Skip to main content
Download PDF

Intravenous delivery of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves brain repair in hyperglycemic stroke rats

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 10, Article number: 212 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Over 50% of acute stroke patients have hyperglycemia, which is associated with a poorer prognosis and outcome. Our aim was to investigate the impact of hyperglycemia on behavioral recovery and brain repair of delivered human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAD-MSCs) in a rat model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO).

Methods

Hyperglycemia was induced in rats by the administration of nicotinamide and streptozotocin. The rats were then subjected to stroke by a pMCAO model. At 48 h post-stroke, 1 × 106 hAD-MSCs or saline were intravenously administered. We evaluated behavioral outcome, infarct size by MRI, and brain plasticity markers by immunohistochemistry (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], Iba-1, synaptophysin, doublecortin, CD-31, collagen-IV, and α-smooth muscle actin [α-SMA]).

Results

The hyperglycemic group exhibited more severe neurological deficits; lesion size and diffusion coefficient were larger compared with the non-hyperglycemic rats. GFAP, Iba-1, and α-SMA were increased in the hyperglycemic group. The hyperglycemic rats administered hAD-MSCs at 48 h after pMCAO had improved neurological impairment. Although T2-MRI did not show differences in lesion size between groups, the rADC values were lower in the treated group. Finally, the levels of GFAP, Iba-1, and arterial wall thickness were lower in the treated hyperglycemic group than in the nontreated hyperglycemic group at 6 weeks post-stroke.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that rats with hyperglycemic ischemic stroke exhibit increased lesion size and impaired brain repair processes, which lead to impairments in behavioral recovery after pMCAO. More importantly, hAD-MSC administration induced better anatomical tissue preservation, associated with a good behavioral outcome.

Background

Stroke is a significant public health issue and is the most common cause of death and disability worldwide [1]. To date, only intravenous thrombolysis (tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy have been shown to be effective in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. However, the narrow therapeutic window (< 4.5 h for tPA and < 6–24 h for endovascular treatment [2, 3]) limits its application to a small percentage of patients. Cell therapy is an interesting and promising approach in stroke research. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), among others, have been shown to improve functional recovery, with an increase in markers related to brain repair in experimental animal models of stroke [4, 5].

Hyperglycemia is present in a significant proportion of patients without diabetes [6]. Various studies have demonstrated that more than 50% of acute stroke patients present hyperglycemia on admission which predicts higher mortality and morbidity [7,8,9]. In experimental animal models, hyperglycemia in acute stroke is associated with a poor outcome, exacerbating processes involved in ischemic brain injury [10, 11]. Despite the high percentage of patients with comorbidities, most of the preclinical models are performed on healthy and young animals. Moreover, the effects of comorbidities including hyperglycemia on therapeutic effects are poorly studied [12], although this aspect is emphasized in The Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke (STEPS) recommendations [13, 14].

To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate whether the MSC treatment could improve functional outcome post-stroke in rats, even in hyperglycemic conditions. Therefore, our aim was to assess the impact of hyperglycemia on infarct size and behavioral recovery in a rat model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO). We also sought to evaluate the effect of hyperglycemia on the therapeutic response to intravenous administration of human AD-MSCs (hAD-MSCs) in an experimental model of ischemic stroke.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The procedure was carried out at our Cerebrovascular and Neuroscience Research Laboratory, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. All experiments were designed to minimize animal suffering of animals in compliance and approved by our medical school’s Ethical Committee for the Care and Use of Animals in Research (Ref. PROEX 249/15) according to the Spanish (RD 1201/2005 and RD53/2013) and European Union (EU) (86/609/CEE, 2003/65/CE, 2010/63/EU) rules. Experiments were conducted according to the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research in terms of randomization, blinding, and statistical power (https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines).

Cell culture protocol, characterization, and hAD-MSC isolation

The hAD-MSCs obtained from the French Blood Establishment (EFS, La Tronche, France) were cultured. The cells were thawed, expanded (using a seeding density of 2 × 103 viable cells/cm2) on tissue culture flasks (Fisher Scientific), and maintained in Minimum Essential Media-alpha (1X) (MEM-Alpha, Gibco), supplemented with 5% PLTMax Human Platelet Lysate (Merck) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The phenotypic pattern of the cells was studied using flow cytometry, the positive expression of CD90, CD73, CD105, and CD44 (≥ 90%), and the lack of expression of CD11b, CD19, CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR were detected (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Human AD-MSC cell culture protocol. Human AD-MSCs were thawed and cultured for their expansion on tissue culture flasks for 6 days. The phenotypic pattern of the cells was studied using flow cytometry, the positive expression of CD90, CD73, CD105 and CD44 (≥ 90%), and the lack of expression of CD11b, CD19, CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR were detected. Cell viability was studied and the cells were prepared for intravenous administration. b Experimental animal protocol. One week before stroke induction, hyperglycemia was induced in the rats with two intraperitoneal injections (nicotinamide and 15 min later streptozotocin). After 72 h and 6 weeks, blood glucose concentrations were determined. Rats were subjected to a cortical stroke by permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion and divided into groups. Forty-eight hours after surgery, 1 × 106 hAD-MSCs or saline solution was administered. Functional evaluation was performed before surgery and at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks post-stroke, and MRI was analyzed at 24 h and 6 weeks post-stroke. Six weeks post-stroke, the animals were euthanized and histological analyses were performed. Abbreviations: pMCAO: permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; hAD-MSCs: human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Full size image

Cell viability was studied using 0.4% trypan blue (Trypan Blue solution, Sigma) and a Nikon Inverted Microscope Diaphot-TMD (Japan) with × 10 objective lens and a Nikon Phase Contrast-2 ELWD 0.3 Condenser (Japan). When the cells reached > 90% confluence, the hAD-MSCs were trypsinized (trypsin 0.25% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution [Biowest]) and centrifuged 10 min at 1250 rpm at room temperature. One million cells were resuspended in 1 ml saline for intravenous administration (Fig. 1a).

