Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Review
  • Open Access

Emerging role of F-box proteins in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cells in human cancers

Stem Cell Research & Therapy201910:124

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1222-0

  • Published:

Abstract

Emerging evidence shows that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a crucial role in tumor invasion, metastasis, cancer stem cells, and drug resistance. Data obtained thus far have revealed that F-box proteins are critically involved in the regulation of the EMT process and stem cell differentiation in human cancers. In this review, we will briefly describe the role of EMT and stem cells in cell metastasis and drug resistance. We will also highlight how numerous F-box proteins govern the EMT process and stem cell survival by controlling their downstream targets. Additionally, we will discuss whether F-box proteins involved in drug resistance are associated with EMT and cancer stem cells. Targeting these F-box proteins might be a potential therapeutic strategy to reverse EMT and inhibit cancer stem cells and thus overcome drug resistance in human cancers.

Keywords

  • EMT
  • F-box protein
  • Cancer
  • Stem cells
  • Drug resistance
  • Metastasis

Background

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a molecular reprogramming cellular process that is characterized by transition of polarized immotile epithelial cells to motile mesenchymal cells and that involves phenotypic changes [1]. This process is required for tissue remodeling during embryonic development [2]. Subsequently, it has been reported that EMT contributes pathologically to cancer progression, as tumor cells exhibit increased migratory and invasive abilities [2]. During this transition, the expression of epithelial proteins that enhance cell-cell adhesion such as E-cadherin and γ-catenin is decreased, while the expression of mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, N-cadherin, and fibronectin as well as the activity of some matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are increased [3]. Furthermore, cancer cells are able to obtain cancer stem cell (CSC) features through induction of EMT [4], which has become a major cause of tumor relapse and metastasis [5] and results in increased resistance to chemo- and immunotherapies.

EMT has been found to be induced by multiple signaling regulators, including Snail, Twist, and zinc-finger E-box-binding (ZEB) transcription factors [6, 7]. As these transcription factors have distinct expression profiles, their contributions to EMT depend on the cancer cell type or specific tumor tissues involved [8]. Moreover, many oncogenic signaling pathways trigger the initiation and progression of EMT. For example, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling is the most well-characterized pathway that promotes EMT in a variety of human cancer cells [9]. Similarly, Wnt, Akt, Hedgehog, Notch, RTK, matrix metalloproteinases, hypoxia, and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) have also been confirmed to induce EMT [2, 10, 11]. Additionally, many differential expression studies of microRNA (miRNA) have been performed to identify candidate miRNAs that possibly regulate EMT [12]. Specifically, these noncoding miRNAs could selectively bind to mRNAs and subsequently inhibit their translation or facilitate their degradation, thus controlling the expression of EMT master transcription factors [13]. More importantly, F-box proteins have been well studied and have been demonstrated to be associated with tumorigenesis, and some of them are relevant in the regulation of EMT [14, 15].

Stem cells exhibit an unlimited capacity for self-renewal and the potential to differentiate into different cell types, and thus, they can subsequently form tissues and organisms [16]. Three types of stem cells have been identified: embryonic, germinal, and somatic. In recent years, cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are also known as cancer stem-like cells, have been validated to exist in various types of human cancers, although the concept of CSCs remains controversial [17]. Multiple factors such as Notch, Wnt, and Sonic hedgehog have been reported to trigger the process of stem cell differentiation. Recently, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that F-box proteins play an important role in the regulation of CSCs. Therefore, in this review, we will primarily describe emerging F-box proteins that are involved in the regulation of EMT and CSCs in human cancers.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the classification of E3 ubiquitin ligases

Protein degradation is often essential for a rapid response to signal transduction and the recycling of amino acids as part of protein turnover, and a dysregulated pool of proteins may lead to various types of disorders including cancer [18, 19]. Studies have demonstrated that two major proteolytic pathways function in eukaryotes, namely, lysosomal-mediated and proteasome-mediated degradation proteolysis [20, 21]. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) regulates cellular protein homeostasis by governing the process of protein degradation, which is known as ubiquitination, and subsequently controls different cellular processes such as cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, migration, and apoptosis [18, 22, 23]. Some specific molecular signaling pathways would be constantly activated by damaged or unwanted proteins that were not removed in a timely manner, which could cause diseases such as cancer [24].

It is known that UPS-targeted protein degradation involves two well-defined steps: (1) the covalent attachment of multiple ubiquitin molecules to a substrate and (2) the recognition and degradation of a ubiquitin-tagged substrate by the 26S proteasome [25, 26]. The first step occurs by a three-step enzymatic cascade, which is catalyzed by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and the ubiquitin ligase (E3) [14]. Specifically, the ubiquitin molecule is activated by E1 in an ATP-dependent manner and is transferred to E2. Subsequently, E3 promotes the attachment of ubiquitin moieties to the substrate protein, which finally facilitates degradation by the 26S proteasome [27].

It is noteworthy that the substrate specificity of ubiquitination and further degradation is determined by the E3 enzymes [28]. As of now, more than 600 E3 ubiquitin ligases have been discovered in the human genome [29]. E3 ligases are mainly divided into three major types: U-box domain, really interesting new gene (RING) domain, and homologous to E6-associated protein C-terminus (HECT) domain [30]. In addition, the largest family of E3s is the Cullin-RING E3 ligase (CRL) complex family, which contains eight members named CRL1, CRL2, CRL3, CRL4A, CRL4B, CRL5, CRL7, and CRL9 [31, 32]. Of the eight CRLs, CRL1, also designated as the SKP1-cullin 1-F-box protein (SCF) E3 ligase complex, has been well characterized [33]. Structurally, the SCF complex consists of CRL1 as the scaffold protein; the RING finger protein RBX1, which recruits the E2 enzyme; and S-phase kinase-associated protein 1 (SKP1); SKP1 functions as an adaptor protein to bridge F-box proteins as well as variable F-box proteins that confer substrate selectivity by targeting a distinct subset of substrates for ubiquitination [34, 35]. It has been validated that the human genome encodes 69 F-box proteins, and each of them is composed of at least two functional domains: various carboxy-terminal domains that bind specific substrates [35] and the F-box motif, which is considered to be a protein-protein interaction domain that recruits F-box proteins into the SCF complex via direct binding with the adaptor protein SKP1 [36]. Depending on the specific substrate recognition and binding domains, F-box proteins are organized into three subclasses: 10 FBXW proteins (contain WD40 repeat domains), 22 FBXL proteins (contain leucine-rich repeat substrate binding domains), and 37 FBXO proteins (contain other motifs such as kelch repeats or proline-rich motifs to bind substrates) [34, 37]. Therefore, this article will provide a comprehensive summary of the known and emerging F-box proteins that regulate EMT and CSCs and will elucidate how F-box proteins, by targeting their substrates, are involved in EMT and CSC regulation during carcinogenesis.

