Skip to main content

Multiocular organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells displayed retinal, corneal, and retinal pigment epithelium lineages

Abstract

Background

Recently, great efforts have been made to design protocols for obtaining ocular cells from human stem cells to model diseases or for regenerative purposes. Current protocols generally focus on isolating retinal cells, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), or corneal cells and fail to recapitulate the complexity of the tissue during eye development. Here, the generation of more advanced in vitro multiocular organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) is demonstrated.

Methods

A 2-step method was established to first obtain self-organized multizone ocular progenitor cells (mzOPCs) from 2D hiPSC cultures within three weeks. Then, after the cells were manually isolated and grown in suspension, 3D multiocular organoids were generated to model important cellular features of developing eyes.

Results

In the 2D culture, self-formed mzOPCs spanned the neuroectoderm, surface ectoderm, neural crest, and RPE, mimicking early stages of eye development. After lifting, mzOPCs developed into different 3D multiocular organoids composed of multiple cell lineages including RPE, retina, and cornea, and interactions between the different cell types and regions of the eye system were observed. Within these organoids, the retinal regions exhibited correct layering and contained all major retinal cell subtypes as well as retinal morphological cues, whereas the corneal regions closely resembled the transparent ocular-surface epithelium and contained of corneal, limbal, and conjunctival epithelial cells. The arrangement of RPE cells also formed organoids composed of polarized pigmented epithelial cells at the surface that were completely filled with collagen matrix.

Conclusions

This approach clearly demonstrated the advantages of the combined 2D-3D construction tissue model as it provided a more ocular native-like cellular environment than that of previous models. In this complex preparations, multiocular organoids may be used to model the crosstalk between different cell types in eye development and disease.

Graphical abstract

Background

The eye is a complex organ comprising different specialized ocular tissues that together are responsible for vision. Diseases or injuries affecting ocular tissues are causing increasing global problems, as they cause partial or total vision loss and affect approximately 2.2 billion people worldwide [1]. The eye is divided into anterior and posterior segments. The posterior segment is composed of the retina, the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the choroid. During eye development, the neuroretina (NR) (as well as the RPE) is derived from the anterior neuroectoderm, and retinal progenitor cells produce all types of retinal neurons (including photoreceptors, bipolar cells, amacrine cells, horizontal cells, and ganglion cells) and Müller glia in a sequential manner [2, 3]. Photoreceptors, the light sensing cells that are among the most important retinal neurons responsible for vision together with RPE, are responsible for visual function [4]. On the other hand, the anterior segment of the eye is composed of the cornea, conjunctiva, limbus, lens and iris, which are derived from the lens placode that arises from the surface ectoderm (SE). The cornea is the outer layer of the eye, is developed from the SE and controls and focuses the entry of light into the eye. This transparent layer is formed by a stratified epithelium in the outer section, a collagen-rich stroma that is maintained by keratocytes, and the endothelium in the inner part [5]. The conjunctiva covers the sclera and is composed of 3–5 layers of epithelium with superficial scattered goblet cells that produce important mucins for the tear film. The limbus limits the cornea and conjunctiva, and it contains stem cells that are key for preserving corneal integrity by renewing corneal epithelium (CE); these cells are used for regenerative purposes [6]. Moreover, the neural crest (NC)-mesenchymal ectoderm-derived component contributes to from the corneal stroma and endothelium, ciliary body, and melanocytes [7].

Currently, much effort has been made to regenerate damaged or diseased retinas, RPE, and corneas by utilizing cell-based therapies to restore visual function. Since the discovery of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) [8] and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) [9], disease modeling, organoids, and cell therapy testing have contributed to finding promising therapeutic strategies to treat ocular diseases [10]. This is particularly interesting for studies involving eyes, which are composed of different highly specialized tissues derived from various cell linages, including neuroectoderm, SE, NC and the periocular mesenchyme [11]. hESC and hiPSC-derived ocular organoids have been described to endogenously recapitulate the architecture and cellular organization, and function of native ocular embryonic tissues [12]; this occurs because higher and more natural complexities are achieved and because they allow the generation of clinically relevant cell numbers and ratios, including their own stroma [13,14,15,16]. These ocular organoids are useful for regenerating ocular tissue by generating appropriate RPE [17], retinal [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], limbal [15] and corneal [29] cells for transplant therapies, and also could be used for modeling diseases involving both anterior and posterior parts of the eye, such as anophthalmia, microphthalmia, and ocular malformations, or rare ocular diseases of the neural crest caused by mutations in the eye-field transcription factors SOX2, RAX, PAX6, PAX3, SOX10 and CHX10 [30,31,32,33,34].

New methodologies to produce highly organized well-delimited zones of ocular tissues, such as retinal, corneal, limbal, conjunctival, RPE and lens progenitor cells have recently been developed [29, 35,36,37,38]. The self-formed ectodermal autonomous multizone (SEAM) of ocular cells from hiPSCs in a two-dimensional (2D) culture approach better emulates the complexities of ocular morphogenesis and might be a promising source for different ocular cells; however, current experimental designs only focus on the isolation of a single cell type, such as retinal or corneal cells, and they cannot recreate the intricate 3D ocular organization [29, 36, 38]. Moreover, the processes of generating conventional ocular-like tissue, which are crucial for multilineage communication and are required for tissue development, remains incomplete as they lack stromal components. Accordingly, strategies to improve the high-level organization of complex 3D ocular tissue, including the crosstalk between different ocular structures, are still needed.

Here, hiPSCs-derived mutizone ocular progenitor cultures in 2D were used to develop 3D multiocular organoids containing a combination of retina, cornea, conjunctiva, and RPE regions, and together with keratocytes, they produced stromal-like tissue (including collagen type I and IV). The 3D ocular organoids obtained possess the unique advantage of recapitulating the multiregional cytoarchitecture seen in early human eye development. Although multiocular organoids do not display native ocular tissue organization, they more closely model the important cellular features of developing eyes.

Methods

Human induced pluripotent stem cell culture

Two hiPSC lines were used in this study. The human cord blood-derived iPSC line CBiPS30-4F-5 (CB30) [39] and the fibroblast-derived iPSC line FiPS-4F-7 (FiPS) [40] were obtained from the Spanish National Stem Cell Bank after approval by the Ethics Review Board and the Catalan Authority for Stem Cells. Both iPSC lines were cultured and expanded in Matrigel-coated (Corning, NY, USA) plates in mTeSR1 medium (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). The cells were passaged with 1 mM EDTA at a ratio of 1:4–1:6 every 5–7 days, and the medium was changed every day. The cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Differentiation of hiPSCs into multizone ocular progenitor cells

The differentiation protocol is depicted in Fig. 1 and was previously described [40]. Briefly, eye-field induction was performed using 75% confluent hiPSCs cultured on Matrigel (Corning, NY, USA) in induction medium (IM) consisting of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12), 5% fetal bovine serum, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 2 mM GlutaMax, 1% N2, 1% B27 (all the previous reagents were from Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 10 mM β‐glycerol phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), recombinant human IGF1 (10 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 10 mM nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with Noggin (10 ng/ml; Peprotech EC Ltd., London, UK), DKK1 (10 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and bFGF (10 ng/ml; Peprotech EC Ltd., London, UK). Medium was changed every other day for 30 days. At day 30, the cell culture consisted of multizone ocular progenitor cells (mzOPCs) forming the following ocular-specific structures: surface ectoderm, neural crest, lens, stromal cells, NR, and RPE.

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of the hiPSC differentiation protocol for multizone ocular progenitor cells and multiocular organoids. A, B Schemes of the differentiation protocol for the 2D generation of multizone ocular progenitor cells (mzOPCs) consisting of neuroectoderm, surface ectoderm and neural crest structures. At day 30, mzOPCs were manually picked and developed in suspension into 3D multiocular, retinal, corneal, and RPE organoids. Abbreviations: ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; DIV, days in vitro; DKK1, Dickkopf WNT Signaling Pathway Inhibitor 1; hiPSC, human induced pluripotent stem cells; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; T3, triiodothyronine; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium

Generation of multiocular organoids and individual retinal, corneal and RPE organoids

At day 30, mzOPC cultures were manually picked under a microscope with Stripper® tips (Cooper Surgical, Trumbull, CT, USA) and cultured to generate multiocular organoids. All organoids were grown in low-attachment plate in the same dish with IM supplemented with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA, 10 µM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 60 days. During this period, multiocular organoids were formed. Alternatively, individual retinal, corneal/conjunctival or RPE organoids could be generated or isolated from multiocular organoids (Fig. 1A, B). At day 90, multiocular organoids as well as RPE and retinal organoids were separated and cultured in IM supplemented with triiodothyronine (T3, 20 nM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to allow photoreceptor maturation and RPE pigmentation to occur (Fig. 1A), whereas multiocular and corneal organoids were kept in ATRA in order for the corneal-like tissue to maintain transparency. IM was replenished every other day for 140 days. Moreover, RPE organoids were disaggregated in TrypLE Select (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and cultured on Matrigel-coated plates in IM as described [41,42,43] to obtain an RPE cell monolayer. Because the RPE organoids contained mostly RPE cells and collagen matrix, purifying the RPE cell culture was not necessary. The functional characterization of the RPE cell culture is described in the Additional file 1 [40].

Histology and immunochemistry

The organoids and cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA; EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) overnight at 4 °C and washed in phosphate saline buffer (PBS). The organoids were then embedded in paraffin and cut into 5 µm sections. For immunohistochemistry tests, paraffin sections were deparaffined, and antigens were retrieved using citrate buffer (pH 6) at 100 °C. Paraffin-embedded sections, pieces of organoids or cells were permeabilized and blocked in 1 × PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) and 6% donkey serum (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 6% donkey serum and incubated overnight at 4 °C or for 2 h at 37 °C, respectively. The primary antibodies are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI). Confocal images were acquired using a DM6000 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and Zeiss LSM 980 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and processed using ImageJ (ImageJ software; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Electron microscopy

Electron microscopy was performed as described [41]. Briefly, for transmission electron microscopy studies, hiPSC-derived retinal and corneal organoids were fixed with 4% PFA for 1 h at 4 °C followed by 2.5% (w/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.2–7.4 for 2 h at 4 °C. The samples postfixation was carried out in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4 °C. Then, dehydration was performed in an ascending ethanol series and the samples were embedded in epoxy resin (all reagents were from EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections were examined on a JEOL JEM-1011 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). For the scanning electron microscopy examinations, hiPSC-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells were fixed and dehydrated as described above. The cells were dried with a critical point dryer and metalized, and they were examined using a JEOL JSM-6390LV scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total messenger RNA was isolated from the cells and organoids using PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 1 µg of mRNA was reverse transcribed with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse-Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) [44]. For standard PCR, cDNA (10 ng) was amplified using MyTaq Red DNA Polymerase (Bioline, London, UK) by a standard amplification program as follows: a hot start activation (95 °C for 5 min), denaturing step (95 °C for 30 s), annealing step (60 °C for 30 s) and extension step (72 °C for 30 s), which was repeated for 35 cycles. PCR products were visualized by 2% agarose gels. For RT-qPCR, cDNA (10 ng in triplicate) was amplified using a SYBR Green Master kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions [40]. RT-qPCR reactions were run on the ABI PRISM 7900HT platform (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and cycle threshold (Ct) values were normalized using GAPDH as a housekeeping gene. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔCt method. The primer sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent measurements. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). An unpaired two-tailored Student’s t-test was applied to determine statistical significances between 2 groups. For more than 2 groups, one-way or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test and significant differences (P < 0.05) were utilized.

Results

Multizone ocular precursor cells organized into neuroectoderm, neural crest and surface ectoderm areas

Eye field commitment in the 2D hiPSC cultures was induced by inhibiting BMP and Wnt pathways using noggin and DKK1 antagonists, respectively [45], and by activating FGF and IGF-1 pathways [37, 46] (Fig. 1A). This led to the spontaneous formation of well-delimited neuroepithelium (NE) and surface ectoderm (SE) zones beginning at 10 days in vitro (DIV), and they continued to form until 30 DIV in both the CB30 (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Figure S1) and FiPS (Additional file 1: Figure S2) cell lines. During the differentiation procedure, multizone ocular precursor cells (mzOPCs) self-formed a concentric arrangement with distinct cell morphologies (Fig. 2A; Additional file 1: Figures S1A-B and S2A), which was similar to SEAM protocols [29, 35, 36]. The innermost zone corresponded to the well-formed NR with a characteristically round shape, and it had clear margins and an early laminated apical layer containing retinal precursor cells that expressed PAX6, TUJ1, CHX10 and RAX (Fig. 2A, B; Additional file 1: Figures S1C and S2B). The second zone, corresponded to RPE cells that expressed MITF. And in the outermost zone, the SE contained cells that expressed CK19 and p63, lentoid cluster cells that expressed γ-crystallin, and stroma-like cells that expressed vimentin (VIM). Neural crest (NC) cells expressing SOX9, p75-NGFR and SOX10 were also present in the SE close to the NR (Fig. 2B; Additional file 1: Figures S1A-C and S2B). Similarly, mzOPCs expressed the eye-field transcription factors PAX6, RAX, SIX3, SIX6 and LHX2, the NR-specific CHX10, the photoreceptor-specific CRX, SE markers p63 and CK19, the RPE-specific marker MITF, and NC markers PAX3, SOX9 and TFAP2A. The pluripotency marker OCT4 was not expressed at this stage (Fig. 2C; Additional file 1: Figures S2C, S5C and S6A). These results increase our understanding of embryogenesis and provide a method by which the relative induction of eye-field-committed precursor cells that span the RPE, retinal, SE, NC, lens, and stromal cells can be modulated. From here, mzOPC clusters were manually isolated in an attempt to generate free-floating 3D multiocular organoids.

Fig. 2
figure2

Multizone ocular progenitor cells expanded the neuroectoderm, surface ectoderm and neural crest cell regions. A Representative phase-contrast images of CB30 hiPSC differentiation toward multizone ocular progenitor cells (mzOPCs). The images of mzOPCs at 10 (D10), 20 (D20) and 30 (D30) DIV show the eye-field primordial clusters that develop in neuroectoderm (NE), surface ectoderm (SE), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and neural retina (NR) (n > 8 independent experiments). Scale bars: 500 µm. B Immunofluorescence images of hiPSCs expressing the pluripotency stem cell markers NANOG, TRA-1-81, OCT4, SSEA3, SOX2, SSEA4 and TRA-1-60 (a–c). mzOPCs at 10 DIV (d–f) and at day 20 (g–i) expressed NE-specific markers PAX6, NRL, and MITF; SE-specific markers CK19 and p63; and neural crest (NC)-markers SOX9, SOX10 and p75-NGFR. At day 30 (j–l), mzOPCs consisted of differentiated ocular clusters, including NR (RAX, TUJ1, PAX6); RPE (MITF); surface epithelial cells (CK19) and neural crest cells (SOX9). Nuclei were stained in DAPI. Scale bars: 100 µm in a–c, g, h, j,k; 50 µm in e, f,l; 25 µm in d, i. C Relative gene expression detected by RT-qPCR in hiPSCs and mzOPCs at 30 DIV of eye-field transcription factors PAX6, RAX, SIX6, SE markers p63 and CK19, the RPE-specific marker MITF, and the pluripotency marker OCT4. Values are normalized to GAPDH. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Values indicated with stars are significantly different from those in hiPSCs (Student’s t-test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001)

Multiocular organoids exhibited neuroretinal, pigmented epithelium and corneal-conjunctival regions

Multiocular organoids were obtained from mzOPC and cultured in low-attachment plates (Figs. 1B, 3A; Additional file 1: Figure S3, S4 and S5). As a result, this process increased the proportion of large multiregion organoids in 3D culture that exhibited variable ocular tissues. The tissues were composed of multiple ocular identities, such as the following: (i) retina, RPE and cornea (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Figures S3 and S4); (ii) retina and cornea (Additional file 1: Figure S4); (iii) retina and RPE (Fig. 3); and (iv) cornea and RPE (Additional file 1: Figure S5). Moreover, individual retinal, corneal, or RPE organoids were also obtained (Figs. 4, 5 and 6, respectively).

Fig. 3
figure3

Multiocular organoids were composed of neuroretina, pigmented region and corneal-like epithelium and endothelium, and conjunctiva. A Bright field and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) images of CB30-derived multiocular organoids at 90 DIV showing the following different ocular regions: neuroretina, pigmented area, and corneal-like. Scale bars: 3 mm (left image); 500 µm in bright field; 250 µm in HE. B HE and confocal images of representative multiocular organoid paraffin sections at 90 DIV consisting of pigmented epithelium (PE; bestrophin-1 (BEST)), corneal epithelium (CE; CK19 and CK5), neuroretina (NR; NRL and TUJ1), stromal cells (vimentin (VIM)), and collagen type IV (COL IV)). Scale bars: 500 µm. C HE (a, f, i) and confocal images of detailed ocular areas. NR expressed VIM, PAX6 and TUJ1 in the inner layer and recoverin (RECOV) in the outer layer (a–e), CE expressed CK3 (corneal marker) and CK19 (conjunctival marker) (g, h), and PE expressed MITF (RPE marker) and COL IV. Scale bars: 50 µm. Nuclei were stained with DAPI

Fig. 4
figure4

Development and organization of the retinal layer within retinal organoids generated from CB30-derived mzOPCs. A (Left-middle) Bright-field images of retinal organoids derived from the CB30 hiPSC line at 140 DIV. The arrows indicate developing retinal tissue, and arrowheads indicate developing photoreceptor inner/outer segments. (Right) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of paraffin sections showing lamination of retinal tissue. Scale bars: 300 µm (left); 100 µm (middle); 50 µm (right). B RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression in mzOPCs at 30 DIV and retinal organoids at 70 (RO d70) and 140 DIV (RO d140). Values are normalized to GAPDH. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests were performed, and significant differences are represented with *p < 0.001 vs. OPC; #p < 0.001 RO d70 vs. RO d140. C Confocal images of retinal organoid paraffin sections at 140 DIV immunostained with photoreceptor cell markers CRX, RECOV, rhodopsin (RHO), RG-opsin, and pericentrin (PERI) (a–d) corresponding to the outer nuclear layer (ONL); bipolar cell markers CHX10 and PKC-alpha and horizontal cell markers CALB (calbindin-28 K) (e–g) corresponding to the inner nuclear layer (INL); ganglion cell markers TUJ1 and PAX6 (i, j) corresponding to the ganglion cell layer (GCL); and synaptic markers SYNAP (synaptophysin) and vGLUT1 (k, l) corresponding to the outer plexiform layer (OPL). Scale bars: 100 µm in I, j; 25 µm in a–h, k, l. D Transmission electron microscopy analysis of retinal organoids at 140 DIV shows several retinal structures of connecting cilia (CC), inner segments (IS), mitochondria (mt), outer limiting membrane (OLM), outer segments (OS) and ribbon synapses (RS). Scale bars: 10 µm (a, b); 2 µm (c); 1 µm (d); 0.5 µm (e, f, g); 0.2 µm (h)

Fig. 5
figure5

Corneal organoids exhibited areas of conjunctiva and areas of CE and endothelium. A Bright-field images of developing corneal-like organoids derived from CB30 hiPSCs cultured for 35 (D35), 80 (D80), and 140 (D140) DIV. Scale bar: 300 µm in a–c; 1 mm in d; 2 mm in e. B Hematoxylin and eosin staining of corneal organoids at 140 DIV. Corneal organoids with stromal lumen (a, b, f). The dashed squared in (a) indicates magnified image in (b). Stratified surface epithelium (c) with collagen-filled stroma resembling native mouse cornea (d). Corneal organoids with fluid-filled stroma and an endothelium-like layer (e, g, h). Dashed squares in (e) indicate magnified images in (g, h). Scale bars: 300 µm in a, e; 50 µm in b, f–h; 25 µm in c, d. C Immunohistochemistry of the surface epithelium stained with cytokeratin 19 (CK19) (top panel). Scale bar: 10 µm. Transmission electron microscopy image of corneal organoids at 140 DIV showing corneal epithelial cells with apical microvilli (arrows), tight junctions between cells (arrowheads) and cell nuclei (N) (bottom panel). Scale bar: 5 µm. D RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression in mzOPCs at 30 DIV and in corneal organoids at 100 (CO d100) and 140 DIV (CO d140). Values were normalized to GAPDH. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests were performed, and significant differences are represented with *p < 0.001 vs. OPC; #p < 0.001 CO d100 vs. CO d140. E Confocal images of immunostained corneal organoids at 140 DIV showing surface conjunctiva/limbal cells expressing CK5 (a, f, k), CK19 (b, g, l) and Na+/K+-ATPase (Na/K; k), corneal epithelial cells expressing PAX6 (h, m), cytokeratin 3 (CK3; n) and corneal endothelium expressing aquaporin-1 (AQP1) and N-CAD (o); and stroma containing cells positive for collagen type IV (COL IV; c, j), collagen type I (COL I; i) and vimentin (VIM) (d). The surface epithelium was delimited by COL IV and I, with p63 + cells on the apical side and some PAX6 + cells on the basal side (h, i, j). The cytoskeleton was stained with actin (e). Scale bars: 250 µm (a, b); 50 µm (c–e, k–n); 25 µm (f–j, o). Nuclei were stained with DAPI

Fig. 6
figure6

Retinal pigment epithelial organoids acquired pigmentation in the presence of T3 hormone. A (a) Phase contrast microscopy images of CB30-derived mzOPCs cultured for 30 days showing neuroretinal areas (NRs) surrounded by RPE cells. Scale bar: 250 µm. (b–d) Bright-field images of CB30-derived RPE organoids cultured in suspension for 120 days in the presence of T3 from day 90. Scale bars: 3 mm in b; 1 mm in c; 25 µm in d. B Hematoxylin and eosin staining of RPE organoid paraffin sections. The dashed square in b indicates the magnification area shown in c. Scale bars: 100 µm in b; 50 µm in a, c, d. C (a) Immunostaining of a paraffin section with antibodies against MITF and COL IV (B-a and C-a images correspond to the same sections). Confocal immunofluorescence images of the RPE organoid surface with the following RPE-specific markers: RPE65, MITF, ZO-1, BEST (bestrophin-1), and CD59 (b-d). Tra-1-60 was used to detect undifferentiated cells. Scale bars: 50 µm in a; 25 µm in b, d; 7.5 µm in c. Nuclei were stained with DAPI

Analysis of large multiocular organoids (~ 1.5 mm) revealed that these organoids were formed by pigmented epithelium (BEST +), followed by NR (VIM + , NRL + and TUJ1 +) and a corneal-like region (CK5 + and CK19 +) (Fig. 3B). The internal corneal epithelium (CE) area was filled with stroma (COL IV). We then characterized different ocular tissues within the multiocular organoids in more detail. In the areas with laminated NR, the cells expressed PAX6 and TUJ1 filled with stromal cells (VIM) and collagen IV in the inner retinal layer and expressed recoverin and CRX corresponding to photoreceptor cells in the outer layer (Fig. 3C-a-e; Additional file 1: Figures S3, S4 and S5). The CE consisted of corneal epithelial cells (CK3), endothelium-like cells (AQP1 and N-CAD) (Fig. 3C-f-g; Additional file 1: Figure S3-n, o) [47] and conjunctival-limbal epithelium areas (CK19, CK5, Na+/K+-ATPase, SSEA1 and mucin-1) [6] filled with collagen type IV and stoma cells (VIM) (Fig. 3B and C-h; Additional file 1: Figure S3 and S4). Moreover, some areas showed a pigmented epithelium (PE) expressing MITF and bestrophin 1 (Fig. 3B and C-i, j; Additional file 1: Figure S3B and S5).

Individual organoids could be obtained from mzOPCs by isolating specific areas and also from multiocular organoids. To do this, we sectioned each part of these large organoids between days 60 and 90 and cultured them as a single retinal, RPE or corneal organoid (Figs. 4, 5 and 6). We calculated the efficiency of each type of organoid production, which was counted at day 90 of the differentiation processes beginning with the 75% confluent CB30 and FiPS cultures. From 1-well of a 6-well plate, we obtained 23.5 ± 4 multiocular or 53.3 ± 5 individual organoids (n = 5) from the CB30 line and 19.6 ± 7 multiocular or 56.6 ± 7 individual organoids (n = 4) from the FiPS line. The utility of stem cell-derived ocular organoids for disease modeling or drug screening depends upon the cellular and functional maturation of the different ocular cells within these organoids. To test this hypothesis, we focused on characterizing individual organoids.

Neuroretinal structures produce 3D retinal organoids

Isolating NR areas produced retinal organoids that exhibited bright laminated retinal structures with a continuous cell layer, which was observed at 40 DIV by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining (Additional file 1: Figure S7A). The retinal progenitor cells in the retinal organoids coexpressed RAX and PAX6 and were scattered throughout the epithelium. Retinal cells at the apical side of the organoid expressed SOX2, NRL, CHX10, ZO-1 and recoverin, which corresponded to a developing outer nuclear layer (ONL); while TUJ1 staining was localized to the inner part of the structure, mimicking a developing ganglion cell layer (GCL) (Additional file 1: Figure S7B).

Retinal organoids were clearly larger and more mature at day 140 DIV and acquired a 3D-stratified retinal structure with a discrete apical layer (Fig. 4A). RT-qPCR analysis showed an increase in the expression of the photoreceptor-specific transcripts CRX, RAX, LHX2, recoverin and rhodopsin in retinal organoids at day 70, and it was maintained up to day 140. At both time points, NR2E3, RHO and MITF expression was increased and SIX6 expression was decreased (Fig. 4B; Additional file 1: Figure S7C). Immunohistochemistry showed that cells within the well-organized ONL coexpressed the photoreceptor markers CRX, recoverin, rhodopsin and RG-opsin (Fig. 4C-a-c). Recoverin + cells harbored inner and outer segments (IS/OS) of photoreceptors on the apical surface expressing pericentrin in the connecting cilia (Fig. 4C-d). Cells in the INL expressed CHX10, PKCα and calbindin, although it was less evident, and these corresponded to bipolar and horizontal cells (Fig. 4C-e–g). In contrast, cells in the inner part of the organoid expressed GFAP, AP2, TUJ1 and PAX6, corresponding to ganglion cells in the developing GCL, and were surrounded and supported by extracellular matrix protein collagen IV (Fig. 4C-h-j). PAX6 exhibited a expression pattern that descended from the GCL toward the ONL (Fig. 4C-i), mimicking the developing human retina at 130 days of gestation [48]. The expression of synaptophysin and vGLUT1 demonstrated the synaptic connection between photoreceptors and secondary neurons in a developing outer plexiform layer (OPL) (Fig. 4C-k, l). Ultrastructural analysis of retinal organoids at 70 DIV by transmission electron microscopy showed partially segregated cells in the ONL that contained photoreceptor IS with mitochondria, outer limiting membrane, and photoreceptor OS structures containing basal bodies with protruding cilia and synaptic vesicles (Additional file 1: Figure S7D). At 140 DIV, the presence of photoreceptor-specific sensory cilia, including IS- and OS-containing intracellular membrane discs and photoreceptor ribbon synapses, corroborated their maturation (Fig. 4D).

Surface ectoderm areas form 3D corneal organoids

Isolated SE zones consist of multipotent cells that can produce corneal organoids with multiple lineages, including CE, conjunctiva and limbus, NC-derived CE and stromal cells [5, 49]. Corneal organoids (organoids composed of CE, endothelium, or conjunctiva) were spherical with a translucent/transparent layer (Figs. 5A and 6B). Their size could be increased over time from 0.5 to 3 mm. At DIV 140, the paraffin section HE staining results revealed that the translucent organoids consisted of corneal/conjunctival-like stratified epithelium and lumen filled with stroma (Fig. 5B-a-f) that resembled the native corneal structure (Fig. 3B-compare c and d). The transparent organoids also consisted of simple squamous epithelium similar to the corneal endothelium-like membrane and fluid-filled lumen that collapsed after fixation (Fig. 5B-e, g, h). The TEM results revealed areas with 1–2 cell-thick layers that were formed by simple columnar cells expressing CK19, forming an epithelium with pronounced nucleoli rich in keratin filaments, tight junctions and apical microvilli, which is typical of transit-amplifying epithelial cells (Fig. 5C) [50]. Expression of conjunctival/limbal genes p63 and Na+/K+-ATPase, corneal genes CK12, CK3, PAX6, COL8A1, COL8A2 and AQP1, and the RPE gene MITF in the corneal organoids was corroborated by PCR and qPCR (Fig. 5D; Additional file 1: Figure S8A).

Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that several organoids contained conjunctival/limbal-like cell clusters expressing CK19, CK5 and p63, suggesting there was a primitive epithelial surface (Fig. 5E-a, b, f, g,j-l; Additional file 1: Figure S8B). We observed a more developed layer of stratified squamous cells containing 3–6 cell nuclei with slightly different cell shapes that depended on their basal or apical location (Fig. 5E-e-l). The internal lumen was filled with stromal keratocytes that expressed vimentin and deposited collagen types I and IV, which in turn formed a Bowman’s-like membrane (Fig. 5E-c, d, i, j; Additional file 1: Figure S8B and S8C). Bowman’s membrane maintained the corneal structural integrity of corneal organoids during maturation, which allowed it to have a spherical shape. In contrast, the fluid-filled stoma was surrounded by either Na+/K+-ATPase endothelial-like cells or by a thin layer of stromal cells that expressed aquaporin-1 and N-cadherin (Fig. 5E-o; Additional file 1: Figure S8C-e). Moreover, PAX6 expression was evident in the basal cells, whereas p63 + cells were present at the apical surface (Fig. 5E-h, j). In some areas, there was a clear transition between conjunctival-like epithelia (CK19 + , CK5 + , Na+/K+-ATPase + , p63 + cell niche) and corneal-like epithelium (PAX6 + and CK3 +) (Fig. 5E-k–n; Additional file 1: Figure S6B and S8B). Interestingly, a few pigmented cells were also observed at the periphery of some organoids (Additional file 1: Figure S8B-g), indicating the potential presence of ciliary margin zone-like pigmented cells derived from nonneural progenitors, which contribute to stromal cell infiltration and ocular-surface formation [38, 51, 52].

RPE organoids acquired polarization and pigmentation

RPE organoids were obtained either by isolating the RPE cell regions surrounding the NR in mzOPCs or by separating RPE regions from multiocular organoids (Fig. 6A; Additional file 1: Figure S6C and S9), similar to the report by Liu et al. [53] and Susaimanickam et al. [38]. After removing ATRA at day 90 in culture, RPE organoids acquired pigmentation (Fig. 6A-b-d; Additional file 1: Figure S9A). RPE cells at the periphery of the organoids formed a cell monolayer with apical polarization toward the outermost part of the organoid, and in the basolateral site, RPE cells produced considerable collagen IV, which is a component of the underlying Bruch’s membrane, and filled the organoid lumen (Fig. 6B and C-a; Additional file 1: Figure S6C-c). RPE cells in these organoids expressed RPE65, MITF, ZO1, bestrophin, CD59, and CD140, but not Tra-1–60, a marker of pluripotency (Fig. 6C-b-c; Additional file 1: Figure S6C-d-f). From these organoids, RPE cells could be isolated and cultures as a cell monolayer. The resulting RPE monolayer expressed PAX6, MITF, bestrophin, CHX10 and ZO-1 (Additional file 1: Figure S9B). RPE cell culture exhibited the typical hexagonal cell shape with apical microvilli, melanin-containing melanosomes and tight junctions between cells (Additional file 1: Figure S9C). Pigmentation of RPE cells was coincident with functional maturation. To assess whether the RPE organoids and isolated RPE cells retained correct functionality in vitro, we tested their phagocytosis capacity and barrier functions. Cultured RPE cells phagocytosed FITC-labeled photoreceptor outer segments that appeared in the cytoplasm (Additional file 1: Figure S9D). Moreover, the epithelial barrier of RPE in culture, which was measured by TEER, exhibited an increased resistance after 3 weeks and reached 250 Ώ·cm2 (Additional file 1: Figure S9E). These results suggested that RPE cells derived from RPE organoids exhibited mature cell morphology and function.

Discussion

While tremendous progress has been made in understanding the highly complex mechanisms involved in eye-field differentiation, current in vitro protocols fail to emulate the spatial cellular organization of the eye. Most differentiation protocols using hiPSC-derived ocular cells and organoids focus on a single tissue-specific lineage, which fail to reflect the tissue complexity of eye development. With the aim of assessing how different ocular cell tissues organize and interact with each other within the same organoid, we demonstrated the remarkable ability of multiocular organoids to self-organize from mzOPCs in suspension and to form distinct eye structures, such as the retina, cornea and RPE, which are interconnected.

The aim of this study was to obtain an organoid system model that could generate complex ocular organoids from the same hiPSC culture, or basically from the same individual. It is necessary to employ all types of ocular progenitors to proceed with the formation of multiocular organoids by self-arrangement, but they have not been obtained altogether using embryoid bodies-based protocols yet. The reason for initiating differentiation from a 2D culture system is that 3D systems are not that effective in generating anterior eye tissue such as the cornea, although they have shown a high capacity to develop retinal organoids [54]. Therefore, for the initial induction of differentiation, we used a 2D culture approach to generate mzOPCs for the early stage of eye-field differentiation based on our [40] and previous studies on SEAM ocular cells [29, 35, 36, 40, 55] with some modifications. The differentiation started with 75% confluent hiPSC cultures instead of single colonies, which led to spontaneous self-formation of NE and SE areas across the plate [38, 56]. We observed that in mzOPC cultures, multiple zones were usually round but also had elongated shapes that varied in size, and they were formed by 3–4 rings, in contrast to other SEAM protocols that produced round multizones with 3–5 different concentric rings, as they were started from single colonies [29, 35, 53]. The efficiency usually ranged from 60 to 120 multizones per well of a 6-well plate resulting in high number of multiocular organoids with no significant differences between both cell lines.

Following the formation of ocular tissue-specific areas within the mzOPC stage, the subsequent stages of ocular organoid development in 3D were driven by ocular structures self-refolding, which prevented its disruption and maintained cell–cell interactions, cell numbers and cell signaling [57]. It is particularly interesting to study the crosstalk between different eye structures. The composition of multiocular organoids was demonstrated to vary and create more complex structures formed by RPE-retina-cornea or simpler structures containing retina-RPE, retina-cornea or RPE-cornea. This suggests that communication among ocular cell types can occur through specialized surface cell interactions or by secreted factors, as we observed different maturation stages or an increased number of corneal cells (CK3+) in multiocular organoids compared to individual corneal organoids. Moreover, tissue interactions between NR and RPE or between conjunctiva and cornea may foster stem cell niches containing ciliary margin-like or limbal-like growth zones. Taken together, we now showed that self-organizing multiocular organoids may not only generate highly organized ocular structures, but also orchestrate native oculogenesis. Despite that, it is clear that multiocular organoids do not form a true eye or possess a properly localized RPE layer, nor do they contain relevant non-neuroectodermal lineages, such as mesoderm.

Within these complex ocular organoids, retinal tissue has been demonstrated to mimic native human retinal tissue spatiotemporal development in a way that cannot be observed in animal models [58]. During early eye development, retinal progenitors emerge from PAX6 + cells in the early eye-field, which in turn require RAX and CHX10 to proliferate [59]. Likewise, retinal cells that differentiated as 2D monolayers in the mzOPC expressed important retinal markers (PAX6, RAX, LHX2, SIX3, and SIX6), and the retinal neuroepithelium self-organized to form NR structures [60]. These NR regions were composed of a heterogeneous mix of retinal cells containing each major retinal cell type that organized into laminated structures. Once lifted, the NR formed retinal organoids consisting of layered structures with the main photoreceptor subtypes, including photoreceptors with rhodopsin, L/M-opsin and S-opsin in the outer retina and ganglion cells in the inner part, which emulated many of the temporal and spatial characteristics of in vivo development [61]. During human retinal development, photoreceptor OS emerge and elongate at weeks 16–20 of gestation [48], coinciding with the emergence of OS in our retinal organoids observed at day 140 (week 20). The OS observed had very few or disorganized disk stacks, which was likely due to the immaturity of the organoid. Electron microscopy data showed that electron-dense ribbons surrounded by synaptic vesicles and synaptophysin and vGlut1 expression were present, confirming that there were synapses between retinal layers [62, 63]. These results show that our retinal organoids could develop some synaptic maturity at day 140. However, longer incubation periods of up to 200 days may be needed to enhance photoreceptor OS maturation [64].

For corneal organoids to form, the emergence of SE during the differentiation of hiPSCs into eye-field commitment was related to signals that regulate eye development [49, 65]. For instance, the transcription factor p63, especially its isoform ΔNp63α, has been linked to stemness and is highly expressed in the basal layers of the CE and in the limbus [66]. The presence of p63 + cells together with PAX6 in mzOPCs and organoids suggests they have a primitive epithelial surface [65] similar to those obtained from human limbal cells [15]. Inhibition of BMP4 during SEAM differentiation it has been shown that decreases the expression of p63 [65]; however, in contrast, the presence of noggin (inhibitor of BMP4) during the first 30 differentiation days in the current mzOPC cultures did not block p63 expression or the formation of surface ectoderm. Upon further differentiation, SE areas formed corneal-like organoids with a transparent epithelium that was filled with fluid and subsequently stroma and expressed proteins specific to the cornea, conjunctiva and limbus as previously described [38, 54]. Given the common developmental origin and a degree of structural similarity, both cornea and conjunctiva are transparent multilayer epithelia with some distinct features, such as cell layer thickness, type of cells, or the presence of mucins for the tear film [67], but it was not possible to distinguish corneal or conjunctival epithelia by eye. To further verify the maturation of the corneal organoids and distinguish between corneal and conjunctival epithelia, we confirmed the protein expression of CK3, AQP1 and N-Cad [47, 68]. We did observe a certain degree of stratification after 140 days, supporting the conclusion that these cells are able to mature toward terminally differentiated and stratifying corneal epithelial cells, which was more evident in multiocular organoids. Although we observed some corneal regions, organoids contained mostly limbal-conjunctival epithelium expressing CK5, CK19, Na+/K+-ATPase and p63, which have been previously established as putative markers [69]. Interestingly, conjunctival-predominant corneal organoids contained stratified columnar-type cells with interspersed goblet-like cells expressing mucin 1. Moreover, corneal organoids also contain mesenchymal cells in addition to ocular-specific cells [38, 54]. Mesenchymal cells might be derived from NC cells, rather than from mesoderm cells, and they appeared during differentiation. It is likely that NC-like cells come from cells that are proximal to the ectoderm, such as periocular NC, during eye development [5], which might be important for the development of organoids and epithelial growth. Indeed, VIM + keratocyte-like cells were found to produce stromal collagen types I and V, which are important for shaping corneal organoids, generating a subepithelial basement membrane-like structure that resembles the Bowman layer.

Previously, other studies generated RPE spheroids that differed from the RPE organoids obtained with this system [17, 70,71,72,73]. Compact RPE spheroids were obtained from ARPE19 or primary RPE cell aggregation that did not acquire apical-basolateral polarity or form Bruch’s membrane-line, collagen-filled or fluid-filled stroma, which did not recapitulate the native RPE epithelium. In contrast, our study and the study by Liu et al. [53] generated RPE organoids consist of an RPE monolayer on the surface, with microvilli on the apical side and deposits of collagen on the basolateral side, resembling Bruch’s membrane. RPE organoids acquired pigmentation over time and could be isolated and purified to obtain an RPE cell monolayer, which could be easily amplified and passaged; exhibiting a proper RPE phenotype and function, such as phagocytosis of the photoreceptor OS and production of VEGF and epithelium barrier [53]. This makes the RPE organoids useful for cell therapy either by single cell injections [41, 42] or by transplantation half of the RPE organoid, as they are already polarized and can be integrated in a similar manner as RPE in sheets or scaffolds [74], although it uses its own ECM as a support.

Organoids generated using our self-organization protocol displayed high complexity and contained different eye parts that are derived from the ectoderm germ layer. Although these tissues resemble those of the developing eye, whether ocular tissue can be guided to organize into its natural conformation to mimic the eye must still be determined. One limitation is that in this culture system, the organization of the different ocular tissues within the organoids was random and did not recreate the primitive eye conformation. This is probably due to the starting point of the differentiation in 2D and the technique to lift the ocular structures. But more important, the key limitation of this protocol is the lack of integrated vasculature or immune cells necessary to fully mimic adult ocular tissue composition [75]. The presence of these extra cell types in our multiocular organoids is not relevant to emulating early ocular development. Nevertheless, for later stages of development, these components are crucial, as multilineage communication is required for tissue development that contributes to tissue maturation [76, 77]. To solve this, several creative approaches are being developed to generate more advanced organoids [76,77,78,79]. Some strategies that have been recently utilized include the fusion of organoids that have grown apart, replacing the undefined Matrigel matrix with defined synthetic hydrogels and guided self-organization [80]. One further step to achieve even more complex and complete organoids is to incorporate blood vessels [81] and microglia [82] arising from the mesoderm. Indeed, vasculature or microglia (either by single-cell addition or by organoid assembly) has been already added to integrate within neural organoids while they formed [76, 77, 79, 82,83,84], which overcomes the aforementioned limitation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that by allowing multiocular structures from hiPSCs to self-organize, it is possible to obtain complex 3D multicellular ocular organoids that comprise the retina, cornea, RPE and stroma. A better understanding of eye development will likely be gained using multiple ocular cell cultures that closely mimic human early ocular tissue organization rather than single cell/tissue subtypes. This protocol not only avoids the problem of limited cell-type differentiation but also enables the simultaneous generation of RPE, retinal and corneal organoids. The hiPSC-derived organoids show remarkable similarity to the human retina, RPE and cornea, which we believe will pave the way for generating disease models and personalized medicine initiatives, such as drug screening platforms and/or gene and cell therapies. Blindness can be caused by many factors, from genetic defects and injuries of the anterior segment of the eye, such as corneal scars or infections, conjunctivitis, cataracts or keratitis, to posterior segment diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy or glaucoma. The different ocular organoids developed in this study display potential for use in developmental biology studies, disease modeling, drug testing and personalized medicine.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AQP1:

Aquaporin 1

AP-2:

Activating enhancer-binding protein 2-alpha

ATRA:

All-trans retinoic acid

bFGF:

Basic fibroblast growth factor

CD59:

Membrane attack complex inhibition factor

CD140:

Platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha

CE:

Corneal epithelium

CHX10:

VSX2: visual system homeobox 2

CK3:

Cytokeratin 3

CK5:

Cytokeratin 5

CK19:

Cytokeratin 19

CK12:

Cytokeratin 12

COL8A1:

Collagen Type VIII Alpha 1 Chain

COL8A2:

Collagen Type VIII Alpha 2 Chain

CRX:

Cone-rod homeobox

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindol

DIV:

Days in vitro

DKK-1:

Dickkopf-1

FITC:

Fluorescein isothiocyanate

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GCL:

Ganglion cell layer

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

hESC:

Human embryonic stem cells

hiPSC:

Human induced pluripotent stem cells

IGF-1:

Insulin growth factor 1

INL:

Inner nuclear layer

IS/OS:

Inner and outer segments

L:

Lens

mzOPC:

Multizone ocular progenitor cells

NC:

Neural crest

N-CAD:

N-cadherin

NE:

Neuroectoderm

NR:

Neuroretina

NRL:

Neural Retina Leucine Zipper

MITF:

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor

Na+/K+-ATPase:

Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase

NR2E3:

Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 3

OCT4:

Octamer-binding transcription factor 4

ONL:

Outer nuclear layer

OPL:

Outer plexiform layer

P63:

Delta-N tumor protein p63

P75-NGFR:

Nerve growth factor receptor

PAX3:

Paired box 3

PAX6:

Paired box 6

PE:

Pigmented epithelium

PKC-alpha:

Protein kinase C

POS:

Photoreceptor outer segment

qPCR:

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RAX:

Retinal homeobox protein Rx

RECOV:

Recoverin

RPE:

Retinal pigment epithelium

SD:

Standard deviation

SE:

Surface ectoderm

SEAM:

Self-formed ectodermal autonomous multizone

SIX6:

SIX homeobox 6

SOX2:

SRY-Box transcription factor 2

SOX9:

SRY-Box transcription factor 9

SOX10:

SRY-Box transcription factor 10

SSEA3:

Stage-specific embryonic antigen 3

SSEA4:

Stage-specific embryonic antigen 4

TEER:

Transepithelial electrical resistance

SYNAP:

Synaptophysin

Tra-1–60:

T cell receptor alpha locus

TFAP2A:

Transcription factor AP-2 alpha

TUJ1:

Beta-III tubulin

vGLUT1:

Vesicular glutamate transporter 1

ZO-1:

Zonula occludens

References

  1. 1.

    Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bassett EA, Wallace VA. Cell fate determination in the vertebrate retina. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(9):565–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lu Y, Yi W, Wu Q, Zhong S, Zuo Z, Zhao F, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis maps the development of human fetal retina. bioRxiv. 2018;423830.

  4. 4.

    Sparrow JR, Hicks D, Hamel CP. The retinal pigment epithelium in health and disease. Curr Mol Med. 2010;10(9):802–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lwigale PY. Corneal development: different cells from a common progenitor. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;134:43–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ebrahimi M, Taghi-Abadi E, Baharvand H. Limbal stem cells in review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2009;4(1):40–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Creuzet S, Vincent C, Couly G. Neural crest derivatives in ocular and periocular structures. Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(2–3):161–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stern JH, Tian Y, Funderburgh J, Pellegrini G, Zhang K, Goldberg JL, et al. Regenerating eye tissues to preserve and restore vision. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(6):834–49.

  11. 11.

    Manafi N, Shokri F, Achberger K, Hirayama M, Mohammadi MH, Noorizadeh F, et al. Organoids and organ chips in ophthalmology. Ocul Surf. 2021;19:1–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hofer M, Lutolf MP. Engineering organoids. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6(5):402–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shiju TM, Carlos de Oliveira R, Wilson SE. 3D in vitro corneal models: a review of current technologies. Exp Eye Res. 2020;200:108213.

  14. 14.

    Kim J, Koo B-K, Knoblich JA. Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(10):571–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Higa K, Higuchi J, Kimoto R, Miyashita H, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K, et al. Human corneal limbal organoids maintaining limbal stem cell niche function. Stem Cell Res. 2020;49:102012.

  16. 16.

    Eintracht J, Toms M, Moosajee M. The use of induced pluripotent stem cells as a model for developmental eye disorders. Front Cell Neurosci [Internet]. 2020 Aug 20 [cited 2020 Oct 5];14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468397/.

  17. 17.

    Zhu D, Xie M, Gademann F, Cao J, Wang P, Guo Y, et al. Protective effects of human iPS-derived retinal pigmented epithelial cells on retinal degenerative disease. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Llonch S, Carido M, Ader M. Organoid technology for retinal repair. Dev Biol. 2018;433(2):132–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ribeiro J, Procyk CA, West EL, O’Hara-Wright M, Martins MF, Khorasani MM, et al. Restoration of visual function in advanced disease after transplantation of purified human pluripotent stem cell-derived cone photoreceptors. Cell Rep. 2021;35(3):109022.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lin B, McLelland BT, Aramant RB, Thomas BB, Nistor G, Keirstead HS, et al. Retina organoid transplants develop photoreceptors and improve visual function in RCS rats with RPE dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(11):34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xian B, Luo Z, Li K, Li K, Tang M, Yang R, et al. Dexamethasone provides effective immunosuppression for improved survival of retinal organoids after epiretinal transplantation. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:7148032.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Singh RK, Occelli LM, Binette F, Petersen-Jones SM, Nasonkin IO. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal tissue in the subretinal space of the cat eye. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28(17):1151–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eastlake K, Wang W, Jayaram H, Murray-Dunning C, Carr AJF, Ramsden CM, et al. Phenotypic and functional characterization of Müller glia isolated from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal organoids: improvement of retinal ganglion cell function upon transplantation. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(8):775–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zou T, Gao L, Zeng Y, Li Q, Li Y, Chen S, et al. Organoid-derived C-Kit+/SSEA4- human retinal progenitor cells promote a protective retinal microenvironment during transplantation in rodents. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1205.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Collin J, Zerti D, Queen R, Santos-Ferreira T, Bauer R, Coxhead J, et al. CRX expression in pluripotent stem cell-derived photoreceptors marks a transplantable subpopulation of early cones. Stem Cells. 2019;37(5):609–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gagliardi G, Ben M’Barek K, Chaffiol A, Slembrouck-Brec A, Conart J-B, Nanteau C, et al. Characterization and transplantation of CD73-positive photoreceptors isolated from human iPSC-derived retinal organoids. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;11(3):665–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhu J, Reynolds J, Garcia T, Cifuentes H, Chew S, Zeng X, et al. Generation of transplantable retinal photoreceptors from a current good manufacturing practice-manufactured human induced pluripotent stem cell line. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7(2):210–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Santos-Ferreira T, Völkner M, Borsch O, Haas J, Cimalla P, Vasudevan P, et al. Stem cell-derived photoreceptor transplants differentially integrate into mouse models of cone-rod dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(7):3509–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hayashi R, Ishikawa Y, Sasamoto Y, Katori R, Nomura N, Ichikawa T, et al. Co-ordinated ocular development from human iPS cells and recovery of corneal function. Nature. 2016;531(7594):376–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fantes J, Ragge NK, Lynch S-A, McGill NI, Collin JRO, Howard-Peebles PN, et al. Mutations in SOX2 cause anophthalmia. Nat Genet. 2003;33(4):461–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Voronina VA, Kozhemyakina EA, O’Kernick CM, Kahn ND, Wenger SL, Linberg JV, et al. Mutations in the human RAX homeobox gene in a patient with anophthalmia and sclerocornea. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(3):315–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ferda Percin E, Ploder LA, Yu JJ, Arici K, Horsford DJ, Rutherford A, et al. Human microphthalmia associated with mutations in the retinal homeobox gene CHX10. Nat Genet. 2000;25(4):397–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Glaser T, Jepeal L, Edwards JG, Young SR, Favor J, Maas RL. PAX6 gene dosage effect in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects. Nat Genet. 1994;7(4):463–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Akula M, Park J, West-Mays J. The relationship between neural crest cell specification and rare ocular diseases. J Neurosci Res. 2019;97(1):7–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hayashi R, Ishikawa Y, Katori R, Sasamoto Y, Taniwaki Y, Takayanagi H, et al. Coordinated generation of multiple ocular-like cell lineages and fabrication of functional corneal epithelial cell sheets from human iPS cells. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(4):683–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Li Z, Duan H, Li W, Hu X, Jia Y, Zhao C, et al. Rapid differentiation of multi-zone ocular cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells and generation of corneal epithelial and endothelial Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28(7):454–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mellough CB, Collin J, Khazim M, White K, Sernagor E, Steel DHW, et al. IGF-1 signaling plays an important role in the formation of three-dimensional laminated neural retina and other ocular structures from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2015;33(8):2416–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Susaimanickam PJ, Maddileti S, Pulimamidi VK, Boyinpally SR, Naik RR, Naik MN, et al. Generating minicorneal organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Development. 2017;144(13):2338–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Giorgetti A, Montserrat N, Aasen T, Gonzalez F, Rodríguez-Pizà I, Vassena R, et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood using OCT4 and SOX2. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(4):353–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Maqueda M, Mosquera JL, García-Arumí J, Veiga A, Duarri A. Repopulation of decellularized retinas with hiPSC-derived retinal pigment epithelial and ocular progenitor cells shows cell engraftment, organization and differentiation. Biomaterials. 2021;121049.

  41. 41.

    Salas A, Duarri A, Fontrodona L, Ramírez DM, Badia A, Isla-Magrané H, et al. Cell therapy with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium and retinal precursor cells prevents visual function loss in a rat model of retinal degeneration. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev [Internet]. 2021 Feb 9 [cited 2021 Feb 10];0(0). https://www.cell.com/molecular-therapy-family/methods/abstract/S2329-0501(21)00021-8.

  42. 42.

    Riera M, Fontrodona L, Albert S, Ramirez DM, Seriola A, Salas A, et al. Comparative study of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) as a treatment for retinal dystrophies. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2016;3:16010.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Duarri A, Rodríguez-Bocanegra E, Martínez-Navarrete G, Biarnés M, García M, Ferraro LL, et al. Transplantation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in a swine model of geographic atrophy. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2021;22(19). https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/19/10497.

  44. 44.

    Badia A, Salas A, Duarri A, Ferreira-de-Souza B, Zapata MÁ, Fontrodona L, et al. Transcriptomics analysis of Ccl2/Cx3cr1/Crb1rd8 deficient mice provides new insights into the pathophysiology of progressive retinal degeneration. Exp Eye Res. 2021;203:108424.

  45. 45.

    Smith JR, Vallier L, Lupo G, Alexander M, Harris WA, Pedersen RA. Inhibition of Activin/Nodal signaling promotes specification of human embryonic stem cells into neuroectoderm. Dev Biol. 2008;313(1):107–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    LaVaute TM, Yoo YD, Pankratz MT, Weick JP, Gerstner JR, Zhang S-C. Regulation of neural specification from human embryonic stem cells by BMP and FGF. Stem Cells. 2009;27(8):1741–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wagoner MD, Bohrer LR, Aldrich BT, Greiner MA, Mullins RF, Worthington KS, et al. Feeder-free differentiation of cells exhibiting characteristics of corneal endothelium from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biol Open [Internet]. 2018 Apr 23 [cited 2021 Jan 8];7(5). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992532/.

  48. 48.

    Mellough CB, Bauer R, Collin J, Dorgau B, Zerti D, Dolan DWP, et al. An integrated transcriptional analysis of the developing human retina. Development. 2019;146(2).

  49. 49.

    Walker H, Akula M, West-Mays JA. Corneal development: role of the periocular mesenchyme and bi-directional signaling. Exp Eye Res. 2020;201:108231.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Nakamura T, Kelly JG, Trevisan J, Cooper LJ, Bentley AJ, Carmichael PL, et al. Microspectroscopy of spectral biomarkers associated with human corneal stem cells. Mol Vis. 2010;16:359–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kuwahara A, Ozone C, Nakano T, Saito K, Eiraku M, Sasai Y. Generation of a ciliary margin-like stem cell niche from self-organizing human retinal tissue. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kinoshita H, Suzuma K, Kaneko J, Mandai M, Kitaoka T, Takahashi M. Induction of functional 3D ciliary epithelium-like structure from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(1):153–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Liu S, Xie B, Song X, Zheng D, He L, Li G, et al. Self-formation of RPE spheroids facilitates enrichment and expansion of hiPSC-derived RPE generated on retinal organoid induction platform. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(13):5659–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Foster JW, Wahlin K, Adams SM, Birk DE, Zack DJ, Chakravarti S. Cornea organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41286.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Nomi K, Hayashi R, Ishikawa Y, Kobayashi Y, Katayama T, Quantock AJ, et al. Generation of functional conjunctival epithelium, including goblet cells, from human iPSCs. Cell Rep. 2021;34(5):108715.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Shibata S, Hayashi R, Okubo T, Kudo Y, Katayama T, Ishikawa Y, et al. Selective laminin-directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into distinct ocular lineages. Cell Rep. 2018;25(6):1668-1679.e5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Miesfeld JB, Brown NL. Eye organogenesis: a hierarchical view of ocular development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;132:351–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science. 2014;345(6194):1247125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zuber ME, Gestri G, Viczian AS, Barsacchi G, Harris WA. Specification of the vertebrate eye by a network of eye field transcription factors. Development. 2003;130(21):5155–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Quinn PMJ, Wijnholds J. Retinogenesis of the human fetal retina: an apical polarity perspective. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(12):987.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hoshino A, Ratnapriya R, Brooks MJ, Chaitankar V, Wilken MS, Zhang C, et al. Molecular anatomy of the developing human retina. Dev Cell. 2017;43(6):763–779.e4.

  62. 62.

    Wahlin KJ, Maruotti JA, Sripathi SR, Ball J, Angueyra JM, Kim C, et al. Photoreceptor outer segment-like structures in long-term 3D retinas from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):766.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Deng W-L, Gao M-L, Lei X-L, Lv J-N, Zhao H, He K-W, et al. Gene correction reverses ciliopathy and photoreceptor loss in iPSC-derived retinal organoids from retinitis pigmentosa patients. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10(4):1267–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Eldred KC, Hadyniak SE, Hussey KA, Brenerman B, Zhang P-W, Chamling X, et al. Thyroid hormone signaling specifies cone subtypes in human retinal organoids. Science. 2018;362(6411):eaau6348.

  65. 65.

    Kobayashi Y, Hayashi R, Shibata S, Quantock AJ, Nishida K. Ocular surface ectoderm instigated by WNT inhibition and BMP4. Stem Cell Res. 2020;46:101868.

  66. 66.

    Chen Z, de Paiva CS, Luo L, Kretzer FL, Pflugfelder SC, Li D-Q. Characterization of putative stem cell phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Stem Cells. 2004;22(3):355–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ramos T, Scott D, Ahmad S. An update on ocular surface epithelial stem cells: cornea and conjunctiva. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:e601731.

  68. 68.

    Merjava S, Neuwirth A, Tanzerova M, Jirsova K. The spectrum of cytokeratins expressed in the adult human cornea, limbus and perilimbal conjunctiva. Histol Histopathol. 2011;26(3):323–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Turner HC, Budak MT, Murat Akinci MA, Wolosin JM. Comparative Analysis of human conjunctival and corneal epithelial gene expression with oligonucleotide microarrays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(5):2050–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Usui H, Nishiwaki A, Landiev L, Kacza J, Eichler W, Wako R, et al. In vitro drusen model—three-dimensional spheroid culture of retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 2018;132(4):jcs215798.

  71. 71.

    Saadat KASM, Murakami Y, Tan X, Nomura Y, Yasukawa T, Okada E, et al. Inhibition of autophagy induces retinal pigment epithelial cell damage by the lipofuscin fluorophore A2E. FEBS Open Bio. 2014;4:1007–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Sato R, Yasukawa T, Kacza J, Eichler W, Nishiwaki A, Iandiev I, et al. Three-dimensional spheroidal culture visualization of membranogenesis of Bruch’s membrane and basolateral functions of the retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):1740–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kosheleva NV, Efremov YM, Shavkuta BS, Zurina IM, Zhang D, Zhang Y, et al. Cell spheroid fusion: beyond liquid drops model. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12614.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Koss MJ, Falabella P, Stefanini FR, Pfister M, Thomas BB, Kashani AH, et al. Subretinal implantation of a monolayer of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium: a feasibility and safety study in Yucatán minipigs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(8):1553–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Fathi M, Ross CT, Hosseinzadeh Z. Functional 3-dimensional retinal organoids: technological progress and existing challenges. Front Neurosci [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 16];15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.668857/full.

  76. 76.

    Wörsdörfer P, Dalda N, Kern A, Krüger S, Wagner N, Kwok CK, et al. Generation of complex human organoid models including vascular networks by incorporation of mesodermal progenitor cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15663.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Wörsdörfer P, TakashiI I, Asahina I, Sumita Y, Ergün S. Do not keep it simple: recent advances in the generation of complex organoids. J Neural Transm. 2020;127(11):1569–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Caffrey TM, Button EB, Robert J. Toward three-dimensional in vitro models to study neurovascular unit functions in health and disease. Neural Regen Res. 2021;16(11):2132–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Chichagova V, Georgiou M, Dorgau B, Carter M, Chung G, Sernagor E, et al. Enhancing immune function of hiPSC-derived retinal organoids by incorporating microglial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(7):3797–3797.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    de Souza N. Organoids. Nat Methods. 2018;15(1):23–23.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yu J. Vascularized organoids: a more complete model. Int J Stem Cells. 2021;14(2):127–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ormel PR, Vieira de Sá R, van Bodegraven EJ, Karst H, Harschnitz O, Sneeboer MAM, et al. Microglia innately develop within cerebral organoids. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4167.

  83. 83.

    Matsui TK, Tsuru Y, Hasegawa K, Kuwako K. Vascularization of human brain organoids. STEM CELLS [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jul 26];n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3368.

  84. 84.

    Song L, Yuan X, Jones Z, Vied C, Miao Y, Marzano M, et al. Functionalization of brain region-specific spheroids with isogenic microglia-like cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11055.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Histological processing was performed by the ICTS-NANBIOSIS-U20/FVPR at the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research.

Funding

This research project was funded by a grant from La Marató de TV3 Foundation (484/C/2012) and ERA-NET EuroNanoMed III/ISCIII (AC19/00080) (CELLUX). We thank CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support (SGR 2017–2019). A.D. was supported by PRB2-ISCIII (PT13/0001/0041) and ISCIII-FEDER RETICS (Oftared; RD16/0008). H.IM. was supported by EuroNanoMed III-ISCIII (AC19/00080).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HIM conducted the experiments, collected and assembled data, performed data analysis and interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. AV and JGA approved the final manuscript and provided financial support. AD designed and executed the experiments, collected and assembled data, performed analysis and interpretation, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Duarri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Human iPSC lines were obtained from the Spanish National Stem Cell Bank after approval by the Ethics Review Board and the Catalan Authority for Stem Cells.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. “Supplementary Information” containing figures for the characterization of mzOPC and multiocular organoids: CB30 line (Figures S1, S4, S5, S7-S9) and FiPS line (Figures S2, S3, S6), tables for antibodies and primers (Tables S1 and S2) along with information for the characterization of hiPSC lines, TEER and POS Phagocytosis Assays with the corresponding references.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isla-Magrané, H., Veiga, A., García-Arumí, J. et al. Multiocular organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells displayed retinal, corneal, and retinal pigment epithelium lineages. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02651-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Stem cells
  • Ocular precursor cells
  • Ocular organoids
  • Retina
  • Cornea
  • RPE
  • Retinal pigment epithelium