Skip to main content

Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatic diseases


Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are pluripotent stem cells derived from mesoderm during early development that are characterized by high self-renewal ability and multidirectional differentiation potential. These cells are present various tissues in the human body and can be cultured in vitro. Under specific conditions, MSCs can differentiate into osteoblasts, neuron-like cells, adipocytes and muscle cells and so on, therefore, have a great application value in cell replacement therapy and tissue repair. In recent years, the application of MSCs in rheumatic diseases has received increasing attention. On the one hand, MSCs have the ability to differentiate into bone and cartilage cells; on the other hand, these stem cells are also involved in immune regulation, resulting in the alleviation of inflammation and anti-fibrotic properties and the promotion of vascular repair, thus bringing new hope for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. This article reviews the clinical progress in MSC application for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.


Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are derived from the early mesoderm and have a high degree of self-renewal ability and multidirectional differentiation potential [1]. In 1970, Friedenstein et al. discovered that fibroid cells from bone marrow that were cultured and proliferated in vitro could be transplanted under the skin to form bone tissue and rebuild the blood microenvironment [2]. Numerous studies have shown that MSCs can be obtained from a wide variety of sources, including bone marrow (BM), skin, adipose tissue (AD), umbilical cord (UC), and other tissues [3]. Besides their multi-lineage differentiation potential [4,5,6], MSCs also harbor immunosuppressive activities owing to their paracrine effects and interaction with different immune cells [7,8,9,10], and limited immunogenicity with low human leukocyte antigen (HLA) I and no HLA II expression [11]. Studies have shown that BM-MSCs induce low reactivity of T lymphocytes, regulate the expression of inflammatory mediators, significantly reduce the levels of serum tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), produce regulatory T (Treg) cells, and prevent severe bone and cartilage damage [12]. The immunomodulatory effects and tissue repair abilities of MSCs indicate their potential for the treatment of serious refractory autoimmune diseases (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

MSCT in rheumatic diseases

MSCs and rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial hyperplasia and joint damage, leading to clinically significant functional impairment and resulting in decreased quality of life. RA patients have an increased risk of atherosclerosis, which leads to cardiovascular problems—a serious threat to human health and life [13]. Significant progress has been made over the last decade to develop targeted therapies for RA. Conventional drugs for RA include anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (synthetic DMARDs), such as methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and leflunomide. In recent years, treatment options for RA have increased, and biological DMARDs, such as anti-TNF-α blocker, anakinra, abatacept, and rituximab, often in combination with MTX, have been shown to be highly effective [14]. However, these therapies are still limited by low efficacy in some patients and serious complications, including infections and malignancies. Therefore, there is a need to identify new treatment options for RA. MSCs have been shown to regulate their local environment, activate endogenous progenitors through cell–cell interactions and the secretion of various factors, and play a role in tissue damage repair. MSCs can also produce a variety of growth factors and cytokines, such as transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and chemokines (such as MCP-1), which play an important role in tissue repair and remodeling [15, 16]. These characteristics make MSCs an ideal therapeutic agent for treating RA.

Sun et al. [14] reported that intravenous infusions of 1 × 106 MSCs per kg of body weight into four refractory RA patients failed to induce remission; however, no serious adverse events were observed, and authors hypothesized that the relatively low doses of infused MSCs may have been one of the reasons for the lack of success. In the study by Ghoryani et al., autologous BM-MSCs were used to treat nine refractory RA patients [17]. All patients were administered a single intravenous injection of autologous BM-MSCs (1 × 106 cells/kg). After MSCT, 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), visual analog scale (VAS), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values were significantly reduced, but no adverse events were observed. These findings indicate that autologous BM-MSCs can alleviate the severity and activity of refractory RA.

