Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immunoregulatory effects of multipotent adult progenitor cells in a porcine ex vivo lung perfusion model

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 8, Article number: 159 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is considered to be the end result of an inflammatory response targeting the new lung allograft after transplant. Previous research has indicated that MAPC cell therapy might attenuate this injury by its paracrine effects on the pro-/anti-inflammatory balance. This study aims to investigate the immunoregulatory capacities of MAPC cells in PGD when administered in the airways.

Methods

Lungs of domestic pigs (n = 6/group) were subjected to 90 minutes of warm ischemia. Lungs were cold flushed, cannulated on ice and placed on EVLP for 6 hours. At the start of EVLP, 40 ml of an albumin-plasmalyte mixture was distributed in the airways (CONTR group). In the MAPC cell group, 150 million MAPC cells (ReGenesys/Athersys, Cleveland, OH, USA) were added to this mixture. At the end of EVLP, a physiological evaluation (pulmonary vascular resistance, lung compliance, PaO2/FiO2), wet-to-dry weight ratio (W/D) sampling and a multiplex analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (2 × 30 ml) was performed.

Results

Pulmonary vascular resistance, lung compliance, PaO2/FiO2 and W/D were not statistically different at the end of EVLP between both groups. BAL neutrophilia was significantly reduced in the MAPC cell group. Moreover, there was a significant decrease in TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ in the BAL, but not in IFN-α; whereas IL-4, IL-10 and IL-8 were below the detection limit.

Conclusions

Although no physiologic effect of MAPC cell distribution in the airways was detected during EVLP, we observed a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines and neutrophils in BAL in the MAPC cell group. This effect on the innate immune system might play an important role in critically modifying the process of PGD after transplantation. Further experiments will have to elucidate the immunoregulatory effect of MAPC cell administration on graft function after transplantation.

Background

In the year 2016, lung transplantation has grown into a successful treatment option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. However, severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) still occurs in up to 30% of transplanted patients. And although there is a low mortality of PGD due to successful supportive therapy nowadays, patients with severe PGD have poorer long-term outcome and a higher risk for developing chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). PGD is the end result of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) attacking the integrity of the capillary-alveolar membrane leading to pulmonary edema and impaired oxygenation [1, 2]. It is based on an inflammatory cascade that is triggered by hypoxic stress and activation of donor macrophages, which attracts many recipient neutrophils to the donor lung upon reperfusion in the recipient chest. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells possess immunoregulatory capabilities and could therefore be of particular interest to attenuate PGD. They are already found to be a successful treatment option for patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome, which shares a similar inflammatory pathophysiology with PGD [3,4,5]. More specifically, pilot studies show that they can reduce IRI inherent to solid organ transplantation in the lung [6,7,8], but also in other organ systems [9, 10]. Here, their beneficial effects result from paracrine mechanisms and cell-cell interaction rather than engraftment and repair of diseased tissue [11]. An altered inflammatory balance, with a decrease in pro-inflammatory and increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines, is observed [6]. In hypoxic conditions, such as ischemic injury models, secretion of growth factors such as VEGF and ANG-1 can stimulate angiogenesis and tissue repair [8, 12]. Mordant et al. recently published their results on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) administration to a porcine donor lung on ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), which resulted in a reduction of interleukin (IL)-8, however, there was no effect on physiological parameters detected [13]. The role in a reduction of inflammatory cytokines in an acellular ex vivo perfusion set-up therefore still has to be unraveled.

There are two types of bone marrow-derived cells that are well characterized and could be good candidates for immunoregulation of the IRI pathophysiology: the mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and multipotent adult progenitor cell (MAPC) [14]. Both have similar immunoregulatory capabilities, but are characterized as individual cell types and adopt different phenotypes under certain culture conditions [15]. One of the most advantageous characteristics of the MAPC cells is their large proliferation capacity and low senescence. Therefore, large batches of stem cells can be produced from one healthy donor [16, 17]. A clinical-grade MAPC product (MultiStem®, Athersys, Cleveland, OH, USA) has been developed for phase I and II clinical testing. The MultiStem clinical-grade product is based on MAPC cell isolation and expansion protocols under good manufacturing practice conditions [18, 19]. Our previous research indicates that intratracheal administration of cells holds the greatest potential to reduce IRI based on a reduction in lung edema formation. However, after administration of 10 million MAPC cells in the airways, a physiological improvement of lung function was not detected nor was there an alteration in the inflammatory environment of the lung tissue. Therefore, in this study we increased the dosing regimen to an intermediate dose of 3.75 million/kg in order to investigate a physiological improvement of lung function and to study this mechanism based on immunoregulation. Also for other solid organ transplant research, this intermediate dosing regimen of 3.5–4.5 million cells/kg has led to an improved graft function after transplantation [4, 9, 10].

In order to administer these cells, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has been put forward as a treatment platform of ex vivo organ reconditioning. EVLP is a preservation technique of donor lungs in normothermic conditions, allowing for continuous evaluation of the donor lung by perfusing and ventilating the graft in an ex vivo lung perfusion device. EVLP allows for assessment of higher-risk donor lungs and might serve as the ideal platform for active treatment since donor and recipient remain unharmed, and the treatment effect can be immediately evaluated by interpretation of the physiological parameters [20, 21].

The immunoregulatory properties of MAPC cells have not been widely studied in preclinical large animal models and most preliminary theories of working mechanisms are based on in vitro and rodent models. Therefore, in this large animal study, we aim to investigate if MAPC cell delivery in the airways during EVLP (i.e., post-conditioning), can modulate the inflammatory process linked to IRI by immunoregulatory effects.

Methods

This experimental study was performed in compliance with the European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The principles of laboratory animal care published by the National Institute of Health Volume 25, No. 28 (revised 1996) were followed. Local ethics approval was obtained at the research institute (Animal Ethics Committee Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Belgium, NTS P043/2014).

Donor procedure

Domestic pigs Topig 20 (mean 40.8 kg) were divided into two groups (n = 6/group). Animals were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of 5 mg/kg Zoletil 100 (Virbac, Carros, France) and 3 mg/kg Xyl-M 2% (VMD, Arendonk, Belgium). Anaesthesia was maintained using 10 mg/kg/h propofol, 20 μg/kg/h fentanyl and intermittent boli of pancuronium 2 mg for muscle relaxation. Animals were intubated with a 7.0 mm endotracheal tube and ventilated (Aestiva 3000; GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Little Chalfont, UK) with a tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O and FiO2 of 30%. Respiratory rate (RR) was adjusted to the end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) (45–55 mmHg). Blood pressure was monitored invasively in the right carotid artery. All animals died of cardiac arrest, which was induced by direct electrical stimulation of the myocardium with an electrical pulse generator that led to ventricular fibrillation. Animals were disconnected from the ventilator when cardiac arrest was induced. Prior to cardiac arrest, all animals were heparinized with 300 IU/kg.

Following cardiac arrest in the donor, grafts were left untouched in the deceased donor for 90 minutes after which they were flushed antegradely with 50 ml/kg cold thromethamol-buffered OCS Solution (Transmedics, Andover, MA, USA). The heart-lung block was excised and a retrograde flush (1 L thromethamol-buffered OCS solution) was performed at the back table. Lungs were instrumented on ice for a short period of time (mean 64.4 minutes) while the XVIVO (Göteborg, Sweden) cannulas were secured in the pulmonary artery and atrial cuff. An 8.0-mm ET tube was secured in the trachea. The donor procedure was performed as previously described [22].