Regulation of EMT by F-box proteins

Numerous efforts have been made to identify several F-box proteins that are involved in EMT through degradation of their downstream proteins. However, it is worth mentioning that studies on F-box proteins and EMT are still scarce and that data are lacking for most of the 69 F-box proteins. In the following sections, we will describe the specific substrates, functions, and pathological evidence of different F-box proteins that are involved in EMT regulation (Table 1).
Table 1

Substrates, functions, and pathological evidence of F-box proteins involved in EMT during cancer progression

F-box protein

Substrates

Cancer types

Functions

References

β-TrCP

Snail, β-catenin, Twist

Breast cancer, lung cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and cervical cancer

Oncoprotein or tumor suppressor; inhibits EMT, migration, and invasion

[63, 64, 7175]

FBXW7

Snail, MMPs, mTOR, RhoA

Lung cancer, gastric cancer, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma

Tumor suppressor; inhibits EMT, invasion, and metastasis; and increases sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs

[3944, 5052, 136]

SKP2

p27, Twist

Melanoma, breast cancer, osteosarcoma, and prostate cancer

Oncoprotein; promotes cell growth, EMT, and invasion; and increases drug resistance

[84, 86, 87, 139]

FBXL5

Snail1

Gastric cancer and cervical cancer

Tumor suppressor; inhibits EMT and metastasis

[92, 94, 95]

FBXL14

Snail1, Slug, Twist, Sip1

Head and neck cancer

Tumor suppressor; inhibits EMT and metastasis

[97, 98]

FBXO2

None

Gastric cancer

Oncoprotein; promotes proliferation, metastasis, and EMT

[127]

FBXO11

Snail

Breast cancer and gastric cancer

Tumor suppressor; inhibits cell growth, EMT, and metastasis; induces apoptosis

[102104]

FBXO22

Snail

Breast cancer

Tumor suppressor; inhibits EMT and metastasis

[131]

FBXO31

Snail1

Gastric cancer

Tumor suppressor; inhibits cell growth and EMT

[135]

FBXO32

MyoD, CtBP1

Urothelial carcinoma and breast cancer

Induces apoptosis and inhibits EMT in urothelial carcinoma; promotes EMT and metastasis in breast cancer cells

[113, 114]

FBXO45

Snail1, Snail2, Twist1, ZEB1, ZEB2

Prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, cervical cancer, and pancreatic cancer

Tumor suppressor or oncoprotein; inhibits EMT

[122124]

The FBXW family

Two types of FBXW proteins have been found to regulate the EMT process in different types of human cancers, including the well-studied FBXW7 (also known as FBW7 and CDC4) and β-transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP). FBXW7 plays an important tumor-suppressive role in regulating the effects of various oncogenic proteins [37], including cyclin E, c-Myc, c-Jun, Notch, mTOR, and MCL-1 [37, 38]. The transcription factor Snail, a key regulator of EMT, has recently been found to be regulated by FBXW7 [39]. In this study, FBXW7 suppressed cell migration and invasion mainly by promoting ubiquitination and proteolysis of Snail in human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which led to inhibition of E-cadherin expression in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, silencing of FBXW7 induced EMT through the stabilization of Snail protein, which indicates that the FBXW7-Snail axis could be a potential target for anti-NSCLC therapy [39]. Furthermore, another study revealed that FBXW7 inhibited the metastasis and progression of gastric cancer partly via the RhoA signaling pathway, which was accompanied by upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of N-cadherin and vimentin [40]. A mechanistic study demonstrated that FBXW7 induced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of RhoA protein, which led to a blockade of EMT [40].

It was recently reported that FBXW7 is frequently downregulated in cancer cell lines and tumor tissues, such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC), compared with normal tissues and normal cell lines [41]. Functional studies revealed that the increase in FBXW7 levels dramatically impedes the migration and invasiveness of RCC cells through a decrease in MMP expression, which suggests that FBXW7 exhibits notable anticancer properties in RCC via repression of EMT [42, 43]. Additionally, rapamycin, which is an mTOR inhibitor, attenuates the EMT process and stem-like properties that are driven by FBXW7 loss, which indicates the pivotal role of the FBXW7/mTOR axis in EMT regulation in colorectal cancer [44]. An integrated analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) network identified several frequent mutations, including ones in FBXW7, that were associated with EMT features in uterine carcinosarcomas [45]. In line with this, FBXW7 mutations were found in colorectal carcinomas, T-ALL, cholangiocarcinoma, uterine endometrial carcinoma, and bladder carcinoma [46]. Similarly, Sakai et al. reported that combined mutations in FBXW7−/− and KrasG12D induced EMT-like morphology in mucosal tumors in an intestinal cancer model [47]. In fact, mutations in FBXW7 may impair its ability to bind to its substrates; this would lead to upregulation of the active forms of these substrates such as Notch1 [48] and c-Myc [49], which are involved in EMT and cancer progression.

Increasing evidence shows that the FBXW7 protein could overcome EMT-induced resistance to chemotherapy in malignant tumors [50]. For instance, one group recommended that an increase in FBXW7 apparently enhanced cisplatin chemosensitivity in NSCLC cells [51]. Likewise, FBXW7 was also reported to improve the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin and to ablate the invasive capability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells via inhibition of EMT [52]. Interestingly, Ding et al. found that overexpression of miR-223 could reduce the FBXW7 levels, which promoted EMT and doxorubicin resistance in colorectal cancer cells [53]. Moreover, one study indicated that miR-223 was able to induce EMT and decrease sensitivity to doxorubicin through targeting FBXW7 in NSCLC [54]. Furthermore, several investigations have found that FBXW7 is also a downstream target of miR-367 [5557]. Interestingly, the novel long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) cancer susceptibility candidate 2 (CASC2) was reported to inhibit EMT and exert its antimetastatic effects via the miR-367/FBXW7 pathway in HCC cells [58]. Therefore, these findings define a crucial role of the miRNAs/FBXW7 axis in EMT regulation, which may facilitate the development of individualized treatment in clinical practice.

Other FBXW proteins, β-TrCP1 (also named FBXW1) and β-TrCP2 (also named FBXW11), exhibit their oncogenic or tumor-suppressive functions based on the specific cancer type or cellular context [14]. Twenty years ago, IκBα (the NF-κB inhibitor) and β-catenin were identified as two substrates of β-TrCP1 [59, 60]. Since then, other substrates of β-TrCP1 and the highly related β-TrCP2 have been identified [61]. Notably, β-TrCP1 and β-TrCP2 have indistinguishable biochemical functions in terms of recognizing and degrading their substrate proteins [62]. Previous studies have demonstrated that Snail is a labile protein that contains two phosphorylation motifs of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), which are each necessary for protein degradation and subcellular localization [63]. GSK-3β binds and phosphorylates Snail at motif 2 and thereby induces its nuclear export [63]. Subsequent phosphorylation by GSK-3β at motif 1 results in the association of Snail with β-TrCP and thus leads to the ubiquitination and degradation of Snail in the cytoplasm [63]. Furthermore, cross talk among different signaling pathways including Wnt, hedgehog, and FGF induced EMT during carcinogenesis and were found to be controlled by GSK-3β and β-TrCP through degradation of β-catenin and Snail [64, 65]. It is important to note that missense mutations in β-TrCP such as A99V, H342Y, H425Y, C206Y, G260E, and F462S, which could lead to β-catenin stabilization, have been observed in gastric cancer [66, 67]. In addition, mutations in β-TrCP have also been reported in prostate and breast cancers [68, 69].