Wang et al. [18] demonstrated that the intravenous infusion of UC-MSCs (1 × 107 cells per kg of body weight) resulted in positive outcomes in 17 RA patients: all patients had significant improvements in their diet, sleep, physical strength, and fatigue after the infusion, while the routine blood tests of liver and kidney function showed that serum immunoglobulin, C3, and C4 results did not change significantly, and the disease activity decreased.

In 2013, a randomized controlled trial using intravenous infusion of UC-MSCs (4 × 107 cells) in 172 patients with active RA was reported [19]. A total of 136 patients in the experimental group were regrouped and infused twice with UC-MSCs at intervals of 3, 6, and 8 months. The results showed that experimental groups had higher improvement rates compared to the control group. In another multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled phase Ib/IIa trial [20], 46 patients were randomly divided into three groups based on the intravenous injection of adipose-derived MSCs (1, 2, 4 × 106 cells/kg) on days 1, 5, and 18. A total of 141 adverse events were reported, of which 133 were mild or moderate, and there were no malignant tumors, thromboembolic events, or deaths. The clinical benefits to RA patients who were administered MSCs appeared to diminish or fluctuate after 3 months, suggesting the need for a second transplant.

Park et al. [21] reported another clinical phase Ia study that involved nine patients with refractory RA. These nine patients were divided into three groups and received a single intravenous infusion of 2.5 × 107, 5 × 107, and 1 × 108 UC-MSCs. The results showed that all patients had improved symptoms and serology, and there were no serious adverse events; however, the sample size of this study was very small, the follow-up time was short, and there was no placebo group for comparison.

Gowhari et al. [22] demonstrated that MSCT inhibited B cells by reducing the production of B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) and decreasing the expression of their receptors on the surface of B cells. The plasma levels of BAFF and APRIL declined significantly after MSCT, indicating a significant effect of MSC on body fluid response. These findings suggest that BAFF could be a favorable target for further investigation of RA pathogenesis.

In summary, these results indicate that MSCs can safely and effectively treat RA, significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients, improve the quality of life, and prevent disease progression; furthermore, second transplantation can further boost the effect of the first transplant. Therefore, MSCs could become a new choice for the clinical treatment of RA.

MSCs and ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic progressive type of spinal inflammatory arthritis. Clinical manifestations of AS usually emerge during the third decade of life [23, 24]. AS characteristically affects the sacroiliac joints, axial skeleton, entheses (tendon or ligament attachments to bone), as well as extraskeletal sites, such as the bowel [25], eye [26], and skin [27]. Inflammatory processes associated with AS lead to bone erosion, new bone formation, and ankylosis in the spine, resulting in severe pain, reduction of spinal mobility, and stiffness [23]. TGF-β, Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and HLA-G5 are potent immunomodulatory molecules produced by MSCs that suppress the immune system by inhibiting dendritic cell maturation and inducing Treg cell production. Furthermore, MSCs inhibit the proliferation and activity of effector T cells, such as Th1, Th17, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), the cells involved in the pathogenesis of AS. In addition, indolamine (IDO) and PGE2 produced by MSCs induce the switch from the pro-inflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophage phenotype [28,29,30,31]. Therefore, MSC therapy could be part of cell therapy methods to improve the treatment of AS.

Wang et al. [32] demonstrated that the intravenous infusion of allogeneic BM-MSCs is an effective and safe treatment approach for patients with active AS. In a study by Li et al. [33], the intravenous transfusion of UC-MSCs showed beneficial outcomes, including safety and decreased clinical symptoms in patients with AS. However, additional studies investigating the effectiveness of MSCT and the systemic adverse effects of intravenous injections for the treatment of AS are necessary [32,33,34], particularly, since recent studies have been conducted on a smaller number of patients due to the low number of AS cases, especially in Asia [32, 33].

MSCs and systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the appearance of multiple autoantibodies, including antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and multi-system involvement. It has been shown that genetic susceptibility and external factors, such as drugs, ultraviolet light, infection, and stress, are involved in the pathogenesis of SLE [35]. Regardless of the inducing factors, the mechanism of SLE involves the activation of B cells, production of autoantibodies, and formation of immune complexes [36].