Multipotent adult progenitor cell preparation

Human MAPC cells were isolated by Athersys/Regenesys (Athersys, Cleveland, OH, USA; Regenesys, Heverlee, Belgium) from bone marrow of healthy volunteers. A research-grade variant of the clinical product was used: cells were cultured under the same medium conditions as MultiStem®, but not in a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) environment. Isolation and cultivation of the MAPC cells were based on previously published protocols [19, 23]. The Quantum Cell Expansion System (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA) was used for ex vivo expansion of large batches of MAPC. All cell batches were subjected to several quality control assays to test if all MAPC cell criteria were met. First of all, cell quality is assessed by measuring viability and plating efficiency post-thawing. Cells were thawed at a population doubling of 29.4 and had a post-thawing viability of ≥ 96%. Second, cells are identified using qPCR and flow cytometry to test both negative and positive markers [15, 24]. A tube formation assay is done to define the proangiogenic activity [25], a CFSE assay [26] is performed for evaluating the immunoregulatory capacity.

Ex vivo lung perfusion

Lungs are perfused ex vivo with an acellular albumin containing dextran solution. The production of the perfusate and technique of EVLP are performed as described previously [27]. After a 1-hour rewarming period and slow increase of the flow to 40% of the estimated cardiac output (calculated as 100 ml/kg) lungs were further perfused and evaluated for 6 hours in total. Once the outflow temperature reaches 34 °C, ventilation was started with 7 ml/kg tidal volume for 7 breaths/min with 5 cmH2O PEEP. In the CONTR group, 40 ml of acellular albumin (2.5%)-plasmalyte mixture was distributed with a bronchoscope throughout the lung when ventilation was started. In the MAPC cell group, 150 million MAPC cells were added to this mixture. The study protocol is outlined in Fig. 1. Cells were thawed, PBS washed and diluted in 40 ml of the albumin-plasmalyte mixture after confirming that the donor lungs were free of adhesions or infiltrates. During 6 hours of EVLP, dynamic lung compliance (Compl), oxygenation [partial oxygen pressure over fractional inspired oxygen concentration (PaO2/FiO2)] and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was recorded hourly.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study protocol with n = 6/group. BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, CONTR control group, EVPL ex vivo lung perfusion, MAPC multipotent adult progenitor cell

Full size image

Tissue sampling

At the end of the experiment, tissue samples were taken for histological evaluation and wet-to-dry-weight (W/D) ratio calculation (after 48 hours in the oven at 80 °C). Pathology samples are scored by an experienced pathologist (EV) for congestion, neutrophil influx and necrosis. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) with two times 30 cc saline 0.9% was performed in the right middle lobe. Pooled fractions were returned and a cytospin (100 μl) was stained with Diff-Quick (Dade Behring, Newark, NJ, USA) to perform total and differential cell counts. The BAL supernatant was analyzed with a porcine multiplex ELISA kit for IL-1β, IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, interferon (IFN)-γ, IFN-α and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The left lung was inflated at 25 cmH2O, frozen solid in the fumes of liquid nitrogen and scanned with Siemens Somaton CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Lung mass, volume, and density were measured on the basis of the computed tomography (CT) scan, using imaging software (Horos®) in which the lung is manually delineated and the number of voxels and mean density of the voxels within the volume is determined [28].

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) when depicting physiological variables in time or as a scatter plot with median and IQR when comparing variables at the end of the experiment (GraphPad Prism 4, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Mann-Whitney tests were conducted in GraphPad to compare data at the end of EVLP. We analyzed end-experimental parameters only to dichotomize between acceptable and non-acceptable lungs. Baseline parameters of the donor animals are described as median (25% QI – 75% QI) and are analyzed with the same statistical test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline

Baseline animal parameters and the perfusate are similar between both groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline animal parameters and perfusate composition
Full size table

Physiological assessment

Physiological parameters PVR, Compl, and PaO2/FiO2 are depicted over time (hours on EVLP) in panel a-c of Fig. 2. All data points are depicted as median +/- IQR.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Monitoring of PVR (a), Compl (b) and PaO2/FiO2 (c) during 6 hours of EVLP. The final assessment at the end of EVLP did not show any statistical difference between both groups for PVR (d), Compl (e) or PaO2/FiO2 (f). BAL bronchoalveolar lavage, Compl dynamic lung compliance, CONTR control group, EVPL ex vivo lung perfusion, MAPC multipotent adult progenitor cell, PaO 2 /FiO 2 partial oxygen pressure/fractional inspired oxygen concentration, PVR pulmonary vascular resistance

Full size image

Physiologic parameters at the end of EVLP, are depicted in panel d-f. No statistical differences were detected in PVR (p = 0.68), Compl (p = 0.22) or PaO2/FiO2 (p = 0.13) between the two groups.

Lung edema estimation

W/D of the tissue sample of the right lower lobe and CT density calculation of the left inflated frozen lung did not reveal a statistical difference between both groups (Fig. 3). Administration of 150 million stem cells did not result in attenuation of lung edema formation in the warm ischemic-injured porcine lungs.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Lung edema, estimated here with W/D and CT density, is not reduced in the MAPC cell group. Data are depicted as boxplot, and compared with a Mann-Whitney test. CONTR control group, CT computed tomography, MAPC multipotent adult progenitor cell, W/D wet-to-dry weight ratio

Full size image

Histology

No significant differences were detected in the injury scores for both groups for the presence of congestion (p = 0.92), necrotic cells (p = 0.70) or influx of neutrophils (p = 0.56) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

No differences were seen in the injury severity score for congestion, presence of necrosis, and neutrophils. CONTR control group, MAPC multipotent adult progenitor cell

Full size image

Inflammation bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Quantitative determination of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, IFN-α, and TNF-α in BAL fluid showed a significant reduction of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ while IFN-α was similar in both groups (Fig. 5). IL-4, IL-8, and IL-10 were below the detection limit.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Significant reduction of inflammatory markers TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ in BAL CONTR control group, IFN interferon, IL interleukin, MAPC multipotent adult progenitor cell, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha

Full size image

Cell pellet analysis of the returned fractions of the BAL fluid showed a trend toward reduction in total cell count in the MAPC cell group (p = 0.09). Also, differential cell count showed a significant reduction in neutrophils (p = 0.02). Results are depicted as median (25% QI – 75% QI) in Table 2.

Table 2 Total cell count (TCC) and differential cell count of BAL fluid cell pellet
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we report the immunoregulatory effects on pulmonary IRI, of MAPC cell administration in the airways. Distribution of 150 × 106 MAPC cells in the airways of warm-ischemic porcine donor lungs resulted in a decreased concentration of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ in the BAL supernatant. Also, a decreased percentage of neutrophils and a trend to a lower total cell count in the BAL cell pellet was observed. The attenuation of this inflammatory response to warm-ischemic injury, was not reflected by an improvement in physiologic parameters, histology or lung edema during EVLP assessment.

Up to now, bone marrow-derived MSC are most frequently used for immunoregulation of the inflammatory response to pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury [29, 30]. MAPC cells are also bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells and share many similarities with the MSC, however in different culture conditions they adapt different phenotypes [15]. The interest in the use of cellular treatment for ischemia-reperfusion injury results from in vitro evidence of their immunoregulatory capacities published in the last decade [31]. This immunoregulation is mainly described as the suppression of regulatory T cells in vitro [16] while the interaction with neutrophils, the most important effector cell in IRI, is largely unexplored. MSC and MAPC share similar immunoregulatory capabilities, although MAPC cells are found to be more potent compared to MSC in rhesus monkeys [32], human MSC and MAPC share similar immunoregulatory capabilities [23, 26, 33]. However, MAPC cell therapy is privileged over MSC for clinical translation since their low senescence and high population doubling allows for banking of large batches of cells from a single donor [15]. A clinical-grade product of MAPC, MultiStem, is produced by Athersys and is already being tested in phase I and II clinical trials (Athersys, Cleveland, OH, USA). Therefore, we chose this cell type as bone marrow-derived cellular treatment for attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation. Also, xenotransplantation and allotransplantation of these cells is thought to be safe due to a low expression of MHC I and lack of MHC II expression [14, 33]. These immune-privileged properties avoid recognition by the recipient’s immune system, and therefore, this immune mismatch is generally believed not to be an increased risk for patients.

We used a validated injury model with exposure of the lung graft to 90 minutes of warm ischemia [22]. This resulted in an accumulation of lung edema when perfused for 6 hours on EVLP, which is reflected by a high W/D (median 6.6 in CONTR) and high CT density (median 245 g/L in CONTR). An inflammatory cascade with infiltration of neutrophils was launched upon reperfusion of the donor lung on EVLP, even though we worked with an acellular perfusate. This is shown by an increased percentage of neutrophils in the BAL in the CONTR group (median 7.7% vs. 1.7%). Most likely, these cells were trapped in the microvasculature of the lung despite adequate antegrade and retrograde flush of the lung upon procurement. Also, general inflammatory markers such as TNF-α, IFN-γ, IFN-α, and IL-1β were increased in CONTR showing activation of the innate immune system with interaction of macrophages, lymphocytes, endothelial cells, and epithelial cells. A porcine multiplex analysis was used (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), however cross-reactivity between swine and human is very typical, therefore we did not use human-specific ELISA kits to get an insight into the inflammatory injury microenvironment of the lung.

While Mordant et al. could show an IL-8 reduction in the perfusate in their model of MSC therapy during EVLP [13], the detection limit of 0.56 pg/ml for IL-8 was not reached in our BAL sample. Therefore, we cannot speculate on the effect on IL-8 and its neutrophil chemotaxis effect. We did report a reduction in general inflammatory markers involved in the innate immune system, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-γ, and saw a significant reduction in neutrophils in the BAL sample. While these immunoregulatory effects are highly significant, they were not reflected by an improved graft function on EVLP evaluation. The exact effect of this immunoregulatory effect, therefore, has to be further unraveled in a transplant experiment where the lung graft is reperfused with a pulsatile flow of whole blood and the full impact of IRI can be studied.

In our model, MAPC cells were administered in the airways. This route of administration is based on the pathological findings of ischemia-reperfusion injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, which share a similar pathophysiology. In the acute phase of IRI, epithelial denudation leads to loss of the epithelial cell layer over much of the basal membrane (in combination with lesser endothelial damage such as cell swelling, widening of the intercellular junctions, and increased number of pinocytotic vesicles) [34, 35]. Since diffuse alveolar damage in the acute phase is thus primarily based on epithelial cell injury, we aimed at targeting the epithelial side of the alveolar membrane with our cellular therapy.

Also, dose-response studies will have to be further conducted to determine the maximal effect. In this study, an intermediate dose of 3.75 million MAPC/kg body weight was administered. In mice studies, 0.5 to 2 million cells are usually administered, which corresponds to 100 to 200 million cells/kg. These doses are probably irrelevant for clinical practice since we also have to watch out for entrapment of these large cells (15–19 μm) in the microvasculature of the lung with microthrombi formation, increased PVR and hydrostatic pulmonary edema as potential dangerous consequence. A low dose of 0.24 million cells/kg has been shown not to be effective to tackle IRI as reported by our group previously [36]. It might therefore be that one should be looking for an optimal dose instead of a linear dose-response effect. A dose-response study would therefore be much more insightful to distinguish between low efficacy or underdosing of our investigated therapy in this experimental animal model.

La Francesca et al. previously investigated the effect of MAPC instillation in the airways to improve lung quality for transplantation [7]. However, in their study, MAPC cells were instilled in the left lower lobe while the right lower lobe was used as control. Due to perfusion differences between the left and right lung on EVLP, we often see that after prolonged EVLP the left lung is macroscopically better preserved than the right lung. Therefore, we wanted to investigate the effect of MAPC cells instilled in the airways with two different test groups rather to use the right lower lobe as a control.

Finally, we acknowledge that biodistribution of our cells could not be shown. Entrapment and localization of the administered cells will have to be investigated to understand the underlying mechanisms of the immunoregulatory capacities of cellular therapy.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we can state that, although no physiologic effect of immunoregulation was detected during EVLP, we did observe a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines and neutrophils in the BAL after MAPC cell distribution in the airways indicating a regulatory effect on the innate immune system. This effect might play an important role in critically modifying the process of PGD early after transplantation [37]. The innate immune system is also involved in the etiology of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) [38], and therefore MAPC cell administration early in the process of lung transplantation might have an effect on the development of BOS, the main predictor of long-term outcome. Further experiments will have to elucidate the effect of MAPC cell administration on graft function after transplantation.

Abbreviations

BAL:

Bronchoalveolar lavage

BOS:

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Ca:

Calcium

Cl:

Chloride

CLAD:

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Compl:

Dynamic lung compliance

CT:

Computed tomography

ETCO2 :

End-tidal carbon dioxide

EVLP:

Ex vivo lung perfusion

HR:

Heart rate

IFN:

Interferon

IL:

Interleukin

IQR:

Interquartile range

IRI:

Ischemia-reperfusion injury

K:

Potassium

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

MAPC:

Multipotent adult progenitor cell

MSC:

Mesenchymal stem cell

Na:

Sodium

PaO2/FiO2 :

Partial oxygen pressure over fractional inspired oxygen concentration

Peak AwP:

Peak airway pressure

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

PGD:

Primary graft dysfunction

PVR:

Pulmonary vascular resistance

RR:

Respiratory rate

TCC:

Total cell count

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TV:

Tidal volume

W/D:

Wet-to-dry weight ratio

WBC:

White blood cell count

References

  1. de Perrot M, Liu M, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S. Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:490–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Christie JD, Carby M, Bag R, Corris P, Hertz M, Weill D. Report of the ISHLT working group on primary lung graft dysfunction part II: definition. A consensus statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:1454–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rojas M, Cárdenes N, Kocyildirim E, Tedrow JR, Cáceres E, Deans R, et al. Human adult bone marrow-derived stem cells decrease severity of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in sheep. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Horie S, Laffey JG. Recent insights: mesenchymal stromal/stem cell therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome. F1000Research. 2016;5:1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JW, Fang X, Gupta N, Serikov V, Matthay MA. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of E. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:16357–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tian W, Liu Y, Zhang B, Dai X, Li G, Li X, et al. Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells protects lung transplants from cold ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Lung. 2015;193:85–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. La Francesca S, Ting AE, Sakamoto J, Rhudy J, Bonenfant NR, Borg ZD, et al. Multipotent adult progenitor cells decrease cold ischemic injury in ex vivo perfused human lungs: an initial pilot and feasibility study. Transplant Res. 2014;3:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang X, Neyrinck AP, Matthay MA, Lee JW. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells restore epithelial protein permeability in cultured human alveolar type II cells by secretion of angiopoietin-1. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:26211–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanazawa H, Fujimoto Y, Teratani T, Iwasaki J, Kasahara N, Negishi K, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury in a rat model. Gaetano C, editor. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19195.

  10. Lange C, Tögel F, Ittrich H, Clayton F, Nolte-Ernsting C, Zander AR, et al. Administered mesenchymal stem cells enhance recovery from ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute renal failure in rats. Kidney Int. 2005;68:1613–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinclair K, Yerkovich ST, Chambers DC. Mesenchymal stem cells and the lung. Respirology. 2013;18:397–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Markel TA, Crafts TD, Jensen AR, Hunsberger EB, Yoder MC. Human mesenchymal stromal cells decrease mortality after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury. J Surg Res. 2015;199:56–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mordant P, Nakajima D, Kalaf R, Iskender I, Maahs L, Behrens P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell treatment is associated with decreased perfusate concentration of interleukin-8 during ex vivo perfusion of donor lungs after 18-hour preservation. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2016;35:1245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohni A, Verfaillie CM. Multipotent adult progenitor cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011;24:3–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roobrouck VD, Clavel C, Jacobs SA, Ulloa-Montoya F, Crippa S, Sohni A, et al. Differentiation potential of human postnatal mesenchymal stem cells, mesoangioblasts, and multipotent adult progenitor cells reflected in their transcriptome and partially influenced by the culture conditions. Stem Cells. 2011;29:871–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs SA, Pinxteren J, Roobrouck VD, Luyckx A, van’t Hof W, Deans R, et al. Human multipotent adult progenitor cells are nonimmunogenic and exert potent immunomodulatory effects on alloreactive T-cell responses. Cell Transplant. 2013;22:1915–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boozer S, Lehman N, Lakshmipathy U, Love B, Raber A, Maitra A, et al. Global characterization and genomic stability of human MultiStem, a multipotent adult progenitor cell. J Stem Cells. 2009;4:17–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vaes B, Walbers S, Gijbels K, Craeye D, Deans R, Pinxteren J, et al. Culturing protocols for human multipotent adult stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1235:49–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cypel M, Keshavjee S. Extending the donor pool: rehabilitation of poor organs. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015;25:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Raemdonck D, Neyrinck A, Cypel M, Keshavjee S. Ex-vivo lung perfusion. Transpl Int. 2015;28:643–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martens A, Boada M, Vanaudenaerde BM, Verleden SE, Vos R, Verleden GM, et al. Steroids can reduce warm ischemic reperfusion injury in a porcine donation after circulatory death model with ex vivo lung perfusion evaluation. Transpl Int. 2016;29:1237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Plessers J, Dekimpe E, Van Woensel M, Roobrouck VD, Bullens DM, Pinxteren J, et al. Clinical-grade human multipotent adult progenitor cells block CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5:1607–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs SA, Roobrouck VD, Verfaillie CM, Van Gool SW. Immunological characteristics of human mesenchymal stem cells and multipotent adult progenitor cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91:32–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehman N, Cutrone R, Raber A, Perry R, Van’t Hof W, Deans R, et al. Development of a surrogate angiogenic potency assay for clinical-grade stem cell production. Cytotherapy. 2012;14:994–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reading JL, Yang JHM, Sabbah S, Skowera A, Knight RR, Pinxteren J, et al. Clinical-grade multipotent adult progenitor cells durably control pathogenic T cell responses in human models of transplantation and autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2013;190:4542–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Martens A, Montoli M, Faggi G, Katz I, Pype J, Vanaudenaerde BM, et al. Argon and xenon ventilation during prolonged ex vivo lung perfusion. J Surg Res. 2016;201:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Verleden SE, Vasilescu DM, Willems S, Ruttens D, Vos R, Vandermeulen E, et al. The site and nature of airway obstruction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Am Thorac Soc. 2014;189:292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Devaney J, Horie S, Masterson C, Elliman S, Barry F, O’Brien T, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells decrease the severity of acute lung injury induced by E. coli in the rat. Thorax. 2015;70:625–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gotts JE, Matthay MA. Mesenchymal stem cells and acute lung injury. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27:719–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Glenn JD, Whartenby KA. Mesenchymal stem cells: emerging mechanisms of immunomodulation and therapy. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6:526–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sindberg GM, Lindborg BA, Wang Q, Clarkson C, Graham M, Donahue R, et al. Comparisons of phenotype and immunomodulatory capacity among rhesus bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, multipotent adult progenitor cells, and dermal fibroblasts. J Med Primatol. 2014;43:231–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobs SA, Plessers J, Pinxteren J, Roobrouck VD, Verfaillie CM, Van Gool SW. Mutual interaction between human multipotent adult progenitor cells and NK cells. Cell Transplant. 2014;23:1099–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sato M, Hwang DM, Ohmori-Matsuda K, Chaparro C, Waddell TK, Singer LG, et al. Revisiting the pathologic finding of diffuse alveolar damage after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:354–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Castro CY. ARDS and diffuse alveolar damage: a pathologist’s perspective. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;18:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Martens A, Vanaudenaerde B, Verleden S, Vos R, Van Raemdonck D, Verleden G, et al. Multipotent adult progenitor stem cell administration in a porcine model of ex vivo lung perfusion. Transpl Int. 2015;28:224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kreisel D, Goldstein DR. Innate immunity and organ transplantation: focus on lung transplantation. Transpl Int. 2013;26:2–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gracon ASA, Wilkes DS. Lung transplantation: chronic allograft dysfunction and establishing immune tolerance. Hum Immunol. 2014;75:887–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. Nicole Jannis for her help in co-ordinating all experiments and her expert help during the experiments; and Miss Eleonore Neumann and Miss Sofie Mingneau for their technical assistance during the experiments.

Funding

R.V. is funded by the University Hospitals Leuven (Klinisch onderzoeksfonds) and the FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek KAN2014 1.5.139.14). S.E.V. is also funded by the FWO (12G 8715N). B.M.V. is funded by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (C24/050). A.P.N. is funded by the University Hospitals Leuven (Klinisch onderzoeksfonds) and D.V.R. is funded by the FWO (G.3C04.99). D.S. and S.C. are funded by the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Program Financing PF/10/018) and the Foundation Dormeur (Vaduz).

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from ReGenesys BVBA but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with the permission of ReGenesys BVBA.

Authors’ contributions

AM and SO performed the experimental work and did the data collection. AM and SEV performed the statistical analysis. The authors thank EV for scoring and interpreting of all histological samples, and thank DS and SC for performing and interpreting the multiplex cytokine analysis. AM, BMB, RV, and APN did the final data interpretation. SEV, GMV, RV, AM, APN, BMV, VR, and DVR contributed to the conception and design of the study and did the final revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

None of the funding sources have been involved in data collection, data processing or data interpretation. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Local ethics approval was obtained at the research institute (NTS P043/2014) to perform animal research.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Algology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    An Martens, Sofie Ordies & Arne P. Neyrinck

  2. Leuven Lung Transplant Unit, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    An Martens, Sofie Ordies, Bart M. Vanaudenaerde, Stijn E. Verleden, Robin Vos, Dirk E. Van Raemdonck, Geert M. Verleden & Arne P. Neyrinck

  3. Laboratory of Pneumology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Lung Transplant Unit, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Bart M. Vanaudenaerde, Stijn E. Verleden, Robin Vos & Geert M. Verleden

  4. Laboratory of Experimental Thoracic Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Dirk E. Van Raemdonck

  5. ReGenesys BVBA, Leuven, Belgium

    Valerie D. Roobrouck

  6. Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy (Rega Institute), Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Sandra Claes & Dominique Schols

  7. Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Eric Verbeken

  8. Stem Cell Institute Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Catherine M. Verfaillie

Authors
  1. An Martens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sofie Ordies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bart M. Vanaudenaerde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stijn E. Verleden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robin Vos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dirk E. Van Raemdonck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Geert M. Verleden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Valerie D. Roobrouck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sandra Claes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dominique Schols
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Eric Verbeken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Catherine M. Verfaillie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Arne P. Neyrinck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An Martens.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martens, A., Ordies, S., Vanaudenaerde, B.M. et al. Immunoregulatory effects of multipotent adult progenitor cells in a porcine ex vivo lung perfusion model. Stem Cell Res Ther 8, 159 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0603-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0603-5

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512