Skip to main content
Download PDF

Human pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages and macrophage-derived exosomes: therapeutic potential in pulmonary fibrosis

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 13, Article number: 433 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a fatal chronic disease characterized by accumulation of extracellular matrix and thickening of the alveolar wall, ultimately leading to respiratory failure. PF is thought to be initiated by the dysfunction and aberrant activation of a variety of cell types in the lung. In particular, several studies have demonstrated that macrophages play a pivotal role in the development and progression of PF through secretion of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines, suggesting that they could be an alternative therapeutic source as well as therapeutic target for PF. In this review, we describe the characteristics, functions, and origins of subsets of macrophages involved in PF and summarize current data on the generation and therapeutic application of macrophages derived from pluripotent stem cells for the treatment of fibrotic diseases. Additionally, we discuss the use of macrophage-derived exosomes to repair fibrotic lung tissue.

Introduction

Macrophages are immune cells that originate from progenitors in the bone marrow (BM) that circulate in the peripheral blood and migrate into different tissues [1,2,3,4]. Macrophages are the foremost controllers of both innate and acquired immunity and are activated by different endogenous and exogenous signals to mediate immune homeostasis [5]. Macrophages are major mediators of inflammation, tissue repair, and immune function due to their ability to secrete an array of soluble cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Specialized macrophages in different tissues are referred to by different names: liver macrophages that promote tissue remodeling and immune responses are called Kupffer cells, macrophages that maintain the immunity of the brain by eliminating dead neurons are referred to as neuronal macrophages or microglia, macrophages that eliminate dysfunctional or old red blood cells (RBCs) are called splenic macrophages, while macrophages that phagocytose dead cells or bacteria in lung tissue are referred to as lung macrophages [6].

Macrophages are abundant in the lung microenvironment and comprise a heterogeneous population of cells with diverse functions and phenotypic plasticity dependent on the inflammatory signals they encounter in the lung microenvironment. Lung macrophages are important sentinels that are critical to pulmonary host defenses. Two macrophage populations reside within lungs: alveolar macrophages (AMs) and interstitial macrophages (IMs), which differ in the expression of surface markers as well as their localization and functional phenotype [7, 8]. AMs are primary effector cells that possess both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties and express low levels of CD11b and high CD11c levels and colonize the airway space in lungs. By contrast, high CD11b- and CD11c-expressing IMs reside in the lung parenchyma and maintaining immune homeostasis in the respiratory tract [9]. Inflammatory responses of macrophages are associated with the development of acute and chronic pulmonary pathologies including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [10, 11]. In this review, we describe the characteristics, functions, and origins of subsets of macrophages and discuss the importance and regulation of macrophage polarization in the development of IPF. Additionally, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the therapeutic use of pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages to treat fibrotic diseases and macrophage-derived exosomes to repair fibrotic lung tissue.

Role of macrophages in lung fibrosis

IPF

IPF is the most common lung disease and is characterized by the progressive deposition of collagen and extracellular matrix, resulting in damaged and scarred lung tissue. The scarring associated with IPF can lead to impaired gas exchange, breathlessness, decreased static lung compliance, and respiratory failure [12,13,14]. A number of genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to the development of IPF [15]. Non-genetic factors such as cigarette smoking, dust exposure, and infection are believed to increase the risk of IPF [16, 17]. Genetic studies in familial and sporadic IPF patients have revealed an association between IPF susceptibility and telomerase-related genes [18], surfactant-associated genes [19, 20], mucin 5B gene, toll interacting protein (TOLLIP), and the signal peptide peptidase like 2C (SPPL2C) [21, 22]. Additionally, matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7) are found in the peripheral blood of individuals with IPF and are highly overexpressed in lung fibrosis and reflect disease progression [23]. The activation of multiple wound-healing pathways is also a characteristic of IPF progression. Necrosis and/or apoptosis of alveolar epithelial cells is a consistent finding in patients with lung fibrosis [24,25,26]. Macrophages are involved in the wound-healing response in the lung and subsequent IPF development. The involvement of macrophages in IPF is another aspect of lung disease that needs evaluation to understand the role played by these inflammatory cells in the development of IPF.

Macrophages in IPF

Although there is a continuum of macrophage polarization beyond the simplified, discrete, in vitro-based classification system, pulmonary macrophages can also be broadly classified into classically activated macrophages (M1 macrophages) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2 macrophages) depending on their functional phenotypes and biological activities [27]. M1 macrophages are induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), IFN-γ, and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and produce mediators aimed at eliminating foreign materials and debris. The transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF-5) promotes the M1 phenotype during early inflammatory stages to protect against intracellular pathogens by inducing nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1b, IL-12b, IL-23, and TNF [28,29,30]. However, sustained inflammatory responses can trigger fibrotic responses in the lung. By contrast, M2 macrophages, which are induced by IL-4, IL-13, TGF-b, and IL-10 [31], are known to release mediators that downregulate the inflammatory response and promote the resolution of injury and tissue repair. M1 and M2 macrophages have distinct roles in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis due to their different cytokine expression profiles [10]. Usually, after alveolar epithelial injury, M1 macrophages heal the wound while M2 macrophages are responsible for completing the healing processes or inflammatory responses in the lung [10]. The reaction to unrelenting lung injury is alteration of wound healing process, which ultimately can result in IPF. Lung fibrosis progression has not been successfully halted by previous therapies due to a lack of knowledge of the exact mechanisms by which the balance between M1/M2 macrophage phenotype can be manipulated. Hence, future studies need to focus on the interactions between macrophages and fibroblasts.

Macrophages derived from pluripotent stem cells

Methods to derive macrophages from monocytes and TRMs

Several advancements have led to the development of different methods to derive generic macrophages, but there are very few methods available for the functional analysis of human M0s. The earliest method for macrophage generation involved direct isolation of tissue resident macrophages (TRMs) from relevant tissues [32,33,34,35]; however, insufficient yield and poor cell quality are major limitations of this method [36]. The use of immortalized cell lines from hemato-oncological patients such as THP-1 or U937 cells is a cheap and robust way to derive resting macrophages (M0s). However, the genetics of these malignant cells limits the application of this approach [37, 38]. Another method widely used for the generation of M0s exploits CD14 + monocytes derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Monocytes are induced by growth factors or cytokines (mainly M-CSF) to generate M0s [39, 40]. An advantage of this method is the ready availability of human peripheral blood samples and the high quantity of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) obtained from individual donors. However, MDMs cannot be used to model TRMs and are unable to proliferate and be maintained under culture conditions for long periods of time [4, 7, 41,42,43,44].