Studies have shown that autologous MSCs do not improve SLE symptoms [37]. However, in 2010, Sun et al. [38] treated 16 active SLE patients with a single intravenous injection of 1 × 106 /kg.

UC-MSCs and demonstrated a significant improvement in serum biological indicators and renal function. Subsequently, Sun et al. [39] performed a phase II clinical study with a single intravenous dose of 1 × 106/kg allogeneic BM- or UC-MSCs in 87 patients with refractory SLE and reported that the complete remission rate at the 4-year follow-up was 50%, while the overall survival rate was 94%. These results indicated that MSCT clinically improved organ dysfunction in patients with refractory SLE and had good clinical safety, since all observed adverse events were not unrelated to the therapy. In another study [40], 40 SLE patients from four clinical centers were transplanted twice with UC-MSCs (1 × 106 cells/kg, injected one week apart). All patients tolerated the treatment well, and no transplant-related adverse events were reported; however, seven patients relapsed 6 months after transplantation, suggesting the need for a second transplantation to prevent recurrence. Similar results were reported by Yang et al. [41], showing that the MSCs dose was positively correlated with efficacy in their study.

To observe possible adverse events and to evaluate long-term safety, nine SLE patients were infused twice with BM-MSCs (1 × 106 cells/kg, one week apart) and followed up for 6 years [42]. No other adverse events, such as palpitation, headache, nausea, or vomiting, were observed. Furthermore, during the 6-year follow-up, the serum tumor markers AFP, CEA, CA125, and CA199 did not increase before and after the transplantation. In another long-term retrospective study, 178 SLE patients were injected intravenously with 1 × 106 cells/kg UC-MSCs [43]. During the follow-up process, 18 patients developed hyperacute adverse events, 15 patients developed herpes zoster, two patients developed cancer, and 14 patients died; however, these events were considered to be unrelated to transplantation.

There is a general consensus that 60% of lupus patients will develop clinically relevant nephritis at some time during the course of their illness, and lupus nephritis (LN) is a major cause of mortality among lupus patients [44]. In an open-label single-center clinical trial, 81 patients with active and refractory LN were administered a single dose of 1 × 106/kg MSCs [45]. The results of this trial demonstrated that the overall survival rate during the 12-month follow-up period was 95% (77/81). LN activity, as assessed using the BILAG score, decreased significantly by the 12-month follow-up. Total disease activity, as assessed using the SLEDAI score, improved significantly after allogeneic MSCT, while no transplantation-related adverse events were observed. These results indicated that allogeneic MSCT resulted in renal remission in active LN patients by the 12-month follow-up, confirming it as a potential therapy for refractory LN.

It was previously reported that both frequency and function of Treg cells are decreased in patients with active SLE [46]; however, both could be restored by corticosteroid treatment that induced disease remission [47], suggesting a role for Treg cells in the pathogenesis of human SLE. It has been shown that the transcription factor FoxP3 acts as a key molecule in Treg development and function and is, therefore, widely used as a nuclear marker for these cells [48]. Sun et al. observed that UC-MSCT markedly upregulated the percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ Treg cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells three months after transplantation [38]. In addition, the restoration of Treg cells was associated with a concomitant increase in the expression of TGF-β, the cytokine that plays important roles in Treg cell activation and function [49]. The upregulation of Treg cell pathway could be one of the mechanisms underlying the UC-MSCT.

It has also been reported that MSCT combined with immunosuppressive therapy significantly improves the disease status. Furthermore, its efficacy is dose-dependent and repeated injections can delay the progression of the disease and reduce its recurrence; however, to establish the appropriate dosage and multiple infusion intervals, large-scale experiments need to be performed.