Animals, hyperglycemia induction, and surgery

Hyperglycemia was induced using nicotinamide-streptozotocin. Streptozotocin has a nonspecific action in the body that causes organ deterioration due to its cytotoxic action [15, 16]. Nicotinamide was used to prevent organ damage [15]. In the present study, hyperglycemia was induced by an intraperitoneal injection with nicotinamide (210 mg/kg) (EMD Millipore, Germany) followed 15 min later with an intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) (EMD Millipore, Germany). After 72 h and again at 6 weeks, blood glucose concentration was determined using a glucose meter (ACCU-CHEK, Performa, Germany), and the animals with a blood glucose concentration above 250 mg/dl were considered hyperglycemic [17].

A total of 57 male Sprague-Dawley rats (8–9 weeks old, weighing 200–250 g) were used for the study. The rats were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of a solution of ketamine (25 mg/kg) and diazepam (2 mg/kg) at a dose of 2.5 ml/kg. Analgesia was induced by subcutaneous injection of meloxicam (2 mg/kg). To perform the pMCAO, a small craniotomy was performed; the right middle cerebral artery (MCA) was permanently ligated just before its bifurcation and both common carotid arteries were then occluded for 60 min as previously described [18].

The rats were randomly assigned to the following groups: the sham group was subjected to surgery without infarction (n = 10); the non-hyperglycemic group was subjected to a pMCAO and received intravenous saline (n = 10); the nontreated hyperglycemic group was subjected to a pMCAO and received intravenous saline (n = 10); and the treated hyperglycemic group was subjected to a pMCAO and received intravenous hAD-MSCs (n = 11). Saline solution or 1 × 106 hAD-MSCs in 1 ml of saline solution was administered via the tail vein at 48 h after surgery. All the animals were euthanized at 6 weeks post-stroke (Fig. 1b).

Functional evaluation scales

Functional evaluations were performed on all the rats by a blind observer before surgery and at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks post-stroke induction. Motor and sensory performance was evaluated using the Rogers, beam walking, and adhesive removal tests. A variant of Rogers’ functional scale was used to assign scores as follows: 0, no functional deficit; 1, failure to extend forepaw fully; 2, decreased grip of forelimb while tail gently pulled; 3, spontaneous movement in all directions, contralateral circling only if pulled by the tail; 4, circling; 5, walking only when stimulated; 6, unresponsive to stimulation with a depressed level of consciousness; and 7, dead [19]. The beam walking test evaluated hindlimb functions [20] by the capacity of the rats to traverse a wooden beam. We calculated the left hind limb slip ratio as follows: (total slips + 0.5 × half slips)/total steps × 100% [21]. To assess the forelimb sensory asymmetry, the adhesive removal test was performed [20]. For this test, a sticker was placed on the palm of both forelimbs of the rat and contact and removal times were recorded [22].

In vivo magnetic resonance imaging

Lesion size was analyzed at 24 h and 6 weeks post-stroke by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Bruker Pharmascan, Ettlingen, Germany); 7-T horizontal bore magnets using T2-weighted (T2-W) spin-echo anatomical images acquired with a rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) sequence in axial orientations and the following parameters: two echo images (TE, 29.54 ms and 88.61 ms); TR = 3000 ms; RARE factor = 4; Av = 3; FOV = 3.5 cm; acquisition matrix = 256 × 256 corresponding to an in-plane resolution of 137 × 137 μm2; slice thickness = 1.00 mm without gap; and number of slices = 16.

We used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Images were obtained with three different directions defined by the read, phase, and slice encoding gradients using a multi-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence. Acquisition conditions were diffusion gradient duration, 3 ms; diffusion gradient separation, 18 ms; TR, 3000 ms; TE, 50 ms; FOV, 3.8 cm; axial slices (1.5 mm thickness) and 3 b values 100, 400, and 1000s/mm2; acquisition matrix = 128 × 128. To normalize the ADC values, the ROI of the lesion and the same ROI in the contralateral side were divided by the value in the contralateral normal hemisphere and expressed as a relative ADC (rADC) of the region [23].

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

The histopathological changes in the cortex were studied by H&E staining. Slices were immersed 10 s in hematoxylin and 1 min in eosin. Finally, they were dehydrated and coverslipped with DePex. The multipolar motor neurons were observed using a × 20 objective lens and processed by image analysis software (Image-Pro Plus 4.1, Media Cybernetics) (3 rats for each group, 4 sections in each rat per group). Cell counts were expressed as individual values and as the mean number of viable neurons/mm2 [24].

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

The perilesional area around the lesion core was defined on brain sections at 6 weeks post-stroke by microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) staining (1:1000, Millipore) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) staining (1:500, Millipore) (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The samples were sectioned at 10 μm thickness using a Leica CM1950 cryostat (Leica). Immunohistochemistry images were obtained using a × 20 and × 40 objective lens, and processed by image analysis software (Image-Pro Plus 4.1, Media Cybernetics).