Methods to derive macrophages from PSCs

Macrophages have also been derived from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) such as embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced human pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Most of the methods used follow the common principle of stepwise differentiation of PSCs into M0s through the formation of mesoderm, hemogenic endothelium (HE), hematopoietic progenitors, and monocytic cells, mimicking embryonic hematopoiesis [45,46,47,48]. Generation of M0s from PSCs has several advantages over previously established human M0 models.

This approach can be used to generate ideal TRM models compared with MDMs due to the easy accessibility and scalability of PSCs. Several protocols have been established to differentiate PSCs into M0s (iMphs), all of which comprise four major stages: (1) mesoderm commitment and HE specification (M/HEstage); (2) endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition and the generation of hematopoietic progenitors (HP stage); (3) myeloid specification and the formation of monocyte-like cells (MY stage); and (4) terminal differentiation of iMphs (MF stage). There are several protocols that differ in the methods used to culture and differentiate PSCs that are outlined below. In 2D-OP9 protocols, PSCs are co-cultured with stromal cells to differentiate into M0s. S17, OP9, C166, UG26, and AM20.1B4 are different types of stromal cells that secrete factors that promote the proliferation of hematopoietic cells [49]. OP9 was successfully used for iMph differentiation due to its ability to prevent early monocyte/M0s bias and differentiation into different types of hematopoietic lineages. Given that OP9 cells are derived from the bone marrow cells of osteopetrosis mice, the use of xenogeneic cells limits its therapeutic applications. Stromal cell-independent protocols were developed later and there are three different protocols based on the induction of mesoderm commitment and HE specification (M/HE). Embryoid body (EB)–based three-dimensional (3D) spontaneous protocols (EB-S) generate EBs by culturing PSCs under low-adherent conditions while M/HE differentiation is achieved without the addition of exogenous factors [50,51,52,53]. Further, HP and MY differentiation are induced simultaneously by treatment with a combination of cytokines (IL-3 and M-CSF). EB-based 3D factor-assisted protocols (EB-F) involve exposure of EBs to several exogenous factors such as BMP4, SCF, and VEGF to achieve M/HE specification [48, 51]. HP and MY differentiation are induced simultaneously with IL-3 and M-CSF. Some EB-F protocols sequentially differentiate the HP stage into the MY stage. HP differentiation is achieved by treating cells with hematopoietic factors without M-CSF followed by conditional MY differentiation using hematopoietic factors along with M-CSF. EB-independent two-dimensional (2D) factor-assisted protocols (2D-F) rely on culturing PSCs on matrix-coated plates (matrigel) with several external factors (BMP-4, VEGF, SCF, FGF2, CHIR99021, and activin A) for M/HE specification [54,55,56,57], followed by sequential differentiation into HP and MY stages. Finally, all protocols involve terminal differentiation from monocyte-like cells to iMphs by cultivating cells in the presence of M-CSF. The schematic representation for the protocols and the detailed information of the exogenous factors supplemented along with the culture medium are discussed in Fig. 1 and Table 1, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation for the generation of iMphs from PSCs using different protocols. In all the protocols, the differentiation of PSCs into iMphs goes through four main stages as described. Embryoid Body-Spontaneous (EB-S) Step-1, PSCs culturing- PSCs are cultured and expanded on MEFs. Stage 1, M/HE stage- The mesoderm or hemogenic endothelium (M/HE) is induced through the EB formation in ultra-low adhesive (ULA) culture dishes. Stage 2 and Stage 3, HP and MY stages, the EBs formed in stage 1 are transferred to matrix-coated plates and cultured in medium supplemented with IL-3 and M-CSF under normoxia conditions. The floating monocyte-like cells (iMCs) are collected and transferred to new culture plates for their terminal differentiation. Stage 4, MF terminal differentiation- The cells collected from stage 3 are cultured using RPMI medium supplemented with M-CSF for their terminal differentiation into macrophages-derived from iPSCs (iMphs). Embryoid Body-Factors (EB-F) HP + MY: Step-1, PSCs culturing- PSCs are cultured and expanded on matrix-coated culture plates. Stage 1, M/HE stage- The mesoderm/HE specification in EBs is directed by externally supplied factors under normoxia condition. Stage 2 and Stage 3, HP and MY stages, the EBs from stage 1 are transferred to new plates and cultured in medium supplemented with IL-3 and M-CSF. Similar to EB-S protocol, the floating cells are collected and transferred to new culture plates for their terminal differentiation. Stage 4, MF terminal differentiation- The cells collected from stage 3 are cultured using RPMI medium supplemented with M-CSF for their terminal differentiation into iMphs. Embryoid Body-Factors (EB-F) HP → MY Step-1, PSCs culturing- PSCs are depleted from the MEFs before subjecting to differentiation. Stage 1, M/HE stage- The mesoderm/HE specification in EBs is directed by combination of exogenous factors under normoxia or hypoxia conditions. Stage 2, HP stage- The EBs obtained from stage 1 are transferred to either ULA or matrix-coated plates and cultured in the presence of specific exogenous factors to induce HP stage. Stage 3, MY stage- In the MY stage, the composition of exogenous factors is modified for the generation of iMCs. Stage 4, Stage 4, MF terminal differentiation- The floating iMCs cells are collected from stage 3 and cultured with M-CSF for their terminal differentiation into iMphs. Embryoid Body-independent 2D-Factors Step-1, PSCs culturing- PSCs are cultured on Matrigel-coated plates. Stage 1, M/HE stage- The M/HE is induced by culturing cells in M/HE-specific factors on matrigel coated plates under normoxia or hypoxia condition. Stage 2, HP stage- The HP specification is achieved in the presence of HP-specific factors. Stage 3, MY stage- For MY differentiation, the cells are either transferred to ULA plates or matrigel-coated plates and cultured under a set of exogenous factors for further differentiation into iMCs. Stage 4, MF terminal differentiation-The floating iMCs cells are collected from stage 3 and cultured with M-CSF for their terminal differentiation into iMphs

Full size image
Table 1 Culture medium and exogenous factors supplied during iPSCs differentiation into iMphs
Full size table

PSC-derived macrophages as disease models

Several studies have identified the potential of using PSC-derived macrophages in disease modelling of several diseases. iMph-based disease models are generated mainly through two major approaches. In the first approach, iMphs are generated using patient-derived iPSCs. This method has been used to model Gaucher disease, familial Mediterranean fever, Alzheimer disease, Tangier disease, chronic granulomatous disease (CGD), and Parkinson’s disease [58,59,60,61,62]. In the second approach, iMphs are generated using healthy donors-derived iPSCs mutated to carry the disease-associated mutations. This method has been successfully used to model CGD [63] and very-early onset bowel disease (VEOBD) [64, 65].

