Open Access

Properties of internalization factors contributing to the uptake of extracellular DNA into tumor-initiating stem cells of mouse Krebs-2 cell line

  • Evgeniya V. Dolgova1Email author,
  • Ekaterina A. Potter1,
  • Anastasiya S. Proskurina1,
  • Alexandra M. Minkevich1,
  • Elena R. Chernych2,
  • Alexandr A. Ostanin2,
  • Yaroslav R. Efremov1, 3,
  • Sergey I. Bayborodin1,
  • Valeriy P. Nikolin1,
  • Nelly A. Popova1, 3,
  • Nikolay A. Kolchanov1 and
  • Sergey S. Bogachev1
Stem Cell Research & Therapy20167:76

Received: 16 February 2016

Accepted: 6 May 2016

Published: 25 May 2016



Previously, we demonstrated that poorly differentiated cells of various origins, including tumor-initiating stem cells present in the ascites form of mouse cancer cell line Krebs-2, are capable of naturally internalizing both linear double-stranded DNA and circular plasmid DNA.


The method of co-incubating Krebs-2 cells with extracellular plasmid DNA (pUC19) or TAMRA-5’-dUTP-labeled polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product was used. It was found that internalized plasmid DNA isolated from Krebs-2 can be transformed into competent Escherichia coli cells. Thus, the internalization processes taking place in the Krebs-2 cell subpopulation have been analyzed and compared, as assayed by E. coli colony formation assay (plasmid DNA) and cytofluorescence (TAMRA-DNA).


We showed that extracellular DNA both in the form of plasmid DNA and a PCR product is internalized by the same subpopulation of Krebs-2 cells. We found that the saturation threshold for Krebs-2 ascites cells is 0.5 μg DNA/106 cells. Supercoiled plasmid DNA, human high-molecular weight DNA, and 500 bp PCR fragments are internalized into the Krebs-2 tumor-initiating stem cells via distinct, non-competing internalization pathways. Under our experimental conditions, each cell may harbor 340–2600 copies of intact plasmid material, or up to 3.097 ± 0.044×106 plasmid copies (intact or not), as detected by quantitative PCR.


The internalization dynamics of extracellular DNA, copy number of the plasmids taken up by the cells, and competition between different types of double-stranded DNA upon internalization into tumor-initiating stem cells of mouse ascites Krebs-2 have been comprehensively analyzed. Investigation of the extracellular DNA internalization into tumor-initiating stem cells is an important part of understanding their properties and possible destruction mechanisms. For example, a TAMRA-labeled DNA probe may serve as an instrument to develop a target for the therapy of cancer, aiming at elimination of tumor stem cells, as well as developing a straightforward test system for the quantification of poorly differentiated cells, including tumor-initiating stem cells, in the bulk tumor sample (biopsy or surgery specimen).


Ascites Krebs-2 Extracellular DNA DNA internalization factors Tumor-initiating stem cells


Studies of DNA internalization by eukaryotic cells has become increasingly popular. It is well known that extracellular DNA (eDNA) can be directed into cells using transfection agents, such as lipofectamine and polyplexes [20, 37, 39]. However, eDNA has also been reported to become directly delivered to cells without the use of additional transfection tools [5, 11, 12, 14, 19, 34, 40]. Furthermore, upon internalization, eDNA sequences may become expressed [6, 14, 19].

Neither the exact mechanisms of how eDNA becomes internalized, nor the factors aiding in this process, have been comprehensively characterized. One mechanism established to mediate internalization of eDNA is endocytosis [2, 22]. In this scenario, eDNA molecules interact either with cell membrane components (adsorption endocytosis) or with appropriate cell receptors (receptor-mediated endocytosis) [28]. Experimental data are available showing that DNA molecules are transported into lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, and skeletal myocytes via interaction with cell surface proteins [4, 15, 18, 35, 40]. However, most of these DNA-binding cell surface proteins have received surprisingly little attention and so their exact role in the internalization process still remains obscure. It has also been demonstrated that short nucleic acid fragments can penetrate the cell interior using special channels [7, 17, 24, 30, 36].

Our earlier studies ([12, 33] and Krebs-2 transcriptome analysis (data not shown)) indicate that Krebs-2 cells capable of internalizing eDNA (TAMRA+ cells) display properties of tumor-initiating cancer stem cells. Notably, this property is also shared by clonogenic glioma [12], multiple myeloma, and lymphoma cells (data not shown).

Both linear double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and supercoiled plasmid DNA were shown to be taken up by Krebs-2 cells [12]. Whether these DNA species may compete with each other during internalization, and which mechanisms and factors are involved, is the focus of our research.

In the present paper, we describe internalization of pUC19 plasmid DNA by ascites cells of mouse cell line Krebs-2. We explore the efficiency of plasmid DNA internalization depending on its concentration in the medium and the incubation time. Next, we estimate whether various DNA species may competitively influence the internalization of each other (human dsDNA (0.3–6 kb) versus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment (0.5 kb) versus supercoiled plasmid DNA) upon co-incubation with Krebs-2 ascites cells.


Laboratory animals and tumor model

We used 2- to 3-month-old CBA/Lac mice bred in the animal facility at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Animals were grown in groups of 5–10 mice per cage with free access to food and water. The Ascites form of the mouse carcinoma Krebs-2 (derived from the solid form) was used as a model [21]. This cancer cell line was obtained from the cell depository of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics (Novosibirsk, Russia) and is maintained in mice as a transplanted tumor. To obtain ascites, Krebs-2 cells were diluted 1:10 in 200 μl normal saline and inoculated intraperitoneally (2 × 106 cells).

TAMRA labeling of human Alu repeat DNA and incubation of extracellular DNA with ascites Krebs-2 cells

DNA was labeled with TAMRA-5’-dUTP (N-90100, Biosan, Novosibirsk) using PCR. The PCR template was human Alu repeat material cloned in pBlueScript SK(+) (Alu-pBS), this repeat encompassing the tandemly repeated AluJ and AluY sequences (NCBI: AC002400.1, 53494–53767). Standard M13 primers were used for amplification. PCR purification was done by standard phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation using ammonium acetate as a salt. The quantity of eDNA being added to the cells (Alu-TAMRA DNA, pUC19 (#440060, Medigen, Novosibirsk), pEGFP-N1 (#6085-1, Clontech), sonicated pEGFP-N1) was 1 μg plasmid DNA/106 cells and 0.2 μg Alu-TAMRA DNA/106 cells. The cells that incorporated the fluorescently labeled DNA probe were analyzed by either FACS (BD FACSAria, Becton Dickinson) or by fluorescence microscopy (laser scanning microscope LSM 510 META (Zeiss), ZEN software or AxioImager ZI microscope (Zeiss), ISIS software).

