Bmi1 + cardiac progenitor cells contribute to myocardial repair following acute injury
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 12 May 2016
Accepted: 28 June 2016
Published: 30 July 2016
The inability of the adult mammalian heart to replace cells lost after severe cardiac injury compromises organ function. Although the heart is one of the least regenerative organs in the body, evidence accumulated in recent decades indicates a certain degree of renewal after injury. We have evaluated the role of cardiac Bmi1 + progenitor cells (Bmi1-CPC) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Bmi1 Cre/+;Rosa26 YFP/+ (Bmi1-YFP) mice were used for lineage tracing strategy. After tamoxifen (TM) induction, yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) is expressed under the control of Rosa26 regulatory sequences in Bmi1 + cells. YFP+ cells were tracked following myocardial infarction. Additionally, whole transcriptome analysis of isolated YFP+ cells was performed in unchallenged hearts and after myocardial infarction.
Deep-sequencing analysis of Bmi1-CPC from unchallenged hearts suggests that this population expresses high levels of pluripotency markers. Conversely, transcriptome evaluation of Bmi1-CPC following AMI shows a rich representation of genes related to cell proliferation, movement, and cell cycle. Lineage-tracing studies after cardiac infarction show that the progeny of Bmi1-expressing cells contribute to de novo cardiomyocytes (CM) (13.8 ± 5 % new YFP+ CM compared to 4.7 ± 0.9 % in age-paired non-infarcted hearts). However, apical resection of TM-induced day 1 Bmi1-YFP pups indicated a very minor contribution of Bmi1-derived cells to de novo CM.
Cardiac Bmi1 progenitor cells respond to cardiac injury, contributing to the generation of de novo CM in the adult mouse heart.
KeywordsMyocardial infarction Stem cells Bmi1 Cardiac progenitor cells
Myocardial infarction leads to an irreversible loss of cardiac myocytes, which compromises cardiac function. Although adult mammals are believed to have a very limited capacity to replace cardiomyocytes (CM), the traditional view of a terminally differentiated organ has recently been challenged by evidence of low intrinsic CM turnover in the adult mouse  and human hearts . Estimated rates of CM turnover nonetheless vary greatly , and the underlying mechanisms [1, 4] and the origin of new cells contributing to adult cardiomyocyte turnover after injury remain unclear . The main concepts to explain heart turnover are based on proliferation of CM [6–8] or the potential of cardiac progenitor cells (CPC) that are defined primarily by surface markers such as c-KIT  or SCA-1 (also known as Ly6a) [10, 11]. The diversity of findings for these populations and the absence of specific, definite markers to identify CPC have given rise to notable controversy.
Bmi1, a member of the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), has a central role during self-renewal and maintenance of several adult stem cell compartments [12–14]. High Bmi1 expression defines a population of adult resident cardiac progenitor cells (Bmi1-CPC) that are able to generate de novo CM during homeostasis in the adult heart . Here we show that Bmi1-CPC have a stemness genetic profile, are activated, and contribute to de novo CM after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Bmi1IRESCreER mice and tamoxifen administration
Males and female double heterozygous Bmi1 CreER/+;Rosa26 YFP/+ (Bmi1-YFP) mice, generated by crossing the Bmi1 CreER/+ strain with Rosa26 YFP/+ reporter mice, received intraperitoneal (i.p.) tamoxifen (TM) injections (Sigma) between postnatal days 30 (P30) and P60. For neonatal studies, pregnant Bmi1 CreER/CreER x Rosa26 YFP/YFP mothers were TM-induced at 17.5 and 18.5 days postcoitum. TM was dissolved in corn oil (Sigma; final concentration 20 mg/ml), and mice received TM every 24 h on three consecutive days (9 mg/40 g body weight; each day). The ethics committees of the Spanish Cardiovascular Research Center (CNIC) and the Spanish National Center for Biotechnology (CNB) approved the animal studies.
