratories, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France). After 14 days, lipid droplets were stained using 0.4 % Oil Red O solution after 10 % formalin fixation.

For osteogenic differentiation, sub-confluent cells at passage 1 were induced using a StemPro® osteogenesis differentiation kit (Gibco®, Life technologies, St Aubin, France). After three weeks, cells were fixed and stained with 40 mM Alizarin red (Merck Millipore, Fontenay sous Bois, France) to visualize calcium deposition.

Chondrogenic differentiation was evaluated using the high-density pellet culture approach, as previously described [39]. Briefly, subconfluent cells at P1 were detached using trypsin-EDTA, numerated, and 2.5×105 viable ASCs were centrifuged (300 g, 10 min, two times) in a V-bottom 96-well plate (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) to form a pellet. The pellets were treated for 28 days with defined chondrogenic medium, which consisted of DMEM-F12 (4.5 g/L glucose, Life Technologies, St Aubin, France), 1 % of insulin-transferrin-selenium (ITS, Life Technologies, St Aubin, France), 100 nM dexamethasone, 170 μM L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 350 μM L-proline, 10 ng/mL of transforming growth factor β3 (TGFβ3, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 50 ng/mL bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2, InductOs, Wyeth, Taplow, UK).

Proliferation medium was used for each differentiation control condition. The medium was changed three times a week.

In vivo experimental protocol in nude mice

The present study was performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85–23, revised 1996). All the experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Lyon I Claude Bernard University (DR-2014-25).

Thirty male, nude, seven-week-old mice were anesthetized with buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) and ketamine (20 mg/ml) and surgery was performed under standard sterile conditions. One circular, full thickness 12 mm diameter wound was created on the back of each mouse and a ring of silicone (Folioxane®, ref FU050M, Novatech, La Ciotat, France) was sutured in place to prevent skin retraction.

During the follow-up, buprenorphine was administrated intra-peritoneally every day at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg/day during the first week and 0.05 mg/kg/day during the second week to avoid suffering. Each wound on each mouse was injected intradermally with 1 mL of final product containing 1.106 ASCs (500 μL Cytocare 532 containing 0.5 × 106 cells) around the wound into four injection sites and the other 500 μL applied onto the wound surface as previously described [20].

Briefly, one wound was created on each of the 30 mice randomly divided into three groups: 6 mice in the spontaneous healing (SH) group, 12 mice in the vehicle group (Cytocare® 532), and 12 mice (four per each ASC donor) in the ASCs group (ASCs in Cytocare® 532).

Tolerance evaluation

Tolerance was assessed by the detection of serious side-effects (death), observation of the state of the wounds (oozing, infection), and general monitoring of the animals through weight gain and finally pain, using the McGill pain scale [40].

Wound closure measurements

Every day, mice were observed and digital images were taken. Wound area was measured by tracing the wound margin and calculating the pixel area using image analysis software (Adobe Photoshop 7.0).

The wound healing rate was calculated as follows:

$$ 100-\frac{\left(\mathrm{Surface}\ \mathrm{o}\mathrm{f}\ \mathrm{actual}\ \mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\ \mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\hbox{-} \mathrm{epithelialized}\ \mathrm{zone}\right)}{\left(\mathrm{Surface}\ \mathrm{at}\ \mathrm{D}0\right)}\times \kern0.62em 100 $$

Histological and immunohistochemical analyses

On day 27, the scar tissue was harvested with a rim of healthy normal tissue. Tissue samples were fixed in 10 % buffered formalin before embedding in paraffin. For histological analysis, tissue sections (3 μm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated and then stained with Masson’s trichrome or picro-sirius red. Following staining, slides were dehydrated with graded solutions of ethanol and methylcyclohexane baths and sealed with Permount mounting medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Saint Aubin, France).

For Masson’s trichrome, stained slides were scanned with a Mirax Scanner (Zeiss, Marly le Roi, France) and images were taken using a digital camera (Hitachi HV F22) and Mirax Scan 150 software (v 1.2, Zeiss). Images were analyzed using Pannoramic viewer software (v 1.15, 3DHistech, Budapest, Hungary). For picro-sirius red, stained slides were observed under polarized light (Leica DM 2000) and images were taken using a digital camera (Leica DFC420C) and LAS v4 software (Leica).

For immunohistochemical examination, all the washing steps consisted of three times 5 min each in PBS containing 0.2 % Tween 20. Three μm-thick sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated using methylcyclohexane, graded ethanol and running tap water baths. Antigens were retrieved using ficin for 10 min at 42 °C (Digest-All 1 Ficin, Life Technologies, St Aubin, France) and sections were then cut. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inactivated for 20 min with PBS containing 3 % normal goat serum (NGS, Merck Millipore, Fontenay sous Bois, France) and 5 % hydrogen peroxide (Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). Afterwards, non-specific protein binding was avoided by blocking with PBS containing 5 % NGS. Primary mouse anti-mouse alpha smooth muscle actin (clone αsm-1, Leica Microsystems, Nanterre, France) was diluted 1:200 in PBS containing 5 % NGS and applied to the sections that were incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humid chamber. The sections were then washed and the secondary antibody (Envision + system HRP labelled polymer anti-mouse, Dako, Les Ulis, France) was applied for 45 min at room temperature. After a last washing step, the detected antigens were visualized by incubation with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Liquid DAB+ Substrate Chromogen System, Dako, Les Ulis, France). Finally, sections were counterstained with Mayers hematoxylin, and mounted using Faramount aqueous mounting medium (Dako).

Assessment of skin perfusion

For all the experiments, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and then placed in a heated environment to maintain a stable cutaneous temperature (35.0 ± 0.5 °C) throughout the measurements. Mice were placed in the prone position and skin blood flow (SBF) was measured using a laser Doppler imager (PERISCAN PIM3, Perimed, Sweden).

SBF was recorded for 1 min and signal analysis was performed off-line by calculating the average perfusion on each surface (43 mm2) of interest (PIMSoft software, Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden).

Assessment of cutaneous microcirculation

To test the cutaneous microcirculation, two experiments were conducted in the three groups as previously described [41, 42]: endothelium-independent vasodilation in response to sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was evaluated, as well as endothelium-dependent vasodilation in response to acetylcholine (ACh).

For the experiments, animals were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium thiopental (65 mg/kg). The level of anesthesia was determined by testing eye reflexes and tail pinch. The animals were then settled in an incubator (MMS, Chelles, France) heated to maintain a stable cutaneous temperature (35.0 ± 0.5 °C). Mice were placed in the prone position, followed by a 20 min resting period to stabilize the blood pressure and cutaneous temperature. Tail noninvasive blood pressure (IITC, Woodland Hills, CA) was recorded before and after the experiments to verify mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) stability. At the end of each experiment, the animals were killed by an overdose of thiopental.

To test endothelium-independent and -dependent responses, skin blood flow (SBF) was recorded during transcutaneous iontophoresis, using a laser Doppler multifiber probe (481-1, Perimed) applied to a 1.2 cm2 hairless area on the back of the animals. Endothelium-independent response was assessed using cathodal SNP iontophoretic delivery (67 mmol/L; Nitriate®; SERB, Paris, France) with the application of a 100 μA current for 20 s. Endothelium-dependent response was assessed using anodal ACh iontophoretic delivery (5.5 mmol/L; Sigma, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) with the application of a 100 μA current for 10 s. SNP and ACh were dissolved in deionized water. SNP- and ACh-induced vasodilator responses are reported as the maximal percentage increase from baseline in response to the iontophoretic delivery of SNP and ACh, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism 4 software. All the data are expressed as means ± SEM. For the wound healing rate, unpaired t-tests were carried out to evaluate statistical significance. For complete wound closure, the Kruskal-Wallis test was followed by a Dunn’s multiple comparison test to estimate the significance of differences for between-group comparisons. For skin perfusion and assessment of endothelium-independent and -dependent response experiments, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was followed by a multiple comparison test to estimate the significance of differences for between-group comparisons. Significance was defined at p < 0.05.

Results

ASC characterization

Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were isolated using our laboratory’s routine method. Briefly, adipose tissue was collagenase-digested and cells were collected as the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and grown in proliferation medium until passage 1 (two subcultures). Cells were characterized by flow cytometry and displayed a mesenchymal stem cell phenotype (Fig. 1a) as more than 98 % of the cells expressed CD90, CD73, and HLA-ABC and less than 2 % expressed CD14, HLA-DR, and CD45. Furthermore, these cells were able to differentiate towards adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic lineages, as shown by Oil red O, Alizarin red, and Alcian blue staining, respectively (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Immunophenotyping and trilineage differentiation of ASC. a ASCs were stained with antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. ASCs expressed markers CD73, CD90, and HLA ABC and were negative for CD45, CD14, and HLA DR. Representative histograms are shown. b ASCs were cultured in adipogenic, osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation medium. Cells were fixed and stained with Oil Red O for adipogenesis, Alizarin red for osteogenesis and Alcian blue for chondrogenesis. Representative images are shown. Scale bar = 100 μm. ASCs adipose-derived stem cells, CD cluster of differentiation, HLA human leukocyte antigen

Full size image

Animal experiments

Throughout the experiment we had to exclude three mice for the loss of the ring causing a strong retraction of the wound and skewing the results except for tolerance. Analysis of the effectiveness was performed on 27 wounds: 6 untreated SH controls, 11 with the vehicle alone (Cytocare® 532), 10 with ASCs in Cytocare® 532.

Tolerance

No serious side effects were observed following treatment. Whatever the treatment, no secondary infection was identified after the wounds. Only normal exudation phases were observed for each mouse, more or less late in the study. No behavioral abnormalities were detected in the mice with regard to food intake and spontaneous motor activity. An average 10 % weight gain was observed during the study period.

Effects of ASCs on the kinetics of skin healing

All wounds had an initial area of around 110 mm2 (radius = 12 mm). Figure 2a shows the representative digital images of the evolution of wound healing for each group at 0, 7, 14, and 21 days post-surgery. Figure 2b shows the percentage of wound healing rate over time post-surgery. During the first week, no differences were observed between the different treatments: 20 % of the wound was re-epithelialized. Then, from the seventh day post-surgery, a significant acceleration of wound healing was observed, for all treatments, compared to untreated wounds (SH group). By the thirteenth day, there was 85 % epithelialization with cultured ASCs, 68 % in the vehicle group and 40 % without treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Influence of ASCs on wound healing kinetics. a After surgery, nude mice were intradermally injected or not with Cytocare® 532 or ASCs. Representative images are shown for 0, 7, 14, and 21 days post-surgery. Scale bar 5 mm. b Percentage of wound healing was monitored every day until complete wound closure. Results are expressed as means, with error bars indicating SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired t-test. * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and † p < 0.001 compared to spontaneous healing. c Days to complete wound closure were noted. Results are expressed as means of days needed to reach complete closure and error bars indicate SEM. The Kruskal-Wallis test was followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests to estimate the significance of differences for between-group comparisons. *** p < 0.001 compared to spontaneous healing. ASCs adipose-derived stem cells

Full size image

The time to complete healing was significantly shortened after treatment with ASCs (Fig. 2c). Indeed, in the group treated with ASCs, the number of days to closure was significantly lower than in the two control groups, 14.6 ± 0.3 days for ASC in Cytocare® 532, 21.2 ± 1.1 (p < 0.001) days without treatment, and 17.4 days ± 0.8 with Cytocare® 532 alone, p <0.05. Thus, these results show that treatment with ASCs represents a gain of time to wound closure of more than six days versus SH and 2.8 days versus vehicle alone.

Histological analysis of scar tissue

Masson’ trichrome staining (Fig. 3) was used to analyze the overall quality of scarred areas. All the biopsies presented a good stratified and differentiated epithelium. The dermis appeared much thinner in the ASC group, with more homogenous ECM than in the two controls groups, SH and Cytocare® 532, in which the dermis appeared less vascularized and more inflammatory. Moreover, picro-sirius red staining under polarized light showed more red collagen fibers in the ASC group than in the two control groups.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Wound histology after Masson’s trichrome and Picro Sirius red staining. Tissue sections obtained from the wound area at day 27 after cell injection were stained with Masson’s trichrome (left panel) and Picro Sirius red (right panel). Representative micrographs of wound histological images are shown. ASCs adipose-derived stem cells

Full size image

Skin perfusion

Skin perfusion, measured on the scar tissue on day 27, was significantly higher in the ASCs group (ASCs 4.4 ± 0.5 a.u./mm than in the untreated (2.5 ± 0.4 a.u./mm2) and vehicle 2.8 ± 0.2 a.u./mm2; P < 0.01) groups. There was no statistical difference between the untreated and vehicle groups.

Assessment of endothelium-dependent response

In the untreated and vehicle groups, skin blood flow (SBF) increased in response to iontophoretic delivery of ACh, corresponding to an endothelium-dependent vasodilation of 33 ± 6 % and 33 ± 3 %, respectively. The ACh-induced vasodilation observed in the ASCs group (55 ± 7 %) was significantly higher than in both the untreated and vehicle groups (P < 0.05).

Assessment of endothelium-independent response

In all groups, SBF increased in response to iontophoretic delivery of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and no difference was observed in the endothelium-independent vasodilation between groups (untreated 47 ± 13 %, vehicle 51 ± 6 %, ASCs 44 ± 8 %).

Quantification of dermal capillary density

Immunohistochemistry of αSMA (Fig. 4d) showed no significant differences between the two control groups, as the number of total blood vessels in the healed area was 17.33 ± 0.27 and 23.67 ± 0.54 for the SH and Cytocare® 532 groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Although there was no statistical difference in the vascular density between ASC-treated and Cytocare 532-treated mice, the ASCs in Cytocare 532 treatment showed an increase in the number of blood vessels to 95 ± 9.3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Quantitative and functional aspects of blood perfusion in the healed tissue. a Quantification of perfusion at day 27 after surgery was performed on the healed tissue compared with normal skin using laser Doppler imaging. b Percentage of vasodilation after ACh iontophoresis and c after SNP iontophoresis in SH-, Cytocare® 532- and ASC-treated mice. d One-way ANOVA was followed by a multiple comparison test to estimate the significance of differences for between-group comparisons. Significance was defined at P < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 vs. control. Tissue sections obtained from the wound area 27 days after cell injection were stained with antibody against alpha smooth muscle actin and blood vessels in the total wound area were quantified. Representative images of the staining are displayed for each group. The Kruskal-Wallis test was followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test to estimate the significance of differences for between-group comparisons. * p < 0.05 compared to spontaneous healing. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Ach acetylcholine, ASCs adipose-derived stem cells, SH spontaneous healing, SNP sodium nitroprusside

Full size image

Discussion

Many treatments using SVF [43, 44] and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are already in use [45–48] in plastic and cosmetic surgery. The main problem encountered with SVF-based therapy is the poor reproducibility of the outcomes, which might be due to the insufficiency of ASCs. For this reason, SVF is now often used in combination with fat in what is known as cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) [45, 49, 50].

In this preclinical study, we demonstrate the tolerance and therapeutic effectiveness of human cultured ASCs in a mouse wound model. The cells were intradermally administered in a skin-protecting and antioxidant nutrient vehicle, Cytocare® 532, for which the biocompatibility and bioavailability of ASCs in Cytocare® 532 were previously shown [37]. In terms of in vivo tolerance, no impact was noticed on mortality and no infection was observed despite the absence of antibiotics. In all the tested groups, the pain due to the excisional wound, evaluated on the Mogill pain scale [40], was controlled by the daily administration of buprenorphine over the first two weeks.

Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of ASCs must take into account the characteristics of the chosen wound model in our study. In this model, a Galiano silicone ring was sutured to the edges of the wound to prevent retraction and lengthen the average healing time by eight days, as previously shown [20, 51, 52]. It is now considered that the average time for the complete closure of a 10 mm wound increases from 12 days without, to 20 days with, a ring [23]. Our results were essentially the same in the SH group with 21 days for a slightly larger wound (12 mm), and with an accurate assessment since the readings were performed frequently. The use of a transparent dressing greatly improves wound tracking from both an ethical and a practical point of view as it permits daily monitoring of the percentage of epithelialization and the time to complete wound closure without the need to sacrifice the animal before each observation, as has been done in some experimental protocols [25]. In the literature, the assessment of wound closure is usually performed once or twice per week [23, 53], or sometimes only once during the entire healing period [54], by removing the dressing after the mice are under anesthesia, with the additional risk of tearing the newly formed epithelium, or sacrificing an animal at each observation.

Overall, when considering the main evaluation criterion, i.e., the time for full wound closure, the improvements we have made to the Galiano model include: 1) a daily reading of re-epithelialization, made possible by the use of transparent dressings; and 2) increases in the initial wound surface (12 mm instead of the 6 mm often practiced) [20, 24]. This greater wound area will increase the intra-group reproducibility (in this study, the SEM for the mean time to wound closure ranged from 0.3 % to 1.1 depending on the group) and the sensitivity of the model to assess treatments promoting wound healing.

Using this model, the effect of ASCs on wound healing was shown, by significantly shortening the time to complete healing by more than six days, when compared to the SH group (p < 0.001). Overall, these results confirm the literature data showing accelerated healing after administration of ASCs [20, 53]. However, it should be noted that these studies differ from ours by the choice of model (see above) and the vehicle, which in some cases is also not specified. With no need to pull off dressings, the use of a vehicle [37, 55] to avoid dilution or loss of ASCs after injection, as well as the daily monitoring of healing, we put aside many biased interpretations and facilitated the experiment.

Our results also suggest that Cytocare® 532, selected as the vehicle, operates to potentiate the ASC effect. In fact, its main component, hyaluronic acid [56], a macromolecule forming a fundamental part of the extracellular matrix of the skin, plays a vital role in the healing process by controlling cell migration and proliferation, as well as modulating the inflammatory and angiogenic processes in the early stages of healing, and progressive tissue remodeling [57–60].

Beyond the healing time criterion, one of the therapy objectives now being tested in healing models is obtaining a good repair, the closest possible to healthy skin to prevent recurrence of the wound and the development of a chronic wound, as often observed in obese and diabetic patients. Histological aspects of the skin revealed by Masson’s trichrome staining showed that the treatment strongly improved the quality of the dermis which seemed to be in the remodeling phase in ASC-treated mice, while still in the proliferative phase with many inflammatory cells in the SH and Cytocare® 532 groups (Fig. 3, left panel). Furthermore, picro-sirius red staining highlighted the presence of type I collagen, as shown by the presence of red fibers in the healed tissue, whereas the majority of the fibers observed in the SH and Cytocare® 532 groups were green, revealing the presence of type III collagen [61, 62].

One of the most important parameters for quality healing is vascularization. A perfusion defect, whether it is associated with poorly functioning blood vessels or low neo-angiogenic levels, leads to a risk of relapse, sustainability of the wound or necrosis. Our results show that there is no defect in vascular smooth muscle function (Fig. 4a, b and c), suggesting that the enhanced endothelial response observed in the ASC groups could reflect an improved endothelial function within the wound healed tissue under ASC treatment. An increase in dermal vascular density (Fig. 4d) could suggest that ASC treatment could promote angiogenesis during the wound healing process, which, in turn, could also lead to improved microcirculation and to a reduced wound healing delay, compared to the control groups. The potential of ASCs in promoting revascularization has already been shown [33].

These results suggest that in our wound model, ASCs can improve perfusion by directly affecting the function of these vessels or indirectly through a reduction in fibrosis and acceleration of the healing process. Overall, our study shows the therapeutic benefit of ASCs in the wound healing context and their effect on shortening the healing period, increasing perfusion. The healing effect that we observe here is promising for application, particularly in cases of chronic wounds that sometimes lead to a therapeutic impasse that could become life-threatening for some patients.

Conclusions

The tolerance to, and efficacy of, cryopreserved ASCs, to rapidly obtain the complete closure of a wound by increasing the maturation of the skin and its blood perfusion shows their therapeutic benefit in the wound healing context, reinforcing our in vitro results using a three-dimensional model demonstrating the potential of ASCs to obtain a complete stratified and differentiated epidermis [63].

Abbreviations

Ach:

Acetylcholine

ASC:

Adipose-derived stem cells

BMP2:

Bone morphogenetic protein 2

CD:

Cluster of differentiation

DAB:

3,3′-Diaminobenzidine

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

EC:

European Community

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FCS:

Fetal calf serum

FGF:

Fibroblast growth factor

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

HA:

Hyaluronic acid

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

IBMX:

3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine

ITS:

Insulin-transferrin-selenium

LDF:

Laser Doppler flowmetry

LDI:

Laser Doppler imaging

MABP:

Mean arterial blood pressure

NGS:

Normal goat serum

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

SBF:

Skin blood flow

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

SH:

Spontaneous healing

SNP:

Sodium nitroprusside

SVF:

Stromal vascular fraction

TGFβ3:

Transforming growth factor β3

References

  1. Mustoe T. Understanding chronic wounds: a unifying hypothesis on their pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Am J Surg. 2004;187:65S–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Riedel K, Ryssel H, Koellensperger E, Germann G, Kremer T. Pathogenesis of chronic wounds. Chir Z Für Alle Geb Oper Medizen. 2008;79:526–34. German.

  3. Epstein FH, Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:738–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17:763–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berlanga-Acosta J. Diabetic lower extremity wounds: the rationale for growth factors-based infiltration treatment. Int Wound J. 2011;8:612–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu X, Sun H, Han C, Wang X, Yu W. Topically applied rhGM-CSF for the wound healing: a systematic review. Burns. 2011;37:729–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shankaran V, Brooks M, Mostow E. Advanced therapies for chronic wounds: NPWT, engineered skin, growth factors, extracellular matrices. Dermatol Ther. 2013;26:215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greaves NS, Iqbal SA, Baguneid M, Bayat A. The role of skin substitutes in the management of chronic cutaneous wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2013;21:194–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sibbald RG, Zuker R, Coutts P, Coelho S, Williamson D, Queen D. Using a dermal skin substitute in the treatment of chronic wounds secondary to recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a case series. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005;51:22–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibbs S, van den Hoogenband HM, Kirtschig G, Richters CD, Spiekstra SW, Breetveld M, et al. Autologous full-thickness skin substitute for healing chronic wounds. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:267–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gimble JM, Guilak F. Differentiation potential of adipose derived adult stem (ADAS) cells. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;58:137–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Atalay S, Coruh A, Deniz K. Stromal vascular fraction improves deep partial thickness burn wound healing. Burns. 2014;40:1375–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oedayrajsingh-Varma MJ, van Ham SM, Knippenberg M, Helder MN, Klein-Nulend J, Schouten TE, et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell yield and growth characteristics are affected by the tissue-harvesting procedure. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:166–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourin P, Bunnell BA, Casteilla L, Dominici M, Katz AJ, March KL, et al. Stromal cells from the adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells: a joint statement of the International Federation for Adipose Therapeutics and Science (IFATS) and the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT). Cytotherapy. 2013;15:641–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell JB, McIntosh K, Zvonic S, Garrett S, Floyd ZE, Kloster A, et al. Immunophenotype of human adipose-derived cells: temporal changes in stromal-associated and stem cell-associated markers. Stem Cells. 2006;24:376–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maharlooei MK, Bagheri M, Solhjou Z, Jahromi BM, Akrami M, Rohani L, et al. Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cell (AD-MSC) promotes skin wound healing in diabetic rats. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang SP, Hsu CC, Chang SC, Wang CH, Deng SC, Dai NT, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells seeded on acellular dermal matrix grafts enhance wound healing in a murine model of a full-thickness defect. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:656–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ju X, Pan F, Bai S, Tian X, Tong H, Wang J. An experimental study on repairing full-thickness skin wound by human acellular amniotic membrane loaded with adipose-derived stem cells in rats. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010;24:143–9. Chinese.

  19. Ebrahimian TG, Pouzoulet F, Squiban C, Buard V, André M, Cousin B, et al. Cell therapy based on adipose tissue-derived stromal cells promotes physiological and pathological wound healing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:503–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim JS, Yoo G. Effects of adipose-derived stromal cells and of their extract on wound healing in a mouse model. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25:746–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SH, Lee JH, Cho KH. Effects of human adipose-derived stem cells on cutaneous wound healing in nude mice. Ann Dermatol. 2011;23:150–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin YC, Grahovac T, Oh SJ, Ieraci M, Rubin JP, Marra KG. Evaluation of a multi-layer adipose-derived stem cell sheet in a full-thickness wound healing model. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Amos PJ, Kapur SK, Stapor PC, Shang H, Bekiranov S, Khurgel M, et al. Human adipose-derived stromal cells accelerate diabetic wound healing: impact of cell formulation and delivery. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:1595–606.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Altman AM, Yan Y, Matthias N, Bai X, Rios C, Mathur AB, et al. IFATS collection: human adipose-derived stem cells seeded on a silk fibroin-chitosan scaffold enhance wound repair in a murine soft tissue injury model. Stem Cells. 2009;27:250–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nie C, Yang D, Xu J, Si Z, Jin X, Zhang J. Locally administered adipose-derived stem cells accelerate wound healing through differentiation and vasculogenesis. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:205–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang SP, Huang CH, Shyu JF, Lee HS, Chen SG, Chan JY, et al. Promotion of wound healing using adipose-derived stem cells in radiation ulcer of a rat model. J Biomed Sci. 2013;20:51.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nambu M, Ishihara M, Kishimoto S, Yanagibayashi S, Yamamoto N, Azuma R, et al. Stimulatory effect of autologous adipose tissue-derived stromal cells in an atelocollagen matrix on wound healing in diabetic db/db mice. J Tissue Eng. 2011;2011:158105.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang D, Qi Y, Walker NG, Sindrilaru A, Hainzl A, Wlaschek M, et al. The effect of adipose tissue derived MSCs delivered by a chemically defined carrier on full-thickness cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2501–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yun IS, Jeon YR, Lee WJ, Lee JW, Rah DK, Tark KC, et al. Effect of human adipose derived stem cells on scar formation and remodeling in a pig model: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:1678–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hanson SE, Kleinbeck KR, Cantu D, Kim J, Bentz ML, Faucher LD, et al. Local delivery of allogeneic bone marrow and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for cutaneous wound healing in a porcine model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2013. doi:10.1002/term.1700.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Forcheron F, Agay D, Scherthan H, Riccobono D, Herodin F, Meineke V, et al. Autologous adipocyte derived stem cells favour healing in a minipig model of cutaneous radiation syndrome. PLoS One. 2012;7(2), e31694.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hadad I, Johnstone BH, Brabham JG, Blanton MW, Rogers PI, Fellers C, et al. Development of a porcine delayed wound-healing model and its use in testing a novel cell-based therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2010;78:888–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blanton MW, Hadad I, Johnstone BH, Mund JA, Rogers PI, Eppley BL, et al. Adipose stromal cells and platelet-rich plasma therapies synergistically increase revascularization during wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(Suppl):56S–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pelizzo G, Avanzini MA, Cornaglia AI, Osti M, Romano P, Avolio L, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells for cutaneous wound healing in a rabbit model: pre-clinical study applicable in the pediatric surgical setting. J Transl Med. 2015;13:219.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong SJ, Jia SX, Xie P, Xu W, Leung KP, Mustoe TA, et al. Topically delivered adipose derived stem cells show an activated-fibroblast phenotype and enhance granulation tissue formation in skin wounds. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55640.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Galiano RD, Michaels 5th J, Dobryansky M, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:485–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lequeux C, Rodriguez J, Boucher F, Rouyer O, Damour O, Mojallal A, et al. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility, bioavailability and tolerance of an injectable vehicle for adipose-derived stem/stromal cells for plastic surgery indications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:1491–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Coleman 4th WP, Hendry 2nd SL. Principles of liposuction. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2006;25:138–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM, Yoo JU. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res. 1998;238:265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sotocinal SG, Sorge RE, Zaloum A, Tuttle AH, Martin LJ, Wieskopf JS, et al. The Rat Grimace Scale: a partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions. Mol Pain. 2011;7:55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sigaudo-Roussel D, Demiot C, Fromy B, Koïtka A, Lefthériotis G, Abraham P, et al. Early endothelial dysfunction severely impairs skin blood flow response to local pressure application in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Diabetes. 2004;53:1564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fromy B, Sigaudo-Roussel D, Gaubert-Dahan ML, Rousseau P, Abraham P, Benzoni D, et al. Aging-associated sensory neuropathy alters pressure-induced vasodilation in humans. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;130:849–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chang Q, Li J, Dong Z, Liu L, Lu F. Quantitative volumetric analysis of progressive hemifacial atrophy corrected using stromal vascular fraction-supplemented autologous fat grafts. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1465–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gentile P, Orlandi A, Scioli MG, Pasquali CD, Bocchini I, Curcio CB, et al. A comparative translational study: the combined use of enhanced stromal vascular fraction and platelet-rich plasma improves fat grafting maintenance in breast reconstruction. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:341–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N, Kurita M, Hirohi T, Harii K. Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32:48–55. discussion 56–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mesimäki K, Lindroos B, Törnwall J, Mauno J, Lindqvist C, Kontio R, et al. Novel maxillary reconstruction with ectopic bone formation by GMP adipose stem cells. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kølle SF, Fischer-Nielsen A, Mathiasen AB, Elberg JJ, Oliveri RS, Glovinski PV, et al. Enrichment of autologous fat grafts with ex-vivo expanded adipose tissue-derived stem cells for graft survival: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1113–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. De la Portilla F, Alba F, García-Olmo D, Herrerías JM, González FX, Galindo A. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) for the treatment of complex perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: results from a multicenter phase I/IIa clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28:313–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sterodimas A, de Faria J, Nicaretta B, Papadopoulos O, Papalambros E, Illouz YG. Cell-assisted lipotransfer. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30:78–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Matsumoto D, Sato K, Gonda K, Takaki Y, Shigeura T, Sato T, et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer: supportive use of human adipose-derived cells for soft tissue augmentation with lipoinjection. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:3375–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Le H, Kleinerman R, Lerman OZ, Brown D, Galiano R, Gurtner GC, et al. Hedgehog signaling is essential for normal wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:768–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nie C, Zhang G, Yang D, Liu T, Liu D, Xu J, et al. Targeted delivery of adipose-derived stem cells via acellular dermal matrix enhances wound repair in diabetic rats. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012;9(3):224–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Martínez-Santamaría L, Conti CJ, Llames S, García E, Retamosa L, Holguín A, et al. The regenerative potential of fibroblasts in a new diabetes-induced delayed humanised wound healing model. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22:195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Michaels 5th J, Dobryansky M, Galiano RD, Bhatt KA, Ashinoff R, Ceradini DJ, et al. Topical vascular endothelial growth factor reverses delayed wound healing secondary to angiogenesis inhibitor administration. Wound Repair Regen. 2005;13:506–12.

  55. Mojallal A, Lequeux C, Shipkov C, Rifkin L, Rohrich R, Duclos A, et al. Stem cells, mature adipocytes, and extracellular scaffold: what does each contribute to fat graft survival? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:1061–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Meyer K, Palmer JW. The polysaccharide of the vitreous humor. J Biol Chem. 1934;107:629–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gall Y. Hyaluronic acid: structure, metabolism and implication in cicatrisation. Ann Dermatol Vénéréologie. 2010;37 Suppl 1:S30–9. French.

  58. McKee CM, Lowenstein CJ, Horton MR, Wu J, Bao C, Chin BY, et al. Hyaluronan fragments induce nitric-oxide synthase in murine macrophages through a nuclear factor κB-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:8013–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Horton MR, Shapiro S, Bao C, Lowenstein CJ, Noble PW. Induction and regulation of macrophage metalloelastase by hyaluronan fragments in mouse macrophages. J Immunol. 1999;162:4171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim YM, Oh SH, Choi JS, Lee S, Ra JC, Lee JH, et al. Adipose-derived stem cell-containing hyaluronic acid/alginate hydrogel improves vocal fold wound healing. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:E64–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Junqueira LC, Bignolas G, Brentani RR. Picrosirius staining plus polarization microscopy, a specific method for collagen detection in tissue sections. Histochem J. 1979;11:447–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lc J, Cossermelli W, Brentani R. Differential staining of collagens type I, II and III by Sirius Red and polarization microscopy. Arch Histol Jpn. 1978;41:267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Metral E, Dos Santos M, Thépot A, Rachidi W, Mojallal A, Auxenfans C, Damour O. Adipose-derived stem cells promote skin homeostasis and prevent its senescence in an in vitro skin model. J Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;4:194. http://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/adipose-derived-stem-cells-promote-skinhomeostasis-prevent-senescence-2157-7633.1000194.php?aid=24999.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the IHU OPeRa for funding ASC development, the Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL) for giving us permission to carry out this study, and the laboratory of Pr M. Ovize (University of Lyon) for taking care of the mice. This study was sponsored by the Revitacare laboratory. We thank the local animal care facility (AnexPeau, LBTI UMR CNRS 5305, Lyon) and Jocelyne Vial for technical assistance on animal care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Banque de tissus et cellules, Laboratoire des substituts cutanés, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 5, place d’Arsonval, Pavillon i, 69437, Lyon, France

    Jonathan Rodriguez, Charlotte Lequeux, Ondine Rouyer, Orianne Ardisson & Odile Damour

  2. INSERM U1060, CarMeN laboratory, Oullins, France

    Jonathan Rodriguez & Ali Mojallal

  3. Service de chirurgie plastique, esthétique et reconstructrice, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France

    Fabien Boucher & Ali Mojallal

  4. IBCP-UMR 5305 CNRS, 7 passage du Vercors, 69 367, Lyon, Cedex 07, France

    Charlotte Lequeux, Audrey Josset-Lamaugarny, Ondine Rouyer, Orianne Ardisson, Dominique Sigaudo-Roussel & Odile Damour

  5. Laboratoire Central d’Anatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, Lyon, France

    Héléna Rutschi

  6. Cell and Tissue Bank, Cutaneous Substitute Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 5, place d’Arsonval, Pavillon I, 69437, Lyon, France

    Jonathan Rodriguez

Authors
  1. Jonathan Rodriguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabien Boucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlotte Lequeux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Audrey Josset-Lamaugarny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ondine Rouyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Orianne Ardisson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Héléna Rutschi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dominique Sigaudo-Roussel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Odile Damour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ali Mojallal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Rodriguez.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JR, FB, OD, DSR, AM, and CL contributed to the conception and the study design and manuscript revision. JR, OD, and DSR contributed to manuscript writing and revision, as well as data collection, analysis, interpretation, and shaping. JR, OR, and OA were involved in adipose-derived stem cell isolation, expansion, and data collection. HR and JR performed the histological techniques and the interpretations of generated data. AJR, FB, DSR, and JR contributed to the assessment of skin perfusion and carried out animal experimentation. AJR, OA, OR, and HR also contributed actively to the revision of the manuscript. According to the ICMJE guidelines, all authors have made substantive intellectual contributions to the present study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Odile Damour and Ali Mojallal are co-last authors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodriguez, J., Boucher, F., Lequeux, C. et al. Intradermal injection of human adipose-derived stem cells accelerates skin wound healing in nude mice. Stem Cell Res Ther 6, 241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0238-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0238-3

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512