Skip to main content
Download PDF

Bioluminescence imaging visualizes osteopontin-induced neurogenesis and neuroblast migration in the mouse brain after stroke

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 9, Article number: 182 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Osteopontin (OPN), an acidic phosphoglycoprotein, is upregulated in the brain after cerebral ischemia. We previously reported that OPN supports migration, survival, and proliferation of neural stem cells (NSC) in primary cell culture, as well as their differentiation into neurons. We here analyzed the effects of OPN on neuroblasts in vivo in the context of cerebral ischemia.

Methods

Transgenic mice expressing luciferase under the control of the neuroblast-specific doublecortin (DCX)-promoter, allowing visualization of neuroblasts in vivo using bioluminescence imaging (BLI), were injected with OPN intracerebroventricularly while control mice were injected with vehicle buffer. To assess the effects of OPN after ischemia, additional mice were subjected to photothrombosis and injected with either OPN or vehicle.

Results

OPN enhanced the migration of neuroblasts both in the healthy brain and after ischemia, as quantified by BLI in vivo. Moreover, the number of neural progenitors was increased following OPN treatment, with the maximum effect on the second day after OPN injection into the healthy brain, and 14 days after OPN injection following ischemia. After ischemia, OPN quantitatively promoted the endogenous, ischemia-induced neuroblast expansion, and additionally recruited progenitors from the contralateral hemisphere.

Conclusions

Our results strongly suggest that OPN constitutes a promising substance for the targeted activation of neurogenesis in ischemic stroke.

Background

Osteopontin (OPN) is an acidic phosphoglycoprotein of about 41,500 Da that was first described as being secreted by transformed cells isolated from bone [1, 2]. Nowadays, OPN is known to be expressed in response to injury, stress, and inflammation in many types of cells such as osteoclasts, hepatocytes, vascular smooth muscle cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, and activated T cells [2,3,4,5,6,7]. As a ubiquitously expressed protein, OPN is involved in homeostasis, angiogenesis, wound healing, and also immune responses [8,9,10,11]. In the brain, OPN is expressed constitutively and upregulated after cerebral ischemia [12, 13]. In the subacute stage of cerebral ischemia, OPN is upregulated in microglia and macrophages within the infarct core and in peri-infarct regions [11, 14, 15]. After ischemic stroke, OPN shows two distinct beneficial effects: a direct neuroprotective effect on neurons [16, 17], and an indirect neuroprotective effect via blockade of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), resulting in the reduction of secondary tissue damage [18].

OPN acts as a potent chemoattractant. It therefore promotes migration of mesenchymal stem cells [19], endothelial cells [20], macrophages [21], and hematopoietic stem cells [22]. Within the central nervous system (CNS), Yan et al. were the first to associate a lack of OPN after intracerebral hemorrhage or ischemia with a significant decrease in neuroblast migration [23, 24]. We recently reported that OPN supports not only the migration of neural stem cells (NSC) in monolayer culture, but also their survival under stressful conditions, their proliferation, and their differentiation into neurons. These effects were in part mediated via the CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), thus unraveling a new molecular mechanism of the putative action of OPN on NSC [25]. Based on these in-vitro data, we hypothesized that OPN would possess similar effects in vivo, particularly in the context of cerebral ischemia.

The DCX-luc transgenic mouse expresses the firefly luciferase (luc) under the control of the doublecortin (DCX) promoter, allowing for the noninvasive visualization of DCX-positive neuroblasts in the brain in vivo using bioluminescence imaging (BLI) [26]. Thus, we here aimed to establish and visualize the effects of OPN in a longitudinal study under physiological conditions as well as after cerebral ischemia in vivo using BLI.

Methods

Animals and surgery

All animal procedures followed the German laws for animal protection and were approved by the local animal care committee as well as local governmental authorities (Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz North Rhine-Westphalia, LANUV). Results are reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments). To exclude putative influences of hormonal changes on the findings, we used only male mice. For surgery (photothrombosis (PT) or injections of osteopontin or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), respectively), 46 DCX-luc transgenic mice expressing a firefly luciferase in DCX+ cells with C57/Bl6 albino background (B6(Cg)-Tyrc-2 J/J; Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria), aged 7–9 weeks old, weighing 20–25 g, were anesthetized with 4% isoflurane via a face mask as well as local, subcutaneous bupivacaine hydrochloride injections. Anesthesia was maintained with 2–4% isoflurane in a 65%/35% nitrous oxide/oxygen atmosphere. Throughout the surgical procedures, a thermostatically controlled heating pad maintained the body temperature at 37.0 °C. After surgery, the mice were transferred to a heated recovery box to recover from anesthesia. Mice were put back into their individually ventilated home cages under 12 h light/12 h darkness cycle, and water and food were provided ad libitum.

Photothrombosis

In one group of DCX-luc transgenic mice (n = 27), focal cerebral ischemia was induced by PT as described previously [27]. In brief, animals were anesthetized, placed in a stereotactic frame, and an approximately 3-mm long, median incision of the skin between the caudal ends of the ears was made. The periost was removed, and bregma and lambda points were identified. Protected from light, the photosensitive dye Rose bengal (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) was dissolved in sterile 1% PBS at a concentration of 10 mg/ml, and 0.1 ml was injected intraperitoneally 5 min before illumination. A fiberoptic bundle of an LED light source (Zeiss CL6000 LED, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 50-mm aperture was centered using a micromanipulator at 1.8 mm laterally and 2.5 mm posterior from the bregma as close as possible to the skull. The mouse brain was illuminated through the intact skull for 15 min starting 5 min after intraperitoneal injection of Rose bengal. Afterwards, the skin was closed with sutures and the animals were transferred to a heated recovery box before moving them back to the home cage; 19 control mice did not undergo this PT procedure.

OPN treatment

Animals were treated with a single intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of 0.6 μg OPN (recombinant mouse, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) in 3 μl sterile 1% PBS to allow the assessment of the effects of OPN on the migration of neuroblasts in vivo. OPN treatment was performed in eight healthy (naive) mice, and in 14 stroke mice on the day after induction of PT. The respective control groups received an i.c.v. injection of 3 μl sterile 1% PBS (vehicle) alone (naive n = 8; stroke n = 13), with assignment to the treatment or control group being performed by randomization. Another control group of three mice was subjected only to the skull damage associated with treatment without the i.c.v. injection itself, by simply drilling a borehole over the lateral ventricle (for an overview of the experimental groups, see Table 1). To localize the lateral ventricle in individual mice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were used for a precise localization, as described below. Based on MRI data, the i.c.v. injection was performed using a micromanipulator at the following coordinate ranges from the bregma: 1.2–1.4 mm ML, 0.2–0.4 mm AP, 2.6–3.0 VD.

Table 1 Overview of the experimental groups
Full size table

Labeling of proliferating cells

To label proliferating cells in vivo, the tracer bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was injected intraperitoneally into selected animals (naive n = 8; stroke n = 12). Injections were started immediately after i.c.v. injections of OPN or vehicle, respectively, and repeated twice, after 12 and 24 h. BrdU was injected at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight per injection, resulting in a cumulative dose of 150 mg/kg body weight BrdU per animal.

MRI protocol

In all mice, MRI was performed directly before i.c.v. injection of OPN or vehicle, respectively, to localize the lateral ventricles precisely and to characterize the extent of the ischemic lesion in animals with photothrombotic stroke. Animals were anesthetized with 4% isoflurane. Anesthesia was maintained with 2–4% isoflurane in a 65%/35% nitrous oxide/oxygen atmosphere. To monitor physiological parameters during MRI, an MR compatible monitoring system (Small Animal Instruments Inc., NY, USA) was employed and connected to a custom-made data acquisition program based on DASYLab (measX, Mönchengladbach, Germany). A fiberoptic temperature probe and a respiration pad were used to collect data concerning body temperature and respiratory rate as well as their corresponding waveforms. A thermostatically controlled water flow system connected to a heating pad was employed to maintain body temperature at 37 ± 0.5 °C. All experiments were conducted on a 11.7-Tesla BioSpec system (Bruker, BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany) with a BGA9s gradient system with a maximum gradient 750 mT/m and a minimum rise time of < 250 μs. The transmission was achieved with a quadrature volume resonator (inner diameter 72 mm). A standard rat brain quadrature surface coil (~ 30 × 30 mm2 Bruker, BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany) detected the signal. The animals were positioned prone in a dedicated cradle with a stereotactic head holder and with the surface coil placed directly over their head. Twelve contiguous 1-mm thick T2-weighted coronal images of the brain were acquired (TR/TE = 3000/14 ms, 16 echoes, FOV = 3.0 cm, matrix 128 × 128), using a multislice-multiecho Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence.

BLI protocol

BLI was performed on the day before induction of photothrombosis, 2 days before i.c.v. injection of naive animals, as well as 2, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days after OPN or control treatment. For BLI, DCX-luc transgenic mice were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane in a 65%/35% nitrous oxide/oxygen atmosphere and shaved on the head as well as in the neck region. Animals were intraperitoneally injected with luciferin at 300 mg/kg body weight (d-luciferin in potassium salt 99%, Synchem, Altenburg, Germany), leading to its oxidization by luciferase active under the DCX promoter, therefore causing light emission from neuroblasts. One to three minutes after luciferin injection, images were acquired every minute for 30 min in total, using an IVIS Spectrum CT system (Perkin Elmer, Massachusetts, USA), measuring average radiance of photons/second/cm2/steradian (p/s/cm2/sr), or total flux in photons/second, respectively (p/s). During the 30 min of acquisition, animals were placed on a 37 °C controlled heating pad with isoflurane levels between 2 and 4%.

Image analyses

MRI

MRI data from animals with ischemic lesions were analyzed using the software Vinci (Max-Planck-Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany). Adjusted ellipsoid volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed to cover the infarct zone and to measure the infarct volume in mm3 1 day after PT.

BLI

An investigator blinded to the treatment group (RR) analyzed the BLI data using the Living Image 4.4 (Caliper Life Sciences, Massachusetts, USA). Size-constant regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on the ipsi- (right; infarct lesion) and contralesional (left) hemisphere of the head measuring total flux in p/s. To eliminate intra- and interindividual variations of total flux, the ratio between the right and left hemisphere was calculated for each animal individually. To analyze the migration of the hotspot of DCX-labeled cells, BLI images of each time point and animal with the maximum of total flux were identified using Living Image 4.4 (Caliper Life Sciences, Massachusetts, USA). For each animal and each time point, an individualized scale was set to visualize the hotspot. Using the software ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA), the respective hotspot was encircled, and the center of the circle was marked. To determine any migration of the hotspot, the distance from the middle of the circle to the midline was measured in mm.

Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemical workup at different time points, a few animals were sacrificed at earlier time points (n = 2 naive mice each after 2 and 7 days; n = 2 stroke mice each after 2, 7, and 14 days). All remaining animals were sacrificed 1 day after the last BLI session on day 28. Mice were deeply anesthetized with ketamine (0.1 mg/kg) and xylazine (0.01 mg/kg) and perfused with a fixation solution of 4% paraformaldehyde. The brains were rapidly removed, frozen in 2-methylbutane, and stored at −80 °C before histological and immunohistochemical processing. Coronal brain sections (slice thickness 10 μm) were cut and stained with polyclonal anti-doublecortin (DCX) to label neuroblasts and young neurons (dilution 1:800, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, USA, cat. no. sc-8066; or dilution 1:1.500, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, cat. no. ab18723) and monoclonal rat anti-BRDU to label proliferating cells (dilution 1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom, cat. no. ab6326). For BRDU staining, DNA hydrolysis was performed by incubation in 1 M HCL for 10 min at 37 °C. Sections were counterstained with Hoechst to label all nuclei (Hoechst 33,342, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). A fluorescent-labeled secondary antibody was used for visualization (dilution 1:500, Alexa-Fluor −488 and −568, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Additionally, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption was visualized by incubation with a biotinylated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody alone (dilution 1:100, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA). For visualization, the ABC Elite kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA), with diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) as the final reaction product, was used.

Representative pictures were taken with an inverted fluorescence phase-contrast microscope (Keyence BZ-9000E, Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The size of the subventricular zone (SVZ) as the major neurogenic niche was determined for each animal by measuring the area covered by DCX-positive cells, as described previously [28].

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics and Student’s t tests were performed with Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp.). For comparison of multiple groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-HSD as a post-hoc test for data that conformed to the assumption of homogeneity of variance, and Games-Howell for data that did not fit to the assumption of homogeneity of variance, was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 for Windows (International Business Machines Corporation IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Statistical significance was set at less than 5% level (p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA results were stated as the F-ratio: F (degrees of freedom of the between group, degrees of freedom of the within group) = F-ratio.

Results

OPN enhances the directed migration of neuroblasts

DCX-luc transgenic mice were treated with a single injection of OPN into the right lateral ventricle for the assessment of the effect of OPN on DCX+ neuroblasts in the healthy (naive) brain. Control groups received either an i.c.v. injection of vehicle (PBS) or a borehole over the right lateral ventricle only (see Table 1). The treatment effect on neuroblast migration towards the site of injection/manipulation was visualized via BLI, measuring the distance from the midline to the ‘hotspot’ of maximal BLI signal (Fig. 1a). Baseline imaging data acquired before treatment depicted the maximal BLI signal close to the midline in all three groups (p = 0.942; Fig. 1b). Between days 2 and 21 after injection of OPN into the right lateral ventricle, the BLI signal was observed at significantly greater distance to the midline than under control conditions, suggesting that OPN directly triggers migration of neuroblasts (OPN vs. PBS: day 2 F(2,27) = 51.87, p < 0.01; day 7 F(2,27) = 83.11, p < 0.001; day 10 F(2,27) = 9.82, p < 0.01; day 14 F(2,27) = 15.45, p < 0.01; day 21 F(2,27) = 6.6, p < 0.05; OPN vs. borehole: day 2 F(2,27) = 51.87, p < 0.01; day 7 F(2,27) = 83.11, p < 0.001; day 10 F(2,27) = 9.82, p < 0.01; day 21 F(2,27) = 15.45, p < 0.01; Fig. 1b, c). After 28 days, maximal BLI signal was observed in the contralateral hemisphere for all three groups of mice, with the hotspot closest to the midline in OPN animals (F(2,27) = 5.03, p < 0.05; Fig. 1c). Between the two control groups (PBS injection vs. borehole only) there was no significant difference over the period of 28 days (day 2, p = 0.128; day 7, p = 0.527; day 10, p = 0.785; day 14, p = 0.795; day 21, p = 0.892; day, 28 p = 0.441), suggesting that the effect seen with OPN was specific and not due to any type of manipulation (Fig. 1b, c). To assess the absolute distance of neuroblast migration, the distance between the baseline signal and the maximal signal 7 days after treatment was measured for each group of differently treated mice. The distance covered by neuroblasts in OPN-injected mice was significantly longer than that in either control group (F(2,27) = 59.97, p < 0.001; Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Osteopontin (OPN) enhances migration of neuroblasts in the healthy (naive) brain. OPN was applied at 0.6 μl in phosphate-buffered saline 1% (PBS) via a single intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection into the brains of healthy mice; injection of PBS alone as vehicle served as control. A second control group only received a borehole to the skull without i.c.v. injection. a Representative image of a mouse head with doublecortin-positive (DCX+) neuroblasts visualized as a ‘hotspot’ (red) using bioluminescence imaging (BLI). The arrow marks the distance between the midline and the maximal BLI signal (hotspot), thereby measuring the length of lateral migration of neuroblasts. b Representative images of neuroblast migration in a healthy PBS-injected (left) and a healthy OPN-injected mouse (right) before (baseline) and at various time points after treatment. In the OPN-treated animal, the ‘hotspot’ of maximal BLI signal lateralized to the right hemisphere between day (D)2 and D14, while no lateralization was observed in the control mouse. Note that for better visualization of the location of the ‘hotspots’, different scales were used for the left and right panels. c Quantification of the distance of migration revealed that at baseline (i.e., before any treatment) the maximal BLI signal was localized very close to the midline. Between D2 and D21 after injection of OPN into the right lateral ventricle, the distance of the maximal BLI signal to the midline was significantly increased, indicating migration of neuroblasts towards the injection site of OPN. Both control groups (PBS injection and borehole only) did not display significant movement of the BLI signal towards the manipulated hemisphere (means ± SEM; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). d To judge the absolute distance of neuroblast migration, the distance between the baseline signal and the signal 7 days after treatment was measured for each group of differently treated mice. The distance covered by neuroblasts in OPN-injected mice was significantly greater than that in PBS-injected animals or those with a borehole only (means ± SEM; ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

OPN expands neuroblast numbers

To assess the effect of OPN on the extent of neurogenesis, BLI was used to quantify the emission of photons emanating from DCX+ neuroblasts in DCX-luc mice, measured as total flux (p/s). Data are expressed as a ratio between the right (injected) and the left (contralateral) hemisphere (Fig. 2a). Two days after injection of OPN into the right lateral ventricle, the total flux ratio was already increased in OPN-treated mice compared with PBS-injected controls, suggesting an expansion of DCX+ neuroblasts in the ipsilateral hemisphere (F(1,22) = 16.28, p < 0.01; Fig. 2a, b). Ex vivo, DCX+ neuroblasts were immunohistochemically identified in the SVZ as one of the main neurogenic stem cell niches in the mammalian brain (Fig. 2c). Injection of OPN into the lateral ventricle significantly induced an expansion of neuroblasts in the SVZ 28 days after OPN treatment (F(3,86) = 28.7; p < 0.001). This effect was more pronounced in the SVZ ipsilateral to injection compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.01; Fig. 2d). Likewise, a similar result of an OPN-induced expansion of neuroblasts in the SVZ was already visible 2 days after OPN treatment (Fig. 2e). Moreover, OPN increased the numbers of BrdU+/DCX+ proliferating neuroblasts in the SVZ 2 days after OPN treatment (Fig. 2f).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Osteopontin (OPN) expands the number of neuroblasts in the healthy brain. Before (baseline) and at various time points after treatment, the total flux of photons was measured via bioluminescence imaging (BLI) as a surrogate for the number of doublecortin-positive (DCX+) neuroblasts. a Quantification of total flux was performed for each hemisphere and time point, as demonstrated on representative images, and a ratio was calculated between the hemispheres (the red rectangles in the baseline scan demonstrate measured ROIs of ipsi- and contralateral hemisphere). b Two days (D2) after i.c.v. injection of OPN, the ratio between right (injected) and left (contralateral) hemisphere regarding the total flux of photons was significantly higher compared with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-injected control mice, suggesting an expansion of DCX+ neuroblasts (means ± SEM; **p < 0.01). c Representative immunohistochemical images of DCX+ cells (red) costained with a nuclear marker (Hoechst; blue) in the subventricular zone (SVZ) ipsilateral to the injection. The number of DCX+ cells was increased 28 days after OPN treatment (right panels) compared with control (left panels; scale bars = 200 μm). d Twenty-eight days after injection of OPN, the area covered by DCX+ neuroblasts was significantly increased. This effect was more pronounced in the SVZ ipsilateral to injection compared with the contralateral side (means ± SEM; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). e Representative immunohistochemical images of DCX+ cells (red) costained with a nuclear marker (Hoechst; blue) in the SVZ ipsilateral to the injection. The number of DCX+ cells was increased 2 days after OPN treatment (right panel) compared with control (left panel; scale bars = 100 μm). f Representative immunohistochemical images costaining bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; green; labeling proliferating cells) and DCX (red; labeling neuroblasts) in the SVZ ipsilateral to the injection. The number of costained proliferating neuroblasts (BrdU+/DCX+) was increased 2 days after OPN treatment (right panel) compared with control (left panel; scale bars = 100 μm)

Full size image

OPN induces neuroblast migration after focal cortical ischemia

The mice were subjected to photothrombosis (PT) as a model of focal cortical ischemia to assess the effects of OPN on the migration and generation of neuroblasts after ischemic stroke. MRI 1 day after stroke verified the ischemic lesions and ensured that only mice with homogenous lesions of approximately equal size were randomized into the different treatment groups (average lesion size 27.3 ± 5.1 mm3 in OPN-treated mice, and 27.4 ± 4.2 mm3 in control animals, p = 0.989). OPN or PBS (as the vehicle for control) were then injected into the lateral ventricle ipsilateral to ischemia. Similarly to the nonischemic mice, migration of neuroblasts was quantified as the distance of the ‘hotspot’ of maximal BLI signal from the midline (Fig. 3a, see Fig. 1a). After photothrombotic stroke, a lateralization of DCX+ neuroblasts towards the ischemic hemisphere was observed during the entire period of observation, both after OPN treatment as well as after PBS injection (Fig. 3b, c). However, injection of OPN significantly enhanced this neuroblast migration between days 7 and 21 following treatment (day 7 F(1,40) = 14.67, p < 0.001; day 10 F(1,40) = 21.15, p < 0.001; day 14 F(1,40) = 8.35, p < 0.01; day 21 F(1,40) = 10.91, p < 0.01; Fig. 3c). Of note, 2 days after injection, the maximal BLI signal was localized in the contralateral hemisphere in OPN-treated mice only, potentially suggesting increased recruitment of stem cells from the contralateral SVZ (F(1,40) = 3.11, p < 0.01; Fig. 3b, c). The absolute distance covered by neuroblasts exposed to an excess of OPN by day 7 after injection was increased compared with control conditions (F(1,40) = 17.13, p < 0.001; Fig. 3d). Intriguingly, the distance of stem cell migration observed after ischemia roughly doubled the distance seen in the experimental set of naive mice (see y axis in Figs. 1c and 3c). To characterize disruption of the BBB after stroke, tissue was incubated with a biotinylated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody alone, impressively visualizing ischemia-induced BBB damage (Fig. 3e). However, the extent of BBB disruption remained unaltered by OPN treatment.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Osteopontin (OPN) induces neuroblast migration after stroke. One day after photothrombosis (PT), 0.6 μg OPN was injected into right lateral ventricle. Control groups received an injection of vehicle (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) after PT. a Representative image of a mouse head with the ‘hotspot’ of maximal bioluminescence imaging (BLI) signal over the right (i.e., lesioned) hemisphere. The arrow marks the distance between the midline and the ‘hotspot’, thereby measuring the distance of neuroblast migration from the midline. b Representative images of neuroblast migration in stroke mice after injection of PBS (left panels) or OPN (right panels) before (baseline) and at various time points after treatment. Photothrombotic stroke qualitatively elicited a migration of neuroblasts towards the lesioned hemisphere, both after OPN treatment and in controls. Note that for better visualization of the location of the ‘hotspots’, different scales were used for the left and right panels. c Before photothrombotic stroke, the maximal BLI signal was located close to the midline in all animals (baseline). After ischemic stroke, neuroblasts migrated towards the lesioned hemisphere in all groups of mice. In this, neuroblasts covered a greater distance in OPN-treated animals between day (D)7 and D21 after treatment compared with the controls. Note that 2 days after injection, the maximal BLI signal was localized in the contralateral hemisphere in OPN-treated mice (means ± SEM; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). d The absolute distance of neuroblast migration was measured as the distance between the baseline signal and the signal 7 days after treatment for each group of mice. The distance covered by neuroblasts in OPN-injected mice was significantly greater than that in the control group (means ± SEM; ***p < 0.001). e Representative immunohistochemical images of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption 2 days after focal cerebral ischemia. Healthy animals (left panels) did not show any signs of BBB disruption, whereas stroke animals (right panels) suffered from a more widespread BBB disruption around the peri-infarct area irrespective of control (upper right panel) or OPN treatment (lower right panel)

Full size image

OPN supports neurogenesis after focal cortical ischemia

To assess the effects of OPN on neurogenesis in the context of photothrombotic stroke, photon emission emanating from DCX+ neuroblasts was quantified and expressed as a ratio between lesioned/injected and the unlesioned (contralateral) hemisphere (Fig. 4a). In OPN-injected mice, this ratio was higher between days 7 and 28 after treatment, suggesting an enhanced expansion of neuroblasts (day 7 F(1,40) = 5.92, p < 0.05; day 10 F(1,40) = 13.94, p < 0.01; day 14 F(1,40) = 10.53, p < 0.01; day 21 F(1,40) = 12.20 p < 0.01; day 28 F(1,40) = 4.13, p < 0.05; Fig. 4a, b). Again, 2 days after injection, total flux of photons was transiently increased in the contralateral hemisphere of OPN-treated mice (F(1,40) = 7.17, p < 0.05), potentially suggesting enhanced recruitment of neuroblasts from the contralateral SVZ (Fig. 4b). Comparing the magnitude of effects seen after ischemia and in naive mice, ischemia robustly increased the extent of neuroblast expansion, as revealed by total flux (see Figs. 2b and 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Osteopontin (OPN) supports neurogenesis after stroke. Before photothrombosis (PT) (baseline) and at various time points after treatment, the total flux of photons was measured via bioluminescence imaging (BLI) as a surrogate for the number of doublecortin-positive (DCX+) neuroblasts. a Quantification of total flux was performed for each hemisphere and time point, as demonstrated on representative images, and a ratio was calculated between the hemispheres (the red rectangles in the baseline scan demonstrate measured ROIs of ipsi- and contralateral hemisphere). b Between day (D)7 and D28 after i.c.v. injection of OPN into stroke mice, the ratio between right (injected) and left (contralateral) hemisphere regarding the total flux of photons was significantly higher compared to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-injected stroke mice, consistent with increased expansion of DCX+ neuroblasts (means ± SEM; **p < 0.01). Note that 2 days after injection, total flux of photons was transiently enhanced in the contralateral hemisphere of OPN-treated mice (means ± SEM; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01). c Representative immunohistochemical images of DCX+ cells (red) costained with Hoechst (blue) in the subventricular zone (SVZ) ipsilateral to the i.c.v. injection in mice subjected to photothrombotic stroke. The number of DCX+ cells was increased 28 days after OPN treatment (right panels) compared with control (left panels; scale bars = 200 μm). d In mice subjected to photothrombotic stroke, the area covered by DCX+ cells in the SVZ was significantly increased in OPN-treated mice compared with PBS-injected controls after 28 days. This was observed in both SVZ, ipsi- as well as contralateral to i.c.v. injection (means ± SEM; ***p < 0.001). e Representative immunohistochemical images reveal DCX+ neuroblasts (red) costained with Hoechst (blue) in the peri-infarct area in mice 14 days after OPN treatment (right panels) but not in control animals (left panels; scale bars = 100 μm)

Full size image

Immunohistochemical staining revealed an increased number of DCX+ cells 28 days after OPN treatment compared with the control, thereby corroborating the in-vivo data (Fig. 4c). The area of the SVZ covered by DCX+ neuroblasts was significantly enlarged following OPN treatment, both in the ipsilateral as well as the contralateral hemisphere (F(3,86) = 14.05, p < 0.001; Fig. 4d). To detect neuroblasts migrating towards the ischemic lesion, DCX stainings were analyzed in the peri-infarct region 14 days after stroke. Interestingly, NSC+ neuroblasts were detected in the peri-infarct region only after OPN treatment, but not after PBS injection (Fig. 4e).

Discussion

We investigated the effect of OPN on neuroblasts in healthy mice as well as after focal cerebral ischemia. We observed that OPN supports directed migration as well as an expansion of the stem cell niche in vivo, as assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI).

Despite significant advances in regenerative medicine, the noninvasive visualization and quantification of endogenous neural progenitor cells in vivo remains challenging [29]. One current approach to visualize neural progenitors in vivo is the use of transgenic mice expressing the bioluminescent protein firefly luciferase under the control of the DCX promoter that is characteristic for neural progenitors, thus rendering the endogenous progenitor niche detectable by BLI [26]. In these mice, emission of photons emanating from DCX+ neuroblasts is quantified and reflects the neuroblast numbers; i.e., a quantitative increase in BLI signal indicates neurogenesis [26, 30]. We here established an additional read-out parameter in the DCX-luc mouse: the distance of the maximal BLI signal from the midline. Since at baseline this maximal signal, or ‘hotspot’, is located exactly in the midline, its distance from the midline indicates the migration of DCX+ neuroblasts. We chose those two distinct measures in analogy to our previous work in vitro where OPN independently affected proliferation and migration of primary NSC [25].

One potential pitfall reported with the DCX-luc model is that the disruption of the BBB may result in an increased BLI signal [31]. Since focal cerebral ischemia indeed disrupts the BBB, we included a control group of animals subjected to ischemia alone. Immunohistochemically, no relevant difference in the extent of BBB disruption between the verum and placebo group was found. Two days after OPN treatment, the maximal BLI signal was found in the contralateral hemisphere in OPN-treated mice only. One interpretation of this phenomenon could be increased recruitment of stem cells from the contralateral SVZ. Alternatively, a midline shift—evoked by peri-infarct edema—in addition to an enhanced BLI signal due to BBB disruption could also misdirect the BLI signal to the contralateral side. However, this would have been expected in both the verum and placebo group. Moreover, we confirmed the effects of OPN on neurogenesis by immunohistochemistry.

Overcoming such potential methodological drawback with BLI, we previously visualized activation and recruitment of NSC in the rat using an innovative positron emission tomography (PET) technique [32]. The present study corroborates and extends these previous findings, using an alternative visualization technique in mice. Thus, although BBB disruption may interfere with a direct comparison of effects, stem cell migration after cerebral ischemia was increased two-fold compared with that in naive mice (see Figs. 2 and 4). As a conclusion, and with the utmost caution, data suggest that osteopontin and the ischemic lesion may act synergistically in mobilizing stem cells.

The DCX-luc mouse has recently been used to visualize endogenous neurogenesis after experimental stroke induced by transiently occluding the middle cerebral artery, a stroke model that leads to more extensive ischemic lesions than the ones induced by photothrombosis as used in our study [30]. Interestingly, Adamczak et al. reported that while old animals display less basal neurogenesis than young mice, they respond to ischemic stroke with enhanced sensitivity and even recruit additional neuroblasts from the contralateral hemisphere, resulting in neurogenesis levels similar to young animals [30]. In line with this report, we observed recruitment of neural progenitors from the hemisphere contralateral to the ischemic stroke induced by OPN. Since upregulation of neurogenesis after ischemic stroke does not seem to decline with age, we suggest that mammals of any age would benefit from a pharmacological treatment aimed at enhancing progenitor proliferation.

Other groups have used bioluminescence imaging to monitor neural progenitor cells by transfecting them with the luciferase gene in vivo using viral vectors [33,34,35]. However, this approach labels only a subset of neural progenitors in the SVZ, while our experimental setup was designed to visualize the entire progenitor population expressing doublecortin. Using lentiviral vector-mediated labeling and BLI, Vandeputte et al. analyzed stem cell proliferation after photothrombotic stroke. Corresponding to our results, they reported an increased BLI signal between 2 days and 2 weeks after a stroke that decreased after 3 months [35]. Using the same stroke model, we here observed that OPN can augment upregulation of progenitor proliferation.

Neurogenesis is a central aspect of regenerative medicine. Various neurological disorders associated with neuronal loss are accompanied by concomitant upregulation of endogenous neurogenesis, as is the case after cerebral hypoxia [36], focal cerebral ischemia [37, 38], or in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s [39] and Huntington’s disease [40]. However, in most cases, this physiological upregulation of neurogenesis is insufficient to enable functional recovery. Multiple approaches have been taken to stimulate neurogenesis in the adult brain, including pharmacological means [41,42,43,44], as well as nonpharmacological approaches such as transcranial direct current stimulation [45,46,47].

Conclusion

We recently reported that OPN induces neurogenesis from neural stem cells in vitro, alongside the promotion of stem cell survival, proliferation, and migration, mediated by the CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) [25]. The current study extends these data in an in-vivo stroke model and corroborates earlier results by Yan et al. showing that absence of OPN impairs neuroblast migration towards an ischemic or hemorrhagic brain lesion [23, 24]. Besides proliferation and migration of neural progenitors, neuroinflammatory processes including hematogenous as well as brain-resident immune cells characterize the days and weeks after stroke [48,49,50,51]. This immune response includes an extensive upregulation of OPN in microglia and macrophages, where it serves as an essential regulatory protein [11, 12, 14, 15]. We recently reported that OPN modulates microglia function by shifting their inflammatory profile towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype [52]. Thus, OPN may be considered a dual role player after stroke, recruiting neural progenitors and harnessing neuroinflammation at the same time.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BBB:

Blood-brain barrier

BLI:

Bioluminescence imaging

BrdU:

Bromodeoxyuridine

CNS:

Central nervous system

DCX:

Doublecortin

i.c.v.:

Intracerebroventricular

iNOS:

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

luc:

Luciferase

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NSC:

Neural stem cells

OPN:

Osteopontin

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PET:

Positron emission tomography

PT:

Photothrombosis

ROI:

Region of interest

SVZ:

Subventricular zone

VOI:

Volume of interest

References

  1. Butler WT. The nature and significance of osteopontin. Connect Tissue Res. 1989;23(2–3):123–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler WT. Structural and functional domains of osteopontin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;760:6–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morales-Ibanez O, Dominguez M, Ki SH, Marcos M, Chaves JF, Nguyen-Khac E, Houchi H, Affo S, Sancho-Bru P, Altamirano J, et al. Human and experimental evidence supporting a role for osteopontin in alcoholic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2013;58(5):1742–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boche D, Perry VH, Nicoll JA. Review: activation patterns of microglia and their identification in the human brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013;39(1):3–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giachelli CM, Liaw L, Murry CE, Schwartz SM, Almeida M. Osteopontin expression in cardiovascular diseases. Ann NYAcadSci. 1995;760:109–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kato A, Okura T, Hamada C, Miyoshi S, Katayama H, Higaki J, Ito R. Cell stress induces upregulation of osteopontin via the ERK pathway in type II alveolar epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chabas D, Baranzini SE, Mitchell D, Bernard CC, Rittling SR, Denhardt DT, Sobel RA, Lock C, Karpuj M, Pedotti R, et al. The influence of the proinflammatory cytokine, osteopontin, on autoimmune demyelinating disease. Science. 2001;294(5547):1731–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Myles T, Leung LL. Thrombin hydrolysis of human osteopontin is dependent on thrombin anion-binding exosites. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(26):17789–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Sharma P, Kumar D, Chakraborty G, Gorain M, Kundu GC. Functional characterization of stromal osteopontin in melanoma progression and metastasis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McKee MD, Nanci A. Secretion of osteopontin by macrophages and its accumulation at tissue surfaces during wound healing in mineralized tissues: a potential requirement for macrophage adhesion and phagocytosis. Anat Rec. 1996;245(2):394–409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang KX, Denhardt DT. Osteopontin: role in immune regulation and stress responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008;19(5–6):333–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellison JA, Velier JJ, Spera P, Jonak ZL, Wang X, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ. Osteopontin and its integrin receptor alpha(v)beta3 are upregulated during formation of the glial scar after focal stroke. Stroke. 1998;29(8):1698–706.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MY, Shin SL, Choi YS, Kim EJ, Cha JH, Chun MH, Lee SB, Kim SY. Transient upregulation of osteopontin mRNA in hippocampus and striatum following global forebrain ischemia in rats. Neurosci Lett. 1999;271(2):81–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hedtjarn M, Mallard C, Hagberg H. Inflammatory gene profiling in the developing mouse brain after hypoxia-ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24(12):1333–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hur EM, Youssef S, Haws ME, Zhang SY, Sobel RA, Steinman L. Osteopontin-induced relapse and progression of autoimmune brain disease through enhanced survival of activated T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(1):74–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meller R, Stevens SL, Minami M, Cameron JA, King S, Rosenzweig H, Doyle K, Lessov NS, Simon RP, Stenzel-Poore MP. Neuroprotection by osteopontin in stroke. J CerebBlood Flow Metab. 2005;25(2):217–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doyle KP, Yang T, Lessov NS, Ciesielski TM, Stevens SL, Simon RP, King JS, Stenzel-Poore MP. Nasal administration of osteopontin peptide mimetics confers neuroprotection in stroke. J CerebBlood Flow Metab. 2008;28(6):1235–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schroeter M, Zickler P, Denhardt DT, Hartung HP, Jander S. Increased thalamic neurodegeneration following ischaemic cortical stroke in osteopontin-deficient mice. Brain. 2006;129:1426–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zou C, Luo Q, Qin J, Shi Y, Yang L, Ju B, Song G. Osteopontin promotes mesenchymal stem cell migration and lessens cell stiffness via integrin beta1, FAK, and ERK pathways. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;65(3):455–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poggio P, Grau JB, Field BC, Sainger R, Seefried WF, Rizzolio F, Ferrari G. Osteopontin controls endothelial cell migration in vitro and in excised human valvular tissue from patients with calcific aortic stenosis and controls. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(8):2139–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Giachelli CM, Lombardi D, Johnson RJ, Murry CE, Almeida M. Evidence for a role of osteopontin in macrophage infiltration in response to pathological stimuli in vivo. AmJPathol. 1998;152(2):353–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nilsson SK, Johnston HM, Whitty GA, Williams B, Webb RJ, Denhardt DT, Bertoncello I, Bendall LJ, Simmons PJ, Haylock DN. Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 2005;106(4):1232–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan YP, Lang BT, Vemuganti R, Dempsey RJ. Osteopontin is a mediator of the lateral migration of neuroblasts from the subventricular zone after focal cerebral ischemia. Neurochem Int. 2009;55(8):826–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan YP, Lang BT, Vemuganti R, Dempsey RJ. Persistent migration of neuroblasts from the subventricular zone to the injured striatum mediated by osteopontin following intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurochem. 2009;109(6):1624–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabenstein M, Hucklenbroich J, Willuweit A, Ladwig A, Fink GR, Schroeter M, Langen KJ, Rueger MA. Osteopontin mediates survival, proliferation and migration of neural stem cells through the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1):99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Couillard-Despres S, Finkl R, Winner B, Ploetz S, Wiedermann D, Aigner R, Bogdahn U, Winkler J, Hoehn M, Aigner L. In vivo optical imaging of neurogenesis: watching new neurons in the intact brain. Mol Imaging. 2008;7(1):28–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stoll G, Jander S, Schroeter M. Detrimental and beneficial effects of injury-induced inflammation and cytokine expression in the nervous system. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;513:87–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Klein, R., Blaschke, S., Neumaier, B. et al. Stem Cell Rev and Rep. 2014;10:539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-014-9512-5.

  29. Rueger MA, Schroeter M. In vivo imaging of endogenous neural stem cells in the adult brain. World J Stem Cells. 2015;7(1):75–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Adamczak J, Aswendt M, Kreutzer C, Rotheneichner P, Riou A, Selt M, Beyrau A, Uhlenkuken U, Diedenhofen M, Nelles M, et al. Neurogenesis upregulation on the healthy hemisphere after stroke enhances compensation for age-dependent decrease of basal neurogenesis. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;99:47–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayzenberg I, Schlevogt S, Metzdorf J, Stahlke S, Pedreitturia X, Hunfeld A, Couillard-Despres S, Kleiter I. Analysis of neurogenesis during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis reveals pitfalls of bioluminescence imaging. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rueger MA, Backes H, Walberer M, Neumaier B, Ullrich R, Simard ML, Emig B, Fink GR, Hoehn M, Graf R, et al. Noninvasive imaging of endogenous neural stem cell mobilization in vivo using positron emission tomography. J Neurosci. 2010;30(18):6454–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fricke IB, Viel T, Worlitzer MM, Collmann FM, Vrachimis A, Faust A, Wachsmuth L, Faber C, Dolle F, Kuhlmann MT, et al. 6-hydroxydopamine-induced Parkinson's disease-like degeneration generates acute microgliosis and astrogliosis in the nigrostriatal system but no bioluminescence imaging-detectable alteration in adult neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;43(10):1352–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reumers V, Deroose CM, Krylyshkina O, Nuyts J, Geraerts M, Mortelmans L, Gijsbers R, Van den Haute C, Debyser Z, Baekelandt V. Noninvasive and quantitative monitoring of adult neuronal stem cell migration in mouse brain using bioluminescence imaging. Stem Cells. 2008;26(9):2382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vandeputte C, Reumers V, Aelvoet SA, Thiry I, De Swaef S, Van den Haute C, Pascual-Brazo J, Farr TD, Vande Velde G, Hoehn M, et al. Bioluminescence imaging of stroke-induced endogenous neural stem cell response. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;69:144–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu J, Solway K, Messing RO, Sharp FR. Increased neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus after transient global ischemia in gerbils. J Neurosci. 1998;18(19):7768–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Arvidsson A, Collin T, Kirik D, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med. 2002;8(9):963–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Jin K, Minami M, Lan JQ, Mao XO, Batteur S, Simon RP, Greenberg DA. Neurogenesis in dentate subgranular zone and rostral subventricular zone after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(8):4710–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin K, Peel AL, Mao XO, Xie L, Cottrell BA, Henshall DC, Greenberg DA. Increased hippocampal neurogenesis in Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(1):343–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Curtis MA, Penney EB, Pearson AG, Roon-Mom WM, Butterworth NJ, Dragunow M, Connor B, Faull RL. Increased cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult human Huntington's disease brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(15):9023–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Androutsellis-Theotokis A, Leker RR, Soldner F, Hoeppner DJ, Ravin R, Poser SW, Rueger MA, Bae SK, Kittappa R, McKay RD. Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo. Nature. 2006;442(7104):823–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hucklenbroich J, Klein R, Neumaier B, Graf R, Fink GR, Schroeter M, Rueger MA. Aromatic-turmerone induces neural stem cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Leker RR, Soldner F, Velasco I, Gavin DK, Androutsellis-Theotokis A, McKay RD. Long-lasting regeneration after ischemia in the cerebral cortex. Stroke. 2007;38(1):153–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakatomi H, Kuriu T, Okabe S, Yamamoto S, Hatano O, Kawahara N, Tamura A, Kirino T, Nakafuku M. Regeneration of hippocampal pyramidal neurons after ischemic brain injury by recruitment of endogenous neural progenitors. Cell. 2002;110(4):429–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Braun R, Klein R, Walter HL, Ohren M, Freudenmacher L, Getachew K, Ladwig A, Luelling J, Neumaier B, Endepols H, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation accelerates recovery of function, induces neurogenesis and recruits oligodendrocyte precursors in a rat model of stroke. Exp Neurol. 2016;279:127–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pikhovych A, Stolberg NP, Jessica Flitsch L, Walter HL, Graf R, Fink GR, Schroeter M, Rueger MA. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates neurogenesis and microglia activation in the mouse brain. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:2715196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rueger MA, Keuters MH, Walberer M, Braun R, Klein R, Sparing R, Fink GR, Graf R, Schroeter M. Multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) elicits inflammatory and regenerative processes in the rat brain. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43776.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hallenbeck JM, Dutka AJ, Tanishima T, Kochanek PM, Kumaroo KK, Thompson CB, Obrenovitch TP, Contreras TJ. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte accumulation in brain regions with low blood flow during the early postischemic period. Stroke. 1986;17(2):246–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schroeter M, Jander S, Witte OW, Stoll G. Local immune responses in the rat cerebral cortex after middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neuroimmunol. 1994;55(2):195–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Schroeter M, Jander S, Witte OW, Stoll G. Heterogeneity of the microglial response in photochemically induced focal ischemia of the rat cerebral cortex. Neuroscience. 1999;89(4):1367–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang Q, Tang XN, Yenari MA. The inflammatory response in stroke. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;184(1–2):53–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rabenstein M, Vay SU, Flitsch LJ, Fink GR, Schroeter M, Rueger MA, Klein R, Mahlberg N, Ohren M, Ladwig A, et al. Osteopontin directly modulates cytokine expression of primary microglia and increases their survival. J Neuroimmunol. 2016;299(4):130–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Claudia Drapatz for excellent technical assistance.

Funding

This research work was supported by the Marga und Walter Boll-Stiftung (#210–12-12 and #210–10-15) and by the Köln Fortune Program/Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany (#13/2014 and #339/2015).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Rebecca Rogall and Monika Rabenstein contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany

    Rebecca Rogall, Monika Rabenstein, Sabine Vay, Annika Bach, Anton Pikhovych, Johannes Baermann, Gereon Rudolf Fink, Michael Schroeter & Maria Adele Rueger

  2. Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne, Germany

    Rebecca Rogall, Annika Bach, Anton Pikhovych, Mathias Hoehn, Michael Schroeter & Maria Adele Rueger

  3. Institute of Experimental Neuroregeneration, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg (SCI-TReCS), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

    Sébastien Couillard-Despres

  4. Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany

    Gereon Rudolf Fink, Michael Schroeter & Maria Adele Rueger

Authors
  1. Rebecca Rogall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monika Rabenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sabine Vay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Annika Bach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anton Pikhovych
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Johannes Baermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mathias Hoehn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sébastien Couillard-Despres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gereon Rudolf Fink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael Schroeter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Maria Adele Rueger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RR performed BLI, MRI, the image analyses and the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. AP and AB carried out the surgery and assisted in BLI and MRI. MR, SV, and JB performed the immunocytochemical stainings. SCD helped to conceive and design the study. GRF, MH, and MS participated in the design and coordination of the study and helped to draft the manuscript. MAR conceived of, designed, and coordinated the study, helped with the statistical analyses, and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Adele Rueger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All animal procedures followed the German laws for animal protection and were approved by the local animal care committee as well as local governmental authorities (Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz North Rhine-Westphalia, LANUV). Results are reported in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogall, R., Rabenstein, M., Vay, S. et al. Bioluminescence imaging visualizes osteopontin-induced neurogenesis and neuroblast migration in the mouse brain after stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther 9, 182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0927-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0927-9

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512