Skip to main content

Advertisement

The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity on muscle progenitor cell function

Article metrics

Abstract

In addition to its primary function to provide movement and maintain posture, the skeletal muscle plays important roles in energy and glucose metabolism. In healthy humans, skeletal muscle is the major site for postprandial glucose uptake and impairment of this process contributes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A key component to the maintenance of skeletal muscle integrity and plasticity is the presence of muscle progenitor cells, including satellite cells, fibroadipogenic progenitors, and some interstitial progenitor cells associated with vessels (myo-endothelial cells, pericytes, and mesoangioblasts). In this review, we aim to discuss the emerging concepts related to these progenitor cells, focusing on the identification and characterization of distinct progenitor cell populations, and the impact of obesity and T2DM on these cells. The recent advances in stem cell therapies by targeting diabetic and obese muscle are also discussed.

Background

The incidence of overweight has been increasing dramatically worldwide due to increased uptake of high-calorie food, lack of physical activity, and genetic predisposition. Accordingly, obesity and its associated metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have become an epidemic health threat and economic burden [1]. According to a recent study, by 2025, global obesity prevalence is expected to reach 18% in men and surpass 21% in women [2]. From 1980 to 2014, global age-standardized diabetes prevalence increased from 4.3 to 9.0% in men and from 5.0 to 7.9% in women [3]. Both genetic and environmental factors play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of T2DM, among them obesity is a major risk factor—around 50% of obese subjects will develop T2DM at some stage [4]. While insulin resistance in peripheral tissues is often an early sign of developing diabetes, pancreatic β cell function is damaged gradually during disease progression. Over time chronic hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia impair cellular functions, which eventually lead to various complications including diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, diabetic foot, and cardiovascular diseases [4].

A major metabolic defect associated with T2DM is the failure of proper glucose utilization by peripheral tissues such as skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, the primary targets of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. In healthy humans, 70–80% of glucose uptake occurs in skeletal muscle in the postprandial state through both insulin-dependent phosphoinositide-3-kinase-protein kinase B (PI3K-PKB/AKT) pathway and insulin-independent glucose-stimulated Baf60c-Deptor-AKT pathway [5, 6]. Moreover, studies of genetically predisposed individuals indicate that insulin resistance in muscle is the primary or initiating defect leading to the ultimate development of T2DM [7, 8]. Skeletal muscle not only plays an important role in the pathogenesis of T2DM but also undergoes significant structural, metabolic, and functional changes under obese and diabetic conditions, such as muscle atrophy [9, 10], fiber-type transition [11], impaired glucose uptake [12], glycogen synthesis [13, 14], fatty acid oxidation [15], and altered myokine secretion [16, 17], which ultimately lead to muscle weakness and poor exercise performance.

Many of the morphological features of muscle atrophy resemble those seen in sarcopenia, an age-associated loss of skeletal muscle mass and function [18]. Both muscle atrophy and sarcopenia are characterized by a decrease in myofiber size and muscle mass, and the ensuing loss of muscle strength. Loss of appendicular lean mass and reduced skeletal muscle strength are commonly observed in T2DM patients despite gender and ethnicity and the incidence increases with aging [19, 20]. It is estimated that sarcopenia is present in about 5 to 10 % of persons over 65 years of age [21], whereas the T2DM patients have two to three times higher prevalence of sarcopenia than non-diabetic individuals [22, 23] due to glucose toxicity, insulin resistance, and oxidative stress [21]. In addition, intermuscular adipose tissue infiltration is increased in persons with obesity, diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy [24]. This ectopic fat accumulation is associated with impaired muscle function and forms the basis of obese sarcopenia [24].

A key component to the maintenance of skeletal muscle integrity and plasticity is the presence of muscle progenitor cells, including satellite cells, fibroadipogenic progenitors, myo-endothelial cells, and other interstitial progenitor cells [25,26,27,28,29]. These heterogenous groups of cells are endowed with multilineage developmental potential and may contribute to the pathogenesis as well as the treatment of muscle diseases.

Accumulating evidence indicates that diabetic and obese conditions not only cause dramatic structural, metabolic and functional changes of skeletal muscle fibers but also display detrimental effects on these progenitor cells [30, 31]. Therefore, fully characterization of distinct progenitor cell populations and understanding the impact of aging, obesity, and T2DM on these cells will aid to extend our understanding of these health conditions and shed light on developing novel therapeutic interventions.

Effect of T2DM and obesity on skeletal muscle stem cell—satellite cell

Satellite cell discovery and function

The satellite cell was first identified by transmission electron microscopy on frog muscle and named after its anatomical localization: mononuclear cell wedged between basal lamina and the plasma membrane of myofiber, like a “satellite” cell “orbiting” the muscle fiber when viewed in cross-section [25]. Shortly afterwards, the satellite cell was found in other vertebrates including human [32]. Subsequent studies proved that satellite cells are capable of proliferation and myogenic differentiation in vitro and in vivo [33, 34]. Recent studies further demonstrated the self-renewal capacity of satellite cells after transplantation [35, 36]. All these data qualify satellite cells as skeletal muscle-specific stem cells.

Identification of the paired-box transcriptional factor Pax7 being specifically expressed in satellite cells enables researchers to use Pax7 lineage tracing to study the satellite cell function [37]. Accumulated data from Pax7 expressing cells indicate that the satellite cell population serves as a major contributor to the postnatal muscle growth and repair after injury or disease [38, 39]. In adulthood, satellite cells remain quiescent under normal conditions. Upon injury or in diseased states, satellite cells are reactivated, proliferating to generate a pool of myoblasts, which then differentiate and fuse with damaged fibers or fuse with each other to generate entirely new myofibers. Meanwhile, some myoblasts remain undifferentiated and return to the quiescent state to replenish the satellite cell pool. During muscle development and regeneration, myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) Myf5, MyoD, MRF4, and myogenin are activated for entry of satellite cells into the myogenic program [40]. The importance of satellite cells for muscle regeneration is reinforced by genetic ablation of Pax7 expressing cells after acute injury. Lepper and colleagues found that such elimination completely blocked muscle regeneration, thus verified that satellite cells, as adult stem cells, are indispensable for acute injury-induced muscle regeneration [39].

The proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells are attenuated in diabetic muscles

The impairment of muscle regeneration was observed in animal studies under hyperglycemia and/or lipotoxicity conditions, but the detailed changes especially alterations of satellite cells vary from study to study, and some results are even conflicting (Table 1). Using a mouse model of insulin resistance achieved by high-fat diet (HFD) feeding for 8 months, Hu et al. observed smaller regenerating myofibers plus more collagen deposition after cardiotoxin injury [30]. However, satellite cell activation or proliferation was intact as assessed by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; an analog of the nucleoside thymidine) incorporation and by the expression of myogenic transcription factors. Instead, the deficits in muscle regeneration were principally related to increased expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), which reduced phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) in muscle, inhibited AKT signaling, and impaired myofiber maturation [30].

Table 1 Effect of insulin resistance on skeletal muscle development and regeneration in animal models

On the other hand, HFD-feeding 3-week-old mice for just 3 weeks resulted in overweight, decreased satellite cell content and muscle mass, and reduced regenerative capability [41]. In another study, HFD-feeding 4-week-old mice for 6 weeks led to delayed myofiber regeneration due to attenuated satellite cell proliferation even though satellite cell content remained unchanged [42]. In agreement with these reports, Fu et al. showed that C57BL/6 mice fed with a 60% HFD for 3 months became obese and muscle injury induced by cardiotoxin resulted in impeded satellite cell activation and proliferation, and fewer regenerated fiber formation in obese mice [43]. Further analysis revealed that decreased 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) α1 activity in satellite cells accounted for the impaired muscle regeneration [43].

The Obese Zucker rat (OZR), a model of metabolic syndrome resulted from a homozygous missense mutation of the leptin receptor gene [44], displays smaller skeletal muscle size than the Lean Zucker rat (LZR) [45]. This defect has been attributed to a significant decrease in satellite cell proliferative capacity though the proportion of quiescent satellite cells remained unchanged. However, compensatory loading on OZR muscle can restore satellite cell proliferation, Akt signaling, MyoD, and myogenin expression [45]. In contrast, Scarda et al. demonstrated that satellite cells isolated from OZR did not show any difference in terms of proliferation rate and differentiation potential compared to their lean littermates [46]. Taken into consideration that increased protein degradation has also been shown to contribute to muscle atrophy in OZR [47], future studies are necessary to delineate the precise underlying mechanisms. Of note, one major machinery in this setting is the ubiquitin-proteosome system. The two major ubiquitin ligases Atrogin1 (also known as MAFbx or FBXO32) and muscle ring-finger protein-1 (MuRF1) are both upregulated in diabetic and obese-induced atrophy muscle [10]. Atrogin1 targets MyoD and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F (eIF3-f) for protein degradation [48, 49], whereas MuRF1 induces degradation of a group of proteins important for maintaining sarcomere integrity such as actin, telethonin, myosin light, and heavy chains [50,51,52]. More detailed cellular and molecular mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy and sarcopenia have been exquisitely reviewed elsewhere [53].

Ob/ob and db/db mice have mutations in the genes encoding leptin and the leptin receptor, respectively. They are obese and diabetic and are well-characterized models for type 2 diabetes [54]. Following cardiotoxin injury, both ob/ob and db/db mice showed impaired muscle cell proliferation, decreased myoblast accumulation, and delayed muscle regeneration [55]. In comparison, such changes were not seen in 3-month-old HFD-fed diabetic and obese mouse, which is a less severe model of insulin resistance [55]. The above-mentioned disparities are possibly due to genetic model difference, variations in HFD composition and diet length, and type of analysis performed (Table 1). Moreover, severity of insulin resistance, inflammatory response, fiber-type transition, glucose and fatty acid metabolic changes etc., though unelucidated, could have an impact on the regenerative process and satellite cell functionality. Thus, further investigations are needed to clarify this issue.

In addition to the reduced myogenic potential, satellite cells isolated from T2DM patients maintained other diabetic phenotypes during in vitro culture, such as impaired glucose uptake, decreased glycogen synthesis, reduced fatty acid oxidation, and increased inflammatory response and insulin resistance [12, 56, 57]. These results indicate that the insulin-resistant phenotype is intrinsic to muscle satellite cells and justify the use of satellite cell culture as a tool to study regulatory mechanisms in obesity and T2DM in humans ex vivo.

Skeletal muscle is gaining recognition as an endocrine organ capable of synthesis and secretion of myokines. Human skeletal muscle satellite cells obtained from T2DM subjects were differentiated into myotubes, which secreted elevated amount of myokines including IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, TNFα, follistatin, and monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 compared to control myotubes [17]. These secreted factors may have impact on multiple tissues and contribute to the development of diabetic phenotypes. A complete analysis of secretomes between T2DM and normal myotubes may identify more aberrantly secreted myokines as shown by proteomic studies performed in palmitate-induced insulin-resistant muscle cell lines [58, 59].

Transdifferentiation of satellite cells in obese and diabetic conditions

Satellite cells have been reported to be multipotent and can differentiate into myocytes, adipocytes, and osteocytes in vitro [60,61,62]. Adipogenic differentiation can be induced by inhibition of Wnt signaling [63], high oxygen pressure [64], and growth in adipogenic media [61] and can be enhanced in aged muscle [65]. In line with these findings, satellite cells of obese animals displayed an enhanced adipogenesis under adipogenic conditions that may result from Wnt10b downregulation [46]. Similarly, high-glucose exposure in vitro induced adipogenic differentiation of muscle-derived stem cells including satellite cells [66].

More recently, satellite cell transdifferentiation capacity to adipocyte was analyzed using the Cre-loxP system for lineage tracing with the cre gene driven by the MyoD promoter. MyoDCre-labeled cells (EYFPpos) derived from MyoDCre:R26REYFP skeletal muscle represent 98% of Pax7pos satellite cells [67]. However, these EYFPpos cells do not spontaneously adopt an adipogenic fate. Under adipogenesis-inducing conditions, EYFPpos satellite cells accumulated cytoplasmic lipid but maintained myogenic protein expression and did not undergo complete adipogenic differentiation [68], suggesting that these adipocyte-like cells are not intrinsic adipocytes. Consistent with this finding, satellite cell transition to adipocyte-like cell was also demonstrated when Lkb1 gene was specifically knocked out in MyoD progenitors, in which myogenic gene expression was not downregulated [69]. Nevertheless, Lkb1-null myofibers accumulated excessive lipids in vivo in response to HFD feeding, suggesting that alterations in lipid metabolism in satellite cells could lead to physiological consequences in the adult muscle [69]. In this regard, excessive lipid accumulation in satellite cells derived from obese animals or cultured under high glucose conditions probably reflects a metabolic adaptation rather than a cell identity switch to adipocytes. Taken together, the in vivo lineage analysis of satellite cell fate under obese/diabetic conditions will further clarify its adipogenic potential.

Accumulating evidence reveals that high intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content is associated with insulin resistance in aging [70], T2DM [71], and obesity [72]. Paradoxically, elite endurance athletes, who possess high insulin sensitivity, have similar IMCL levels as insulin-resistant obese or T2DM subjects [73]. It is not yet clear which underlying mechanism explains this paradox, but the lipid composition, metabolites and associated proteins may affect the relationship between IMCL and insulin sensitivity [74]. Nevertheless, moderate exercise training in obese older adults can improve insulin sensitivity and enhance muscle oxidative capacity in conjunction with favorable lipid repartitioning [75].

Effect of T2DM and obesity on skeletal muscle interstitial progenitor cells

Muscle-resident interstitial progenitor cells often possess multipotent differentiation ability, and many of them (that we will discuss further below) have myogenic differentiation ability that endowing them with therapeutic potential. It is of note that fibroadipogenic progenitors are not myogenic, and they account for the fatty degeneration of the diabetic/obese muscle. Nevertheless, these interstitial progenitors can coordinate with each other or with satellite cells to play important roles in muscle repair. Understanding how T2DM and obesity affect these progenitor cells will help developing strategies against muscle wasting and dysfunction in this setting.

Fibroadipogenic progenitors (FAPs)

Excessive intermuscular fat deposition is observed in obese, diabetic, dystrophic, and aging animals and patients and associates with insulin resistance, loss of muscle strength, and other impaired physical functions [31, 76]. To clarify the origin of cell populations account for the fatty degeneration of skeletal muscle, two groups employed fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and identified very similar platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα)pos interstitial cell population, termed fibroadipogenic progenitors (FAPs) [26, 27]. These cells have the potential to produce both fibroblasts and adipocytes but failed to differentiate into myogenic cells [77, 78]. The fate of FAPs in vivo is largely dependent on the environment. Under resting and normal regenerating conditions, FAPs are quiescent and proliferating yet remain undifferentiated, respectively. In both cases, interaction with intact myofiber or adequate proliferating myoblasts or myo-endothelial cells prevents FAPs differentiation into adipocytes (Fig. 1) [26, 79]. Conversely, FAPs gave rise to ectopic white fat when delivered subcutaneously or intramuscularly in a model of fatty infiltration such as glycerol injection [26, 27], or under Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) conditions with severe satellite cell damage [80], or in type 2 diabetic KKAy and obese mice after cardiotoxin-induced injury [76]. Profibrotic cytokines TGFβ and PDGF could stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of FAPs to fibrogenic cells in vitro, and transplanted FAPs solely give rise to collagen type I-producing cells (fibroblasts) in the gamma radiation-induced muscle fibrosis model [77].

Fig. 1
figure1

Illustration of the mechanisms for the adipogenic fate determination of FAP in skeletal muscle. Eosinophils infiltrate early during muscle injury, secrete IL-4/IL-13, and subsequently stimulate STAT6 to promote FAP proliferation, while inhibiting its adipogenic differentiation. Activation of Hh signaling also prevents the conversion of FAP to adipocyte. Meanwhile, the direct interaction of FAP with intact myofiber or myo-endothelial cell can prevent its differentiation into adipocyte at resting state. Upon muscle damage, FAPs proliferate dramatically to help debris clearance and induce myogenic cell differentiation. FAP, fibroadipogenic progenitor; STAT6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 6; Hh, hedgehog; TIMP3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3; MMP14, matrix metallopeptidase 14

The mechanisms for the adipogenic fate determination of FAP are not fully elucidated and may involve multiple signaling pathways. Upon muscle injury, eosinophils are recruited to the injured site, secreting IL-4 and IL-13. These inflammatory signals act through IL-4Rα to stimulate signal transducer of transcription 6 (STAT6), which promotes FAP proliferation, whereas inhibits its differentiation into adipocytes [81]. Hedgehog (Hh) signaling has also been shown to inhibit adipogenesis of both pre-adipocytes and FAPs [82, 83]. The newly identified downstream target in this setting is tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP3), a secreted metalloproteinase inhibitor, that specifically inhibits matrix metallopeptidase 14 (MMP14) to prevent adipogenesis of FAP [83] (Fig. 1).

FAPs also exhibit osteogenic potential upon stimulation with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) ligands [26] and have recently been shown to be a major cell origin of heterotopic ossification (HO; extraskeletal bone formation) in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) mouse muscles [84, 85]. Activin A receptor type I (ACVR1) is a BMP type I receptor, and a missense mutation in the glycine-serine activation domain of ACVR1 (R206H) is the underlying cause of FOP [86]. After global postnatal induction of mutated ACVR1 in ACVR1R206H/+ transgenic [87] and knock-in mice [88, 89], HO is formed in the skeletal muscle of activin A administration sites [87, 88], or cardiotoxin injury sites [89], or even spontaneously in mirroring sites that commonly ossify in FOP patients [88, 89]. The non-genetic forms of HO are particularly common among patients with traumatic injuries, burn injury, and soft tissue damage [90]. The incidence of HO was reported to be over 60% in a cohort of combat-injured patients [90]. Whether FAPs contribute to HO in this setting remains to be elucidated, nevertheless, FAP may represent a potential target for cell-based therapy for FOP.

FAPs play pivotal roles in maintaining muscle homeostasis and promoting muscle regeneration in vivo. Upon muscle damage, FAPs proliferate dramatically in the first three days, exhibit around tenfold increase of IL-6 expression, and induce myogenic cell differentiation [27]. A study by Mozzetta et al. further explored FAP regulation of myogenesis in young and old mdx mice. Ex vivo co-culture and in vivo co-transplantation of FAPs and satellite cells showed that FAPs derived from young but not old mdx muscle enhanced adjacent satellite cell differentiation. In addition, the progressive loss of satellite cell regenerative capacity was partially attributed to paracrine reduction of follistatin by FAP in old mdx muscle [91]. Of note, paracrine action of IL-6 and follistatin has been implicated in myoblast differentiation [92, 93]. The functions performed by FAPs are not restricted to supporting myogenesis. Heredia et al. affirmed that muscle damage stimulated FAP proliferation in vivo via IL-4 signaling, and FAPs were capable of phagocytizing necrotic cellular debris in regenerating muscle [81]. Finally, muscle-specific ablation of adipocyte protein 2 (ap2, a.k.a. fatty acid binding protein 4; FABP4) lineage cells, which predominantly give rise to FAPs, leads to dramatic inhibition of myogenic differentiation, reduction of regenerating myofiber number and size in cardiotoxin-injured muscle [94]. Similarly, conditional ablation of Tcf4 lineage fibroblasts, which largely overlap with FAPs in skeletal muscle, results in impaired muscle regeneration with premature satellite cell differentiation, depletion of the satellite cell pool and smaller regenerating myofibers [95]. Collectively, these data further support the notion that FAPs are required for muscle regeneration.

Human putative FAPs were identified in muscle interstitium and could be isolated using several cell surface markers including PDGFRα, which identifies both mouse and human FAPs (Table 2) [96,97,98]. Human FAPs possess fibrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic capacities and in DMD patients FAPs contribute to both pre-adipocytes expressing PPARγ and fibroblasts expressing collagen I. Moreover, the number of PDGFRαpos cells positively correlates with the severity of fibrosis, demonstrating the pathophysiological importance of this cell population [96].

Table 2 Major skeletal muscle-resident cell populations

The origin of ectopic adipocytes in diabetic and obese muscle has been investigated recently. Studies from T2DM mice KKAy, db/db, and HFD-fed obese mice showed that ectopic adipocytes accumulated in lower limb were derived from PDGFRαpos progenitors [76]. In agreement with this, adipogenic progenitors from obese human skeletal muscle can be isolated from CD56negCD15pos cellular fraction [99], which is equivalent to PDGFRαpos FAPs [97]. Mature adipocytes derived from muscle FAPs exhibited the phenotype, molecular characteristics, and metabolic properties of white adipocytes. However, these FAP-derived adipocytes were insensitive to insulin signaling, as indicated by lack of phosphorylation of insulin receptor, its downstream targets insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), AKT, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and inhibition of stimulated glucose uptake [97]. Furthermore, human primary myotubes cultured with conditioned media from CD56negCD15pos adipocytes of obese muscle displayed significant reduction of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, glycogen synthesis, and glucose oxidation, indicating paracrine factors secreted from FAP-derived adipocytes negatively regulate insulin action in skeletal muscle cells [99]. Future studies should focus on identifying these bioactive molecules.

Since the characterization of FAPs in skeletal muscle several years ago, FAPs gradually emerged as novel targets for treating muscle disorders. For example, imatinib, a tyrosine kinase receptor (including PDGFRα) inhibitor, has been shown to inhibit proliferation and fibrotic differentiation of FAPs via blocking PDGF signaling, resulting in amelioration of the muscular pathology in severe muscular dystrophy mice [100]. Moreover, Cordani and colleagues revealed nitric oxide prevented adipogenic differentiation of FAPs in dystrophic muscle via elevation of miR-27b expression and downregulation of PPARγ expression [80]. In a mouse muscle tendon injury model, TGFβ inhibitor was shown to prevent muscle fatty infiltration and fibrosis by promoting FAP apoptosis [101]. Endurance exercise training induces type II fast to type I slow myofiber conversion. Zeve et al. reported that endurance exercise suppressed adipogenic progenitor proliferation and differentiation into mature adipocytes in vitro and suppressed adipogenesis in vivo in HFD-feeding mice, partially through secretion of R-spondin 3 from slow myofiber, which may activate Wnt signaling to suppress adipogenesis [102]. Muscle fibrosis is also seen in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Using a mouse model for CKD, Dong et al. demonstrated that FAPs account for muscle fibrosis [103], and elevated myostatin production in CKD muscle directly stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of FAPs into fibroblasts via Smad3 signaling, while myostatin inhibition suppresses muscle fibrosis and increases muscle mass [103]. Collectively, these data open up the opportunities of developing novel treatment strategies targeting mesenchymal FAPs to target disorders associated with muscular system. Reciprocally, myofibers can regulate adipose progenitor activity through secreted factors, which could lead to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for obesity and metabolic syndrome.

Myo-endothelial cells

Besides FAP, other muscle interstitial progenitor cells that can differentiate into adipocytes have been identified. This is a heterogeneous group of cells that can be isolated based on distinct cell surface markers (Table 2) and usually exhibits multipotency including myogenic potential. They are distinct from satellite cells with regard to cellular localization and being largely negative for Pax7 expression when freshly isolated. Most of these cells are associated with muscle vessels. One such kind of cells is called myogenic-endothelial progenitor cells. Tamaki and colleagues showed that FACS-sorted CD34pos Sca-1posCD45neg cells can differentiate into myogenic, endothelial, and adipogenic cells in vitro, whereas yield only myoblasts and endothelial cells when implanted in muscle [104]. Recently, we studied Myf5posCD31posSca-1posCD45neg myo-endothelial progenitors and revealed that bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1a (Bmpr1a) signaling was essential for myogenic fate determination of these cells, whereas ablation of Bmpr1a increased their adipogenic differentiation potential [79]. Furthermore, the major function of these myo-endothelial cells in vivo is to inhibit intramuscular adipogenesis through cell-autonomous and cell-cell interaction mechanisms (i.e., through inhibition of FAP adipogenic differentiation) [79]. In 2007, a human counterpart of myo-endothelial cells was prospectively isolated using both satellite cell and endothelial cell markers (CD56, CD34, CD144, Table 2) and these cells displayed myogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, and angiogenic differentiation potential [28, 105]. More importantly, these myo-endothelial cells regenerated myofibers more efficiently than CD56pos satellite cells in cardiotoxin-injured muscle of severe combined immune-deficient mice [28].

Angiogenesis and myogenesis is tightly coordinated for muscle regeneration and satellite cell survival. Endothelial cells (ECs) strongly promote myogenic cell growth and differentiation and inversely, myogenic cells stimulate EC capillarization and lumenization, indicating the reciprocal stimulation of the two cell types. Endothelial dysfunction is a common finding in diabetic patients and animal models [106], but how the subset of ECs—myo-endothelial cells are affected merits further investigation.

Pericytes and mesoangioblasts

Pericytes, the contractile mural cells surrounding the endothelial cells of capillaries and microvessels throughout the body, are important for blood flow regulation, microvasculature integrity, and angiogenesis [107]. Pericytes are characterized by the expression of PDGFRβ, CD146 (M-CAM), neuron-glial antigen 2 (NG2), and α-smooth muscle actin. In mouse skeletal muscle, two types of pericytes have been identified. Both of them express above-mentioned pericyte markers, but only type 1 pericytes express the FAP marker PDGFRα and differentiate into adipocytes in vitro and in vivo, whereas type 2 pericytes are myogenic [108]. Human pericytes were also prospectively isolated as CD146posCD34negCD45negCD56neg cells from various tissues and displayed multilineage developmental potential including myogenic differentiation in spite of their origins (Table 2) [109]. Mouse lineage-tracing experiments and postnatal ablation of muscle pericytes demonstrated that muscle pericytes not only commit to reparative angiogenesis, but also contribute directly to postnatal myofiber growth and regeneration [110, 111]. Meanwhile, pericytes tightly regulate satellite cell growth/differentiation and quiescence through secretion of IGF1 and angiopoietin 1, respectively [111]. Intriguingly, human pericyte transplantation into immune-deficient X-linked muscular dystrophy mice through femoral artery-generated numerous functional myofibers expressing human dystrophin and replenished the satellite cell pool, indicating that pericytes can penetrate basal lamina to fuse into myofibers [112]. In summary, human pericytes can be expanded in vitro, genetically modified and delivered systemically, which makes this cell population a great candidate for cell-based therapy to treat muscle diseases.

Pericyte deterioration and apoptosis are found in most of the diabetic microvascular complications such as diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and type 2 diabetic muscles [113]. Such changes are often followed by reduced capillary density, which could ultimately block insulin and nutrients to reach myocytes [114] and impaired angiogenesis upon the induction of limb ischemia [115]. Oxidative stress at least in part accounts for the underlying mechanisms by which T2DM impairs pericyte function [115, 116]. As shown in an in vitro experiment, hyperinsulinemia-induced pericyte oxidative stress through upregulation of the NADPH oxidase gene Nox2 and reduction of pericyte tube formation capacity; whereas addition of antioxidant NAC prevented Nox2 upregulation and reversed the phenotype [115]. In another study, skeletal muscle pericytes derived from T2DM patients with critical limb ischemia exhibited deficits in terms of decreased proliferation and reduced myogenic ability and antiangiogenic activity, which were associated with downregulation of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase 1 and catalase, and activation of the pro-oxidant PKCβII-p66Shc pathway [116]. In addition, muscular pericytes in diabetic patients are prone to adipogenesis at the expense of myogenesis and angiogenesis [116]. Therefore, restoring pericyte angiomyogenic activity holds therapeutic potential in diabetes.

Mesoangioblasts (MABs), first isolated from the mouse embryonic dorsal aorta, have been identified from postnatal skeletal muscle vessels of different species [29]. MABs express endothelial and/or pericyte markers, possess multipotent mesoderm differentiation ability, and can be expanded in vitro. Most importantly, the transplanted MABs home to and regenerate in the injured/dystrophic muscles upon intra-arterial delivery. Both the systemically and locally delivered MABs regenerate muscle fibers [117,118,119]. These characteristics are quite similar to pericytes, although the relationship between MABs and pericytes is still not fully understood. Skeletal muscle MABs can be isolated from explant cultures of muscle tissue and by selection of a small, round, refractile cell population [29], whereas pericytes are usually isolated by FACS using specific cell surface markers (Table 2) [109]. Even though typical pericyte markers such as NG2 and PDGFRβ were detected in cultured MABs and remained stable over passages, it was not clear whether these MABs expressed pericyte markers immediately after isolation or gained pericyte gene expression profile over time in culture [120]. Nevertheless, in various animal models, donor or self genetically corrected MABs could restore dystrophin expression in 10–70% of myofibers of dystrophic muscle and significantly improved muscle contraction force and motility [117, 121]. These promising studies have led to the first phase I–IIa clinical trial in five DMD patients via intra-arterial transplantation of HLA-matched allogeneic MABs. Cossu et al. demonstrated that this procedure was relatively safe and donor DNA was detected in recipient patients, but no functional improvements were observed [122]. Thus, this study provides a starting point for refining the treatment regiments of MAB therapy.

Mesoangioblasts isolated from muscle biopsies of inclusion-body myositis and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients display remarkable myogenic differentiation defect [123, 124]. Whether hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia are associated with any dysfunction of MABs has not been examined yet. It is well documented that plasma adiponectin content is decreased in obese and/or diabetic individuals [125, 126]. Moreover, adiponectin produced by skeletal muscle is greatly reduced in db/db T2DM mice and in myotubes cultured under hyperglycemic condition [127]. Adiponectin exhibits advantageous effects on MABs including induction of MAB proliferation, migration, and myogenic differentiation and protecting MABs from apoptosis in vitro and in vivo [128]. Therefore, it is feasible to postulate that obese and diabetic condition may impair MAB function due to downregulation of adiponectin and further assessment of the impact of diabetes on the functional and molecular properties of MABs will be necessary to better understand their therapeutic potential.

PW1-expressing interstitial cells (PICs) and Twist2-dependent interstitial progenitors

In 2010, Mitchell et al. identified that cell stress mediator PW1/paternally expressed gene 3 (PW1/Peg3), a large zinc finger protein, was expressed in both satellite cells and a subset of Sca-1posCD34posPax7neg interstitial cells with myogenic potential [129]. The PW1-expressing interstitial cells (PICs) can efficiently contribute to skeletal muscle regeneration in vivo as well as self-renew and generate satellite cells. Interestingly, PICs require Pax7 for myogenic specification as PICs isolated from Pax7 null mice lose myogenic capacity [129]. Subsequent work by the same group demonstrated that PICs were heterogeneous and could be divided into two subgroups based on PDGFRα expression. Myogenic PICs were restricted in PDGFRαneg population, whereas PDGFRαpos PICs expressing white, beige, and brown fat-specific markers could give rise to adipocyte in culture [130]. Human PICs also exist as shown by Bonfanti et al. that PW1 gene was expressed at high levels in mesoangioblasts derived from human muscle biopsies, suggesting a subset of PICs corresponds to mesoangioblasts. More importantly, silencing PW1 in mesoangioblast inhibited its myogenic potential through MyoD degradation and abrogated its ability to penetrate the blood vessel wall and to engraft into damaged myofibers [131]. Altogether, these data indicate that myogenic potential of PICs is tightly regulated by myogenic transcription factors.

More recently, muscle Twist2 (Tw2) transcription factor-dependent interstitial progenitors have been characterized to be myogenic and specifically contribute to type IIb/x glycolytic fibers during adulthood and muscle regeneration [132]. Muscle fibers are highly adaptive and can switch from one kind to another under altered physiological or pathological conditions. In T2DM and/or obese patients, a significant muscle fiber-type switch from slow oxidative fibers (type I) to fast glycolytic fibers (types IIa, IIb, IIx) was observed, which was associated with reduced oxidative enzyme activity [11] and increased glycolytic metabolism [133]. It is worthwhile to study the effects of type 2 diabetes and obesity on Tw2pos progenitors and to determine whether Tw2pos cells contribute to fiber-type transition by de novo type IIb/x myofiber formation.

It is important to note that the above-mentioned interstitial progenitors partially overlap with each other. For example, FAPs partially overlap with PDGFRα-expressing pericytes and PICs, while pericytes might be the muscle-resident postnatal equivalent of mesoangioblasts. Recently, Yao et al. indicate that muscle-resident PDGFRβpos cells contain pericytes and PICs, and ablation of Laminin γ1 gene in these PDGFRβ expressing cells results in diminished myogenic activity and enhanced adipogenic activity [134]. These results indicate that pericytes and PICs are associated cell populations that use common mechanisms for cell fate specification. Future investigations should focus on the mechanisms that regulate the fate determination of these interstitial cells under both physiological and pathological conditions. The comparison of muscle-resident progenitors is summarized in Table 2.

Stem cell therapies by targeting diabetic and obese muscle

Stem cell therapies have afforded promises in the treatment of chronic diseases including high-fat diet-induced obesity and T2DM [135,136,137]. Recent studies have shown that stem cell implantation into skeletal muscle may ameliorate diabetic symptoms. Ye and co-workers demonstrated that human skeletal myoblast (hSkM) transplantation into limb muscles of KK mouse, an animal model of T2DM, could alleviate hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and improve glucose tolerance [138]. Donor hSkM survived extensively and integrated into host mouse skeletal muscles at 12 weeks after transplantation and resulted in changes of gene transcripts involved in insulin signaling pathway and mitochondrial biogenesis and function [138, 139]. It is possible that fusion of healthy hSkMs into host myofibers of T2DM recipients could enable the donor nuclei to supplement multiple genes involved in insulin-mediated glucose transport and metabolism and reverse muscle insulin resistance.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells originated from the mesoderm and have been used for clinical trials to treat numerous diseases, including immune disorders and tissue injury [135]. Shibata et al. revealed that intramuscular injection of bone marrow-derived MSCs improved diabetic polyneuropathy in skeletal muscle [140]. Notably, MSCs were not incorporated into tissue structures of recipient animals; instead, they stimulated local production and secretion of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which may mediate the therapeutic effects in injected muscle. In another study, local injection of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated MSCs enhanced recovery of angiogenesis and blood flow of the ischemic hind-limb muscles of type 2 diabetic mice through modulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), VEGF, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathways. Meanwhile, injected MSCs had been shown to differentiate into new vessels [141]. Therefore, it is likely that paracrine effects and differentiation coexist for MSCs to exert beneficial effects.

Similarly, Abrigo et al. indicated that systemic administration of bone marrow-derived MSCs improved HFD-induced skeletal muscle atrophy by inhibition of oxidative stress, myonuclear apoptosis, and ubiquitin proteasome pathway activation [142]. However, these anti-atrophic effects were neither mediated through incorporation of MSCs into myofibers nor related to obesity reversion. MSCs secrete a variety of cytokines and growth factors that could contribute to muscle repair through autocrine and paracrine activities [143]. Recent studies demonstrated that MSCs shed a large number of extracellular vesicles including microvesicles (0.1–1 mm in diameter) and exosomes (30–100 nm in diameter) into the extracellular space, which exert a novel paracrine effect through mediating cell-cell communication [144, 145]. For example, MSCs derived from placenta could enhance the myogenic differentiation of both mouse and human myoblasts isolated from mdx mice and DMD patients, respectively [146]. The therapeutic effects are mediated at least in part via exosomal secretion of miR-29 and extend to inhibition of fibrosis, decreasing creatine kinase levels and increasing utrophin expression in mdx mice [146].

In summary, MSCs are more likely acting in a paracrine fashion to modify muscle microenvironment. Notably, Sacchetti et al. argue that MSCs from different tissues differ widely in their transcriptomic signature and in vivo differentiation potential [147], which should be taken into consideration during therapeutic application. Longitudinal and further studies are also necessary to assess whether systemically delivered MSCs differentiate and incorporate into different tissues and to compare the efficacy of different routes of MSCs administration to counteract insulin resistance.

Conclusion

Progressive loss of muscle mass, excessive intramuscular and intermuscular lipid deposition, and reduced muscle contractile activity are characteristics of degenerative muscular diseases and muscle disorders in systemic diseases like type 2 diabetes. Accumulating evidence suggest that both satellite cells and muscle-resident mesenchymal progenitors play important roles in maintaining skeletal muscle homeostasis and defects in either cell population could contribute to the pathogenesis of muscle diseases [43, 96].

Even though muscle-resident mesenchymal progenitors possess multilineage differentiation potency, they remain in an undifferentiated state under physiological condition. In injured or diseased muscle, such as in DMD or FOP muscle, these progenitors undergo lineage-specific differentiation and can adopt a fibrogenic, adipogenic, osteogenic, or chondrogenic fate (Table 2) [85, 96]. Dynamic and reciprocal interactions between satellite cells and interstitial cells or among distinct interstitial cell populations may determine the fate of interstitial progenitor cells [26, 79]. Moreover, this kind of interplay may have an impact on the direction of muscle repair towards regeneration or fibroadipogenic degeneration [80, 116].

A complete understanding of the function of diverse muscle-resident progenitors and unraveling the mechanisms underpinning their interplay and fate specification will shed light on developing new strategies to maintain muscle integrity and therapeutic interventions against obesity and diabetes.

Abbreviations

ACVR1:

Activin A receptor type I

AKT:

Also known as protein kinase B

AMPK:

AMP-activated protein kinase

aP2:

Adipocyte protein 2

bFGF:

Basic fibroblast growth factor

BMP:

Bone morphogenetic protein

Bmpr1a:

Bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1a

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

DMD:

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

ECs:

Endothelial cells

EGF:

Epidermal growth factor

eIF3-f:

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F

eNOS:

Endothelial nitric oxide synthase

FABP4:

Fatty acid binding protein 4

FACS:

Fluorescence activated cell sorting

FAPs:

Fibroadipogenic progenitors

FOP:

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

HFD:

High-fat diet

Hh:

Hedgehog

HIF:

Hypoxia-inducible factor

HO:

Heterotopic ossification

hSkM:

Human skeletal myoblast

IMCL:

Intramyocellular lipid

IRS-1:

Insulin receptor substrate-1

LZR:

Lean Zucker Rat

MABs:

Mesoangioblasts

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MCAM:

Melanoma cell adhesion molecule

MCP:

Monocyte chemotactic protein

MMP14:

Matrix metallopeptidase 14

MRFs:

Myogenic regulatory factors

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

MuRF1:

Muscle ring-finger protein-1

NCAM:

Neural cell adhesion molecule

NG2:

Neuron-glial antigen

OZR:

Obese Zucker rat

PDGFRα:

Platelet-derived growth factor receptor α

Peg3:

Paternally expressed gene 3

PI3K:

Phosphoinositide-3-kinase

PICs:

PW1-expressing interstitial cells

PIP3:

Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate

PTEN:

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

SC:

Satellite cell

STAT6:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TIMP3:

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3

Tw2:

Twist2

VCAM-1:

Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. 1.

    McCarthy MI. Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2339–50.

  2. 2.

    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1377–96.

  3. 3.

    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1513–30.

  4. 4.

    Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017;389:2239–51.

  5. 5.

    DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Jequier E, Maeder E, Wahren J, Felber JP. The effect of insulin on the disposal of intravenous glucose. Results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterization. Diabetes. 1981;30:1000–7.

  6. 6.

    Meng ZX, Gong J, Chen Z, Sun J, Xiao Y, Wang L, et al. Glucose sensing by skeletal myocytes couples nutrient signaling to systemic homeostasis. Mol Cell. 2017;66:332–44. e4

  7. 7.

    Warram JH, Martin BC, Krolewski AS, Soeldner JS, Kahn CR. Slow glucose removal rate and hyperinsulinemia precede the development of type II diabetes in the offspring of diabetic parents. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:909–15.

  8. 8.

    DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2):S157–63.

  9. 9.

    Andersen H, Gadeberg PC, Brock B, Jakobsen J. Muscular atrophy in diabetic neuropathy: a stereological magnetic resonance imaging study. Diabetologia. 1997;40:1062–9.

  10. 10.

    Sishi B, Loos B, Ellis B, Smith W, du Toit EF, Engelbrecht AM. Diet-induced obesity alters signalling pathways and induces atrophy and apoptosis in skeletal muscle in a prediabetic rat model. Exp Physiol. 2011;96:179–93.

  11. 11.

    Oberbach A, Bossenz Y, Lehmann S, Niebauer J, Adams V, Paschke R, et al. Altered fiber distribution and fiber-specific glycolytic and oxidative enzyme activity in skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:895–900.

  12. 12.

    Ciaraldi TP, Abrams L, Nikoulina S, Mudaliar S, Henry RR. Glucose transport in cultured human skeletal muscle cells. Regulation by insulin and glucose in nondiabetic and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus subjects. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2820–7.

  13. 13.

    Damsbo P, Vaag A, Hother-Nielsen O, Beck-Nielsen H. Reduced glycogen synthase activity in skeletal muscle from obese patients with and without type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1991;34:239–45.

  14. 14.

    Nikoulina SE, Ciaraldi TP, Carter L, Mudaliar S, Park KS, Henry RR. Impaired muscle glycogen synthase in type 2 diabetes is associated with diminished phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:4307–14.

  15. 15.

    Koves TR, Ussher JR, Noland RC, Slentz D, Mosedale M, Ilkayeva O, et al. Mitochondrial overload and incomplete fatty acid oxidation contribute to skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2008;7:45–56.

  16. 16.

    Macdonald IA. A review of recent evidence relating to sugars, insulin resistance and diabetes. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55:17–23.

  17. 17.

    Ciaraldi TP, Ryan AJ, Mudaliar SR, Henry RR. Altered myokine secretion is an intrinsic property of skeletal muscle in type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158209.

  18. 18.

    Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27:337–9.

  19. 19.

    Pedersen M, Bruunsgaard H, Weis N, Hendel HW, Andreassen BU, Eldrup E, et al. Circulating levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6-relation to truncal fat mass and muscle mass in healthy elderly individuals and in patients with type-2 diabetes. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124:495–502.

  20. 20.

    Park SW, Goodpaster BH, Lee JS, Kuller LH, Boudreau R, de Rekeneire N, et al. Excessive loss of skeletal muscle mass in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1993–7.

  21. 21.

    Morley JE, Anker SD, von Haehling S. Prevalence, incidence, and clinical impact of sarcopenia: facts, numbers, and epidemiology-update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5:253–9.

  22. 22.

    Kim KS, Park KS, Kim MJ, Kim SK, Cho YW, Park SW. Type 2 diabetes is associated with low muscle mass in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14(Suppl 1):115–21.

  23. 23.

    Koo BK, Roh E, Yang YS, Moon MK. Difference between old and young adults in contribution of beta-cell function and sarcopenia in developing diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7:233–40.

  24. 24.

    Kalinkovich A, Livshits G. Sarcopenic obesity or obese sarcopenia: a cross talk between age-associated adipose tissue and skeletal muscle inflammation as a main mechanism of the pathogenesis. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;35:200–21.

  25. 25.

    Mauro A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961;9:493–5.

  26. 26.

    Uezumi A, Fukada S, Yamamoto N, Takeda S, Tsuchida K. Mesenchymal progenitors distinct from satellite cells contribute to ectopic fat cell formation in skeletal muscle. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:143–52.

  27. 27.

    Joe AW, Yi L, Natarajan A, Le Grand F, So L, Wang J, et al. Muscle injury activates resident fibro/adipogenic progenitors that facilitate myogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:153–63.

  28. 28.

    Zheng B, Cao B, Crisan M, Sun B, Li G, Logar A, et al. Prospective identification of myogenic endothelial cells in human skeletal muscle. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1025–34.

  29. 29.

    Tonlorenzi R, Dellavalle A, Schnapp E, Cossu G, Sampaolesi M. Isolation and characterization of mesoangioblasts from mouse, dog, and human tissues. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2007; Chapter 2: Unit 2B 1.

  30. 30.

    Hu Z, Wang H, Lee IH, Modi S, Wang X, Du J, et al. PTEN inhibition improves muscle regeneration in mice fed a high-fat diet. Diabetes. 2010;59:1312–20.

  31. 31.

    Hilton TN, Tuttle LJ, Bohnert KL, Mueller MJ, Sinacore DR. Excessive adipose tissue infiltration in skeletal muscle in individuals with obesity, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy: association with performance and function. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1336–44.

  32. 32.

    Shafiq SA, Gorycki MA, Milhorat AT. An electron microscopic study of regeneration and satellite cells in human muscle. Neurology. 1967;17:567–74 passim.

  33. 33.

    Lipton BH, Schultz E. Developmental fate of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Science. 1979;205:1292–4.

  34. 34.

    Blau HM, Webster C. Isolation and characterization of human muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:5623–7.

  35. 35.

    Collins CA, Olsen I, Zammit PS, Heslop L, Petrie A, Partridge TA, et al. Stem cell function, self-renewal, and behavioral heterogeneity of cells from the adult muscle satellite cell niche. Cell. 2005;122:289–301.

  36. 36.

    Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell. 2007;129:999–1010.

  37. 37.

    Seale P, Sabourin LA, Girgis-Gabardo A, Mansouri A, Gruss P, Rudnicki MA. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell. 2000;102:777–86.

  38. 38.

    Lepper C, Conway SJ, Fan CM. Adult satellite cells and embryonic muscle progenitors have distinct genetic requirements. Nature. 2009;460:627–31.

  39. 39.

    Lepper C, Partridge TA, Fan CM. An absolute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3639–46.

  40. 40.

    Yin H, Price F, Rudnicki MA. Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:23–67.

  41. 41.

    Woo M, Isganaitis E, Cerletti M, Fitzpatrick C, Wagers AJ, Jimenez-Chillaron J, et al. Early life nutrition modulates muscle stem cell number: implications for muscle mass and repair. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20:1763–9.

  42. 42.

    D'Souza DM, Trajcevski KE, Al-Sajee D, Wang DC, Thomas M, Anderson JE, et al. Diet-induced obesity impairs muscle satellite cell activation and muscle repair through alterations in hepatocyte growth factor signaling. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12506.

  43. 43.

    Fu X, Zhu M, Zhang S, Foretz M, Viollet B, Du M. Obesity impairs skeletal muscle regeneration through inhibition of AMPK. Diabetes. 2016;65:188–200.

  44. 44.

    Bray GA. The Zucker-fatty rat: a review. Fed Proc. 1977;36:148–53.

  45. 45.

    Peterson JM, Bryner RW, Alway SE. Satellite cell proliferation is reduced in muscles of obese Zucker rats but restored with loading. Am J Phys Cell Phys. 2008;295:C521–8.

  46. 46.

    Scarda A, Franzin C, Milan G, Sanna M, Dal Pra C, Pagano C, et al. Increased adipogenic conversion of muscle satellite cells in obese Zucker rats. Int J Obes. 2010;34:1319–27.

  47. 47.

    Argiles JM, Busquets S, Alvarez B, Lopez-Soriano FJ. Mechanism for the increased skeletal muscle protein degradation in the obese Zucker rat. J Nutr Biochem. 1999;10:244–8.

  48. 48.

    Lagirand-Cantaloube J, Offner N, Csibi A, Leibovitch MP, Batonnet-Pichon S, Tintignac LA, et al. The initiation factor eIF3-f is a major target for atrogin1/MAFbx function in skeletal muscle atrophy. EMBO J. 2008;27:1266–76.

  49. 49.

    Lagirand-Cantaloube J, Cornille K, Csibi A, Batonnet-Pichon S, Leibovitch MP, Leibovitch SA. Inhibition of atrogin-1/MAFbx mediated MyoD proteolysis prevents skeletal muscle atrophy in vivo. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4973.

  50. 50.

    Polge C, Heng AE, Jarzaguet M, Ventadour S, Claustre A, Combaret L, et al. Muscle actin is polyubiquitinylated in vitro and in vivo and targeted for breakdown by the E3 ligase MuRF1. FASEB J. 2011;25:3790–802.

  51. 51.

    Heng AE, Ventadour S, Jarzaguet M, Pouch-Pelissier MN, Guezennec CY, Bigard X, et al. Coordinate expression of the 19S regulatory complex and evidence for ubiquitin-dependent telethonin degradation in the unloaded soleus muscle. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:2544–52.

  52. 52.

    Fielitz J, Kim MS, Shelton JM, Latif S, Spencer JA, Glass DJ, et al. Myosin accumulation and striated muscle myopathy result from the loss of muscle RING finger 1 and 3. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2486–95.

  53. 53.

    Bonaldo P, Sandri M. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:25–39.

  54. 54.

    Tschop M, Heiman ML. Rodent obesity models: an overview. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2001;109:307–19.

  55. 55.

    Nguyen MH, Cheng M, Koh TJ. Impaired muscle regeneration in ob/ob and db/db mice. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1525–35.

  56. 56.

    Gaster M, Petersen I, Hojlund K, Poulsen P, Beck-Nielsen H. The diabetic phenotype is conserved in myotubes established from diabetic subjects: evidence for primary defects in glucose transport and glycogen synthase activity. Diabetes. 2002;51:921–7.

  57. 57.

    Green CJ, Pedersen M, Pedersen BK, Scheele C. Elevated NF-kappaB activation is conserved in human myocytes cultured from obese type 2 diabetic patients and attenuated by AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetes. 2011;60:2810–9.

  58. 58.

    Yoon JH, Kim D, Jang JH, Ghim J, Park S, Song P, et al. Proteomic analysis of the palmitate-induced myotube secretome reveals involvement of the annexin A1-formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) pathway in insulin resistance. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:882–92.

  59. 59.

    Deshmukh AS, Cox J, Jensen LJ, Meissner F, Mann M. Secretome analysis of lipid-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle cells by a combined experimental and bioinformatics workflow. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:4885–95.

  60. 60.

    Asakura A, Komaki M, Rudnicki M. Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation. 2001;68:245–53.

  61. 61.

    Wada MR, Inagawa-Ogashiwa M, Shimizu S, Yasumoto S, Hashimoto N. Generation of different fates from multipotent muscle stem cells. Development. 2002;129:2987–95.

  62. 62.

    Seale P, Bjork B, Yang W, Kajimura S, Chin S, Kuang S, et al. PRDM16 controls a brown fat/skeletal muscle switch. Nature. 2008;454:961–7.

  63. 63.

    Ross SE, Hemati N, Longo KA, Bennett CN, Lucas PC, Erickson RL, et al. Inhibition of adipogenesis by Wnt signaling. Science. 2000;289:950–3.

  64. 64.

    Csete M, Walikonis J, Slawny N, Wei Y, Korsnes S, Doyle JC, et al. Oxygen-mediated regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation and adipogenesis in culture. J Cell Physiol. 2001;189:189–96.

  65. 65.

    Taylor-Jones JM, McGehee RE, Rando TA, Lecka-Czernik B, Lipschitz DA, Peterson CA. Activation of an adipogenic program in adult myoblasts with age. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002;123:649–61.

  66. 66.

    Aguiari P, Leo S, Zavan B, Vindigni V, Rimessi A, Bianchi K, et al. High glucose induces adipogenic differentiation of muscle-derived stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1226–31.

  67. 67.

    Kanisicak O, Mendez JJ, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto M, Goldhamer DJ. Progenitors of skeletal muscle satellite cells express the muscle determination gene. MyoD Dev Biol. 2009;332:131–41.

  68. 68.

    Starkey JD, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto S, Goldhamer DJ. Skeletal muscle satellite cells are committed to myogenesis and do not spontaneously adopt nonmyogenic fates. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011;59:33–46.

  69. 69.

    Shan T, Zhang P, Bi P, Kuang S. Lkb1 deletion promotes ectopic lipid accumulation in muscle progenitor cells and mature muscles. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:1033–41.

  70. 70.

    Cree MG, Newcomer BR, Katsanos CS, Sheffield-Moore M, Chinkes D, Aarsland A, et al. Intramuscular and liver triglycerides are increased in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3864–71.

  71. 71.

    Ingram KH, Hill H, Moellering DR, Hill BG, Lara-Castro C, Newcomer B, et al. Skeletal muscle lipid peroxidation and insulin resistance in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E1182–6.

  72. 72.

    Goodpaster BH, Theriault R, Watkins SC, Kelley DE. Intramuscular lipid content is increased in obesity and decreased by weight loss. Metabolism. 2000;49:467–72.

  73. 73.

    Goodpaster BH, He J, Watkins S, Kelley DE. Skeletal muscle lipid content and insulin resistance: evidence for a paradox in endurance-trained athletes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5755–61.

  74. 74.

    Gemmink A, Goodpaster BH, Schrauwen P, Hesselink MKC. Intramyocellular lipid droplets and insulin sensitivity, the human perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 1862;2017:1242–9.

  75. 75.

    Dube JJ, Amati F, Stefanovic-Racic M, Toledo FG, Sauers SE, Goodpaster BH. Exercise-induced alterations in intramyocellular lipids and insulin resistance: the athlete's paradox revisited. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;294:E882–8.

  76. 76.

    Mogi M, Kohara K, Nakaoka H, Kan-No H, Tsukuda K, Wang XL, et al. Diabetic mice exhibited a peculiar alteration in body composition with exaggerated ectopic fat deposition after muscle injury due to anomalous cell differentiation. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7:213–24.

  77. 77.

    Uezumi A, Ito T, Morikawa D, Shimizu N, Yoneda T, Segawa M, et al. Fibrosis and adipogenesis originate from a common mesenchymal progenitor in skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:3654–64.

  78. 78.

    Mueller AA, van Velthoven CT, Fukumoto KD, Cheung TH, Rando TA. Intronic polyadenylation of PDGFRalpha in resident stem cells attenuates muscle fibrosis. Nature. 2016;540:276–9.

  79. 79.

    Huang P, Schulz TJ, Beauvais A, Tseng YH, Gussoni E. Intramuscular adipogenesis is inhibited by myo-endothelial progenitors with functioning Bmpr1a signalling. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4063.

  80. 80.

    Cordani N, Pisa V, Pozzi L, Sciorati C, Clementi E. Nitric oxide controls fat deposition in dystrophic skeletal muscle by regulating fibro-adipogenic precursor differentiation. Stem Cells. 2014;32:874–85.

  81. 81.

    Heredia JE, Mukundan L, Chen FM, Mueller AA, Deo RC, Locksley RM, et al. Type 2 innate signals stimulate fibro/adipogenic progenitors to facilitate muscle regeneration. Cell. 2013;153:376–88.

  82. 82.

    Shi Y, Long F. Hedgehog signaling via Gli2 prevents obesity induced by high-fat diet in adult mice. Elife. 2017;6:e31649

  83. 83.

    Kopinke D, Roberson EC, Reiter JF. Ciliary hedgehog signaling restricts injury-induced adipogenesis. Cell. 2017;170:340–51. e12

  84. 84.

    Dey D, Bagarova J, Hatsell SJ, Armstrong KA, Huang L, Ermann J, et al. Two tissue-resident progenitor lineages drive distinct phenotypes of heterotopic ossification. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:366ra163.

  85. 85.

    Lees-Shepard JB, Yamamoto M, Biswas AA, Stoessel SJ, Nicholas SE, Cogswell CA, et al. Activin-dependent signaling in fibro/adipogenic progenitors causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Commun. 2018;9:471.

  86. 86.

    Shore EM, Xu M, Feldman GJ, Fenstermacher DA, Cho TJ, Choi IH, et al. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat Genet. 2006;38:525–7.

  87. 87.

    Hino K, Horigome K, Nishio M, Komura S, Nagata S, Zhao C, et al. Activin-A enhances mTOR signaling to promote aberrant chondrogenesis in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3339–52.

  88. 88.

    Hatsell SJ, Idone V, Wolken DM, Huang L, Kim HJ, Wang L, et al. ACVR1R206H receptor mutation causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva by imparting responsiveness to activin A. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:303ra137.

  89. 89.

    Chakkalakal SA, Uchibe K, Convente MR, Zhang D, Economides AN, Kaplan FS, et al. Palovarotene inhibits heterotopic ossification and maintains limb mobility and growth in mice with the human ACVR1(R206H) fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) mutation. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1666–75.

  90. 90.

    Eisenstein N, Stapley S, Grover L. Post-traumatic heterotopic ossification: an old problem in need of new solutions. J Orthop Res. 2018;36:1061–8.

  91. 91.

    Mozzetta C, Consalvi S, Saccone V, Tierney M, Diamantini A, Mitchell KJ, et al. Fibroadipogenic progenitors mediate the ability of HDAC inhibitors to promote regeneration in dystrophic muscles of young, but not old Mdx mice. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:626–39.

  92. 92.

    Serrano AL, Baeza-Raja B, Perdiguero E, Jardi M, Munoz-Canoves P. Interleukin-6 is an essential regulator of satellite cell-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Cell Metab. 2008;7:33–44.

  93. 93.

    Zhu J, Li Y, Lu A, Gharaibeh B, Ma J, Kobayashi T, et al. Follistatin improves skeletal muscle healing after injury and disease through an interaction with muscle regeneration, angiogenesis, and fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:915–30.

  94. 94.

    Liu W, Liu Y, Lai X, Kuang S. Intramuscular adipose is derived from a non-Pax3 lineage and required for efficient regeneration of skeletal muscles. Dev Biol. 2012;361:27–38.

  95. 95.

    Murphy MM, Lawson JA, Mathew SJ, Hutcheson DA, Kardon G. Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3625–37.

  96. 96.

    Uezumi A, Fukada S, Yamamoto N, Ikemoto-Uezumi M, Nakatani M, Morita M, et al. Identification and characterization of PDGFRalpha+ mesenchymal progenitors in human skeletal muscle. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1186.

  97. 97.

    Arrighi N, Moratal C, Clement N, Giorgetti-Peraldi S, Peraldi P, Loubat A, et al. Characterization of adipocytes derived from fibro/adipogenic progenitors resident in human skeletal muscle. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1733.

  98. 98.

    Uezumi A, Nakatani M, Ikemoto-Uezumi M, Yamamoto N, Morita M, Yamaguchi A, et al. Cell-surface protein profiling identifies distinctive markers of progenitor cells in human skeletal muscle. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;7:263–78.

  99. 99.

    Laurens C, Louche K, Sengenes C, Coue M, Langin D, Moro C, et al. Adipogenic progenitors from obese human skeletal muscle give rise to functional white adipocytes that contribute to insulin resistance. Int J Obes. 2016;40:497–506.

  100. 100.

    Ito T, Ogawa R, Uezumi A, Ohtani T, Watanabe Y, Tsujikawa K, et al. Imatinib attenuates severe mouse dystrophy and inhibits proliferation and fibrosis-marker expression in muscle mesenchymal progenitors. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23:349–56.

  101. 101.

    Davies MR, Liu X, Lee L, Laron D, Ning AY, Kim HT, et al. TGF-beta small molecule inhibitor SB431542 reduces rotator cuff muscle fibrosis and fatty infiltration by promoting fibro/adipogenic progenitor apoptosis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0155486.

  102. 102.

    Zeve D, Millay DP, Seo J, Graff JM. Exercise-induced skeletal muscle adaptations alter the activity of adipose progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152129.

  103. 103.

    Dong J, Dong Y, Chen Z, Mitch WE, Zhang L. The pathway to muscle fibrosis depends on myostatin stimulating the differentiation of fibro/adipogenic progenitor cells in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017;91:119–28.

  104. 104.

    Tamaki T, Akatsuka A, Ando K, Nakamura Y, Matsuzawa H, Hotta T, et al. Identification of myogenic-endothelial progenitor cells in the interstitial spaces of skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:571–7.

  105. 105.

    Zheng B, Li G, Chen WC, Deasy BM, Pollett JB, Sun B, et al. Human myogenic endothelial cells exhibit chondrogenic and osteogenic potentials at the clonal level. J Orthop Res. 2013;31:1089–95.

  106. 106.

    Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 2015; 7th ed.

  107. 107.

    Armulik A, Genove G, Betsholtz C. Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Dev Cell. 2011;21:193–215.

  108. 108.

    Birbrair A, Zhang T, Wang ZM, Messi ML, Enikolopov GN, Mintz A, et al. Role of pericytes in skeletal muscle regeneration and fat accumulation. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:2298–314.

  109. 109.

    Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, Chen CW, Corselli M, Park TS, et al. A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3:301–13.

  110. 110.

    Dellavalle A, Maroli G, Covarello D, Azzoni E, Innocenzi A, Perani L, et al. Pericytes resident in postnatal skeletal muscle differentiate into muscle fibres and generate satellite cells. Nat Commun. 2011;2:499.

  111. 111.

    Kostallari E, Baba-Amer Y, Alonso-Martin S, Ngoh P, Relaix F, Lafuste P, et al. Pericytes in the myovascular niche promote post-natal myofiber growth and satellite cell quiescence. Development. 2015;142:1242–53.

  112. 112.

    Dellavalle A, Sampaolesi M, Tonlorenzi R, Tagliafico E, Sacchetti B, Perani L, et al. Pericytes of human skeletal muscle are myogenic precursors distinct from satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:255–67.

  113. 113.

    Tilton RG, Hoffmann PL, Kilo C, Williamson JR. Pericyte degeneration and basement membrane thickening in skeletal muscle capillaries of human diabetics. Diabetes. 1981;30:326–34.

  114. 114.

    Hayden MR, Yang Y, Habibi J, Bagree SV, Sowers JR. Pericytopathy: oxidative stress and impaired cellular longevity in the pancreas and skeletal muscle in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2010;3:290–303.

  115. 115.

    Hayes KL, Messina LM, Schwartz LM, Yan J, Burnside AS, Witkowski S. Type 2 diabetes impairs the ability of skeletal muscle pericytes to augment postischemic neovascularization in db/db mice. Am J Phys Cell Phys. 2018;314(5):C534–44.

  116. 116.

    Vono R, Fuoco C, Testa S, Pirro S, Maselli D, Ferland McCollough D, et al. Activation of the Pro-Oxidant PKCbetaII-p66Shc signaling pathway contributes to pericyte dysfunction in skeletal muscles of patients with diabetes with critical limb ischemia. Diabetes. 2016;65:3691–704.

  117. 117.

    Sampaolesi M, Blot S, D'Antona G, Granger N, Tonlorenzi R, Innocenzi A, et al. Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature. 2006;444:574–9.

  118. 118.

    Berry SE, Liu J, Chaney EJ, Kaufman SJ. Multipotential mesoangioblast stem cell therapy in the mdx/utrn-/- mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Regen Med. 2007;2:275–88.

  119. 119.

    Bosurgi L, Corna G, Vezzoli M, Touvier T, Cossu G, Manfredi AA, et al. Transplanted mesoangioblasts require macrophage IL-10 for survival in a mouse model of muscle injury. J Immunol. 2012;188:6267–77.

  120. 120.

    Loperfido M, Jarmin S, Dastidar S, Di Matteo M, Perini I, Moore M, et al. piggyBac transposons expressing full-length human dystrophin enable genetic correction of dystrophic mesoangioblasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:744–60.

  121. 121.

    Tedesco FS, Hoshiya H, D'Antona G, Gerli MF, Messina G, Antonini S, et al. Stem cell-mediated transfer of a human artificial chromosome ameliorates muscular dystrophy. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:96ra78.

  122. 122.

    Cossu G, Previtali SC, Napolitano S, Cicalese MP, Tedesco FS, Nicastro F, et al. Intra-arterial transplantation of HLA-matched donor mesoangioblasts in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7:1513–28.

  123. 123.

    Morosetti R, Mirabella M, Gliubizzi C, Broccolini A, De Angelis L, Tagliafico E, et al. MyoD expression restores defective myogenic differentiation of human mesoangioblasts from inclusion-body myositis muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16995–7000.

  124. 124.

    Morosetti R, Mirabella M, Gliubizzi C, Broccolini A, Sancricca C, Pescatori M, et al. Isolation and characterization of mesoangioblasts from facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy muscle biopsies. Stem Cells. 2007;25:3173–82.

  125. 125.

    Hotta K, Funahashi T, Arita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, Okamoto Y, et al. Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1595–9.

  126. 126.

    Santaniemi M, Kesaniemi YA, Ukkola O. Low plasma adiponectin concentration is an indicator of the metabolic syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;155:745–50.

  127. 127.

    Liu Y, Chewchuk S, Lavigne C, Brule S, Pilon G, Houde V, et al. Functional significance of skeletal muscle adiponectin production, changes in animal models of obesity and diabetes, and regulation by rosiglitazone treatment. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;297:E657–64.

  128. 128.

    Fiaschi T, Tedesco FS, Giannoni E, Diaz-Manera J, Parri M, Cossu G, et al. Globular adiponectin as a complete mesoangioblast regulator: role in proliferation, survival, motility, and skeletal muscle differentiation. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:848–59.

  129. 129.

    Mitchell KJ, Pannerec A, Cadot B, Parlakian A, Besson V, Gomes ER, et al. Identification and characterization of a non-satellite cell muscle resident progenitor during postnatal development. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:257–66.

  130. 130.

    Pannerec A, Formicola L, Besson V, Marazzi G, Sassoon DA. Defining skeletal muscle resident progenitors and their cell fate potentials. Development. 2013;140:2879–91.

  131. 131.

    Bonfanti C, Rossi G, Tedesco FS, Giannotta M, Benedetti S, Tonlorenzi R, et al. PW1/Peg3 expression regulates key properties that determine mesoangioblast stem cell competence. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6364.

  132. 132.

    Liu N, Garry GA, Li S, Bezprozvannaya S, Sanchez-Ortiz E, Chen B, et al. A Twist2-dependent progenitor cell contributes to adult skeletal muscle. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:202–13.

  133. 133.

    Giebelstein J, Poschmann G, Hojlund K, Schechinger W, Dietrich JW, Levin K, et al. The proteomic signature of insulin-resistant human skeletal muscle reveals increased glycolytic and decreased mitochondrial enzymes. Diabetologia. 2012;55:1114–27.

  134. 134.

    Yao Y, Norris EH, Mason CE, Strickland S. Laminin regulates PDGFRbeta(+) cell stemness and muscle development. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11415.

  135. 135.

    Parekkadan B, Milwid JM. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;12:87–117.

  136. 136.

    Lin YY, Chen CY, Lin Y, Chiu YP, Chen CC, Liu BH, et al. Modulation of glucose and lipid metabolism by porcine adiponectin receptor 1-transgenic mesenchymal stromal cells in diet-induced obese mice. Cytotherapy. 2013;15:971–8.

  137. 137.

    Ouyang B, Sun X, Han D, Chen S, Yao B, Gao Y, et al. Human urine-derived stem cells alone or genetically-modified with FGF2 Improve type 2 diabetic erectile dysfunction in a rat model. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92825.

  138. 138.

    Ye L, Lee KO, Su LP, Toh WC, Haider HK, Law PK, et al. Skeletal myoblast transplantation for attenuation of hyperglycaemia, hyperinsulinaemia and glucose intolerance in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2009;52:1925–34.

  139. 139.

    Ma JH, Su LP, Zhu J, Law PK, Lee KO, Ye L, et al. Skeletal myoblast transplantation on gene expression profiles of insulin signaling pathway and mitochondrial biogenesis and function in skeletal muscle. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;102:43–52.

  140. 140.

    Shibata T, Naruse K, Kamiya H, Kozakae M, Kondo M, Yasuda Y, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improves diabetic polyneuropathy in rats. Diabetes. 2008;57:3099–107.

  141. 141.

    Amin AH, Abd Elmageed ZY, Nair D, Partyka MI, Kadowitz PJ, Belmadani S, et al. Modified multipotent stromal cells with epidermal growth factor restore vasculogenesis and blood flow in ischemic hind-limb of type II diabetic mice. Lab Investig. 2010;90:985–96.

  142. 142.

    Abrigo J, Rivera JC, Aravena J, Cabrera D, Simon F, Ezquer F, et al. High fat diet-induced skeletal muscle wasting is decreased by mesenchymal stem cells administration: implications on oxidative stress, ubiquitin proteasome pathway activation, and myonuclear apoptosis. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:9047821.

  143. 143.

    Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98:1076–84.

  144. 144.

    Phinney DG, Di Giuseppe M, Njah J, Sala E, Shiva S, St Croix CM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells use extracellular vesicles to outsource mitophagy and shuttle microRNAs. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8472.

  145. 145.

    Nakamura Y, Miyaki S, Ishitobi H, Matsuyama S, Nakasa T, Kamei N, et al. Mesenchymal-stem-cell-derived exosomes accelerate skeletal muscle regeneration. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:1257–65.

  146. 146.

    Bier A, Berenstein P, Kronfeld N, Morgoulis D, Ziv-Av A, Goldstein H, et al. Placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their exosomes exert therapeutic effects in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Biomaterials. 2018;174:67–78.

  147. 147.

    Sacchetti B, Funari A, Remoli C, Giannicola G, Kogler G, Liedtke S, et al. No identical “mesenchymal stem cells” at different times and sites: human committed progenitors of distinct origin and differentiation potential are incorporated as adventitial cells in microvessels. Stem Cell Reports. 2016;6:897–913.

  148. 148.

    Fukada S, Uezumi A, Ikemoto M, Masuda S, Segawa M, Tanimura N, et al. Molecular signature of quiescent satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2448–59.

  149. 149.

    Cornelison DD, Filla MS, Stanley HM, Rapraeger AC, Olwin BB. Syndecan-3 and syndecan-4 specifically mark skeletal muscle satellite cells and are implicated in satellite cell maintenance and muscle regeneration. Dev Biol. 2001;239:79–94.

  150. 150.

    Fukada S, Higuchi S, Segawa M, Koda K, Yamamoto Y, Tsujikawa K, et al. Purification and cell-surface marker characterization of quiescent satellite cells from murine skeletal muscle by a novel monoclonal antibody. Exp Cell Res. 2004;296:245–55.

  151. 151.

    Beauchamp JR, Heslop L, Yu DS, Tajbakhsh S, Kelly RG, Wernig A, et al. Expression of CD34 and Myf5 defines the majority of quiescent adult skeletal muscle satellite cells. J Cell Biol. 2000;151:1221–34.

  152. 152.

    Gnocchi VF, White RB, Ono Y, Ellis JA, Zammit PS. Further characterisation of the molecular signature of quiescent and activated mouse muscle satellite cells. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5205.

  153. 153.

    Maesner CC, Almada AE, Wagers AJ. Established cell surface markers efficiently isolate highly overlapping populations of skeletal muscle satellite cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Skelet Muscle. 2016;6:35.

  154. 154.

    Capkovic KL, Stevenson S, Johnson MC, Thelen JJ, Cornelison DD. Neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) marks adult myogenic cells committed to differentiation. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:1553–65.

  155. 155.

    Schubert W, Zimmermann K, Cramer M, Starzinski-Powitz A. Lymphocyte antigen Leu-19 as a molecular marker of regeneration in human skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:307–11.

  156. 156.

    Sajko S, Kubinova L, Cvetko E, Kreft M, Wernig A, Erzen I. Frequency of M-cadherin-stained satellite cells declines in human muscles during aging. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52:179–85.

  157. 157.

    Castiglioni A, Hettmer S, Lynes MD, Rao TN, Tchessalova D, Sinha I, et al. Isolation of progenitors that exhibit myogenic/osteogenic bipotency in vitro by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from human fetal muscle. Stem Cell Rep. 2014;2:92–106.

  158. 158.

    Alexander MS, Rozkalne A, Colletta A, Spinazzola JM, Johnson S, Rahimov F, et al. CD82 is a marker for prospective isolation of human muscle satellite cells and is linked to muscular dystrophies. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19:800–7.

  159. 159.

    Oishi T, Uezumi A, Kanaji A, Yamamoto N, Yamaguchi A, Yamada H, et al. Osteogenic differentiation capacity of human skeletal muscle-derived progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56641.

  160. 160.

    Liadaki K, Casar JC, Wessen M, Luth ES, Jun S, Gussoni E, et al. beta4 integrin marks interstitial myogenic progenitor cells in adult murine skeletal muscle. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60:31–44.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by the Leading Scholar Award to PH in Jilin University, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31771624) and the Science Technology Commission of Jilin Province (Grant No. 20180101145JC).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Author information

ST and PH conceived the idea, performed literature search, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Shuzhi Teng or Ping Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional information

Shuzhi Teng and Ping Huang are co-corresponding authors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teng, S., Huang, P. The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity on muscle progenitor cell function. Stem Cell Res Ther 10, 103 (2019) doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1186-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Satellite cell
  • muscle progenitor cell
  • T2DM
  • Obesity