PSC-derived macrophages have also been used as a standard model to study macrophage-pathogen interactions and determine the role of human genetics in disease outcomes. Two closely related mosquito-transmitted flaviviruses (Zika virus and Dengue virus) have been studied using iMphs [66]. PSC-derived macrophages are highly relevant to study infectious agents that require macrophages as a source of persistence and replication, such as Chlamydia [67], Salmonella [68], and HIV [69]. These studies suggest that M0s models can therefore be utilized to determine the impact of infectious agents on disease pathogenesis and persistence.

Recent emergence of three-dimensional (3D) model systems, such as organoids and spheroids, and hydrogel systems have advanced our understanding of the tissue microenvironment better than two-dimensional (2D) models. The intact 3D structure allows replication of cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions to study regenerative medicine, disease modelling, and drug development in a variety of diseases. In this review, we outline the current 3D models to elucidate cellular and molecular cues in IPF and drug discovery.

3D models of IPF and drug discovery

Despite significant research, the development of effective therapies for IPF faces challenges due to the lack of in vitro models to mimic disease pathophysiology. Lung 3D cultures including precision cut lung slices (PCLS), hydrogels, and lung organoids have emerged as valuable tools for drug discovery and testing in a variety of pulmonary diseases including IPF[70,71,72,73]. PCLS maintain the native lung environment and is a relevant in vitro model to study lung fibrosis and drug testing in a diseased tissue condition [74]. Hydrogels are water-swollen cross-linked networks of polymers and offer another in vitro model to study IPF. Hydrogels can be customized to model normal or diseased microenvironments by altering biomaterials and crosslinking mechanisms [73]. The generation of lung organoids using hPSCs is a recent method to study the development of fibrosis and to screen novel drugs. hPSC-derived lung organoid models retain patient gene mutations and allow an improved understanding of molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Strikoudis et al. demonstrate the importance of hPSC-derived lung organoids to model fibrotic lung disease wherein they identified the therapeutic potential of interleukin-11 (IL-11) in lung fibrosis [75]. Korogi et al. also provide insight into the potential role of hiPSC-derived lung organoids in disease modelling [76]. Cystic fibrosis patient-specific iPSC-derived lung epithelial cells have been used as an in vitro model to test novel small-molecule compounds called cystic fibrosis correctors [77]. The therapeutic value of NP-011 in assessing the anti-fibrotic potential of milk fat globule-EGF factor 8 (MFG-E8) protein has been demonstrated by hPSC-derived multicellular alveolar organoids containing functional alveolar epithelial and mesenchymal cells as an in vitro model for pulmonary fibrosis [70]. hPSC-based alveolar organoids also served as a relevant in vitro model to evaluate the toxic effect of particulate matter (PM2.5) on fetal alveolar development and acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus clade 2 (SARS-CoV-2) susceptibility [78].

A major drawback of these organoids is lack of immune cell components, such as macrophages, which limits the recapitulation of in vivo cellular physiology to model IPF and design subsequent drug screening approaches. Multicellular alveolar organoids with macrophages (Mac-AOs) exhibit phenotypic and functional resemblance to human macrophages and can demonstrate critical pulmonary fibrosis pathological features such as inflammation, collagen accumulation.

Macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles

Macrophages are blood immune cells that reside in all tissues and constitute the first line of defense against invading pathogens. Any abnormality in macrophage responses may result in uncontrolled inflammation and immune disorders, which are implicated in many diseases including renal inflammation and fibrosis [79]. Activated macrophages communicate with target cells via direct cell-to-cell contact and/or release of cytokines and extracellular vesicles (EVs) to exert their immunomodulatory functions. EVs are membrane-enclosed vesicles that can be classified as large oncosomes (LOs, ~ 1–10 μm), apoptotic bodies (ABs, ~ 1–5 μm), microvesicles (MVs, ~ 200–1000 nm), exosomes (Exos, ~ 30–200 nm), or exomeres (< 50 nm) on the basis of their size [80]. EVs exhibit similar properties to their parent cells and function as vital carriers to transfer cargo such as proteins, nucleic acids, and metabolites from parent cells to recipient cells. The role of macrophage-derived EVs, especially exosomes, has been widely investigated in different diseases to determine the roles played by EVs in disease progression. In this review, we primarily focus on the roles of macrophage-derived exosomes in disease and therapy (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A representative scheme for macrophage generation from iPSCs and their current and prospective applications in genomic analysis of lung disorders, lung disease modelling, drug screening specific to lung disorders and macrophage-based cell therapeutics to lung disorders

Full size image

Exosomes are cell-secreted, nanosized, bi-lipid vesicles continuously secreted from various types of cells including alveolar epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells [81]. Exosomes contribute to biological processes by transporting various bioactive molecules, such as nucleic acids (including miRNAs), proteins, and lipids [82,83,84,85,86,87]. Exosomes regulate various inflammatory and angiogenic pathways by transferring miRNAs from a donor to a recipient cell [83, 88,89,90]. Exosomes are considered to promote the polarization of macrophages [91, 92]. A large proportion of microvesicles in the blood are derived from macrophage-derived exosomes [93]. Exosomal-enclosed miRNAs have been shown to play crucial roles in inflammation, tissue repair, and fibrogenesis [94]. MicroRNAs are small non-coding single-stranded RNAs containing 18–25 nucleotides that are widely distributed in various organisms from viruses to humans [95] To date, more than 1000 human miRNAs have been found. These molecules act as regulators of gene expression by inhibiting protein translation, and play key roles in signal transduction, tissue and organ development, and other biological processes [96, 97]. Previous studies have demonstrated that exosomes play a pivotal role in various pulmonary diseases such as IPF, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma [98,99,100].

COPD

COPD is a chronic inflammatory lung disease caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases and is characterized by obstructive airflow resulting in breathing abnormalities. The symptoms of COPD are further exacerbated by several environmental factors such as smoking. Bronchial epithelial cells (BECs), the primary cells in contact with external stimuli such as cigarette smoke, play a critical role in airway homeostasis and are considered to be major EVs producer in the lung. Elevated levels of exosomes have been found to correlate with C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (sTNFR1), and interleukin (IL)-6 levels; all these molecules are plasma biomarkers of systemic inflammation with a potential pathophysiological role in COPD [101]. Exosomes secreted in COPD patients contain miRNAs (miR-210) that promote inflammation and alter the gene expression of target cells. Moreover, miRNAs from plasma-derived vesicles can serve as biomarkers in smokers and COPD patients [102].

Asthma

Asthma is a common lung disease that affects both children and adults and that causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, and chest tightness [103]. Cells such as bronchial epithelial cells, dendritic cells, eosinophils, mast cells, and T-cells release cytokines in this disease [104,105,106]. Eosinophil-derived exosomes activate structural lung cells and contribute to the pathogenies of asthma [107]. Levels of serum exosomes containing miRNA-125b have been found to be higher in patients with asthma and may serve as a marker of asthma severity [108]. Studies in mice have revealed a protective role for M2 macrophage-derived exosomes. Under asthmatic conditions induced by ovalbumin, miR-370 levels were found to be reduced in M2 macrophage-derived exosomes and were found to be correlated with improved OVA-induced lung fibrosis and inflammatory responses [91].

IPF

IPF is a chronic, progressive, and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia characterized by the replacement of healthy tissue by altered extracellular matrix and an impaired alveolar structure. Therapy for IPF focuses mainly on prolonging the life expectancy of patients by slowing down disease progression [109, 110]. For this reason, new pharmacological treatments and biomarkers to ensure better outcomes and diagnose patients early are needed. A recent study investigated the quantity of microRNAs in serum extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, of mice with bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, and reported significant up-regulation of serum EV miR-21e5p in both the acute and chronic fibrotic phases. Furthermore, as miR-21e5p promotes TGF-b signaling, which is a key signaling pathway in IPF, miR-21e5p was suggested to be a potential biomarker of IPF [111]. EVs were also found to promote the proliferation and activation of fibroblasts in lungs and participate in the pathogenesis of IPF by mediating WNT5A signaling [112]. In another study, two types of miRNAs were found to be associated with IPF: (1) sputum macrophages were found to contain elevated levels of exosomal miR-142-3p in IPF while (2) macrophage-derived exosomes exerted a protective effect against pulmonary fibrosis progression via the delivery of antifibrotic miR-142-3p [83].

Therapeutic potential of exosomes in chronic respiratory diseases

The therapeutic potential of exosomes extends to many diseases, including those of the lung, liver, kidney, and heart. Exosomes have been widely studied by several pharmaceutical companies to create products with therapeutic applications. MSC-derived exosomes developed by Aegle Therapeutics are under phase 1/2 clinical trials for dermatological disorders (NCT04173650). Another company, Carmine Therapeutics, derived EVs from RBCs to develop next-generation gene therapies to overcome the limitations of existing viral-based therapies such as low transgene capacity, immunogenicity, and other manufacturing challenges.

Exosome-based therapy is currently also being pursued in lung diseases such as IPF, COPD, acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). MSC-derived exosomes have been used to treat ARDS [113] and protect against cigarette smoke-induced damage [114]. Intranasal delivery of exosomes derived from human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs) targets inflammatory and regenerative cascades of IPF to reverse lung fibrosis and enhance endogenous lung repair [115]. Similarly, inhalation of lung spheroid cell-secretomes (LSC-Sec) and exosomes (LSC-Exo) has been shown to be beneficial in treating lung fibrosis by reversing alveolar damage and decreasing myofibroblast proliferation and collagen accumulation [116]. Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC)-derived exosomes containing miR-126 attenuated LPS-induced ALI/ARDS and restored pulmonary integrity in a rat model of lung injury [117]. A mouse model study of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension revealed that the cyto-protective role of MSCs in the lung is mediated by exosomes [118]. Exosomes have also been used to treat neonatal lung diseases. Treatment of a neonatal mouse model of hyperoxia-induced BPD with MSC-exosomes significantly improved lung morphology and associated pulmonary fibrosis [119]. Blood plasma-derived exosomes for early diagnosis of lung cancer (NCT04529915) and exosome-based identification of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules (NCT04182893) are currently being investigated in clinical trials. However, more research is needed to explore the therapeutic potential and niche of exosomes.

Conclusions

Macrophages are critical players in maintaining homeostasis and immune responses to the external environment. Different types of macrophages secrete various pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signals and affect several processes ranging from immune protection to wound healing [120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127]. The pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory functions of macrophages depend on the cellular microenvironment, which enables fine-tuning of the transcriptomic and functional response according to homeostatic needs. Any dysregulation in this balance can lead to inflammation, cancer initiation, cardiovascular disorders, and development of fibrosis. Thus, macrophages are potential therapeutic targets in various disorders; however, the lack of efficient models to replicate macrophages has limited their therapeutic value.

The groundbreaking discovery by Takahashi and Yamanaka of stem cells has led to their use to model disease progression, test drugs, and design individual-specific treatments. PSC-derived macrophages have become a highly attractive source for cell and gene therapy. The iMph approach has been successful used to correct genetic mutations and improve phagocyte functions in CGD and VEOBD [64, 65]. The development of novel therapeutic targets for diseases involving macrophages such as pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and liver fibrosis further expands the therapeutic applications of PSC-derived macrophages. Pulmonary transplantation of gene-edited host macrophages into a murine model of hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis had beneficial therapeutic effects [128]. Transplantation of human iPSC-derived macrophages upon intrapulmonary development into AM-like cells resulted in a striking reduction of alveolar protein and surfactant D deposition and attenuated the hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (herPAP) phenotype [129]. TALEN-mediated integration of the corrected gene granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor alpha-chain (CD116) into patient-specific iPSCs resulted in functionally compatible macrophages [130]. Intratracheal injection of human iMphs in an acute P. aeruginosa infection model enhanced pulmonary immunity [50]. Therapeutic application of macrophages significantly reduced the amount of hepatic fibrosis in a model of liver injury [131]. Further, the identification of an active compound against M. tuberculosis using iMphs to screen a 3,716-compound library expanded the therapeutic uses for PSC-derived macrophages as drug testing models [132]. Together, these studies suggest that PSC-derived macrophages are promising biomaterials for the treatment of several diseases (Fig. 2).

EVs derived from macrophages have become widely accepted as disease biomarkers and therapeutic tools. For example, the presence of immune molecules on the surface of EVs [133] and elimination of macrophage-associated risks such as cytokine release syndrome [134] have highlighted the potential of macrophage-derived EVs in therapeutics. Future research should focus on establishing efficient protocols to generate economically feasible, high-yield, clinically-applicable generic macrophages. Elucidating the specific roles of lung macrophages in fibrotic lung disorders would facilitate the development of effective macrophage-based therapeutics.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

PF:

Pulmonary fibrosis

hPSC:

Human pluripotent stem cells

RBCs:

Red blood cells

AMs:

Alveolar macrophages

IMs:

Interstitial macrophages

TOLLIP:

Toll interacting protein

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

GM-CSF:

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

IRF-5:

Interferon regulatory factor 5

TRMs:

Tissue resident macrophages

M0s:

Resting macrophages

MDMs:

Monocyte-derived macrophages

EB:

Embryoid body

VEOBD:

Very-early onset bowel disease

PCLS:

Precision cut lung slices

MFG-E8:

Milk fat globule-EGF factor 8

EVs:

Extracellular vesicles

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BECs:

Bronchial epithelial cells

CRP:

C-reactive protein

sTNFR1:

Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1

ALI:

Acute lung injury

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BPD:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

hAECs:

Human amnion epithelial cells

herPAP:

Hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

References

  1. Saha S, Shalova IN, Biswas SK. Metabolic regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Immunol Rev. 2017;280(1):102–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Epelman S, Lavine KJ, Randolph GJ. Origin and functions of tissue macrophages. Immunity. 2014;41(1):21–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Guilliams M, Ginhoux F, Jakubzick C, Naik SH, Onai N, Schraml BU, et al. Dendritic cells, monocytes and macrophages: a unified nomenclature based on ontogeny. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(8):571–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yona S, Kim KW, Wolf Y, Mildner A, Varol D, Breker M, et al. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity. 2013;38(1):79–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schirmer M, Garner A, Vlamakis H, Xavier RJ. Microbial genes and pathways in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(8):497–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon S, Pluddemann A. Tissue macrophages: heterogeneity and functions. BMC Biol. 2017;15(1):53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guilliams M, De Kleer I, Henri S, Post S, Vanhoutte L, De Prijck S, et al. Alveolar macrophages develop from fetal monocytes that differentiate into long-lived cells in the first week of life via GM-CSF. J Exp Med. 2013;210(10):1977–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bedoret D, Wallemacq H, Marichal T, Desmet C, Quesada Calvo F, Henry E, et al. Lung interstitial macrophages alter dendritic cell functions to prevent airway allergy in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(12):3723–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne AJ, Mathie SA, Gregory LG, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary macrophages: key players in the innate defence of the airways. Thorax. 2015;70(12):1189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Wang Y, Wu G, Xiong W, Gu W, Wang CY. Macrophages: friend or foe in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Respir Res. 2018;19(1):170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Byrne AJ, Maher TM, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary macrophages: a new therapeutic pathway in fibrosing lung disease? Trends Mol Med. 2016;22(4):303–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lederer DJ, Martinez FJ. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1811–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Helling BA, Yang IV. Epigenetics in lung fibrosis: from pathobiology to treatment perspective. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2015;21(5):454–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis, etiology and regulation. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(2):103–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans CM, Fingerlin TE, Schwarz MI, Lynch D, Kurche J, Warg L, et al. A genetic disease that involves mucociliary dysfunction of the peripheral airways. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(4):1567–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Folcik VA, Garofalo M, Coleman J, Donegan JJ, Rabbani E, Suster S, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is strongly associated with productive infection by herpesvirus saimiri. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(6):851–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Sancho C, Buendia-Roldan I, Fernandez-Plata MR, Navarro C, Perez-Padilla R, Vargas MH, et al. Familial pulmonary fibrosis is the strongest risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2011;105(12):1902–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Diaz LA, Cronkhite JT, Katzenstein AL, Godwin JD, Raghu G, Glazer CS, et al. Telomere lengths, pulmonary fibrosis and telomerase (TERT) mutations. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Kuan PJ, Xing C, Cronkhite JT, Torres F, Rosenblatt RL, et al. Genetic defects in surfactant protein A2 are associated with pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(1):52–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawson WE, Grant SW, Ambrosini V, Womble KE, Dawson EP, Lane KB, et al. Genetic mutations in surfactant protein C are a rare cause of sporadic cases of IPF. Thorax. 2004;59(11):977–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Noth I, Zhang Y, Ma SF, Flores C, Barber M, Huang Y, et al. Genetic variants associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis susceptibility and mortality: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(4):309–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fingerlin TE, Murphy E, Zhang W, Peljto AL, Brown KK, Steele MP, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):613–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosas IO, Richards TJ, Konishi K, Zhang Y, Gibson K, Lokshin AE, et al. MMP1 and MMP7 as potential peripheral blood biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS Med. 2008;5(4):e93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuhn C, McDonald JA. The roles of the myofibroblast in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical features of sites of active extracellular matrix synthesis. Am J Pathol. 1991;138(5):1257–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuhn C 3rd, Boldt J, King TE Jr, Crouch E, Vartio T, McDonald JA. An immunohistochemical study of architectural remodeling and connective tissue synthesis in pulmonary fibrosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140(6):1693–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Myers JL, Katzenstein AL. Epithelial necrosis and alveolar collapse in the pathogenesis of usual interstitial pneumonia. Chest. 1988;94(6):1309–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Locati M, Mantovani A, Sica A. Macrophage activation and polarization as an adaptive component of innate immunity. Adv Immunol. 2013;120:163–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saradna A, Do DC, Kumar S, Fu QL, Gao P. Macrophage polarization and allergic asthma. Transl Res. 2018;191:1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, Fisher EA, Gilroy DW, Goerdt S, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Obstacles and opportunities for understanding macrophage polarization. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89(4):557–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong B, Yang X, Sun Q, Liu L, Lan X, Tian J, et al. Pdcd4 modulates markers of macrophage alternative activation and airway remodeling in antigen-induced pulmonary inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96(6):1065–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vijayan V, Pradhan P, Braud L, Fuchs HR, Gueler F, Motterlini R, et al. Human and murine macrophages exhibit differential metabolic responses to lipopolysaccharide-a divergent role for glycolysis. Redox Biol. 2019;22: 101147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Schneemann M, Schoeden G. Macrophage biology and immunology: man is not a mouse. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81(3):579 (discussion 580).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Albina JE, Reichner JS. Detection of reactive oxygen intermediate production by macrophages. Methods Mol Med. 2003;78:369–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Weinberg JB. Nitric oxide production and nitric oxide synthase type 2 expression by human mononuclear phagocytes: a review. Mol Med. 1998;4(9):557–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Summers KM, Bush SJ, Hume DA. Network analysis of transcriptomic diversity amongst resident tissue macrophages and dendritic cells in the mouse mononuclear phagocyte system. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(10): e3000859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodell CB, Koch PD, Weissleder R. Screening for new macrophage therapeutics. Theranostics. 2019;9(25):7714–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bosshart H, Heinzelmann M. THP-1 cells as a model for human monocytes. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(21):438.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Plesner A. Increasing the yield of human mononuclear cells and low serum conditions for in vitro generation of macrophages with M-CSF. J Immunol Methods. 2003;279(1–2):287–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brugger W, Kreutz M, Andreesen R. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor is required for human monocyte survival and acts as a cofactor for their terminal differentiation to macrophages in vitro. J Leukoc Biol. 1991;49(5):483–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoeffel G, Chen J, Lavin Y, Low D, Almeida FF, See P, et al. C-Myb(+) erythro-myeloid progenitor-derived fetal monocytes give rise to adult tissue-resident macrophages. Immunity. 2015;42(4):665–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hashimoto D, Chow A, Noizat C, Teo P, Beasley MB, Leboeuf M, et al. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity. 2013;38(4):792–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schulz C, Gomez Perdiguero E, Chorro L, Szabo-Rogers H, Cagnard N, Kierdorf K, et al. A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2012;336(6077):86–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, Nandi S, See P, Gokhan S, et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science. 2010;330(6005):841–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tasnim F, Xing J, Huang X, Mo S, Wei X, Tan MH. Generation of mature kupffer cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials. 2019;192:377–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee CZW, Kozaki T, Ginhoux F. Studying tissue macrophages in vitro: are iPSC-derived cells the answer? Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(11):716–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takata K, Kozaki T, Lee CZW, Thion MS, Otsuka M, Lim S, et al. Induced-pluripotent-stem-cell-derived primitive macrophages provide a platform for modeling tissue-resident macrophage differentiation and function. Immunity. 2017;47(1):183-198 e186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Buchrieser J, James W, Moore MD. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages share ontogeny with MYB-independent tissue-resident macrophages. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;8(2):334–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Vodyanik MA, Bork JA, Thomson JA, Slukvin II. Human embryonic stem cell-derived CD34+ cells: efficient production in the coculture with OP9 stromal cells and analysis of lymphohematopoietic potential. Blood. 2005;105(2):617–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ackermann M, Kempf H, Hetzel M, Hesse C, Hashtchin AR, Brinkert K, et al. Bioreactor-based mass production of human iPSC-derived macrophages enables immunotherapies against bacterial airway infections. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. van Wilgenburg B, Browne C, Vowles J, Cowley SA. Efficient, long term production of monocyte-derived macrophages from human pluripotent stem cells under partly-defined and fully-defined conditions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71098.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Panicker LM, Miller D, Park TS, Patel B, Azevedo JL, Awad O, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell model recapitulates pathologic hallmarks of Gaucher disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(44):18054–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Itskovitz-Eldor J, Schuldiner M, Karsenti D, Eden A, Yanuka O, Amit M, et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies compromising the three embryonic germ layers. Mol Med. 2000;6(2):88–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Konttinen H, Cabral-da-Silva MEC, Ohtonen S, Wojciechowski S, Shakirzyanova A, Caligola S, et al. PSEN1DeltaE9, APPswe, and APOE4 confer disparate phenotypes in human iPSC-derived microglia. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;13(4):669–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cao X, Yakala GK, van den Hil FE, Cochrane A, Mummery CL, Orlova VV. Differentiation and functional comparison of monocytes and macrophages from hiPSCs with peripheral blood derivatives. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;12(6):1282–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Takada S, Kambe N, Kawasaki Y, Niwa A, Honda-Ozaki F, Kobayashi K, et al. Pluripotent stem cell models of Blau syndrome reveal an IFN-gamma-dependent inflammatory response in macrophages. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(1):339-349 e311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yanagimachi MD, Niwa A, Tanaka T, Honda-Ozaki F, Nishimoto S, Murata Y, et al. Robust and highly-efficient differentiation of functional monocytic cells from human pluripotent stem cells under serum- and feeder cell-free conditions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e59243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Shiba T, Tanaka T, Ida H, Watanabe M, Nakaseko H, Osawa M, et al. Functional evaluation of the pathological significance of MEFV variants using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(5):1438-1441 e1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Brownjohn PW, Smith J, Solanki R, Lohmann E, Houlden H, Hardy J, et al. Functional studies of missense TREM2 mutations in human stem cell-derived microglia. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10(4):1294–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Haenseler W, Zambon F, Lee H, Vowles J, Rinaldi F, Duggal G, et al. Excess alpha-synuclein compromises phagocytosis in iPSC-derived macrophages. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Aflaki E, Borger DK, Moaven N, Stubblefield BK, Rogers SA, Patnaik S, et al. A new glucocerebrosidase chaperone reduces alpha-synuclein and glycolipid levels in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from patients with gaucher disease and parkinsonism. J Neurosci. 2016;36(28):7441–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Brault J, Goutagny E, Telugu N, Shao K, Baquie M, Satre V, et al. Optimized generation of functional neutrophils and macrophages from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells: ex vivo models of X(0)-linked, AR22(0)- and AR47(0)- chronic granulomatous diseases. Biores Open Access. 2014;3(6):311–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Klatt D, Cheng E, Philipp F, Selich A, Dahlke J, Schmidt RE, et al. Targeted repair of p47-CGD in iPSCs by CRISPR/Cas9: functional correction without cleavage in the highly homologous pseudogenes. Stem Cell Reports. 2019;13(4):590–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sens J, Hoffmann D, Lange L, Vollmer Barbosa P, Morgan M, Falk CS, et al. Knockout-induced pluripotent stem cells for disease and therapy modeling of IL-10-associated primary immunodeficiencies. Hum Gene Ther. 2021;32(1–2):77–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mukhopadhyay S, Heinz E, Porreca I, Alasoo K, Yeung A, Yang HT, et al. Loss of IL-10 signaling in macrophages limits bacterial killing driven by prostaglandin E2. J Exp Med. 2020;217(2):5520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lang J, Cheng Y, Rolfe A, Hammack C, Vera D, Kyle K, et al. An hPSC-derived tissue-resident macrophage model reveals differential responses of macrophages to ZIKV and DENV infection. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;11(2):348–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Yeung ATY, Hale C, Lee AH, Gill EE, Bushell W, Parry-Smith D, et al. Exploiting induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages to unravel host factors influencing Chlamydia trachomatis pathogenesis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Hale C, Yeung A, Goulding D, Pickard D, Alasoo K, Powrie F, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell derived macrophages as a cellular system to study salmonella and other pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0124307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Anderson JS, Bandi S, Kaufman DS, Akkina R. Derivation of normal macrophages from human embryonic stem (hES) cells for applications in HIV gene therapy. Retrovirology. 2006;3:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kim JH, An GH, Kim JY, Rasaei R, Kim WJ, Jin X, et al. Human pluripotent stem-cell-derived alveolar organoids for modeling pulmonary fibrosis and drug testing. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. de Hilster RHJ, Sharma PK, Jonker MR, White ES, Gercama EA, Roobeek M, et al. Human lung extracellular matrix hydrogels resemble the stiffness and viscoelasticity of native lung tissue. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020;318(4):L698–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Alsafadi HN, Uhl FE, Pineda RH, Bailey KE, Rojas M, Wagner DE, et al. Applications and approaches for three-dimensional precision-cut lung slices. Disease modeling and drug discovery. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2020;62(6):681–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Ahmed EM. Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res. 2015;6(2):105–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yanagihara T, Chong SG, Vierhout M, Hirota JA, Ask K, Kolb M. Current models of pulmonary fibrosis for future drug discovery efforts. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2020;15(8):931–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Strikoudis A, Cieslak A, Loffredo L, Chen YW, Patel N, Saqi A, et al. Modeling of fibrotic lung disease using 3D organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 2019;27(12):3709-3723 e3705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Korogi Y, Gotoh S, Ikeo S, Yamamoto Y, Sone N, Tamai K, et al. In vitro disease modeling of hermansky-pudlak syndrome type 2 using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;12(3):431–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Wong AP, Bear CE, Chin S, Pasceri P, Thompson TO, Huan LJ, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into mature airway epithelia expressing functional CFTR protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(9):876–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Kim JH, Kim J, Kim WJ, Choi YH, Yang SR, Hong SH. Diesel particulate matter 2.5 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and upregulation of SARS-CoV-2 receptor during human pluripotent stem cell-derived alveolar organoid development. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):5502.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tang PM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(3):144–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Thery C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Ye C, Li H, Bao M, Zhuo R, Jiang G, Wang W. Alveolar macrophage-derived exosomes modulate severity and outcome of acute lung injury. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(7):6120–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Huang R, Hao C, Wang D, Zhao Q, Li C, Wang C, et al. SPP1 derived from silica-exposed macrophage exosomes triggers fibroblast transdifferentiation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2021;422:115559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Guiot J, Cambier M, Boeckx A, Henket M, Nivelles O, Gester F, et al. Macrophage-derived exosomes attenuate fibrosis in airway epithelial cells through delivery of antifibrotic miR-142-3p. Thorax. 2020;75(10):870–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Pegtel DM, Gould SJ. Exosomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88:487–514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Rayamajhi S, Nguyen TDT, Marasini R, Aryal S. Macrophage-derived exosome-mimetic hybrid vesicles for tumor targeted drug delivery. Acta Biomater. 2019;94:482–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Ela S, Mager I, Breakefield XO, Wood MJ. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(5):347–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Mathivanan S, Fahner CJ, Reid GE, Simpson RJ. ExoCarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1241-1244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Tkach M, Thery C. Communication by extracellular vesicles: where we are and where we need to go. Cell. 2016;164(6):1226–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bovy N, Blomme B, Freres P, Dederen S, Nivelles O, Lion M, et al. Endothelial exosomes contribute to the antitumor response during breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy via microRNA transfer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(12):10253–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Njock MS, Cheng HS, Dang LT, Nazari-Jahantigh M, Lau AC, Boudreau E, et al. Endothelial cells suppress monocyte activation through secretion of extracellular vesicles containing antiinflammatory microRNAs. Blood. 2015;125(20):3202–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Li C, Deng C, Zhou T, Hu J, Dai B, Yi F, et al. MicroRNA-370 carried by M2 macrophage-derived exosomes alleviates asthma progression through inhibiting the FGF1/MAPK/STAT1 axis. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(7):1795–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Osada-Oka M, Shiota M, Izumi Y, Nishiyama M, Tanaka M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Macrophage-derived exosomes induce inflammatory factors in endothelial cells under hypertensive conditions. Hypertens Res. 2017;40(4):353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. McDonald MK, Tian Y, Qureshi RA, Gormley M, Ertel A, Gao R, et al. Functional significance of macrophage-derived exosomes in inflammation and pain. Pain. 2014;155(8):1527–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Cui H, He Y, Chen S, Zhang D, Yu Y, Fan C. Macrophage-derived miRNA-containing exosomes induce peritendinous fibrosis after tendon injury through the miR-21-5p/Smad7 pathway. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;14:114–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. van den Berge M, Tasena H. Role of microRNAs and exosomes in asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2019;25(1):87–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Li X, Yang N, Cheng Q, Zhang H, Liu F, Shang Y. MiR-21-5p in macrophage-derived exosomes targets Smad7 to promote epithelial mesenchymal transition of airway epithelial cells. J Asthma Allergy. 2021;14:513–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Krol J, Loedige I, Filipowicz W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(9):597–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Fujita Y, Araya J, Ito S, Kobayashi K, Kosaka N, Yoshioka Y, et al. Suppression of autophagy by extracellular vesicles promotes myofibroblast differentiation in COPD pathogenesis. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:28388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Borges FT, Melo SA, Ozdemir BC, Kato N, Revuelta I, Miller CA, et al. TGF-beta1-containing exosomes from injured epithelial cells activate fibroblasts to initiate tissue regenerative responses and fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(3):385–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Admyre C, Grunewald J, Thyberg J, Gripenback S, Tornling G, Eklund A, et al. Exosomes with major histocompatibility complex class II and co-stimulatory molecules are present in human BAL fluid. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(4):578–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Tan DBA, Armitage J, Teo TH, Ong NE, Shin H, Moodley YP. Elevated levels of circulating exosome in COPD patients are associated with systemic inflammation. Respir Med. 2017;132:261–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Sundar IK, Li D, Rahman I. Small RNA-sequence analysis of plasma-derived extracellular vesicle miRNAs in smokers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as circulating biomarkers. J Extracell Vesicles. 2019;8(1):1684816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Mims JW: Asthma. definitions and pathophysiology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015, 5 Suppl 1:S2–6.

  104. Mortaz E, Alipoor SD, Varahram M, Jamaati H, Garssen J, Mumby SE, et al. Update in their roles and potential in therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2862187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Malerba M, Radaeli A, Olivini A, Ragnoli B, Ricciardolo F, Montuschi P. The combined impact of exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophils monitoring in asthma treatment: a prospective cohort study. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(32):4752–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Malerba M, Ragnoli B, Radaeli A, Tantucci C. Usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophils in the long-term control of eosinophilic asthma. Chest. 2008;134(4):733–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Canas JA, Sastre B, Rodrigo-Munoz JM, Fernandez-Nieto M, Barranco P, Quirce S, et al. Eosinophil-derived exosomes contribute to asthma remodelling by activating structural lung cells. Clin Exp Allergy. 2018;48(9):1173–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Zhao M, Juanjuan L, Weijia F, Jing X, Qiuhua H, Hua Z, et al. Expression levels of MicroRNA-125b in serum exosomes of patients with asthma of different severity and its diagnostic significance. Curr Drug Metab. 2019;20(10):781–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Sgalla G, Iovene B, Calvello M, Ori M, Varone F, Richeldi L. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis and management. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Richeldi L, Collard HR, Jones MG. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet. 2017;389(10082):1941–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Yamada M. Extracellular vesicles: their emerging roles in the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases. Respir Investig. 2021;59(3):302–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Martin-Medina A, Lehmann M, Burgy O, Hermann S, Baarsma HA, Wagner DE, et al. Increased extracellular vesicles mediate WNT5A signaling in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(12):1527–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Matthay MA. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(Suppl 1):S54-57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Maremanda KP, Sundar IK, Rahman I. Protective role of mesenchymal stem cells and mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in cigarette smoke-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2019;385:114788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Tan JL, Lau SN, Leaw B, Nguyen HPT, Salamonsen LA, Saad MI, et al. Amnion epithelial cell-derived exosomes restrict lung injury and enhance endogenous lung repair. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7(2):180–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Dinh PC, Paudel D, Brochu H, Popowski KD, Gracieux MC, Cores J, et al. Inhalation of lung spheroid cell secretome and exosomes promotes lung repair in pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Wu X, Liu Z, Hu L, Gu W, Zhu L. Exosomes derived from endothelial progenitor cells ameliorate acute lung injury by transferring miR-126. Exp Cell Res. 2018;370(1):13–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Lee C, Mitsialis SA, Aslam M, Vitali SH, Vergadi E, Konstantinou G, et al. Exosomes mediate the cytoprotective action of mesenchymal stromal cells on hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2012;126(22):2601–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Willis GR, Mitsialis SA, Kourembanas S. “Good things come in small packages”: application of exosome-based therapeutics in neonatal lung injury. Pediatr Res. 2018;83(1–2):298–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Watanabe S, Alexander M, Misharin AV, Budinger GRS. The role of macrophages in the resolution of inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(7):2619–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Galloway DA, Phillips AEM, Owen DRJ, Moore CS. Phagocytosis in the brain: homeostasis and disease. Front Immunol. 2019;10:790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Hamidzadeh K, Christensen SM, Dalby E, Chandrasekaran P, Mosser DM. Macrophages and the recovery from acute and chronic inflammation. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79:567–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Weiss G, Schaible UE. Macrophage defense mechanisms against intracellular bacteria. Immunol Rev. 2015;264(1):182–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Arango Duque G, Descoteaux A. Macrophage cytokines: involvement in immunity and infectious diseases. Front Immunol. 2014;5:491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Wynn TA, Chawla A, Pollard JW. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature. 2013;496(7446):445–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Mantovani A, Biswas SK, Galdiero MR, Sica A, Locati M. Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling. J Pathol. 2013;229(2):176–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Mucci A, Kunkiel J, Suzuki T, Brennig S, Glage S, Kuhnel MP, et al. Murine iPSC-derived macrophages as a tool for disease modeling of hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis due to Csf2rb deficiency. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7(2):292–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Happle C, Lachmann N, Ackermann M, Mirenska A, Gohring G, Thomay K, et al. Pulmonary transplantation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages ameliorates pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(3):350–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Kuhn A, Ackermann M, Mussolino C, Cathomen T, Lachmann N, Moritz T. TALEN-mediated functional correction of human iPSC-derived macrophages in context of hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Haideri SS, McKinnon AC, Taylor AH, Kirkwood P, Starkey Lewis PJ, O’Duibhir E, et al. Injection of embryonic stem cell derived macrophages ameliorates fibrosis in a murine model of liver injury. NPJ Regen Med. 2017;2:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Han HW, Seo HH, Jo HY, Han HJ, Falcao VCA, Delorme V, et al. Drug discovery platform targeting M. tuberculosis with human embryonic stem cell-derived macrophages. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;13(6):980–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Kamerkar S, LeBleu VS, Sugimoto H, Yang S, Ruivo CF, Melo SA, et al. Exosomes facilitate therapeutic targeting of oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2017;546(7659):498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Schulert GS, Grom AA. Pathogenesis of macrophage activation syndrome and potential for cytokine- directed therapies. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:145–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We like to thank all members of SHH and SR lab for their help and support in reviewing the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (KFRM) funded by the Korean government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health & Welfare) (22A0304L1-01) as well as the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2022M3A9E4016936, 2022M3A9E4082648 and 2019R1A2C2005453). Finally, this study was funded in part by the “Experts Training Graduate Program for Particulate Matter Management”, a program of the Ministry of the Environment, Korea.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Roya Rasaei, Apoorvi Tyagi these authors equally contributed to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, 1 Kangwondaehakgil, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, 24431, South Korea

    Roya Rasaei, Seung-Joon Lee & Seok-Ho Hong

  2. Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea

    Apoorvi Tyagi, Kye-Seong Kim & Suresh Ramakrishna

  3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Science, Falavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Falavarjan, Iran

    Shima Rasaei

  4. Department of Thoracic and Cardiology, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea

    Se-Ran Yang

  5. Institute of Medical Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea

    Seok-Ho Hong

  6. KW-Bio Co., Ltd, Wonju, South Korea

    Seok-Ho Hong

Authors
  1. Roya Rasaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Apoorvi Tyagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shima Rasaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seung-Joon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Se-Ran Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kye-Seong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Suresh Ramakrishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seok-Ho Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SHH and SR supervised the overall process and wrote the manuscript. The main draft of the manuscript was written by RR and AT. Revised by SR, SJL, SRY and KSK. AT, SHH and SR constructed the figures and tables. All authors discussed the related studies and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Suresh Ramakrishna or Seok-Ho Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasaei, R., Tyagi, A., Rasaei, S. et al. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages and macrophage-derived exosomes: therapeutic potential in pulmonary fibrosis. Stem Cell Res Ther 13, 433 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03136-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-03136-z

Keywords

  • Macrophages
  • IPF
  • hPSC
  • Exosomes
  • Respiratory disease

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512