Saturation of Krebs-2 cells with pUC19 plasmid DNA and estimates of the copy number of internalized pUC19

One million Krebs-2 cells were incubated for 1 h with pUC19 plasmid DNA (0.01; 0.1; 1; 5; 10; 20 μg). Next, to eliminate non-internalized DNA, the cells were treated with DNaseI (#18525, Serva) (10 μg/ml, 37 °С, 1 h), washed once with RPMI-1640 medium (#1.3.4, Biolot, St. Petersburg, Russia), and resuspended in 50 mM EDTA. SDS was added to a final concentration of 1 % and proteinase K (BIO-405010, Bioron GmbH, Germany) treatment (100 μg/ml) was performed at 58 °С for 1 h. Cell lysate was subjected to phenol-chloroform extraction, and the DNA was re-precipitated with 0.6 volumes of isopropanol, washed with 70 % ethanol and dissolved in water (15–40 μl). The DNA thus obtained was transformed into chemically competent XL1Blue MRF' E. coli cells. The cells were spread on agar-Amp plates. Colonies were counted, and this information was used to estimate plasmid copy number per cell. To verify that the transformed cells indeed carried the intended pUC19 plasmid, several individual colonies were grown in LB-Amp overnight. Plasmid DNA was purified and its identity was confirmed by gel electrophoresis.

Plasmid copy number estimate

The following input data were available to us: 1) E. coli transformation efficiency (transformation of 10 pg pUC19 plasmid DNA produced 200 colonies upon transformation); 2) 10 pg of pUC19 plasmid (2.9 kb) translates into 4.6 × 106 plasmid copies; 3) the number of colonies formed upon transformation of DNA isolated from Krebs-2 cells incubated with pUC19; 4) the percentage of DNA-internalizing cells among all Krebs-2 cells is 3 % on average. Thereby, we can estimate how many cells in fact internalize DNA—3 % of 1 million cells equals 3 × 104 cells,

Based on the proportion between 200 colonies and 4.6 × 106 plasmid molecules, and the known number of colonies obtained in the experimental point (N), one can estimate how many plasmid molecules were present (X). Therefore, each cell internalized on average X/3 × 104 plasmid molecules.

Analysis of co-internalization of pUC19 and Alu-TAMRA DNA by Krebs-2 ascites cells

The cells were incubated with a mixture of 1 μg pUC19 and 0.2 μg Alu-TAMRA DNA (per one million Krebs-2 cells). Following a single wash, TAMRA+ cells were sorted using BD FACSAria flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). Flow-sorted cells were subjected to all the treatments (starting from the DNaseI step) described in the above section of the Methods.

Analysis of competition between different types of eDNA

Alu-TAMRA DNA, pUC19 (see “TAMRA labeling of human Alu repeat DNA and incubation of extracellular DNA with ascites Krebs-2 cells” section above), and human dsDNA (300–6000 bp) were used. Human DNA was isolated from placentas of healthy women using a phenol-free method, and sonicated as described in [1].

Krebs-2 cells were incubated for 1 h with the first type of eDNA, according to the above protocol. Next the cells were washed once with RPMI-1640 and resuspended in this medium. The second type of DNA was either added immediately, or the cells were left at 37 °C in the medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS; SH30071.03, HyClone, USA) until the second type of DNA was added. After the incubation with the second type of eDNA, Krebs-2 cells were washed with medium and subjected to all the procedures described in the “TAMRA labeling of human Alu repeat DNA and incubation of extracellular DNA with ascites Krebs-2 cells” section above.

Cell cycle analysis of TAMRA+ and unsorted Krebs-2 cells

Sorted TAMRA+ or unsorted Krebs-2 cells were centrifuged at 400 g, 4 °С for 5 min, and fixed in 60 % methanol for 1 h at 4 °С. The cell suspension was pelleted, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and treated with 200 μg/ml RNase (LLC Samson-Med, St. Petersburg, Russia) for 30 min at 37 °С. Next, propidium iodide (P4170, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the cell suspension for 10 min at room temperature. Cell cycle profiling was performed using BD FACSAria flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

Quantitative PCR quantification of eDNA copy number in Krebs-2 cells

Isolation of DNA

Following incubation of Krebs-2 cells with eDNA and DNaseI treatment, the cell membrane was lysed with 0.5 % Triton-X100 (#37238, Serva) (15 min on ice). Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 200 g for 5 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and DNA was precipitated by adding 0.6 volumes of isopropanol. The pellets were re-dissolved in a small volume of water. Nuclear pellets were resuspended in 50 mM EDTA, SDS was added to 1 %, and samples were treated with proteinase K. DNA was purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and re-precipitated as described above.

Quantitative PCR and calibration curve

DNA molecules were quantified by real-time PCR using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (#4309155, Applied Biosystems, UK). To generate the quantitative PCR (qPCR) calibration curve, standard M13 primers or primers from the Amp gene (forward: 5’-ATGAGTATTCAACATTTCCG-3’; reverse: 5’-GATCTTACCGCTGTTGAGAT-3’) were used, and 0, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, 5000 and 50,000 pg of each pUC19 and Alu-repeat DNA were added to the reactions. Each concentration was run in triplicate. The linear fit of Ct versus eDNA content was plotted using StepOne Software v2.3. pUC19 and Alu DNA present in the nuclear or cytoplasmic fractions of Krebs-2 cells was quantified using StepOne Software v2.3. Template DNA (100 ng) was added to each qPCR reaction. DNA isolated from intact Krebs-2 cells was used as a negative control (and no product whatsoever was observed). All real-time PCR experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated twice on a Step One Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems).

Conversion of qPCR data into eDNA copy numbers

Calibration curve-based qPCR data were converted into absolute plasmid or Alu-repeat molecule numbers as follows: 100 ng of Krebs-2 DNA added to each qPCR equals ~8333 cells (12 pg/cell). Given than TAMRA+ cells were shown to be the same cells as those internalizing plasmid DNA, we could estimate the exact percentage of cells that internalized both types of eDNA. From fluorescence microscopy analysis, we know that 2 % of cells were eDNA-internalizing (i.e., ~167 cells). Hence, by dividing the eDNA copy number measured by 167, one obtains the number of eDNA molecules per cell.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 10 software. In the figures, bars show standard deviation (n = 3–4 at different experimental points). The level of significance was estimated using Students t tests.