The perilesional area was studied in detail using immunofluorescence for astrocytes with GFAP (1:500, Millipore); microglia with Iba-1 (1:1000, Millipore); synaptic plasticity with synaptophysin (1:200, Sigma); neurons with doublecortin (1:250, Santa Cruz); endothelium with platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD-31) (1:50, Abcam), collagen-IV (1:400, Abcam), and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (1:200, Abcam), followed by goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (1:750, Invitrogen). Immunofluorescence images were acquired as a confocal maximum projection using a Leica TCS-SPE confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany), using a × 40 objective lens, and analyzed using LAS AF software (Leica). Mean fluorescence intensity was measured by the NIS-Element AR (Nikon) 4.5 Program. The experiments, images, and quantification of the samples were performed by blinded observers using the same microscope configurations to eliminate bias due to background normalization (3 rats for each group, 4 sections in each rat per group).

Statistical analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and the data were compared using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Mann–Whitney U test as the data followed a non-normal distribution. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant at a 95% confidence interval; the data were calculated using the IBM SPSS statistical program 22 and GraphPad Prism 7 software. The rats removed from the study were immediately replaced by new subjects that were randomly allocated to the experimental groups until a total number of 10 rats per group was reached. The power analysis showed that with nonparametric testing for infarct size and behavioral tests, at least 10 rats needed to be randomized to each group for a significance level of 5% (alpha) and a power of 80% (1-beta).

Results

Mortality

Sixteen rats were excluded from the study: 13 died after surgical induction of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) (ten from the hyperglycemic group and three from the nonhyperglycemic group) and three were excluded because they did not show lesions on MRI analysis.

Hyperglycemia-associated stroke-induced impairment of motor function

The hyperglycemic group exhibited more severe neurological deficits, measured by the beam walking test at 1, 3, and 6 weeks post-stroke, compared with the non-hyperglycemic group (p < 0.05). The Rogers and adhesive removal tests showed no significant differences between the non-hyperglycemic and the hyperglycemic groups at all study times (p > 0.05) (Fig. 2a, c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functional evaluation of motor and sensory performance. Representative graphs of the functional evaluation tests: Rogers, beam walking (a, b) and adhesive removal (c, d) tests before stroke induction (baseline) and at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks after permanent stroke. The sham-operated rats did not have any functional deficits. The hyperglycemic rats had poorer functional outcome than the non-hyperglycemic in the beam walking test at 1, 3, and 6 weeks post-stroke. The treated hyperglycemic rats showed better functional recovery compared with the hyperglycemic group without treatment in the Rogers test at 3 and 6 weeks and the beam walking test at 1, 3, and 6 weeks post-stroke (n = 10 animals per group). Data are shown as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05

Full size image

hAD-MSC treatment significantly improved post-stroke neurological outcome in hyperglycemic rats

hAD-MSC treatment after pMCAO in hyperglycemic rats significantly improved neurological recovery compared with the nontreated hyperglycemic group, as indicated by the Rogers (at 3 and 6 weeks) and walking beam (at 1, 3, and 6 weeks) tests (p < 0.05).

The adhesive removal test showed no significant differences between the nontreated hyperglycemic and the treated hyperglycemic groups (p > 0.05) (Fig. 2b, d).

There were no significant differences in blood glucose level between non-treated hyperglycemic rats (before MCAO 351.75 ± 73.35 mg/dl; before euthanasia 445.0 ± 42.42 mg/dl) and treated hyperglycemic rats (before MCAO 368.5 ± 70.76 mg/dl; before euthanasia 408.0 ± 51.50 mg/dl) P > 0.05. It can be inferred that hAD-MSC treatment induces recovery which is not related to changes in blood glucose levels.

Hyperglycemia significantly increased lesion size and diffusion coefficients after stroke in rats

The lesion size of the hyperglycemic group was significantly higher than that of the non-hyperglycemic group at 24 h (p < 0.001) and 6 weeks (p < 0.04) (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a MRI analysis. Representative T2-weighted MRI at 24 h and 6 weeks and rADC images at 6 weeks post-stroke. At 24 h and 6 weeks post-stroke, quantitative graphs of T2-weighted MRI showed a significantly higher lesion size in the hyperglycemic group compared with the non-hyperglycemic group. At 6 weeks post-stroke, the non-hyperglycemic and the treated hyperglycemic groups in the rADC images showed lower diffusion coefficients compared with the hyperglycemic rats (n = 10 animals per group). b Histopathological analysis. Representative H&E staining images in the cortex at 6 weeks. A significant increase in the number of surviving neurons was observed in the hyperglycemic treated group compared to the nontreated hyperglycemic group. (3 animals per group, 4 sections in each animal per group). Data are shown as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05. Abbreviations: MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; rADC: relative apparent diffusion coefficient; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin

Full size image

The rADC analysis showed significantly higher diffusion coefficients in the hyperglycemic rats compared with the non-hyperglycemic (p < 0.04) at 6 weeks post-stroke (Fig. 3a).

Hyperglycemia had no effect on the number of surviving neurons compared to non-hyperglycemic rats (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3b).

hAD-MSC treatment did not reduce lesion size but significantly decreased diffusion and increased the number of surviving neurons post-stroke in hyperglycemic rats

At 24 h and 6 weeks, hAD-MSC treatment in the hyperglycemic rats did not decrease lesion size compared with the nontreated hyperglycemic group (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3a).

At 6 weeks post-stroke, the rADC values were higher in the nontreated hyperglycemic rats than in the treated hyperglycemic group (p < 0.03) (Fig. 3a).

The treated hyperglycemic group showed an increased in the number of surviving multipolar motor neurons compared with the nontreated hyperglycemic group (p < 0.003) (Fig. 3b).

