- Erratum
- Open access
- Published:
Erratum to: Viability of equine mesenchymal stem cells during transport and implantation
Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 7, Article number: 161 (2016)
Erratum
Following the publication of our article [1] the following minor errors and omissions were brought to our attention.
Introduction
Throughout the manuscript, reference should have been made to Bone Marrow Supernatant (BMS) and not Bone Marrow Aspirate (BMA).
Materials and Methods
Apoptosis assay
Assays using Annexin V and propidium iodide were performed on separate samples (replicates) and not as repeated measures, a point that was not made clear in the original article. Separate aliquots of cells for each time point were kept in culture, without media changes, until assayed.
Cell proliferation assay and Metabolic activity
In alamarBlue® experiments relating to transport media, we used the interpretation of proliferation because cells were cultured over several days, allowing time for cell proliferation to take place. In contrast, when interpreting viability assays following needle extrusion, we employed a metabolic activity interpretation because the cells were cultured for a short period (24 h, Fig. 5) when cell proliferation would not be a prominent feature. Measurements in both instances were of fluorescence.
Results
Figure 3: The Key was accidently omitted. The correct figure is provided here (Fig. 3).
Figure 5: The y-axis is incorrectly labelled as “Absorbance”. The correct axis label should read “% non-injected control” and is based on fluorescence readings. The correct figure is provided here (Fig. 5).
Where appropriate, all figure legends in our article should state that error bars represent the standard error of the mean (± SEM).
These corrections do not alter the results or conclusion of the study that (i) the medium used for transportation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells had a significant impact on cell viability with increasing transport time and (ii) the use of a larger needle size (19G) for cell implantation reduced stress-induced loss of viability compared to smaller needle gauges (21G and 23G).
References
Garvican ER, Cree S, Bull L, Smith RKW, Dudhia J. Viability of equine mesenchymal stem cells during transport and implantation. Stem Cell Res Therapy. 2014;5:94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/scrt483.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Garvican, E.R., Cree, S., Bull, L. et al. Erratum to: Viability of equine mesenchymal stem cells during transport and implantation. Stem Cell Res Ther 7, 161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0423-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0423-z