Internalization of Alu-TAMRA dsDNA and supercoiled plasmid pUC19 DNA by Krebs-2 cells

Previously, passaging the ascites in a grafted form was demonstrated not to affect the ability of a subpopulation of ascites cells (tumor-initiating stem cells (TISCs)) to internalize extracellular dsDNA in the absence of additional transfection factors [12] (Fig. 1). The percentage of Krebs-2 cells that internalized Alu-TAMRA DNA has been analyzed by confocal microscopy and cytometry and was within the previously reported experimental range (1–7 %), namely 3 %. Performing the incubation of Krebs-2 cells with Alu-TAMRA DNA at 4 °С, 25 °С, or 37 °С did not influence the efficiency of internalization.
Fig. 1

Cytofluorescence (a) and flow cytometry (b) analyses of Alu-TAMRA DNA internalization by ascites Krebs-2 cells. DNA is stained with DAPI (blue); TAMRA (red) corresponds to Alu-TAMRA DNA

First and foremost, we wanted to understand whether Krebs-2 cells internalizing linear Alu-TAMRA DNA are the same cells that internalize supercoiled plasmid DNA. To do this, ascites Krebs-2 cells were co-incubated with TAMRA-labeled Alu DNA and supercoiled pUC19 plasmid DNA. The cells were flow-sorted into TAMRA-positive and -negative subpopulations. Their DNA was isolated and transformed into competent E. coli cells. Upon transformation, only TAMRA+ cells produced E. coli colonies. Plasmid DNA isolated from these colonies was identical to the original pUC19 plasmid, which was used for co-incubation experiments (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Analysis of plasmids isolated from the colonies obtained by transformation of competent E. coli cells with DNA from Krebs-2 ascites pre-incubated with different types of eDNA (pUC19 only or pUC19 + Alu-TAMRA dsDNA). a Krebs-2 ascites cells were incubated with a mixture of plasmid pUC19 DNA and linear Alu-TAMRA dsDNA. TAMRA+ and TAMRA– subpopulations were gated as shown. b Image of colony growth on an LB-amp plate seeded with E. coli cells transformed with DNA from TAMRA+ or TAMRA– Krebs-2 subpopulations. No colonies are formed in the latter group. c Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of the plasmids recovered. 1–4, Plasmids obtained from TAMRA+ material; 5, 6, plasmids obtained from the control transformation (Krebs-2 cells incubated with pUC19 DNA only); pUC19, Alu-pBS, original plasmids; 1 kb, DNA molecular weight 1 kb ladder. d Restriction analysis of plasmid DNA with a 4-cutter HaeIII. Plasmids derived from TAMRA+ cells (2, 3) correspond to pUC19, much as the plasmid (6) isolated from control Krebs-2 cells incubated with just pUC19

Copy number analysis of dsDNA molecules internalized by Krebs-2 TISCs

Selective targeting of TISCs by delivery of cell-killing genes carried on the plasmids is an attractive approach with a clear therapeutic application. For this approach to work, it is important to know whether non-degraded DNA molecules are delivered to the cells and how many native plasmid DNA molecules can be found in the cell at a time. To address these questions, two series of experiments were carried out. In the first series, we estimated the number of plasmid DNA molecules internalized by Krebs-2 cells by transformation of DNA from such cells into competent E. coli. Also, using an E. coli transformation assay, we determined the saturation threshold of Krebs-2 cells, which is 1 μg/106 cells (Fig. 3a). In the second series, the internalized plasmid DNA was quantified directly using qPCR. Importantly, unlike transformation, qPCR quantifies the entire pool of DNA molecules, regardless of whether they are nicked, partially degraded, or integrated into the genome or not. The results expectedly differ by three orders of magnitude: transformation experiments give an estimate from 340 (Fig. 3a) to 2600 (data not shown) plasmid copies/cell, with qPCR producing an estimate of 1.070 ± 0.054×106 copies/cell and 3.097 ± 0.044×106 copies/cell (Amp and M13 primer sets, respectively) (see Methods) (Fig. 3b-1). We also analyzed the copy number of Alu fragments internalized by the cells, which was 0.425 ± 0.011×106 (Fig. 3b-2). Additionally, we monitored the dynamics of Alu-TAMRA internalization by Krebs-2 TISCs. The cells become saturated with eDNA fragments by the end of the first hour of incubation. According to the confocal imaging analysis (data not shown), internalized labeled DNA material appears to double every 10 min.
Fig. 3

Copy number analysis of eDNA internalized by Krebs-2 cells. a saturation of Krebs-2 cells with increasing amounts of pUC19 DNA in the incubation medium. b qPCR quantification of pUC19 (1) and Alu DNA (2) present in Krebs-2 cells after co-incubation with eDNA. Linear calibration plot was constructed using StepOne v2.3 software; each datapoint was run in triplicate

Competitive interactions between human dsDNA, yeast RNA, bovine serum albumin, and heparin during internalization of pUC19 by Krebs-2 cells

Next, we proceeded to characterize possible competition between supercoiled plasmid DNA (pUC19) and linear DNA (fragmented human genomic DNA), total yeast RNA, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and heparin. Neither linear dsDNA (300–6000 bp), nor RNA, nor BSA compete with plasmid DNA for internalization factors (Fig. 4a, b and c). Amazingly, the addition of 10 U heparin (7.7 μg) abolished the internalization by Krebs-2 cells (Fig. 4d). In parallel, heparin was also demonstrated to abolish the uptake of Alu-TAMRA dsDNA by human mesenchymal stem cells (Fig. 4e).
Fig. 4

Internalization of supercoiled pUC19 plasmid DNA by Krebs-2 cells in the presence of various competitors. The relative internalization efficiency of pUC19 plasmid DNA in the presence of different amounts of human dsDNA (a), yeast RNA (b), bovine serum albumin (BSA) (c), and heparin (d). The values are shown on a log pUC19 (pUC19 + competitor) scale. e FACS analysis of Alu-TAMRA dsDNA internalization by human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the presence or absence of heparin. The data obtained suggest that heparin is a dose-dependent inhibitor of plasmid DNA internalization and suppresses linear DNA internalization by the cells. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; # p < 0.001