Hyperglycemia contributed to increased astrocyte and microglia markers

There were increases in GFAP (p < 0.03) and Iba-1 (p < 0.012) levels in the hyperglycemic group compared with the non-hyperglycemic group (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Brain repair markers related to glia and neurons at 6 weeks post-stroke by immunofluorescence. Representative images and quantification of immunofluorescence of GFAP, Iba-1, synaptophysin, and doublecortin. At 6 weeks post-stroke, the hyperglycemic rats showed significantly higher levels of GFAP and Iba-1 compared with the non-hyperglycemic and treated hyperglycemic groups. 4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used for nuclear staining (3 animals per group, 4 sections in each animal per group). Data are shown as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05. Abbreviations: GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; SYP: synaptophysin; DCX: doublecortin

Full size image

hAD-MSC treatment decreased astrocytes and microglia post-stroke in hyperglycemic rats

To evaluate the effect of hAD-MSC treatment on glial cells, brain tissues were stained for the astrocyte marker GFAP and the microglia marker Iba-1. The expression of GFAP (p < 0.001) and Iba-1 (p < 0.03) was lower in the treated hyperglycemic group than in the nontreated hyperglycemic group at 6 weeks post-stroke (Fig. 4).

Hyperglycemia induction has no effect on synaptogenesis and neurogenesis

The non-hyperglycemic rats did not show differences in the expression of synaptophysin and doublecortin compared with the hyperglycemic rats (p > 0.05) (Fig. 4).

hAD-MSC treatment did not promote synaptogenesis and neurogenesis post-stroke in hyperglycemic rats

No differences were found between the hyperglycemic and treated rats in relation to synaptophysin and doublecortin staining at 6 weeks post-stroke (p > 0.05) (Fig. 4).

Hyperglycemia had an effect on α-SMA, but not on vascular markers CD31 and collagen-IV

We found no differences in the expression of CD31 and collagen-IV markers between the non-hyperglycemic and hyperglycemic rats (p > 0.05). However, we found that hyperglycemia significantly increased α-SMA compared with the non-hyperglycemic group (p < 0.004) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Vascular markers at 6 weeks post-stroke by immunofluorescence. Representative images and quantification of immunofluorescence of CD31, collagen-IV, and α-SMA. At 6 weeks post-stroke, the hyperglycemic rats showed significantly increased arterial wall thickness compared with the non-hyperglycemic and treated hyperglycemic groups. 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was used for nuclear staining (3 animals per group, 4 sections in each animal per group). Data are shown as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05. Abbreviations: α-SMA: α-smooth muscle actin

Full size image

hAD-MSC treatment did not promote the formation of blood vessels but decreased arterial wall thickness

Our results suggest that the treatment did not promote blood vessel reconstruction in terms of CD-31 and collagen-IV markers compared with the hyperglycemic group (p > 0.05). However, we observed that α-SMA significantly decreased in the treated hyperglycemic rats compared with the hyperglycemic group (p < 0.015) (Fig. 5).

Discussion

To date, the majority of the experimental animal studies of stroke associated with hyperglycemia have been performed using ischemia/reperfusion models. However, a high percentage of patients do not recanalize. Thus, it is important to introduce permanent ischemia models in order to understand the exact mechanisms by which hyperglycemia leads to poorer functional outcomes, as well as to continue investigating therapies that have demonstrated efficacy in stroke models without associated comorbidities.

Previous studies from our group have demonstrated that AD-MSC administration improves functional recovery, decreased cell death and increased brain plasticity markers after pMCAO [5, 25]. However, the present study is the first to investigate whether AD-MSC treatment could improve the functional outcome post-stroke in hyperglycemic rats, a comorbidity that remains relatively under explored.

It has been shown that hyperglycemia worsens damage probably by enhancing the production of lactic acid during ischemia. Ischemia blocks or retards the stage of pyruvate oxidation and leads to the reduction of pyruvate to lactate. The net result of the anaerobic metabolism of glucose is the production of lactate- and of H+. Thus, the enhancement of glucose supply by hyperglycemia may exaggerate the acidosis. The adverse effects of acidosis may promote edema formation by inducing Na+ and Cl− accumulation via coupled Na+/H+ and C1−/HCO3− exchange. Thus, the severity of the acidosis and exacerbated brain damage correlates to the preischemic hyperglycemia. This brain injury implicates damage to neurons, glial cells, and/ or vascular endothelium as well [26]. Our study confirmed that hyperglycemic ischemic rats exhibit an increased lesion size and impaired brain repair processes, and demonstrated an increase in the inflammatory response (Iba 1 and GFAP) and in the thickness of the arterial wall (α-SMA), which likely contribute to exacerbated impairments of behavioral recovery.

We also evaluated the repair effect of intravenous delivery of hAD-MSCs in a rat model of pMCAO associated with hyperglycemia. Our results demonstrated that hAD-MSC treatment induces lower diffusion coefficients with a decrease in the inflammatory response and in the thickness of the arterial wall, which is associated with a good behavioral outcome.

Stroke patients are a heterogeneous population that has associated comorbidities, such as hyperglycemia. Over 50% of acute stroke patients suffer from hyperglycemia, which is associated with a poorer prognosis and outcome [7, 9, 11]. Moreover, comorbidities themselves may exert a detrimental impact on treatment efficacy [27]. For this reason, it is important to introduce comorbidities in the experimental animal stroke model to mimic the patient’s situation and to test the efficacy of new treatments, avoiding pitfalls in translational research [27].