MSCs and Sjogren's syndrome

Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocyte infiltration into exocrine glands, such as the lacrimal glands and salivary glands. The clinical manifestations of SS are complex, and the most common symptoms include dry mouth and eyes, which are often accompanied by organ damage [50]. Some SS patients develop malignant lymphoma [51]. Since MSCs possess high proliferation, immune regulation, and multidirectional differentiation capabilities, these cells can inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of various immune cells, secretion of inflammatory factors, and production of antibodies, while promoting the repair of damaged tissues. Therefore, MSC administration has been utilized as a new therapy to treat SS.

In a study by Xu et al., 24 SS patients (with 11 cases of salivary gland damage and 13 cases of multiple organ involvement) were intravenously injected UC-MSCs [52]. The results of that study demonstrated that SS symptoms were significantly reduced by MSCT, the Sjogren's syndrome Disease Activity Index (SSDAI) and VAS were improved, the secretion from salivary glands increased, while no related side effects were observed. This study confirmed that the therapeutic effects of MSCs were due to their immunoregulatory activities, such as regulation of CD4+ T cells, promotion of Treg and Th2 development, and inhibition of Th17 and Tfh inflammatory responses. Furthermore, the author also demonstrated that the stromal cell-derived factor-1/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (SDF-1/CXCR4) axis plays an important role in improving the function of salivary glands. Several studies have shown that MSCs inhibit the proliferation of CD4+ T cells in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice [53], inhibit Th17 cell differentiation [54], reduce IL-17A expression, and improve the secretory function of salivary and lacrimal glands in NOD mice. Experimental results have indicated that the defective immune function of BM-MSCs in SS patients may be responsible for the occurrence of SS [52].

In summary, UC-MSCT can significantly increase saliva flow rate, improve clinical symptoms, and inhibit inflammation. Therefore, allogeneic MSCT could be potentially used as a new, effective, and safe treatment method.

MSCs and polymyositis/dermatomyositis

Polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) is an autoimmune disease characterized by weakness of proximal skeletal muscles and obvious skin manifestations, and is known to affect multiple organs, such as muscles, lungs, and kidneys [55]. Currently, the etiology is not known. Several studies have suggested that T helper (Th) cells are involved in the pathogenesis of PM/DM, since Th cell-related cellular dysfunction plays an important role in the occurrence and development of PM or DM [56]. Therefore, MSCT could provide a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of PM and DM. Several studies have demonstrated that this approach has promising clinical outcomes.

In a long-term retrospective study by Liang et al. [43], 32 PM and DM patients were injected intravenously with 1 × 106/kg MSCs. The results of the 9-year follow-up study demonstrated that the symptoms and serological indicators of patients improved, showing the effectiveness and safety of MSCT in PM and DM, while 11 patients died due to reasons not related to transplantation.

In another study by Lai et al., 81 patients with PM/DM were randomly divided into two groups: 44 patients in the control group were individually treated with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants for 6 months, while 37 patients in the transplantation group were injected intravenously with 3.5–5.2 × 107 UC-MSCs [56]. The results of that study showed that the creatine kinase values in both groups were significantly decreased; however, the transplantation group had better results than the control group at several time points, and the lung function was significantly improved in the transplantation group. One patient died after transplantation and no transplantation-related complications occurred. Wang et al. [57] reported similar results, showing the efficacy and safety of MSCT for the treatment of PM/DM. Therefore, glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy combined with UC-MSCT is a safe and effective option to treat PM or DM.

Lai et al. observed that after UC-MSCT, the levels of IFN-γ increased, while those of interleukin 4 significantly decreased. It was proposed that Th1 and related secreted pro-inflammatory factors were downregulated in response to UC-MSCT. The increase in IL-4 levels indicated the upregulation of Th2 cells, suggesting that UC-MSCs could be involved in the regulation of Th cell balance, resulting in the alleviation of clinical symptoms in patients with PM/DM [56].

Currently, there are only a few studies investigating PM/DM, and large-scale and randomized clinical studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of MSCT in PM/DM patients, including the risks of tumors and infections, as well as the optimal transplantation dose and schedule (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatic diseases

MSCs and systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by increased synthesis and deposition of extra-cellular matrix in skin and various internal organs. The abnormal deposition of collagen in the skin and other organs leads to multiple organ dysfunction, and the prognosis of individuals with lung, heart, or kidney involvement is poor [58]. Fibrosis is not reversible, and there is no safe and effective treatment for SSc [59]. MSCs have the potential to differentiate into bone or muscle cells, as well as into endothelial cells. Compared with healthy controls, MSCs from SSc patients exhibit abnormal functional activities, such as increased expression of TGF-βand vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and impairment of endothelial cell differentiation, which may play critical roles during the development of fibrosis in SSc [60, 61]. Based on these findings, allogeneic MSCT appears a promising therapy for SSc.

In a long-term retrospective study by Liang et al. [43], 39 patients with SSc were injected intravenously with 1 × 106/kg MSCs. The 9-year follow-up results showed that the skin symptoms and serological indicators of all patients improved, demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of MSCT in the treatment of SSc, while the death of six patients was not related to transplantation.

In a 2011 study by Keyszer et al. [62], five patients with severe SSc were administered the intravenous injections of 0.2–1.8 × 106/kg MSCs. Out of these five patients, three patients had lung involvement (one patient had pulmonary fibrosis), four patients had skin ulcers, and two patients had myositis. Within 6 months, the skin symptoms of four patients improved and limb necrosis was significantly alleviated in three patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the cases, no definite conclusions could be drawn regarding the efficacy of BM-MSCT. However, based on these results, BM-MSCT appears to be safe for SSc patients, and the healing of skin ulcers was the most significant therapeutic effect of this therapy.

In another study, two patients received plasma exchange and rituximab treatment [63], as well as allogeneic UC-MSCs as part of the comprehensive treatment of patients with scleroderma. In an open study [64], 14 patients with SSc were treated with a single injection of BM-MSCs combined with plasma exchange. The results of this study showed that the MRSS decreased, while the anti-Scl70 antibody titer increased, and lung parameters were also improved.

Conclusions and outlook

Bone marrow and umbilical cord are convenient sources of stem cells, and MSCs can be easily derived from these tissues. For MSCT, intravenous injections are commonly used and the dosage generally varies between 1 × 106 cells/kg and 1 × 108 cells/kg. Based on the studies described in this review, the repeated injections of MSCT appear to be more effective than a single administration. Furthermore, the effectiveness of MSCT in rheumatic diseases has been widely confirmed. In terms of safety, infections and cancer are two important and significant issues related to MSCT. Long-term follow-up studies showed that serum tumor markers did not increase before and 6 years after MSCT [42]; however, there are no reports investigating the correlation between MSCT and the incidence of infection and cancer. The regulatory mechanism of MSCT for different autoimmune diseases has not yet been fully elucidated, and there is still a lack of large-scale and randomized multicenter clinical studies on MSCT. Clinical treatment with MSCs requires that the safety and effectiveness of pharmaceutical preparations, as well as the quality and scientific validity of relevant clinical research and trial programs, are first guaranteed. The field of stem cell therapy expects high-quality clinical evidence to support the application of stem cell transplantation. Clinical research can also identify future development directions for basic stem cell research [65]. However, as a cell therapy, MSCT may cause capillary bed blockage, ectopic osteogenesis, chondrogenesis, tumor and other risks, which limits its clinical application to a certain extent. It is believed that with the gradual improvement of our understanding of the biological properties and clinical applications of MSCs, MSCT will have a wider application. Further research on MSCT will provide new perspectives and ideas for its use in the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.



Mesenchymal stem cells


Mesenchymal stem cells transplantation


Synovial membrane


Bone marrow


Adipose tissue


Umbilical cord


Synovial membrane mesenchymal stem cells


Bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells


Rheumatoid arthritis


B-cell activating factor


Vascular endothelial growth factor


Ankylosing spondylitis


Systemic lupus erythematosus


Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index


British Isles Lupus Assessment Group


Systemic sclerosis


Sjogren's syndrome


Stromal cell-derived factor-1/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4






  1. 1.

    Yang YJ, Li XL, Xue Y, Zhang CX, Wang Y, Hu X, et al. Bone marrow cells differentiation into organ cells using stem cell therapy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:2899–907.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhyan RK, Latsinik NV, Panasyuk AF, Keiliss-Borok IV. Stromal cells responsible for transferring the microenvironment of the hemopoietic tissues. Cloning in vitro and retransplantation in vivo. Transplantation. 1974;17:331–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Guillot PV, Gotherstrom C, Chan J, Kurata H, Fisk NM. Human first-trimester fetal MSC express pluripotency markers and grow faster and have longer telomeres than adult MSC. Stem Cells. 2007;25:646–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Paul D, Samuel SM, Maulik N. Mesenchymal stem cell: present challenges and prospective cellular cardiomyoplasty approaches for myocardial regeneration. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11:1841–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ju S, Teng GJ, Lu H, Jin J, Zhang Y, Zhang A, et al. In vivo differentiation of magnetically labeled mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocytes for cell therapy to repair damaged liver. Investig Radiol. 2010;45:625–33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. J Am Soc Hematol. 2007;110:3499–506.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sotiropoulou PA, Perez SA, Gritzapis AD, Baxevanis CN, Papamichail M. Interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and natural killer cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:74–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wt T, Jd P, Wm B, Mc E, Ec G. Suppression of allogeneic T-cell proliferation by human marrow stromal cells: implications in transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;75:389–97.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yy O, St D, Ss T. Paracrine effects of mesenchymal stem cells-conditioned medium on microglial cytokines expression and nitric oxide production. NeuroImmunoModulation. 2015;22:233–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Le Blanc K, Mougiakakos D. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:383–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Augello A, Tasso R, Negrini SM, Cancedda R, Pennesi G. Cell therapy using allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells prevents tissue damage in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1175–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Burggraaf B, van Breukelen-van DSD, de Vries MA, Klop B, Liem AH, van de Geijn GM, et al. Effect of a treat-to-target intervention of cardiovascular risk factors on subclinical and clinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:335–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liang J, Li X, Zhang H, Wang D, Feng X, Wang H, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in patients with refractory RA. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31:157–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Maxson S, Lopez EA, Yoo D, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Leroux MA. Concise review: role of mesenchymal stem cells in wound repair. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:142–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pankajakshan D, Agrawal DK. Mesenchymal stem cell paracrine factors in vascular repair and regeneration. J Biomed Technol Res. 2014;1:10–19104.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ghoryani M, Shariati-Sarabi Z, Tavakkol-Afshari J, Ghasemi A, Poursamimi J, Mohammadi M. Amelioration of clinical symptoms of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis following treatment with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a successful clinical trial in Iran. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:1834–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang LM, Zhou JJ, Bai W, Bai B, Li M, Wang HY, et al. Observation on the clinical efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of 17 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Chin J Immunol. 2010;26:659–62 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang L, Wang L, Cong X, Liu G, Zhou J, Bai B, et al. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell therapy for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: safety and efficacy. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:3192–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alvaro-Gracia JM, Jover JA, Garcia-Vicuna R, Carreno L, Alonso A, Marsal S, et al. Intravenous administration of expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (Cx611): results of a multicentre, dose escalation, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ib/IIa clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:196–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Park EH, Lim HS, Lee S, Roh K, Seo KW, Kang KS, et al. Intravenous infusion of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatoid arthritis: a phase IA Clinical Trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7:636–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gowhari SA, Shariati-Sarabi Z, Tavakkol-Afshari J, Ghasemi A, Ghoryani M, Mohammadi M. A significant decrease of BAFF, APRIL, and BAFF receptors following mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Gene. 2020;732:144336.