Competition between various eDNA types during internalization by Krebs-2 cells

Our earlier studies showed that internalization of extracellular DNA by human MCF-7 cells proceeds in two waves, and peaks at 1 and 3 h after the beginning of incubation [34]. In the present work, a series of experiments was performed to characterize the dynamics of eDNA internalization when Krebs-2 cells have been pre-incubated with various types of dsDNA. Specifically, one million Krebs-2 cells were incubated for 1 h with different dsDNA preparations. Next, additional DNA samples were added to the cells (once every hour, 3–4 h in total). To eliminate non-internalized DNA (unbound or membrane-associated DNA), the cells were finally treated with DNaseI. All experiments involved either pUC19 plasmid DNA or TAMRA-labeled human Alu repeat. These served as references for comparisons (E. coli transformation assay for pUC19, and flow cytometry for Alu-TAMRA). Several types of competition experiments were performed; each was run several times to achieve statistical significance. The following combinations were tested: pUC19 + pUC19 (Fig. 5), Alu-TAMRA + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 6a), pUC19 + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 6b), total human DNA + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 7a), and sonicated pEGFP-N1 + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 7b). The reasons for choosing these specific DNA combinations are explained below.
Fig. 5

Internalization of eDNA by Krebs-2 cells upon additional rounds of incubation. a Internalization of pUC19 plasmid was analyzed when this plasmid was added every 30 min (groups 2–6) following 1-h pre-incubation with 1 μg pUC19 (group 1). Shown is the total number of colonies obtained by transforming competent E. coli with DNA from 106 Krebs-2 cells incubated with pUC19 DNA; b representative image of E. coli colonies that formed as a result of transformation of DNA isolated from Krebs-2 cells that received additional pUC19 DNA 2.5 (group 5) and 3 h (group 6) after the pre-incubation step. Many more colonies are visible on the group 6 half of the plate; c FACS analysis of Alu-TAMRA dsDNA internalization by Krebs-2 cells 3 h following the pre-incubation with the same DNA; d fluorescence microscopy analysis of Krebs-2 cells pre-incubated with Alu-TAMRA DNA, followed by addition of Alu-FITC DNA. Cells internalizing fluorescent probes are marked with arrows; e cell cycle profiling of the total (unsorted) cell population (top), and TAMRA+ Krebs-2 cells (bottom). Percentages of cells found in G1, S, and G2/M phases are shaded in red

Fig. 6

Competition between Alu-TAMRA dsDNA and supercoiled pUC19 plasmid DNA for internalization into Krebs-2 cells. a Alu-TAMRA DNA is added 1 h after pre-incubation with the same DNA. b Alu-TAMRA DNA is added after pre-incubation with pUC19. 1a-5a, 1b-6b, Flow cytometry plots and schematics of each experimental point analyzed; 6a, 7b, percentage of TAMRA+ cells analyzed at each point. Baseline equals background level of fluorescence, i.e., either when no DNA was added (a), or when cells were incubated for 1 h with non-fluorescent plasmid DNA (b); upper limit represents percentage of TAMRA+ cells following incubation with Alu-TAMRA DNA

Fig. 7

Competition between Alu-TAMRA DNA and high-molecular weight human DNA or sonicated pEGFP-N1 plasmid for internalization into Krebs-2 cells. a Addition of Alu-TAMRA DNA to Krebs-2 cells pre-incubated with human dsDNA for 1 h; b addition of Alu-TAMRA DNA to Krebs-2 cells pre-incubated sonicated pEGFP-N1 plasmid DNA. FACS plots and schematics of the experimental points analyzed are shown; c bar plot summarizing the percentages of TAMRA+ cells. Baseline equals background fluorescence of untreated cells; control represents cells incubated for 1 h with 1 μg of either human dsDNA (blue) or sonicated pEGFP-N1 plasmid (red); upper limit represents percentage of TAMRA+ cells after 1 h incubation with 1 μg Alu-TAMRA DNA; d results of an agarose gel electrophoresis showing fragment size distributions of the three eDNAs tested. Brackets on the sides of the gel indicate average sizes of sonicated pEGFP-N1 (left) and human dsDNA (right) fragments. dsDNA double-stranded DNA

  1. 1.

    pUC19 + pUC19

    First, we wanted to confirm or challenge the existence of a second wave of internalization 3–4 h after the beginning of incubation, as was demonstrated for MCF-7 cells (see Methods). Indeed, we observed that adding more plasmid DNA 3–4 h following the incubation results in significantly more plasmids capable of forming colonies upon transformation into competent E. coli (Fig. 5a and b). This is formally compatible with two basic scenarios: either more internalization-competent cells become available with time, or more plasmid copies accumulate in the same cells. To understand which scenario is correct, fluorescently labeled DNA was included in the analysis (Alu-TAMRA). Using flow cytometry, we show that there is a 20 % gain in the TAMRA+ cell subpopulation (from 1.4 % to 1.7 %) when Alu-TAMRA DNA is added 3 h after beginning the first incubation (Fig. 5c-1). This observation is consistent with our earlier report [12] where the percentage of TAMRA+ cells was found to increase upon a longer incubation time (Fig. 5c-2). We performed an additional experiment wherein the cells were first incubated with Alu-TAMRA DNA, followed by Alu-FITC DNA 3 h later. The cells were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope. This analysis showed that the second portion of eDNA was largely absent from TAMRA+ cells, and is restricted to TAMRA cells (Fig. 5d-1). Cells that were double-positive for Alu-TAMRA and Alu-FITC (Fig. 5d-2) were present, but were rather rare. Taken together, these data suggest that 3–4 h following the beginning of the incubation there is a 13–50 % increase in the number of cells internalizing exogenous DNA.

    Next, we compared cell cycle distributions of unsorted cells and eDNA-internalizing cells (Fig. 5e). The two profiles were indistinguishable, with about 20 % of cells found in the G2-M phases. One can speculate that the cells undergoing mitosis are unlikely candidates for a cell-internalizing subpopulation. However, upon exiting the M phase such cells may become internalization-competent. The timing of the second wave of internalization events matches the length of the M phase, which is known to be 3–4 h. Data on the percentage of dividing cells and the increase in TAMRA+ subpopulation at a 4-h timepoint indicate that the increase in the plasmid copy number is attributable to the availability of an additional pool of internalization-competent cells that were undergoing mitosis and were incapable of internalizing DNA.

    Next, we aimed to address the question whether Alu-TAMRA PCR fragments and supercoiled DNA are internalized using the same factors or not. Two combinations of DNA were tested: Alu-TAMRA + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 6a) and pUC19 + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 6b). The first combination was necessary to control for the effect of the second wave of internalization. The second combination allowed estimating the contribution of both types of DNA into internalization, so as to understand whether internalization factors used for Alu-TAMRA and plasmid DNA are the same.

  2. 2.

    Alu-TAMRA + Alu-TAMRA

    When Krebs-2 cells are pre-incubated with Alu-TAMRA DNA and then additional portions of the same DNA are introduced, the pre-incubation step should saturate all the G1-S cells available and no increase in TAMRA-positive cells should be observed during the first 3–4 h. The increase in internalizing cells (about 20 %) should, however, be observed after the 3–4 h timepoint, which corresponds to the percentage of cells found in G2-M phases in the beginning of the experiment. Data obtained for Alu-TAMRA DNA appear similar to those obtained for the plasmid DNA, i.e., there is no internalization during the first 3 h and a second wave of internalization events follows immediately after (Fig. 6a 1–6). The plot shown in Fig. 6a indicates that the percentage of TAMRA+ cells remains unchanged at 1-h, 2-h, and 3-h timepoints (upper limit). However, it does increase some 13 % later on (from 2.6 % to 3.3 %) (Fig. 6a 2,5,6).

  3. 3.

    pUC19 + Alu-TAMRA

    Should the factor controlling internalization of Alu-TAMRA and plasmid DNA be the same, pre-incubation of Krebs-2 cells with plasmid DNA should prevent TAMRA+ cells from appearing following the incubation steps, and thus internalization above the “upper limit” should only become detectable 3–4 h after the beginning of the experiment. Alternatively, if internalization factors are different, incubation with Alu-TAMRA DNA should immediately result in a TAMRA+ cell subpopulation, with the percentage matching that of the control (Alu-TAMRA, 1 h).

    What we observed when testing this combination was that, following pre-incubation with pUC19, the percentage of Alu-TAMRA cells equaled the control level (as in Alu-TAMRA 1 h). After 4 h, the second wave of internalization occurs. No decrease in the percentage of Alu-TAMRA-internalizing cells was observed, when they were saturated by the pre-incubation with plasmid DNA (Fig. 6b 2,4,5). These results indicate that Krebs-2 cells use at least two distinct internalization pathways for the uptake of supercoiled plasmid DNA and linear TAMRA-labeled Alu DNA (500 bp) (Fig. 6b). The conclusions of these experiments are in line with co-incubation experiments using plasmid DNA and human dsDNA (300–6000 bp) showing lack of competition between the two species for internalization factors (Fig. 4a).

    The final experimental series was performed to estimate the competition between various types of linear DNA. Two combinations were selected: human DNA + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 7a), and sonicated pEGFP-N1 + Alu-TAMRA (Fig. 7b), and analyzed as above.

  4. 4.

    human DNA+ Alu-TAMRA

    Testing this combination helped address possible competition with human genomic DNA sonicated to the size of 300–6000 bp (as this DNA species was previously demonstrated to internalize into Krebs-2 TISCs [12]). The results obtained show that internalization factors for 300–6000 bp human DNA (hereafter referred to as high-molecular weight DNA) and human Alu repeat provided as a PCR fragment are distinct (Fig. 7a and c). We observed that there was partial competition between Alu DNA and sonicated human DNA for internalization factor(s), as demonstrated by the slight decrease in Alu-TAMRA-internalizing cells. This is likely attributable to the presence of trace amounts of DNA below 500 bp in the sonicated human DNA preparation, which serves as a competitor.

  5. 5.

    Sonicated pEGFP-N1 + Alu-TAMRA

    Use of this combination focused the analysis on the competition between DNA species similar in structure and size (Fig. 7d). Internalization of 500 bp Alu-TAMRA PCR product by Krebs-2 cells pre-incubated with sonicated pEGFP-N1 plasmid (<700 bp) was significantly suppressed, which suggests competition for the internalization factor (Fig. 7b and c).

    Taken together, our data suggest that supercoiled plasmid DNA reaches internal compartments of Krebs-2 TISCs essentially intact, given that functional plasmids can be recovered upon transformation into competent E. coli cells. Hence, it was interesting to test whether GFP could be expressed from the pEGFP-N1 plasmid internalized by Krebs-2 TISCs. Cells and the plasmid DNA were co-incubated for 1 h. Then incubation medium was replaced with a 10 % FBS-supplied medium, and cells were kept in the CO2 incubator for another 24 h. We ensured pEGFP-N1 plasmid was fully functional by incubating it with mouse fibroblasts. In the presence of lipofectamine, about 70 % of cells were scored GFP-positive. Two incubation protocols were tested for Krebs-2 TISCs, one including protamine, and one with protamine omitted. When plasmid DNA was pre-incubated with protamine, this resulted in a 17-fold increase in internalization efficiency. Notably, in neither protocol was any GFP fluorescence observed in Krebs-2 TISCs (Fig. 8a and b). Control experiments involving Alu-TAMRA DNA or Alu-TAMRA “pre-complexed” with protamine indicate that the percentage of DNA-internalizing cells remains unchanged (Fig. 8c). This argues for the existence of an additional internalization factor for DNA-protamine complexes.
    Fig. 8

    Internalization of protamine/extracellular DNA complexes by Krebs-2 cells. a Analysis of GFP fluorescence in Krebs-2 cells following incubation with pEGFP-N1 plasmid. DAPI represents chromatin (blue channel); FITC represents GFP (green channel, no signal). b Transformation of E. coli competent cells with DNA isolated from Krebs-2 cells incubated with pEGFP-N1 or pEGFP-N1/protamine complexes. c FACS analysis of Alu-TAMRA DNA/protamine internalization by Krebs-2 cells: 1: Negative control, intact Krebs-2 cells; 2: Krebs-2 + protamine; 3: Krebs-2 + Alu-TAMRA DNA; 4: Krebs-2 + Alu-TAMRA DNA/protamine complexes. Percentage values correspond to autofluorescence levels observed in the control and to the fraction of TAMRA+ cells at experimental points



In the present study, we performed comprehensive analysis of plasmid DNA internalization by Krebs-2 cells, and established several interesting aspects of competition between distinct DNA species upon internalization. To do so, we developed a special approach wherein Krebs-2 cells were first incubated or co-incubated with plasmid DNA; total DNA was isolated from such cells and used for transformation of competent E. coli cells. The rationale behind this approach is that it is important to analyze whether plasmid DNA can be used as a versatile vector to deliver cell-killing genes to TISCs. Efficiency of internalization was also assayed independently using qPCR.

About 3 % of mouse ascites Krebs-2 cells were shown to internalize eDNA, such as TAMRA-5’-dUTP human Alu DNA fragment (Fig. 1). Saturation of the cells by Alu DNA fragments was achieved during the first hour of incubation, and the quantity of internalized DNA material doubled every 10 min. The efficiency of internalization remained unaffected across a wide range of temperatures tested (4 °С, 25 °С, and 37 °С).

We demonstrate that internalization of dsDNA (500 bp) and supercoiled pUC19 plasmid DNA occurs in exactly the same tumor cells (Fig. 2). The cell saturation threshold with plasmid DNA was defined. When 1 μg plasmid DNA is co-incubated with 106 Krebs-2 cells, ascites cells cannot internalize more eDNA. Such cells encompass 340–2600 copies of the plasmid, depending on the transformation experiment, or up to 3.097 ± 0.044×106 molecules, as assayed by qPCR (Fig. 3). The approximate 1000-fold difference between the results obtained using these two quantification methods is explained by the distinct sensitivities of these approaches. The number of colonies obtained after transformation is affected by many parameters, such as the competence level of bacterial cells, sterical interactions of circular plasmid DNA with chromatin, association of cellular proteins with the internalized plasmids, and structural integrity of the plasmid. In contrast, these factors are of little importance when PCR quantification is used, as it only measures the number of target molecules delimited by the primer binding sites.

When eDNA is condensed by forming complexes with a positively charged protamine [9], this results in a 17-fold increase in internalization, with the percentage of DNA-internalizing cells remaining unchanged.

Experiments were performed to analyze possible competition between plasmid pUC19 and various forms of nucleic acids (human dsDNA (300–6000 bp), PCR fragment (500 bp), yeast RNA), as well as other agents (BSA, heparin) for internalization by Krebs-2 cells. Of these, only heparin worked as a potent inhibitor of internalization (Fig. 4). These observations are consistent with the idea that heparin interacts with the same internalization factor(s) as plasmid DNA. Heparin was reported to interact with a number of cell surface molecules, such as heparin binding protein and CAP37/azurocidin [16]. Bennett and colleagues showed that heparin and DNA molecules compete for binding to a 30-kDa protein in the context of lymphocyte membranes, whereas RNA, poly-dA/dT, or dNTP mix do not [3]. Also, heparin is known to interact with a family of fibroblast growth factor receptors [13]. Exosomes have been reported to contain dsDNA, and so their cargo can be easily internalized—in a process that is inhibited by heparin [8]. This could have pointed to the possible involvement of exosomes in eDNA internalization. We checked whether the TAMRA+ probe could be effluxed by Krebs-2 TISCs and observed that, upon internalization, the DNA did not leave the cells in any form, including exosomal (data not shown). This indicates that internalized DNA does not become part of exosomes, at least in the given context. The formal possibility that an exosome would internalize extracellular dsDNA appears rather unlikely, nor has such a property been reported in the literature. Given the above-described range of cell receptors bound by heparin and its property to inhibit eDNA internalization, one can expect that in the case of Krebs-2 cells these cell surface proteins are bona fide eDNA internalization factors.

Depending on the experiment, we observed increased internalization (13–50 %) of plasmid DNA 3 h after the beginning of incubation (Fig. 5). Formally, this observation is compatible with two scenarios. The first implies that internalization is mediated by specific cell receptors that shuttle back and forth between the cell surface and the cell interior [40]. The other relies on the greater availability of internalization-competent cells. We showed that TAMRA+ cells are the same cells as those internalizing plasmid DNA, and that their percentage ranges 1–3 % in our experiments. Under the first scenario, the percentage of Alu-TAMRA internalizing cells should remain unchanged at the 3- to 4-h timepoint; however, this was not the case, and more TAMRA+ cells were observed 3 h following the beginning of incubation (Fig. 5c). Thus, the second scenario appears the likeliest. Internalization of pUC19 translates into more colonies because more internalization-competent Krebs-2 cells become available, rather than because more plasmid copies are internalized.

Krebs-2 TISCs are not expected to internalize eDNA during mitosis, yet they become internalization-competent soon thereafter. Importantly, all other cells of this particular cell subpopulation already contain eDNA molecules. Thus, there should be a gain in DNA-internalizing cells that should be equal to the proportion of cells found in the G2-M phases in the beginning of the experiment, which in turn should translate into more E. coli colonies formed upon transformation. The cells that internalized DNA in G1 persist until mitosis, which explains why cell cycle profiling experiments failed to uncover significant accumulation of TAMRA+ cells in any of the cell cycle phases (Fig. 5a, c and e; [12]).

Finally, we tested competition between supercoiled plasmid DNA (pUC19), short PCR product (human Alu PCR fragment, 500 bp), sonicated pEGFP-N1 plasmid (100–700 bp), and larger-sized sonicated human dsDNA (300–6000 bp). If internalization factors for distinct types of DNA are the same, then saturating pre-treatment with one DNA species should block internalization of the other. Alternatively, should internalization factors be distinct, the second DNA type should be internalized regardless of the pre-treatment type of DNA. It turned out that pre-treatment with Alu PCR fragment abolishes subsequent internalization of Alu DNA and sonicated pEGFP-N1 by Krebs-2 cells (Figs. 6a and 7b). We attribute this to the fact that sonicated plasmid DNA is similar in size (100–700 bp) to Alu fragment (500 bp), thereby efficiently competing for binding to the receptor that mediates internalization of small (up to 500 bp) DNA fragments. The same was observed for plasmid DNA that blocked its own internalization. Efficiency of protamine-assisted eDNA internalization was also analyzed.

Pre-treatment of Krebs-2 cells with supercoiled plasmid DNA does not affect subsequent internalization of Alu PCR fragment (Fig. 6b). This is unlike pre-treatment with sonicated human dsDNA, which shows partial inhibition of Alu-TAMRA DNA internalization by Krebs-2 cells (Fig. 7a). We believe this partial inhibition is due to the presence of small amounts of low-molecular weight DNA fragments (<500 bp) in the preparation of sonicated human DNA (300–6000 bp). Most of the fragments in this preparation, however, are longer than 1 kb, and so they do not compete for binding to the internalization factor that mediates the uptake of fragments below 500 bp.

Biological meaning and clinical significance of the phenomenon observed

The phenomenon of internalization of extracellular dsDNA by stem cells (SCs) and TISCs is broadly related to the functioning of an organism as a single entity. We speculate that continuous flow of a highly dynamic set of extracellular DNA fragments through various SCs may function as a mechanism that helps such cells sense the genetic “image” of the body. Quantitative as well as qualitative changes among these eDNA molecules are interpreted by the multipotent cells as the clues setting the direction of differentiation.

Upon internalization and reaching the internal compartments of SCs and TISCs, eDNA may participate in many molecular processes. For instance, it is known that: 1) Any free dsDNA ends, including the ends of eDNA molecules, potently induce repair cascades [23, 29, 4143]. Our studies as well as other reports indicate that, upon internalization, linear plasmid DNA is partially digested at its termini and is ligated to form a circle [11, 25, 32, 34]. 2) When the cell is undergoing the repair of interstrand DNA crosslinks induced by an earlier treatment with a cytostatic drug, eDNA fragments delivered at this point into the cell interfere with nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination repair phases. In the context of murine CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), this results in the failure to give rise to lymphoid cell lineage [10], whereas Krebs-2 TISCs either die or become non-tumorigenic [33]. 3) When the cells repairing radiation-induced dsDNA breaks receive eDNA fragments, the latter interfere with the non-homologous end-joining step, yet HSCs are rescued from the aberrant recovery of chromosomal integrity and apoptosis. These surviving HSCs help repopulate the murine hematopoietic system, thereby protecting the animals from developing radiation sickness and death, and increasing the survival of lethally irradiated mice to 60–90 % [26]. Thus, “planting” eDNA to TISCs in a timely manner, when these cells are trying to repair the DNA, may potently interfere with the repair process, and so poorly differentiated cell types including TISCs either die or profoundly alter their properties. Clearly, this approach relies on fundamentally different principles of targeting SCs and TISCs. One of the most intriguing questions then is whether extracellular fragmented dsDNA may also target solitary cancer cells that give rise to metastases and which are known to be largely quiescent (and represent a form of TISCs). The very existence of these cells prompts for the careful analysis of many interesting questions related to cancer biology and therapy [31, 38]. In the absence of experimental data, we propose several ideas on the possible interplay between solitary cancer cells and fragmented dsDNA. First, these cells may be imagined not to internalize eDNA, and it is important to understand why poorly differentiated cells otherwise classifiable as TISCs fail to do so [12]. Alternatively, dormant cancer cells do internalize dsDNA, but whether their quiescence may prevent the fragmented DNA from efficiently interfering with the aforementioned molecular processes remains unclear. A number of so-called stress signals have been reported to induce proliferation of dormant cancer cells, which leads to the development of a metastasis [38]. dsDNA fragments internalized by solitary cancer cells may be viewed as a classical stress signal. Our work, as well as the data from other research groups, is consistent with the following scenario. Free ends of internalized dsDNA molecules launch a kinase cascade thereby leading to the cell cycle arrest and block of cell division [23, 25, 29, 32, 4143]. Our unpublished ex vivo studies indicate that dsDNA fragments are delivered into CD34+ HSCs, most of which are non-dividing, and paradoxically induce their proliferation. We speculate that stalling of the cell cycle prevents the HSC from reverting to the quiescent state, thereby forcing the dsDNA-activated cell to proliferate [27]. This scenario may point to the possibility that solitary cancer cells may be induced to proliferate by extracellular DNA fragments, which should translate into a clinically negative effect. Nevertheless, if dormant cancer cells do internalize eDNA this may well be used as a tool to selectively kill such cells, essentially in the same way as recently proposed [33]. Thus, our approach primarily targets poorly differentiated cell types including TISCs. Expression of a toxic protein or other protein of interest delivered to such cells in the form of DNA may be used to selectively alter their phenotype or eliminate them altogether.


Upon reaching the cell interior, eDNA molecules do not behave as an inert cargo. They are actively integrated in multiple on-going cellular processes and frequently compromise their correct progression. Additionally, extracellular DNA may also induce a number of cellular processes. Finally, the very property of dsDNA internalization may serve to develop a versatile approach to detect and target any type of poorly differentiated cells, such as TISCs.


Alu-TAMRA, human Alu repeat DNA labeled by the fluorescently modified nucleotide TAMRA-5’-dUTP; BSA, bovine serum albumin; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; eDNA, extracellular DNA; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; SC, stem cell; TISC, tumor-initiating stem cell.



The authors are thankful for the human dsDNA preparation to Natalya V. Yudina. The authors are grateful to Artem V. Kozel for assistance in pEGFP-N1/protamine experiments. The authors express their gratitude to Dr. Andrey Gorchakov for translating the paper, as well as to the Flow Cytometry and Microscopy Centers for Collective Use at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.


The work was funded by the LLC “BA-Pharma”, LLC “Panagen”, RFBR grant N 15-04-03386/16 and the State scientific project N 0324-2015-0003.

Availability of supporting data

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

EVD performed the analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. EAP, ASP, and AMM carried out the molecular studies. ERC participated in the design of the study. AAO performed the analysis and interpreted the data. YRE supervised work related with FACS. SIB directed the work on confocal microscopy. VPN and NAP carried out the mouse experiments, performed the analysis, and interpreted the data. NAK participated in the study coordination and provide the technical conditions for the performed works. SSB conceived the study, participated in its design, and coordinated and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed, critically revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (protocol #8, 19/03/2012).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Institute of Clinical Immunology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Novosibirsk State University


  1. Alyamkina EA, Dolgova EV, Likhacheva AS, Rogachev VA, Sebeleva TE, Nikolin VP, et al. Exogenous allogenic fragmented double-stranded DNA is internalized into human dendritic cells and enhances their allostimulatory activity. Cell Immunol. 2010;262:120–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amyere M, Mettlen M, Van Der Smissen P, Platek A, Payrastre B, Veithen A, et al. Origin, originality, functions, subversions and molecular signalling of macropinocytosis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002;291:487–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett RM, Gabor GT, Merritt MM. DNA binding to human leukocytes. Evidence for a receptor-mediated association, internalization, and degradation of DNA. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:2182–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett CB, Lewis AL, Baldwin KK, Resnick MA. Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:5613–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergsmedh A, Szeles A, Henriksson M, Bratt A, Folkman MJ, Spetz AL, et al. Horizontal transfer of oncogenes by uptake of apoptotic bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:6407–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergsmedh A, Szeles A, Spetz AL, Holmgren L. Loss of the p21(Cip1/Waf1) cyclin kinase inhibitor results in propagation of horizontally transferred DNA. Cancer Res. 2002;62(2):575–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Budker V, Budker T, Zhang G, Subbotin V, Loomis A, Wolff JA. Hypothesis: naked plasmid DNA is taken up by cells in vivo by a receptor-mediated process. J Gene Med. 2000;2:76–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Christianson HS, Svensson KJ, van Kuppevelt TH, Li J, Belting M. Cancer cell exosomes depend on cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans for their internalization and functional activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(43):17380–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolgova EV, Rogachev VA, Nikolin VP, Popova NA, Likhacheva AS, Aliamkina EA, et al. Leukocyte stimulation by DNA fragments shored up protamine in cyclophosphamide-induced leukopoiesis in mice. Vopr Onkol. 2009;55(6):761–64 [Article in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. Dolgova EV, Proskurina AS, Nikolin VP, Popova NA, Alyamkina EA, Orishchenko KE, et al. "Delayed death" phenomenon: a synergistic action of cyclophosphamide and exogenous DNA. Gene. 2012;495(2):134–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolgova EV, Efremov YR, Orishchenko KE, Andrushkevich OM, Alyamkina EA, Proskurina AS, et al. Delivery and processing of exogenous double-stranded DNA in mouse CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and their cell cycle changes upon combined treatment with cyclophosphamide and double-stranded DNA. Gene. 2013;528:74–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolgova EV, Alyamkina EA, Efremov YR, Nikolin VP, Popova NA, Tyrinova TV, et al. Identification of cancer stem cells and a strategy for their elimination. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;15:1378–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Fannon M, Forsten KE, Nugent MA. Potentiation and inhibition of bFGF binding by heparin: a model for regulation of cellular response. Biochemistry. 2000;39:1434–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Filaci G, Gerloni M, Rizzi M, Castiglioni P, Chang HD, Wheeler MC, et al. Spontaneous transgenesis of human B lymphocytes. Gene Ther. 2004;11:42–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gabor G, Bennett RM. Biotin-labelled DNA: a novel approach for the recognition of a DNA binding site on cell membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;122:1034–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gautam N, Olofsson AM, Herwald H, Iversen LF, Lundgren-Akerlund E, Hedqvist P, et al. Heparin-binding protein (HBP/CAP37): a missing link in neutrophil-evoked alteration of vascular permeability. Nat Med. 2001;7:1123–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanss B, Leal-Pinto E, Bruggeman LA, Copeland TD, Klotman PE. Identification and characterization of a cell membrane nucleic acid channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1921–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hefeneider SH, Bennett RM, Pham TQ, Cornell K, McCoy SL, Heinrich MC. Identification of a cell-surface DNA receptor and its association with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Invest Dermatol. 1990;94:79S–84S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Holmgren L, Szeles A, Rajnavölgyi E, Folkman J, Klein G, Ernberg I, et al. Horizontal transfer of DNA by the uptake of apoptotic bodies. Blood. 1999;93(11):3956–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kamiya H, Fujimura Y, Matsuoka I, Harashima H. Visualization of intracellular trafficking of exogenous DNA delivered by cationic liposomes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;298:591–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein G, Klein E. The transformation of a solid transplantable mouse carcinoma into an "ascites tumor". Cancer Res. 1951;11(6):466–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khalil IA, Kogure K, Akita H, Harashima H. Uptake pathways and subsequent intracellular trafficking in nonviral gene delivery. Pharmacol Rev. 2006;58:32–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumagai A, Dunphy WG. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell. 2000;6(4):839–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leal-Pinto E, Teixeira A, Tran B, Hanss B, Klotman PE. Presence of the nucleic acid channel in renal brush-border membranes: allosteric modulation by extracellular calcium. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;289(1):F97–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin J, Krishnaraj R, Kemp RG. Exogenous ATP enhances calcium influx in intact thymocytes. J Immunol. 1985;135(5):3403–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Likhacheva AS, Nikolin VP, Popova NA, Rogachev VA, Prokhorovich MA, Sebeleva TE, et al. Exogenous DNA can be captured by stem cells and be involved in their rescue from death after lethal-dose γ-radiation. Gene Ther Mol Biol. 2007;11:305–14.Google Scholar
  27. Likhacheva AS, Rogachev VA, Nicolin VP, Popova NA, Sebeleva TE, Strunkin DN, et al. Involvement of exogenous DNA in the molecular processes in somatic cell. Vestnik VOGiS. 2008;12(3):426–73 [Article in Russian].Google Scholar
  28. Loke SL, Stein CA, Zhang XH, Mori K, Nakanishi M, Subasinghe C, et al. Characterization of oligonucleotide transport into living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:3474–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. MacDougall CA, Byun TS, Van C, Yee MC, Cimprich KA. The structural determinants of checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 2007;21(8):898–903.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Munkonge FM, Dean DA, Hillery E, Griesenbach U, Alton EW. Emerging significance of plasmid DNA nuclear import in gene therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:749–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Páez D, Labonte MJ, Bohanes P, Zhang W, Benhanim L, Ning Y, et al. Cancer dormancy: a model of early dissemination and late cancer recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(3):645–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Perucho M, Hanahan D, Wigler M. Genetic and physical linkage of exogenous sequences in transformed cells. Cell. 1980;22(1 Pt 1):309–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Potter EA, Dolgova EV, Proskurina AS, Minkevich AM, Efremov YR, Taranov OS, Omigov VV, Nikolin VP, Popova NA, Bayborodin SI, Ostanin AA, Chernykh ER, Kolchanov NA, Shurdov MA, Bogachev SS. A strategy to eradicate well-developed Krebs-2 ascites in mice. Oncotarget. 2016. doi:
  34. Rogachev VA, Likhacheva A, Vratskikh O, Mechetina LV, Sebeleva TE, Bogachev SS, et al. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the extracellular DNA delivered to the nucleus of a living cell. Cancer Cell Int. 2006;6:23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Schubbert R, Renz D, Schmitz B, Doerfler W. Foreign (M13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes, spleen, and liver via the intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:961–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Shi F, Gounko NV, Wang X, Ronken E, Hoekstra D. In situ entry of oligonucleotides into brain cells can occur through a nucleic acid channel. Oligonucleotides. 2007;17:122–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vaughan EE, DeGiulio JV, Dean DA. Intracellular trafficking of plasmids for gene therapy: mechanisms of cytoplasmic movement and nuclear import. Curr Gene Ther. 2006;6:671–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Wan L, Pantel K, Kang Y. Tumor metastasis: moving new biological insights into the clinic. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1450–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilschut KJ, van der Aa MA, Oosting RS, Hennink WE, Koning GA, Crommelin DJ, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization to monitor the intracellular location and accessibility of plasmid DNA delivered by cationic polymer-based gene carriers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(2):391–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yakubov LA, Deeva EA, Zarytova VF, Ivanova EM, Ryte AS, Yurchenko LV, et al. Mechanism of oligonucleotide uptake by cells: involvement of specific receptors? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;87:6454–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Yoo HY, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Dunphy WG. Mcm2 is a direct substrate of ATM and ATR during DNA damage and DNA replication checkpoint responses. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(51):53353–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yoo HY, Jeong SY, Dunphy WG. Site-specific phosphorylation of a checkpoint mediator protein controls its responses to different DNAstructures. Genes Dev. 2006;20(7):772–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Zou L. Single- and double-stranded DNA: building a trigger of ATR-mediated DNA damage response. Genes Dev. 2007;21(8):879–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Dolgova et al. 2016