Heart immunohistochemistry was performed as described . Specific yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) detection with anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) antibody was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis of two control conditions (heart sections from TM-injected Rosa26 YFP/+ and non-injected Bmi1-YFP mice (Bmi1-YFPNI)); no signal was observed in either . For immunodetection, sections were fixed in 2 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) and rinsed in PHEM buffer (25 mM Hepes, 10 mM EGTA, 60 mM PIPES, 2 mM MgCl2; all from Sigma). Slides were rinsed in blocking buffer (0.5 % porcine skin gelatin, 0.1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA); Sigma) and incubated in 150 mM glycine (Merck; 10 min at room temperature (RT)), then with sodium borohydride (Sigma; 10 min), and finally in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1 % Triton X-100 (Sigma). Preparations were incubated with primary antibody (see Additional file 1: Table S1) for 1 h at RT, washed, and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (1 h). Slides were incubated with Sytox Green and mounted in ProLong antifade reagent (both from Invitrogen). Images were captured with a Leica SP5, Zeiss LSM 700, or LSM 780 coupled to a two-photon Spectra-Physics Mai.Tai laser scanning confocal microscope, and were assembled with ImageJ (NIH). Processing, which included pseudo-color assignment and brightness changes, was applied uniformly across the entire image and used exclusively to equalize the appearance of multiple panels in a single figure.
Cell isolation and flow cytometry
Bmi1-YFP hearts were perfused with PBS to remove blood cells and processed by digestion with 0.1 % collagenase IV (Sigma) and 10 μg/ml DNAse (Roche) (40 min, 37 °C). The resulting single cell suspension was passed through a 40-μm filter to remove debris. YFP+ cells were separated from the total heart mass on a BD FacsAria II cell sorter fitted with a 488 nm laser to excite YFP (collected in the 525/50 channel). To discriminate YFP+ from autoflorescent cells, a 488 nm laser was used to excite cells, followed by collection in the 585 channel (phycoerythrin). These peak emission wavelengths are far enough apart so that each signal can be detected by a separate detector.
For the Sca-1 population, the CD45+ fraction was removed by discarding CD45+ cells using 405-conjugated rat anti-CD45 (1:100) and selecting for SCA-1 with APC-rat anti-SCA-1/Ly6a (1:100; both from BD Pharmingen). Data were analyzed using Facs DIVA Software.
Isolation of adult mouse cardiomyocytes
Adult mouse CM were isolated from failing hearts of TM-induced adult Bmi1-YFP mice. The heart was rapidly removed and retrograde perfused under constant pressure (60 mmHg; 37 °C, 8 min) in Ca2+-free buffer (113 M NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 5.5 mM glucose, 0.6 mM KH2PO4, 0.6 mM Na2HPO4, 12 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM KHCO3, 10 mM Hepes, 10 mM 2,3-butanedione monoxime, 30 mM taurine). Digestion was initiated by adding Liberase Blendzyme recombinant enzyme mix (0.2 mg/ml; Roche), trypsin (0.14 mg/ml; Invitrogen), and CaCl2 (12.5 μM) to the perfusion solution. When the heart became swollen and soft (10 min digestion) it was removed and gently teased into small pieces with fine forceps in the same enzyme solution. Heart tissue was further dissociated using a graded series of plastic transfer pipettes (2-, 1.5-, and 1-mm diameters openings) until all large pieces of heart tissue were dispersed in a cell suspension. Digestion buffer was neutralized with stopping buffer (10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 12.5 μM CaCl2). CM were pelleted by gravity (20 min), the supernatant aspirated, and CM resuspended in perfusion solution with 5 % FBS and 12.5 μM CaCl2. The calcium content was increased by gradual CaCl2 addition (62 μM to 1 mM). CM were pelleted by gravity (15–20 min) and, in culture dishes pre-coated with 0.5 g/ml mouse laminin (BD Biosciences) in PBS (1–2 h, RT), CM were plated in plating medium (Medium 199 Hank’s (Invitrogen), 0.25 % BSA (Sigma), 22 mM NaHCO3, 0.05 % FBS (Sigma), 0.001 % ITS Supplement (Gibco), 10 mM 2,3-butanedione monoxime, 25 μM blebbistatin (Sigma)) (2 h); CM were fixed with 2 % PFA and used for immunocytochemistry. In Fig. 4d and e, CM were plated, fixed and stained for SαA, GFP, and DAPI. The number of YFP+ CM and nuclei were assessed on duplicated microscope cover glasses (12 mm. diameter). At least 200 CM per cover glass were counted.