Notably, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection plays a critical role in the carcinogenesis and development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), as the virus could encode some miRNAs that facilitate tumor progression through targeting virus-infected host genes or self-viral genes [70]. In 2015, Yan et al. demonstrated that EBV-miR-BART10-3p promoted EMT and metastasis in NPC by directly targeting β-TrCP and stabilizing the level of the downstream substrates β-catenin and Snail [71]. In addition, one group revealed that NF-κB abrogated the ubiquitination and degradation of Snail by β-TrCP via the induction of COP9 signalosome 2 (CSN2) [72]. Western blot results also showed that the expression of Snail was related to the activation of NF-κB, while knockdown of Snail suppressed inflammation-mediated invasion and migration of breast cancer cells [72]. YWHAZ, also known as 14-3-3zeta, was identified as a potent EMT promoter in NSCLC. Moreover, the level of ubiquitinated β-catenin is decreased due to its interaction with YWHAZ, which results in detachment of β-catenin from β-TrCP and a subsequent increase in β-catenin stability [73]. Twist has been considered one of the key factors of EMT through its inhibition of E-cadherin expression, which leads to enhanced cell invasion and metastasis [7]. One study identified Twist protein as a ubiquitin substrate of β-TrCP and found that the degradation of Twist could inhibit EMT and metastasis of human cervical cancer [74]. Moreover, Li et al. reported that AKT1 suppressed EMT via induction of β-TrCP-mediated Twist1 degradation in breast cancer cells, which ablated cell migration and invasion [75]. Hence, considering the function of β-TrCP in regulating EMT, targeting β-TrCP could be a new therapeutic treatment for human cancers. In summary, FBXW7 and β-TrCP inhibit the EMT process via degradation of their substrates in human cancer cells.

The FBXL family

The FBXL subfamily contains 22 members, namely, FBXL1 (also known as SKP2) to FBXL22. All the FBXL proteins contain an F-box motif and a C-terminal Leu-rich repeat (LRR) domain. Several FBXL subfamily member proteins have been widely reported to affect carcinogenesis and cancer progression. In the following section, we will describe the roles of FBXL proteins, including SKP2, FBXL5, and FBXL14 (also known as the F-box protein Ppa), in EMT regulation.

A growing body of literature strongly implies that SKP2 is an oncoprotein in human cancers [34]. Actually, SKP2 was first identified as a key cell cycle regulator because it targets multiple cell cycle-related proteins such as p27 [76, 77] and p21 [78, 79]. Several studies have confirmed that p27 is a primary target substrate of SKP2 [80, 81] and that its expression is inversely related to SKP2 expression in human cancers [82]. Furthermore, SKP2 plays important roles in cancer metastasis via decreasing the expression of p27 [78]. It has also been documented that TGF-β1 induces EMT [83]. Interestingly, one study revealed that the level of SKP2 was elevated by TGF-β1 treatment in human melanoma, which was accompanied by increased phosphorylation of Akt1 and accumulation of c-Myc during EMT [84]. One group showed that miR-200b/c induced the upregulation of SKP2 and the degradation of p27 via targeting the reversion-triggering cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK), which promoted tumorigenesis and progression in colorectal cancer [85].

Paclitaxel is an important drug used as a pivotal chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of breast cancer. However, patients with breast cancer often develop drug resistance, which leads to poor treatment outcomes. One group reported that EMT was correlated with high expression of SKP2 and that knockdown of SKP2 caused partial reversal of the EMT phenotype in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer cells [86]. Methotrexate (MTX)-resistant osteosarcoma, in which EMT is involved, remains a major clinical challenge and usually affects adolescents and young adults [87]. EMT properties and resistance to MTX in OS cells are acquired via SKP2 overexpression [87]. Thus, the pharmacological suppression of SKP2 may prove to be a potent chemotherapeutic strategy to overcome drug resistance due to EMT reversal in various human cancers. Several Skp2 inhibitors, such as Compound A and SZL-P1-41, have been discovered to block Skp2 E3 ligase activity [88, 89].

FBXL5 was found to regulate the turnover of p150, which acts as an activator of the microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein; this protein is important for vesicular transport and mitotic spindle organization [90]. However, the role of FBXL5 in tumorigenesis has not been fully elucidated. It has been reported that FBXL5 could modulate Snail1 binding to DNA and its stability [91]. Moreover, Snail1 was validated as a substrate of FBXL5, and the degradation of Snail1 leads to the negative regulation of EMT, which inhibits the metastasis of gastric cancer cells [91, 92]. The protein iASPP, encoded by the PPP1R13L gene, is overexpressed in human cancers and increases the expression of miR-20a in a p53-dependent manner [93]. Furthermore, Xiong et al. reported that the iASPP-induced upregulation of miR-20a promoted the EMT process and led to cisplatin resistance partially through targeting FBXL5 in cervical cancer cells [94]. In contrast, one group observed that the silencing of FBXL5 was sufficient to upregulate E-cadherin at the plasma membrane, which is the basic structure of cell-cell adhesion [95]. Therefore, the functions of FBXL5 in the regulation of EMT should be further investigated in human cancers.

FBXL14, also known as the F-box protein Partner of paired (Ppa), is dynamically expressed in neural crest-forming regions [96]. Importantly, the expression of FBXL14 is abrogated in tumor tissues [96]. Additionally, it has been shown that the FBXL14 protein mediates proteasome degradation of core EMT factors, including Snail1, Twist, Sip1, and Slug [97]. Consistently, one group revealed that imipramine blue inhibited head and neck cancer cell invasiveness by enhancing FBXL14-triggered Twist degradation, which indicates that FBXL14 could function as an EMT inhibitor to suppress metastasis in human cancers [98]. Undoubtedly, further investigations are required to determine the physiological role and mechanisms of FBXL proteins in EMT regulation in various types of human cancers. In summary, SKP2 enhances EMT in breast cancer and melanoma, whereas FBXL5 suppresses EMT in human gastric and cervical cancer cells, and FBXL14 is an EMT inhibitor in head and neck cancer cells.

The FBXO family

Except the FBXW and FBXL families, the remaining 37 F-box proteins are designated as FBXO proteins, which comprise the largest subclass of the 69 putative F-box proteins. Unlike FBXW proteins with the WD40 motif and FBXL proteins with the LRR motif, FBXO proteins contain the F-box motif in the N-terminus and different functional domains in the C-terminus, which have not been fully characterized. In this section, we will limit our discussion to several members of the FBXO family, which function in modulating EMT, including FBXO2, FBXO11, FBXO22, FBXO31, FBXO32, and FBXO45.

It has been reported that FBXO11 targets the BCL-6 oncogenic protein for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of human B cell lymphomas [99]. Biologically, the overexpression of FBXO11 inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis by facilitating BCL-6 degradation in diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells [99]. In addition, FBXO11 mutations were observed in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphomas, and pancreatic cancer [99101]. It has been previously demonstrated that FBXO11 is a ubiquitin ligase that promotes ubiquitin-induced degradation of Snail through targeting the SNAG domain of Snail1, which suppresses the progression of EMT in breast cancer cells [102]. Another study using an animal model showed that deactivation of FBXO11 in mice resulted in neonatal lethality, epidermal thickening, and upregulation of Snail in the epidermis, which suggests that FBXO11 is a physiological ubiquitin ligase of Snail [102]. Likewise, Zheng et al. revealed that SCF-FBXO11 attenuated the EMT process and cancer metastasis by promoting the degradation of Snail in a PKD1 phosphorylation-dependent manner; this is considered posttranslational regulation of EMT [103]. Nevertheless, the expression of FBXO11 was found to be upregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with tumor-adjacent tissues, while a clinical analysis based on the TCGA database indicated that the elevation in FBXO11 level was closely related to large tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and advanced TNM stage [104]. Mechanistically, the EMT process is dramatically stimulated by FBXO11 through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which leads to the promotion of gastric cancer cell proliferation and metastasis [104].

FBXO32, which is also known as a muscle-specific F-box protein, is expressed largely in skeletal muscle cells and cardiomyocytes [105, 106]. It has been documented that FBXO32 plays a crucial role in regulating muscle homeostasis by targeting multiple substrates such as calcineurin [107], eIF-3 [108], MyoD [109], MAPK-1 [110], and IκBα [111]. Emerging evidence has identified FBXO32 as a tumor suppressor because it induces apoptosis [112]. In support of this evidence, FBXO32 dysregulation promotes the EMT process in urothelial carcinoma after acquisition of platinum resistance. This was verified by accumulation of MyoD proteins and the subsequent increase in the expression of the mesenchymal markers Snail and vimentin and the reduction in the expression of the epithelial molecule E-cadherin [113]. However, interestingly, Sahu et al. reported conversely that FBXO32 directly targeted CtBP1 for its ubiquitination and enhanced its nuclear retention, which generated a suitable microenvironment for EMT progression and cancer metastasis in human breast cancer cells [114]. Moreover, in the same study, the expression of FBXO32 was elevated in breast cancer cells with invasive properties (MDA-MB-231 cells), and depletion of FBXO32 in a xenograft mouse model suppressed tumor growth and metastasis [114].

FBXO5, which is also known as EMI1 and FBX5, has been identified as an endogenous inhibitor of the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C) that plays an oncogenic role in human cancers. It has been reported that upregulation of FBXO5 is correlated with increased growth and instability of p53-deficient cells, which suggests that depletion of p53 may have a crucial function in tumorigenesis together with FBXO5 [115]. Previous studies have shown that FBXO45 is an atypical F-box protein induced by estrogens [116]. Further studies have revealed that the FBXO45 protein is responsible for neural development via the ubiquitin-protein ligase E3 [117] and that it plays a pivotal role in controlling synapse formation [118], terminal synaptic growth [119], neurotransmitter release [120], and neural differentiation [118] via ubiquitin-induced proteolysis. In addition, FBXO45 was found to induce the degradation of p73, which belongs to the p53 tumor suppressor family [121]. Furthermore, knockdown of FBXO45 enhances the stability of p73 and promotes cell apoptosis, which indicates that FBXO45 might have an oncogenic function in carcinogenesis [121].

A recent study based on data collected from the TCGA and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases showed that the expression of FBXO45 and FBXO5 was apparently increased in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC) compared with normal lung tissues [122]. Similarly, a prognostic analysis conducted by the K-M plotter database also revealed that overexpression of FBXO45 and FBXO5 contributed to shorter overall survival in patients with SqCLC [122]. Further molecular experiments showed that knockdown of FBXO5 increased cell apoptosis but that knockdown of FBXO45 promoted EMT in SqCLC cells [122]. However, FBXO45 does not form an SCF complex because it associates with the RING finger-type ubiquitin ligase PAM (protein associated with Myc) to produce a novel SKP1-PAM-FBXO45 complex without Cullin1 [118]. Moreover, the SKP1-PAM-FBXO45 complex interacts with Snail1/2, Twist1, and ZEB1/2 through the SPRY domain and F-box domain of FBXO45, which promotes ubiquitination-based degradation of these core EMT transcription factors [123]. Conversely, the level of FBXO45 is negatively regulated by miR-27a, which leads to the inhibition of degradation of these EMT factors by FBXO45 and to EMT progression [123]. FLASH, a caspase-8-associated protein 2 (also known as CASP8AP2), was found to prevent ZEB1 degradation mediated by SIAH1/2 E3 ligases and the SKP1-PAM-FBXO45 atypical ubiquitin E3 ligase complex, thereby leading to an upsurge of EMT [124]. Further mechanistic studies are required to define the physiological role of FBXO45 in carcinogenesis and EMT progression.

Most recently, several studies focused on the role of the FBXO2, FBXO22, and FBXO31 proteins in EMT regulation. FBXO2 is an SCF ubiquitin ligase substrate adaptor that preferentially and specifically binds to high-mannose glycoproteins, and it is highly enriched in the brain [125, 126]. Xu et al. revealed that knockdown of FBXO2 by siRNA reduced the proliferation and metastasis of human gastric cancer cells and inhibited EMT, as evidenced by the upregulation of E-cadherin and the downregulation of N-cadherin and vimentin [127]. Thus, targeting FBXO2 may be a potent therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer patients with higher expression of FBXO2. FBXO22 is a novel, well-characterized F-box protein that mediates the degradation of Lysine (K)-specific demethylase 4A (KDM4A), Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) and methylated p53 [128130], although the biological role of FBXO22 is still largely undefined. One group demonstrated that FBXO22 exhibited antitumor effects by targeting Snail for ubiquitin-triggered proteasomal degradation, which suppressed the progression of EMT and metastasis in breast cancer [131]. Specifically, a patient-derived W52R mutation within the F-box domain impaired FBXO22-mediated Snail degradation [131]. Previous studies have indicated that FBXO31 is a senescence-related protein, as it targets and degrades Cyclin D1, which plays an important role in G1/S entry [132, 133]. Furthermore, FBXO31 has been defined as a tumor suppressor in various human malignancies such as breast, ovarian, hepatocellular, and prostate cancers, since it targets Cdt1 for degradation in G2 phase of the cell cycle to prevent replication and carcinogenesis [132, 134]. Similarly, further evidence has shown that FBXO31 represses EMT by mediating the ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation of Snail1 in gastric cancer [135]. Since studies that focus on how these FBXO proteins regulate EMT during cancer progression are extremely rare, more studies should be performed to discover novel FBXO proteins that are involved in EMT modulation and to elucidate the molecular mechanism of FBXO-triggered EMT. In summary, FBXO2 promotes EMT, while FBXO11, FBXO45, FBXO22, and FBXO31 inhibit EMT in human cancer cells. Moreover, the role of FBXO32 in EMT regulation is dependent on the cancer type.