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Landewé R, Dougados M, Mielants H, van der Tempel H, van der Heijde D. Physical function in ankylosing spondylitis is independently determined by both disease activity and radiographic damage of the spine. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:863–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bidad K, Fallahi S, Mahmoudi M, Jamshidi A, Farhadi E, Meysamie A, et al. Evaluation of the Iranian versions of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:3613–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rudwaleit M, Baeten D. Ankylosing spondylitis and bowel disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:451–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stolwijk C, van Tubergen A, Castillo-Ortiz JD, Boonen A. Prevalence of extra-articular manifestations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:65–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dougados M, Etcheto A, Moltó A, Alonso S, Bouvet S, Daurès JP, et al. Clinical presentation of patients suffering from recent onset chronic inflammatory back pain suggestive of spondyloarthritis: the DESIR cohort. Jt Bone Spine. 2015;82:345–51.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Miller EA, Ernst JD. Anti-TNF immunotherapy and tuberculosis reactivation: another mechanism revealed. J Clin Investig. 2009;119:1079–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Baraliakos X, Listing J, Brandt J, Zink A, Alten R, Burmester G, et al. Clinical response to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 3 years of continuous treatment with infliximab. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2005;7:R439–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Paramarta JE, Baeten D. Spondyloarthritis: from unifying concepts to improved treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53:1547–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Braun J, Sieper J. Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis and other spondyloarthritides: established medical treatment, anti-TNF-alpha therapy and other novel approaches. Arthritis Res Therapy. 2002;4:307–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang P, Li Y, Huang L, Yang J, Yang R, Deng W, et al. Effects and safety of allogenic mesenchymal stem cell intravenous infusion in active ankylosing spondylitis patients who failed NSAIDs: a 20-week clinical trial. Cell Transplant. 2014;23:1293–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li A, Tao Y, Kong D, Zhang N, Wang Y, Wang Z, et al. Infusion of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviates symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14:1538–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rs W. Role of stem cells in spondyloarthritis: pathogenesis, treatment and complications. Hum Immunol. 2015;76:781–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lisnevskaia L, Murphy G, Isenberg D. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 2014;384:1878–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Liu Z, Davidson A. Taming lupus—a new understanding of pathogenesis is leading to clinical advances. Nat Med. 2012;18:871–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Carrion F, Nova E, Ruiz C, Diaz F, Inostroza C, Rojo D, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell treatment increased T regulatory cells with no effect on disease activity in two systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2010;19:317–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sun L, Wang D, Liang J, Zhang H, Feng X, Wang H, et al. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in severe and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2467–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang D, Zhang H, Liang J, Li X, Feng X, Wang H, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in severe and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: 4 years of experience. Cell Transplant. 2013;22:2267–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang D, Li J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Chen J, Li X, et al. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in active and refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter clinical study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:R79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yang GX, Pan LP, Chen ZQ, Zhou QY, Wang CX. The dose-effect relationship of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Yunnan Med. 2015;36:579–84 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang D, Niu L, Feng X, Yuan X, Zhao S, Zhang H, et al. Long-term safety of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus: a 6-year follow-up study. Clin Exp Med. 2017;17:333–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liang J, Zhang H, Kong W, Deng W, Wang D, Feng X, et al. Safety analysis in patients with autoimmune disease receiving allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells infusion: a long-term retrospective study. Stem Cell Res Therapy. 2018;9:312.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mm W. Changes in the incidence of end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis, 1982–1995. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3136–40.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gu F, Wang D, Zhang H, Feng X, Gilkeson GS, Shi S, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for lupus nephritis patients refractory to conventional therapy. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:1611–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Valencia X, Yarboro C, Illei G, Lipsky PE. Deficient CD4+CD25high T regulatory cell function in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2007;178:2579–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Azab NA, Bassyouni IH, Emad Y, Abd EG, Hamdy G, Mashahit MA. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (TREG) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients: the possible influence of treatment with corticosteroids. Clin Immunol. 2008;127:151–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bacchetta R, Passerini L, Gambineri E, Dai M, Allan SE, Perroni L, et al. Defective regulatory and effector T cell functions in patients with FOXP3 mutations. J Clin Investig. 2006;116:1713–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Marie JC, Letterio JJ, Gavin M, Rudensky AY. TGF-beta1 maintains suppressor function and Foxp3 expression in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1061–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Mariette X, Criswell LA. Primary Sjögren’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:97.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nocturne G, Pontarini E, Bombardieri M, Mariette X. Lymphomas complicating primary Sjogren’s syndrome: from autoimmunity to lymphoma. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;60(8):3513–21.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xu J, Wang D, Liu D, Fan Z, Zhang H, Liu O, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell treatment alleviates experimental and clinical Sjogren syndrome. Blood. 2012;120:3142–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gong BD, Lu ZH, Jing B, Huang JS, Ruan GF, Tang JP. The effect of mesenchymal stem cells on the miRNA expression profile of activated CD4~+ T cells in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome. Chin J Rheumatol. 2015;19:435–9 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yao G, Qi J, Liang J, Shi B, Chen W, Li W, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation alleviates experimental Sjogren’s syndrome through IFN-beta/IL-27 signaling axis. Theranostics. 2019;9:8253–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Findlay AR, Goyal NA, Mozaffar T. An overview of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Muscle Nerve. 2015;51:638–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lai Q, Yu L, Qiu YR, Chen LT, Huang JQ, Li YM, et al. Umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for the treatment of polymyositis/dermatomyositis: changes in Th cytokines. J Clin Rehabil Tis Eng Res. 2015;19:2186–91 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wang D, Zhang H, Cao M, Tang Y, Liang J, Feng X, et al. Efficacy of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with drug-resistant polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1285–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 Classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:2737–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Johnson SR, Goek ON, Singh-Grewal D, Vlad SC, Feldman BM, Felson DT, et al. Classification criteria in rheumatic diseases: a review of methodologic properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1119–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Vanneaux V, Farge-Bancel D, Lecourt S, Baraut J, Cras A, Jean-Louis F, et al. Expression of transforming growth factor β receptor II in mesenchymal stem cells from systemic sclerosis patients. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001890.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Guiducci S, Manetti M, Romano E, Mazzanti B, Ceccarelli C, Dal Pozzo S, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells from early diffuse systemic sclerosis exhibit a paracrine machinery and stimulate angiogenesis in vitro. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:2011–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Keyszer G, Christopeit M, Fick S, Schendel M, Taute BM, Behre G, et al. Treatment of severe progressive systemic sclerosis with transplantation of mesenchymal stromal cells from allogeneic related donors: report of five cases. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:2540–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wehbe T, Abi SM, Abi CN, Margossian T. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for refractory scleroderma: a report of 2 cases. Stem Cell Investig. 2016;3:48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhang H, Liang J, Tang X, Wang D, Feng X, Wang F, et al. Sustained benefit from combined plasmapheresis and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells transplantation therapy in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:165.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Li YX, Xie L, Lyu WW, Wu ZH, Qian BY. Grasp the quality elements of stem cell non-registered clinical research under COVID-19 epidemic. Chin Med Biotechnol. 2020;15:109–12 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771768, 82001741), the applied basic research project of Shanxi Science and Technology Department (201801D221381).

Author information




YJW and DM performed and wrote the manuscript; BQY, ZWW and RL collected the references and designed the table; XXZ and HLY modified the manuscript; and LYZ designed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liyun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Ma, D., Wu, Z. et al. Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatic diseases. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 567 (2021).

Download citation


  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Rheumatic diseases
  • Clinical application