Skip to main content

Single-cell transcriptome analysis of uncultured human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

Abstract

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) have certain advantages over other MSCs and about 300 clinical trials have been registered using UC-MSCs to treat diseases such as osteoarthritis, autoimmune diseases, and degenerative disorders, yet, only limited success has been achieved. One reason is that in vitro expanded UC-MSCs show tremendous heterogeneity and their relationship to in vivo UC-MSCs remains unknown. Here, we investigated freshly isolated, uncultured UC-MSCs by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and found two populations of UC-MSCs. Although UC-MSCs share many expressed genes and may have the same origin, they can be clearly separated based on differentially expressed genes including CD73 and other markers. Moreover, group 1 MSCs are enriched in expression of genes in immune response/regulatory activities, muscle cell proliferation and differentiation, stemness, and oxidative stress while group 2 MSCs are enriched with gene expression in extracellular matrix production, osteoblast and chondrocytes differentiation, and bone and cartilage growth. These findings suggest that UC-MSCs should be separated right after isolation and individually expanded in vitro to treat different diseases.

Letter

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are a group of cells that can adhere to plastic surface and proliferate, express CD73, CD90, and CD105 but not CD34, CD45, CD11b, or HLA Class II, and can differentiate into osteoblast, chondrocyte, and adipocyte in vitro [1, 2]. They were first identified in the bone marrow and later detected in many tissues including adipose tissues, umbilical cord (Warton’s jelly) (UB-MSC), dermis, and placenta. Among MSCs of various sources, UC-MSCs have attracted much interest as these cells show low differentiation status, low immunogenicity, and easy to standardize [3]. Up to now, about 300 clinical trials have been registered using UC-MSCs to treat diseases such as osteoarthritis, autoimmune diseases, and degenerative disorders, yet, only limited success has been achieved [4]. MSCs may execute the therapeutic effects by immune suppression, differentiating into tissue cells, secretion of extracellular matrix, and providing pro-surviving signal molecules [1, 5]. However, the identity of UC-MSCs and their functions remain incompletely understood, thus hindering the clinical use of these cells.

scRNA-seq has become a powerful tool to characterize tissue stem cells [6]. Previous studies have analyzed cultured UC-MSCs with scRNA-seq and found that UC-MSCs could be divided into 11 subgroups [7], which showed differences in expression of genes encoding extracellular matrix (ECM), protein process, and cell cycle-regulating proteins. In this study, we analyzed MSCs freshly isolated from Warton’s jelly of human umbilical cord and compared them to cultured UC-MSCs. We used a widely-used protocol to isolate human UC-MSCs (after removing blood vessels). We found that UC cells isolated with this protocol could adhere to plastic petri dishes and proliferate for at least 4 passages. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the cultured cells were negative for CD34, CD45, CD11b, and HLA-DR but positive for CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD44 (Supplementary Figure S1a). They also expressed very low levels of CD146 and CD200 (Supplementary Figure S1a). They could differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, or adipocytes in vitro (Supplementary Figure S1b). Thus, these UC-MSCs meet the criteria of MSCs. We then carried out scRNA-seq on freshly isolated UC-MSCs. A total of 5330 cells were sequenced at the depth of 3800 genes per cell (Fig. 1a). t-SNE analysis revealed two populations of epithelial cells and two populations of MSCs with the former expressing epithelial cell signature genes, e.g., EPCAM, KRT13, KRT14, and KRT17, and the latter expressing mesenchymal signature genes, e.g., PDGFRA, COL1A1, COL1A2, and COL3A1 (Fig. 1b–d).

Fig. 1
figure1

Clustering and characterization of uncultured umbilical cord cells. a t-NSE analysis of cells released from the Warton’s jelly of human umbilical cord. b Heatmap showing the top 10 differentially expressed signature genes in MSC and epithelial cell subgroups. c Expression of PDGFRα and EPCAM in MSC and epithelial cell subgroups. d Expression of selected key genes in the two UC-MSC subpopulations. e Heatmap showing the top 10 differentially expressed signature genes in the two MSC subpopulations. f KEGG analysis of the two UC-MSC subpopulations. g GO analysis of the two UC-MSC subpopulations

The two epithelial subpopulations have different features with one group expressing ECM genes and the other expressing development-related genes (Supplementary Figure S2A and B), suggesting that group 1 may represent epithelial progenitors while group 2 may represent the amniotic or cord-lining epithelia. Interestingly, both groups express CD29 and CD44, which are believed to be stem/progenitor cell markers, consistent with the primitive nature of cells of embryonic tissues. We then focused on the MSCs. The gene expression profiles of the two MSC subpopulations were similar (Fig. 1b and d), and both groups expressed PDGFRA, VIM, COL1A2, and ACTA2 (Fig. 1d and supplementary Figure S3), suggesting that the two MSC groups might have the same origin. However, 176 genes were differentially expressed (Fig. 1e and supplementary Table S2), suggesting that they may have distinct functions.

Examination of cell surface marker gene expression revealed that neither group expressed CD31, CD34, CD45, or CD11b (Fig. 1d and supplementary Figure S4). They expressed low levels of CD73, CD90, and CD105, the common MSC markers, although CD73 was mainly expressed in group 1 MSCs (Fig. 1d and supplementary Figure S4). Moreover, they expressed low levels of CD200 but not CD106 or CD146 (Fig. 1d and supplementary Figure S4). Thus, the surface marker expression pattern of uncultured UC-MSCs is different from cultured UC-MSCs.

MSCs in the bone marrow are believed to be skeletal stem cells, which can be marked by PRRX1, TWIST2, LEPR, GREMLIN1, GLI1, PTHRP, and/or CTSK [8]. We analyzed the expression of these markers and found that both UC-MSC groups expressed TWIST2 (and TWIST1) but not PRRX1, GLI1, GREMLIN 1, or LEPR, and a portion of group 2 cells expressed PRRX1, PTHRP, or CTSK (Fig. 1d and supplementary Figure S5a). In addition, there is evidence that MSCs are pericytes although later studies produced conflicting results [9, 10]. Our scRNA-seq data showed that UC-MSCs expressed some of the pericyte markers including DESMIN, CD13, and CD248 but not NG2, ANG1/2, or RGS5 (Supplementary Figure S5b), suggesting that UC-MSCs are not typical pericytes. The lack of pericytes can be explained by removal of the blood vessels and associated cells during MSC isolation.

KEGG pathway analysis revealed that group 1 UC-MSCs were enriched with TNFα, IL17, TLR, TGFβ, infection, NOD, NF-κB, and PGE pathways, many of which are immune-related (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Figure S6a-c). These pathways drive the expression of chemokines and immunomodulatory including PGE2, suggesting that group 1 MSCs may play a role in immune response and/or regulation. In addition, group 1 cells were enriched in the expression of genes in controlling pluripotency (Fig. 1f), whereas group 2 cells were enriched in the expression of genes in protein metabolism, extracellular matrix, and glucose and amino acid metabolism pathways (Fig. 1f). These results suggest that the two UC-MSC groups may have different functions.

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed that group 1 MSCs expressed genes in biological activities including inflammation, muscle proliferation, cell differentiation, and oxidative stress response while group 2 cells expressed genes enriched in ECM synthesis, bone and cartilage growth, and glucose metabolism (Fig. 1g), confirming that the two UC-MSC subpopulations may have different functions.

This study shows that the standard UC-MSC isolation protocol also yields epithelial cells, which can be removed by FACS sorting based on their cell surface markers (CD24+CD44+PTHRP+) (Supplementary Figures S4-S5). More importantly, we find that UC-MSCs can be divided into two subpopulations based on differentially expressed genes especially cell surface markers such as CD73. Group 1 MSCs have features that are reminiscent of the therapeutic activities of MSCs including immunomodulation, pro-survival, and differentiation potentials, whereas group 2 MSCs have features suggesting that they are at a more differentiated state than group 1 MSCs and may be useful for repairing degenerated cartilage.

While this study identifies two subpopulations in freshly isolated UC-MSCs, a recent study shows that cultured human UC-MSCs can be divided into 11 groups. KEGG and GO analyses show that none of these 11 subpopulations expresses immunomodulatory genes [7]. These findings, taken together, suggest that freshly isolated UC-MSCs give rise to more subpopulations during in vitro expansion, and moreover, these cells may lose their original gene expression patterns and activities. It will be interesting to compare the therapeutic effects of the two uncultured UC-MSC subpopulations against cultured cells on osteoarthritis and autoimmune disorders. Moreover, right culture conditions are needed to maintain pluripotency and the major features of the UC-MSC subpopulations for future cell-based therapy.

Availability of data and materials

The scRNA-seq data have been deposited into NCBI with a project number “PRJNA643879”.

Abbreviations

MSC:

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells

UC:

Umbilical cord

scRNA-seq:

Single-cell RNA sequencing

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

GO:

Gene Ontology

References

  1. 1.

    Galipeau J, Sensebe L. Mesenchymal stromal cells: clinical challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(6):824–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sipp D, Robey PG, Turner L. Clear up this stem-cell mess. Nature. 2018;561(7724):455–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Secco M, Zucconi E, Vieira NM, Fogaca LL, Cerqueira A, Carvalho MD, Jazedje T, Okamoto OK, Muotri AR, Zatz M. Multipotent stem cells from umbilical cord: cord is richer than blood! Stem Cell. 2008;26(1):146–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arrigoni C, D'Arrigo D, Rossella V, Candrian C, Albertini V, Moretti M. Umbilical Cord MSCs and Their Secretome in the Therapy of Arthritic Diseases: A Research and Industrial Perspective. Cells. 2020;9(6):1343.

  5. 5.

    Jia Z, Wang S, Liu Q. Identification of differentially expressed genes by single-cell transcriptional profiling of umbilical cord and synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(2):1945–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Trapnell C. Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res. 2015;25(10):1491–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Barrett AN, Fong CY, Subramanian A, Liu W, Feng Y, Choolani M, Biswas A, Rajapakse JC, Bongso A. Human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells show unique gene expression compared with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells using single-cell RNA-sequencing. Stem Cell Dev. 2019;28(3):196–211.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(11):696–711.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, Chen C-W, Corselli M, Park TS, Andriolo G, Sun B, Zheng B, Zhang L, et al. A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(3):301–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Guimaraes-Camboa N, Cattaneo P, Sun Y, Moore-Morris T, Gu Y, Dalton ND, Rockenstein E, Masliah E, Peterson KL, Stallcup WB, et al. Pericytes of multiple organs do not behave as mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(3):345–59 e345.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC2002804 and 2018YFA0800803), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81520108012 and 91542120), and Major Program of Development Fund for Shanghai Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone “Stem Cell Strategic Biobank and Stem Cell Clinical Technology Transformation Platform” (ZJ2018-ZD-004).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.L., F.Y., and B. L. designed the research. S. Z. and J. W. performed the research and analyzed the data. H.L., F.Y., and B. L. wrote the paper. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Yin or Huijuan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted using the protocols approved by the Ethical Committee of the Shanghai East Hospital. Informed consents were obtained from the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Methods used in this study.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table S1.

List of the top 50 genes differentially expressed in the two epithelial subpopulations.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table S2.

List of the top 50 genes differentially expressed in the two MSC subpopulations.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure S1.

Cultured human UC-MSCs show major MSC features. a. Flow cytometry analysis of cell surface markers on the cultured UC-MSCs. b. In vitro differentiation potentials of human UC-MSCs. Histochemical staining was performed to assess the differentiation into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure S2.

Characterization of uncultured umbilical epithelial cells. a. Heatmap showing differentially expressed signature genes in the two epithelial cell subpopulations. b. KEGG and GO analysis of the two epithelial cell subpopulations.

Additional file 6: Supplementary Figure S3.

Expression of fibroblast/stromal marker genes in group 1 and 2 UC-MSCs.

Additional file 7: Supplementary Figure S4.

Expression of cell surface marker genes in group 1 and 2 UC-MSCs.

Additional file 8: Supplementary Figure S5.

Expression of skeletal stem cell (A) and pericyte (B) markers genes in the two UC-MSC subpopulations.

Additional file 9: Supplementary Figure S6.

IL17, TGF, and TNF pathway were activated in group 1 UC-MSCs. Genes in red are up-regulated.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Wang, J.Y., Li, B. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of uncultured human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-02055-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • MSC
  • Umbilical cord
  • scRNA-seq
  • Heterogeneity
  • Epithelia