Skip to main content
Download PDF

Mesenchymal stem cells shift the pro-inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils to ameliorate acute lung injury

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 197 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment plays a major role in the management of acute lung injury (ALI), and neutrophils are the initial line of defense against ALI. However, the effect of MSCs on neutrophils in ALI remains mostly unknown.

Methods

We investigated the characteristics of neutrophils in lung tissue of ALI mice induced by lipopolysaccharide after treatment with MSCs using single-cell RNA sequencing. Neutrophils separated from lung tissue in ALI were co-cultured with MSCs, and then samples were collected for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry.

Results

During inflammation, six clusters of neutrophils were identified, annotated as activated, aged, and circulatory neutrophils. Activated neutrophils had higher chemotaxis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase scores than aged neutrophils. Circulatory neutrophils occurred mainly in healthy tissue and were characterized by higher expression of Cxcr2 and Sell. Activated neutrophils tended to exhibit higher expression of Cxcl10 and Cd47, and lower expression of Cd24a, while aged neutrophils expressed a lower level of Cd47 and higher level of Cd24a. MSC treatment shifted activated neutrophils toward an aged neutrophil phenotype by upregulating the expression of CD24, thereby inhibiting inflammation by reducing chemotaxis, ROS production, and NADPH oxidase.

Conclusion

We identified the immunosuppressive effects of MSCs on the subtype distribution of neutrophils and provided new insight into the therapeutic mechanism of MSC treatment in ALI.

Introduction

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a clinical syndrome characterized by bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, severe hypoxemia, and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. The most severe form of ALI is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). More than 10% of ARDS patients worldwide are admitted into intensive care units (ICUs), and severe ARDS has a mortality rate as high as 46% [1]. Despite decades of researches and numerous clinical trials, there are still no effective drugs for treating ARDS. Although several causes of ALI have been identified, including sepsis [2], transfusion [3], and trauma [4], in general ALI is the product of a disturbed inflammatory response that includes the accumulation of activated neutrophils. Many studies have elucidated the critical role of neutrophils in lung tissue during ALI [5,6,7]. Dysregulated neutrophilic inflammation can destroy lung endothelial and epithelial cells [8]. Activated neutrophils exhibit robust chemotaxis and adhesion, resulting in structural destruction, pulmonary circulation disruption and limitation of gaseous exchange when they rush into the lung tissue [2, 8]. Depletion of neutrophils reduces the severity of lung injury in mice [9]. Summers et al. propose that the therapeutic goal for neutrophil-associated ALI should be to reduce the adverse effects caused by activated neutrophils without damaging host immune defense [10]. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play the role of an immune regulator in acute liver injury [11], Crohn’s disease [12], and other diseases. MSCs also exert powerful therapeutic effects in ALI through immune regulation [13,14,15,16]. Since the COVID-19 pandemic broke out worldwide, numerous clinical trials investigating MSC therapy have been conducted, which have shown promising results for the treatment of ARDS [17,18,19]. The mechanism underlying the effect of MSCs on macrophages during inflammation has been well studied. MSCs reduce the number of M1 macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs), which inhibits antigen presentation [20]. MSCs produce several anti-inflammatory factors, such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [21], TSG-6 [22], and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1) [23], to promote the differentiation of alveolar macrophages into an M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype. Studies investigating the effects of MSCs on neutrophils are lacking, but generally it is thought that MSCs can reduce inflammation and enhance the phagocytosis of neutrophils [24,25,26]. Su et al. report that conditioned medium from MSCs induces lung tissue neutrophil apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI [24]. MSCs can enhance neutrophil phagocytosis function and clearance of bacteria [25]. Another study shows that exosomes and conditioned media from MSCs prolong normal neutrophil lifespan and phagocytosis function [26]. LPS-induced ALI has the classic pathological characteristics of ARDS, including infiltration of neutrophils and accumulation of protein-rich fluid in lung tissue [27, 28]. Neutrophils are markers for the therapeutic effects of MSCs in many cases [20, 29, 30]. Here, we perform a high-dimensional analysis of the heterogeneity and phenotypic variety of neutrophils that have infiltrated into lung tissue treated with MSCs using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq). To our knowledge, this is the first report on neutrophil heterogeneity and phenotypic changes in transcriptional and biological functions during LPS-induced ALI after MSC treatment. Characterization of lung neutrophil populations, and their phenotypes and functions, may promote understanding of the mechanisms underlying the immunoregulatory effects of MSCs in ALI, thus providing new insight into MSC therapy for ALI patients.

Methods and materials

Animal models of ALI and MSC treatment

All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (No: 2015-130). 6–8-week-old specific pathogen-free C57BL/6 male mice were utilized as models. All animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (95% oxygen and 5% isoflurane, RWD Inc., Shenzhen, China) inhalation and were euthanized by cervical dislocation when needed. LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the solution was administered intratracheally to mice at a concentration of 20 μg LPS per gram of body weight. After 4 h, PBS containing 2% mouse serum, with or without 5 × 105 compact bone-derived MSCs, was given intratracheally to MSC group and LPS group, respectively. There were 5, 10, and 10 mice in PBS group, LPS group, and MSC group, respectively. The characteristics of MSCs are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Detection of cytokine concentrations and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Mice among three groups were anesthetized and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs) were collected using BD Insyte Intravenous Catheters. 0.6 mL precooled PBS was used for gentle lavage of the lungs twice. The collected BALFs were centrifuged and the supernatants were stored at − 80 °C without thaw-freeze until the experiments. A LEGENDplex mouse cytokine and chemokine panel (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to detect the concentrations of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and CXCL1 in BALFs according to the manufacturer instructions. Cells in BALF were stained with Wright-Giemsa reagents (Baso, Zhuhai, China). The number of neutrophils per 200 cells was determined based on morphology.

Separation of immune cells in lung tissue

Mice were anesthetized and perfused transcardially with PBS until the blood had cleared from the lungs. Lung tissues were homogenized using Mouse Lung Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and GentleMACS™ Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec). The lung suspensions were then filtered through 70-µm cell strainer (Falcon, New York, MA, USA). After centrifugation, the pellets were resuspended in 5 mL of 40% Percoll (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) and centrifuged (450 g, 5 min, 4 °C). The pellets were then incubated in red blood cell lysis solution to remove erythrocytes. After washing twice with PBS, the pellets contained isolated lung immune cells.

Single-cell RNA sequencing

CD45+ cells were selected by positive immunoselection using anti-mouse CD45 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Cell viability was detected using trypan blue staining, and samples with viabilities > 95% were used for sequencing. Next, 1 × 106/mL separated lung CD45+ immune cells were resuspended in Dulbecco’s PBS (D-PBS) containing 0.04% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Then, the samples were loaded immediately onto a 10× Chromium Controller (10× Genomics, Pleasanton CA, USA). Libraries were constructed using the accompanying kit (10× Genomics). Individual cells were differentiated by barcode, and the expression of transcripts was identified by a unique molecular identifier (UMI). Complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries were sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

scRNA-seq data processing

Data quality was evaluated using FastQC (Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, UK), and the quality control of data was shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S2. CellRanger (10× Genomics) was adopted to map the sequencing reads based on the mm10 mouse transcriptome (org.Mm.eg.db, Bioconductor; https://bioconductor.org/). Raw data were combined using the R software package (ver. 3.6.1; R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria), and unless otherwise noted, downstream analyses were performed using the Seurat software package (ver. 3.1.2, Seurat, https://satijalab.org/seurat/). Neutrophil populations were separated from total cells; cells with 200–5000 unique genes and mitochondrial counts < 0.4% were selected for further analysis. The Normalizedata and Scaledata functions were applied using default parameters to remove the differences in sequencing depths across cells. Highly variable genes were evaluated using the FindVariableFeatures function by selecting 2000 genes with the “vst” method. Then, the variable genes were used for principal component analysis (PCA), performed with the RunPCA function. Next, we used the FindNeighbors (dims = 1:15) and FindClusters (resolution = 0.6) functions to cluster the neutrophils. The same principal components (1–15) were selected when using the RunTSNE function for reduction of the dimensions. The top 20 genes for each principal component are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S3, including many inflammatory genes such as Ccl3, Isg15, Cxcl10, and Ifitm1. The FindAllMarker function was used to obtain the marker genes for each cluster. The top 10 marker genes for each cluster are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Functional scores were defined by the AddModuleScore function. All of the genes used for scores are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2. A detailed description of other scRNA-Seq data processing is shown in Additional file 1: Supplementary Methods.

ROS measurement

ROS levels were measured using Reactive Oxygen Species Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Briefly, separated and cultured lung neutrophils were incubated with 5 μM 2′,7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) for 30 min at 37 °C and then observed using CytoFLEX LX (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) after washing. The data were analyzed by FlowJo software (Tree Star, OR, USA).

Western blot analysis

Lung neutrophils separated from LPS group and MSC group on day 3 were solubilized in RIPA lysis buffer (89,900, Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL, USA) with 1× phosphatase inhibitor (78,420, Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL, USA) and protease inhibitor (87,786, Thermo Fisher, Rockford, IL, USA). The protein concentrations were detected using BCA kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). The western blot was conducted as previously described [31]. NOX2 (SC-130543; Santa Cruz) and GAPDH (D16H11, Cell Signaling Technology) were used for primary antibody, and goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (ab6721; Abcam) and rabbit anti-mouse IgG H&L (HRP) (ab6728; Abcam) were used for secondary antibody. Details are described in the supplementary information (Additional file 1: Supplementary Methods).

Separation of lung neutrophils and cultured with MSCs

After separating lung immune cells, anti-mouse Ly6G microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) were used to enrich lung neutrophils. 1 × 106 purified neutrophils were cultured with or without 1 × 104 MSCs in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin–streptomycin, and 1 μg/mL LPS for 2 h. For paracrine effects, 1 × 106 neutrophils were cultured in the upper compartment (0.4 μm transwell insert) with or without 1 × 105 MSCs in the lower compartment for 3 h under 1 μg/mL LPS condition. Flow cytometry, ROS measurement, and RT-qPCR were performed after incubation.

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA), SPSS software package (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), Seurat R package, and clusterProfiler package. Student’s t test was performed to determine significance between two groups. For other comparisons, the statistical methods and corresponding packages were described in the previous section. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Additional methods

Details on the isolation, purification and differentiation of MSCs, animal models of ALI, lung histology, analysis of differentially expressed genes, scoring of biological processes, analysis of pseudotime trajectory, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence staining, western blot, and RT-qPCR were described in the Additional file 1: Supplementary Methods.

Results

Inflammation in ALI was alleviated after MSC treatment

MSCs derived from C57BL/6 mouse compact bone were administrated intratracheally after LPS treatment. The workflow is shown in Fig. 1A. On day 3, hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining showed that LPS induced cellulose deposition in the alveolar space, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and destruction of normal alveolar structures. On day 7 after LPS treatment, the alveolar structures were almost recovered, the cellulose had been absorbed, and the infiltration of inflammatory cells had been reduced. As expected, recovery was seen as early as day 3 in MSC group. Moreover, the infiltration of inflammatory cells was significantly reduced in MSC group, and the alveolar structures were similar to those of PBS group (Fig. 1B). LPS induced inflammatory conditions in BALF; the level of IL-6 was > 6000 pg/mL, IFN-γ was > 2000 pg/mL, and CXCL1, which could recruit neutrophils, was > 1000 pg/mL. The above cytokines and chemokines levels in BALF were reduced significantly on day 3 in MSC group (Fig. 1C). The concentrations of the acute inflammatory factors IL-6 and IFN-γ were reduced by MSC treatment after 7 days, but there was no significant decrease in the level of CXCL1 (Fig. 1C). Days 3 and 7 after LPS instillation represented the initial inflammatory and recovery phases, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Inflammation was reduced after MSC treatment. A Workflow. Lung tissues from mice in each group were collected, and lung immune cells were isolated by Percoll density gradient centrifugation. CD45+ cells were enriched using CD45 microbeads. scRNA-Seq was used to profile the cells, and after mapping the mouse immune genes, neutrophil subsets were extracted to explore their phenotypes. B Representative lung structures from each group. C The concentrations of IL-6, IFN-γ, and CXCL1 in BALF over time (n = 3). ns, no significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

Heterogeneity of neutrophils in ALI after MSC treatment

After employing bioinformatics algorithms, unbiased, graph-based clustering identified nine major neutrophil populations (Fig. 2A). The distributions of neutrophils were different among the three groups in the different phases (Fig. 2B, C): in PBS group, the number of neutrophils was initially small, but on day 3 after LPS treatment the number of neutrophils increased dramatically. As shown in Fig. 2B, the proportion of Cluster 1 was reduced, while that of Cluster 3 increased, in MSC group on day 3; however, changes in cell clusters were not obvious between LPS group and MSC group on day 7. Heterogeneity could also be identified based on the marker genes of each cluster (Fig. 2D). The proportions of Clusters 6–8 were relatively small and were characterized by high expression of Ighm, Cd79a, and Ms4a4b, which were likely expressed by B cells. Therefore, these three clusters were excluded from subsequent analyses.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Heterogeneity of neutrophils in ALI after MSC treatment. A Neutrophil subsets were extracted from the tSNE map (left). After re-clustering and tSNE dimensionality reduction, we uncovered the heterogeneity among lung neutrophils. The extracted neutrophils were divided into nine different clusters (right). B Proportions of the nine neutrophil clusters over time. C tSNE map over time. D Heatmap of the top 10 marker genes in each cluster

Full size image

Features of neutrophils in ALI after MSC treatment

Defining neutrophil phenotypes through aging-related genes

Next, the characteristics of these neutrophil populations were studied. Aging-related genes were differentially expressed among the neutrophil populations. Itga4 (encoding CD49d), Cxcr2 (encoding CXCR2, a molecule related to neutrophil chemotaxis [32]), and Sell (encoding CD62L, a migration molecule) were highly expressed in Clusters 4 and 5 (Fig. 3A). Cluster 5 was the predominant subgroup in the PBS group, and Cluster 4 appeared mainly on day 7 after treatment (Fig. 2B). These data suggested that on day 7 after treatment, there was a trend toward recovery along with the decreased concentrations of IL-6, IFN-γ, and CXCL1. Based on this information, these two clusters were annotated as circulatory neutrophils. In addition, Clusters 0 and 1 increased significantly on day 3 after LPS treatment. Cluster 0 expressed a high level of Cd47 (encoding a molecule that inhibits the clearance of dead neutrophils) and a low level of Cd24a (encoding a molecule that induces apoptosis after being crosslinked) (Fig. 3A). Cluster 1 expressed increased Cxcl10 (encoding CXCL10) and Icam1, so these two clusters were annotated as activated neutrophils. Cluster 2 highly expressed Cxcr4 (encoding a molecule that regulates neutrophil release from and return to bone marrow). Cluster 3 expressed a high level of Cd24a and had lower expression of Cd47. Based on Xie and colleagues’ research [33], aged neutrophils exhibit increased expression of CD24 and CXCR4 and reduced expression of CD47, so Clusters 2 and 3 were annotated as aged neutrophils.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Characterization of neutrophils in ALI after MSC treatment. A Heatmap of aging-related genes in neutrophils. B Heatmap showing the expression of neutrophil granule-related genes. C Violin plots of the relative expression of Cd24a, Cd47, Cxcr4, Cxcr2, and Sell. D Violin plots of azurophil, specific, gelatinase, and secretory scores for the six clusters. E Violin plots of chemotaxis, ROS production, and NADPH oxidase scores for the six clusters

Full size image

Expression of granule genes in each cluster

In addition to age-related genes, the expression of granule genes in each cluster was also evaluated. It was not surprising that Elane, Prtn3, and Mpo expression levels were the same in all clusters (Fig. 3B) as these genes were mainly expressed in neutrophils located in bone marrow [33], whereas the isolated neutrophils were derived from peripheral lung tissue. The activated neutrophils (Clusters 0 and 1) had higher expression of either specific or secretory granule genes. The aged neutrophils (Clusters 2 and 3) displayed lower expression of gelatinase granule genes; Cluster 3 also had lower expression of specific granule genes. The circulatory neutrophils (Clusters 4 and 5) highly expressed gelatinase granule genes such as Mmp8 and Mmp9. The relative expression levels of selected genes in each cluster are shown in Fig. 3C.

The biological functions of these clusters were further analyzed. The aged neutrophils (Clusters 2 and 3) had a higher azurophil score. The activated neutrophils (Clusters 0 and 1) had higher specific and secretory scores, while the circulatory neutrophils (Clusters 4 and 5) had a higher gelatinase score (Fig. 3D). In addition, the aged neutrophils had lower scores for chemotaxis, ROS production, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, while the activated neutrophils had higher chemotaxis, ROS production, and NADPH oxidase scores. The circulatory neutrophils had a higher chemotaxis score, probably due to the overexpression of Cxcr4, which drived them toward the bone marrow; they also had the lowest ROS production score (Fig. 3E).

Pseudotime trajectories of each cluster

Next, the annotated clusters were characterized using the monocle R package. As expected, the circulatory neutrophils (Clusters 4 and 5) and aged neutrophils (Clusters 2 and 3) were positioned at the opposite ends of the trajectory, that is, circulatory neutrophils were mainly in state 1, while the aged neutrophils were predominantly in states 6–8. The activated neutrophils were unevenly distributed in all states (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pseudotime trajectories of lung neutrophils in ALI after MSC treatment. A Monocle-guided cell trajectory of neutrophils colored from dark to light blue. The start of pseudotime was indicated by dark blue and the end of pseudotime by light blue. And the nodes represented branches of differentiation trajectories. B Analysis of the neutrophil distribution among the nine transcriptional states. Color bar graphs represent the frequency of nine states in each clusters. C, D Monocle-guided cell trajectory of neutrophils colored by 6 clusters (C) and 9 transcriptional states (D)

Full size image

Overall, circulatory neutrophils were found mainly in the PBS group and at the initiation of the pseudotime trajectory. The activated neutrophils showed a more pro-inflammatory phenotype than the aged neutrophils.

Changes in neutrophil transcription and biological functions on day 3 after MSC treatment

After analyzing the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between MSC and LPS groups on day 3, we discovered that MSC treatment mainly affected Clusters 1 and 3. As shown in Fig. 2B, the size of Cluster 1 was reduced, while that of Cluster 3 was increased on day 3 after MSC treatment. Interestingly, the marker genes for Cluster 1, such as Cxcl10, Ifi47, Rsad2, Gbp2, and Gbp5, were downregulated by MSCs (Fig. 5A, B), while those for Cluster 3, including Spp1, Mdm2, and Itpr2, were upregulated (Fig. 5A, C). The expression of Icam1 was also downregulated after MSC treatment, which was at a high level in Cluster 1 (Additional file 1: Table S3). The pathways between LPS group and MSC group, based on the downregulated DEGs on day 3, were analyzed by clusterProfiler. The downregulated DEGs were involved in some inflammatory pathways, such as antigen processing and presentation, the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor signaling pathway, phagosome and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway (Fig. 5D).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of MSC treatment on lung neutrophil transcriptional changes on day 3. A Volcano plot showing the DEGs in LPS versus MSC group. P value was calculated using the Wilcoxon test. Genes with P value < 0.05 and foldchange > 1.5 were selected. Blue and red dots represented genes downregulated and upregulated by MSCs, respectively. Marker genes for Clusters 1 and 3 were annotated. B Violin plots showing the relative expression of downregulated DEGs by MSCs in marker genes of Cluster 1. C Violin plots showing the relative expression of upregulated DEGs by MSCs in marker genes of Cluster 3. D Bubble chart showing the KEGG enrichment analysis of the top 30 functional DEGs between MSC and LPS groups on day 3 with a foldchange > 1.2 and P value < 0.05

Full size image

Neutrophil functions including the synthesis of granular proteins were inhibited after MSC treatment, apart from azurophil granules (Fig. 6A). NADPH oxidase score was also significantly downregulated by MSCs (Fig. 6B). Western blot analysis showed the level of NOX2 protein, which involved in NADPH oxidase and granule secretion [34], was decreased (Fig. 6C). After analyzing the expression of genes involved chemotaxis, we found that the lung neutrophil chemotaxis score was reduced after MSC treatment (Fig. 6D). At the same time, the number of neutrophils in BALF was reduced significantly after 3 days (Fig. 6E). The ROS production score was downregulated after MSC treatment (Fig. 6F). The lung neutrophil ROS level detected by DCFH-DA probe was decreased significantly (Fig. 6G, H). Biological function related genes, including chemokine gene Cxcl10, ROS-related gene Cybb (also named NOX2), and cell adhesion-related gene Icam1, were validated by RT-qPCR. The results of RT-qPCR showed that the expression of Cxcl10, Cybb, and Icam1 was significantly reduced on day 3 after MSC treatment (Fig. 6I).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The functional changes of lung neutrophils on day 3 after MSC treatment. Violin plots of azurophil, specific, gelatinase, and secretory scores (A); NADPH oxidase score (B); chemotaxis scores (D); ROS production scores (F) on day 3: LPS versus MSC group. C NOX2 protein levels in lung neutrophils were detected by WB analysis. Full-length blots were presented in Additional File 1: Figure S7. E Absolute numbers of neutrophils (n = 3) in lung over time. G Relative ROS levels were measured by DCFH-DA probe in separated lung neutrophil. H Bar plot showing mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of DCFH-DA probe (n = 4). I Bar plots showing the different expression of Cxcl10, Cybb, and Icam1 (n = 4). ns, no significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

Differential characteristics of clusters 1 and 3

Since MSC treatment mainly affected Clusters 1 and 3, we further analyzed the two clusters. An analysis of DEGs between activated neutrophils (Cluster 1) and aged neutrophils (Cluster 3) showed that Cxcl10 was the most upregulated gene among the activated neutrophils; in addition, other inflammation-related genes such as Isg15, Ifitm1, Ifitm3, and Ifi47 were also upregulated in Cluster 1. Interestingly, Cd274 (encoding PD-L1) was upregulated in Cluster 1 (Additional file 1: Fig. S4a, b). The upregulated genes in Cluster 1 were involved in inflammatory pathways, such as the NOD-like receptor, TNF, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways (Additional file 1: Fig. S4c). The upregulated genes in Cluster 3 were mainly involved in lysosome, spliceosome, and apoptosis pathways (Additional file 1: Fig. S4d). These results demonstrated that Cluster 1 had an activated inflammatory phenotype, while Cluster 3 had an aged phenotype.

The expression of CD24 on inflammatory neutrophils was upregulated by MSCs

The aged neutrophils (Cluster 3) expressed a higher level of Cd24a, and the number of cells in Cluster 3 was higher on day 3 in MSC group. Based on this, we examined whether the frequency of neutrophils expressing CD24 differed after MSC treatment. As expected, the proportion of CD24hi neutrophils was greatly increased in MSC group (Fig. 7A, B). Immunofluorescence staining also suggested that the expression of CD24 was increased after MSC therapy (Fig. 7C). Moreover, MSCs also inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory factor genes when co-cultured with inflammatory neutrophils in vitro. The expression of chemokine gene Cxcl10, ROS-related gene Cybb (NOX2), and cell adhesion-related gene Icam1 was significantly decreased after 2 h of co-culture with MSCs (Fig. 7D). The ROS levels were also downregulated by MSCs (Fig. 7E, F). Consistent with in vivo observations, the number of CD24hi neutrophils was increased after co-culture with MSCs (Fig. 7G, H). The expressions of Cxcl10, Cybb and Icam1 were downregulated and the ROS productions were decreased after cultured with MSCs using transwell assay (Additional file 1: Fig. S5). These findings indicated that MSC treatment shifted the pro-inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils by upregulating the expression of CD24 after 3 days.

Fig. 7
figure 7

MSC treatment shifted the neutrophil phenotype by upregulating the expression of CD24. A Representative flow cytometric dot plots showing the subpopulations of lung neutrophils defined by CD24 expression on day 3 in LPS versus MSC group. B Bar plot showing the proportion of CD24hi neutrophils in LPS versus MSC group (n = 4). C Distribution of lung neutrophils expressed CD24 on day 3 in LPS versus MSC group. Scale bar represents 25 µm. D Bar plots showing the expression of Cxcl10, Cybb, and Icam1 in vitro neutrophils co-cultured with or without MSCs (n = 3). E Relative ROS levels were measured by DCFH-DA probe in lung neutrophil after co-cultured with or without MSCs. F Bar plot showing MFI of DCFH-DA probe in lung neutrophil after co-cultured with or without MSCs (n = 3). G Representative flow cytometric dot plots showing subpopulations of lung neutrophils defined by CD24 co-cultured with or without MSCs (n = 3). H Bar plot showing the proportion of CD24hi neutrophils cultured in vitro with or without MSCs (n = 3). ns, no significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 unpaired Student’s t test

Full size image

MSC treatment reduced the number of activated neutrophils (Cluster 1), which had higher levels of specific, gelatinase, and secretory granules and increased chemotaxis, ROS production, and NADPH oxidase. At the same time, the number of aged neutrophils (Cluster 3), which exhibited reduced synthesis of granular proteins, chemotaxis, ROS production, and NADPH oxidase, was increased.

Neutrophil functional changes on day 7 after MSC treatment

As mentioned earlier, in terms of neutrophil cluster distribution, LPS group and MSC group were the most similar on day 7. However, the neutrophil phenotypes changed significantly between days 3 and 7 after LPS instillation, with aged neutrophils (Cluster 2) becoming the predominant phenotype on day 7 as shown in Additional file 1: Fig S6a. The number of DEGs on day 7 in LPS group and MSC group was minimal (Additional file 1: Fig. S6b, Table S4). To confirm whether neutrophil functionality had been changed on day 7 after MSC treatment, GSEA analysis was performed. The GSEA of KEGG pathways showed that phagosomes were activated in neutrophils on day 7 after MSC treatment (Additional file 1: Fig. S6c). GO biological processes, proteasomal ubiquitin-independent protein catabolic processes, and positive regulation of cell killing were activated in MSC group on day 7 (Additional file 1: Fig. S6d). On day 7, inflammation in the lungs was reduced to normal levels and the residual neutrophils in MSC group might have engulfed tissue cell fragments and broke down proteins, thereby helping to restore the damaged lung tissue.

Discussion

As reported, 15–30% hospitalized COVID-19 patients develop ARDS, and COVID‐19 ARDS is prone to worse outcomes than ARDS from other causes [35]. There is a 65.7–94% mortality rate in patients who received mechanical ventilation [36]. Accumulating preclinical researches [37, 38] and clinical trials [17, 19, 39] have shown that MSC therapy is a comprehensive treatment for ALI, and researches in the past 2 years have shown that MSC therapy can also improve the outcomes of patients with severe or critical COVID-19 [17,18,19]. Many indicators, such as the median time of hospital stay and symptoms remission, are shortened after MSC therapy. MSCs also modulate the immune system of patients with severe COVID-19. For example, the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and plasma pro-inflammatory cytokines are markedly decreased [17]. It has been reported that the pathological severity of ARDS induced by LPS is similar to that induced by COVID-19 [40]. Our study profiles neutrophils involved in LPS-induced lung injury and provide a novel mechanism by which MSCs can shift the pro-inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils by increasing CD24 expression.

First, we show that MSCs separated from C57BL/6 mice compact bone have therapeutic effects in LPS-induced ALI. IFN-γ and IL-6 are critical pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in acute inflammation. Researchers have identified a group of neutrophils expressing interferon-stimulated genes which are expanded during bacterial infection and gradually develop into aged neutrophils [33]. Plasma IL‐6 is a potential prognosis factors in COVID-19 severe patients and a vital factors between endothelial cells and neutrophils [41]. CXCL1 recruits neutrophils into lung tissue [42]. After MSC treatment, we observe not only restored lung tissue structure, but also decreased levels of IFN-γ, IL-6 and CXCL1 in BALF during the initial inflammatory phase.

After quality control, we reduce the data dimensionality and used tSNE algorithm to cluster cells. The genes associated with inflammation are in the top 20 genes in all dimensions, and nine different types of neutrophils are found. Because the proportions of Clusters 6–8 are minimal, and they exhibit high expression of Ighm, Cd79a, and Ms4a4b, which are likely expressed by B cells, these clusters are excluded from subsequent analyses.

Cxcr2, Sell, Mmp8, and Mmp9 are highly expressed in circulatory neutrophils (Cluster 5) in healthy tissue (PBS group). CXCR2hi neutrophils are mature neutrophils with high expression of gelatinase granule proteins [43], and MMP8 and MMP9 modulate epithelial and endothelial integrity to promote neutrophil transendothelial migration [44]. This suggests that neutrophils in healthy lung tissue are mature and act as supervisors to maintain immune homeostasis.

In the initial inflammatory phase (day 3 after LPS treatment), the heterogeneity of neutrophils is altered. There are three main clusters, two of which are activated neutrophils with high expression of Cxcl10 and granule genes; the other one consists of aged neutrophils. Surprisingly, the therapeutic effects of MSCs on day 3 are mainly attributed the activated neutrophils (Cluster 1) and aged neutrophils (Cluster 3).

Previous research has shown that effector functions, including phagocytosis and ROS production, are enhanced in neutrophils overexpressing ICAM-1 [45]. During sepsis, ICAM-1+ neutrophils increase in number and accumulate in lung tissue, leading to ARDS [46]. Blockade of Cybb (NOX2) can ameliorate LPS-induced inflammation [47]. It has been reported that CD24 inhibits the inflammatory response to injury [48], and Parlato and colleagues show that CD24 can significantly trigger neutrophil apoptosis [49]. Moreover, CD24 has been shown to be downregulated in the neutrophils of sepsis patients. A decreased CD24-mediated cytotoxic response and neutrophil death are also associated with downregulated expression of CD24. Wang et al. report that a delay in human neutrophil apoptosis can be caused by increased PD-L1 expression, leading to lung injury and increased mortality during sepsis [50]. IFN-γ can induce PD-L1 expression in neutrophils [51], and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are important in inflammatory neutrophils. Deng and colleagues report that neutrophils in lupus patients exhibit higher ISG activity [52], and the number of ISG-related neutrophils is increased in both humans and mice [33].

In the current study, the activated neutrophils (Cluster 1) express higher levels of Icam1, Cd24a, Cd274, and Isg15. Genes that are significantly downregulated by MSCs are the marker genes for Cluster 1, and the frequency of Cluster 1 cells is reduced after MSC treatment. MSCs have also been shown to reduce the expression of Cxcl10, Cybb, and Icam1 in vitro. These mechanisms may explain why, in our study, MSC treatment inhibits the inflammatory neutrophil phenotype in the initial inflammatory phase.

On the other hand, some of the genes significantly downregulated by MSCs are marker genes for Cluster 3, and an increase in the frequency of Cluster 3 neutrophils is observed in the initial inflammatory phase. Cluster 3 is displayed increased expression of CD24, and it has been reported in previous studies that CD24 has a negative effect on neutrophils [49]. In our flow cytometry data, we observe an increase in the number of CD24hi neutrophils after MSC treatment, and the expression of CD24 on inflammatory neutrophils is upregulated after MSC co-culture. These results suggest that the inflammatory neutrophil phenotype is shifted toward increased expression of CD24, which may be responsible for the therapeutic effects of MSC treatment in the initial inflammatory phase of LPS-induced ALI. In addition, the therapeutic effect of MSC treatment also includes a reduction in chemotaxis, ROS production, and NADPH oxidase, as well as the inhibition of specific and gelatinase granules, and secretory vesicles.

The types of neutrophils differ minimally on day 7 after MSC treatment, but their functions are different. Phagosomes, proteasomal ubiquitin-independent protein catabolic processes, and positive regulation of cell killing are activated in neutrophils after MSC treatment. The number of Cluster 2 neutrophils that highly expressed Cxcr4 increases significantly on day 7 after LPS treatment. CXCR4 may help clear aged neutrophils and impede neutrophil homing to the bone marrow [32, 53]. Xie et al. [33] describe that neutrophils with high expression of CXCR4 have an aged phenotype. Therefore, neutrophils exhibiting an aged phenotype and high Cxcr4 expression in the recovery phase of ALI may induce neutrophils to exit lung tissue to find “invaders” in other organs.

Regrettably, we have no the clinical patients to further study the functions of neutrophils in ALI after MSC treatment. Furthermore, basic experiments are needed to validate our neutrophil scRNA-Seq clustering data and identify which molecules enable MSCs to shift the pro-inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils (by upregulating the expression of CD24).

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data show that MSCs can ameliorate LPS-induced ALI. The neutrophils infiltrating into lung tissue are heterogeneous and can be divided into circulatory, activated, and aged neutrophils. MSC treatment shifts the activated neutrophil phenotype into an aged neutrophil phenotype by upregulating the expression of CD24, thereby reducing chemotaxis, ROS production, NADPH oxidation, and the secretion of granules, which ultimately facilitate the recovery of ALI. Our results provide new insight into the therapeutic mechanism of MSC treatment in ALI.

Availability of data and materials

We submitted the raw sequence data to the Genome Sequence Archive of the Beijing Institute of Genomics Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (accession number CRA003097), and publicly available at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa.

Abbreviations

ALI:

Acute lung injury

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BALF:

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DC:

Dendritic cell

DCFH-DA:

2′,7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

GO:

Gene ontology

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

HE:

Hematoxylin and eosin

ICUs:

Intensive care units

IFN-γ:

Interferon-γ

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

IMDM:

Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium

IGF1:

Insulin-like growth factor I

ISGs:

Interferon-stimulated genes

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

MSC:

Mesenchymal stem cell

NADPH:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PCA:

Principal component analysis

PGE2:

Prostaglandin E2

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

scRNA sequencing:

Single-cell RNA sequencing

UMI:

Unique molecular identifier

References

  1. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Park I, Kim M, Choe K, Song E, Seo H, Hwang Y, et al. Neutrophils disturb pulmonary microcirculation in sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(3):1800786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapur R, Kasetty G, Rebetz J, Egesten A, Semple JW. Osteopontin mediates murine transfusion-related acute lung injury via stimulation of pulmonary neutrophil accumulation. Blood. 2019;134(1):74–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu J, Guardado J, Hoffman R, Xu H, Namas R, Vodovotz Y, et al. IL33-mediated ILC2 activation and neutrophil IL5 production in the lung response after severe trauma: a reverse translation study from a human cohort to a mouse trauma model. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7):e1002365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee WL, Downey GP. Neutrophil activation and acute lung injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Juss JK, House D, Amour A, Begg M, Herre J, Storisteanu DML, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome neutrophils have a distinct phenotype and are resistant to phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(8):961–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang H, Liu J, Zhou Y, Qu M, Wang Y, Guo K, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate mA modification and regulates sepsis-associated acute lung injury by activating ferroptosis in alveolar epithelial cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(8):3337–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gill SE, Yamashita CM, Veldhuizen RAW. Lung remodeling associated with recovery from acute lung injury. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;367(3):495–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abraham E, Carmody A, Shenkar R, Arcaroli J. Neutrophils as early immunologic effectors in hemorrhage- or endotoxemia-induced acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;279(6):L1137–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Summers C. Chasing the “Holy Grail”: modulating neutrophils in inflammatory lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(2):131–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu J, Feng B, Xu Y, Zhu J, Feng X, Chen W, et al. Immunomodulatory effect of mesenchymal stem cells in chemical-induced liver injury: a high-dimensional analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):262.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang R, Yao Q, Chen W, Gao F, Li P, Wu J, et al. Stem cell therapy for Crohn’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matthay MA, Calfee CS, Zhuo H, Thompson BT, Wilson JG, Levitt JE, et al. Treatment with allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells for moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (START study): a randomised phase 2a safety trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(2):154–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simonson OE, Mougiakakos D, Heldring N, Bassi G, Johansson HJ, Dalen M, et al. In vivo effects of mesenchymal stromal cells in two patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4(10):1199–213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson JG, Liu KD, Zhuo H, Caballero L, McMillan M, Fang X, et al. Mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells for treatment of ARDS: a phase 1 clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(1):24–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yudhawati R, Amin M, Rantam FA, Prasetya RR, Dewantari JR, Nastri AM, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuate pulmonary inflammation and lung damage caused by highly pathogenic avian influenza A/H5N1 virus in BALB/c mice. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):823.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu R, Yan T, Feng Y, Liu Y, Cao H, Peng G, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell treatment improves outcome of COVID-19 patients via multiple immunomodulatory mechanisms. Cell Res. 2021;31(12):1244–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi L, Huang H, Lu X, Yan X, Jiang X, Xu R, et al. Effect of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells on lung damage in severe COVID-19 patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lanzoni G, Linetsky E, Correa D, Messinger Cayetano S, Alvarez RA, Kouroupis D, et al. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a double-blind, phase 1/2a, randomized controlled trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2021;10(5):660–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu J, Li P, Zhu J, Lin F, Zhou J, Feng B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunomodulation of recruited mononuclear phagocytes during acute lung injury: a high-dimensional analysis study. Theranostics. 2021;11(5):2232–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Silva JD, Lopes-Pacheco M, de Castro LL, Kitoko JZ, Trivelin SA, Amorim NR, et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid potentiates the therapeutic effects of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on lung and distal organ injury in experimental sepsis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):264.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang Q, Cheng X, Luo C, Yang S, Li S, Wang B, et al. Placental chorionic plate-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate severe acute pancreatitis by regulating macrophage polarization via secreting TSG-6. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ionescu L, Byrne RN, van Haaften T, Vadivel A, Alphonse RS, Rey-Parra GJ, et al. Stem cell conditioned medium improves acute lung injury in mice: in vivo evidence for stem cell paracrine action. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;303(11):L967–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Su VY-F, Lin C-S, Hung S-C, Yang K-Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium induces neutrophil apoptosis associated with inhibition of the NF-κB pathway in endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwon M-Y, Ghanta S, Ng J, Tsoyi K, Lederer JA, Bronson RT, et al. Expression of stromal cell-derived factor-1 by mesenchymal stromal cells impacts neutrophil function during sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(5):e409–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Taghavi-Farahabadi M, Mahmoudi M, Rezaei N, Hashemi SM. Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells exosomes and conditioned media increased neutrophil lifespan and phagocytosis capacity. Immunol Invest. 2021;50(8):1042–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dagvadorj J, Shimada K, Chen S, Jones HD, Tumurkhuu G, Zhang W, et al. Lipopolysaccharide induces alveolar macrophage necrosis via CD14 and the P2X7 receptor leading to interleukin-1α release. Immunity. 2015;42(4):640–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lv H, Yu Z, Zheng Y, Wang L, Qin X, Cheng G, et al. Isovitexin exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activities on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting MAPK and NF-κB and activating HO-1/Nrf2 pathways. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12(1):72–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JW, Fang X, Gupta N, Serikov V, Matthay MA. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of E. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(38):16357–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu J, Feng B, Xu Y, Chen W, Sheng X, Feng X, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate LPS-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting the proinflammatory function of Ly6C CD8 T cells. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):829.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Feng X-D, Zhou J-H, Chen J-Y, Feng B, Hu R-T, Wu J, et al. Long non-coding RNA SNHG16 promotes human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cell proliferation capacity through the PI3K/AKT pathway under hypoxia. World J Stem Cells. 2022;14(9):714–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin C, Burdon PCE, Bridger G, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Williams TJ, Rankin SM. Chemokines acting via CXCR2 and CXCR4 control the release of neutrophils from the bone marrow and their return following senescence. Immunity. 2003;19(4):583–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Xie X, Shi Q, Wu P, Zhang X, Kambara H, Su J, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(9):1119–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dömer D, Walther T, Möller S, Behnen M, Laskay T. Neutrophil extracellular traps activate proinflammatory functions of human neutrophils. Front Immunol. 2021;12:636954.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gibson PG, Qin L, Puah SH. COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): clinical features and differences from typical pre-COVID-19 ARDS. Med J Aust. 2020;213(2):54-56.e1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(7):934–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang D, Song D, Shi L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Zeng Y, et al. Mechanisms of interactions between lung-origin telocytes and mesenchymal stem cells to treat experimental acute lung injury. Clin Transl Med. 2020;10(8):e231.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dos Santos CC, Amatullah H, Vaswani CM, Maron-Gutierrez T, Kim M, Mei SHJ, et al. Mesenchymal stromal (stem) cell therapy modulates miR-193b-5p expression to attenuate sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(1):2004216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wick KD, Leligdowicz A, Zhuo H, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Mesenchymal stromal cells reduce evidence of lung injury in patients with ARDS. JCI Insight. 2021;6(12):e148983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Ani B, ShamsEldeen AM, Kamar SS, Haidara MA, Al-Hashem F, Alshahrani MY, et al. Lipopolysaccharide induces acute lung injury and alveolar haemorrhage in association with the cytokine storm, coagulopathy and AT1R/JAK/STAT augmentation in a rat model that mimics moderate and severe Covid-19 pathology. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2022;49(4):483–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hind LE, Ingram PN, Beebe DJ, Huttenlocher A. Interaction with an endothelial lumen increases neutrophil lifetime and motility in response to P. aeruginosa. Blood. 2018;132(17):1818–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Korbecki J, Barczak K, Gutowska I, Chlubek D, Baranowska-Bosiacka I. CXCL1: gene, promoter, regulation of expression, mRNA stability, regulation of activity in the intercellular space. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Evrard M, Kwok IWH, Chong SZ, Teng KWW, Becht E, Chen J, et al. Developmental analysis of bone marrow neutrophils reveals populations specialized in expansion, trafficking, and effector functions. Immunity. 2018;48(2):364-379.e8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Paris AJ, Liu Y, Mei J, Dai N, Guo L, Spruce LA, et al. Neutrophils promote alveolar epithelial regeneration by enhancing type II pneumocyte proliferation in a model of acid-induced acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016;311(6):L1062–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Yan H, Zhou H-F, Akk A, Hu Y, Springer LE, Ennis TL, et al. Neutrophil proteases promote experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm via extracellular trap release and plasmacytoid dendritic cell activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(8):1660–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang P, Li Y, Xie Y, Liu Y. Different faces for different places: heterogeneity of neutrophil phenotype and function. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:8016254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gandhirajan RK, Meng S, Chandramoorthy HC, Mallilankaraman K, Mancarella S, Gao H, et al. Blockade of NOX2 and STIM1 signaling limits lipopolysaccharide-induced vascular inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(2):887–902.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen G-Y, Tang J, Zheng P, Liu Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses. Science. 2009;323(5922):1722–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Parlato M, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F, Philippart F, Misset B, Adib-Conquy M, Cavaillon J-M. CD24-triggered caspase-dependent apoptosis via mitochondrial membrane depolarization and reactive oxygen species production of human neutrophils is impaired in sepsis. J Immunol. 2014;192(5):2449–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang J-F, Wang Y-P, Xie J, Zhao Z-Z, Gupta S, Guo Y, et al. Upregulated PD-L1 delays human neutrophil apoptosis and promotes lung injury in an experimental mouse model of sepsis. Blood. 2021;138(9):806–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Langereis JD, Pickkers P, de Kleijn S, Gerretsen J, de Jonge MI, Kox M. Spleen-derived IFN-γ induces generation of PD-L1-suppressive neutrophils during endotoxemia. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;102(6):1401–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Deng Y, Zheng Y, Li D, Hong Q, Zhang M, Li Q, et al. Expression characteristics of interferon-stimulated genes and possible regulatory mechanisms in lupus patients using transcriptomics analyses. EBioMedicine. 2021;70:103477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Suratt BT, Petty JM, Young SK, Malcolm KC, Lieber JG, Nick JA, et al. Role of the CXCR4/SDF-1 chemokine axis in circulating neutrophil homeostasis. Blood. 2004;104(2):565–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of OE Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) for their help in single-cell RNA sequencing analysis.

Funding

This research was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFA1105603), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 226-2022-00098, No. 2022ZFJH003) and Research Project of Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory (No. JNL-2022026C).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Rd., Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Bing Feng, Xudong Feng, Yingduo Yu, Haoying Xu, Qingqing Ye, Xinru Fang, Feiqiong Gao, Jian Wu, Qiaoling Pan, Jiong Yu, Guanjing Lang, Lanjuan Li & Hongcui Cao

  2. Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China

    Lanjuan Li

  3. National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, 79 Qingchun Rd., Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Bing Feng, Xudong Feng, Yingduo Yu, Haoying Xu, Qingqing Ye, Xinru Fang, Feiqiong Gao, Jian Wu, Qiaoling Pan, Jiong Yu, Guanjing Lang, Lanjuan Li & Hongcui Cao

  4. Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Aging and Physic-Chemical Injury Diseases of Zhejiang Province, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, 310003, China

    Qingqing Ye & Hongcui Cao

  5. Department of Chemistry, Duke University, 124 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA

    Ruitian Hu

Authors
  1. Bing Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xudong Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yingduo Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haoying Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingqing Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruitian Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xinru Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Feiqiong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Qiaoling Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jiong Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Guanjing Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lanjuan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hongcui Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BF, LL and HC contributed to the research conception and design. BF, XF, YY, HX, XF, QY, and QP performed the experiments. FG, BF, RH, JW, JY, and GL performed data analysis. BF and HC wrote the manuscript. All the authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongcui Cao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Title of the approved project: Study on the mechanisms of EGFP-labeled human placental mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for acute lung injury. Name of the institutional approval committee or unit: The Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Approval number: No: 2015-130. Date of approval: February 27, 2015. In addition, all the animal procedures were followed ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplemetary methods and Figure S1. Characteristics of MSCs; Figure S2. Quality control of single-cell RNA sequencing data; Figure S3. Heatmaps showing the top 20 genes of the 15 PCs; Figure S4. The differences between cluster 1 and 3; Figure S5. MSCs could inhibit neutrophils function through paracrine effects; Figure S6. The changes of lung neutrophil function between LPS group and MSC group on day 7; Figure S7. Results of western blot analysis showed that the levels of NOX2 protein were decreased after MSC treatment; Table S1. Top 10 marker genes of each cluster; Table S2. Functional signatures with gene list; Table S3. Results of differential gene expression analysis between LPS group and MSC group on day 3; Table S4. Results of differential gene expression analysis between LPS group and MSC group on day 7.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, B., Feng, X., Yu, Y. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells shift the pro-inflammatory phenotype of neutrophils to ameliorate acute lung injury. Stem Cell Res Ther 14, 197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03438-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03438-w

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512