Regulation of cancer stem cells by F-box proteins

Emerging evidence has revealed the critical role of F-box proteins in cancer stem cells. For example, two groups reported that depletion of FBXW7 significantly promotes EMT and the generation of CSCs in colorectal cancer [44] and cholangiocarcinoma cells [136]. Notably, FBXW7 deletion results in stem cell activation and leukemogenesis via upregulation of the Notch target c-Myc [137]. FBXW7 targets Notch activity and thus is also characterized as an essential negative regulator in breast cancer stem cell expansion. Prolyl-isomerase Pin1 sustains Notch signaling by opposing the FBXW7 effects on Notch degradation and promotes breast cancer stem cell self-renewal, tumor growth, and metastasis [138].

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is one of the most common malignant diseases in males due to a lack of effective targeted therapy. Ruan et al. showed that SKP2 stabilized the Twist protein and prevented its ubiquitination and degradation by β-TrCP, which promoted EMT and CSCs, thereby playing a fundamental role in the formation and progression of CRPC [139]. Skp2 positively regulates cancer stem cell populations and CSC self-renewal ability in human cancers, which suggests that targeting Skp2 could restrict cancer stem cells and cancer progression [88]. It has also been reported that Skp2 governs basal homeostasis and stress-induced hematopoietic stem cell regeneration [140, 141]. Similarly, Skp2 is a key regulator of hematopoietic stem cell quiescence, frequency, and self-renewal capability. Depletion of Skp2 enhances hematopoietic stem cell populations via stimulation of cell cycle entry. Notably, depletion of Skp2 enhances sensitivity of leukemia cells to chemotherapy agents, which indicates that Skp2 might be a target for leukemia stem cell treatment [142]. In addition, Skp2 overexpression, which was found to be associated with poor prognosis, maintains the cancer stem cell pool and increases CSC self-renewal ability in nasopharyngeal cancer [143]. NDRG1 (N-myc downstream regulated gene 1) promotes stem-like properties via direct interaction with Skp2 and downregulation of Skp2 phosphorylation in nonsmall cell lung cancer [144].

β-TrCP was also reported to regulate cancer stem cells in various types of human cancers. For example, increased β-TrCP activity targets the REST transcriptional repressor, which leads to the inhibition of cancer stem cell proliferation [145]. SOX9 represses β-TrCP-mediated protein degradation and increases the nuclear GLI1 level and thus promotes cancer stem cell properties [146]. FBXL14 overexpression induces the degradation of c-Myc, promotes glioma stem cell differentiation, and represses tumor growth. In line with this, the deubiquitinase USP13 is highly expressed in glioma stem cells, where it stabilizes c-Myc by antagonizing FBXL14-mediated ubiquitination; this in turn enhances stem cell self-renewal and tumor growth [147]. Ueda et al. reported that Fbxl10 overexpression in murine hematopoietic stem cells contributed to leukemia via upregulation of Nsg2 (neuron-specific gene family member 2) and metabolic activation [148]. FBXL7 and FBXW11 are also involved in UCHL1 (ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1)-mediated stem-like cancer cell function in high-grade glioma [149].

Conclusions and perspectives

The EMT process plays a crucial role during development, while inappropriate activation of EMT significantly contributes to tumor progression and metastasis. This process is primarily regulated by multiple EMT-related factors including E-cadherin, β-catenin, Snail, Slug, Twist, and ZEB, whose levels and stability could be directly driven by different F-box proteins through targeting and mediating the ubiquitination-based degradation of these EMT factors (Fig. 1). EMT is associated with cancer stem cells and drug resistance. Therefore, in this review, we introduced multiple F-box proteins and discussed their physiological or pathological functions in controlling EMT progression and cancer stem cells. However, many open questions remain and need to be addressed in the future. For example, among the 69 F-box proteins, how many other F-box proteins are involved in EMT and cancer stem cells in human cancers? The detailed molecular mechanisms of how F-box proteins govern the EMT process and cancer stem cells need to be elucidated. Moreover, transgenic mouse models should be used to validate the role of F-box proteins in regulating EMT and cancer stem cells. In addition, it is necessary to determine whether F-box protein expression is associated with EMT and cancer stem cell marker changes in clinical tumor tissues. We believe that these future studies will lead to novel therapeutic strategies that involve targeting F-box proteins in human cancers.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Illustration of how F-box proteins govern EMT-inducing transcription factors. F-box proteins regulate EMT through proteolysis of EMT-inducing factors. FBXL, F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein; FBXW, F-box and WD-40 domain protein; FBXO, F-box only protein

Abbreviations

APC/C: 

Anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome

CASC2: 

Cancer susceptibility candidate 2

CRL: 

Cullin-RING E3 ligase

CRPC: 

Castration-resistant prostate cancer

CSCs: 

Cancer stem cells

EMT: 

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

GEO: 

Gene Expression Omnibus

GSK-3β: 

Glycogen synthase kinase-3β

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HECT: 

Homologous to E6-associated protein C-terminus

KDM4A: 

Lysine (K)-specific demethylase 4A

KLF4: 

Kruppel-like factor 4

lncRNA: 

Long noncoding RNA

LRR: 

Leu-rich repeat

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

MROC: 

Methotrexate-resistant osteosarcoma cancer

NDRG1: 

N-myc downstream regulated gene 1

NF-κB: 

Nuclear factor-κB

NSCLC: 

Nonsmall cell lung cancer

RCC: 

Renal cell carcinoma

RING: 

Really interesting new gene

SCF: 

SKP1-cullin 1-F-box protein

SKP1: 

S-phase kinase-associated protein 1

TCGA: 

The Cancer Genome Atlas

TGF-β: 

Transforming growth factor-β

UCHL1: 

Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1

UPS: 

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

ZEB: 

Zinc-finger E-box-binding

β-TrCP: 

β-Transducin repeat-containing protein

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC number 81572936 and 81773186).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

YS searched the literature regarding F-box protein and EMT. ML and YL searched the literature regarding F-box proteins and stem cells and made the figure and table. YS, ML, YL, ZW, and XZ wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 109 Xueyuan Xi Road, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China
(2)
Center of Scientific Research, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, Zhejiang, China
(3)
Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

References

  1. Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139:871–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gonzalez DM, Medici D. Signaling mechanisms of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Science Signaling. 2014;7:re8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Thiery JP, Sleeman JP. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:131–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Baulida J, Garcia de Herreros A. Snail1-driven plasticity of epithelial and mesenchymal cells sustains cancer malignancy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1856;2015:55–61.Google Scholar
  5. Barkeer S, Chugh S, Batra SK, et al. Glycosylation of cancer stem cells: function in stemness, tumorigenesis, and metastasis. Neoplasia. 2018;20:813–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Peinado H, Portillo F, Cano A. Transcriptional regulation of cadherins during development and carcinogenesis. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2004;48:365–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang J, Mani SA, Donaher JL, et al. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell. 2004;117:927–39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Peinado H, Olmeda D, Cano A. Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:415–28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Katsuno Y, Lamouille S, Derynck R. TGF-beta signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer progression. Curr Opin Oncol. 2013;25:76–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–96.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. De Craene B, Berx G. Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:97–110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Y, Tang H. MicroRNAs regulate the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer progression. MicroRNA. 2014;3:108–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lamouille S, Subramanyam D, Blelloch R, et al. Regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal and mesenchymal-epithelial transitions by microRNAs. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25:200–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang Z, Liu P, Inuzuka H, et al. Roles of F-box proteins in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:233–47.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaz VM, de Herreros AG. F-box proteins: keeping the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in check. Semin Cancer Biol. 2016;36:71–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, et al. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414:105–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Clevers H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med. 2011;17:313–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Christianson JC, Ye Y. Cleaning up in the endoplasmic reticulum: ubiquitin in charge. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21:325–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. MacGurn JA, Hsu PC, Emr SD. Ubiquitin and membrane protein turnover: from cradle to grave. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:231–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ciechanover A. Intracellular protein degradation: from a vague idea through the lysosome and the ubiquitin-proteasome system and onto human diseases and drug targeting. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:3400–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Eldridge AG, O’Brien T. Therapeutic strategies within the ubiquitin proteasome system. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:4–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Varshavsky A. The ubiquitin system, an immense realm. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:167–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Mosesson Y, Mills GB, Yarden Y. Derailed endocytosis: an emerging feature of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:835–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nalepa G, Rolfe M, Harper JW. Drug discovery in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:596–613.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ravid T, Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:679–90.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bedford L, Lowe J, Dick LR, et al. Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation and the ubiquitin-proteasome system as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:29–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagy V, Dikic I. Ubiquitin ligase complexes: from substrate selectivity to conjugational specificity. Biol Chem. 2010;391:163–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Li W, Bengtson MH, Ulbrich A, et al. Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle’s dynamics and signaling. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1487.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lipkowitz S, Weissman AM. RINGs of good and evil: RING finger ubiquitin ligases at the crossroads of tumour suppression and oncogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:629–43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:399–434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ. Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:9–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Skaar JR, Pagan JK, Pagano M. Mechanisms and function of substrate recruitment by F-box proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:369–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Frescas D, Pagano M. Deregulated proteolysis by the F-box proteins SKP2 and beta-TrCP: tipping the scales of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:438–49.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bai C, Sen P, Hofmann K, et al. SKP1 connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box. Cell. 1996;86:263–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:369–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Welcker M, Clurman BE. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:83–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cheng Y, Li G. Role of the ubiquitin ligase Fbw7 in cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31:75–87.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Y, Zhang X, Ye M, et al. FBW7 loss promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer through the stabilization of Snail protein. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:75–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Li H, Wang Z, Zhang W, et al. Fbxw7 regulates tumor apoptosis, growth arrest and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in part through the RhoA signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;370:39–55.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Shimizu K, Nihira NT, Inuzuka H, et al. Physiological functions of FBW7 in cancer and metabolism. Cell Signal. 2018;46:15–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. He H, Dai J, Xu Z, et al. Fbxw7 regulates renal cell carcinoma migration and invasion via suppression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:3694–702.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Cai Y, Zhang M, Qiu X, et al. Upregulation of FBXW7 suppresses renal cancer metastasis and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Dis Markers. 2017;2017:8276939.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Liu Y, Lu J, et al. Rapamycin inhibits FBXW7 loss-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like characteristics in colorectal cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434:352–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Cherniack AD, Shen H, Walter V, et al. Integrated molecular characterization of uterine carcinosarcoma. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:411–23.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Davis RJ, Welcker M, Clurman BE. Tumor suppression by the Fbw7 ubiquitin ligase: mechanisms and opportunities. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:455–64.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Sakai E, Nakayama M, Oshima H, et al. Combined mutation of Apc, Kras, and Tgfbr2 effectively drives metastasis of intestinal cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78:1334–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. O'Neil J, Grim J, Strack P, et al. FBW7 mutations in leukemic cells mediate NOTCH pathway activation and resistance to gamma-secretase inhibitors. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1813–24.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. King B, Trimarchi T, Reavie L, et al. The ubiquitin ligase FBXW7 modulates leukemia-initiating cell activity by regulating MYC stability. Cell. 2013;153:1552–66.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Cao J, Ge MH, Ling ZQ. Fbxw7 tumor suppressor: a vital regulator contributes to human tumorigenesis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2496.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Yu HG, Wei W, Xia LH, et al. FBW7 upregulation enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013;14:6321–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yu J, Zhang W, Gao F, et al. FBW7 increases chemosensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through suppression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2014;13:184–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ding J, Zhao Z, Song J, et al. MiR-223 promotes the doxorubicin resistance of colorectal cancer cells via regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting FBXW7. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2018;50:597–604.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Li R, Wu S, Chen X, et al. miR-223/FBW7 axis regulates doxorubicin sensitivity through epithelial mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8:2512–24.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Xiao G, Zhang B, Meng J, et al. miR-367 stimulates Wnt cascade activation through degrading FBXW7 in NSCLC stem cells. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:2374–85.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Xiao G, Gao X, Sun X, et al. miR-367 promotes tumor growth by inhibiting FBXW7 in NSCLC. Oncol Rep. 2017;38:1190–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu J, Wu W, Wang J, et al. miR-367 promotes the proliferation and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer via targeting FBXW7. Oncol Rep. 2017;37:1052–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang Y, Liu Z, Yao B, et al. Long non-coding RNA CASC2 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through CASC2/miR-367/FBXW7 axis. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:123.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Yaron A, Hatzubai A, Davis M, et al. Identification of the receptor component of the IkappaBalpha-ubiquitin ligase. Nature. 1998;396:590–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Hart M, Concordet JP, Lassot I, et al. The F-box protein beta-TrCP associates with phosphorylated beta-catenin and regulates its activity in the cell. Current biology : CB. 1999;9:207–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Skaar JR, D'Angiolella V, Pagan JK, et al. SnapShot: F box proteins II. Cell. 2009;137:1358 1358 e1351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Fuchs SY, Spiegelman VS, Kumar KG. The many faces of beta-TrCP E3 ubiquitin ligases: reflections in the magic mirror of cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:2028–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou BP, Deng J, Xia W, et al. Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3beta-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:931–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou BP, Hung MC. Wnt, hedgehog and snail: sister pathways that control by GSK-3beta and beta-Trcp in the regulation of metastasis. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:772–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Katoh M, Katoh M. Cross-talk of WNT and FGF signaling pathways at GSK3beta to regulate beta-catenin and SNAIL signaling cascades. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2006;5:1059–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Kim CJ, Song JH, Cho YG, et al. Somatic mutations of the beta-TrCP gene in gastric cancer. Apmis. 2007;115:127–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Saitoh T, Katoh M. Expression profiles of betaTRCP1 and betaTRCP2, and mutation analysis of betaTRCP2 in gastric cancer. Int J Oncol. 2001;18:959–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Gerstein AV, Almeida TA, Zhao G, et al. APC/CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) pathway alterations in human prostate cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002;34:9–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S, et al. The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2007;318:1108–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pagano JS. The Epstein-Barr virus and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;74:2397–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Yan Q, Zeng Z, Gong Z, et al. EBV-miR-BART10-3p facilitates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by targeting BTRC. Oncotarget. 2015;6:41766–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Wu Y, Deng J, Rychahou PG, et al. Stabilization of snail by NF-kappaB is required for inflammation-induced cell migration and invasion. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:416–28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Chen CH, Chuang SM, Yang MF, et al. A novel function of YWHAZ/beta-catenin axis in promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lung cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012;10:1319–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhong J, Ogura K, Wang Z, et al. Degradation of the transcription factor Twist, an oncoprotein that promotes cancer metastasis. Discov Med. 2013;15:7–15.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Li CW, Xia W, Lim SO, et al. AKT1 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer through phosphorylation-dependent Twist1 degradation. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1451–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Carrano AC, Eytan E, Hershko A, et al. SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:193–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Tsvetkov LM, Yeh KH, Lee SJ, et al. p27(Kip1) ubiquitination and degradation is regulated by the SCF(Skp2) complex through phosphorylated Thr187 in p27. Curr. Biol. 1999;9:661–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Yu ZK, Gervais JL, Zhang H. Human CUL-1 associates with the SKP1/SKP2 complex and regulates p21(CIP1/WAF1) and cyclin D proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11324–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Bornstein G, Bloom J, Sitry-Shevah D, et al. Role of the SCFSkp2 ubiquitin ligase in the degradation of p21Cip1 in S phase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:25752–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Nakayama KI, Hatakeyama S, Nakayama K. Regulation of the cell cycle at the G1-S transition by proteolysis of cyclin E and p27Kip1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;282:853–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Suzuki S, Fukasawa H, Misaki T, et al. The amelioration of renal damage in Skp2-deficient mice canceled by p27 Kip1 deficiency in Skp2−/− p27−/− mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36249.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Kitagawa K, Kotake Y, Kitagawa M. Ubiquitin-mediated control of oncogene and tumor suppressor gene products. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1374–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Larue L, Bellacosa A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in development and cancer: role of phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase/AKT pathways. Oncogene. 2005;24:7443–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Qu X, Shen L, Zheng Y, et al. A signal transduction pathway from TGF-beta1 to SKP2 via Akt1 and c-Myc and its correlation with progression in human melanoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014;134:159–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Pan Y, Liang H, Chen W, et al. microRNA-200b and microRNA-200c promote colorectal cancer cell proliferation via targeting the reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs. RNA Biol. 2015;12:276–89.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Yang Q, Huang J, Wu Q, et al. Acquisition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is associated with Skp2 expression in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:1958–67.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Ding L, Wang C, Cui Y, et al. S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 is involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in methotrexate-resistant osteosarcoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2018;52:1841–52.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Chan CH, Morrow JK, Li CF, et al. Pharmacological inactivation of Skp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase restricts cancer stem cell traits and cancer progression. Cell. 2013;154:556–68.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Chen Q, Xie W, Kuhn DJ, et al. Targeting the p27 E3 ligase SCF(Skp2) results in p27- and Skp2-mediated cell-cycle arrest and activation of autophagy. Blood. 2008;111:4690–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang N, Liu J, Ding X, et al. FBXL5 interacts with p150Glued and regulates its ubiquitination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;359:34–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Vinas-Castells R, Frias A, Robles-Lanuza E, et al. Nuclear ubiquitination by FBXL5 modulates Snail1 DNA binding and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:1079–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Wu W, Ding H, Cao J, et al. FBXL5 inhibits metastasis of gastric cancer through suppressing Snail1. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015;35:1764–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Dong P, Ihira K, Hamada J, et al. Reactivating p53 functions by suppressing its novel inhibitor iASPP: a potential therapeutic opportunity in p53 wild-type tumors. Oncotarget. 2015;6:19968–75.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Xiong Y, Sun F, Dong P, et al. iASPP induces EMT and cisplatin resistance in human cervical cancer through miR-20a-FBXL5/BTG3 signaling. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;36:48.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Dragoi AM, Swiss R, Gao B, et al. Novel strategies to enforce an epithelial phenotype in mesenchymal cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3659–72.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Vinas-Castells R, Beltran M, Valls G, et al. The hypoxia-controlled FBXL14 ubiquitin ligase targets SNAIL1 for proteasome degradation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:3794–805.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Lander R, Nordin K, LaBonne C. The F-box protein Ppa is a common regulator of core EMT factors Twist, Snail, Slug, and Sip1. J Cell Biol. 2011;194:17–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Yang WH, Su YH, Hsu WH, et al. Imipramine blue halts head and neck cancer invasion through promoting F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 14-mediated Twist1 degradation. Oncogene. 2016;35:2287–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Duan S, Cermak L, Pagan JK, et al. FBXO11 targets BCL6 for degradation and is inactivated in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Nature. 2012;481:90–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Parry M, Rose-Zerilli MJ, Gibson J, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies novel recurrently mutated genes in patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83244.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Mann KM, Ward JM, Yew CC, et al. Sleeping Beauty mutagenesis reveals cooperating mutations and pathways in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5934–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Jin Y, Shenoy AK, Doernberg S, et al. FBXO11 promotes ubiquitination of the Snail family of transcription factors in cancer progression and epidermal development. Cancer Lett. 2015;362:70–82.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Zheng H, Shen M, Zha YL, et al. PKD1 phosphorylation-dependent degradation of SNAIL by SCF-FBXO11 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:358–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Sun C, Tao Y, Gao Y, et al. F-box protein 11 promotes the growth and metastasis of gastric cancer via PI3K/AKT pathway-mediated EMT. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:416–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Bodine SC, Latres E, Baumhueter S, et al. Identification of ubiquitin ligases required for skeletal muscle atrophy. Science. 2001;294:1704–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Gomes MD, Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, et al. Atrogin-1, a muscle-specific F-box protein highly expressed during muscle atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:14440–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Li HH, Kedar V, Zhang C, et al. Atrogin-1/muscle atrophy F-box inhibits calcineurin-dependent cardiac hypertrophy by participating in an SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1058–71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Csibi A, Leibovitch MP, Cornille K, et al. MAFbx/Atrogin-1 controls the activity of the initiation factor eIF3-f in skeletal muscle atrophy by targeting multiple C-terminal lysines. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:4413–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Tintignac LA, Lagirand J, Batonnet S, et al. Degradation of MyoD mediated by the SCF (MAFbx) ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:2847–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Xie P, Guo S, Fan Y, et al. Atrogin-1/MAFbx enhances simulated ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis in cardiomyocytes through degradation of MAPK phosphatase-1 and sustained JNK activation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:5488–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Usui S, Maejima Y, Pain J, et al. Endogenous muscle atrophy F-box mediates pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy through regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB. Circ Res. 2011;109:161–71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Tan J, Yang X, Zhuang L, et al. Pharmacologic disruption of Polycomb-repressive complex 2-mediated gene repression selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1050–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Tanaka N, Kosaka T, Miyazaki Y, et al. Acquired platinum resistance involves epithelial to mesenchymal transition through ubiquitin ligase FBXO32 dysregulation. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e83654.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Sahu SK, Tiwari N, Pataskar A, et al. FBXO32 promotes microenvironment underlying epithelial-mesenchymal transition via CtBP1 during tumour metastasis and brain development. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1523.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Lehman NL, Verschuren EW, Hsu JY, et al. Overexpression of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome inhibitor Emi1 leads to tetraploidy and genomic instability of p53-deficient cells. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1569–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Yoshida K. Characterization of estrogen-induced F-box protein FBXO45. Oncol Rep. 2005;14:531–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Saiga T, Fukuda T, Matsumoto M, et al. Fbxo45 forms a novel ubiquitin ligase complex and is required for neuronal development. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3529–43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Liao EH, Hung W, Abrams B, et al. An SCF-like ubiquitin ligase complex that controls presynaptic differentiation. Nature. 2004;430:345–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Wu C, Daniels RW, DiAntonio A. DFsn collaborates with Highwire to down-regulate the Wallenda/DLK kinase and restrain synaptic terminal growth. Neural Dev. 2007;2:16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Tada H, Okano HJ, Takagi H, et al. Fbxo45, a novel ubiquitin ligase, regulates synaptic activity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:3840–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Peschiaroli A, Scialpi F, Bernassola F, et al. The F-box protein FBXO45 promotes the proteasome-dependent degradation of p73. Oncogene. 2009;28:3157–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Wang K, Qu X, Liu S, et al. Identification of aberrantly expressed F-box proteins in squamous-cell lung carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:1509–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Xu M, Zhu C, Zhao X, et al. Atypical ubiquitin E3 ligase complex Skp1-Pam-Fbxo45 controls the core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-inducing transcription factors. Oncotarget. 2015;6:979–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Abshire CF, Carroll JL, Dragoi AM. FLASH protects ZEB1 from degradation and supports cancer cells' epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Oncogenesis. 2016;5:e254.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Yoshida Y, Tokunaga F, Chiba T, et al. Fbs2 is a new member of the E3 ubiquitin ligase family that recognizes sugar chains. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:43877–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Erhardt JA, Hynicka W, DiBenedetto A, et al. A novel F box protein, NFB42, is highly enriched in neurons and induces growth arrest. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:35222–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Sun X, Wang T, Guan ZR, et al. FBXO2, a novel marker for metastasis in human gastric cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495:2158–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Tan MK, Lim HJ, Harper JW. SCF(FBXO22) regulates histone H3 lysine 9 and 36 methylation levels by targeting histone demethylase KDM4A for ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:3687–99.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Tian X, Dai S, Sun J, et al. F-box protein FBXO22 mediates polyubiquitination and degradation of KLF4 to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Oncotarget. 2015;6:22767–75.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  130. Johmura Y, Sun J, Kitagawa K, et al. SCF(Fbxo22)-KDM4A targets methylated p53 for degradation and regulates senescence. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10574.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Sun R, Xie HY, Qian JX, et al. FBXO22 possesses both pro-tumorigenic and anti-metastatic roles in breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2018;78:5274–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Kumar R, Neilsen PM, Crawford J, et al. FBXO31 is the chromosome 16q24.3 senescence gene, a candidate breast tumor suppressor, and a component of an SCF complex. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11304–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Santra MK, Wajapeyee N, Green MR. F-box protein FBXO31 mediates cyclin D1 degradation to induce G1 arrest after DNA damage. Nature. 2009;459:722–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Johansson P, Jeffery J, Al-Ejeh F, et al. SCF-FBXO31 E3 ligase targets DNA replication factor Cdt1 for proteolysis in the G2 phase of cell cycle to prevent re-replication. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:18514–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Zou S, Ma C, Yang F, et al. FBXO31 suppresses gastric cancer EMT by targeting Snail1 for proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018;16:286–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Yang H, Lu X, Liu Z, et al. FBXW7 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stemness and metastatic potential of cholangiocarcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:6310–25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  137. Matsuoka S, Oike Y, Onoyama I, et al. Fbxw7 acts as a critical fail-safe against premature loss of hematopoietic stem cells and development of T-ALL. Genes Dev. 2008;22:986–91.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Rustighi A, Zannini A, Tiberi L, et al. Prolyl-isomerase Pin1 controls normal and cancer stem cells of the breast. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6:99–119.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Ruan D, He J, Li CF, et al. Skp2 deficiency restricts the progression and stem cell features of castration-resistant prostate cancer by destabilizing Twist. Oncogene. 2017;36:4299–310.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Rodriguez S, Wang L, Mumaw C, et al. The SKP2 E3 ligase regulates basal homeostasis and stress-induced regeneration of HSCs. Blood. 2011;117:6509–19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Wang J, Han F, Lee SW, et al. E3-ligase Skp2 regulates beta-catenin expression and maintains hematopoietic stem cell homing. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;445:566–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Wang J, Han F, Wu J, et al. The role of Skp2 in hematopoietic stem cell quiescence, pool size, and self-renewal. Blood. 2011;118:5429–38.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Wang J, Huang Y, Guan Z, et al. E3-ligase Skp2 predicts poor prognosis and maintains cancer stem cell pool in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:5591–601.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  144. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Tao F, et al. N-myc downstream regulated gene 1(NDRG1) promotes the stem-like properties of lung cancer cells through stabilized c-Myc. Cancer Lett. 2017;401:53–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Zhang P, Lathia JD, Flavahan WA, et al. Squelching glioblastoma stem cells by targeting REST for proteasomal degradation. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32:559–65.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Deng W, Vanderbilt DB, Lin CC, et al. SOX9 inhibits beta-TrCP-mediated protein degradation to promote nuclear GLI1 expression and cancer stem cell properties. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:1123–38.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Fang X, Zhou W, Wu Q, et al. Deubiquitinase USP13 maintains glioblastoma stem cells by antagonizing FBXL14-mediated Myc ubiquitination. J Exp Med. 2017;214:245–67.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Ueda T, Nagamachi A, Takubo K, et al. Fbxl10 overexpression in murine hematopoietic stem cells induces leukemia involving metabolic activation and upregulation of Nsg2. Blood. 2015;125:3437–46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Sanchez-Diaz PC, Chang JC, Moses ES, et al. Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 (UCHL1) is associated with stem-like cancer cell functions in pediatric high-grade glioma. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176879.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement