Open Access

Amnion-derived stem cells: in quest of clinical applications

Stem Cell Research & Therapy20112:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt66

Published: 19 May 2011

Abstract

In the promising field of regenerative medicine, human perinatal stem cells are of great interest as potential stem cells with clinical applications. Perinatal stem cells could be isolated from normally discarded human placentae, which are an ideal cell source in terms of availability, the fewer number of ethical concerns, less DNA damage, and so on. Numerous studies have demonstrated that some of the placenta-derived cells possess stem cell characteristics like pluripotent differentiation ability, particularly in amniotic epithelial (AE) cells. Term human amniotic epithelium contains a relatively large number of stem cell marker-positive cells as an adult stem cell source. In this review, we introduce a model theory of why so many AE cells possess stem cell characteristics. We also describe previous work concerning the therapeutic applications and discuss the pluripotency of the AE cells and potential pitfalls for amnion-derived stem cell research.

Introduction

The emerging field of regenerative medicine requires a reliable cell source in addition to biomaterial scaffolds and cytokine/growth factors. The 'cell' is a particularly critical element for cell replacement therapies in order to provide a safe and sufficient cell supply for clinical applications. Efforts to search for an adequate cell type and cell source have been conducted and have continued along with the discussions for their use in clinical application.

There are many potential cell sources for regenerative medicine, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, tissue-specific progenitor cells, embryonic stem (ES) cells, and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Although their biological potentials have been demonstrated, none of these cells is widely accepted as a definitive cell source for clinical applications. Each cell type possesses different advantages as well as limitations for their use, such as safety or availability. It will be helpful to search for a potential stem cell source from the perspective of its potential for clinical application. What is the sine qua non of the cells for clinically applicable regenerative medicine? At the end of this review, this question will be discussed further.

There is increasing evidence that the human placenta contains pluripotent or multipotent stem cells or both. Various multipotent stem cells have been isolated from different parts of the human placenta, such as the amnion, chorion, umbilical cord, and fetal blood. As placenta-derived cells, these stem cells have common advantages (Figure 1). Specific types of placenta-derived stem cells, such as trophoblastic, hematopoietic, and mesenchymal stroma cells, have been discussed elsewhere [13]. Here, we will review stem cells derived from the amnion of human placentae, specifically amniotic epithelial (AE) cells. First, we will summarize previous studies that have demonstrated the unique stem cell characteristics of AE cells. On the basis of these findings, we introduce a model theory that explains why some AE cells, unlike other adult somatic stem cells, may possess pluripotent features. Second, we will discuss topics and pitfalls that are currently under discussion. Third, previous works that are leading the therapeutic application of AE cells will be summarized. Last, the potential of the clinical application of AE-derived stem cells and the future direction of the research are discussed.
Figure 1

Advantages of amniotic epithelial cells for clinical application. Fundamental advantages of placenta-derived stem cells and amniotic epithelial cell-specific biological advantages are summarized. QOL, quality of life.

Amniotic epithelial cells: what is so special about them?

The epithelial cell population could be exclusively isolated from the amnions of term human placentae by specific enzymatic digestion [4]. The cell surface antigen profile data indicate that AE cells are basically homogeneous cell populations for most of the cell surface markers [5]; however, the reactivity against 'stem cell'-specific antigens varies. Following isolation, some of the AE cells express stem cell surface markers, such as stage-specific embryonic antigen-3 (SSEA-3) and SSEA-4 and tumor rejection antigen 1-60 (TRA1-60) and TRA1-81, which are known to be expressed on human ES cells [6]. About 15%, 50%, and 5% to 10% of naïve human AE (hAE) cells are positive for SSEA-3, SSEA-4, and TRA stem cell markers, respectively [7]. Normally, undifferentiated stem cells homogeneously express these stem cell markers [6]. The variance of the ratio of stem cell marker-positive cells indicates that naïve AE cell populations contain cells in various stage of 'stemness'. Interestingly, the ratios of stem cell marker-positive AE cells (5% to 50%) are considerably higher than for other somatic/tissue stem cells. Most of the somatic/tissue stem cells are 0.1% to 0.01% of the residing tissue. For instance, the hematopoietic stem cell population is only 0.01% to 0.05% of all bone marrow cells [8]. The relatively high ratio of stem cell marker-positive cells in AE cell populations as somatic stem cells could be explained by the model theory. The cell surface markers that are expressed by hAE cells are summarized and compared with the expression of other types of stem cells in Table 1[2, 7, 915].
Table 1

Comparison of stem cell surface marker expression in stem cells

 

AE

ES

NS

MS

HS

First author

Fatimah

Bilic

Stadler

Banas

Parolini

Minas

Ilancheran

Miki

Osman

   

Reference

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[2]

[13]

[14]

[5, 7]

[15]

   

c-met

   

+

      

+

 

CCR4

   

-

   

±

+

   

CD10

    

+

     

+

 

CD105

  

Up

 

+

     

+

 

CD106 (VCAM-1)

       

-

  

+

 

CD117 (c-kit)

-

  

-

±

  

±

  

+

+

CD13

  

Up

 

+

     

+

 

CD14

    

-

       

CD133

   

-

   

-

+

+

+

+

CD140b

    

+

       

CD166 (ALCAM)

 

+

  

+

     

+

 

CD24

   

+

   

+

+

+

  

CD29

   

+

+

   

+

 

+

 

CD31 (PECAM-1)

-

      

-

  

-

 

CD324 (E-cadherin)

   

+

+

  

+

+

   

CD338 (ABCG2)

   

+

   

+

+

+

 

+

CD34

-

-

 

-

-

  

-

  

-

+

CD349

    

-

       

CD44

+

+

Up

 

+

     

+

 

CD45

-

-

  

-

     

-

 

CD49d

    

-

       

CD49e

 

+

Up

 

+

       

CD49f

   

+

   

+

+

   

CD54 (ICAM-1)

  

+

    

+

  

+

 

CD73

+

+

  

+

     

+

 

CD9

+

  

+

   

+

+

+

  

CD90

+

 

Up

Up

+

 

+

   

+

 

GCTM2

    

+

+

  

+

   

Sialyl Lewis a

    

+

       

SSEA-1

   

-

-

 

-

-

-

   

SSEA3

 

+

 

+

+

 

+

+

+

   

SSEA4

 

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

   

TRA1-60

  

Down

+

+

 

+

+

+

   

TRA1-81

  

Down

+

+

 

+

+

+

   

-, negative; +, positive; ±, weak; AE, amniotic epithelial cell; Down, downregulated each antigen expression; ES, embryonic stem cell; HS, hematopoietic stem cell; MS, mesenchymal stem cell; NS, neural stem cell; SSEA, stage-specific embryonic antigen; TRA, tumor rejection antigen; Up, upregulated each antigen expression.

Stem cells 'left behind': developmental uniqueness of the amniotic epithelial cell

Unlike other parts of the placenta, the amniotic epithelium is a tissue of epiblastic origin. Human amnioblast is derived from the pluripotent epiblast around the eighth day following fertilization, whereas other parts of the placenta are derived from the trophectoderm. When the blastocyst is partially embedded in the endometrial stroma, the inner cell mass (or embryoblast) differentiates into two layers: the hypoblast and the epiblast. The epiblast is the source of all three germ layers and eventually forms the developing embryo. At the same time, a small cavity (amniotic cavity) appears within the epiblast. Epiblast cells adjacent to the amniotic cavity (Figure 2) are called amnioblasts, which eventually form the amniotic epithelium. Concomitantly, some of the migrating hypoblasts transdifferentiate into mesenchymal cells (extraembryonic mesoderm) and develop into the amniotic connective tissue. The epiblast-amnioblast segregation occurs before gastrulation, which is considered the first dynamic event of organogenesis. All short-range organogenetic signals may not reach the segregated stem cells throughout gestation. For instance, cardiogenesis is a complex event that is orchestrated by short-range fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and Hedge-hog signals [16]. Therefore, some epiblasts/amnioblasts that are spatially segregated by the amniotic cavity from the epicenter of organogenesis may escape from these differentiation cues. After 10 months, although most of the cells have differentiated by following the epithelial cell fate and have lost their stem cell characteristics, about 5% to 10% of the AE cells may retain the epiblast-like stem cell characteristics at term [7]. If this model theory is correct, fetal amniotic epithelium should contain more stem cell marker-positive cells than term amniotic epithelium. Izumi and colleagues [17] demonstrated that about 40% and 30% of fetal (early second trimester) AE cells are positive for stem cell markers TRA1-60 and TRA 1-81, respectively, whereas 5% of term AE cells are positive for these markers. The amnion is a fairly large tissue that may not be very uniform but is rather regionalized [18]. To exclude variances due to the regionalized stem cell localization, amnion samples were harvested from three different parts of the amnion: the center of the disc, the edge of the disc, and the membrane part. There was no significant difference between samples by region, at least in these three parts [19]. On the other hand, the mechanism and signals that induce differentiation on 90% of amnioblasts of epiblast origin are unclear. It has been shown that cultured AE cells secrete various morphogens and growth factors such as epidermal growth factor, Noggin, Activin [20], platelet-derived growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, angio-genin, transforming growth factor-beta-2 (TGF-β2), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) [21]. In addition to playing an important role in maintaining pregnancy, these factors may induce AE cell maturation or apoptosis to the epiblast-like immature AE cells. It must be noted that hAE cells are able to support the pluripotency of primate and mouse ES cells when primary hAE cells were used as feeder layer cells [22, 23]. These data indicate that some of the secreted factors or cell-to-cell signaling (or both) might play a role in maintaining epiblast-like stemness of some AE cells. There are, however, no clear experimental data that indicate why the stem cell marker-positive AE cells unevenly differentiate even though all AE cells are exposed to the same environmental signals from the amniotic fluid. One of the possible mechanisms is 'lateral inhibition', which is a type of cell-to-cell interaction to regulate cell fate in the development of various cell types. This could be an interesting question for further investigation.
Figure 2

Illustration of 'stem cell left behind' theory. At 8 days after fertilization, inner cell mass differentiates into epiblast and hypoblast. An amniotic cavity appears in the middle of the epiblast. As the cavity grows, the spatial segregation allows some amnioblasts to retain epiblast-like stem cells. Red stars indicate an amniotic cavity, and pink arrows indicate short-range organogenic signals that could not reach the amnioblasts.

Amniotic epithelial cells possess pluripotency?

In addition to expressing stem cell-specific surface markers, AE cells express molecular markers of pluripotent stem cells: octamer-4 (OCT-4), NANOG, sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX-2), Lefty-A, FGF-4, REX-1, and teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1 (TDGF-1) (cripto-1). Among those molecular stem cell markers, OCT-4 is known as one of the transcription factors that play a critical role in maintaining pluripotency and self-renewal. OCT-4 belongs to the POU family of transcriptional regulators [2426] and regulates the pluripotency of human and mouse ES cells [27]. Expression of OCT-4 is decreased along with the stem cell differentiation and the loss of expression leading to differentiation [28]. At the epiblast stage, OCT-4 continues to be expressed as long as cells remain undifferentiated [26]. The expression of OCT-4 is controlled epigenetically by hypermethylation of the enhancer/promoter region [29].

OCT-4 protein expression is observed in most AE cells. Some display nuclear-localized OCT-4, but for the majority of AE cells, the expression is cytoplasmic. There is concern over the OCT-4 expression in somatic cells [30]. OCT-4 exists as two splice variants: OCT-4A and OCT-4B [31]. Recent studies have suggested that it is the OCT-4A isoform that has the ability to confer and sustain pluripotency but that the OCT-4B may not be functional [32, 33]. Lengner and colleagues [34] pointed out that published data describing positive results of OCT-4 expression in somatic stem cells might be erroneous because of investigator ignorance of the two isoforms. Primers or antibodies that recognize both isoforms might be misused to claim functional OCT-4 expression in some somatic stem cells. We have confirmed OCT-4A expression in naïve hAE cells by using a commercially available primer and probe set (Hs0300511_g1; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) that matches OCT-4A-specificexons [17].

Although a number of investigations have provided evidence that suggests multipotency of AE cells, the pluripotency has not yet been proven. One of the critical issues is the difficulty to establish clonal expansion from a single AE cell, a step that is essential to demonstrate pluripotency in vitro. Unlike mouse ES cells, human ES cells and mouse epiblast-derived stem (EpiSC) cells are intolerant to passaging as single cells. Like EpiSC cells, AE cells do not maintain their stem cell characteristics well or survive as a single cell in culture. AE cells easily fall into the senescence state or differentiate into palmshaped epithelial cells when cultured at low density. The teratoma formation assay has been used as a gold standard assay to prove pluripotency of ES or iPS cells. However, this assay cannot be applied to evaluate AE cells. Because of the genetically stable characteristics, the AE cell does not form a teratoma when injected into immunodefficient mice [7, 14]. The ultimate approach to determine pluripotency of AE-derived stem cells is generating chimeric animals. If an AE cell that is injected into the blastocyst will contribute to all germ layer cells in the resulting chimeric embryo, the pluripotency will be confirmed. In 2004, Tamagawa and colleagues [35] derived cell lines from human amnion and mixed them with mouse early embryonic stem cells to form an aggregation chimera. The authors succeeded in demonstrating that the human cells contributed to all three primordial germ layer formations in the xenogeneic chimera embryo [35]. Although the cell line cells are established from a mixed amniotic cell population that contains both AE cells and amniotic mesenchymal fibroblasts, this investigation suggested the pluripotency of the human amniotic cells. Further investigation will be required to clarify which cell population is responsible for the pluripotency.

Multipotency of amniotic epithelial cells and the therapeutic potential

Although the pluripotency of a single AE cell is not clarified yet, AE cells differentiate into cells of all three germ layers under appropriate culture conditions [7, 14]. The changes of gene expression and cell morphology of AE cells in these experiments demonstrated the AE cell plasticity that is induced by exposure to exogenous growth factors or chemicals. At present, it has not been confirmed whether a single pluripotent amniotic stem cell differentiates into all three germ layers or whether there are various lineage-committed multipotent cells in the AE cell population. In spite of this critical question from a basic science point of view, it is a secondary concern from the perspective of clinical application. Since it is impossible to simultaneously induce the desired differentiation in 100% of the starting material of stem cells, some form of purification process is essential prior to using stem cell-derived therapeutic cells in clinical application. Therefore, the most important question from a clinical point of view is whether therapeutically useful cells can be produced from the hAE cell population. Here, we summarize previous works that suggest the differentiation potential of AE cells and the therapeutic potential tested in animal models.

It must be noted that there are developmental and anatomical differences between rodent and human amnion. Rodent amniotic epithelium is clearly derived from epiblasts; therefore, the usage of rodent AE cells as a model could be appropriate. However, owing to the size and anatomical uniqueness, the isolation of AE cells must be done very carefully. Recently, Dobreva and colleagues [36] focused on the species differences of the amnion and comprehensively reviewed this topic. This review is strongly recommended to researchers who plan to conduct research with rodent amnion stem cells, including amniotic fluid-derived stem cells.

Ectoderm lineage

Neurodegenerative diseases are among the most suitable target diseases for stem cell-based therapies. Since neurodegenerative diseases have many pathological processes in common, the cell transplantation approach could potentially ameliorate the symptoms of several distinct neurodegenerative diseases. There are two expected mechanisms of cell transplantation. One is the differentiation potential of the transplanted stem/progenitor cells to neural cells. Sakuragawa's group [37], pioneers in AE research, demonstrated that cultured AE cells express markers of glial and neuronal progenitor cells. Our group confirmed that naïve hAE cells express various neural marker genes, including neuron-specific enolase, neurofilament-M, myelin basic protein, microtubule -associated protein 2, and glial fibrillary acid protein [7]. Under appropriate culture conditions, AE cells express or upregulate neuron-specific gene expressions such as nestin and glutamic acid descarboxylase. Using the adenoviral labeling system, Ishii and colleagues [38] demonstrated that about 20% of hAE cells express oligodendrocyte marker genes, myelin basic protein, proteolipid protein, and 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phos-phodiesterase (CNPase). The neural differentiation capabilities of AE cells were confirmed by various researchers [39, 40]. Amazingly, the capabilities were preserved even after long-term cryopreservation. Human amniocytes that were originally isolated in 1974 adopted neuronal morphology and expression of neural genes, including β-III-tublin, Gap-43, NF-M, TAU, and synaptophysin, after more than 30 years [41].

The other expectation of cell transplantation for neurodegenerative diseases is the ability to secrete functional or protective factors from the transplanted cells such as dopamine or some other factors, which result in protective/trophic effects or immunomodulatory effects [42, 43]. For instance, in Parkinson's disease, there is a loss of the dopaminergic neural population in the substantia nigra [44]. In clinical settings, it has been shown that dopamine-producing tissue (fetal mesencephalic grafts) transplantation could ameliorate the symptoms [45]. hAE cells synthesize and release dopamine [46, 47]. The dopamine synthesis responds to supplemented L-DOPA (L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) concentration in a dosedependent manner. Furthermore, transplanted AE cells might release neuroprotective factors or induce neurogenesis to improve diseased or damaged environments or both. It has been shown that hAE cells produce and secrete various types of trophic factors such as nerve growth factor, neurotrophin-3, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor [4851].

This neural differentiation and neurotrophic potential of hAE cells has been tested in animal models. Transplanted hAE cells alleviated Parkinson-like symptoms in a dopamine-denervated rat model [52]. In these experiments, the engrafted hAE cells showed paracrine or neurotrophic effects rather than a contribution via neural differentiation. However, when rat AE cells were transplanted into ischemic hippocampus of adult gerbils, the rat AE-derived neuron-like cells were observed after 5 weeks of the transplantation [53]. The neural differentiation and the therapeutic effect of AE cells were also tested in a rat stroke model. The transplanted hAE cells migrated to the ischemic area and reduced infarct volume and improved behavioral function [54]. Recently, Suh [55] reported that hAE cell transplantation restored memory function in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Although the mechanism is under investigation, these data encourage the clinical applications of the hAE cells for neurodegenerative diseases.

Endoderm lineage

Two cell types, hepatocytes and insulin-producing pancreatic cells, are most desired among the endoderm lineage cells. Both cells have been used for cell replacement therapies and their therapeutic concept and efficiency have been shown [5659]. The insufficient supply of human hepatocytes or beta cells, however, is one of the reasons that prevent these promising therapies from becoming standard clinical applications. Thus, safe and constant supplies of these functional cells are urgently required. In addition, stem cell-derived hepatocytes will be useful not only for cell replacement therapy (hepatocyte transplantation) [57] but also for toxicology and drug development [60].

Sakuragawa and colleagues [61] reported that cultured hAE cells expressed and produced albumin and α-feto-protein in vitro and in vivo. The hepatic characteristics of hAE cells were extensively investigated by Takashima and colleagues [62]. Our group applied a step-wise exogenous growth factor stimulation protocol to induce further hepatic maturation in hAE cells [63]. The AE-derived hepatocyte-like cells expressed late-phase hepatic differentiation markers, including various inducible cytohrome P450 genes, which are essential for drug meta-bolism as functional hepatocytes. These cells were also transplanted into immunodeficient mice, and human α-1 antitrypsin was detected circulating in the serum of recipient mice, and this confirmed that the engrafted hAE cells function as hepatocytes in mouse liver. Recently, Manuelpillai and colleagues [64] transplanted hAE cells into drug-induced cirrhosis model animals and demonstrated the anti-fibrosis effect of hAE cells. The data indicate that the therapeutic effect of transplanted hAE cells is more likely the immunomodulatory effect by suppressing inflammatory activation of hepatic stellate cells. On the other hand, the authors demonstrated human albumin in mouse sera that might be secreted from differentiated hAE-derived hepatic cells. Rat amniotic cells have been isolated and used to simulate allogeneic cell transplantation [6567]. The transplanted rat AE cells survived in the liver following allogeneic transplantation for at least 30 days [65]. Although the rodent amniotic cell property might be different from that of humans, the therapeutic efficiency of AE cells, together with the basal advantages of the placenta-derived stem cells, suggests a treatment option for liver diseases.

Several groups demonstrated the pancreatic differentiation potential of hAE cells [7, 68, 69]. Under appropriate culture conditions, pancreatic cell-related genes such as PDX-1, PAX-6, NKX2.2, insulin, and glucagon were up-regulated in vitro [7]. The therapeutic potential was also demonstrated by the transplantation of cultured hAE cells in the spleen of diabetic mice. The serum glucose levels were normalized for several months after the transplant, suggesting that the transplanted AE cells differentiated into insulin-producing beta cells [68]. This finding was later confirmed with comprehensive analyses that demonstrated glucose-responsive c-peptide production [69]. In vitro differentiation and involvement of histamine nicotinamide-induced pancreatic differentiation were further investigated [70].

In addition to the hepatic and pancreatic differentiation, the capability of AE cells differentiating into other types of endoderm lineage cells has been reported. Moodley and colleagues [71] demonstrated that naïve human amnion epithelial cells differentiate into lung epithelium (type II pneumocyte) 2 weeks after parenteral injection into a bleomycin-induced lung injury SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency) mice model. The transplanted hAE cells reduced inflammation and abrogated fibrosis post-lung injury. Moritoki and colleagues [72] systemically transplanted EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein)-transgenic mice AE cells into chemically induced cholestasis mouse model animals. The EGFP and cholangiocyte marker CK7 double-positive cells formed a bile duct-like tubular structure in the chronic cholestatic mouse liver.

Mesoderm lineage

Because adult cardiomyocytes do not regenerate sufficiently, there is great interest in finding suitable cell sources for cellular cardiomyoplasty. hAE cells also possess the potential to differentiate into cardiac cells [7]. Although AE-derived cardiomyocyte-like cells expressed cardiac differentiation marker genes, immunocyto-chemistry analysis showed that the expression pattern of α-actinin was similar to that of immature cardiomyocytes. The therapeutic potential was demonstrated by using rat amniotic cells and a rat acute infarction model [73]. Although transplanted rat amniotic cells dramatically improved the cardiac function, only a few transplanted cells were differentiated into cardiomyocytes (α-actinin-positive cells). The therapeutic effect was speculated to be due to paracrine or immunomodulatory effects of the rat amniotic cells. An interesting application of amniotic membrane was tested, and the therapeutic efficiency was demonstrated. Cargnoni and colleagues [74] applied a fragment of human amniotic membrane as a cardiac patch on an infarction area of a rat heart. The post-ischemic cardiac function was significantly improved with the amnion patch. This investigation importantly demonstrated that secondary cardiac ischemic injury could be prevented by humoral factors that are released from the amnion. Recently, functional cardiac differentiation of human amniotic cells was demonstrated [75]. The cardiomyogenic differentiation was induced by a co-culture system with murine fetal cardio-myocytes. The structure of sarcomeric α-actinin and the spontaneous beating and in vivo contribution of human amnion-derived cardiomyocytes were demonstrated. Stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes are also expected to be an important new tool for drug development [60]. The in vitro functional hAE-derived cardiomyocytes could be a cell source for these assays. Further investigation for culture condition optimization or direct reprogramming will be required along with a definition of selection markers of functional mature cardiomyocytes. The studies that demonstrate the differentiation capability of AE cells into all three germ layer lineages are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Differentiation potential of amniotic epithelial cells

Lineage

Cell type

Species

First author

Reference

Ectoderm

Neural progenitor cell

Human

Sakuragawa

[37]

 

Dopamine-producing cell

Human

Kakishita

[47, 52]

 

Neural cell

Human

Miki

[7]

 

Oligodendrocyte

Human

Ishii

[38]

 

Neural cell

Human

Niknejad

[40]

 

Neural cell

Human

Woodbury

[41]

 

Neuronal

Rat

Okawa

[53]

 

Neural

Rat

Marcus

[67]

Mesoderm

Adipogenic

Human

Ilancheran

[14]

 

Chondrogenic

Human

Ilancheran

[14]

 

Osteogenic

Human

Stadler

[11]

 

Cardiomyogenic

Human

Miki

[7]

 

Cardiomyogenic

Human

Tsuji

[75]

 

Cardiomyogenic

Rat

Fujimoto

[73]

Endoderm

Hepatic

Human

Miki

[7, 63]

 

Hepatic

Human

Sakuragawa

[61]

 

Hepatic

Human

Takashima

[62]

 

Hepatic

Human

Manuelpillai

[64]

 

Hepatic

Rat

Nakajima

[65]

 

Hepatic

Rat

Takahashi

[66]

 

Hepatic

Rat

Marcus

[67]

 

Insulin-producing cell

Human

Miki

[7]

 

Insulin-producing cell

Human

Wei

[68]

 

Insulin-producing cell

Human

Hou

[69]

 

Insulin-producing cell

Human

Szukiewicz

[70]

 

Bile duct

Mouse

Moritoki

[72]

 

Pneumocyte

Human

Moodley

[71]

Advantages of human amniotic epithelial cells for clinical applications

From the view of clinicians and patients, the sine qua non of clinically applicable stem cells is first, 'safety'; second, 'therapeutic efficiency'; and, last, 'availability/sufficient quantity'. Several types of stem cells could serve as cell sources for cellular therapy. Generally, stem cells are classified according to their differentiation ability and origin. Pluripotent stem cells, such as ES cells and iPS cells, are considered to be the most promising stem cells because of their tremendous differentiation ability. The 'safety', however, is always a concern. The pluripotency comes with genetical instability, which leads to concerns for tumorigenicity. Although the 'therapeutic efficiency' is promised, the long-term efficiency has not yet been proven. Furthermore, the expansion and maintenance to obtain a therapeutically sufficient number of cells require time, effort, and cost.

Adult stem cells can be derived from virtually any tissue or organ. Most adult stem cells are tissue-specific lineage-committed multipotent cells. Some adult stem cells such as mesenchymal stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells are already applied in clinics and showed therapeutic efficiency, mainly with their immunomodulatory property. Therefore, the clinical applications are considerably safe, particularly in the case of autologous transplantation.

A similar immunomodulatory property has been demonstrated with hAE cells [7680]. hAE cells inhibited allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions in a dose-dependent manner with 66% to 93% inhibition [81]. Most of the report demonstrated the immunomodulatory effect by secretion of suppressive mediators such as TNF-α, FasL, TRAIL, TGF-β, and MIF. On the other hand, Banas and colleagues [12] demonstrated that the immunomodulatory effect of AE cells is dependent on cell-to-cell contact with responding T cells. By using non-serum culture conditions, the authors demonstrated that hAE cells inhibit peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferative responses to mitogen, alloantigen, and recall antigen but preactivated T-cell blast response. The results suggested that the presence of HLA-G immunological cell surface molecules is responsible for the cell-to-cell immunosuppressive properties of AE cells. In addition to the HLA-G expression [8284], the expressions of complement inhibitory proteins, CD59 antigen, decay-accelerating factor, membrane attack complex, and Fas antigen/CD95/APO1 have been reported as potential immunoregulatory factors from hAE cells [8588]. Nevertheless, further investigation is required to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the immunomodulatory effect of hAE cells.

Importantly, the safety of AE upon transplantation has been shown in a clinical setting. hAE cells have been used in clinics to correct lysosomal storage disease [8991]. Although the applications were not conducted as a stem cell therapy, more than 50 cases of AE cell/tissue transplantations have been performed in various institutes [9092]. No tumor formation has been reported from these clinical trials. As it has been described, AE cells are clearly non-tumorigenic when transplanted into immunodeficient animals [7, 14]. A total of one to two million hAE cells was injected into more than 50 individual mice, which were observed for a maximum of 516 days. None of the AE cell transplants has led to the development of tumors by any route of administration in SCID-beige mice or Rag-2 knockout mice. In parallel, cytogenetic analysis confirmed genetical stability of cultured AE cells [7]. AE cells do not express telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mRNA [7]. A study demonstrated that immortalized cells by expression of TERT could exhibit some neoplastic transformation toward what seem to be cancer stem cells [93]. Missing TERT expression may be a safety advantage. Since more than 100 million cells can be isolated from one placenta, long-term culture and massive replication are not required to use AE cells as a cell source. For instance, only half a million cells will be sufficient to improve the devastating symptoms of Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease [94, 95]. Furthermore, human placenta is a neonatal tissue that has less age-acquired and environmental DNA damage. Naturally, the neonatal cells should possess a life-long viability. Given these facts, the AE cell is clearly a safe cell for clinical application.

A placenta is discarded after every live birth; objections to derive stem cells from placentae are not expected. Isolating and using stem cells from discarded human tissue are ultimate recycling biotechnologies, which would be acceptable in today's society. Human placenta is readily available tissue wherever human society exists. Therefore, there will be no regional disparities for placenta-derived stem cell therapies. Current statistics indicate that there are over 4 million births and over 1 million cesarean sections performed in the US every year. The sheer volume of available placenta tissue leads us to the idea of establishing a biobank system for placenta-derived stem cells. Nakatsuji and colleagues [96] estimated that a cell bank with only 30 stem cell lines could match the HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR haplotypes in 82.2% of the Japanese population. On the basis of these estimations and the theoretical number of available placentae, it is clearly feasible to establish a biobank that stores human placenta-derived stem cells with all HLA haplotypes. Clinically relevant stem cells should be easily and reproducibly cultured and manipulated. The AE cell isolation procedure is relatively easy and does not require a special laboratory set-up [4]. The biobanking system therefore could be established in any country and connected as a network to provide all HLA types, including race dominant types.

Ethical issues surrounding both embryonic and fetal stem cells do not apply to the use of discarded human placentae. However, once the therapeutic efficiency of placenta-derived stem cells is demonstrated, this normally discarded medical waste may turn into valuable property. The cell-acquiring process, cost, and proprietary rights will be new ethical issues. A regulatory-compliant system will be required for cell-acquiring and -providing processes. The precedent and current regulations for the umbilical cord blood cell usage could be useful to prepare a guideline for procurements of placenta-derived stem cells [97].

The use of this ideal stem cell could take one of two directions in future clinical regenerative medicine. One direction will be in developing technology to derive pluripotent stem cell lines from AE cells, which possess a biological potential equivalent to that of ES cells and iPS cells. This direction, however, may eliminate the AE cell advantage that is discussed here. The other direction is to aim directly at differentiation to obtain functional target cells. The stem cell-derived cell therapy requires a selection step prior to the cell application to patients to ensure safety and efficiency. The genetic stability and non-tumorigenicity of AE cells will be the advantage for this approach. Unlike in ES cells or iPS cells, leakage concerns at the selection step will not be a critical issue.

Conclusions

Herein, we reviewed the stem cell characteristics of amnion cells, especially AE cells. We introduced a model theory that may explain why so many cells with stem cell features are present in the amnion. The model theory has been proposed by several research teams, including ours [5, 7, 14, 34]. Previous studies that demonstrate the differentiation and therapeutic potential of AE cells were summarized. We described four major reasons why placenta-derived cells are a significant cell source for clinical applications. The AE cell meets two important conditions that are required for clinically relevant stem cells: safety and availability. So far, no stem cells are able to differentiate into therapeutically useful cell types in vitro, or their differentiation is not well controlled. As with other types of stem cells, further investigations will be required to induce AE cells to differentiate into therapeutically useful cells. Since AE cells are extremely safe and show therapeutic efficiency in animal models, clinical application should be considered in the near future.

Abbreviations

AE: 

amniotic epithelial

EGFP: 

enhanced green fluorescent protein

EpiSC: 

epiblast-derived stem

ES: 

embryonic stem

FGF: 

fibroblast growth factor

hAE: 

human amniotic epithelial

HLA: 

human leukocyte antigen

iPS: 

induced pluripotent stem

OCT-4: 

octamer-4

SCID: 

severe combined immunodeficiency

SSEA: 

stage-specific embryonic antigen

TERT: 

telomerase reverse transcriptase

TRA: 

tumor rejection antigen.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Claudia A Huggins for her assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Developmental Biology, University of Pittsburgh
(2)
Current affiliation: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at USC University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine

References

  1. Fauza D: Amniotic fluid and placental stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004, 18: 877-891. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Parolini O, Alviano F, Bagnara GP, Bilic G, Bühring HJ, Evangelista M, Hennerbichler S, Liu B, Magatti M, Mao N, Miki T, Marongiu F, Nakajima H, Nikaido T, Portmann-Lanz CB, Sankar V, Soncini M, Stadler G, Surbek D, Takahashi TA, Redl H, Sakuragawa N, Wolbank S, Zeisberger S, Zisch A, Strom SC: Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the first international workshop on placenta derived stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 300-311. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pozzobon M, Ghionzoli M, De Coppi P: ES, iPS, MSC, and AFS cells. Stem cells exploitation for Pediatric Surgery: current research and perspective. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010, 26: 3-10. 10.1007/s00383-009-2478-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Miki T, Marongiu F, Dorko K, Ellis EC, Strom SC: Isolation of amniotic epithelial stem cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2010, Chapter 1: Unit 1E 3-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Miki T, Strom SC: Amnion-derived pluripotent/multipotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2006, 2: 133-142. 10.1007/s12015-006-0020-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson JK, Draper JS, Baillie HS, Fishel S, Thomson JA, Moore H, Andrews PW: Preimplantation human embryos and embryonic stem cells show comparable expression of stage-specific embryonic antigens. Stem Cells. 2002, 20: 329-337. 10.1634/stemcells.20-4-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Miki T, Lehmann T, Cai H, Stolz DB, Strom SC: Stem cell characteristics of amniotic epithelial cells. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 1549-1559. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M, Reitsma M, Dohse M, Osborne L, Wang X, Finegold M, Weissman IL, Grompe M: Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 1229-1234. 10.1038/81326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fatimah SS, Ng SL, Chua KH, Hayati AR, Tan AE, Tan GC: Value of human amniotic epithelial cells in tissue engineering for cornea. Hum Cell. 2010, 23: 141-151. 10.1111/j.1749-0774.2010.00096.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilic G, Zeisberger SM, Mallik AS, Zimmermann R, Zisch AH: Comparative characterization of cultured human term amnion epithelial and mesenchymal stromal cells for application in cell therapy. Cell Transplant. 2008, 17: 955-968. 10.3727/096368908786576507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Stadler G, Hennerbichler S, Lindenmair A, Peterbauer A, Hofer K, van Griensven M, Gabriel C, Redl H, Wolbank S: Phenotypic shift of human amniotic epithelial cells in culture is associated with reduced osteogenic differentiation in vitro. Cytotherapy. 2008, 10: 743-752. 10.1080/14653240802345804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Banas RA, Trumpower C, Bentlejewski C, Marshall V, Sing G, Zeevi A: Immunogenicity and immunomodulatory effects of amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells. Hum Immunol. 2008, 69: 321-328. 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Minas V, Mylonas I, Schiessl B, Mayr D, Schulze S, Friese K, Jeschke U, Makrigiannakis A: Expression of the blood-group-related antigens Sialyl Lewis a, Sialyl Lewis x and Lewis y in term placentas of normal, preeclampsia, IUGR- and HELLP-complicated pregnancies. Histochem Cell Biol. 2007, 128: 55-63. 10.1007/s00418-007-0293-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ilancheran S, Michalska A, Peh G, Wallace EM, Pera M, Manuelpillai U: Stem cells derived from human fetal membranes display multilineage differentiation potential. Biol Reprod. 2007, 77: 577-588. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.055244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Osman I, Crawford M, Jordan F, Young A, Norman J, Thomson A: Expression and localization of cell adhesion molecules in human fetal membranes during parturition. J Reprod Immunol. 2004, 63: 11-21. 10.1016/j.jri.2004.04.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavine KJ, Ornitz DM: Fibroblast growth factors and Hedgehogs: at the heart of the epicardial signaling center. Trends Genet. 2008, 24: 33-40. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.10.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Izumi M, Pazin BJ, Minervini CF, Gerlach J, Ross MA, Stolz DB, Turner ME, Thompson RL, Miki T: Quantitative comparison of stem cell marker-positive cells in fetal and term human amnion. J Reprod Immunol. 2009, 81: 39-43. 10.1016/j.jri.2009.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Han YM, Romero R, Kim JS, Tarca AL, Kim SK, Draghici S, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Mittal P, Hassan SS, Kim CJ: Region-specific gene expression profiling: novel evidence for biological heterogeneity of the human amnion. Biol Reprod. 2008, 79: 954-961. 10.1095/biolreprod.108.069260.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miki T, Mitamura K, Ross MA, Stolz DB, Strom SC: Identification of stem cell marker-positive cells by immunofluorescence in term human amnion. J Reprod Immunol. 2007, 75: 91-96. 10.1016/j.jri.2007.03.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koyano S, Fukui A, Uchida S, Yamada K, Asashima M, Sakuragawa N: Synthesis and release of activin and noggin by cultured human amniotic epithelial cells. Dev Growth Differ. 2002, 44: 103-112. 10.1046/j.1440-169x.2002.00626.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Uberti MG, Pierpont YN, Ko F, Wright TE, Smith CA, Cruse CW, Robson MC, Payne WG: Amnion-derived cellular cytokine solution (ACCS) promotes migration of keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Ann Plast Surg. 2010, 64: 632-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyamoto K, Hayashi K, Suzuki T, Ichihara S, Yamada T, Kano Y, Yamabe T, Ito Y: Human placenta feeder layers support undifferentiated growth of primate embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2004, 22: 433-440. 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lai D, Cheng W, Liu T, Jiang L, Huang Q: Use of human amnion epithelial cells as a feeder layer to support undifferentiated growth of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells. 2009, 11: 331-340. 10.1089/clo.2008.0047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Scholer HR, Dressler GR, Balling R, Rohdewohld H, Gruss P: Oct-4: a germline-specific transcription factor mapping to the mouse t-complex. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 2185-2195.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosner MH, Vigano MA, Ozato K, Timmons PM, Poirier F, Rigby PW, Staudt LM: A POU-domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature. 1990, 345: 686-692. 10.1038/345686a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pesce M, Wang X, Wolgemuth DJ, Scholer H: Differential expression of the Oct-4 transcription factor during mouse germ cell differentiation. Mech Dev. 1998, 71: 89-98. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00002-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pesce M, Scholer HR: Oct-4: gatekeeper in the beginnings of mammalian development. Stem Cells. 2001, 19: 271-278. 10.1634/stemcells.19-4-271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Niwa H: Molecular mechanism to maintain stem cell renewal of ES cells. Cell Struct Funct. 2001, 26: 137-148. 10.1247/csf.26.137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hattori N, Nishino K, Ko YG, Hattori N, Ohgane J, Tanaka S, Shiota K: Epigenetic control of mouse Oct-4 gene expression in embryonic stem cells and trophoblast stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 17063-17069. 10.1074/jbc.M309002200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liedtke S, Stephan M, Kogler G: Oct4 expression revisited: potential pitfalls for data misinterpretation in stem cell research. Biol Chem. 2008, 389: 845-850. 10.1515/BC.2008.098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Takeda J, Seino S, Bell GI: Human Oct3 gene family: cDNA sequences, alternative splicing, gene organization, chromosomal location, and expression at low levels in adult tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20: 4613-4620. 10.1093/nar/20.17.4613.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cauffman G, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A, Van de Velde H: POU5F1 isoforms show different expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 2685-2691. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee J, Kim HK, Rho JY, Han YM, Kim J: The human OCT-4 isoforms differ in their ability to confer self-renewal. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 33554-33565. 10.1074/jbc.M603937200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lengner CJ, Camargo FD, Hochedlinger K, Welstead GG, Zaidi S, Gokhale S, Scholer HR, Tomilin A, Jaenisch R: Oct4 expression is not required for mouse somatic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell. 2007, 1: 403-415. 10.1016/j.stem.2007.07.020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamagawa T, Ishiwata I, Saito S: Establishment and characterization of a pluripotent stem cell line derived from human amniotic membranes and initiation of germ layers in vitro. Hum Cell. 2004, 17: 125-130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dobreva MP, Pereira PN, Deprest J, Zwijsen A: On the origin of amniotic stem cells: of mice and men. Int J Dev Biol. 2010, 54: 761-777. 10.1387/ijdb.092935md.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sakuragawa N, Thangavel R, Mizuguchi M, Hirasawa M, Kamo I: Expression of markers for both neuronal and glial cells in human amniotic epithelial cells. Neurosci Lett. 1996, 209: 9-12. 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12599-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ishii T, Ohsugi K, Nakamura S, Sato K, Hashimoto M, Mikoshiba K, Sakuragawa N: Gene expression of oligodendrocyte markers in human amniotic epithelial cells using neural cell-type-specific expression system. Neurosci Lett. 1999, 268: 131-134. 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00297-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Marcus AJ, Coyne TM, Black IB, Woodbury D: Fate of amnion-derived stem cells transplanted to the fetal rat brain: migration, survival and differentiation. J Cell Mol Med. 2008, 12: 1256-1264. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00180.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Jorjani M: Differentiation factors that influence neuronal markers expression in vitro from human amniotic epithelial cells. Eur Cell Mater. 2010, 19: 22-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodbury D, Kramer BC, Reynolds K, Marcus AJ, Coyne TM, Black IB: Long-term cryopreserved amniocytes retain proliferative capacity and diff erentiate to ectodermal and mesodermal derivatives in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006, 73: 1463-1472. 10.1002/mrd.20587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Orlacchio A, Bernardi G, Martino S: Stem cells: an overview of the current status of therapies for central and peripheral nervous system diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2010, 17: 595-608. 10.2174/092986710790416272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim SU, de Vellis J: Stem cell-based cell therapy in neurological diseases: a review. J Neurosci Res. 2009, 87: 2183-2200. 10.1002/jnr.22054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Arenas E: Towards stem cell replacement therapies for Parkinson's disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 396: 152-156. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Clarkson ED: Fetal tissue transplantation for patients with Parkinson's disease: a database of published clinical results. Drugs Aging. 2001, 18: 773-785. 10.2165/00002512-200118100-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Elwan MA: Synthesis of dopamine from L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine by human amniotic epithelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998, 354: R1-2. 10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00473-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kakishita K, Elwan MA, Nakao N, Itakura T, Sakuragawa N: Human amniotic epithelial cells produce dopamine and survive after implantation into the striatum of a rat model of Parkinson's disease: a potential source of donor for transplantation therapy. Exp Neurol. 2000, 165: 27-34. 10.1006/exnr.2000.7449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Uchida S, Inanaga Y, Kobayashi M, Hurukawa S, Araie M, Sakuragawa N: Neurotrophic function of conditioned medium from human amniotic epithelial cells. J Neurosci Res. 2000, 62: 585-590. 10.1002/1097-4547(20001115)62:4<585::AID-JNR13>3.0.CO;2-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Uchida S, Suzuki Y, Araie M, Kashiwagi K, Otori Y, Sakuragawa N: Factors secreted by human amniotic epithelial cells promote the survival of rat retinal ganglion cells. Neurosci Lett. 2003, 341: 1-4. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01454-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Meng XT, Chen D, Dong ZY, Liu JM: Enhanced neural differentiation of neural stem cells and neurite growth by amniotic epithelial cell co-culture. Cell Biol Int. 2007, 31: 691-698. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.11.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Meng XT, Li C, Dong ZY, Liu JM, Li W, Liu Y, Xue H, Chen D: Co-transplantation of bFGF-expressing amniotic epithelial cells and neural stem cells promotes functional recovery in spinal cord-injured rats. Cell Biol Int. 2008, 32: 1546-1558. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kakishita K, Nakao N, Sakuragawa N, Itakura T: Implantation of human amniotic epithelial cells prevents the degeneration of nigral dopamine neurons in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res. 2003, 980: 48-56. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02875-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Okawa H, Okuda O, Arai H, Sakuragawa N, Sato K: Amniotic epithelial cells transform into neuron-like cells in the ischemic brain. Neuroreport. 2001, 12: 4003-4007. 10.1097/00001756-200112210-00030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu T, Wu J, Huang Q, Hou Y, Jiang Z, Zang S, Guo L: Human amniotic epithelial cells ameliorate behavioral dysfunction and reduce infarct size in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model. Shock. 2008, 29: 603-611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Suh YH: Peripheral stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Paper presented at: 4th Annual Symposium on Regenerative Medicine and Adult Stem Cell Research;. 2010, ; Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  56. Fox IJ, Roy-Chowdhury J: Hepatocyte transplantation. J Hepatol. 2004, 40: 878-886. 10.1016/S0168-8278(04)00155-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Strom SC, Bruzzone P, Cai H, Ellis E, Lehmann T, Mitamura K, Miki T: Hepatocyte transplantation: clinical experience and potential for future use. Cell Transplant. 2006, 15 (Suppl 1): S105-110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hayek A: Cell replacement in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 18 (Suppl 1): 1157-1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Calne R: Cell transplantation for diabetes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005, 360: 1769-1774. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1707.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Davila JC, Cezar GG, Thiede M, Strom S, Miki T, Trosko J: Use and application of stem cells in toxicology. Toxicol Sci. 2004, 79: 214-223. 10.1093/toxsci/kfh100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sakuragawa N, Enosawa S, Ishii T, Thangavel R, Tashiro T, Okuyama T, Suzuki S: Human amniotic epithelial cells are promising transgene carriers for allogeneic cell transplantation into liver. J Hum Genet. 2000, 45: 171-176. 10.1007/s100380050205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Takashima S, Ise H, Zhao P, Akaike T, Nikaido T: Human amniotic epithelial cells possess hepatocyte-like characteristics and functions. Cell Struct Funct. 2004, 29: 73-84. 10.1247/csf.29.73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Miki T, Marongiu F, Ellis EC, Dorko K, Mitamura K, Ranade A, Gramignoli R, Davila J, Strom SC: Production of hepatocyte-like cells from human amnion. Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 481: 155-168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Manuelpillai U, Tchongue J, Lourensz D, Vaghjiani V, Samuel CS, Liu A, Williams ED, Sievert W: Transplantation of human amnion epithelial cells reduces hepatic fibrosis in immunocompetent CCl4-treated mice. Cell Transplant. 2010, 19: 1157-1168. 10.3727/096368910X504496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Nakajima T, Enosawa S, Mitani T, Li XK, Suzuki S, Amemiya H, Koiwai O, Sakuragawa N: Cytological examination of rat amniotic epithelial cells and cell transplantation to the liver. Cell Transplant. 2001, 10: 423-427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Takahashi N, Enosawa S, Mitani T, Lu H, Suzuki S, Amemiya H, Amano T, Sakuragawa N: Transplantation of amniotic epithelial cells into fetal rat liver by in utero manipulation. Cell Transplant. 2002, 11: 443-449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Marcus AJ, Coyne TM, Rauch J, Woodbury D, Black IB: Isolation, characterization, and diff erentiation of stem cells derived from the rat amniotic membrane. Differentiation. 2008, 76: 130-144. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00194.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wei JP, Zhang TS, Kawa S, Aizawa T, Ota M, Akaike T, Kato K, Konishi I, Nikaido T: Human amnion-isolated cells normalize blood glucose in streptozotocininduced diabetic mice. Cell Transplant. 2003, 12: 545-552.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Hou Y, Huang Q, Liu T, Guo L: Human amnion epithelial cells can be induced to differentiate into functional insulin-producing cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2008, 40 (9): 830-839. 10.1093/abbs/40.9.830.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Szukiewicz D, Pyzlak M, Stangret A, Rongies W, Maslinska D: Decrease in expression of histamine H2 receptors by human amniotic epithelial cells during differentiation into pancreatic beta-like cells. Inflamm Res. 2010, 59 (Suppl 2): S205-207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Moodley Y, Ilancheran S, Samuel C, Vaghjiani V, Atienza D, Williams ED, Jenkin G, Wallace E, Trounson A, Manuelpillai U: Human amnion epithelial cell transplantation abrogates lung fibrosis and augments repair. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 182: 643-651. 10.1164/rccm.201001-0014OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Moritoki Y, Ueno Y, Kanno N, Yamagiwa Y, Fukushima K, Gershwin ME, Shimosegawa T: Amniotic epithelial cell-derived cholangiocytes in experimental cholestatic ductal hyperplasia. Hepatol Res. 2007, 37: 286-294. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00049.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Fujimoto KL, Miki T, Liu LJ, Hashizume R, Strom SC, Wagner WR, Keller BB, Tobita K: Naive rat amnion-derived cell transplantation improved left ventricular function and reduced myocardial scar of postinfarcted heart. Cell Transplant. 2009, 18: 477-486. 10.3727/096368909788809785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Cargnoni A, Di Marcello M, Campagnol M, Nassuato C, Albertini A, Parolini O: Amniotic membrane patching promotes ischemic rat heart repair. Cell Transplant. 2009, 18: 1147-1159. 10.3727/096368909X12483162196764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Tsuji H, Miyoshi S, Ikegami Y, Hida N, Asada H, Togashi I, Suzuki J, Satake M, Nakamizo H, Tanaka M, Mori T, Segawa K, Nishiyama N, Inoue J, Makino H, Miyado K, Ogawa S, Yoshimura Y, Umezawa A: Xenografted human amniotic membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells are immunologically tolerated and transdifferentiated into cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2010, 106: 1613-1623. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.205260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Bailo M, Soncini M, Vertua E, Signoroni PB, Sanzone S, Lombardi G, Arienti D, Calamani F, Zatti D, Paul P, Albertini A, Zorzi F, Cavagnini A, Candotti F, Wengler GS, Parolini O: Engraftment potential of human amnion and chorion cells derived from term placenta. Transplantation. 2004, 78: 1439-1448. 10.1097/01.TP.0000144606.84234.49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Hori J, Wang M, Kamiya K, Takahashi H, Sakuragawa N: Immunological characteristics of amniotic epithelium. Cornea. 2006, 25: S53-58. 10.1097/01.ico.0000247214.31757.5c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kamiya K, Wang M, Uchida S, Amano S, Oshika T, Sakuragawa N, Hori J: Topical application of culture supernatant from human amniotic epithelial cells suppresses inflammatory reactions in cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2005, 80: 671-679. 10.1016/j.exer.2004.11.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Li H, Niederkorn JY, Neelam S, Mayhew E, Word RA, McCulley JP, Alizadeh H: Immunosuppressive factors secreted by human amniotic epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005, 46: 900-907. 10.1167/iovs.04-0495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ueta M, Kweon MN, Sano Y, Sotozono C, Yamada J, Koizumi N, Kiyono H, Kinoshita S: Immunosuppressive properties of human amniotic membrane for mixed lymphocyte reaction. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002, 129: 464-470. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01945.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wolbank S, Peterbauer A, Fahrner M, Hennerbichler S, van Griensven M, Stadler G, Redl H, Gabriel C: Dose-dependent immunomodulatory effect of human stem cells from amniotic membrane: a comparison with human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue. Tissue Eng. 2007, 13: 1173-1183. 10.1089/ten.2006.0313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Lefebvre S, Adrian F, Moreau P, Gourand L, Dausset J, Berrih-Aknin S, Carosella ED, Paul P: Modulation of HLA-G expression in human thymic and amniotic epithelial cells. Hum Immunol. 2000, 61: 1095-1101. 10.1016/S0198-8859(00)00192-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Hammer A, Hutter H, Blaschitz A, Mahnert W, Hartmann M, Uchanska-Ziegler B, Ziegler A, Dohr G: Amnion epithelial cells, in contrast to trophoblast cells, express all classical HLA class I molecules together with HLA-G. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997, 37: 161-171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Houlihan JM, Biro PA, Harper HM, Jenkinson HJ, Holmes CH: The human amnion is a site of MHC class Ib expression: evidence for the expression of HLA-E and HLA-G. J Immunol. 1995, 154: 5665-5674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Rooney IA, Morgan BP: Protection of human amniotic epithelial cells (HAEC) from complement-mediated lysis: expression on the cells of three complement inhibitory membrane proteins. Immunology. 1990, 71: 308-311.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Rooney IA, Morgan BP: Characterization of the membrane attack complex inhibitory protein CD59 antigen on human amniotic cells and in amniotic fluid. Immunology. 1992, 76: 541-547.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Surendran S: Possible role of fas antigen (CD 95) in human amniotic epithelial cell death: an in vitro study. Cell Biol Int. 2001, 25: 485-488. 10.1006/cbir.2000.0621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Kubo M, Sonoda Y, Muramatsu R, Usui M: Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001, 42: 1539-1546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Yeager AM, Singer HS, Buck JR, Matalon R, Brennan S, O'Toole SO, Moser HW: A therapeutic trial of amniotic epithelial cell implantation in patients with lysosomal storage diseases. Am J Med Genet. 1985, 22: 347-355. 10.1002/ajmg.1320220219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Scaggiante B, Pineschi A, Sustersich M, Andolina M, Agosti E, Romeo D: Successful therapy of Niemann-Pick disease by implantation of human amniotic membrane. Transplantation. 1987, 44: 59-61. 10.1097/00007890-198707000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Sakuragawa N, Yoshikawa H, Sasaki M: Amniotic tissue transplantation: clinical and biochemical evaluations for some lysosomal storage diseases. Brain Dev. 1992, 14: 7-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Akle CA, Adinolfi M, Welsh KI, Leibowitz S, McColl I: Immunogenicity of human amniotic epithelial cells after transplantation into volunteers. Lancet. 1981, 2: 1003-1005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Miura M, Miura Y, Padilla-Nash HM, Molinolo AA, Fu B, Patel V, Seo BM, Sonoyama W, Zheng JJ, Baker CC, Chen W, Ried T, Shi S: Accumulated chromosomal instability in murine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells leads to malignant transformation. Stem Cells. 2006, 24: 1095-1103. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Lane EL, Winkler C, Brundin P, Cenci MA: The impact of graft size on the development of dyskinesia following intrastriatal grafting of embryonic dopamine neurons in the rat. Neurobiol Dis. 2006, 22: 334-345. 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.11.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Olanow CW, Freeman T, Kordower J: Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2001, 345: 146-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Nakatsuji N, Nakajima F, Tokunaga K: HLA-haplotype banking and iPS cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2008, 26: 739-740. 10.1038/nbt0708-739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Serrano-Delgado VM, Novello-Garza B, Valdez-Martinez E: Ethical issues relating to the banking of umbilical cord blood in Mexico. BMC Med Ethics. 2009, 10: 12-10.1186/1472-6939-10-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2011