The exacerbated damage from hyperglycemia is typically observed in animal ischemic stroke models [10]. Our results are consistent with previous experimental data in which, animals with ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia tended to have poorer neurological recovery and increased ischemic infarct size compared to ischemic controls [10, 28,29,30,31]. Additionally, in our study, hyperglycemia enhanced diffusion coefficients. High rADC values are associated with loss of cell membrane integrity, apoptosis, shrinkage and tissue liquefaction necrosis at 30 days post-stroke [24], suggesting that higher diffusion coefficients represent poorer anatomical tissue preservation, without affecting the number of surviving neurons in the present study. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of AD-MSCs in animal models of ischemic stroke [5, 32,33,34]. However, whether hyperglycemia has an impact on therapeutic response has not yet been studied. In the present study, we demonstrated that the rats treated with hAD-MSCs achieved a good behavioral recovery without reducing lesion size compared with the nontreated hyperglycemic group. In line with our results, previous animal studies have reported that post-stroke cell therapy in type 2 diabetic rats promotes neurological functional outcome without affecting infarction volume [35,36,37]. However, in the present study, the rADC values were significantly lower in the group that received hAD-MSCs at the chronic phase. It has been described that low rADC levels are related to reduced nerve cell damage and promoting the repair of axon and myelin on the 30th day post-stroke [24]. In this sense, we have shown that hAD-MSCs administration significantly increased the number of multipolar motor neurons in the cortex, suggesting that treatment protected neuronal cells, indicating better tissue preservation post-stroke.

Ischemic injury has been related to reactive astrocytes [38, 39]. However, it has been reported that diabetic rats show inhibited astrocyte activation after ischemic stroke [39]. Conversely, in our study, GFAP levels were increased in hyperglycemic stroke rats. This controversy is probably due to differences between the diabetes model (only streptozotocin) and the stroke model used (intraluminal filament and exsanguination) compared with our study. We also detected a reduction in the glial marker GFAP after hAD-MSC administration, in accordance with previous studies [38, 40].

Inflammatory responses play an important role in post-stroke recovery. Although mild to moderate inflammation can be beneficial to brain repair, exacerbated inflammation can impede recovery and create an inhospitable environment for brain repair. In accordance with earlier studies [31, 41], we found an increase in the levels of microglia marker in hyperglycemic pMCAO rats compared with non-hyperglycemic rats. In addition, we observed that the cell treatment decreased the expression of the microglia marker.

We evaluated the expression of doublecortin and synaptophysin in the peri-infarct zone to study the role of hyperglycemia in neurogenesis and synaptogenesis. Previous studies have indicated that long-term hyperglycemia suppresses the proliferation of hippocampus neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) [42,43,44], whereas other researchers have found an enhanced proliferation of NSPCs [45, 46]. Other authors have demonstrated that severe (20 mM) instead of mild (10 mM) hyperglycemia exacerbates ischemic injury and inhibits stroke-induced subventricular zone neurogenesis [47] and that diabetes leads to greater post-stroke spine loss which could indicate a decrease in synapses [48]. In our study, however, hyperglycemia had no effects on neurogenesis and synaptogenesis. The discrepancy among studies could be attributed to the different models used to induce hyperglycemia and stroke (transient and permanent). The efficacy of stem cell treatment on neurogenesis has been investigated by a number of studies, in which human marrow stromal cell administration increases doublecortin density post-stroke in diabetic rats [36]; however, we found that the administration of hAD-MSCs at 48 h post-stroke had no effect on the levels of doublecortin marker. Instead, our results regarding synaptophysin, a marker related to synaptic plasticity, are consistent with some articles that showed similar levels of synaptophysin between diabetic animals with and without bone marrow stromal cells [49].

Hyperglycemia and diabetes play an important role in the pathogenesis of vascular complications. We evaluated the expression of several vascular markers (CD31, collagen-IV, and α-SMA) in pMCAO model in rats. Experimental animal models in transient stroke have demonstrated increased cerebral ischemia–reperfusion-induced blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption and neurovascular damage [11, 50,51,52]. Consistent with these studies, the rats with hyperglycemia showed significantly increased arterial wall thickness compared with the non-hyperglycemic group. However, our results showed that hyperglycemia did not affect the expression of CD31 or collagen-IV, perhaps because we used a permanent model instead of a transient one, contributing to exacerbated neurovascular injury as a consequence of the reperfusion. Finally, when we evaluated the effect of cell therapy, hAD-MSCs only had a significant effect on the decrease in arterial wall thickness, but it had no effect on the expression of the other markers analyzed in the study.

The precise mechanism of the therapeutic action of MSCs remains unclear. Many molecular and cellular mechanisms such as enhanced endogenous neurogenesis, trophic factor secretion, cell replacement, the formation of biobridges, and more have been suggested but not fully documented [53]. In order to elucidate these mechanisms, previous studies from our laboratory analyzed the migration and implantation of MSC when they were administered intravenously. MSC were magnetically labeled using Endorem™ (superparamagnetic iron oxide) and with a lipophilic agent using DiI and their biodistribution was analyzed in vivo by magnetic resonance [18] and after sacrifice by immunofluorescence [18, 54]. MSC were not observed in the brain, but they were found in peripheral organs (liver, lung and spleen). Even from the distance, in both studies MSC showed efficacy in promoting brain repair. These results suggest that MSC does not need to reach the brain to exert recovery after a stroke. These results agrees with other studies where estimated that only 1% of the injected cells were detected in the brain after i.v. administration of MSC [55] and that most of these cells had accumulated in internal organs such as the lungs, liver, and spleen [25, 56]. In this regards, transient early lung trapping was observed after intravenous administration of MSC radiolabeled with 370 MBq of 99mTc the HMPAO and visualized by Whole-Body Nuclear Imaging. In this study, some MSC seems to be able to migrate to the ischemic brain lesion and are eliminated by kidneys [57]. These data suggest that administered MSC have the potential to enhance brain repair mechanisms from the distance by releasing products such as trophic factors, immunomodulatory molecules, and even extracellular vesicles. Therefore, preclinical data is still needed to understand the mechanism of action of these cells to better interpret their therapeutic effects.

Regarding cryopreservation, there is an ongoing debate whether cell cryopreservation, being mandatory in a clinical scenario, compromises the cell’s therapeutic impact [58]. It seems that the cryopreservation of cells might play a role [59]. Future preclinical studies should be conducted with fresh cells to study whether their therapeutic effect could be affected by this cryopreservation.

Thus, the present data on permanent ischemia models highlights novel mechanisms how hyperglycemia leads to a worse behavioral outcome, establishing a basis for further studies investigating therapies effects comorbid conditions.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data suggest that rats with hyperglycemic ischemic stroke exhibit an increased lesion size and impaired brain repair processes, which likely contribute to exacerbated behavioral impairments. In addition, hAD-MSC treatment showed better anatomical tissue preservation with a decrease in the inflammatory response and in the thickness of the arterial wall, together with the improved behavioral outcome.

Availability of data and materials

The original data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

ADC:

Apparent diffusion coefficient

AD-MSCs:

Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

BBB:

Blood–brain barrier

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

hAD-MSCs:

Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NSPCs:

Neural stem/progenitor cells

pMCAO:

Permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion

rADC:

Relative apparent diffusion coefficient

SD:

Standard deviation

STEPS:

Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke

tPA:

tisular Plasminogen Activator

α-SMA:

α-Smooth muscle actin

References

  1. WHO. Neurological disorders associated with malnutrition. Neurol Disord Public Heal Challenges. 2014:111–75.

  2. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):708–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roguiera RQ, Jovin T. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. 2018;3781378:11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leu S, Lin YC, Yuen CM, Yen CH, Kao YH, Sun CK, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells markedly attenuate brain infarct size and improve neurological function in rats. J Transl Med. 2010;8:11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Ramos-Cejudo J, Teresa Vallejo-Cremades M, Fuentes B, Cerdán S, et al. Effects of intravenous administration of allogenic bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells on functional recovery and brain repair markers in experimental ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruyt ND, Biessels GJ, Devries JH, Roos YB. Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke: pathophysiology and clinical management. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:145–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weir CJ, Murray GD, Dyker AG, Lees KR. Is hyperglycaemia an independent predictor of poor outcome after acute stroke? Results of a long-term follow up study. BMJ. 1997;314:1303–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams LS, Rotich J, Qi R, Fineberg N, Espay A, Bruno A, et al. Effects of admission hyperglycemia on mortality and costs in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2002;59:67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuentes B, Castillo J, José BS, Leira R, Serena J, Vivancos J, et al. The prognostic value of capillary glucose levels in acute stroke the GLycemia in acute stroke (GLIAS) study. Stroke. 2009;40:562–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruno A, Liebeskind D, Hao Q, Raychev R, UCLA Stroke Investigators. Diabetes mellitus, acute hyperglycemia, and ischemic stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2010;12:492–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hafez S, Coucha M, Bruno A, Fagan S, Ergul A. Hyperglycemia, acute ischemic stroke, and thrombolytic therapy. Trans Stroke Res. 2014;5:442–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Detante O, Muir K, Jolkkonen J. Cell therapy in stroke—cautious steps towards a clinical treatment. Transl Stroke Res. 2018;9:321–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wechsler L, Steindler D, Borlongan C, Chopp M, Savitz S, Deans R, et al. Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke Participants. Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke (STEPS): bridging basic and clinical science for cellular and neurogenic factor therapy in treating stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:510–515.

  14. Savitz SI, Chopp M, Deans R, Carmichael T, Phinney D, Wechsler L, STEPS Participants. Stem Cell Therapy as an Emerging Paradigm for Stroke (STEPS) II. Stroke. 2011;42:825–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Szkudelski T. Streptozotocin–nicotinamide-induced diabetes in the rat. Characteristics of the experimental model. Exp Biol Med. 2012;237:481–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qinna NA, Badwan AA. Impact of streptozotocin on altering normal glucose homeostasis during insulin testing in diabetic rats compared to normoglycemic rats. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:2515–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Chopp M, Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Li CSN, et al. Diabetes impairs cognitive function in middle aged rats and neurological recovery in middle aged rats after stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:2112–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Alvarez-Grech J, Vallejo-Cremades MT, Expósito-Alcaide M, Merino J, et al. Functional recovery after hematic administration of allogenic mesenchymal stem cells in acute ischemic stroke in rats. Neuroscience. 2011;175:394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers DA, Campbell CA, Stretton JL, Mackay KB. Correlation between motor impairment and infarct volume after permanent and transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Stroke. 1997;28:2060–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boltze J, Lukomska B, Jolkkonen J. Mesenchymal stromal cells ins troke: improvement of motor recovery or functional compensation? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:1420–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schallert T, Woodlee MT, Fleming SM, Schallert T, Woodlee MTFS. Disentangling multiple types of recovery from brain injury recovery of function. Pharmacol Cereb Ischemia. 2002:201–16.

  22. Schallert T, Fleming SM, Leasure JL, Tillerson JL, Bland ST. CNS plasticity and assessment of forelimb sensorimotor outcome in unilateral rat models of stroke, cortical ablation, parkinsonism and spinal cord injury. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:777–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Henriques IL, Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Ramos-Cejudo J, Otero-Ortega L, Navarro Hernanz T, et al. Intralesional patterns of MRI ADC maps predict outcome in experimental stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39:293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang J, Chen S, Shi W, Li M, Zhan Y, Yang L, et al. Effects of Xiaoshuan enteric coated capsule on white and gray matter injury evaluated by diffusion tensor imaging in ischemic stroke. Cell Transplant. 2018;963689718802755.

  25. Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Ramos-Cejudo J, Otero-Ortega L, Fuentes B, Vallejo-Cremades MT, et al. Comparison between xenogeneic and allogeneic adipose mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of acute cerebral infarct: proof of concept in rats. J Transl Med. 2015;13:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siesjö BK. Pathophysiology and treatment of focal cerebral ischemia. Part I: Pathophysiology. J Neurosurg. 1992;77:169–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cui LL, Golubczyk D, Tolppanen AM, Boltze J, Jolkkonen J. Cell therapy for ischemic stroke: are differences in preclinical and clinical study design responsible for the translational loss of efficacy? Ann Neurol. 2019. In press.

  28. Rehncrona S, Rosen I, Siesjo BK. Brain lactic acidosis and ischemic cell damage, 1: biochemistry and neurophysiology. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1981;1:297–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nedergaard M. Transient focal ischemia in hyperglycemic rats is associated with increased cerebral infarction. Brain Res. 1987;408:79–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Desilles JP, Syvannarath V, Ollivier V, Journé C, Delbosc S, Ducroux C, et al. Exacerbation of thromboinflammation by hyperglycemia precipitates cerebral infarct growth and hemorrhagic transformation. Stroke. 2017;48:1932–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma S, Wang J, Wang Y, Dai X, Xu F, Gao X, et al. Diabetes mellitus impairs white matter repair and long-term functional deficits after cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2018;49:2453–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ikegame Y, Yamashita K, Hayashi S-I, Mizuno H, Tawada M, You F, et al. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow for ischemic stroke therapy. Cytotherapy. 2011;13:675–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Otero-Ortega L, Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Ramos-Cejudo J, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Fuentes B, Sobrino T, et al. White matter injury restoration after stem cell administration in subcortical ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou F, Gao S, Wang L, Sun C, Chen L, Yuan P, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells partially rescue the stroke syndromes by promoting spatial learning and memory in mouse middle cerebral artery occlusion model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan T, Venkat P, Chopp M, Zacharek A, Ning R, Cui Y, et al. Neurorestorative therapy of stroke in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats treated with human umbilical cord blood cells. Stroke. 2015;46:2599–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan T, Venkat P, Chopp M, Zacharek A, Ning RRC, et al. Neurorestorative responses to delayed hMSC treatment of stroke in type 2 diabetic rats. Stroke. 2016;47:2850–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen J, Ning R, Zacharek A, Cui C, Cui X, Yan T, et al. MiR-126 contributes to human umbilical cord blood cell-induced neurorestorative effects after stroke in type-2 diabetic mice. Stem Cells. 2016;34:102–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chung JY, Kim W, Im W, Yoo DY, Choi JH, Hwang IK, et al. Neuroprotective effects of adipose-derived stem cells against ischemic neuronal damage in the rabbit spinal cord. J Neurol Sci. 2012;317:40–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Venkat P, Chopp M, Chen J. Blood- brain barrier disruption, vascular impairment, and ischemia/reperfusion damage in diabetic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(6).

  40. Zhou F, Gao S, Wang L, Sun C, Chen L, Yuan P, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells partially rescue the stroke syndromes by promoting spatial learning and memory in mouse middle cerebral artery occlusion model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu Q, Manaenko A, Bian H, Guo Z, Huang JL, Guo ZN, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen reduces infarction volume and hemorrhagic transformation through ATP/NAD+/Sirt1 pathway in hyperglycemic middle cerebral artery occlusion rats. Stroke. 2017;48:1655–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beauquis J, Roig P, Homo-Delarche F, De Nicola A, Saravia F. Reduced hippocampal neurogenesis and number of hilar neurones in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice: reversion by antidepressant treatment. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:1539–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang WJ, Tan YF, Yue JT, Vranic M, Wojtowicz JM. Impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis in streptozotoc intreated diabetic rats. Acta Neurol Scand. 2008;117:205–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo J, Yu C, Li H, Liu F, Feng R, Wang H, et al. Impaired neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation instreptozotocin-induced and spontaneous diabetic mice. Neurosci Res. 2010;68:329–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lang BT, Yan Y, Dempsey RJ, Vemuganti R. Impaired neurogenesis in adult type-2 diabetic rats. Brain Res. 2009;1258:25–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ramos-Rodriguez JJ, Molina-Gil S, Ortiz-Barajas O, Jimenez- Palomares M, Perdomo G, Cozar-Castellano I, et al. Central proliferation and neurogenesis is impaired in type 2 diabetes and prediabetes animal models. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tan S, Zhi PK, Luo ZK, Shi J. Severe instead of mild hyperglycemia inhibits neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of adult rats after transient focal cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience. 2015;303:138–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Reeson P, Tennant KA, Gerrow K, Wang J, Weiser Novak S, Thompson K, et al. Delayed inhibition of VEGF signaling after stroke attenuates blood-brain barrier breakdown and improves functional recovery in a comorbidity-dependent manner. J Neurosci. 2015;35:5128–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ye X, Yan T, Chopp M, Zacharek A, Ning R, Venkat P, et al. Combination BMSC and Niaspan treatment of stroke enhances white matter remodeling and synaptic protein expression in diabetic rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:22221–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xing Y, Jiang X, Yang Y, Xi G. Hemorrhagic transformation induced by acute hyperglycemia in a rat model of transient focal ischemia. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;111:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yan T, Chopp M, Ning R, Zacharek A, Roberts C, Chen J. Intracranial aneurysm formation in type-one diabetes rats. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. McBride DW, Legrand J, Krafft PR, Flores J, Klebe D, Tang J, et al. Acute hyperglycemia is associated with immediate brain swelling and hemorrhagic transformation after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;121:237–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Incontri Abraham D, Gonzales M, Ibarra A, Borlongan CV. Stand alone or join forces? Stem cell therapy for stroke. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018; In press.

  54. Otero-Ortega L, Gutiérrez-Fernández M, Ramos-Cejudo J, Rodríguez-Frutos B, Fuentes B, et al. White matter injury restoration after stem cell administration in subcortical ischemic stroke. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;19(6):121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen J, Sanberg PR, Li Y, Wang L, Lu M, et al. Intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood reduces behavioral deficits after stroke in rats. Stroke. 2001;32:2682–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Phinney DG, Prockop DJ. Concise review: mesenchymal stem/multipotent stromal cells: the state of transdifferentiation and modes of tissue repair current views. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2896–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Detante O, Moisan A, Dimastromatteo J, Richard MJ, Riou L, et al. Intravenous administration of 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled human mesenchymal stem cells after stroke: in vivo imaging and biodistribution. Cell Transplant. 2009;18:1369–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Boltze J, Reich DM, Hau S, Reymann KG, Strassburger M, Lobsien D, et al. Assessment of neuroprotective effects of human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell subpopulations in vitro and in vivo. Cell Transplant. 2012;21:723–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Weise G, Lorenz M, Pösel C, Maria Riegelsberger U, Störbeck V, Kamprad M, et al. Transplantation of cryopreserved human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells does not induce sustained recovery after experimental stroke in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:e1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the support of Morote Traducciones S. L for editing assistance. We greatly appreciate the support of Jesús Díez Sebastian at Biostatistics’ section of La Paz University Hospital for statistics analysis assistance.

Steering Committee members: Detante O (Coordinator/ Principal Investigator, France), Díez-Tejedor E (Co-Principal Investigator, Spain), Fuentes B (Spain), Hommel M (France), Jaillard A (France), Jolkkonen J (Finland), Mikulik R (Czech Republic), Moisan A (France), Moniche F (Spain), Montaner J (Spain), Bustamante A (Spain), Muir K (United Kingdom), Numminen H (Finland), Koubi D (France), Bollart C (France), Keinonen T (Finland).

Funding

This study was supported by the RESSTORE project ( https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/198791/factsheet/en), funded by the European Commission under the Horizon2020 program (grant agreement No 681044), Miguel Servet (CP15/00069 to María Gutiérrez-Fernández) and Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral fellowship (IJCI-2017-33505 to Laura Otero-Ortega), European Social Fund - European Commission, a predoctoral fellowship (FI17/00188 to Mari Carmen Gómez-de Frutos), INVICTUS PLUS network (RD16/0019/0005) of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII), Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER Funding).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mari Carmen Gómez-de Frutos, Fernando Laso-García and Luke Diekhorst contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Neuroscience and Cerebrovascular Research Laboratory, La Paz University Hospital, Neuroscience Area of IdiPAZ Health Research Institute, Autonoma University of Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain

    Mari Carmen Gómez-de Frutos, Fernando Laso-García, Luke Diekhorst, Laura Otero-Ortega, Blanca Fuentes, Arturo Martínez-Arroyo, Exuperio Díez-Tejedor & María Gutiérrez-Fernández

  2. Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

    Jukka Jolkkonen

  3. NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

    Jukka Jolkkonen

  4. Neurology Department, Stroke Unit, Grenoble Hospital, Grenoble, France

    Olivier Detante

  5. Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, Inserm U1216, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France

    Olivier Detante & Anaick Moisan

  6. Cell Therapy and Engineering Unit, EFS Auvergne Rhône Alpes, Saint-Ismier, France

    Anaick Moisan

Authors
  1. Mari Carmen Gómez-de Frutos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando Laso-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luke Diekhorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Otero-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Blanca Fuentes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jukka Jolkkonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Olivier Detante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anaick Moisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Arturo Martínez-Arroyo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Exuperio Díez-Tejedor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. María Gutiérrez-Fernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of RESSTORE consortium

Contributions

MCGF contributed to the collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing, data analysis, and interpretation. FLG contributed to the collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing, data analysis, and interpretation. LD contributed to the collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing, data analysis, and interpretation. LOO contributed to the collection and assembly of data. JJ, OD, and AM contributed to the data analysis. AMA contributed to the collection and assembly of data. EDT contributed to the conception and design, data analysis, and interpretation. MGF contributed to the conception and design, collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing, data analysis, and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Gutiérrez-Fernández.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The procedure was carried out at our Cerebrovascular and Neuroscience Research Laboratory, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. All experiments were designed to minimize animal suffering of animals in compliance and approved by our medical school’s Ethical Committee for the Care and Use of Animals in Research (Ref. PROEX 249/15) according to the Spanish (RD 1201/2005 and RD53/2013) and European Union (EU) (86/609/CEE, 2003/65/CE, 2010/63/EU) rules.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Immunohistochemistry study Delimitation of the perilesional tissue with microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) labeling by immunohistochemistry. (TIF 1038 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gómez-de Frutos, M.C., Laso-García, F., Diekhorst, L. et al. Intravenous delivery of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves brain repair in hyperglycemic stroke rats. Stem Cell Res Ther 10, 212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1322-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1322-x

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512