In vivo proliferation analysis
EdU (5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine; Sigma) was dissolved in 0.9 % NaCl solution and stored at 10 mg/ml. For proliferation experiments, mice received EdU (10 μg/g, i.p., once daily, 14 consecutive days). For the homeostatic group the pulse started on day 6 post-TM induction, and for the AMI group the pulse was given the day after AMI (day 6 post-TM induction).
After heart digestion (see above) YFP+ cells were sorted. For EdU staining, the Click-iT Plus EdU Alexa Fluor 647 Flow Cytometry reaction (Life Technologies) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry with propidium iodide.
RNA isolation and RNAseq analysis
RNA was extracted from hearts of 8-week-old TM-induced Bmi1-YFP mice. In the homeostatic study at 5 days post-TM induction RNA was extracted from 4 × 105 sorted Bmi1-CPC (YFP+) and Sca-1-YFP– cells from four replicates each (6 mice/replicate). Under injury conditions AMI was performed 5 days post-TM induction, and 5 days post-AMI RNA was extracted from 4 × 105 sorted Bmi1-CPC (YFP+) cells from four replicates (2–3 mice/replicate).
Total RNA was isolated with the Arcturus PicoPure kit (Applied Biosystems). cDNA was amplified from total RNA (10–25 ng) using the Ovation RNA-seq System v2 (NuGEN Technologies). Amplified cDNA (1 μg) was sonicated to an average size of 200–300 bp and used with the TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation v2 Kit (Illumina) to generate index-tagged sequencing libraries. Library quality and size distribution were determined with the Agilent Bioanalyzer DNA-1000 Kit (Agilent Technologies) and quantified with the Nanoquant spectrophotometer (Tecan). Libraries were applied to an Illumina flow cell for cluster generation (True Seq SR Cluster Kit V2 cBot). Single reads of 75 bases were generated on the Genome Analyzer IIx using the TruSeq SBS Kit v5 (Illumina) following standard sequencing protocol. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software was used to integrate RNAseq analysis data to define plausible signaling cascades by autogenerating regulatory networks. Gene Ontology (GO) heat maps included significant term analysis (adjusted P value <0.05) of genes differentially expressed in Bmi1-CPC versus Sca-1-YFP– cardiac compartments. GO analysis of significantly over- and under-represented terms was conducted with FatiGO (www.babelomics.org). Heat maps in Fig. 3d were obtained with Genesis software.
Histology (hematoxylin/eosin staining)
Neonatal hearts from Bmi1-YFP mice at 1, 7, and 21 days post-resection (dpr) were rinsed with PBS, embedded directly in OCT (Tissue Tek), and stored at –80 °C. Cryosections (8 μm) were hematoxylin/eosin-stained following standard procedures.
Cardiac injury models in neonatal and adult mice
The left ventricular apex was resected in neonatal hearts from P1 Bmi1-YFP mice. Neonates were anesthetized by cooling on an ice bed (4 min). Lateral thoracotomy at the fourth intercostal space was performed by blunt dissection of the intercostal muscles following skin incision. To separate the ribs we used 1-mm wide retractors (FST) to expose the heart. Iridectomy scissors were used to resect the P1 heart apex to expose the left ventricular chamber. Thoracic wall incisions were sutured with 7-0 non-absorbable silk suture, and the skin wound closed using skin adhesive (Vetbond, 3M). Sham-operated mice underwent the same procedure without apical resection. Neonates were then placed under a heat lamp and warmed for several minutes until recovery.
For AMI in adult hearts, mice were anesthetized with 4 % sevoflurane, intubated, and ventilated with a 50 % air:oxygen mixture using a positive-pressure respirator (Minivent 845, Harvard; 160 strokes/min, 250 μl tidal volume). A left thoracotomy was performed via the fourth intercostal space and the lungs retracted to expose the heart. After opening the pericardium, the left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated with 7-0 silk suture approximately 2 mm below the edge of the left atrial appendage. Ligation was considered successful when the anterior wall of the left ventricle turned pale. The lungs were inflated by increasing positive end-expiratory pressure and the thoracotomy site closed in layers with 6-0 suture. Animals were maintained on a 37 °C heating pad until recovery and for 2 h after surgery. Another group of mice underwent sham ligation, with a similar surgical procedure without tightening the suture around the coronary artery.
Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5.0. Significance between groups was evaluated in all experiments as detailed for each figure. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. All replicates considered are biological replicates. P values were calculated by unpaired Student’s t test with Welch’s correction. Data are shown as mean ± SEM.
Transcriptome study of Bmi1-CPC isolated from unchallenged hearts shows enrichment in stemness-related genes
We previously reported that non-myocyte Bmi1-CPC contribute to homeostatic cardiomyocyte turnover in the adult murine heart . Following TM induction of healthy Bmi1 CreER/+;Rosa26 YFP/+ mice (Bmi1-YFP), flow cytometry of non-cardiomyocyte heart cells identified a YFP-expressing population (2.7 ± 0.2 % cells/heart) 5 days post-TM induction that represents a small subset (5.4 ± 0.4 %) of the SCA-1+ cardiac population . Additionally, lineage tracing of Bmi1 +-derived progeny up to 1 year after TM induction showed YFP+ CM (6.7 ± 1.3 %) in vivo.
Bmi1-CPC are activated in response to acute myocardial infarction
Cardiac injury induces an activated phenotype in Bmi1-CPC
These results suggest a proliferative activation of Bmi1-derived cells shortly after AMI, and the upregulation of crucial cell functions that are required to respond after tissue injury and instigate repair.
Bmi1-CPC contribute to cardiac repair with de novo cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction in adult mice but not after neonatal apical heart resection
Additionally, the relevant regenerative capacity that the mouse neonatal heart exhibits during the first week of life has been recently reported [16, 17]. Therefore, we next explored the potential role of Bmi1-CPC in these early cardiac stages (Fig. 4f). We treated pregnant mice (Bmi1 CreER/CreER or Rosa26 YFP/YFP females) with TM (E17.5, E18.5); flow cytometry confirmed YFP expression in neonatal heart cells (double heterozygotes) at postnatal day 1 (P1) (Fig. 4g). Bmi1-YFP pups that underwent apex resection at P1 were sacrificed at P21, when the apex was fully restored (Fig. 4h). YFP+ cells were detected in the atrium and ventricle, but very rarely or not at all in the regenerated area (Fig. 4i); this indicates that Bmi1-derived cells make no major contribution to immediate postnatal regeneration.
Our study provides evidence that Bmi1-derived cells contribute to de novo generation of CM after myocardial infarction, which is greater than for heart homeostasis with ageing. These findings consolidate Bmi1-CPC cells as a sound source of progenitors for cardiac repair.
The cardiac stem field was initiated by the isolation and characterization of c-KIT + CPC , which recently were proposed necessary and sufficient for heart repair after injury . c-kit expression in vitro and in vivo has yielded disparate results, however, which probably reflects the extremely variable expression of this marker in distinct contexts and conditions [19, 20]. Three recent independent lineage-tracing studies found that c-kit + cardiac progenitor cells produce <0.008 % of the new CM in adult mouse heart, and proposed that c-kit + cells are not relevant either for homeostasis or after myocardial infarction [21–23]. Our own research on Bmi1-CPC showed that these progenitors are mainly negative for c-KIT expression (0.1–1 %) , suggesting that the majority of de novo CM derive from Bmi1 + c-kit – progeny.
Putative CPC have also been isolated based on their expression of the established hematopoietic marker SCA-1 , although SCA-1 appears to label a heterogeneous population with predominantly endothelial potential [25, 26]. Genetic elimination of Sca-1 affects resident CPC, which then fail to respond to pathological damage in vivo; this coincided with impaired in vitro growth and survival of these cardiac progenitor cells . SCA-1 CPC contributes to CM generation in a model of pressure overload cardiac injury (transverse aortic constriction), but not after AMI . Our Bmi1-CPC showed a strong response after AMI and the percentage of de novo CM generated is greater than that observed during normal cardiac homeostasis. Although Uchida et al.  found no major contribution by the Sca-1 + population in new CM formation after acute injury, the distinct methods and transgenic models used in these studies could explain the differences. The authors nonetheless suggested that only a small fraction of the Sca-1 + population contributes to the CM lineage . Bmi1-CPC make up a fraction of the Sca-1 + population , and our results here suggest that Bmi1 + cells are the Sca-1 + subset involved in this new CM generation. The information gleaned from the deep-sequencing analysis of Bmi1-CPC from healthy hearts reinforces the idea that this population expresses higher levels of pluripotency markers. We consider Bmi1 to be a key transcription factor that controls stemness in the adult heart, thus defining a population of cardiac progenitors. This would be in agreement with the critical positive role of Bmi1 in fibroblast reprogramming to embryonic stem cells [28, 29] and the very recent description as a key epigenetic barrier to direct cardiac reprogramming .
The limited capacity of the adult mammalian heart to recover after myocardial injury is well established. A genetic fate-mapping strategy gave indirect evidence that up to 19 % of CM are replaced 3 months post-AMI, but the source of the new CM was not definitively determined . Our lineage-tracing studies after cardiac infarction show that Bmi1-expressing cells contribute to significant and comparable numbers of de novo CM. This result provides direct evidence of a resident cardiac progenitor population that contributes to heart repair. RNAseq analysis of Bmi1-CPC isolated 5 days after AMI showed an increase in genes related to cell proliferation, movement, and cell cycle functions, all of which are necessary for cells to reach the infarcted area and to instigate repair. Bmi1-derived cells also showed marked upregulation of extracellular matrix proteins, growth factors, and pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The data from the RNAseq study indicate that, following cardiac injury, Bmi1-CPC sense the unfavorable environment originated by the insult and respond by upregulating pathways related to key cell functions required to promote repair. Although we did not detect a defined pattern of cardiomyocyte specification markers in the Bmi1-derived cells 5 days after injury, surviving Bmi1-CPC at this early stage might need to proliferate and migrate before they can respond appropriately to injury-induced signals. Lineage tracing of Bmi1 + cells at 4 months post-AMI showed generation of 13.8 ± 5 % new YFP+ CM, which coincides with some previous reports  and pinpointed the Bmi1-CPC ability to contribute to myocardial repair after injury. Immunostaining of a panel of contractility-related proteins showed that these YFP+ CM were indistinguishable from YFP– CM. Although we did not detect YFP+ CM within the injured area, these new CM might have an important role in supporting basal heart beat and cardiac function after AMI. In any case, the role of Bmi1 +-CPC in cardiac repair after AMI is compatible with contributions from other reported sources [24, 32]. Further characterization of the mechanisms that lead to endogenous progenitor cell activation and of the mechanisms that permit repopulation of the infarcted region could be a new opportunity for therapeutic applications.
Although the adult mammalian heart is one of the least regenerative organs in the body, different studies have described heart regeneration in lower vertebrates and neonatal mammals following apical resection [33, 34]. Lineage tracing experiments in adult zebrafish following cardiac injury suggest that the vast majority of the regenerated CM are derived from pre-existing proliferative CM rather than from a population of cardiac stem/progenitor cells [34, 35]. Additionally, the neonatal mouse heart has shown a similar ability to restore the lost myocardial tissue within the first week of postnatal life [17, 36, 37], primarily, by proliferation of pre-existing cardiomyocytes and not by putative population(s) of endogenous CPC [38, 39]. However, the ability to efficiently regenerate the heart muscle upon injury is essentially lost by postnatal day 7, coinciding with the developmental window when mouse CM mostly binucleate and withdraw from the cell cycle . This compromised ability to fully repair the damaged/resected myocardium is mainly related to the lack of basal proliferation in adult CM. However, there are several reports pinpointing the relevant role of endogenous CPC leading to the reparative response in the adult mouse following cardiac injury [24, 31, 32, 41]. Although adult CPC do not fully restore a severe acutely damaged tissue, their contribution to de novo CM may contribute to maintain organ functionality. Altogether these reports, and our own data (apical resection of TM-induced day 1 Bmi1-YFP pups indicate a minor contribution of Bmi1-derived cells to de novo CM), may suggest a switch in CPC reparative role through the lifespan of the organism.
Therefore, further studies will determine and evaluate the mechanisms by which Bmi1 + cells remain less active in neonatal heart regeneration but play a more direct role in adult heart repair. Moreover, it will also be necessary to understand the hypothetic crosstalk existing between CM and Bmi1 + through the lifespan of the animal to clarify the different reparative responses that Bmi1 + exhibit following cardiac injury in the neonatal and adult heart.
Our results show that Bmi1 expression defines a multipotent cardiac cell population with capacity for myocardial repair following cardiac injury in adult mice. Future research to better characterize the biology of Bmi1-CPC will help to identify critical factors that allow their potential to be harnessed for effective cardiac cell therapy.
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; Bmi1, B cell-specific Moloney murine leukemia virus integration site 1; BSA, bovine serum albumin; EdU, 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine; c-KIT, Kit oncogene; CM, cardiomyocytes; Cre-ER, variant of the site-specific (loxP) recombinase Cre that binds to the estrogen receptor module (ER); CPC, cardiac progenitor cells; FACS, fluorescence-activated sorting; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GO, gene ontology; i.p., intraperitoneal; IPA, ingenuity Pathway Analysis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PFA, paraformaldehyde; RNAseq, RNA sequencing; Rosa26, mouse locus used for constitutive, ubiquitous gene expression; RT, room temperature; SαA, sarcomeric α-actinin; SCA-1, stem cell antigen-1; TM, tamoxifen; YFP, yellow fluorescent protein
We thank E. Arza and A.M. Santos for assistance with confocal microscopy and dynamic imaging, R.M. Carmona for help with the animal colony management, F.S. Cabo for bioinformatics and statistical support, J.M Ligos for the sorting strategy, and C. Mark for editorial support. The CNB-CSIC and CNIC are supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
This study was supported by grants to AB from the Ministry of Science and Innovation (SAF2012-34327 and SAF2015-70882-R), the Research Program of the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (S2010/BMD-2420), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RETICS-RD12/0019/0018), and the European Commission (Proposal 242038).
Availability of data and materials
The GEO accession number for both homeostasis and AMI transciptome data reported in this paper is GEO: GSE55754.
IVA conceived the experiments, developed the project, contributed ideas, and wrote the manuscript. CAC conceived, designed and performed experiments, developed the project, contributed ideas, and revised the manuscript. DH designed and performed experiments and revised the manuscript. IS contributed with mice cardiac surgery procedures and revised the manuscript. AB conceived and developed the project, designed experiments, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The ethics committees of the Spanish Cardiovascular Research Center (CNIC) and the Spanish National Center for Biotechnology (CNB) approved the animal studies.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Laflamme MA, Murry CE. Heart regeneration. Nature. 2011;473:326–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bergmann O, Bhardwaj RD, Bernard S, Zdunek S, Barnabe-Heider F, Walsh S, et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science. 2009;324:98–102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kajstura J, Urbanek K, Perl S, Hosoda T, Zheng H, Ogorek B, et al. Cardiomyogenesis in the adult human heart. Circ Res. 2010;107:305–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Steinhauser ML, Lee RT. Regeneration of the heart. EMBO Mol Med. 2011;3:701–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van Berlo JH, Molkentin JD. An emerging consensus on cardiac regeneration. Nat Med. 2014;20:1386–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Malliaras K, Zhang Y, Seinfeld J, Galang G, Tseliou E, Cheng K, et al. Cardiomyocyte proliferation and progenitor cell recruitment underlie therapeutic regeneration after myocardial infarction in the adult mouse heart. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:191–209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Senyo SE, Steinhauser ML, Pizzimenti CL, Yang VK, Cai L, Wang M, et al. Mammalian heart renewal by pre-existing cardiomyocytes. Nature. 2013;493:433–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Zhong JF, Qiu H, Robb MacLellan W, Marban E, Wang C. Epigenomic reprogramming of adult cardiomyocyte-derived cardiac progenitor cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17686.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114:763–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galvez BG, Sampaolesi M, Barbuti A, Crespi A, Covarello D, Brunelli S, et al. Cardiac mesoangioblasts are committed, self-renewable progenitors, associated with small vessels of juvenile mouse ventricle. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1417–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh H, Bradfute SB, Gallardo TD, Nakamura T, Gaussin V, Mishina Y, et al. Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12313–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Molofsky AV, Pardal R, Iwashita T, Park IK, Clarke MF, Morrison SJ. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature. 2003;425:962–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Park IK, Qian D, Kiel M, Becker MW, Pihalja M, Weissman IL, et al. Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2003;423:302–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sangiorgi E, Capecchi MR. Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nat Genet. 2008;40:915–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Valiente-Alandi I, Albo-Castellanos C, Herrero D, Arza E, Garcia-Gomez M, Segovia JC, et al. Cardiac Bmi1(+) cells contribute to myocardial renewal in the murine adult heart. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:205.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jesty SA, Steffey MA, Lee FK, Breitbach M, Hesse M, Reining S, et al. c-kit+ precursors support postinfarction myogenesis in the neonatal, but not adult, heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13380–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science. 2011;331:1078–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ellison GM, Vicinanza C, Smith AJ, Aquila I, Leone A, Waring CD, et al. Adult c-kit(pos) cardiac stem cells are necessary and sufficient for functional cardiac regeneration and repair. Cell. 2013;154:827–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tallini YN, Greene KS, Craven M, Spealman A, Breitbach M, Smith J, et al. c-kit expression identifies cardiovascular precursors in the neonatal heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1808–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zaruba MM, Soonpaa M, Reuter S, Field LJ. Cardiomyogenic potential of C-kit(+)-expressing cells derived from neonatal and adult mouse hearts. Circulation. 2010;121:1992–2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu Q, Yang R, Huang X, Zhang H, He L, Zhang L, et al. Genetic lineage tracing identifies in situ Kit-expressing cardiomyocytes. Cell Res. 2016;26:119–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Berlo JH, Kanisicak O, Maillet M, Vagnozzi RJ, Karch J, Lin SC, et al. c-kit + cells minimally contribute cardiomyocytes to the heart. Nature. 2014;509:337–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sultana N, Zhang L, Yan J, Chen J, Cai W, Razzaque S, et al. Resident c-kit(+) cells in the heart are not cardiac stem cells. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8701.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Uchida S, De Gaspari P, Kostin S, Jenniches K, Kilic A, Izumiya Y, et al. Sca1-derived cells are a source of myocardial renewal in the murine adult heart. Stem Cell Rep. 2013;1:397–410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoch M, Fischer P, Stapel B, Missol-Kolka E, Sekkali B, Scherr M, et al. Erythropoietin preserves the endothelial differentiation capacity of cardiac progenitor cells and reduces heart failure during anticancer therapies. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:131–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang SX, Khachigian LM, Ahmadi Z, Yang M, Liu S, Chong BH. In vitro and in vivo proliferation, differentiation and migration of cardiac endothelial progenitor cells (SCA1+/CD31+ side-population cells). J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:1628–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bailey B, Fransioli J, Gude NA, Alvarez Jr R, Zhang X, Gustafsson AB, et al. Sca-1 knockout impairs myocardial and cardiac progenitor cell function. Circ Res. 2012;111:750–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moon JH, Heo JS, Kim JS, Jun EK, Lee JH, Kim A, et al. Reprogramming fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with Bmi1. Cell Res. 2011;21:1305–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Onder TT, Kara N, Cherry A, Sinha AU, Zhu N, Bernt KM, et al. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature. 2012;483:598–602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Y, Wang L, Vaseghi HR, Liu Z, Lu R, Alimohamadi S, et al. Bmi1 is a key epigenetic barrier to direct cardiac reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:382–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh PC, Segers VF, Davis ME, MacGillivray C, Gannon J, Molkentin JD, et al. Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. Nat Med. 2007;13:970–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Malliaras K, Ibrahim A, Tseliou E, Liu W, Sun B, Middleton RC, et al. Stimulation of endogenous cardioblasts by exogenous cell therapy after myocardial infarction. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6:760–77.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Oberpriller JO, Oberpriller JC. Response of the adult newt ventricle to injury. J Exp Zool. 1974;187:249–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, Izpisua Belmonte JC. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature. 2010;464:606–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Werdich AA, Anderson RM, Fang Y, Egnaczyk GF, et al. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. Nature. 2010;464:601–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Johnson BA, Grinsfelder D, Canseco D, et al. Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:187–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Konfino T, Landa N, Ben-Mordechai T, Leor J. The type of injury dictates the mode of repair in neonatal and adult heart. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e001320.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aurora AB, Porrello ER, Tan W, Mahmoud AI, Hill JA, Bassel-Duby R, et al. Macrophages are required for neonatal heart regeneration. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:1382–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sen S, Sadek HA. Neonatal heart regeneration: mounting support and need for technical standards. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e001727.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Soonpaa MH, Kim KK, Pajak L, Franklin M, Field LJ. Cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis and binucleation during murine development. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H2183–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fioret BA, Heimfeld JD, Paik DT, Hatzopoulos AK. Endothelial cells contribute to generation of adult ventricular myocytes during cardiac homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2014;8:229–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar