Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Targeted genome engineering in human induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with hemophilia B using the CRISPR-Cas9 system

  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Stem Cell Research & Therapy20189:92

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0839-8

  • Received: 6 October 2017
  • Accepted: 13 March 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Replacement therapy for hemophilia remains a lifelong treatment. Only gene therapy can cure hemophilia at a fundamental level. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats–CRISPR associated nuclease 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) system is a versatile and convenient genome editing tool which can be applied to gene therapy for hemophilia.

Methods

A patient’s induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were generated from their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) using episomal vectors. The AAVS1-Cas9-sgRNA plasmid which targets the AAVS1 locus and the AAVS1-EF1α-F9 cDNA-puromycin donor plasmid were constructed, and they were electroporated into the iPSCs. When insertion of F9 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus was confirmed, whole genome sequencing (WGS) was carried out to detect the off-target issue. The iPSCs were then differentiated into hepatocytes, and human factor IX (hFIX) antigen and activity were measured in the culture supernatant. Finally, the hepatocytes were transplanted into non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency disease (NOD/SCID) mice through splenic injection.

Results

The patient’s iPSCs were generated from PBMNCs. Human full-length F9 cDNA was inserted into the AAVS1 locus of iPSCs of a hemophilia B patient using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. No off-target mutations were detected by WGS. The hepatocytes differentiated from the inserted iPSCs could secrete hFIX stably and had the ability to be transplanted into the NOD/SCID mice in the short term.

Conclusions

PBMNCs are good somatic cell choices for generating iPSCs from hemophilia patients. The iPSC technique is a good tool for genetic therapy for human hereditary diseases. CRISPR-Cas9 is versatile, convenient, and safe to be used in iPSCs with low off-target effects. Our research offers new approaches for clinical gene therapy for hemophilia.

Keywords

  • CRISPR-Cas systems
  • Induced pluripotent stem cells
  • Hemophilia B
  • Genetic therapy
  • Cellular therapy
  • Hepatocyte differentiation

Background

Hemophilia, caused by mutations of coagulation factors VIII (F8) and IX (F9), is one of the best-known hereditary hemorrhagic disorders. The current standard treatment is replacement therapy, which is effective but runs the risk of viral infection, and remains a lifelong treatment. Only gene therapy can cure hemophilia at a fundamental level [1]. The relatively small size of the F9 coding sequence (~ 1.5 kb) makes hemophilia B (HB) a better target for genetic research compared with F8 which causes hemophilia A (HA). Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are widely used in the gene therapy for HB. A recent clinical trial indicated that HB patients retained 1–6% of the normal FIX value over 3 years after AAV8 vector injection [2], and the trial is still in progress. However, immune responses to the AAV capsid limit the wider application of this approach.

In 2013, a versatile and convenient genome editing tool, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats–CRISPR associated nuclease 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) system, was introduced [3, 4]. The system robustly cuts DNA molecules at fixed points through Cas9 endonuclease action in the guide of an engineered single guide RNA (sgRNA). DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) produced by Cas9 can be further processed by homology-directed repair (HDR) and result in precise knock-in of exogenous genes of interest, thereby achieving overexpression of these genes. Compared with traditional gene editing tools, such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), CRISPR-Cas9 is more efficient, much easier to operate, achieves a homozygous mutant, and can bring multiple mutations in different sites at the same time [5]. So far, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has been reported for genome editing in human, mice, zebra fish, yeast, and bacteria [69].

The induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technique is a significant breakthrough in the stem cell domain in the twenty-first century [10, 11], which promotes the development of regenerative medicine. A prominent advantage of iPSCs is that they are not immunogenic when used in personalized cellular therapy. The iPSCs come from a single individual, and are sent back to the same patient after in-vitro genetic engineering or differentiation, avoiding the problem of immunological rejection.

The AAVS1 locus, a “safe-harbor” site, lying in the first intron of the PPP1R12C gene on human chromosome 19, has an open chromosomal region that allows the insertion of an exogenous gene [12]. Many groups targeted the AAVS1 locus using ZFN, TALEN, or CRISPR-Cas9 and described stable transgene expression [3, 1321]. The AAVS1 locus is an excellent choice for transgene expression, so we inserted human full-length F9 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus of iPSCs of a HB patient using CRISPR-Cas9 in this study. The edited iPSCs were then induced to hepatocytes able to secrete human FIX (hFIX), and these hepatocytes were able to be transplanted into non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency disease (NOD/SCID) mice in the short term.

Methods

Generation of iPSCs of the HB patient

The patient with HB was clinically and genetically confirmed in the Institute of Hematology and Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China. iPSC lines were generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs), using four episomal vectors, as described previously [22]. PBMNCs were separated from peripheral venous blood of patients by the Ficoll-Isopaque method. The reprogramming process was completed under hypoxic conditions (4% O2). The four episomal vectors used were supplied by Xiaobing Zhang from the Department of Medicine at Loma Linda University, CA, USA.

Karyotype analysis

For karyotype analysis, iPSCs were harvested after 10 passages, according to a general protocol. The slides were visualized under a microscope and 20 split cells were selected randomly.

Teratoma formation assay

iPSCs were injected intramuscularly into NOD/SCID mice. Teratomas formed within 6–8 weeks and harvested samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. Paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological determinations.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature (RT), and blocked with blocking buffer (PBS + 5% goat serum + 0.3% BSA) for 1 h at RT. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C. The cells were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37 °C. Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 min. Descriptions of the primary and secondary antibodies are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Dusseldorf, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed in triplicate, using a Step-One-Plus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cDNA of nontransfected PBMNCs from the patient was used as negative control, while H1 embryonic stem cells were used as positive control. The primer sequences are presented in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Construction of CRISPR-Cas9 related plasmids

An AAVS1-Cas9-sgRNA plasmid was designed to cut the human AAVS1 locus; the sgRNA sequence was 5′-GGGGCCACTAGGGACAGGAT-3′ [3]. Two donor plasmids, the AAVS1-CAG-GFP-puromycin donor plasmid and the AAVS1-EF1α-F9 cDNA-puromycin donor plasmid, were designed to insert GFP and F9 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus, respectively. The AAVS1-Cas9-sgRNA plasmid, the AAVS1-CAG-GFP-puromycin donor plasmid, and the AAVS1-EF1α-puromycin empty plasmid were bought. We constructed the AAVS1-EF1α-F9 cDNA-puromycin donor plasmid by inserting human full-length F9 cDNA into the AAVS1-EF1α-puromycin empty plasmid. Firstly, F9 cDNA was amplified by forward primer 5′-GGGGTACCCCGCCACCATGCAGCGCGTGAACATGATC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CGACGCGTCGTTAAGTGAGCTTTGTTTTTTCC-3′; then F9 cDNA and the AAVS1-EF1α-puromycin empty plasmid were digested by MluI and KpnI endonuclease; the digested products were then connected by the T4 ligase; and, finally, sequencing was carried out to ensure that no error occurred.

Transfection of HEK293T cells and iPSCs

To test the efficiency of the constructed plasmids, HEK293T cells were firstly transfected using the Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen). iPSCs were electroporated with the same plasmids, using the Lonza Amaxa Human Stem Cell Nucleofector Starter Kit and program B-016. Forward primer (F1) 5′-TTCGGGTCACCTCTCACTCC-3′ and reverse primer (R1) 5′-GGCTCCATCGTAAGCAAACC were used to detect the full inserted fragment. When insertion failed, the amplification length was 468 bp; if successful, the amplification length was 4.9 kb. Forward primer (F2) 5′-TTCCGCATTGGAGTCGCTTTA-3′ and reverse primer (R2) 5′-GTGGGCTTGTACTCGGTCATCT-3′ were used to detect the 5′ junction point of insertion. When insertion failed, nothing could be amplified; if successful, the amplification length was 1.3 kb. GAPDH was amplified as internal control for amount of genomic DNA. Forward primer 5′-ACCCACTCCTCCACCTTT-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CTCTTGTGCTCTTGCTGGG-3′ were used, and the amplification length was 283 bp. Forward primer (F9-F) 5′-TGCTCCTGTACTGAGGGA-3′ and reverse primer (F9-R) 5′-AATGATTGGGTGCTTTGA-3′ were used to detect the expression of F9.

Off-target detection of CRISPR-Cas9

Potential off-target sites that differed from the sgRNA sequence by up to five nucleotides in the genome were searched using the web-based program Cas-OFFinder (http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder/). After insertion was detected in iPSCs, genomic DNAs extracted from the parental iPSCs and the successful inserted iPSCs were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Unique mutations of the inserted iPSCs different from those in the parental iPSCs were selected. These unique mutations were compared with the potential off-target sites to detect whether they overlapped. WGS was carried out at BGI-Shenzhen (Shenzhen, China), yielding 30× coverage. Sequencing was performed on the HiSeq X Ten platform (Illumina, Santiago, CA, USA). Raw image files were processed by Illumina pipeline for base calling with default parameters and the sequences of each individual were generated as 150-bp paired-end reads.

Differentiation of iPSCs into hepatocytes

The differentiation of iPSCs into hepatocytes was carried out as described previously [23], with some modifications: 0.5 μM A83–01 and 0.1 μM Compound E were added during days 11–15.

Characterization of hepatocytic functions

We detected FOXA2, SOX17, and GATA4 on day 5, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4α) on day 10, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) on day 15, and albumin (ALB) on day 20 by immunofluorescence staining. In addition, flow cytometry analysis was performed to detect AFP and ALB according to the provided protocols. The expressions of AFP, ALB, HNF4α, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO2), tyrosine-alpha-testosterone (TAT), and CYP3A4 were detected by qRT-PCR. The primer sequences are presented in Additional file 2: Table S2. For Periodic Acid–Schiff (PAS) staining, after fixation using 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were cultured in 1% periodic acid at 37 °C for 20 min, were dried at 37 °C for 1 h, and then were cultured in Schiff reagent at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. For low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake and LDL-receptor expression, experiments were performed by the protocol provided by the LDL Uptake Cell-Based Assay Kit (Cayman Chemical). For indocyanine green (ICG) uptake, cells were incubated with ICG (1 mg/ml) in basal medium for 1 h at 37 °C, and then in fresh medium.

Transplantation of hepatocytes into NOD/SCID mice

Four-week-old NOD/SCID mice were treated with retrosine (70 mg/kg, 4 weeks and 2 weeks before transplantation) and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, 0.5 ml/kg, 24 h before transplantation). A total of 4.2 × 107/kg hepatocytes were transplanted through splenic injection. Plasma samples were collected to detect hFIX antigen every 2 weeks after transplantation, and mice liver tissues were obtained for human ALB detection by immunohistochemistry according to general protocols.

hFIX antigen assay

The assay of hFIX antigen in cell culture supernatant and plasma of NOD/SCID mice was carried out using the human Factor IX ELISA kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

hFIX activity assay

To analyze hFIX activity, Coagulation Factor IX Deficient Plasma (Siemens, Newark, DE, USA) and an Automatic Coagulation Analyzer (Sysmex CS-5100; Sysmex Kobe, Japan) were used to examine the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), which was compared with the calibration curve of standard plasma for calculating the hFIX content. The measurement was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and a reference curve was constructed using serial dilutions of standard human plasma (Siemens).

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SEM and were compared by Student’s t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Generation of patient-specific iPSCs from PBMNCs

We collected PBMNCs of an 11-year-old male HB patient from China, with a known F9 gene mutation: c.676C > T, p.Arg226Trp. As described previously [22], isolated PBMNCs were cultured in erythroid culture medium for 6 days, and then transfected with integration-free episomal plasmids. After 7-day culture in iPSC generation medium, small iPSC colonies were observed, which were then cultured in Essential 8 medium (Fig. 1a). When iPSC colonies grew large enough, cells were removed, cultured in Essential 8 medium on Matrigel-coated plates, and passaged into small pieces using 0.5 mM EDTA (Fig. 1b). After 10 passages, karyotype and pluripotency detection were carried out. The karyotype was normal (Fig. 1c), with 22 pairs of autosomes and a pair of sex chromosomes. qRT-PCR (Fig. 1d) and immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 1e) showed expression of pluripotent markers, including OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, TRA-1-60, and SSEA4. iPSCs produced teratomas containing multiple derivatives of three germ layers after being injected into NOD/SCID mice (Fig. 1f). The iPSCs were sequenced to ensure the existence of mutation c.676C > T (Additional file 3: Figure S1a).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Generation and characterization of patient-specific iPSCs from PBMNCs. a Schematic of patient-specific iPSC generation from PBMNCs. b Small iPSC-like colonies appeared 7 days after electroporation. At 14 days after electroporation, iPSC colonies grew big enough for picking out. After being picked out, iPSCs were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates without feeder. c Karyotype of iPSCs was normal. d qRT-PCR analysis showed expression of OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG of iPSCs (n = 3 independent experiments for each sample). PBMNCs from patient used as negative control, H1 embryonic stem cells used as positive control. e Immunofluorescence staining showed expression of TRA-1-60, SSEA4, OCT4, and NANOG. f Sections of teratomas stained with H&E (endoderm: bronchus; mesoderm: cartilage; ectoderm: epidermis). All scale bars represent 100 μm. PBMNC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, iPSC induced pluripotent cell, D day, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, HB hemophilia B

Successful insertion of F9 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus of HEK 293 T cells and HB-iPSCs

In this study, we attempted to insert human full-length F9 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus to acquire stable expression of hFIX. Fig. 2a shows the schematic diagram of CRISPR-Cas9. Firstly, HEK 293 T cells were transfected to detect the efficiency of the plasmids. Additional file 4: Table S3 presents the dosages of plasmids and cell numbers used in the study. We observed that approximately 80% of cells were GFP-positive 24 h after transfection in the GFP group (Fig. 2b). Forty-eight hours after transfection, 2 μg/ml puromycin was used for drug selection in both groups. After three passages, the remaining cells were assayed for F9 expression in the F9 group. Insertion could be detected using primers F1, R1 and F2, R2 in the 293 T-insertion group (Fig. 2c, d). The expression of F9 in the 293 T-insertion group was notably higher than that in the 293 T-wildtype (WT) group (Fig. 2e). hFIX was also detected in the 293 T-insertion group through immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 2f). Collectively, these results demonstrated the efficiency of the plasmids.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

CRISPR-Cas9 and insertion of F9 cDNA into AAVS1 locus of HEK293T cells. a Schematic of CRISPR-Cas9. b About 80% of cells were GFP-positive 24 h after transfection in the GFP group. c Primers F1, R1 were used to detect the full fragment of insertion. In the 293 T-WT group, only a 468-bp fragment could be seen (yellow arrow); in the 293 T-insertion group, both 468-bp and 4.9-kb fragments could be seen (yellow arrow). d. Primers F2, R2 used to detect 5′ junction point of insertion. In the 293 T-WT group, nothing could be seen; in the 293 T-insertion group, a 1.3-kb fragment could be seen (yellow arrow). e qRT-PCR showed F9 expression of the 293 T-insertion group was extremely higher than that in the 293 T-WT group. AAVS1-EF1α-puromycin empty plasmid did not produce any hFIX expression (n = 3 independent experiments for each sample). f Immunofluorescence staining showed hFIX expression in the 293 T-insertion group. All scale bars represent 100 μm. CRISPR-Cas9 clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated nuclease 9, WT wildtype, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, HFIX human factor IX

To transfect HB-iPSCs, 1 × 106 iPSCs were treated with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y26732 for 4–6 h. After electroporation, the iPSCs were seeded onto feeder cells. Twenty-four hours later, sporadic GFP-positive cells could be seen in the GFP group. Forty-eight hours after transfection, 0.3 μg/ml puromycin was used for drug selection. Most iPSCs died after drug selection, but a few survived. After about 7 days, each surviving iPSC colony grew large enough for picking out in both groups (Fig. 3a, b) for further insertion detection. We picked out six colonies in total in the F9 group. As shown in Fig. 3c, using primers F2 and R2, a 1.3-kb fragment could be detected in all iPSC colonies, indicating the successful 5′ junction; using primers F1 and R1, 468-bp and 4.9-kb fragments could be seen in iPSC colonies 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, indicating heterozygous insertion of F9 cDNA; only a 4.9-kb fragment could be seen in iPSC colony 5, indicating homozygous insertion of F9 cDNA. Additional file 3: Figure S1b shows the sequencing result of F9 mutation (c.676C > T) of colony 5. The karyotype of iPSC colony 5 was normal and its pluripotency was well detected (Additional file 5: Figure S2). So, iPSC colony 5 (referred to as iPSC-insertion) was used for further hepatocytic differentiation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Insertion of F9 cDNA into AAVS1 locus of HB iPSCs. a Surviving cells grew large in the GFP group after puromycin selection. b Surviving cells (colony 5) grew large in the F9 group after puromycin selection. c Primers F2, R2 used to detect 5′ junction point of insertion. A 1.3-kb fragment could be seen in all iPSC colonies; primers F1, R1 used to detect the full fragment of insertion. The 468-bp and 4.9-kb fragments could be seen in iPSC colonies 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6; while only a 4.9-kb fragment could be seen in iPSC colony 5, there was no 468-bp fragment. GAPDH was amplified as internal control of amount of genomic DNA. A 283-bp fragment of same intensity could be seen in all iPSC colonies. All scale bars represent 100 μm. iPSC induced pluripotent cell, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Off-target effect detection in the successfully inserted iPSCs

Using Cas-OFFinder, 1799 potential off-target sites that differed from the sgRNA sequence by up to five nucleotides in the genome were found. We found 97,968 indels, 3084 structural variations (SVs), 51,628 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and 2225 copy number variations (CNVs) unique to the inserted iPSCs compared to that in the parental iPSCs. Since indels and SVs comprise virtually all of the mutations introduced by CRISPR-Cas9 [24], we focused solely on indels and SVs. Through comparison of potential off-target sites, and indels and SVs unique to the inserted iPSCs, we did not find any overlapping mutation between them (Additional file 6: Figure S3).

Functional hepatocyte differentiation of inserted iPSCs

When iPSCs acquired a confluence of 50–70%, the differentiation was performed as shown in Fig. 4a. The total differentiation process took 20 days, with days 6–15 under 4% O2. Immunofluorescence staining indicated expression of FOXA2, SOX17, and GATA4 on day 5, HNF4α on day 10, AFP on day 15, and ALB on day 20 (Fig. 4b). Flow cytometry analysis indicated that the expression of AFP and ALB was greater than 90% (Fig. 4c). Then we detected the hepatic markers at the gene level. qRT-PCR showed the expression of AFP, ALB, HNF4α, TDO2, and TAT relative to GAPDH (Fig. 4d). It was interesting to note that the marker of precursor hepatocytes (AFP) was high, whereas the markers of mature hepatocytes (ALB, TDO2, and TAT) were relatively low, indicating that the differentiated hepatocytes we obtained were still in the process of further maturing. Compared to the expression of ALB in flow cytometry (Fig. 4c), the ALB expression in qRT-PCR (Fig. 4d) was relatively low, which might be caused by the asynchrony of gene transcription and protein translation. Then we compared the expression of pluripotent markers (OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG) and hepatic markers (AFP, ALB, HNF4α, TDO2, TAT, and CYP3A4) between the undifferentiated iPSCs and the differentiated hepatocytes (referred to as iPSC-insertion-Heps) by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4e). After differentiation, the expression of pluripotent markers decreased, whereas the expression of hepatic markers increased. The differentiated cells had the function of glycogen storage (Additional file 7: Figure S4a) and ICG uptake (Additional file 7: Figure S4b). The differentiated cells also expressed LDL-receptor (Additional file 7: Figure S4c) and had the ability for LDL uptake (Additional file 7: Figure S4d).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Differentiation of iPSCs into hepatocytes and characterization of hepatocytic functions. a Schematic showing stepwise protocol for producing hepatocytes from iPSCs. b Immunofluorescence staining showed expression of SOX17, FOXA2, and GATA4 on day 5, HNF4α on day 10, AFP on day 15, and ALB on day 20. c Flow cytometry analysis showed expression of AFP and ALB > 90%. d qRT-PCR showed relative expression of HNF4α, AFP, ALB, TDO2, and TAT relative to GAPDH (n = 3 independent experiments for each sample). e Expression of pluripotent markers (OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG) and hepatic markers (AFP, ALB, HNF4α, TAT, TDO2, and CYP3A4) between iPSC-insertion and iPSC-insertion-Heps compared by qRT-PCR (n = 3 independent experiments for each sample). After differentiation, expression of pluripotent markers decreased, while expression of hepatic markers increased. All scale bars represent 100 μm. BMP bone morphogenetic protein, bFGF basic fibroblast growth factor, iPSC induced pluripotent cell, HGF, hepatocyte growth factor, DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, ALB albumin, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

F9 expression, and hFIX antigen levels and activity in the supernatant medium

We compared F9 expression between iPSC-insertion-Heps and differentiated hepatocytes from the patient’s uninserted iPSCs (referred to as iPSC-parental-Heps) by qRT-PCR (Fig. 5a). qRT-PCR indicated that F9 expression in iPSC-insertion-Heps was notably higher than that in the other two groups. hFIX antigen in cell culture supernatant of iPSC-insertion-Heps was higher than that in iPSC-parental-Heps (44.357 ± 4.035 ng/ml vs 1.575 ± 0.004 ng/ml, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 5b) at the end of the 20th day. hFIX activity in cell culture supernatant of iPSC-insertion-Heps was also higher than that in iPSC-parental-Heps (5.038 ± 0.296% vs 1.725 ± 0.103%, P = 0.0084) (Fig. 5c).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Comparison of F9 expression, and hFIX antigen levels and activity between iPSC-parental-Heps and iPSC-insertion-Heps. a qRT-PCR showed F9 expression in undifferentiated iPSCs, iPSC-parental-Heps, and iPSC-insertion-Heps (n = 3 independent experiments for each sample). b Comparison of hFIX antigen levels in cell culture supernatant between iPSC-parental-Heps and iPSC-insertion-Heps. Student’s t test used. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 8 in iPSC-parental-Heps group, n = 9 in iPSC-insertion-Heps group). c Comparison of hFIX activity in cell culture supernatant between iPSC-parental-Heps and iPSC-insertion-Heps. Student’s t test used. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 4 in iPSC-parental-Heps group, n = 8 in iPSC-insertion-Heps group). d Two weeks after transplantation, hFIX antigen levels in mice plasma of the iPSC-insertion-Heps group, iPSC-parental-Heps group, and control group detected by ELISA. Student’s t test used. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 5 in iPSC-insertion-Heps group and the control group, n = 4 in iPSC-parental-Heps group). e Two weeks after transplantation, human ALB was detected in mice #1, #2, #4, and #5 of the iPSC-insertion-Heps group by immunohistochemistry. All scale bars represent 50 μm. GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, iPSC induced pluripotent cell, hFIX human factor IX, DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, ALB albumin

Implanting ability of the differentiated hepatocytes

Fifteen NOD/SCID mice were divided randomly into three equal groups. iPSC-insertion-Heps were injected into the first group, iPSC-parental-Heps were injected into the second group, and 100 μl basic Hepatocyte Culture medium (Lonza) was injected into the third group as control. Two weeks after transplantation, only one mouse in the iPSC-parental-Heps group died, and all of the others survived. We detected hFIX antigen in mice plasma by ELISA (Fig. 5d). hFIX antigen levels in the iPSC-insertion-Heps group was higher than that in the iPSC-parental-Heps group (4.998 ± 1.703 ng/ml vs 1.178 ± 0.076 ng/ml, P = 0.0159) and in the control group (4.998 ± 3.808 ng/ml vs 0.789 ± 0.003 ng/ml, P = 0.0079). hFIX antigen levels in the iPSC-parental-Heps group was higher than that in the control group (1.178 ± 0.076 ng/ml vs 0.789 ± 0.003 ng/ml, P = 0.0159). We then detected human ALB in four mice of the iPSC-insertion-Heps group by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5e).

Discussion

iPSCs possess self-renewal ability and multilineage differentiation potential similar to embryonic stem cells, and are not constrained by traditional ethical issues, providing potentially revolutionary approaches in personalized cell therapy, disease modeling, and drug screening [25, 26]. Conventionally, human iPSCs were generated from skin fibroblasts. Being a hemorrhagic disease, hemophilia is not suitable for this invasive operation. As a result, previous studies generated iPSCs of hemophilia patients from urine cells [2729]. PBMNCs have been reported as the best cell source for cell reprogramming owing to their better quality, quantity, and easy accessibility [3034]. Therefore, we generated iPSCs of HB patients from PBMNCs in this study.

The development of genetic engineering tools opens up many opportunities for the treatment of human hereditary diseases. Notably, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is the most powerful homologous recombination-based gene editing method, and has been used in human studies of beta-thalassemia, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease [3538]. CRISPR-Cas9 has been used in hemophilia to correct structural variations and chromosomal inversions of HA patients [29, 39] and somatic mutations of HB mice [40]. A previous study suggested that GC-rich sgRNAs improved targeting efficiency, whereas poly(U) stretches close to the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence were associated with sgRNAs of lower efficiency [41]. When designing sgRNAs for in-situ correction, one has to constrain the sgRNA sequences around the mutant nucleotides, which runs the risk of constructing sgRNAs with lower targeting efficiency. In this study, we used a sgRNA with high efficiency to target the AAVS1 locus and a donor plasmid carrying human full-length F9 cDNA, and then these plasmids could be applied to all HB patients regardless of their mutation type, eliminating the trouble of constructing sgRNAs with lower targeting efficiency. This approach is particularly suitable for HA, as there are already 2015 different mutations documented in the Factor VIII Gene (F8) Variant Database (http://www.factorviii-db.org/) [42], which makes it quite difficult to generate sgRNAs with high efficiency when performing in-situ correction. Thus, in our future studies we will aim to knock-in human full-length F8 cDNA or B domain-deleted (BDD) F8 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus of iPSCs from HA patients.

Before transfecting the iPSCs, HEK293T cells were transfected firstly to test the knock-in efficiency of plasmids. HEK293T cells are used to check the cutting efficiency of sgRNAs generally [43], because HEK293T cells are easy to transfect. But the epigenome state and genome sequences of HEK293T cells are different from primary hepatocytes. High efficiency of sgRNAs in HEK293T cells does not mean high efficiency in primary hepatocytes. So primary hepatocytes with F9 mutation or a F9 knockout transformed cell line were better choices to detect the effect of plasmids in our further study.

A problem that cannot be ignored in CRISPR-Cas9 is off-target effects. Previous studies have shown that mismatches with 20 nucleotides of sgRNAs can be tolerated, leading to genome editing at undesired sites [4447]. However, the off-target incidence is lower in pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) [24, 29, 43], which is consistent with lower knock-out and knock-in efficiency of sgRNAs in PSCs [48]. CRISPR-Cas9 can induce mutations at sites that differ by as many as five nucleotides from the intended 20 nucleotides [44]. Therefore, in this study, we compared potential off-target sites that differed from the sgRNA sequence by up to five nucleotides in the genome with indels and SVs unique to the inserted iPSCs, and found no overlapping mutations. As a result, no off-target mutations were found in our study.

In our research, hepatocytes differentiated from human iPSCs should be transplanted to immunodeficient mice or hemophilia mice treated with immune-suppression drugs. Since there are no immunodeficient hemophilic mice models available, we transplanted the differentiated hepatocytes into NOD/SCID mice instead. The Automatic Coagulation Analyzer (Sysmex CS-5100) we used to detect the hFIX activity could not distinguish between human FIX and mouse FIX, so we did not detect hFIX activity, but instead assayed the hFIX antigen by ELISA. hFIX antigen could be detected only 2 weeks after transplantation, and could no longer be detected after 4 weeks or later in all the groups. It was possible that newly regenerated mice hepatocytes rejected the transplanted human hepatocytes. Better ways to improve implanting efficiency should be further explored. Considering that human and NOD/SCID mice are two different species, human cells cannot transplant into NOD/SCID mice thoroughly. So it may make sense that the FIX levels in mice plasma seem to be much lower in our research. However, the situation may be completely different when human cells are retransfused into the human body where they came from, because there is no immunological rejection.

Conclusions

We generated HB patient-specific iPSCs from PBMNCs with normal karyotype and good pluripotency. PBMNCs are better somatic cell choices for generating iPSCs from hemophilia patients. Although the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 in PSCs is relatively low, we successfully knocked the human full-length F9 cDNA into the AAVS1 locus of the iPSCs without off-target effects. Therefore, it is of far-reaching significance to construct sgRNAs with high efficiency, especially when they are used in PSCs. In addition, CRISPR-Cas9 is relatively safe to be used in PSCs, considering the low off-target effects. The differentiated hepatocytes from inserted iPSCs could secrete hFIX stably and were able to be transplanted into the NOD/SCID mice in the short term, which showed great promise for further exploration of in-vivo research. In summary, by combining the iPSC technique with the CRISPR-Cas9 system, we provide a new approach for clinical gene therapy for hemophilia.

Abbreviations

AFP: 

Alpha-fetoprotein;

ALB: 

Albumin;

APTT: 

Activated partial thrombo-plastin time;

CCl4

Carbon tetrachloride;

CNVs: 

Copy number variations;

CRISPR-Cas9: 

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-–CRISPR associated nuclease 9;

DAPI: 

4′

6-Ddiamidino-2-phenylindole;

DSB: 

DNA double-strand breaks;

H&E: 

Hematoxylin and eosin;

HA: 

Hemophilia A;

HB: 

Hemophilia B;

HDR: 

Homology-directed repair;

ICG: 

Indocyanine green;

iPSC: 

Induced pluripotent stem cell;

LDL: 

Low-density lipoprotein;

NOD/SCID: 

Non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency disease;

PAM: 

Protospacer-adjacent motif;

PAS: 

Periodic Acid-–Schiff;

PBMNCs: 

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells;

PSCs: 

Pluripotent stem cells;

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative real-time PCR;

sgRNA: 

Single guide RNA;

SNPs: 

Single nucleotide polymorphisms;

SVs: 

Structural variations;

TALENs: 

Transcription activator-like effector nucleases;

TAT: 

Tyrosine- alpha-testosterone;

TDO2: 

Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase;

ZFNs: 

Zinc finger nucleases

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81470302, 81421002, 81730006, 81400134, 81400152), Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission Grant (15JCZDJC35800), CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (2016-I2M-1-018, 2016-I2M-1-017, 2016GH3100001), Novo Nordisk Hemophilia Research Fund, and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFA0100600).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Authors’ contributions

CcL, JS, HhG,  RfF, LyZ, and HyL were responsible for reprogramming and cell transfection. CcL, JS, RW, JpZ, and WL participated in the hepatic differentiation and animal experiments. FX and XfL were responsible for WGS and data analysis. XbZ provided the plasmids for reprogramming. CcL, LZ, TC, and RcY contributed to data analysis and manuscript writing. LZ conceived the idea, designed the experiments, and provided administrative support and final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

LZ is a member of the hemostasis and thrombosis group of Chinese Medical Association Hematology and a Chinese editorial board of Haemophilia, an official journal of the World Federation of hemophilia. For many years he engaged in the research of hemophilia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and essential thrombocythemia (ET), including clinical work and basis study. He is also involved in a variety of stem cell research, including stem cell engineering, industrial platform construction, the establishment of stem cell separation, efficient amplification, frozen storage and recovery, and large-scale production of cellular products.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Hematology and Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, informed consent was obtained from the participant and his legal guardians, and ethics approval for NOD/SCID mice was obtained.

Consent for publication

The participant and his legal guardians declare their support for the publication and its contents.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy of Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology and Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 288 Nanjing Road, Tianjin, 300020, China
(2)
Department of Hematology, The First Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin, 300192, China
(3)
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China
(4)
Division of Regenerative Medicine MC1528B, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA

References

  1. Nienhuis AW, Nathwani AC, Davidoff AM. Gene therapy for hemophilia. Mol Ther. 2017;25(5):1163–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nathwani AC, Reiss UM, Tuddenham EG, Rosales C, Chowdary P, McIntosh J, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of factor IX gene therapy in hemophilia B. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(21):1994–2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339(6121):823–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339(6121):819–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Xue HY, Ji LJ, Gao AM, Liu P, He JD, Lu XJ. CRISPR-Cas9 for medical genetic screens: applications and future perspectives. J Med Genet. 2016;53(2):91–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bara AM, Messana A, Herring A, Hazelbaker DZ, Eggan K, Barrett LE. Generation of a TLE3 heterozygous knockout human embryonic stem cell line using CRISPR-Cas9. Stem Cell Res. 2016;17(2):441–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Latella MC, Di Salvo MT, Cocchiarella F, Benati D, Grisendi G, Comitato A, et al. In vivo editing of the human mutant rhodopsin gene by electroporation of plasmid-based CRISPR/Cas9 in the mouse retina. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2016;5(11):e389.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Enkler L, Richer D, Marchand AL, Ferrandon D, Jossinet F. Genome engineering in the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35766.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Citorik RJ, Mimee M, Lu TK. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(11):1141–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ogata T, Kozuka T, Kanda T. Identification of an insulator in AAVS1, a preferred region for integration of adeno-associated virus DNA. J Virol. 2003;77(16):9000–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hockemeyer D, Soldner F, Beard C, Gao Q, Mitalipova M, DeKelver RC, et al. Efficient targeting of expressed and silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(9):851–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Lombardo A, Cesana D, Genovese P, Di Stefano B, Provasi E, Colombo DF, et al. Site-specific integration and tailoring of cassette design for sustainable gene transfer. Nat Methods. 2011;8(10):861–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. DeKelver RC, Choi VM, Moehle EA, Paschon DE, Hockemeyer D, Meijsing SH, et al. Functional genomics, proteomics, and regulatory DNA analysis in isogenic settings using zinc finger nuclease-driven transgenesis into a safe harbor locus in the human genome. Genome Res. 2010;20(8):1133–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Qian K, Huang CT, Chen H, Blackbourn LW, Chen Y, Cao J, et al. A simple and efficient system for regulating gene expression in human pluripotent stem cells and derivatives. Stem Cells. 2014;32(5):1230–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Holkers M, Maggio I, Liu J, Janssen JM, Miselli F, Mussolino C, et al. Differential integrity of TALE nuclease genes following adenoviral and lentiviral vector gene transfer into human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(5):e63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mussolino C, Alzubi J, Fine EJ, Morbitzer R, Cradick TJ, Lahaye T, et al. TALENs facilitate targeted genome editing in human cells with high specificity and low cytotoxicity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(10):6762–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo Y, Liu C, Cerbini T, San H, Lin Y, Chen G, et al. Stable enhanced green fluorescent protein expression after differentiation and transplantation of reporter human induced pluripotent stem cells generated by AAVS1 transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(7):821–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith C, Gore A, Yan W, Abalde-Atristain L, Li Z, He C, et al. Whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals high specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN-based genome editing in human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(1):12–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Oceguera-Yanez F, Kim SI, Matsumoto T, Tan GW, Xiang L, Hatani T, et al. Engineering the AAVS1 locus for consistent and scalable transgene expression in human iPSCs and their differentiated derivatives. Methods. 2016;101:43–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Su RJ, Neises A, Zhang XB. Generation of iPS cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells using episomal vectors. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1357:57–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Si-Tayeb K, Noto FK, Nagaoka M, Li J, Battle MA, Duris C, et al. Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):297–305.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Veres A, Gosis BS, Ding Q, Collins R, Ragavendran A, Brand H, et al. Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(1):27–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Cherry AB, Daley GQ. Reprogrammed cells for disease modeling and regenerative medicine. Annu Rev Med. 2013;64:277–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Trounson A, DeWitt ND. Pluripotent stem cells progressing to the clinic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(3):194–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jia B, Chen S, Zhao Z, Liu P, Cai J, Qin D, et al. Modeling of hemophilia A using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells derived from urine cells. Life Sci. 2014;108(1):22–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pang J, Wu Y, Li Z, Hu Z, Wang X, Hu X, et al. Targeting of the human F8 at the multicopy rDNA locus in hemophilia A patient-derived iPSCs using TALENickases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;472(1):144–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Park CY, Kim DH, Son JS, Sung JJ, Lee J, Bae S, et al. Functional correction of large factor VIII gene chromosomal inversions in hemophilia A patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(2):213–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Staerk J, Dawlaty MM, Gao Q, Maetzel D, Hanna J, Sommer CA, et al. Reprogramming of human peripheral blood cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7(1):20–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang XB. Cellular reprogramming of human peripheral blood cells. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2013;11(5):264–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Chou BK, Mali P, Huang X, Ye Z, Dowey SN, Resar LM, et al. Efficient human iPS cell derivation by a non-integrating plasmid from blood cells with unique epigenetic and gene expression signatures. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):518–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. DeRosa BA, Van Baaren JM, Dubey GK, Lee JM, Cuccaro ML, Vance JM, et al. Derivation of autism spectrum disorder-specific induced pluripotent stem cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Neurosci Lett. 2012;516(1):9–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Okita K, Yamakawa T, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Amano N, Watanabe A, et al. An efficient nonviral method to generate integration-free human-induced pluripotent stem cells from cord blood and peripheral blood cells. Stem Cells. 2013;31(3):458–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Song B, Fan Y, He W, Zhu D, Niu X, Wang D, et al. Improved hematopoietic differentiation efficiency of gene-corrected beta-thalassemia induced pluripotent stem cells by CRISPR/Cas9 system. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(9):1053–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Xie F, Ye L, Chang JC, Beyer AI, Wang J, Muench MO, et al. Seamless gene correction of beta-thalassemia mutations in patient-specific iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9 and piggyBac. Genome Res. 2014;24(9):1526–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwank G, Koo BK, Sasselli V, Dekkers JF, Heo I, Demircan T, et al. Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13(6):653–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang X, Wang Y, Yan W, Smith C, Ye Z, Wang J, et al. Production of gene-corrected adult beta globin protein in human erythrocytes differentiated from patient iPSCs after genome editing of the sickle point mutation. Stem Cells. 2015;33(5):1470–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Park CY, Sung JJ, Choi SH, Lee DR, Park IH, Kim DW. Modeling and correction of structural variations in patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(11):2154–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Guan Y, Ma Y, Li Q, Sun Z, Ma L, Wu L, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic correction of a novel coagulator factor IX gene mutation ameliorates hemophilia in mouse. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(5):477–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM, Lander ES. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science. 2014;343(6166):80–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyu C, Xue F, Liu X, Liu W, Fu R, Sun T, et al. Identification of mutations in the F8 and F9 gene in families with haemophilia using targeted high-throughput sequencing. Haemophilia. 2016;22(5):e427–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang JP, Li XL, Neises A, Chen W, Hu LP, Ji GZ, et al. Different effects of sgRNA length on CRISPR-mediated gene knockout efficiency. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28566.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK, et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):822–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Pattanayak V, Lin S, Guilinger JP, Ma E, Doudna JA, Liu DR. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):839–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuscu C, Arslan S, Singh R, Thorpe J, Adli M. Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(7):677–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):827–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Lin S, Staahl BT, Alla RK, Doudna JA. Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. elife. 2014;3:e04766.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement