Skip to main content

Reconstructing the pulmonary niche with stem cells: a lung story


The global burden of pulmonary disease highlights an overwhelming need in improving our understanding of lung development, disease, and treatment. It also calls for further advances in our ability to engineer the pulmonary system at cellular and tissue levels. The discovery of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) offsets the relative inaccessibility of human lungs for studying developmental programs and disease mechanisms, all the while offering a potential source of cells and tissue for regenerative interventions. This review offers a perspective on where the lung stem cell field stands in terms of accomplishing these ambitious goals. We will trace the known stages and pathways involved in in vivo lung development and how they inspire the directed differentiation of stem and progenitor cells in vitro. We will also recap the efforts made to date to recapitulate the lung stem cell niche in vitro via engineered cell–cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions.


The mammalian respiratory system is a concert between two very elaborate branching structures: the pulmonary epithelium which transports air to the alveoli, and the vasculature which carries blood through the alveoli for gas exchange [1]. The pulmonary epithelium is continually lined with distinct populations of progenitor and specialized cells whose functions are defined by their location along the branched network. For instance, the proximal lung, comprising the trachea and bronchi, expresses a pseudostratified epithelium including basal cells that are the stem cells of the airway, goblet cells that secrete mucus, ciliated cells that move mucus in a cephalic direction along the airway, and neuroendocrine cells that serve as airway sensors [1, 2]. In comparison, 95% of the distal lung is lined with thin, elongated type 1 alveolar epithelial cells (AEC1) that facilitate gas exchange. The remaining 5% of alveolar surface is dominated by surfactant-producing type 2 alveolar epithelial cells (AEC2) [3]. Additionally, the lung epithelium is surrounded by a mesenchymal compartment that comprises a wide variety of cell types such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells.

Lung organogenesis is a highly elaborate and coordinated process. Most of what we know about the developing human lung comes from studying rodent models. However, there are apparent discrepancies between human versus rodent lung development. For example, alveolarization is initiated only after birth in rodent lungs [4, 5]. In contrast, alveolar maturation begins prior to birth in human lungs [1]. There are also differences in the population and location of certain stem and progenitor cells in the lungs of both species [1]. For instance, basal cells line the entire conducting airway in humans, but are restricted to the trachea and main stem bronchi in mice [6, 7]. Additionally, the alveoli and bronchioles in mouse lungs maintain a population of bronchio-alveolar stem cells (BASCs) that can give rise to both proximal and distal lung epithelial cell types [5, 8,9,10]. However, the presence of BASCs in human lungs remains uncertain [11]. As will be revealed later, there are also inherent differences in the genes and signaling pathways involved in the temporal specific regulation of lung development among both species [12,13,14].

Thus, there is a gaping need for in vitro platforms that can closely recapitulate the complexity of human lung development and physiology with improved fidelity. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), collectively referred to as human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provide a unique opportunity to apply the developmental signaling mechanisms understood from native embryogenesis to recapitulate key aspects of human lung development that were previously unfeasible to study [1]. While ESCs have provided much needed insight into the derivation of lung cells, their use toward clinical research and application is challenged by limited availability and ethical concerns [15]. The use of iPSCs, that can be induced to a pluripotent status from somatic cells not only offsets these limitations, but also realizes the promise of personalized medicine as such cell lines can be generated from any individual [16]. Personalized disease modeling and drug screening immediately comes to mind as some of the potential outcomes of iPSC research. Currently, hPSC-derived lung epithelial cells possess an immature phenotype unfit for transplantation, leaving many areas of active investigation [17, 18]. Generating cells and eventually, tissues and organs for clinical use remains the crown jewel of the lung field.

In vitro recapitulation of the developmental program of the lung

Prior studies have characterized the adult lung as a relatively quiescent organ with extremely low levels of cellular turnover and a limited capacity for regeneration [19]. Only recently has this slow but continuous renewal of lung tissue by endogenous stem and progenitor cells garnered interest and appreciation [20]. Several attempts have been made to recapitulate lung development via in vitro hPSC differentiation; gradually progressing from inducing progenitor stages such as definitive endoderm [21,22,23,24], and anterior foregut endoderm [25, 26] to deriving lung-specific epithelial progenitors [14, 27, 28] and further to specialized respiratory epithelial cell types [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Provided below is an up-to-date description of the differentiation process as inspired by the in vivo developmental program of the murine lung.

Definitive endoderm

The lung epithelium, purely of endodermal origin, emerges from a small population of Nkx2.1 positive progenitor cells. Canonical Wnt/ β-catenin signaling and Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) signaling via Nodal drives the initial specification of primitive streak and then endodermal lineage in the embryo; cells that ingress through the primitive streak experiencing greater Nodal signaling are specified as definitive endoderm (DE) (Fig. 1a) [22]. Accordingly, DE induction is also the first act in hPSC differentiation into specialized pulmonary epithelial cells in vitro [35]. Activin A, a nodal protein alternative is commonly used to specify DE in in vitro stem cell differentiation [23, 24, 36].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Directing lung stem cell differentiation in vitro via introduction of signaling ligands or small-molecule regulators mimicking in vivo lung development. a In mid-gastrula stage, DE elongates from the anterior end of primitive streak. The Nodalhigh region gives rise to the future foregut. b The AP axis along the gut tube is established at the end of gastrulation, regulated by the molecular gradient of ligands and antagonists of Wnt, Fgf4, and Bmp signaling. c The ventralization of foregut is regulated by the gradient of Wnt2/2b and Bmp, and its completion is marked by the emergence of Nkx2.1-positive lung progenitor cells. d The proximal–distal patterning and branching morphogenesis of developing lung is guided by a lateral inhibition mechanism of Fgf10. A/P, anterior/posterior. P/D, proximal/distal. D/V, dorsal/ventral

Anterior–posterior (AP) patterning of the gut tube

After gastrulation (E7.5-9.0 in mice), the DE folds to form a primitive gut tube that further differentiates along the AP axis into several organ-specific epithelial lineages that eventually give rise to most organs in the digestive system and the lung [37]. Endodermal patterning is inherently driven by the programmed crosstalk between the DE and its surrounding mesenchyme via Wnt, Bone morphogenetic protein 4 (Bmp4), retinoid acid (RA) and Fibroblast growth factor 4 (Fgf4) signaling, resulting in the Sox2high anterior foregut, Pdx1high posterior foregut, and Cdxhigh hindgut at E8.5 of mouse embryogenesis (Fig. 1b) [38,39,40,41]. Specifically, the esophagus, trachea, stomach, lungs, thyroid, liver, and pancreas are derived from the foregut, while the small and large intestines are derived from the midgut and hindgut, respectively [38].

Within the foregut, the lung is further specified in the anterior portion, known as the anterior foregut endoderm (AFE). Accordingly, deriving AFE cells from DE marks the next stage in hPSC differentiation into lung epithelium. Established cocktails for in vitro DE anteriorization usually include a combination of BMP and TGF-β inhibition. Some known examples include the combined use of NOGGIN (BMP inhibitor) and SB431542 (TGF-β inhibitor) or Dorsomorphin (BMP inhibitor) and SB431542 (TGF-β inhibitor) [25, 27].

Dorsal–ventral (DV) patterning of the AFE

Signals from the surrounding mesenchyme also establish a gradient along the DV axis of the AFE [42]. During this time in development (E9.0 in mice), one of the earliest markers of the lung epithelium, Nkx2.1 is specified in a small group of cells located along the ventral side of the AFE, marking the start of the embryonic phase of lung development (spanning up to E12.5 in mice) [43,44,45,46]. Although the emergence of lung progenitors is marked by the induction of Nkx2.1 expression, the deletion of Nkx2.1 gene in mice leads to abnormal but continued lung development [47].

Between E9.0-E10.5 in mice, the mesenchyme which surrounds the AFE exhibits a gradient of β-catenin activated by Wnt2/2b ligands concentrated at the ventral side of the foregut [40, 45, 48,49,50]. A Wnt2/2b double knockout model in mouse embryos was found to be devoid of any Nkx2.1 expression or lung organogenesis, echoing the importance of the contributions made by β-catenin signaling during lung specification in the foregut endoderm [45, 51]. Additionally, at E9.0 in mice, BMP signaling from the mesenchyme surrounding the ventral foregut suppresses Sox2 (indicative of esophageal fate) in the ventral endoderm, further allowing for the specification of respiratory fate via Nkx2.1 expression. (52) In essence, the gradient established by Wnt2/2b and Bmp4 defines the dorsal Sox2high esophageal region and the ventral Nkx2.1high lung territory (Fig. 1c) [41, 45, 52,53,54].

At E10.5 in mice, the Nkx2.1 positive progenitor cells evaginate to initiate lung budding at the ventral wall of the AFE. This is facilitated by Fgf10 signaling from the surrounding mesenchyme [55]. Besides Fgf10, RA signaling also plays a crucial role in lung bud formation as it promotes Wnt2/2b signaling by suppressing the Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-related protein 1 (Dkk1); this is vital for conserving Nkx2.1 identity among the progenitors [56]. Additionally, RA signaling suppresses TGF-β signaling in the surrounding mesenchyme, which is critical for Fgf10 mediated lung budding [57].

Accordingly, ventralization of AFE cells to generate NKX2.1-positive lung progenitors is the next logical step in directed lung epithelial differentiation from hPSCs. Most ventralization cocktails utilize some combinations of developmentally inspired signaling molecules such as BMP4, FGF10, Keratinocyte Growth Factor (KGF), RA, and WNT activation via CHIR99021 (a GSK3β inhibitor) [58]. A recent study found that FGF signaling was dispensable for NKX2.1 specification during the ventralization stage, and established three essential factors for NKX2.1 induction, CHIR99021 (Wnt agonist via GSK3β inhibition), BMP4 and RA [59]. Further, during the codifferentiation of cardiac and pulmonary lineages, effective NKX2.1-positive lung progenitor induction can be obtained by adding only CHIR99021 and RA during ventralization [60].

Proximal–Distal patterning and branching morphogenesis

During the pseudoglandular stage of lung organogenesis (E12.5-E16.5 in mice), the lung buds that sprout from the ventral foregut endoderm elongate and branch into the surrounding mesenchyme via a process called branching morphogenesis. Specifically, the distal epithelial tips undergo a period of repetitive bifurcations that results in the highly arborized tissue network that is characteristic of the lung [43, 61]. As hinted earlier, Fgf10 plays a critical, however, distinct role in branching morphogenesis of mouse and human lungs. In mice, Fgf10 from the distal lung mesenchyme surrounding the branching epithelial tips acts on Fgfr2-expressing epithelial cells to promote the expression of Bmp4 and Shh (Fig. 2a), which in turn inhibits Fgf10 expression. This lateral inhibition mechanism drives the outgrowth of new epithelial branches [62, 63]. In contrast, the role of FGF10 in human branching morphogenesis remains unclear. In human fetal lung explant culture, FGF10 treatment decreased the number of SOX2/SOX9 double positive cells and failed to induce branching [64, 65]. Another study found that the removal of FGF10 from in vitro bud tip progenitor culture did not affect the expression of human distal tip markers such as SOX2 and SOX9 [14].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Recapitulating the lung cell-ECM interaction in vitro. a Cell-ECM interaction during in vivo branching morphogenesis. Fgf10 in the mesenchyme surrounding the branching tips specifies the Sox9/ID2 positive cell fate. b Schematics showing how engineered ECM can modulate cellular interactions with key morphogenic growth factors (such as FGF10) in human lung stem cell engineering. Traditional FGF10 is delivered in its free soluble form. Using functionalized ECM with enhanced affinity to FGF10, such as that modified with heparin, more durable bioactivity and biomimetic ECM association can be introduced. Further, spatial specific delivery or activation of growth factors, using approaches such as photo-activatable biomaterials, can offer further control over directed tissue formation, mimicking the mechanism underlying native branching morphogenesis. P/D, proximal/distal

At the same time (in mice), the Nkx2.1-positive progenitors lining the epithelium start to exhibit distinct fate along the proximal–distal axis, resulting in Sox2-positive proximal lung progenitors and Sox9/Id2-positive distal lung progenitors. Interestingly, Sox2 expression makes multiple comebacks over the course of fetal lung development: first as a pluripotency marker during gastrulation, then during anteriorization of the foregut endoderm, and finally during branching morphogenesis at the primary bronchial stalk in basal cells alongside P63. In fact, this final-stage Sox2 expression is maintained throughout the conducting airway morphogenesis until adulthood, suggesting the importance of Sox2 in driving epithelial differentiation in the airway, including into secretory cells, ciliated cells, and secretory cells [54, 66,67,68]. In the meantime, Sox9/Id2-positive cells specified in the distal lung eventually differentiate into AEC1 and AEC2 at the branching tips (Fig. 1d) [20, 69]. This marks yet another difference between mouse and human lungs, as during the pseudoglandular stage, human distal lung tips are double positive for both SOX2 and SOX9. However, this SOX2/SOX9 double positive feature is later lost during the canalicular stage of human lung development as these progenitor cells further differentiate [12].

The canalicular stage (E16.5-E17.5 in mice) marks the emergence of the pulmonary parenchyma and the air-blood barrier. During this stage, the terminal lung buds flatten and a thin air-blood barrier appears where the capillaries directly contact the flattened epithelium comprising AEC1 and AEC2 pneumocytes [43]. Eventually, during the saccular stage (E17.5-P0 in mice), these terminal buds develop into small sacs acting as alveolar precursors. At the same time, AEC2 starts to produce respiratory surfactants. While surfactants are initially stored in the intracellular lamellar bodies of AEC2, it is later secreted into the alveoli to reduce surface tension at the air–liquid interface.

Finally, just prior to birth, the developing lung enters the alveolar stage, lasting well into early childhood in both mice and human. Here, the small alveolar sacs formed during the canalicular, and saccular stages undergo further division via secondary septation to increase the surface area available for gas exchange [70]. Additionally, the capillary units associated with the alveoli become tightly apposed to AEC1 for enhanced gas-exchange efficiency [71]. Alveologenesis and vasculogenesis continues until the lungs enter quiescent homeostasis.

A few protocols have already established the derivation of both proximal and distal lung cells together from hPSC-derived NKX2.1 positive progenitors. Known recipes include a combination of CHIR99021, FGF10 and KGF, and a combination of CHIR99021, FGF10, KGF, BMP4 and RA [27, 30]. These protocols often yield a combination of multiple cell types, rendering them extremely useful as models for development. Below is a discussion of existing protocols for the directed differentiation of hPSC-derived NKX2.1 positive progenitors to specific pulmonary epithelial lineages.

  • Basal cells: A recent study implicated Wnt signaling as the driver of the bifurcation between proximal (low Wnt) versus distal (high Wnt) fate among Nkx2.1-positive lung progenitors [72]. FGF10 signaling has been shown to maintain epithelial progenitors in an undifferentiated state [73]. It is also highly expressed throughout the parenchyma in the human airway and resident vascular smooth muscle cells [64, 65]. Accordingly, a medium without exogenous Wnt, and with FGF10 and FGF2 was developed for deriving airway basal cells from hPSCs [32]. 3D Matrigel culture was then initiated in a medium comprising FGF2 and FGF10, together with Dexmethasone, Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (DCI). The resulting cells were marked by the co-expression of the typical basal cell markers such as NKX2.1, P63, and SOX2, and are capable of long-term self-renewal and differentiation into ciliated and secretory cells in a way similar to what primary basal cells do.

  • AEC2: AEC2s serve several functions in the lung, including secreting surfactants to maintain the patency of the alveoli, and further differentiating into AEC1s [74]. The differentiation of hPSC-derived AEC2s capable of long-term in vitro self-renewal was recently reported [31]. NKX2.1-positive lung progenitors, enriched by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), were transferred to 3D Matrigel-embedded culture in the presence of CHIR99021 (WNT agonist), to promote distal lung specification. KGF was also supplemented to the medium, due to its role in inducing AEC2 differentiation and proliferation in vivo [75]. Additionally, cAMP and 3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (cAMP signaling agonist) were also added to promote alveolar maturation [76]. Following two weeks of treatment with the CK-DCI (CHIR99021, KGF and DCI) medium, CHIR99021 (Wnt) exposure was withdrawn for one week, followed by CHIR99021 addback. The resulting protocol was able to successfully enable the formation of alveolospheres comprising SFTPC-positive AEC2s. The withdrawal and subsequent addback of CHIR99021 is consistent with the Wnt signaling wave observed during murine lung development and is required for AEC2 maturation and long-term self-renewal [77]. The induced AEC2s also possessed functional lamellar bodies and were capable of surfactant secretion, a key function of AEC2 in lung physiology. However, the SFTPC-positive hPSC-derived AEC2s generally possessed an immature phenotype in comparison with their in vivo counterpart, and additional molecular signatures, such as ABCA3, are likely required to define mature AEC2s [78, 79].

  • AEC1: AEC1s facilitate the primary function of the lung – gas exchange. Historical evidence suggests that AEC2s isolated from rats that are seeded on tissue culture-treated plastic readily transdifferentiate into AEC1-like cells, expressing similar morphology and markers as native AEC1s [80]. More recently, a serum-free, feeder-free protocol was developed to differentiate primary human AEC2 to AEC1 in vitro [81]. This media combined SB431542 (TGF-β inhibitor), CHIR99021 (Wnt agonist), BIRB796 (that inhibits mitogen-activated protein kinase or MAPK), FGF10, and Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) in the presence of human serum. The resulting cells were marked by an increase in AGER (AEC1 marker) and a decrease in SFTPC expression. These cells also possessed a flat, thin morphology characteristic of AEC1. Additionally, hPSC-derived AEC2s cultured in 2D conditions possessed flat AEC1-like morphology, along with the upregulation of AEC1 markers such as AGER, CAV1 and PDPN [31]. Similar AEC1-like cells were also observed in an hPSC-derived lung bud organoid model [82]. More recently, hPSC-derived AEC2s co-cultured with fetal lung fibroblasts differentiated into alveolar organoids comprising both AEC1s and AEC2s [33]. They also demonstrated that the AEC2s further differentiate into AEC1s in the presence of XAV-939 (Wnt inhibition), possessing AEC1-like flat and thin cell morphology, in addition to expressing a combination of AEC1 markers, including AGER, HT1-56, PDPN, and HOPX. Single cell RNA sequencing also revealed considerable similarities to primary AEC1s. Despite progresses discussed here, the mechanisms driving hPSC differentiation into AEC1s remain not completely understood and functional assays for fully characterizing the induced AEC1s remains limited, which presents opportunities for future investigation.

Pulmonary organoids: organized cell–cell interactions

The human lung is home to over 40 individual cell types that coordinate to maintain respiratory function [83, 84]. Accordingly, communication between these participating cells is often at the heart of major events such as lung organogenesis and pathogenesis. However, this communication maybe lost in translation going from three-dimensional (3D) organs to two-dimensional (2D) cell culture models, citing the need for 3D tissue platforms that can recreate the native-like tissue microenvironment in vitro. Lung organoids are 3D micrometer-to-millimeter-scale tissues generated from primary or hPSC-derived epithelial progenitors that self-assemble and further differentiate to recapitulate some aspect(s) of respiratory tissue architecture and physiology in an in vitro setting. They can be broadly classified as: proximal lung organoids that feature cells mimicking the conducting airway, distal lung organoids that recapitulate the alveoli, or proximal–distal organoids.

Proximal lung organoids

While the conducting airway generally exhibits slow cellular turnover, it has its own population of adult stem cells, the basal cells, which can renew and replenish the airway epithelium in the event of an injury [85]. Airway epithelial cells are relatively easy to acquire from patients given that they can be isolated from nasal swab cultures [86]. As discussed earlier, basal cells can also be generated from hPSCs [72, 87, 88]. Such easy access has opened up the possibility of generating airway disease models that leverage the knowledge of in vivo differentiation cues to drive basal cell specification toward a muco-ciliary fate in vitro.

The in vitro self-organization of airway epithelial cells in collagen into 3D tubular structures comprising basal, secretory, and ciliated cells was first reported almost 30 years ago [89]. Almost two decades later, the first account of basal cell self-organization and differentiation into airway organoids was reported. Using air–liquid interface (ALI) culture and Matrigel embedding, this study demonstrated that basal cells derived from both murine and human sources can proliferate and form individual spherical structures that they termed “tracheospheres”. The tracheospheres possessed a P63-positive basal cell layer on the basal lateral side, and an inner apical lumen lined with Alpha-Acetylated-Tubulin-positive ciliated cells [6].

Airway organoids generated from both patient-derived basal cells and hPSCs can serve as powerful models for the study of disease mechanisms and possible drug therapies for airway respiratory illnesses. A prominent example of this is airway organoids that model cystic fibrosis (CF), a disease caused by mutations of a single gene—the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene [72, 90]. So far, over 2000 disease-causing mutations of the CFTR gene have been identified. Accordingly, generating patient-specific organoids to screen for mutation-specific therapies that can restore CFTR function has been an important research milestone in this field [91, 92]. Further, airway organoids can also be used to model the defective cilia motility associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) [32, 93, 94]. Airway organoids have also been used to model the plasticity of the airway epithelium in response to anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines. For instance, the use of interleukin (IL)-13 and IL-6 has been shown to drive basal cell differentiation toward a secretory fate, and ciliated fate, respectively [95, 96]. Currently, there are no airway organoid models that can recapitulate mucociliary clearance, one of the primary functions of the conducting airway, suggesting that there remains much to be investigated in this field.

Distal lung organoids

AEC2s have long been considered the resident adult stem cell population of the alveolus, possessing an established ability for self-renewal [18, 97]. While their capacity for differentiation to AEC1s are thought to be set in motion by injury, the mechanisms behind this are not well understood [31, 33, 82]. AEC2s isolated from mice were first accounted to generate alveolar organoids in 2013; FACS-enriched AEC2s cultured in an ALI/Matrigel system along with primary Pdgfrα-positive lung fibroblasts were shown to form 3D spherical structures termed “alveolospheres” comprising Sftpc-positive AEC2s and cells positive for AEC1 markers such as Aqp5 and Hopx [97]. However, unlike basal cells in the conducting airway, the epithelial population of the alveoli are far less accessible. Alternatively, as reported earlier, alveolar organoids can also be derived from hPSCs [14, 31, 98].

Alveolar organoids generated from both primary sources and hPSCs have demonstrated great potential to recapitulate disease pathology and address the shortage of physiologically relevant in vitro systems for therapeutic testing. An important example of this was the recent use of lung organoids as a model for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection [99,100,101]. One such study demonstrated that the AEC2-like cells in the hPSC-derived lung organoids expressed the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, much like their native counterpart [99]. This model, to a certain extent, was able to recapitulate the inflammatory response that occurs in human lungs during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, they were also able to screen for several FDA-approved drugs that target the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 entry. Further, hPSC-derived alveolar organoids have also been used to demonstrate the potential of gene editing tools such as CRISPR, which was recently used to correct a SFTPB mutation [31]. Despite the great advances in engineering lung organoids, vascularizing an hPSC-derived distal lung organoid to accurately recapitulate gas exchange in the alveoli remains an elusive goal in this field. However, a recent study tri-cultured normal lung fibroblasts, AEC2-like A549 cells, and endothelial cells to generate a first of its kind vascularized alveolar model, inching us a step closer [102].

Mesenchymal participation in lung organoids

The pulmonary mesenchyme comprises myofibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and macrophages. [103, 104]. A seminal protocol recently described the derivation of both, mesenchymal and epithelial compartments in an hPSC-derived lung organoid [82]. These hPSC-derived “lung bud organoids” notably possessed heavily branched structures lined with both proximal and distal cell types, exhibiting tissue morphology and gene expression consistent with the developing human lung. More recently, a highly branched bronchioalveolar organoid (BALO) was established by 3D culturing FACS-enriched murine bronchioalveolar stem cells with resident fibroblasts and macrophages [10]. Single-cell sequencing confirmed that the cellular makeup of BALO was comparable to that of the native bronchioalveolar compartment in mouse lung. There are a few other co-culture systems that highlight the benefits of mesenchyme involvement. For example, an hPSC-derived cardio-pulmonary co-differentiated organoid system strikingly found expedited alveolar maturation in the company of cardiac mesoderm [34]. Further, hPSC-derived lung cells cultured with M1 and M2 macrophages to model inflammatory responses during SARS-COV-2 infection lead to the discovery of an interesting potential therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 involving M2 macrophages [105]. Research on other organ systems have also drawn on the idea of leveraging mesenchymal cells to generate more functional organoids. For instance, it was reported that the incorporation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) can drive vascularization in hPSC-derived liver tissues [106]. The benefits of hMSC-driven self-condensation was later demonstrated in other organ models as well, including intestine, heart, kidney, brain, and especially the lung [107].

The pulmonary mesenchyme has been reported as the source of a complex signaling cascade regulating several key developmental events, including respiratory lineage specification, branching morphogenesis, and epithelial differentiation [103, 104]. The contributions from the pulmonary mesenchyme are so important, that strategies utilizing mesenchyme-derived growth factors, small molecule regulators of these growth factor signaling, or direct cellular co-culture have been developed to mimic this interaction during in vitro stem cell differentiation. Additionally, research on many pulmonary diseases such as asthma, which specifically target the mesenchymal compartment of the conducting airway, the airway smooth muscle, would benefit greatly from an in vitro multi-lineage organoid model [108]. While participation from non-epithelial pulmonary cell types is noticeably rare in most current lung organoid systems, this leaves much to look forward to in this field.

Engineering cell–matrix interactions to optimize the in vitro stem cell niche

In the era of multi-omics, our understanding of the lung extracellular matrix (ECM) and its composition is continuously evolving. The lung ECM broadly comprises a network of collagen and elastin fibers enriched with proteoglycans (PGs), glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and fibronectin [109].

It is immediately obvious that the ECM provides an elaborate framework that maintains structural integrity during lung organogenesis. However, it also plays a critical role in defining stem cell fate and maturation of the lung [20, 110]. The pulmonary ECM is a nexus of biochemical and mechanical cues that instructs stem cell behavior during lung development and regeneration [111]. For instance, proteoglycans found in the basement membrane ECM mediates FGF10 signaling that directs branching point specification during branching morphogenesis of rodent lungs [112, 113]. Similarly, the deposition of the structural protein elastin, especially in areas of the alveolus that are points for future alveolar crests is a driving force for secondary septation that occurs during alveolarization of the developing lung [114]. Laminin alpha5, an important component of the alveolar basement membrane also plays a critical role in directing alveolar epithelial cell maturation in the developing murine lung [115]. Inspired by native ECM, several attempts have been made to engineer matrices for in vitro stem cell maintenance and directed differentiation into pulmonary lineage. For instance, conditioned medium secreted by 804G cells is a popular source of laminin and collagen for in vitro expansion of airway basal stem cells [116, 117]. Additionally, Matrigel, a commercially available product comprising laminin, collagen IV and heparan sulfate proteoglycans isolated from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm (EHS) sarcoma is commonly used either as a coating in 2D culture or as a hydrogel scaffold in 3D culture to direct stem cell differentiation into alveolar and airway epithelial lineages [31, 60, 118]. Alternatively, a 3D matrix of collagen I can also be applied to facilitate stem cell differentiation into multiple pulmonary epithelial lineages [29].

The composition of ECM also dictates its stiffness; proteins such as collagen and fibronectin influence tensile strength while elastin accounts for elastic recoil [119]. ECM stiffness has been shown to regulate stem cell differentiation through mechanosensing [120]. This is observed during murine lung development as the basement membrane is thinner at the epithelial buds than the surrounding ECM, generating a stiffness gradient that ultimately directs branching morphogenesis [121, 122]. While the lung stem cell field is due for more comprehensive studies exploring the effects of substate stiffness and matrix composition on in vitro hPSC differentiation into the pulmonary lineage, one recent study that investigated in vitro lung progenitor specification on two-dimensional (2D) Gelatin and Matrigel vs 3D Matrigel hinted at a preference for the less-stiff 3D Matrigel substrate [46]. There has also been a special focus on engineering lung ECM-specific hydrogels to recapitulate the stiffness and composition of the native lung [123, 124].

Advances in biomaterial engineering and fabrication also presents the potential for further improvement in recapitulating cell–matrix interactions and organotypic tissue architectures of the lung. Whole-organ decellularization provides a platform for lung cell engraftment in lung-specific ECM and spatial specific cell seeding into the alveolar and vascular compartments [125,126,127,128]. Technology developments in additive manufacturing have also facilitated the fabrication of ECM scaffolds that more closely recapitulate native lung architecture. Specifically, solubilized bioinks prepared from purified or decellularized ECM materials can potentially be 3D printed alongside desired cell populations to generate scaffolds or cellular tissue grafts of desired geometries [129,130,131]. Moreover, signaling molecules, such as growth factors and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), can be incorporated to further functionalize ECM biomaterials via enzymatic or chemoselective approaches to generate a signaling reservoir to modulate cellular differentiation and tissue morphogenesis [129, 132]. One of the greatest challenges lies in achieving temporal and spatial specific delivery of signaling molecules with high resolution, like during branching morphogenesis of the native lung, when the ECM establishes a unique pattern for Fgf10 signaling gradient via differential Fgf10 expression of mesenchymal cells, promoting branching morphogenesis (Fig. 2). While some initial attempts have shown the possibility to achieve spatial-specific biomaterial functionalization (Fig. 2b) [133], their eventual implementation in engineering complex tissues such as the lung will require extensive future advancements from both scientific and engineering investigations.

A deeper understanding of ECM dynamics accompanying lung cell induction and tissue formation offers the promise to further boost our ability to modulate cell-ECM interactions for directed lung tissue morphogenesis. The ECM microarray technique enables high-throughput screening of multiple combinations of ECM components by generating thousands of different artificial niches for testing stem cell responses [134]. With the rapid development of mass spectrometry, the proteomic analysis of stem cell niche starts to contribute to the identification of novel proteins from the matrisome (ECM and ECM-associated proteome) that promote stem cell differentiation. With higher resolution and sensitivity in characterizing matrisome dynamics, key ECM factors may be discovered for optimizing the extracellular stem cell niche in vitro.

Concluding remarks

Lung development is a complex but highly coordinated process regulated by a considerable number of signals and pathways. These signals are produced and secreted by cells in the epithelium and mesenchyme, serving as cues to modulate lineage-specific gene expression, guide cell migration, and specify cell fates.

As discussed earlier, many seminal attempts have been made to direct hPSCs differentiation in vitro by recapitulating key programs of native lung development [27, 31,32,33, 72]. Many of these protocols are based on inducing the signals found in vivo in a temporally specific, stepwise manner. While these innovative efforts cannot be understated, there is still more to be investigated. For instance, very little is understood about directing in vitro hPSC differentiation into AEC1, a cell type that facilitates the most prominent function of the lungs, gas exchange. Generally, features such as gene expression, morphology, and functionality are assessed in combination to identify cells in vitro. The lack of an established functionality assay also potentially hinders the optimization of hPSC differentiation into AEC1. Additionally, the goal of interfacing tissue engineered lung epithelium with a perfusable vascular component remains an area of active exploration.

In vivo lung stem cells behaviors are highly regulated by their microenvironments, comprising cell–cell interactions and cell-ECM interactions. Several multi-lineage co-cultures and ECM systems have been established to improve the biomimicry of in vitro stem cell models. However, there remains a critical need to expand our understanding of these interactions during both native and engineered lung morphogenesis to improve our ability to engineer lung stem cell niches. For instance, characterizing cell type-specific secretome in multi-lineage culture systems can reveal how cells interact with one another. Additionally, studying ECM dynamics during native lung organogenesis can lead to the discovery of novel extracellular factors that can promote stem cell differentiation or their integration into higher order tissue structures.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Human pluripotent stem cells


Extracellular matrix


Type 1 alveolar epithelial cells


Type 2 alveolar epithelial cells


Bronchio-alveolar stem cells


Embryonic stem cells


Induced pluripotent stem cells


Transforming Growth Factor-β


Definitive endoderm








Bone morphogenetic protein 4


Retinoic acid


Fibroblast growth factor 4


Anterior foregut endoderm


Dickkopf-related protein 1


Epidermal Growth Factor


Keratinocyte Growth Factor


Cyclic adenosine monophosphate


Fluorescence activated cell sorting






Bronchioalveolar organoid


Mitogen-activated protein kinase


Air–liquid interface




Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator


Primary ciliary dyskinesia








  1. Hawkins F, Rankin SA, Kotton DN, Zorn AM. The genetic programs regulating embryonic lung development and induced pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Fetal Neonatal Lung Dev. 2016;1–21.

  2. Rackley CR, Stripp BR. Building and maintaining the epithelium of the lung. J Clin Investig. 2012;122(8):2724–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Li J, Tang N. Alveolar stem cells in lung development and regrowth. Lung Stem Cells in Development, Health and Disease (ERS Monograph) Sheffield. Eur Respir Soc. 2021;17–30.

  4. Pan H, Deutsch GH, Wert SE, Ontology S. Comprehensive anatomic ontologies for lung development: a comparison of alveolar formation and maturation within mouse and human lung. J Biomed Semant. 2019;10(1):18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller AJ, Spence JR. In vitro models to study human lung development. Dis Homeost Physiol (Bethesda). 2017;32(3):246–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rock JR, Onaitis MW, Rawlins EL, Lu Y, Clark CP, Xue Y, et al. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(31):12771–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nikolic MZ, Sun D, Rawlins EL. Human lung development: recent progress and new challenges. Development. 2018;145(16):56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, Lawrence S, Babar I, Vogel S, et al. Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell. 2005;121(6):823–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JH, Bhang DH, Beede A, Huang TL, Stripp BR, Bloch KD, et al. Lung stem cell differentiation in mice directed by endothelial cells via a BMP4-NFATc1-thrombospondin-1 axis. Cell. 2014;156(3):440–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vazquez-Armendariz AI, Heiner M, El Agha E, Salwig I, Hoek A, Hessler MC, et al. Multilineage murine stem cells generate complex organoids to model distal lung development and disease. EMBO J. 2020;39(21):e103476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Q, Liu K, Cui G, Huang X, Yao S, Guo W, et al. Lung regeneration by multipotent stem cells residing at the bronchioalveolar-duct junction. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):728–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Danopoulos S, Alonso I, Thornton ME, Grubbs BH, Bellusci S, Warburton D, et al. Human lung branching morphogenesis is orchestrated by the spatiotemporal distribution of ACTA2, SOX2, and SOX9. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2018;314(1):L144–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nikolic MZ, Caritg O, Jeng Q, Johnson JA, Sun D, Howell KJ, et al. Human embryonic lung epithelial tips are multipotent progenitors that can be expanded in vitro as long-term self-renewing organoids. Elife. 2017;6.

  14. Miller AJ, Hill DR, Nagy MS, Aoki Y, Dye BR, Chin AM, et al. In vitro induction and in vivo engraftment of lung bud tip progenitor cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10(1):101–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Wert G, Mummery C. Human embryonic stem cells: research, ethics and policy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(4):672–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ortuno-Costela MDC, Cerrada V, Garcia-Lopez M, Gallardo ME. The challenge of bringing iPSCs to the patient. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24).

  17. Ikonomou L, Wagner DE, Gilpin SE, Weiss DJ, Ryan AL. Technological advances in study of lung regenerative medicine:perspective from the 2019 Vermont lung stem cell conference. Cytotherapy. 2020;22(10):519–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beers MF, Moodley Y. When is an alveolar type 2 cell an alveolar type 2 cell? A conundrum for lung stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2017;57(1):18–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen F, Fine A. Stem cells in lung injury and repair. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(10):2544–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertoncello I. Stem cells in the lung: development, repair and regeneration. New York: Springer; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Diekmann U, Lenzen S, Naujok O. A reliable and efficient protocol for human pluripotent stem cell differentiation into the definitive endoderm based on dispersed single cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(2):190–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Amour KA, Agulnick AD, Eliazer S, Kelly OG, Kroon E, Baetge EE. Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to definitive endoderm. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(12):1534–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H, Luo X, Yao L, Lehman DM, Wang P. Improvement of cell survival during human pluripotent stem cell definitive endoderm differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(21):2536–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahabian A, Dahlmann J, Martin U, Olmer R. Production and cryopreservation of definitive endoderm from human pluripotent stem cells under defined and scalable culture conditions. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(3):1581–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Green MD, Chen A, Nostro MC, d’Souza SL, Schaniel C, Lemischka IR, et al. Generation of anterior foregut endoderm from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(3):267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kearns NA, Genga RM, Ziller M, Kapinas K, Peters H, Brehm MA, et al. Generation of organized anterior foregut epithelia from pluripotent stem cells using small molecules. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11(3):1003–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hawkins F, Kramer P, Jacob A, Driver I, Thomas DC, McCauley KB, et al. Prospective isolation of NKX2-1-expressing human lung progenitors derived from pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(6):2277–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Longmire TA, Ikonomou L, Hawkins F, Christodoulou C, Cao Y, Jean JC, et al. Efficient derivation of purified lung and thyroid progenitors from embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(4):398–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodrigues Toste de Carvalho AL, Liu HY, Chen YW, Porotto M, Moscona A, Snoeck HW. The in vitro multilineage differentiation and maturation of lung and airway cells from human pluripotent stem cell-derived lung progenitors in 3D. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(4):1802–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang SX, Islam MN, O’Neill J, Hu Z, Yang YG, Chen YW, et al. Efficient generation of lung and airway epithelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):84–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacob A, Morley M, Hawkins F, McCauley KB, Jean JC, Heins H, et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into functional lung alveolar epithelial cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21(4):472-88.e10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hawkins FJ, Suzuki S, Beermann ML, Barilla C, Wang R, Villacorta-Martin C, et al. Derivation of airway basal stem cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(1):79-95.e8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kanagaki S, Ikeo S, Suezawa T, Yamamoto Y, Seki M, Hirai T, et al. Directed induction of alveolar type I cells derived from pluripotent stem cells via Wnt signaling inhibition. Stem Cells. 2021;39(2):156–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng WH, Johnston EK, Tan JJ, Bliley JM, Feinberg AW, Stolz DB, et al. Recapitulating human cardio-pulmonary co-development using simultaneous multilineage differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. Elife. 2022;11.

  35. Schilders KA, Eenjes E, van Riet S, Poot AA, Stamatialis D, Truckenmuller R, et al. Regeneration of the lung: Lung stem cells and the development of lung mimicking devices. Respir Res. 2016;17:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghaedi M, Niklason LE, Williams J. Development of lung epithelium from induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr Transplant Rep. 2015;2(1):81–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wells JM, Melton DA. Early mouse endoderm is patterned by soluble factors from adjacent germ layers. Development. 2000;127(8):1563–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zorn AM, Wells JM. Vertebrate endoderm development and organ formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:221–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Dollé P, Cardoso WV, Niederreither K. Retinoic acid regulates morphogenesis and patterning of posterior foregut derivatives. Dev Biol. 2006;297(2):433–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rankin SA, Han L, McCracken KW, Kenny AP, Anglin CT, Grigg EA, et al. A retinoic acid-hedgehog cascade coordinates mesoderm-inducing signals and endoderm competence during lung specification. Cell Rep. 2016;16(1):66–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kiyokawa H, Morimoto M. Molecular crosstalk in tracheal development and its recurrence in adult tissue regeneration. Dev Dyn. 2021;250(11):1552–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kadzik RS, Morrisey EE. Directing lung endoderm differentiation in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(4):355–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mullassery D, Smith NP. Lung development. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015;24(4):152–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Burri PH. Fetal and postnatal development of the lung. Annu Rev Physiol. 1984;46:617–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Goss AM, Tian Y, Tsukiyama T, Cohen ED, Zhou D, Lu MM, et al. Wnt2/2b and beta-catenin signaling are necessary and sufficient to specify lung progenitors in the foregut. Dev Cell. 2009;17(2):290–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ikonomou L, Herriges MJ, Lewandowski SL, Marsland R 3rd, Villacorta-Martin C, Caballero IS, et al. The in vivo genetic program of murine primordial lung epithelial progenitors. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kimura S, Hara Y, Pineau T, Fernandez-Salguero P, Fox CH, Ward JM, et al. The T/ebp null mouse: thyroid-specific enhancer-binding protein is essential for the organogenesis of the thyroid, lung, ventral forebrain, and pituitary. Genes Dev. 1996;10(1):60–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hui CC, Slusarski D, Platt KA, Holmgren R, Joyner AL. Expression of three mouse homologs of the Drosophila segment polarity gene cubitus interruptus, Gli, Gli-2, and Gli-3, in ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues suggests multiple roles during postimplantation development. Dev Biol. 1994;162(2):402–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Li Y, Gordon J, Manley NR, Litingtung Y, Chiang C. Bmp4 is required for tracheal formation: a novel mouse model for tracheal agenesis. Dev Biol. 2008;322(1):145–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Goss AM, Morrisey EE. Wnt signaling and specification of the respiratory endoderm. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(1):10–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Harris-Johnson KS, Domyan ET, Vezina CM, Sun X. beta-Catenin promotes respiratory progenitor identity in mouse foregut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(38):16287–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Domyan ET, Ferretti E, Throckmorton K, Mishina Y, Nicolis SK, Sun X. Signaling through BMP receptors promotes respiratory identity in the foregut via repression of Sox2. Development. 2011;138(5):971–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Que J, Okubo T, Goldenring JR, Nam KT, Kurotani R, Morrisey EE, et al. Multiple dose-dependent roles for Sox2 in the patterning and differentiation of anterior foregut endoderm. Development (Cambridge, England). 2007;134(13):2521–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Que J, Luo X, Schwartz RJ, Hogan BL. Multiple roles for Sox2 in the developing and adult mouse trachea. Development (Cambridge, England). 2009;136(11):1899–907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Jones MR, Chong L, Bellusci S. Fgf10/Fgfr2b signaling orchestrates the symphony of molecular, cellular, and physical processes required for harmonious airway branching morphogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:620667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen F, Cao Y, Qian J, Shao F, Niederreither K, Cardoso WV. A retinoic acid-dependent network in the foregut controls formation of the mouse lung primordium. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(6):2040–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Fernandes-Silva H, Araújo-Silva H, Correia-Pinto J, Moura RS. Retinoic acid: a key regulator of lung development. Biomolecules. 2020;10(1).

  58. Magro-Lopez E, Palmer C, Manso J, Liste I, Zambrano A. Effects of lung and airway epithelial maturation cocktail on the structure of lung bud organoids. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Serra M, Alysandratos KD, Hawkins F, McCauley KB, Jacob A, Choi J, et al. Pluripotent stem cell differentiation reveals distinct developmental pathways regulating lung-versus thyroid-lineage specification. Development. 2017;144(21):3879–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Hoe Ng W, Johnston EK, Jie Tan J, Bliley JM, Feinberg AW, Stolz DB, et al. Recapitulate human cardio-pulmonary co-development using simultaneous multilineage differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.03.03.433714.

  61. Metzger RJ, Klein OD, Martin GR, Krasnow MA. The branching programme of mouse lung development. Nature. 2008;453(7196):745–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Abler LL, Mansour SL, Sun X. Conditional gene inactivation reveals roles for Fgf10 and Fgfr2 in establishing a normal pattern of epithelial branching in the mouse lung. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(8):1999–2013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Bellusci S, Grindley J, Emoto H, Itoh N, Hogan BL. Fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) and branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Development. 1997;124(23):4867–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Danopoulos S, Shiosaki J, Al AD. FGF signaling in lung development and disease: human versus mouse. Front Genet. 2019;10:170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Danopoulos S, Thornton ME, Grubbs BH, Frey MR, Warburton D, Bellusci S, et al. Discordant roles for FGF ligands in lung branching morphogenesis between human and mouse. J Pathol. 2019;247(2):254–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Alanis DM, Chang DR, Akiyama H, Krasnow MA, Chen J. Two nested developmental waves demarcate a compartment boundary in the mouse lung. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ishii Y, Rex M, Scotting PJ, Yasugi S. Region-specific expression of chicken Sox2 in the developing gut and lung epithelium: regulation by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Dev Dyn. 1998;213(4):464–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gontan C, de Munck A, Vermeij M, Grosveld F, Tibboel D, Rottier R. Sox2 is important for two crucial processes in lung development: branching morphogenesis and epithelial cell differentiation. Dev Biol. 2008;317(1):296–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Herriges M, Morrisey EE. Lung development: orchestrating the generation and regeneration of a complex organ. Development. 2014;141(3):502–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Chao CM, Moiseenko A, Zimmer KP, Bellusci S. Alveologenesis: key cellular players and fibroblast growth factor 10 signaling. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2016;3(1):17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Morrisey EE, Hogan BL. Preparing for the first breath: genetic and cellular mechanisms in lung development. Dev Cell. 2010;18(1):8–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. McCauley KB, Hawkins F, Serra M, Thomas DC, Jacob A, Kotton DN. Efficient derivation of functional human airway epithelium from pluripotent stem cells via temporal regulation of WNT signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(6):844-57.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Volckaert T, Campbell A, Dill E, Li C, Minoo P, De Langhe S. Localized Fgf10 expression is not required for lung branching morphogenesis but prevents differentiation of epithelial progenitors. Development. 2013;140(18):3731–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Riemondy KA, Jansing NL, Jiang P, Redente EF, Gillen AE, Fu R, et al. Single cell RNA sequencing identifies TGFbeta as a key regenerative cue following LPS-induced lung injury. JCI Insight. 2019;5.

  75. Ulich TR, Yi ES, Longmuir K, Yin S, Biltz R, Morris CF, et al. Keratinocyte growth factor is a growth factor for type II pneumocytes in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(3):1298–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Xu J, Tian J, Grumelli SM, Haley KJ, Shapiro SD. Stage-specific effects of cAMP signaling during distal lung epithelial development. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(50):38894–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Frank DB, Peng T, Zepp JA, Snitow M, Vincent TL, Penkala IJ, et al. Emergence of a wave of WNT signaling that regulates lung alveologenesis by controlling epithelial self-renewal and differentiation. Cell Rep. 2016;17(9):2312–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Mou H. Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar type II heterogeneity: revealed by SFTPC expression. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2021;65(4):345–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Sun YL, Hurley K, Villacorta-Martin C, Huang J, Hinds A, Gopalan K, et al. Heterogeneity in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar epithelial type II cells revealed with ABCA3/SFTPC reporters. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2021;65(4):442–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Kawada H, Shannon JM, Mason RJ. Improved maintenance of adult rat alveolar type II cell differentiation in vitro: effect of serum-free, hormonally defined medium and a reconstituted basement membrane. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1990;3(1):33–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Katsura H, Sontake V, Tata A, Kobayashi Y, Edwards CE, Heaton BE, et al. Human lung stem cell-based alveolospheres provide insights into SARS-CoV-2-mediated interferon responses and pneumocyte dysfunction. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27(6):890-904.e8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Chen YW, Huang SX, de Carvalho A, Ho SH, Islam MN, Volpi S, et al. A three-dimensional model of human lung development and disease from pluripotent stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(5):542–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Cunniff B, Druso JE, van der Velden JL. Lung organoids: advances in generation and 3D-visualization. Histochem Cell Biol. 2021;155(2):301–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Franks TJ, Colby TV, Travis WD, Tuder RM, Reynolds HY, Brody AR, et al. Resident cellular components of the human lung: current knowledge and goals for research on cell phenotyping and function. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(7):763–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Barkauskas CE, Chung MI, Fioret B, Gao X, Katsura H, Hogan BL. Lung organoids: current uses and future promise. Development. 2017;144(6):986–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Stokes AB, Kieninger E, Schogler A, Kopf BS, Casaulta C, Geiser T, et al. Comparison of three different brushing techniques to isolate and culture primary nasal epithelial cells from human subjects. Exp Lung Res. 2014;40(7):327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Goh KJ, Tan EK, Lu H, Roy S, Dunn NR. An NKX2-1(GFP) and TP63(tdTomato) dual fluorescent reporter for the investigation of human lung basal cell biology. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Konishi S, Gotoh S, Tateishi K, Yamamoto Y, Korogi Y, Nagasaki T, et al. Directed induction of functional multi-ciliated cells in proximal airway epithelial spheroids from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;6(1):18–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Benali R, Tournier JM, Chevillard M, Zahm JM, Klossek JM, Hinnrasky J, et al. Tubule formation by human surface respiratory epithelial cells cultured in a three-dimensional collagen lattice. Am J Physiol. 1993;264(2 Pt 1):L183–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Sachs N, Papaspyropoulos A, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heo I, Bottinger L, Klay D, et al. Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling. EMBO J. 2019;38(4):2564.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Sette G, Lo Cicero S, Blacona G, Pierandrei S, Bruno SM, Salvati V, et al. Theratyping cystic fibrosis in vitro in ALI culture and organoid models generated from patient-derived nasal epithelial conditionally reprogrammed stem cells. Eur Respir J. 2021;58(6):542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Berical A, Lee RE, Lu J, Beermann ML, LeSeur JA, Mithal A, et al. A multimodal iPSC platform for cystic fibrosis drug testing. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.06.21.448578.

  93. van der Vaart J, Bottinger L, Geurts MH, van de Wetering WJ, Knoops K, Sachs N, et al. Modelling of primary ciliary dyskinesia using patient-derived airway organoids. EMBO Rep. 2021;22(12):e52058.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Lee DDH, Cardinale D, Nigro E, Butler CR, Rutman A, Fassad MR, et al. Higher throughput drug screening for rare respiratory diseases: readthrough therapy in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J. 2021;58(4).

  95. Wijesekara P, Yadav P, Perkins LA, Stolz DB, Franks JM, Watkins SC, et al. Engineering rotating apical-out airway organoid for assessing respiratory cilia motility. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.01.15.476455.

  96. Tadokoro T, Wang Y, Barak LS, Bai Y, Randell SH, Hogan BL. IL-6/STAT3 promotes regeneration of airway ciliated cells from basal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(35):E3641–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Rackley CR, Bowie EJ, Keene DR, Stripp BR, et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J Clin Investig. 2013;123(7):3025–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Gotoh S, Ito I, Nagasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Konishi S, Korogi Y, et al. Generation of alveolar epithelial spheroids via isolated progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;3(3):394–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Han Y, Duan X, Yang L, Nilsson-Payant BE, Wang P, Duan F, et al. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors using lung and colonic organoids. Nature. 2021;589(7841):270–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Tindle C, Fuller M, Fonseca A, Taheri S, Ibeawuchi SR, Beutler N, et al. Adult stem cell-derived complete lung organoid models emulate lung disease in COVID-19. Elife. 2021;10.

  101. Lamers MM, van der Vaart J, Knoops K, Riesebosch S, Breugem TI, Mykytyn AZ, et al. An organoid-derived bronchioalveolar model for SARS-CoV-2 infection of human alveolar type II-like cells. EMBO J. 2021;40(5):e105912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Valdoz JC, Franks NA, Cribbs CG, Jacobs DJ, Dodson EL, Knight CJ, et al. Vascular lung triculture organoid via soluble extracellular matrix suspension. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.09.16.460165.

  103. McCulley D, Wienhold M, Sun X. The pulmonary mesenchyme directs lung development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015;32:98–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Fang S, Zhang S, Dai H, Hu X, Li C, Xing Y. The role of pulmonary mesenchymal cells in airway epithelium regeneration during injury repair. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Duan F, Guo L, Yang L, Han Y, Thakur A, Nilsson-Payant BE, et al. Modeling COVID-19 with human pluripotent stem cell-derived cells reveals synergistic effects of anti-inflammatory macrophages with ACE2 inhibition against SARS-CoV-2. Res Sq. 2020.

  106. Takebe T, Sekine K, Enomura M, Koike H, Kimura M, Ogaeri T, et al. Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nature. 2013;499(7459):481–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Takebe T, Enomura M, Yoshizawa E, Kimura M, Koike H, Ueno Y, et al. Vascularized and complex organ buds from diverse tissues via mesenchymal cell-driven condensation. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16(5):556–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Janssen LJ, Killian K. Airway smooth muscle as a target of asthma therapy: history and new directions. Respir Res. 2006;7:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Balestrini JL, Niklason LE. Extracellular matrix as a driver for lung regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(3):568–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Busch SM, Lorenzana Z, Ryan AL. Implications for extracellular matrix interactions with human lung basal stem cells in lung development, disease, and airway modeling. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:645858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Burgstaller G, Oehrle B, Gerckens M, White ES, Schiller HB, Eickelberg O. The instructive extracellular matrix of the lung: basic composition and alterations in chronic lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(1).

  112. Schuger L, Skubitz AP, Gilbride K, Mandel R, He L. Laminin and heparan sulfate proteoglycan mediate epithelial cell polarization in organotypic cultures of embryonic lung cells: evidence implicating involvement of the inner globular region of laminin beta 1 chain and the heparan sulfate groups of heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Dev Biol. 1996;179(1):264–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Izvolsky KI, Shoykhet D, Yang Y, Yu Q, Nugent MA, Cardoso WV. Heparan sulfate-FGF10 interactions during lung morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2003;258(1):185–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. McGowan SE. Extracellular matrix and the regulation of lung development and repair. FASEB J. 1992;6(11):2895–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Nguyen NM, Kelley DG, Schlueter JA, Meyer MJ, Senior RM, Miner JH. Epithelial laminin alpha5 is necessary for distal epithelial cell maturation, VEGF production, and alveolization in the developing murine lung. Dev Biol. 2005;282(1):111–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Levardon H, Yonker LM, Hurley BP, Mou H. Expansion of airway basal cells and generation of polarized epithelium. Bio Protoc. 2018;8(11).

  117. Yonker LM, Pazos MA, Lanter BB, Mou H, Chu KK, Eaton AD, et al. Neutrophil-derived cytosolic PLA2α contributes to bacterial-induced neutrophil transepithelial migration. J Immunol. 2017;199(8):2873–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Kleinman HK, McGarvey ML, Liotta LA, Robey PG, Tryggvason K, Martin GR. Isolation and characterization of type IV procollagen, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan from the EHS sarcoma. Biochemistry. 1982;21(24):6188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Burgess JK, Mauad T, Tjin G, Karlsson JC, Westergren-Thorsson G. The extracellular matrix—the under-recognized element in lung disease? J Pathol. 2016;240(4):397–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Smith LR, Cho S, Discher DE. Stem cell differentiation is regulated by extracellular matrix mechanics. Physiology (Bethesda). 2018;33(1):16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Handorf AM, Zhou Y, Halanski MA, Li WJ. Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis. 2015;11(1):1–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Moore KA, Polte T, Huang S, Shi B, Alsberg E, Sunday ME, et al. Control of basement membrane remodeling and epithelial branching morphogenesis in embryonic lung by Rho and cytoskeletal tension. Dev Dyn. 2005;232(2):268–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. de Hilster RHJ, Sharma PK, Jonker MR, White ES, Gercama EA, Roobeek M, et al. Human lung extracellular matrix hydrogels resemble the stiffness and viscoelasticity of native lung tissue. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020;318(4):L698–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Pouliot RA, Link PA, Mikhaiel NS, Schneck MB, Valentine MS, Kamga Gninzeko FJ, et al. Development and characterization of a naturally derived lung extracellular matrix hydrogel. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(8):1922–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Ghaedi M, Le AV, Hatachi G, Beloiartsev A, Rocco K, Sivarapatna A, et al. Bioengineered lungs generated from human iPSCs-derived epithelial cells on native extracellular matrix. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(3):e1623–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Ott HC, Clippinger B, Conrad C, Schuetz C, Pomerantseva I, Ikonomou L, et al. Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat Med. 2010;16(8):927–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Gilpin SE, Ren X, Okamoto T, Guyette JP, Mou H, Rajagopal J, et al. Enhanced lung epithelial specification of human induced pluripotent stem cells on decellularized lung matrix. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1721–9 (discussion 9).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Petersen TH, Calle EA, Zhao L, Lee EJ, Gui L, Raredon MB, et al. Tissue-engineered lungs for in vivo implantation. Science. 2010;329(5991):538–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Xing Y, Varghese B, Ling Z, Kar AS, Jacome ER, Ren X. Extracellular matrix by design: native biomaterial fabrication and functionalization to boost tissue regeneration. Regener Eng Transl Medi. 2021;1–20.

  130. Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, Tashman JW, Hinton TJ, Yerneni S, et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 2019;365(6452):482–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Grigoryan B, Paulsen SJ, Corbett DC, Sazer DW, Fortin CL, Zaita AJ, et al. Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science. 2019;364(6439):458–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Singh A, Yadav CB, Tabassum N, Bajpeyee AK, Verma V. Stem cell niche: dynamic neighbor of stem cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2019;98(2–4):65–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Wylie RG, Ahsan S, Aizawa Y, Maxwell KL, Morshead CM, Shoichet MS. Spatially controlled simultaneous patterning of multiple growth factors in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater. 2011;10(10):799–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Flaim CJ, Chien S, Bhatia SN. An extracellular matrix microarray for probing cellular differentiation. Nat Methods. 2005;2(2):119–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The schematics were created using BioRender.


Department of Defense Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program W81XWH2110183 (X.R.). Z.L. is supported by China Scholarship Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



BV, ZL and XR wrote the manuscript. BV and ZL contributed equally to this manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi Ren.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varghese, B., Ling, Z. & Ren, X. Reconstructing the pulmonary niche with stem cells: a lung story. Stem Cell Res Ther 13, 161 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: