Skip to main content

Priming approaches to improve the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies

  • The Correction to this article has been published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy 2019 10:132


Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have been widely explored for cell-based therapy of immune-mediated, inflammatory, and degenerative diseases, due to their immunosuppressive, immunomodulatory, and regenerative potentials. Preclinical studies and clinical trials have demonstrated promising therapeutic results although these have been somewhat limited. Aspects such as low in vivo MSC survival in inhospitable disease microenvironments, requirements for ex vivo cell overexpansion prior to infusions, intrinsic differences between MSC and different sources and donors, variability of culturing protocols, and potency assays to evaluate MSC products have been described as limitations in the field. In recent years, priming approaches to empower MSC have been investigated, thereby generating cellular products with improved potential for different clinical applications. Herein, we review the current priming approaches that aim to increase MSC therapeutic efficacy. Priming with cytokines and growth factors, hypoxia, pharmacological drugs, biomaterials, and different culture conditions, as well as other diverse molecules, are revised from current and future perspectives.


Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are components of the tissue stroma of all adult organs and, in all probability, are located at perivascular sites, where they play an important role in tissue homeostasis, surveillance, repair, and remodeling [1,2,3]. MSC are a heterogeneous cell population characterized by spontaneous adherence to plastic; they have a typical immunophenotypic profile (expression of surface markers CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105, and lack of CD34, CD45, CD14, and HLA-DR) and multilineage-differentiation potential into osteocytes, adipocytes, and chondrocytes [4]. MSC isolated from different tissue sources show different cellular composition, lineage-specific differentiation potential, and self-renewal capabilities [4].

MSC have been investigated in cell-based therapies because of their remarkable anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, immunomodulatory, and regenerative properties [5, 6], which involve both paracrine and cell-to-cell contact mechanisms. Paracrine effects depend on MSC secretome, which includes many bioactive molecules, such as growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and microvesicles/exosomes carrying proteins and/or miRNAs to target cells [5,6,7].

MSC secretome also contains large amounts of immunoregulatory factors, which are capable of modulating innate and adaptive immune responses [6]. One of the major immunosuppression mechanisms of human MSC is the production of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). IDO is involved in the l-tryptophan catabolism leading to its depletion in the surrounding microenvironment and accumulation of kinurenin, which then inhibits T cell activation, proliferation, and functional activity of T cells, DCs, and NK cells and Th17 differentiation, among other effects [8]. Several molecules produced by MSC are able to influence (suppress or modulate) the immune responses, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin (IL-10), nitric oxide (NO), human leukocyte antigen-G molecules (HLA-G5), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). The detailed mechanisms by which these molecules suppress or modulate the immune cells are still not completely understood and are beyond the scope of the review. Another important mechanism thereby MSC suppress and/or modulate the immune response is via generation and/or expansion of immune regulatory cells [6].

Under homeostatic conditions, MSC express low levels of class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and do not express class II MHC and costimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80, and CD86). Therefore, in homeostatic conditions, MSC are considered hypoimmunogenic and have immune evasion abilities, which make them suitable for allogeneic transplantation settings [8]. However, under inflammatory conditions, mainly enriched by pro-inflammatory cytokines as interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and interleukin-1 (IL-1β), MSC are “licensed/activated/primed,” thereby upregulate class I/II MHC and costimulatory molecules, display improved proliferation and survival conditions, and acquire enhanced immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive functions, as further detailed reviewed in the next section.

MSC are capable of migrating to inflammatory sites due to high expression of chemokine receptors, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and adhesion molecules [4]. Their important role in tissue regeneration is based on (i) the “empowering” of resident cells (such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and tissue progenitors) by the secretion of bioactive molecules that induce cellular proliferation and differentiation and (ii) the differentiation into functional mesodermal cells which replace damaged cells [5, 9].

In summary, the therapeutic potential of MSC is attributed to their ability to undergo lineage-specific differentiation, to modulate the immune system, and to secrete important bioactive factors [10]. Therefore, MSC are very attractive candidates for cell-based therapies in immune-mediated, inflammatory, and degenerative diseases [5, 9]. Indeed, a huge number of preclinical studies and about 900 clinical trials have been reported in the past 10 years (source:; however, many of them have shown therapeutic failure, especially in humans [6, 7].

MSC properties are influenced by in vivo and in vitro biological, biochemical, and biophysical factors, which tightly regulate MSC functions and survival [11] through reciprocal interactions between the cells, extracellular matrix (ECM), and soluble bioactive factors. MSC interact with surrounding tissues and cells in a three-dimensional space, regulating the ECM, therefore promoting angiogenesis, producing anti-inflammatory molecules, preventing cell death (anti-apoptotic effects), and modulating the immune system [12]. In this context, the major current challenge in MSC-based therapy is to develop in vitro culture methods that mimic the natural MSC niche, while at the same time allowing cell expansion at a clinical-grade scale, not compromising cell quality attributes and function.

To date, several studies have demonstrated that the modulation of biological, biochemical, and/or biophysical factors can influence MSC fate, lineage-specific differentiation, and functions and also enhance their therapeutic potential [12, 13]. One of the first reported approaches was cell priming (also referred to as licensing or preconditioning) with pro-inflammatory mediators [11, 14,15,16,17]. Cell priming consists of preparing cells for some specific function or lineage-specific differentiation, which involves cell activation, molecular signaling, genetic or epigenetic modifications, and morphology/phenotype changes. This concept is commonly used in the immunology field, and it has been adapted for the stem cell scope. For example, pro-inflammatory cytokine (such as interferon-γ) may be added to the medium during MSC culture to augment their anti-inflammatory effects [16].

Several priming approaches have been proposed in the last years to improve MSC function, survival, and therapeutic efficacy [14]. Here, we have divided these approaches into five categories: (a) MSC priming with inflammatory cytokines or mediators, (b) MSC priming with hypoxia, (c) MSC priming with pharmacological drugs and chemical agents, (d) MSC priming with biomaterials and different culture conditions, and (e) MSC priming with other molecules (Fig. 1). In this comprehensive and updated review, we address available priming approaches and discuss their potentials and limitations, as well as the perspectives of this research field.

Fig. 1

Overview of the production of primed MSC for the treatment of different disease types. Six steps for primed MSC production are indicated: tissue source selection, MSC isolation, MSC priming (the four main classes of priming approaches currently available are represented), MSC expansion, MSC product formulation, MSC administration, and application in different disease types. The rationale is to use different MSC sources/priming approaches for different clinical applications

MSC priming with cytokines

Many studies have demonstrated the effects of MSC priming with pro-inflammatory cytokines or growth factors. This strategy aims to improve the immunosuppressive function and to increase their secretion of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory factors [11, 14,15,16] (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Table 1 Priming of MSC with cytokines and growth factors
Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the main priming approaches to improve MSC therapeutic efficacy. Priming with a cytokines or growth factors, b pharmacological or chemical agents, c hypoxia, d 3D culture conditions. Priming factors/agents and their respectively triggered mechanisms are linked by arrows and boxes of the same color. Released soluble factors are represented in continuous-line boxes, while other upregulated molecules (such as transcription factors, metalloproteinases, chemokine receptors, and enzymes) are represented in dashed-line boxes. The general priming effects on MSC (immunomodulatory, migratory, regenerative, immunosuppressive and migration, angiogenic, survival and engraftment, anti-apoptotic, increase stemness) triggered by the priming factor/agent are indicated in yellow boxes at the bottom of each figure

IFN-γ priming

Priming or preconditioning with IFN-γ enhances the immunosuppressive properties of MSC. Upon IFN-γ priming, MSC upregulate IDO, secrete important immunomodulatory molecules, such as PGE2, HGF, TGF-β, and CCL2, increase the expression of class I and class II histocompatibility leucocyte antigen (HLA) molecules and of co-stimulatory molecules [18].

Preconditioning of Warton’s jelly-derived MSC (WJ-MSC) with IFN-γ leads to the upregulation of immunosuppressive factors (IDO and HLA-G5), chemokine ligands (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), and adhesion proteins (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1). It has been demonstrated that upon co-culturing of IFN-γ-primed MSC with activated lymphocytes, there is decreased production of IFN-γ and TNF-α, increased secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-10 (IL-10), increased frequency of CD4+CD25+CD127dim/− T cells, and decreased frequency of Th17 cells [19].

MSC primed with IFN-γ also inhibit T-cell effector functions through the upregulation of programmed cell death-1 ligands (PDL-1), at the same time, but independently of IDO upregulation [20].

Noone and coworkers demonstrated that IFN-γ-preconditioned MSC suppressed NK activation more efficiently than non-preconditioned MSC. IFN-γ-primed MSC inhibited IFN-γ secretion from NK cells, being partially mediated by IDO and prostaglandin-E2 (PGE-2). Additionally, preconditioning with IFN-γ increased the expression of class I HLA molecules and reduced the expression of the activating ligand NKG2D on the surface of MSC, decreasing their susceptibility to NK cytotoxicity [21].

In comparative proteomic analyses of human bone marrow-derived MSC (BM-MSC) primed with IFN-γ, 210 proteins with significantly altered expressions were identified, 169 of which were overexpressed (for example IDO, PDL-1, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and BST-2) and 41 downregulated (for example ANTXR1, APCDD1L, NPR3, FADS2) [22].

Vigo and coworkers reported that immunosuppressive properties of murine MSC primed with IFN-γ were related to early phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT1/STAT3), as well as inhibition of mTOR activity, which leads to the upregulation of genes associated with immunoregulation and downregulation of genes related to differentiation, proliferation, and stemness. In human MSC, the inhibition of the mTOR pathway also enhances their immunoregulatory potential [23].

Notably, IFN-γ-preconditioning prior to MSC cryopreservation was able to improve the immunosuppressive properties after thawing. Similarly with fresh-MSC, thawed IFN-γ-preconditioned MSC were capable of inhibiting T cell proliferation and cytotoxic T cell degranulation via IDO secretion [24]. Moreover, thawed IFN-γ-preconditioned MSC presented lower susceptibility to host T cell cytolysis, compared to untreated MSC. However, the preconditioning of MSC with IFN-γ was not able to revert the homing defect post thaw [24]. The same group has recently shown that IFN-γ-preconditioning can re-establish immunosuppressive properties of senescent MSC by the activation of regulatory molecules, such as IDO. Preconditioning with IFN-γ did not upregulate class-II HLA (HLA-DR) molecules on the surface of senescent MSC, which occurred on early passage MSC [25].

In experimental colitis, human IFN-γ-primed MSC showed higher migration rates to inflammatory sites and a significant reduction of mucosal damage and inflammatory responses, compared with non-primed MSC [26]. On the contrary, Burand and coworkers have recently shown that infusion of thawed IFN-γ-primed human MSC failed to ameliorate a murine model of retinal disease [27]. Noteworthy, several studies have demonstrated that priming with IFN-γ or other inflammatory cytokines leads to upregulation of class I and class II HLA molecules, which makes them more immunogenic and therefore more susceptible to recognition by host immune cells, and subsequently, there is rapid clearance in vivo following administration, especially in xenogeneic transplantation settings [28].

TNF-α priming

TNF-α priming promotes upregulation of immunoregulatory factors on MSC, such as PGE2, IDO, and HGF, however much less pronounced compared with IFN-γ priming [29]. As an alternative, the combination of inflammatory cytokines for priming MSC may lead to additional effects. In this context, preconditioning with both TNF-α and IFN-γ is capable to increase factor H production by MSC, which potently inhibits complement activation in dose- and time-dependent manners. Factor H production by MSC is significantly suppressed by the inhibition of PGE2 and IDO [30].

François and colleagues have demonstrated that IFN-γ and TNF-α priming increases IDO activity in MSC, which results in monocyte differentiation into IL-10-secreting M2 immunosuppressive macrophages (CD14+/CD206+). Those differentiated M2 macrophages were then implicated in the suppression of T cell proliferation via IL-10 secretion, thereby amplifying the immunosuppressive properties of MSC [31].

Priming of murine MSC lines with both IFN-γ and TNF-α enhances their anti-proliferative effects on T cell proliferation assays and involves increased expression of the nitric oxide synthetase 2 (NOS2) gene, which results in enhanced production of nitric oxide which is an important immunosuppressive molecule in murine models [32]. MSC primed with IFN-γ and TNF-α were also capable of inhibiting delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in vivo [23, 32].

The expression of IDO decreases after medium removal and freeze-thawing the MSC products [33]. However, preconditioning of MSC with IFN-γ and TNF-α induces chromatin remodeling in the IDO1 promoter, which correlates with increased H3K9 (histone H3 at lysine 9) acetylation concomitantly with a reduction in trimethylated H3K9. Curiously, these chromatin alterations are maintained even after the cryopreservation process. Upon re-exposure to cytokines, previously IFN-γ-treated MSC are able to quickly accumulate high IDO1 mRNA levels [33].

Nevertheless, MSC from different donors primed with TNF-α and IFN-γ exhibit variable suppressive effects upon T cell proliferation, probably due to variable upregulation of IDO activity [31]. Amati and coworkers have shown significant differences in the inhibitory potential of MSC from different cord blood-derived samples, particularly following priming with TNF-α and IFN-γ [34].

IL-17 priming

IL-17 is another pro-inflammatory cytokine that has been used for MSC priming in some studies. Increased proliferation of human and murine BM-MSC was demonstrated upon dose-dependent IL-17 priming [35,36,37]. In human MSC, this effect was dependent on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from the activation of the adapter molecule ACT-1 and TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF-6). IL-17 priming was able to induce greater migration, motility, and osteoblastic differentiation of MSC [36]. However, there are some conflicting results in the literature.

Some studies show that IL-17 promotes osteogenic differentiation [36, 38] and inhibits adipogenic differentiation of human MSC by enhancing IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA expression during the differentiation process [39]. In contrast, osteogenic differentiation is suppressed in murine MSC by IL-17 priming via IκB kinase and factor nuclear kappa B (NFκB) [40]. Kondo et al. showed that IL-17 inhibits chondrogenic differentiation of human MSC through suppression of the protein kinase A and consequently decreased phosphorylation of SOX9, a transcription factor involved in chondrogenesis [41]. Another study showed that IL-17 does not affect the differentiation potential of murine BM-MSC [42]. Together, these results suggest that the phenotypic profile, functional heterogeneity, differentiation potential, and the response to inflammatory priming of MSC may be influenced by their origin (species and the tissue source).

Murine BM and adipose tissue (AT)-derived MSC primed with IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-γ have increased T cell immunosuppressive capacity mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) production. MSC primed with this synergic combination of cytokines were also able to reduce inflammation and tissue injury in murine model of hepatitis, also by an iNOS-dependent mechanism [43].

Human BM-MSC, preconditioned with IL-17, presented the immunophenotype, morphology, and class I MHC expression levels comparable to untreated MSC. There was no increased expression of class II MHC and co-stimulatory molecules in MSC, therefore maintaining their hypoimmunogenic phenotype [44]. Functional studies showed that IL-17-primed MSC presented higher immunosuppressive potential upon proliferating T cells, which was attributed not to IDO, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), or TGF-β, but to increased IL-6 expression. In this study, IL-17-primed MSC inhibited T cell secretion of Th1 cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2) and promoted the generation of iTreg cells [44]. Subsequently, 67 differentially expressed genes mainly associated with migration and chemostatic responses (such as MMP1, MMP13, and CXCL6) were identified between IL-17-primed and untreated MSC [44].

Other combinatory strategies of pro-inflammatory cytokines

MSC from distinct sources might respond differently to priming with combinations of pro-inflammatory factors [45]. Pro-inflammatory cytokine cocktails markedly induced the expression of immunoregulatory molecules and cell-adhesion proteins in MSC from different tissue sources. Notably, only BM-MSC presented a slight increase in HLA-DR expression. In addition, WJ-MSC constitutively produce the highest levels of HGF, which are increased after priming with pro-inflammatory cytokine cocktail [45].

MSC derived from AT, BM, foreskin, or Wharton’s jelly, primed with an pro-inflammatory cytokine cocktail (IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-α, and IFN-γ), presented different expression levels of the immunoregulatory genes FGL2, GAL, SEMA4D, SEMA7A, and IDO1 [46, 47]. In primed foreskin-derived MSC, 16 miRNAs were differentially expressed, 13 of which were downregulated (miR-27a, miR-145, miR-149, miR-194, miR-199a, miR-221, miR-328, miR-345, miR-423-5p, miR-485-3p, miR-485-5p, miR-615-5p, and miR-758) and 3 were upregulated (miR-155, miR-363, and miR-886-3p). These miRNAs are important to regulate immune responses and have already been related to the differentiation potential and immunomodulatory function of MSC [46].

Human MSC treated with a combination of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-23 displayed similar morphology, immunophenotype, co-stimulatory molecule expression profiling (except for up-regulation of CD45), and suppressive ability of allogeneic T cell proliferation, compared with untreated MSC. These primed MSC produced higher levels of TGF-β and lower levels of IL-4 than untreated MSC. The authors suggested that pro-inflammatory cytokines upregulate MSC efficacy for therapy of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders [48].

LPS/TNF-α-primed murine MSC have induced in vitro polarization of M2 macrophage (immunomodulatory macrophage profile, expressing Arg1high and CD206high), compared with untreated MSC. Increased PGE2 secretion was associated with high expression of arginase-1 by LPS/TNF-α-primed murine MSC [49]. Moreover, LPS/TNF-α-primed MSC showed increased alkaline phosphate activity and bone mineralization capacity [49, 50].

Global transcriptome profiling of human BM-MSC primed with IL-1β revealed upregulation of genes related to several biological processes linked to NF-κB pathway, such as cell survival, migration and adhesion, chemokine production, induction of angiogenesis, and modulation of the immune response [51]. Additionally, preconditioning of umbilical cord-derived MSC (UC-MSC) with IL-1β resulted in increased immunosuppressive capacities and migration ability to inflammatory sites, being sufficient to attenuate the development of murine colitis. Moreover, IL-1β-primed MSC upregulated the expression of CXCR4, COX-2, IL-6, and IL-8 genes, and the infusion of these cells led to the polarization of peritoneal M2 macrophages, increased frequencies of Treg and Th2 cells, and decreased percentage of Th1 and Th17 cells in the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes [52].

Preconditioning of MSC from different donors with IL-1α or IL-1β induced high secretion of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Conditioned media of primed MSC induced a stronger response of immortalised mouse microglial BV2 cells in the presence of bacterial LPS, evidenced by decreased secretion of inflammatory mediators, such as IL-6 and TNF-a, and increased production of IL-10, an important immunoregulatory cytokine. These results, therefore, support the potential use of pre-conditioning of MSC in future therapies for inflammatory disorders [53].

UC-MSC primed with TGF-β1 displayed increased proliferation and marked upregulation of extracellular matrix genes, notably fibronectin. TGF-β1-primed MSC survived longer in damaged lungs and reduced the severity of lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury [54]. Additionally, some studies have demonstrated that TGF-β1 is capable of inducing the mobilization and migration of BM-MSC to bone remodeling. N-cadherin-mediated intercellular interactions and noncanonical signaling molecules activated through TGF-β type I receptor, such as Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and p38, are required to increase the migration capacity of MSC [55].

Besides cytokines, growth factors have been explored for preconditioning of MSC, aiming to improve their properties and therapeutic efficacy. Dental pulp-derived MSC (DP-MSC) preconditioned with fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) exhibited higher angiogenic potential by secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and HGF, compared with hypoxia conditioning. In addition, FGF-2 priming increased the number of cells expressing Stro-1 and CD146 progenitor markers on MSC cultures [56].

To summarize, many pro-inflammatory cytokines or growth factors have been used for priming of MSC isolated from different species and/or tissues. As a general effect, pro-inflammatory priming increases the immunosuppressive properties of MSC by stimulating the secretion of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory factors. Three disadvantages can be pointed out, which are the increased immunogenicity of MSC after priming, high costs of priming with recombinant cytokines, and variable response of MSC from different sources upon pro-inflammatory priming.

MSC priming with hypoxia

Oxygen availability in the tissues depends on vascularization and metabolic activity and is much lower than in the environment or under normoxic cell culture conditions (20–21%). Oxygen availability in the bone marrow, as an example, can range from 1 to 7%. In neonatal tissues such as the placenta and UC, considered highly promising sources of MSC due to superior plasticity and shorter doubling time, oxygen tension rarely exceeds 5%. Cells in these hypoxic tissues are already physiologically adapted to these conditions.

In this context, MSC expansion in environments with high levels of oxygen may lead to cellular stress. Later, when transplanted in vivo, these ex vivo expanded cells must re-adapt to the new environment [57]. High environmental levels of O2 can lead to early senescence, extension of population doubling time, and DNA damage [58,59,60,61].

Several studies have already demonstrated that MSC cultured under hypoxic conditions have increased proliferation and secrete various soluble bioactive factors [18, 62]. Under hypoxic conditions, MSC also have high angiogenic and regenerative potentials [63] as well as extended survival in damaged tissues after transplantation [64]. (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Table 2 Priming of MSC with hypoxia

UC-MSC cultured under hypoxic conditions usually adapt to reduced oxygen consumption and demonstrate greater proliferative capacity; reduced or absent cellular apoptosis rates; induction of HIF-1α (hypoxia-induced factor-1 alpha); elevation of PDK-1, GLUT-1, and LDH gene expression (associated with energy metabolism); and reduction of mitochondrial respiration [57]. Consequently, hypoxia-primed MSC present increased glucose consumption, lower reactive oxygen species production, lower telomeric shortening rates, and decreased cellular senescence [57].

Interestingly, increased HIF-1α expression associates with high expression of chemokine receptors in MSC, such as CXCR4, CXCR7, and CX3CR1, which are involved in the trafficking and homing of transplanted MSC to target tissues [59].

Exposure of MSC to hypoxia induces anti-apoptotic mechanisms through phosphorylation of AKT and BAD, increased expression of BCL-XL and BAG-1, reduced caspase-3/7 activity, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and increased VEGF secretion [65].

Zhilai and coworkers showed that hypoxia-preconditioned UC-MSC produce higher levels of VEGF, HGF, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In addition, in a rat model of spinal cord injury, transplantation of hypoxia-preconditioned UC-MSC led to higher migration potential and engraftment, increased cell survival, reduced apoptosis, and inflammatory infiltration, which were associated with axonal regeneration and improved tissue function [66].

Placenta-derived MSC primed with hypoxia showed increased expression of adhesion molecules, including fibronectin 1 (FN1), E-cadherin (CDH1), N-cadherin (N-CAD or CDH2), and integrins (ITGA2, ITGA5, ITGB1, ITGB3, ITGB5) required for angiogenesis. In addition, they presented increased in vitro angiogenic potential, expression of glucose transporters (GLUT-1, GLUT-2, GLUT-3), and insulin secretion upon glucose stimulation, which are vital for the wound healing process [67].

Hypoxia induces upregulation of GRP78 (78-kDa glucose-regulated protein) through increased HIF-1α expression in human AT-MSC [68]. Subsequently, hypoxia-induced GRP78 regulates Akt, mTOR, and p70S6k phosphorylation, indicating that hypoxic preconditioning enhances MSC proliferation and migration through the Akt signaling pathway. This effect has been demonstrated in a murine hindlimb ischemia model, through regulation of stress- and apoptosis-associated proteins and increased secretion of angiogenic factors such as hVEGF, hHGF, and hFGF [68] (Table 2).

The expression pattern of miRNA is related to MSC fate [69, 70]. In this context, hypoxia preconditioning induced early miR-675-5p upregulation and subsequent angiogenic response by increasing VEGF secretion and VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR-1/FLT-1) expression. In addition, miR-675-5p inhibition caused a reduction of HIF1A gene expression and upregulation of HIF1A negative regulators, suggesting its role in the stabilization of HIF1A. Overexpression of miR-675-5p caused downregulation of stemness markers (CD44, CD90, and CD73) and promoted expansion of the chondro-osteoblast precursor markers in vitro [71].

Gonzalez-King and colleagues have demonstrated that HIF-1α-overexpressing MSC secrete higher amounts of exosomes compared to control MSC. These exosomes show overexpressed miRNA content, including miR-15, miR-16, miR-17, miR-31, miR-126, miR-145, miR-221, miR-222, miR-320a, miR-424, and Notch pathway-related proteins [72]. Their results indicate that exosomes derived from MSC overexpressing HIF-1α have increased angiogenic capacity and could be applied to the treatment of ischemia-related diseases [72].

Hypoxic priming increases HIF-1α-dependent autophagy in MSC derived from bone marrow and Wharton’s jelly [73, 74]. Conditioned medium derived from WJ-MSC primed with hypoxia led to enlarged migration and tube formation from HUVECs. The angiogenic potential and secreted levels of angiogenin and VEGF were reduced by autophagy inhibition [74].

Preconditioning of AT-MSC with hypoxia and IFN-γ led to synergic effects [75]. The authors reported increased anti-proliferative capacity that correlated with higher secretion of IDO and HLA-G, and significant upregulation of proteins involved in gluconeogenesis [75]. Dual priming with hypoxia/IFN-γ decreased the production of VEGF and IL-8, increased the secretion of MCP-1 and IL-6, and increased endothelial cell migration in a “wound closure” assay [76].

The properties of hypoxia-primed-MSC have also been shown in murine disease models. Hypoxic-primed MSC showed metabolic alterations and enhanced survival after intramuscular injection into immune-deficient mice [77].

Hypoxia-preconditioned murine MSC demonstrated upregulation of pro-survival genes, with enhanced survival of engrafted cells, and increased secretion of anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidant, and growth factors. Bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrotic mice treated with hypoxia-preconditioned MSC showed improved pulmonary functions and reduced inflammation and fibrosis [78].

Similarly, hypoxic-preconditioned MSC showed increased cell viability, enhanced proliferation potential, decreased ROS production, and increased antioxidant GSH and SOD levels. Moreover, they presented higher HIF-1α and Akt expression levels, important in the resistance to hypoxia and ROS stress, which are essential in the transplantation setting [79]. In the murine model of radiation-induced lung injury, infusion of hypoxic-preconditioned MSC alleviated both early radiation-induced pneumonia and late pulmonary fibrosis. Notably, hypoxia-primed MSC displayed a more pronounced therapeutic effect compared to normoxia MSC [79].

In conclusion, hypoxia priming has been used to mimic the in vivo MSC niche conditions, aiming to improve the therapeutic efficacy of MSC from different species and/or tissues. In general, hypoxia priming greatly alters cell metabolism during expansion, increases resistance to oxidative stress, and thereby improves the engraftment, survival in ischemic microenvironments, and angiogenic potential of transplanted MSC.

MSC priming with pharmacological or chemical agents

Priming with pharmacological or chemical agents is a promising strategy to improve MSC engraftment and survival in damaged tissues and consequently the therapeutic efficacy [14]. Table 3 and Fig. 2 summarize some of these approaches to improve MSC-based therapies for different diseases and/or applications.

Table 3 Priming of MSC with pharmacological drugs and other chemical agents

MSC homing and engraftment are regulated by the interaction between stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and CXCR4 receptor [1]. In this context, low doses of histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and bioactive lipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are capable of activating UC-MSC. Thus, VPA/S1P priming improves MSC migratory activity in response to SDF-1, concomitant with the activation of both MAPKp42/44 and AKT signaling [80]. Moreover, MSC priming with VPA/S1P also augmented proliferation and anti-inflammatory activities [80]. In an experimental model of Huntington’s disease, priming of MSC with VPA and lithium, prior to intranasal delivery, enhanced the biological potential and therapeutic properties of MSC, evidenced by reduced neuropathological features and functional improvement [81].

Good vascularization remains an obstacle to proper tissue regeneration. Disorders such as spinal cord injury, cerebral ischemic disease, myocardial infarction, and diabetes mellitus are characterized by endothelial injury or dysfunction, impairing blood flow to injured areas. Vascular endothelial cells (VECs) derived from transplanted MSC may be used as an important therapeutic strategy. DNA methylation is involved in MSC differentiation in endothelial cells. The DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC), is able to induce differentiation of MSC in VECs in vitro by increasing the expression of endothelial markers and their angiogenic capacity [82].

Cardiovascular diseases (CDs), including myocardial infarction and ischemic heart diseases, are a major health problem worldwide [83]. Despite controversial results, MSC administration in patients with CDs promotes angiogenesis and myogenesis, restores cardiac stem cell niches, reduces infarcted area and scar formation, and improves cardiac function [64, 84,85,86]. The major problem of MSC-based therapies for CD is the low cell survival in the infarcted and ischemic areas [64]. In this context, preconditioning strategies may increase the survival of transplanted MSC in vivo.

As previously discussed, hypoxic-primed MSC have increased survival in damaged tissues after transplantation [64]. In this context, some studies have evaluated hypoxia-mimetizing chemical reagents for priming MSC. A recent study analyzed the influence of desferrioxamine (DFO) on BM-MSC proliferation, apoptosis, and metabolic changes. DFO is a hypoxia-mimetic reagent that decreases the activity of prolyl-hydroxylases and consequently inhibits HIF-1α hydroxylation. In low concentrations, DFO decreased mitochondrial activity and apoptosis and upregulated the expression of genes associated with glycolysis, including hexo-kinase 2 (HK2), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), BCL2-interacting protein 3 (BNIP3), lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), and VEGF, as well as genes related to cell viability and survival. The inhibitory effect of DFO upon MSC proliferation was associated with suppression of nucleic acid metabolism by reducing ribonucleotide reductase activity. The DFO-primed MSC also showed decreased adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation [87]; therefore, it is not suitable for the treatment of bone diseases.

Chemicals that inhibit the electron transportation chain, such as 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) [88], hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF-1, HIF-1α, HIF-1β), or prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) [89], also induce hypoxic environments. Preconditioning with DNP induces upregulation of adhesion and homing genes in MSC, as well as increased secretion of cardiomyogenic factors. Intramyocardial injection of DNP-conditioned MSC in infarcted rats showed good cellular engraftment and significant improvement of cardiac function, reduction of scar formation, improved angiogenesis, and maintenance of left ventricular wall thickness [90]. Similarly, MSC preconditioning with DMOG upregulates the expression of hypoxia survival and angiogenic factors, including HIF-1α and VEGF [91]. In a rat model of the ischemic heart, DMOG-primed MSC intramyocardially transplanted into peri-infarcted regions showed higher survival rates, enhanced angiogenesis, and improved heart function, compared with non-primed MSC [91].

The volatile anesthetic isoflurane (ISO) can be cytoprotective for MSC. In vitro preconditioning of BM-MSC with ISO (low doses and short treatment duration, 2% ISO for 4 h) increases cell viability and migration potential. There was hypoxia-induced upregulation of CXCR4 and HIF-1α, whereas no effect was observed in the expression of HIF-1β [92]. However, longer exposures to ISO at higher doses decreased MSC viability and migration potential. In a rat model of stroke, preconditioned ISO-MSC improved the function and engraftment into the ischemic brain [92].

In addition, MSC-based therapy has emerged as an option for bone and tendon tissue engineering and regeneration [93, 94]. Therefore, priming of MSC to improve engraftment and osteogenic/chondrogenic differentiation potentials may be convenient for the treatment of bone and tendon disorders. In this context, adenine-based purines may be used as biochemical priming factors/agents. The adenine-based purines, including nucleosides or adenosine, are ubiquitous substances released from several cells types and are able to interact with the adenosine receptor (AR) family, which regulates many physiological/pathological processes [95]. The selective agonist 15–60 nM 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (CCPA) interacts with the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R), thereby increasing the proliferation of human DP-MSC by activating WNT signaling. As well as this, CCPA enhances MSC osteogenic differentiation potential by the upregulation of the RUNX-2 and ALP expressions. Furthermore, extracellular matrix mineralization is improved by preconditioning of MSC with CCPA [96].

The source of cells also plays an important role in cell fate after priming. A1R expression is higher in AT-derived MSC than in DP-MSC. Accordingly, AT-MSC primed by CCPA substantially increased their osteogenic differentiation and titanium scaffold colonization. Thus, AT-MSC primed with CCPA could be advantageously used in regenerative orthopedics [97].

Considering that tenogenesis is a complex process, tendon repair is a clinical challenge [98]. The AKT-mTOR axis is involved in the synthesis of important proteins for tenocyte differentiation and tendon homeostasis, including type I collagen (Col-I) and other extracellular matrix proteins. In experimental models, mTOR depletion has been associated with tendon defects, and MSC priming with protenogenic growth factor (PGF), TGF-β1, and insulin growth factor (IGF) upregulates mTOR expression and signaling. On the other hand, statin treatment abrogates mTOR signaling and reduces the expression of Col-I and tenascin during in vitro MSC tenogenesis and in injured tendon tissues [98]. In conclusion, the increase of the AKT-mTOR axis signaling in MSC, by specific priming, leads to improved tendon differentiation and may constitute a novel therapeutic approach to tendinopathies and tendon injuries (Table 3).

The inhibition of the mTOR-signaling pathway by rapamycin has different effects on MSC. Short exposure of BM-MSC to rapamycin, just before coculturing with activated human CD4+ T cells or mouse splenocytes, decreased mTOR signaling and enhances their in vitro immunosuppressive properties by COX-2 and PGE2 upregulation, independently of the inflammatory stimulus. Conversely, such effects were not observed after prolonged exposure of MSC to rapamycin [99].

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) binds to nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and is also used as a priming factor. ATRA plays critical roles in cell growth, including differentiation, apoptosis, and immune function. Preconditioning of rat BM-MSC with ATRA upregulates COX-2, HIF-1, CXCR4, CCR2, VEGF, Ang-2, and Ang-4 gene expressions. In vivo, ATRA-primed MSC enhanced wound healing potential [100]. Priming of mouse BM-MSC with ATRA has demonstrated significant therapeutic benefits in an experimental emphysema model. In this work, ATRA led to the activation of p70S6k1, thereby improving lung tissue repair and MSC survival [101].

In addition, human BM-MSC primed with ATRA, when cocultured in vitro with activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, secreted high levels of IL-6 and induced the expansion of Treg subsets. Moreover, ATRA-primed MSC modulated the inflammatory cytokine profile of PBMC from AS patients, reducing the secretion of TNF-α, IL-17A, and IFN-γ [102] (Table 3).

Taken together, these studies demonstrate potentially beneficial effects of MSC priming with pharmacological drugs or chemical agents. Although their effects vary greatly, most stimuli improve MSC survival and increase their differentiation potential and regenerative and/or immunomodulatory properties.

MSC priming with biomaterials or different culture conditions

Several studies have demonstrated that the modulation of the biochemical and biophysical microenvironment may influence MSC fate and also enhance their therapeutic potential [12, 103, 104]. Strategies to modulate the environment include the use of specific biomaterials for tissue engineering applications, three-dimensional (3D) MSC cultures, and cell treatment with different culture conditions (lineage-specific and conditioned culture medium), among others (Table 4, and Fig. 2).

Table 4 Priming of MSC with biomaterials or different culture conditions

ECM is an important component of the bone marrow niche, acting as a physical support for cell adhesion in a 3D environment. In order to mimic the MSC niche, researchers have explored the use of different 3D biomaterials for cell culture [11]. In fact, MSC applications in tissue engineering are largely associated with the development of biomaterials, which can direct MSC fate towards the desired phenotype and also provide a microenvironment that allows for structural and biochemical cellular support, thereby enhancing tissue healing [105]. Moreover, biomaterial-based approaches could protect cells from death due to anoikis and/or inflammation, facilitating their homing [14]. MSC can be explored for many tissue-engineering therapies in the repair of cartilage, bone, cardiac, and/or skeletal defects [106,107,108,109,110] (Table 4).

The ideal biomaterial for cell culture should be able to provide reproducibility, biocompatibility, and clinical relevance for a particular disease [111]. Other important aspects to be considered in this setting are the biomaterial characteristics, including stiffness, topography, geometry, and chemical composition [112, 113]. Engler and coworkers [114] described, for the first time, that matrix stiffness influences MSC lineage differentiation. They demonstrated that the elasticity of the matrices used for MSC growth could modulate cell differentiation and result in distinct phenotypes. When cells were cultured in soft substrates, they exhibited a neuronal phenotype. Yet, matrices with intermediate stiffness stimulated myogenic differentiation, and rigid materials induced an osteogenic phenotype [114].

Similarly, biomaterial topography also influences MSC differentiation. Wu and coworkers tested the effects of various nano-topographical patterns to induce MSC towards chondrogenic differentiation. Different material topographies triggered changes in MSC differentiation, underscoring the importance of incorporating topographical design in biomaterials for tissue engineering [103].

Biomaterials can be classified as natural and synthetic matrices. Natural matrices include alginates, collagen, fibrin, chitosanes, gelatine, and hyaluronates, while synthetic scaffolds include bioresorbable polymers, such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA), polyethylene, and polypropylene. Biomaterials can be modified to improve cellular activities and functionality by incorporating functional groups, side chains, chemotactic factors, or matrix proteins [115]. For example, by immobilizing RGD (Arg–Gly–Asp) motifs in alginate microspheres, researchers were able to enhance MSC attachment, growth, and angiogenesis [116].

Cartilage defects due to age, osteoarthritis, trauma, and developmental disorders may cause joint pain and loss of mobility [117]. MSC in culture can be induced to differentiate into chondrocytes in polymeric scaffolds, such as alginate, collagen-hydrogel, hyaluronan, and chitosan [104, 118,119,120].

MSC have become one of the most promising cell types for bone tissue engineering applications. Accordingly, bone has become the second most frequently transplanted tissue in the world [121]. The combination of distinct reagents for culture medium supplementation and biomaterials successfully induces MSC differentiation into osteoblasts. MSC culture with dexamethasone, ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AsAP), and β-glycerophosphate resulted in calcium matrix deposition and the expression of late osteogenesis markers [122].

The most used biomaterials for this purpose are hydroxyapatite [123], poly-l-lactic-acid (PLLA) [124], tyrosine-derived polycarbonates copolymerized with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [125], and mineralized collagen [126] (Table 4).

Hydrogels are an ideal physicochemical mimetic of natural ECM. MSC suspension and/or encapsulation in hydrogel matrices could improve cell viability and survival. The viscosity of hydrogel reduces mechanical forces applied in the syringe-based administration, significantly diminishing MSC loss during the procedure [14]. In addition, MSC encapsulation/culture in hydrogel improves osteogenic [127] and chondrogenic [128] differentiation, accelerates normal wound healing, and promotes neovascularization [129, 130], cell viability, homing, and proliferation [12, 131].

Since the behavior of MSC is strongly regulated by the environment to which they are exposed, the composition of culture medium could be modified and adapted to achieve the desired MSC phenotype, differentiation, and/or therapeutic potential.

Glucose is the main source used by cells to generate ATP, and it has been demonstrated that the glucose concentration in the culture medium results in altered MSC properties, specifically impacting multilineage differentiation. Li and coworkers showed that MSC exposed to high glucose medium (25 mM) reduced the colony forming activity and induced premature senescence [132]. On the other hand, the osteogenic potential of MSC was higher when the cells were cultured with high-glucose medium compared with low-glucose medium [11]. Tsai et al. also found that high-glucose medium for MSC expansion decreases the chondrogenic capacity by modulation of protein kinase C (PKC) and TGF-β signaling molecules [133].

Khan and coworkers used a different approach based on the use of conditioned medium from cardiomyocytes exposed to oxidative stress and high glucose. MSC cultured in this medium presented increased survival, proliferation, angiogenic potential, and beneficial therapeutic effects when transplanted into the hearts of diabetic animals [134].

In addition to using biomaterials that drive MSC differentiation towards specific phenotypes, a scaffold-free 3D cell culture could be a promising approach to culture undifferentiated MSC. 3D cultured MSC presented significant differences regarding cellular phenotype and biological response compared to monolayer culture. Significant differences were detected between the cellular phenotype and biological response, when compared to traditional monolayer cultures. MSC functionality depends on physical microenvironment, and experiments using cell aggregates show that cell-cell interactions, as well as cell polarity, are essential [105]. 3D culture, also known as multicellular spheroids, facilitates greater cell-cell contact and interaction of cells with the ECM, mimicking in vivo development and signaling activity, thus improving therapeutic properties of human MSC [135]. Currently, it is well-known that MSC cultured in spheroids have enhanced angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative effects with improved cell survival after infusion [136].

The organization of MSC into aggregates can be achieved by low attachment plates, hanging drop method, and stirred systems (e.g., spinner flasks, stirred-tank bioreactors). Suspension culture in ultra-low attachment plates (e.g., Corning® Costar® Ultra-Low Attachment plates) is easy to handle; however, it can produce spheroids with different sizes, compromising reproducibility [137]. Hanging drop cultures allow cells to aggregate by gravity, forming a sphere at the bottom of the drop. The size of the sphere can be controlled by the volume of the drop or by the cell concentration [138]. Efforts have been made to produce spheroids in a scalable and reproducible (size distribution) manner. Stirred cultures (stirred tank bioreactor/spinner flasks) employ constant agitation to minimize cellular attachment to the flask surface, creating more homogeneous spheroids in a large scale. Hildebrandt and coworkers showed improved nutrient delivery and increased MSC viability using flasks on a rotating platform [139].

Bartosh and coworkers [140] showed that the potent anti-inflammatory effect exerted by MSC spheroids is attributed to higher levels of expression of the TSG-6 (TNF-stimulated gene 6 protein), a protein with both anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects [140]. MSC in spheroids enhance immunosuppressive effects by upregulating PGE2 and HGF levels [141]. Cheng and coworkers showed that AT-MSC cultured in spheroids expressed significantly higher levels of pluripotency markers (CXCR4, Nanog, Sox2, and Oct4), leading to the conclusion that 3D configuration also increases MSC stemness [142]. In addition, spheroid formation increases survival of MSC after infusion [143], augments tissue regenerative properties, and more importantly, reduces in vitro senescence [136].

In conclusion, these studies have demonstrated that the modulation of the biochemical and biophysical microenvironment indeed influences MSC differentiation potential, phenotype, and their therapeutic potential [12, 103, 104]. These approaches are very promising as the cell engineering field is growing rapidly.

MSC priming with other molecules

Most of the MSC priming approaches using other molecules are focused on maximizing their therapeutic potential, mostly by boosting defensive/protective cellular mechanisms in order to escape from the detrimental effects of the host (Table 5, Fig. 2).

Table 5 Priming of MSC with other molecules

Non-selective (or non-specific) priming approaches stimulate wide effector molecules and signaling pathways [144]. Exogenous danger signals, such as Poly(I:C) or LPS, respectively involved in virus or microbial infections, are agonists for Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling. Priming with Poly(I:C) directs MSC polarization into an immunosuppressive phenotype through TLR3 activation. However, LPS activates TLR4 signaling, leading MSC into a more pro-inflammatory profile [145].

MSC priming with low-dose LPS increases the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6 and TNF-α) and of regenerative factors (e.g., HGF and VEGF). The conditioned medium from LPS-primed MSC is able to improve liver regeneration and function [146]. Sangiorgi and coworkers demonstrated that TLR4 stimulation by LPS restricted the suppressive ability of MSC by increasing gene expression of IL-1β and IL-6. On the other hand, MSC stimulation with DSP30 induces TLR9 signaling, leading to reduced TNF-α expression, increased TGF-β1 expression, increased percentages of BM-MSC double positive for CD39 and CD73, and adenosine levels. As a consequence, MSC presented higher proliferative and suppressive potentials [147].

Some studies have demonstrated that melatonin priming can induce chondrogenic differentiation of MSC [148,149,150]. Melatonin-primed MSC greatly improved renal function in the diabetic nephropathy model, which was correlated with autophagy activation [151]. In a skin wound model, the melatonin-primed MSC also enhanced wound healing and showed increased motility by reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton via FAK/paxillin phosphorylation and melatonin receptor 2 [152]. Shuai and collaborators showed that melatonin priming may prevent the dysfunction and therapeutic failure of long-term passaging MSC in experimental osteoporosis or colitis models [153].

MSC priming with LL-37, a host defense peptide member of the cathelicidin family, enhances the expression of TLR3 and immunosuppressive factors IDO, IL-10, and TGF-β, but no effects were observed in T cell proliferation. In another study, LL-37-primed MSC showed increased migration and higher suppressive effect over T cell proliferation [154].

Priming of MSC with LL-37 and bioactive lipid shingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) improved the therapeutic efficacy of MSC in pulmonary artery hypertension model [155]. S1P/LL-37 priming increased the chemotactic and clonogenic activities of MSC. In addition, this dual priming enhances MSC anti-inflammatory potential by reducing the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, such as CCL2, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12. Particularly, S1P conditioning reduces TNF-α secretion from LPS-activated macrophages and enhanced angiogenesis by the secretion of VEGFα, CXCR4, PDGF, HGF, and angiopoietin-1 [155].

The hormone dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulates MSC proliferation, migration, and tissue engraftment. In addition, DHT-primed MSC contribute to cardiac regeneration [156]. Other studies have explored the effects of Apelin-13 peptide priming on MSC differentiation, proliferation, and survival in ischemic models. Apelin-13 is an endogenous ligand for the angiotensin receptor. Under hypoxic and normoxic conditions, apelin-13 improves MSC survival through anti-apoptotic effects and promotes the angiogenic properties [157, 158]. Apelin also promotes the upregulation of the autophagy mechanism in MSC, which is related to cellular survival [158].

Diabetes mellitus is a common risk factor for cardiac disease in elderly patients. In these patients, diabetes may impair MSC therapeutic effects. The preconditioning with oxytocin, a hypothalamus hormone, recovered the regenerative and angiogenic properties of diabetes-impaired MSC and consequently improved cardiac function and decreased cardiac tissue fibrosis [159].

Curcumin is a natural antioxidant that protects tissues from oxidative stress and stimulates regeneration [160]. In vivo and in vitro approaches using curcumin priming empowered the regenerative potential of MSC by increasing cell viability and retention, enhancing angiogenesis by VEGF secretion, and reducing apoptosis via heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) and PTEN/Akt/p53 signaling pathway activation [160]. In addition, rat BM-MSC preconditioned with curcumin showed impaired adipogenesis and increased osteogenesis by superexpression of HO-1 [161].

Liu and coworkers demonstrated that Ang1-preconditioning had increased MSC survival and decreased their apoptotic rate in vitro. Ang1 preconditioning induced Akt phosphorylation and Bcl-2 expression and increased Bcl-2/Bax ratio. However, the PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor, LY294002, abrogated the protective effect of Ang1 preconditioning. After transplantation, animals treated with Ang1-preconditioned-MSC had lower death rate, reduced infarct size, and better functional heart recovery compared to those treated with non-preconditioned-MSC. Therefore, Ang1-preconditioning of MSC enhanced in vivo survival and heart function after treatment [162].

In contrast with non-selective approaches, selective strategies aim to stimulate few signal-transduction modulators or single pathways [144]. Selective priming with the small peptide tetrandrine stimulates the NF-κB/COX-2 pathway, thereby augmenting PGE2 secretion and consequently boosting the immunosuppressive effects of MSC over activated macrophages [144]. As well as this, MSC priming with another small molecule, the kinase inhibitor Ro-31-8425, has led to increased homing and anti-inflammatory effects [163].

Considerations and perspectives

Despite great variability of MSC due to different culture protocols and tissue sources, the general immunosuppressive, immunomodulatory, and regenerative potentials of MSC are widely recognized (Fig. 1). However, several complications have limited the success of MSC therapy in clinical trials.

The high sensitivity of MSC to the harsh microenvironment of immune-mediated, inflammatory, and degenerative diseases is still a great obstacle for successful MSC-based therapies. Inhospitable tissue surroundings are able to limit the functions and survival of transplanted MSC. Thus, the use of “empowered” primed MSC may improve their therapeutic efficacy and expand their applications. Many other limitations have also jeopardized MSC-based therapies, such as cell senescence due to in vitro overexpansion, function loss after cryopreservation, and inconsistency of in vivo therapeutic effects among pre-clinical and clinical trials.

This scenario indicates how much new approaches are needed to improve MSC survival, proliferation and migration abilities, multilineage differentiation potential, immunosuppressive, immunomodulatory and regenerative functions, and therapeutic efficacy (Figs. 1 and 2).

In the last years, several priming approaches have been proposed to “empower” the therapeutic efficacy of MSC, with variable results. Noteworthy, MSC from distinct sources present variable responses to specific stimuli (priming factors or agents). In general, the majority of tested priming approaches were able to improve MSC proliferation, differentiation, and/or functions/therapeutic efficacy (Fig. 2).

However, priming approaches of MSC still have many limitations in the clinical translation, such as induction of immunogenicity, high costs, variable effects depending on MSC tissue source and donor variability, and lack of good manufacturing practices (GMP) grade certification for clinical application. Besides, the effect of priming approaches on the long-term tumorigenic potential of MSC has not been yet evaluated.

Further studies are currently needed to evaluate the (i) in vivo effects of different priming approaches; (ii) viability of cryopreserved primed-MSC; (iii) epigenetic modifications generated by specific priming approaches; (iv) efficacy of each priming strategy for different clinical applications; (v) best tissue sources for MSC isolation and best priming approaches for each clinical application; (vi) immunogenicity and tumorigenicity of primed and non-primed MSC; and (vii) proper universal potency assays for quality control of MSC products.

Researchers should also consider that MSC priming methods and agents must allow proper translation for clinical applications. The platform for the production of primed MSC should accomplish the criteria of quality cell therapy standards and allow cell expansion in clinical-grade scale (GMP), at the same time, not compromising the quality attributes of cells and not exceeding reasonable expenses.

Change history

  • 17 May 2019

    The original article [1] contained an error in the presentation of the first author’s name, Nádia de Cássia Noronha. This has now been corrected.









Anthrax toxin receptor 1


Adenomatosis polyposis coli downregulated 1-like


Adenosine receptors


Ankylosing spondylitis


Ascorbic acid 2-phosphate


All-trans retinoic acid


Bcl-2-associated X protein


B-cell lymphoma 2


Brain-derived neurotrophic factor


BCL2-interacting protein 3


Bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2


C-C motif chemokine ligand




Cadherin 1


Type I collagen


C-X-C motif chemokine ligand


C-X-C chemokine receptor










Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2


Fatty acid desaturase 2


Focal adhesion kinase


Fibroblast growth factor


Fibrinogen-like protein 2


Fibronectin 1


Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor


Glucose transporter


78-kDa glucose-regulated protein


Histone H3 at lysine 9


Hepatocyte growth factor


Hypoxia-induced factor-1 alpha


Hexo-kinase 2


Histocompatibility leucocyte antigen


Heme oxygenase 1


Intercellular adhesion molecule-1


Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase




Insulin growth factor


IκB kinase






Interleukin-1 alpha


Interleukin-1 beta




Integrin A


Lactate dehydrogenase


Lactate dehydrogenase A




Matrix metalloproteinase


Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell


Mammalian target of rapamycin



NFκB :

Factor nuclear kappa B


Natural killer group 2 member D


Nitric oxide synthetase 2


Natriuretic peptide receptor 3


Octamer-binding transcription factor 4


Programmed cell death protein-1


Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1


Programmed cell death-1 ligands


Poly(ethylene glycol)


Polyglycolic acid


Prostaglandin E2


Protenogenic growth factor


Protein kinase C


Polylactic acid




Reactive oxygen species




Stromal-derived factor 1




Semaphorin 7A


Soluble human leukocyte antigen-g5


Sex-determining region Y-box 2


Human SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9




Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1


Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3




Transforming growth factor β


Toll-like receptors


Tumor necrosis factor-alpha


TNF receptor-associated factor 6


Tumor necrosis factor-inducible gene 6 protein


Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1


Vascular endothelial cell


Vascular endothelial growth factor


Valproic acid


  1. 1.

    Le Blanc K, Mougiakakos D. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:383–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shi Y, Su J, Roberts AI, Shou P, Rabson AB, Ren G. How mesenchymal stem cells interact with tissue immune responses. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:136–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Klimczak A, Kozlowska U. Mesenchymal stromal cells and tissue-specific progenitor cells: their role in tissue homeostasis. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:4285215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Galipeau J, Krampera M, Barrett J, Dazzi F, Deans RJ, DeBruijn J, Dominici M, Fibbe WE, Gee AP, Gimble JM, et al. International Society for Cellular Therapy perspective on immune functional assays for mesenchymal stromal cells as potency release criterion for advanced phase clinical trials. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:151–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Parekkadan B, Milwid JM. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;12:87–117.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Najar M, Raicevic G, Fayyad-Kazan H, Bron D, Toungouz M, Lagneaux L. Mesenchymal stromal cells and immunomodulation: a gathering of regulatory immune cells. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:160–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Munn DH, Mellor AL. Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase and metabolic control of immune responses. Trends Immunol. 2013;34(3):137–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ankrum JA, Ong JF, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: immune evasive, not immune privileged. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:252–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bianco P, Cao X, Frenette PS, Mao JJ, Robey PG, Simmons PJ, Wang C-Y. The meaning, the sense and the significance: translating the science of mesenchymal stem cells into medicine. Nat Med. 2013;19:35–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mizukami A, Swiech K. Mesenchymal stromal cells: from discovery to manufacturing and commercialization. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:4083921.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhou Y, Tsai TL, Li WJ. Strategies to retain properties of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells ex vivo. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1409:3–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nava MM, Raimondi MT, Pietrabissa R. Controlling self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells via mechanical cues. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:797410.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Huang C, Dai J, Zhang XA. Environmental physical cues determine the lineage specification of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1850;2015:1261–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Baldari S, Di Rocco G, Piccoli M, Pozzobon M, Muraca M, Toietta G. Challenges and strategies for improving the regenerative effects of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18.

  15. 15.

    Petrenko Y, Syková E, Kubinová Š. The therapeutic potential of three-dimensional multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Najar M, Krayem M, Merimi M, Burny A, Meuleman N, Bron D, Raicevic G, Lagneaux L. Insights into inflammatory priming of mesenchymal stromal cells: functional biological impacts. Inflamm Res. 2018.

  17. 17.

    Hu C, Li L. Preconditioning influences mesenchymal stem cell properties in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:1428–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    de Witte SFH, Franquesa M, Baan CC, Hoogduijn MJ. Toward development of iMesenchymal stem cells for immunomodulatory therapy. Front Immunol. 2015;6:648.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang Q, Yang Q, Wang Z, Tong H, Ma L, Zhang Y, Shan F, Meng Y, Yuan Z. Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from fetal-bone marrow, adipose tissue, and Warton’s jelly as sources of cell immunomodulatory therapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12:85–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chinnadurai R, Copland IB, Patel SR, Galipeau J. IDO-independent suppression of T cell effector function by IFN-gamma-licensed human mesenchymal stromal cells. J Immunol. 2014;192:1491–501.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Noone C, Kihm A, English K, O'Dea S, Mahon BP. IFN-gamma stimulated human umbilical-tissue-derived cells potently suppress NK activation and resist NK-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:3003–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Guan Q, Ezzati P, Spicer V, Krokhin O, Wall D, Wilkins JA. Interferon gamma induced compositional changes in human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Clin Proteomics. 2017;14:26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vigo T, Procaccini C, Ferrara G, Baranzini S, Oksenberg JR, Matarese G, Diaspro A, Kerlero de Rosbo N, Uccelli A. IFN-gamma orchestrates mesenchymal stem cell plasticity through the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and 3 and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139:1667–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chinnadurai R, Copland IB, Garcia MA, Petersen CT, Lewis CN, Waller EK, Kirk AD, Galipeau J. Cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells are susceptible to T-cell mediated apoptosis which is partly rescued by IFNgamma licensing. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2429–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chinnadurai R, Rajan D, Ng S, McCullough K, Arafat D, Waller EK, Anderson LJ, Gibson G, Galipeau J. Immune dysfunctionality of replicative senescent mesenchymal stromal cells is corrected by IFNgamma priming. Blood Adv. 2017;1:628–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Duijvestein M, Wildenberg ME, Welling MM, Hennink S, Molendijk I, van Zuylen VL, Bosse T, Vos AC, de Jonge-Muller ES, Roelofs H, et al. Pretreatment with interferon-gamma enhances the therapeutic activity of mesenchymal stromal cells in animal models of colitis. Stem Cells. 2011;29:1549–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Burand AJ, Gramlich OW, Brown AJ, Ankrum JA. Function of cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells with and without interferon-gamma prelicensing is context dependent. Stem Cells. 2017;35:1437–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Galipeau J. Reply: “Function of cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells with and without interferon-gamma prelicensing is context dependent”. Stem Cells. 2017;35:1440–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Prasanna SJ, Gopalakrishnan D, Shankar SR, Vasandan AB. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFNgamma and TNFalpha, influence immune properties of human bone marrow and Wharton jelly mesenchymal stem cells differentially. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9016.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tu Z, Li Q, Bu H, Lin F. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit complement activation by secreting factor H. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1803–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Francois M, Romieu-Mourez R, Li M, Galipeau J. Human MSC suppression correlates with cytokine induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and bystander M2 macrophage differentiation. Mol Ther. 2012;20:187–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Szabo E, Fajka-Boja R, Kriston-Pal E, Hornung A, Makra I, Kudlik G, Uher F, Katona RL, Monostori E, Czibula A. Licensing by inflammatory cytokines abolishes heterogeneity of immunosuppressive function of mesenchymal stem cell population. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24:2171–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rovira Gonzalez YI, Lynch PJ, Thompson EE, Stultz BG, Hursh DA. In vitro cytokine licensing induces persistent permissive chromatin at the Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase promoter. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:1114–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Amati E, Sella S, Perbellini O, Alghisi A, Bernardi M, Chieregato K, Lievore C, Peserico D, Rigno M, Zilio A, et al. Generation of mesenchymal stromal cells from cord blood: evaluation of in vitro quality parameters prior to clinical use. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mojsilovic S, Jaukovic A, Santibanez JF, Bugarski D. Interleukin-17 and its implication in the regulation of differentiation and function of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:470458.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Huang H, Kim HJ, Chang EJ, Lee ZH, Hwang SJ, Kim HM, Lee Y, Kim HH. IL-17 stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: implications for bone remodeling. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1332–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Huang W, La Russa V, Alzoubi A, Schwarzenberger P. Interleukin-17A: a T-cell-derived growth factor for murine and human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1512–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Noh M. Interleukin-17A increases leptin production in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83:661–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shin JH, Shin DW, Noh M. Interleukin-17A inhibits adipocyte differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells and regulates pro-inflammatory responses in adipocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;77:1835–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chang J, Liu F, Lee M, Wu B, Ting K, Zara JN, Soo C, Al Hezaimi K, Zou W, Chen X, et al. NF-kappaB inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by promoting beta-catenin degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:9469–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kondo M, Yamaoka K, Sonomoto K, Fukuyo S, Oshita K, Okada Y, Tanaka Y. IL-17 inhibits chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79463.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mojsilovic S, Krstic A, Ilic V, Okic-Dordevic I, Kocic J, Trivanovic D, Santibanez JF, Jovcic G, Bugarski D. IL-17 and FGF signaling involved in mouse mesenchymal stem cell proliferation. Cell Tissue Res. 2011;346:305–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Han X, Yang Q, Lin L, Xu C, Zheng C, Chen X, Han Y, Li M, Cao W, Cao K, et al. Interleukin-17 enhances immunosuppression by mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:1758–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sivanathan KN, Rojas-Canales D, Grey ST, Gronthos S, Coates PT. Transcriptome profiling of IL-17A preactivated mesenchymal stem cells: a comparative study to unmodified and IFN-gamma modified mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:1025820.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Najar M, Raicevic G, Fayyad-Kazan H, De Bruyn C, Bron D, Toungouz M, Lagneaux L. Immune-related antigens, surface molecules and regulatory factors in human-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: the expression and impact of inflammatory priming. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8:1188–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fayyad-Kazan H, Fayyad-Kazan M, Badran B, Bron D, Lagneaux L, Najar M. Study of the microRNA expression profile of foreskin derived mesenchymal stromal cells following inflammation priming. J Transl Med. 2017;15:10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fayyad-Kazan M, Najar M, Fayyad-Kazan H, Raicevic G, Lagneaux L. Identification and evaluation of new immunoregulatory genes in mesenchymal stromal cells of different origins: comparison of Normal and inflammatory conditions. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2017;23:87–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pourgholaminejad A, Aghdami N, Baharvand H, Moazzeni SM. The effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines on immunophenotype, differentiation capacity and immunomodulatory functions of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine. 2016;85:51–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lin T, Pajarinen J, Nabeshima A, Lu L, Nathan K, Jamsen E, Yao Z, Goodman SB. Preconditioning of murine mesenchymal stem cells synergistically enhanced immunomodulation and osteogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:277.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Croes M, Oner FC, Kruyt MC, Blokhuis TJ, Bastian O, Dhert WJ, Alblas J. Proinflammatory mediators enhance the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells after lineage commitment. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132781.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Carrero R, Cerrada I, Lledó E, Dopazo J, García-García F, Rubio M-P, Trigueros C, Dorronsoro A, Ruiz-Sauri A, Montero JA, Sepúlveda P. IL1β induces mesenchymal stem cells migration and leucocyte chemotaxis through NF-κB. Stem Cell Rev. 2012;8:905–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Fan H, Zhao G, Liu L, Liu F, Gong W, Liu X, Yang L, Wang J, Hou Y. Pre-treatment with IL-1β enhances the efficacy of MSC transplantation in DSS-induced colitis. Cell Mol Immunol. 2012;9:473–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Redondo-Castro E, Cunningham C, Miller J, Martuscelli L, Aoulad-Ali S, Rothwell NJ, Kielty CM, Allan SM, Pinteaux E. Interleukin-1 primes human mesenchymal stem cells towards an anti-inflammatory and pro-trophic phenotype in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li D, Liu Q, Qi L, Dai X, Liu H, Wang Y. Low levels of TGF-beta1 enhance human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell fibronectin production and extend survival time in a rat model of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14:1681–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dubon MJ, Yu J, Choi S, Park KS. Transforming growth factor beta induces bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell migration via noncanonical signals and N-cadherin. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:201–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gorin C, Rochefort GY, Bascetin R, Ying H, Lesieur J, Sadoine J, Beckouche N, Berndt S, Novais A, Lesage M, et al. Priming dental pulp stem cells with fibroblast growth factor-2 increases angiogenesis of implanted tissue-engineered constructs through hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor secretion. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5:392–404.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lavrentieva A, Majore I, Kasper C, Hass R. Effects of hypoxic culture conditions on umbilical cord-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2010;8:18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Betous R, Renoud ML, Hoede C, Gonzalez I, Jones N, Longy M, Sensebe L, Cazaux C, Hoffmann JS. Human adipose-derived stem cells expanded under ambient oxygen concentration accumulate oxidative DNA lesions and experience procarcinogenic DNA replication stress. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6:68–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Haque N, Rahman MT, Abu Kasim NH, Alabsi AM. Hypoxic culture conditions as a solution for mesenchymal stem cell based regenerative therapy. Sci World J. 2013;2013:632972.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fehrer C, Brunauer R, Laschober G, Unterluggauer H, Reitinger S, Kloss F, Gully C, Gassner R, Lepperdinger G. Reduced oxygen tension attenuates differentiation capacity of human mesenchymal stem cells and prolongs their lifespan. Aging Cell. 2007;6:745–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Estrada JC, Albo C, Benguria A, Dopazo A, Lopez-Romero P, Carrera-Quintanar L, Roche E, Clemente EP, Enriquez JA, Bernad A, Samper E. Culture of human mesenchymal stem cells at low oxygen tension improves growth and genetic stability by activating glycolysis. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:743–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Saparov A, Ogay V, Nurgozhin T, Jumabay M, Chen WC. Preconditioning of human mesenchymal stem cells to enhance their regulation of the immune response. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:3924858.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Leroux L, Descamps B, Tojais NF, Seguy B, Oses P, Moreau C, Daret D, Ivanovic Z, Boiron JM, Lamaziere JM, et al. Hypoxia preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells improve vascular and skeletal muscle fiber regeneration after ischemia through a Wnt4-dependent pathway. Mol Ther. 2010;18:1545–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Forrester JS, Makkar RR, Marban E. Long-term outcome of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction: right results, wrong reasons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2270–2 United States.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Bader AM, Klose K, Bieback K, Korinth D, Schneider M, Seifert M, Choi YH, Kurtz A, Falk V, Stamm C. Hypoxic preconditioning increases survival and pro-angiogenic capacity of human cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0138477.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zhilai Z, Biling M, Sujun Q, Chao D, Benchao S, Shuai H, Shun Y, Hui Z. Preconditioning in lowered oxygen enhances the therapeutic potential of human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2016;1642:426–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Mathew SA, Chandravanshi B, Bhonde R. Hypoxia primed placental mesenchymal stem cells for wound healing. Life Sci. 2017;182:85–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lee JH, Yoon YM, Lee SH. Hypoxic preconditioning promotes the bioactivities of mesenchymal stem cells via the HIF-1alpha-GRP78-Akt axis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):1320

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Tomé M, López-Romero P, Albo C, Sepúlveda JC, Fernández-Gutiérrez B, Dopazo A, Bernad A, González MA. miR-335 orchestrates cell proliferation, migration and differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2010;18:985.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Fakhry M, Hamade E, Badran B, Buchet R, Magne D. Molecular mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards osteoblasts. World J Stem Cells. 2013;5:136–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Costa V, Raimondi L, Conigliaro A, Salamanna F, Carina V, De Luca A, Bellavia D, Alessandro R, Fini M, Giavaresi G. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1Alpha may regulate the commitment of mesenchymal stromal cells toward angio-osteogenesis by mirna-675-5P. Cytotherapy. 2017;19:1412–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Gonzalez-King H, Garcia NA, Ontoria-Oviedo I, Ciria M, Montero JA, Sepulveda P. Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha potentiates jagged 1-mediated angiogenesis by mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Stem Cells. 2017;35:1747–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Liu J, Hao H, Huang H, Tong C, Ti D, Dong L, Chen D, Zhao Y, Liu H, Han W, Fu X. Hypoxia regulates the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells through enhanced autophagy. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2015;14:63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lee SG, Joe YA. Autophagy mediates enhancement of proangiogenic activity by hypoxia in mesenchymal stromal/stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;501:941–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Wobma HM, Kanai M, Ma SP, Shih Y, Li HW, Duran-Struuck R, Winchester R, Goeta S, Brown LM, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Dual IFN-γ/hypoxia priming enhances immunosuppression of mesenchymal stromal cells through regulatory proteins and metabolic mechanisms. J Immunol Regen Med. 2018;1:45–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Andreeva ER, Udartseva OO, Zhidkova OV, Buravkov SV, Ezdakova MI, Buravkova LB. IFN-gamma priming of adipose-derived stromal cells at “physiological” hypoxia. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:1535–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Beegle J, Lakatos K, Kalomoiris S, Stewart H, Isseroff RR, Nolta JA, Fierro FA. Hypoxic preconditioning of mesenchymal stromal cells induces metabolic changes, enhances survival, and promotes cell retention in vivo. Stem Cells. 2015;33:1818–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lan YW, Choo KB, Chen CM, Hung TH, Chen YB, Hsieh CH, Kuo HP, Chong KY. Hypoxia-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells attenuate bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Li B, Li C, Zhu M, Zhang Y, Du J, Xu Y, Liu B, Gao F, Liu H, Cai J, Yang Y. Hypoxia-induced mesenchymal stromal cells exhibit an enhanced therapeutic effect on radiation-induced lung injury in mice due to an increased proliferation potential and enhanced antioxidant ability. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;44:1295–310.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lim J, Lee S, Ju H, Kim Y, Heo J, Lee HY, Choi KC, Son J, Oh YM, Kim IG, Shin DM. Valproic acid enforces the priming effect of sphingosine-1 phosphate on human mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Med. 2017;40:739–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Linares GR, Chiu CT, Scheuing L, Leng Y, Liao HM, Maric D, Chuang DM. Preconditioning mesenchymal stem cells with the mood stabilizers lithium and valproic acid enhances therapeutic efficacy in a mouse model of Huntington's disease. Exp Neurol. 2016;281:81–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Xu R, Chen W, Zhang Z, Qiu Y, Wang Y, Zhang B, Lu W. Integrated data analysis identifies potential inducers and pathways during the endothelial differentiation of bone-marrow stromal cells by DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Gene. 2018;657:9–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G, Ahmed M, Aksut B, Alam T, Alam K, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Amado LC, Saliaris AP, Schuleri KH, St John M, Xie JS, Cattaneo S, Durand DJ, Fitton T, Kuang JQ, Stewart G, et al. Cardiac repair with intramyocardial injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:11474–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Nagaya N, Fujii T, Iwase T, Ohgushi H, Itoh T, Uematsu M, Yamagishi M, Mori H, Kangawa K, Kitamura S. Intravenous administration of mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction through angiogenesis and myogenesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H2670–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Mazhari R, Hare JM. Mechanisms of action of mesenchymal stem cells in cardiac repair: potential influences on the cardiac stem cell niche. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4(Suppl 1):S21–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Fujisawa K, Takami T, Okada S, Hara K, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto N, Yamasaki T, Sakaida I. Analysis of metabolomic changes in mesenchymal stem cells on treatment with desferrioxamine as a hypoxia mimetic compared with hypoxic conditions. Stem Cells. 2018.

  88. 88.

    Loganathan A, Linley JE, Rajput I, Hunter M, Lodge JP, Sandle GI. Basolateral potassium (IKCa) channel inhibition prevents increased colonic permeability induced by chemical hypoxia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300:G146–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Rey S, Luo W, Shimoda LA, Semenza GL. Metabolic reprogramming by HIF-1 promotes the survival of bone marrow-derived angiogenic cells in ischemic tissue. Blood. 2011;117:4988–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Khan I, Ali A, Akhter MA, Naeem N, Chotani MA, Mustafa T, Salim A. Preconditioning of mesenchymal stem cells with 2,4-dinitrophenol improves cardiac function in infarcted rats. Life Sci. 2016;162:60–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Liu X-B, Wang J-A, Ji X-Y, Yu SP, Wei L. Preconditioning of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by prolyl hydroxylase inhibition enhances cell survival and angiogenesis in vitro and after transplantation into the ischemic heart of rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Sun Y, Li QF, Yan J, Hu R, Jiang H. Isoflurane preconditioning promotes the survival and migration of bone marrow stromal cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36:1331–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Amoako AO, Pujalte GGA. Osteoarthritis in young, active, and athletic individuals. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;7:27–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Salmon JH, Rat AC, Sellam J, Michel M, Eschard JP, Guillemin F, Jolly D, Fautrel B. Economic impact of lower-limb osteoarthritis worldwide: a systematic review of cost-of-illness studies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24:1500–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Burnstock G. Introductory overview of purinergic signalling. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011;3:896–900.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    D'Alimonte I, Nargi E, Lannutti A, Marchisio M, Pierdomenico L, Costanzo G, Di Iorio P, Ballerini P, Giuliani P, Caciagli F, Ciccarelli R. Adenosine A1 receptor stimulation enhances osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells via WNT signaling. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11:611–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    D'Alimonte I, Mastrangelo F, Giuliani P, Pierdomenico L, Marchisio M, Zuccarini M, Di Iorio P, Quaresima R, Caciagli F, Ciccarelli R. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells: a comparative analysis between human subcutaneous adipose tissue and dental pulp. Stem Cells Dev. 2017;26:843–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Cong XX, Rao XS, Lin JX, Liu XC, Zhang GA, Gao XK, He MY, Shen WL, Fan W, Pioletti D, et al. Activation of AKT-mTOR signaling directs tenogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2018;36:527–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Wang B, Lin Y, Hu Y, Shan W, Liu S, Xu Y, Zhang H, Cai S, Yu X, Cai Z, Huang H. mTOR inhibition improves the immunomodulatory properties of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by inducing COX-2 and PGE2. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:292.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Pourjafar M, Saidijam M, Mansouri K, Ghasemibasir H, Karimi Dermani F, Najafi R. All-trans retinoic acid preconditioning enhances proliferation, angiogenesis and migration of mesenchymal stem cell in vitro and enhances wound repair in vivo. Cell Prolif. 2017;50:e12315 (1-11).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Takeda K, Ning F, Domenico J, Okamoto M, Ashino S, Kim SH, Jeong YY, Shiraishi Y, Terada N, Sutherland ER, Gelfand EW. Activation of p70S6 Kinase-1 in mesenchymal stem cells is essential to lung tissue repair. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018.

  102. 102.

    Li D, Wang P, Li Y, Xie Z, Wang L, Su H, Deng W, Wu Y, Shen H. All-trans retinoic acid improves the effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: an in vitro study. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:484528.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Wu YN, Law JB, He AY, Low HY, Hui JH, Lim CT, Yang Z, Lee EH. Substrate topography determines the fate of chondrogenesis from human mesenchymal stem cells resulting in specific cartilage phenotype formation. Nanomedicine. 2014;10:1507–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Huang Z, Nooeaid P, Kohl B, Roether JA, Schubert DW, Meier C, Boccaccini AR, Godkin O, Ertel W, Arens S, Schulze-Tanzil G. Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in highly porous alginate-foams supplemented with chondroitin sulfate. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;50:160–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Kusuma GD, Carthew J, Lim R, Frith JE. Effect of the microenvironment on mesenchymal stem cell paracrine signaling: opportunities to engineer the therapeutic effect. Stem Cells Dev. 2017;26:617–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Bagno L, Hatzistergos KE, Balkan W, Hare JM. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for cardiovascular disease: progress and challenges. Mol Ther. 2018;26:1610–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Karantalis V, Hare JM. Use of mesenchymal stem cells for therapy of cardiac disease. Circ Res. 2015;116:1413–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Chen W, Zhou H, Weir MD, Tang M, Bao C, Xu HH. Human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell seeding on calcium phosphate cement-chitosan-RGD scaffold for bone repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:915–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Wang L, Rao RR, Stegemann JP. Delivery of mesenchymal stem cells in chitosan/collagen microbeads for orthopedic tissue repair. Cells Tissues Organs. 2013;197:333–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Ahmed TA, Hincke MT. Mesenchymal stem cell-based tissue engineering strategies for repair of articular cartilage. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29:669–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Zeitouni S, Krause U, Clough BH, Halderman H, Falster A, Blalock DT, Chaput CD, Sampson HW, Gregory CA. Human mesenchymal stem cell-derived matrices for enhanced osteoregeneration. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:132ra155.

    Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Li D, Zhou J, Chowdhury F, Cheng J, Wang N, Wang F. Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells. Regen Med. 2011;6:229–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Hanson S, D'Souza RN, Hematti P. Biomaterial-mesenchymal stem cell constructs for immunomodulation in composite tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20:2162–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Zippel N, Schulze M, Tobiasch E. Biomaterials and mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2010;4:1–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Yu J, Du KT, Fang Q, Gu Y, Mihardja SS, Sievers RE, Wu JC, Lee RJ. The use of human mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in RGD modified alginate microspheres in the repair of myocardial infarction in the rat. Biomaterials. 2010;31:7012–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Tan L, Zhao B, Ge FT, Sun DH, Yu T. Shockwaves inhibit chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in association with adenosine and A2B receptors. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14377.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Chen X, Zhang F, He X, Xu Y, Yang Z, Chen L, Zhou S, Yang Y, Zhou Z, Sheng W, Zeng Y. Chondrogenic differentiation of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in type I collagen-hydrogel for cartilage engineering. Injury. 2013;44:540–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Breyner NM, Hell RC, Carvalho LR, Machado CB, Peixoto Filho IN, Valerio P, Pereira MM, Goes AM. Effect of a three-dimensional chitosan porous scaffold on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;191:119–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Meng Q, Man Z, Dai L, Huang H, Zhang X, Hu X, Shao Z, Zhu J, Zhang J, Fu X, et al. A composite scaffold of MSC affinity peptide-modified demineralized bone matrix particles and chitosan hydrogel for cartilage regeneration. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17802.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Zhang ZY, Teoh SH, Hui JH, Fisk NM, Choolani M, Chan JK. The potential of human fetal mesenchymal stem cells for off-the-shelf bone tissue engineering application. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2656–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Marion NW, Mao JJ. Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue engineering. Methods Enzymol. 2006;420:339–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Sun X, Su W, Ma X, Zhang H, Sun Z, Li X. Comparison of the osteogenic capability of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells on collagen, collagen/hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite and biphasic calcium phosphate. Regen Biomater. 2018;5:93–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Hanken H, Alpers J, Bobel M, Woltje M, Hartjen P, Friedrich RE, Jung O, Rendenbach C, Grobe A, Heiland M, et al. Bone substitutes enhance osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional scaffolds. In Vivo. 2014;28:733–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Briggs T, Treiser MD, Holmes PF, Kohn J, Moghe PV, Arinzeh TL. Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on poly(ethylene glycol)-variant biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;91:975–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Niemeyer P, Krause U, Fellenberg J, Kasten P, Seckinger A, Ho AD, Simank HG. Evaluation of mineralized collagen and alpha-tricalcium phosphate as scaffolds for tissue engineering of bone using human mesenchymal stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2004;177:68–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Steinmetz NJ, Aisenbrey EA, Westbrook KK, Qi HJ, Bryant SJ. Mechanical loading regulates human MSC differentiation in a multi-layer hydrogel for osteochondral tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;21:142–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Dvorakova J, Kucera L, Kucera J, Svik K, Foglarova M, Muthny T, Pravda M, Nemcova M, Velebny V, Kubala L. Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a hydrogel system based on an enzymatically crosslinked tyramine derivative of hyaluronan. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:3523–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Rustad KC, Wong VW, Sorkin M, Glotzbach JP, Major MR, Rajadas J, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012;33:80–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Chen S, Shi J, Zhang M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhang L, Tian Z, Yan Y, Li Q, Zhong W, Xing M. Mesenchymal stem cell-laden anti-inflammatory hydrogel enhances diabetic wound healing. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18104.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Ansari S, Chen C, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Yu B, Zadeh HH, Wu BM, Moshaverinia A. Hydrogel elasticity and microarchitecture regulate dental-derived mesenchymal stem cell-host immune system cross-talk. Acta Biomater. 2017;60:181–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Li YM, Schilling T, Benisch P, Zeck S, Meissner-Weigl J, Schneider D, Limbert C, Seufert J, Kassem M, Schutze N, et al. Effects of high glucose on mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363:209–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Tsai TL, Manner PA, Li WJ. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis by glucose through protein kinase C/transforming growth factor signaling. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21:368–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Khan M, Ali F, Mohsin S, Akhtar S, Mehmood A, Choudhery MS, Khan SN, Riazuddin S. Preconditioning diabetic mesenchymal stem cells with myogenic medium increases their ability to repair diabetic heart. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4:58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Frith JE, Thomson B, Genever PG. Dynamic three-dimensional culture methods enhance mesenchymal stem cell properties and increase therapeutic potential. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:735–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Cesarz Z, Tamama K. Spheroid culture of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:9176357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Sart S, Tsai AC, Li Y, Ma T. Three-dimensional aggregates of mesenchymal stem cells: cellular mechanisms, biological properties, and applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20:365–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Bartosh TJ, Ylostalo JH. Preparation of anti-inflammatory mesenchymal stem/precursor cells (MSCs) through sphere formation using hanging-drop culture technique. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2014;28:Unit 2B.6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Hildebrandt C, Buth H, Thielecke H. A scaffold-free in vitro model for osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell. 2011;43:91–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Bartosh TJ, Ylostalo JH, Mohammadipoor A, Bazhanov N, Coble K, Claypool K, Lee RH, Choi H, Prockop DJ. Aggregation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into 3D spheroids enhances their antiinflammatory properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:13724–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Follin B, Juhl M, Cohen S, Perdersen AE, Kastrup J, Ekblond A. Increased paracrine immunomodulatory potential of mesenchymal stromal cells in three-dimensional culture. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2016;22:322–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Cheng NC, Chen SY, Li JR, Young TH. Short-term spheroid formation enhances the regenerative capacity of adipose-derived stem cells by promoting stemness, angiogenesis, and chemotaxis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2:584–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Bhang SH, Lee S, Shin JY, Lee TJ, Kim BS. Transplantation of cord blood mesenchymal stem cells as spheroids enhances vascularization. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:2138–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Yang Z, Concannon J, Ng KS, Seyb K, Mortensen LJ, Ranganath S, Gu F, Levy O, Tong Z, Martyn K, et al. Tetrandrine identified in a small molecule screen to activate mesenchymal stem cells for enhanced immunomodulation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30263.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Waterman RS, Tomchuck SL, Henkle SL, Betancourt AM. A new mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) paradigm: polarization into a pro-inflammatory MSC1 or an immunosuppressive MSC2 phenotype. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10088.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Lee SC, Jeong HJ, Lee SK, Kim SJ. Lipopolysaccharide preconditioning of adipose-derived stem cells improves liver-regenerating activity of the secretome. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Sangiorgi B, De Freitas HT, Schiavinato JL, Leao V, Haddad R, Orellana MD, Faca VM, Ferreira GA, Covas DT, Zago MA, Panepucci RA. DSP30 enhances the immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stromal cells and protects their suppressive potential from lipopolysaccharide effects: a potential role of adenosine. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:846–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Wu Z, Qiu X, Gao B, Lian C, Peng Y, Liang A, Xu C, Gao W, Zhang L, Su P, et al. Melatonin-mediated miR-526b-3p and miR-590-5p upregulation promotes chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Pineal Res. 2018;65:e12483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Gao W, Lin M, Liang A, Zhang L, Chen C, Liang G, Xu C, Peng Y, Huang D, Su P. Melatonin enhances chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Pineal Res. 2014;56:62–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Gao B, Gao W, Wu Z, Zhou T, Qiu X, Wang X, Lian C, Peng Y, Liang A, Qiu J, et al. Melatonin rescued interleukin 1β-impaired chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:162.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Rashed LA, Elattar S, Eltablawy N, Ashour H, Mahmoud LM, El-Esawy Y. Mesenchymal stem cells pretreated with melatonin ameliorate kidney functions in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy. Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;96:564–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Lee SJ, Jung YH, Oh SY, Yun SP, Han HJ. Melatonin enhances the human mesenchymal stem cells motility via melatonin receptor 2 coupling with Gαq in skin wound healing. J Pineal Res. 2014;57:393–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Shuai Y, Liao L, Su X, Yu Y, Shao B, Jing H, Zhang X, Deng Z, Jin Y. Melatonin treatment improves mesenchymal stem cells therapy by preserving stemness during long-term in vitro expansion. Theranostics. 2016;6:1899–917.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Oliveira-Bravo M, Sangiorgi BB, dos Santos Schiavinato JL, Carvalho JL, Covas DT, Panepucci RA, Neves FD, Franco OL, Pereira RW, Saldanha-Araujo F. LL-37 boosts immunosuppressive function of placenta-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7:189.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Kang H, Kim KH, Lim J, Kim YS, Heo J, Choi J, Jeong J, Kim Y, Kim SW, Oh YM, et al. The therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cells primed with sphingosine-1 phosphate on pulmonary artery hypertension. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24:1658–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Popa MA, Mihai MC, Constantin A, Suica V, Tucureanu C, Costache R, Antohe F, Dubey RK, Simionescu M. Dihydrotestosterone induces pro-angiogenic factors and assists homing of MSC into the cardiac tissue. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018;60:1–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Hou J, Zhong T, Guo T, Miao C, Zhou C, Long H, Wu H, Zheng S, Wang L, Wang T. Apelin promotes mesenchymal stem cells survival and vascularization under hypoxic-ischemic condition in vitro involving the upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor. Exp Mol Pathol. 2017;102:203–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Liang D, Han D, Fan W, Zhang R, Qiao H, Fan M, Su T, Ma S, Li X, Chen J, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of apelin on transplanted mesenchymal stem cells in hindlimb ischemic mice via regulation of autophagy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21914.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Kim YS, Kwon JS, Hong MH, Kang WS, Jeong HY, Kang HJ, Jeong M, Ahn Y. Restoration of angiogenic capacity of diabetes-insulted mesenchymal stem cells by oxytocin. BMC Cell Biol. 2013;14:38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Liu J, Zhu P, Song P, Xiong W, Chen H, Peng W, Wang S, Li S, Fu Z, Wang Y, Wang H. Pretreatment of adipose derived stem cells with curcumin facilitates myocardial recovery via antiapoptosis and angiogenesis. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:638153.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Gu Q, Cai Y, Huang C, Shi Q, Yang H. Curcumin increases rat mesenchymal stem cell osteoblast differentiation but inhibits adipocyte differentiation. Pharmacogn Mag. 2012;8:202–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Liu XB, Chen H, Chen HQ, Zhu MF, Hu XY, Wang YP, Jiang Z, Xu YC, Xiang MX, Wang JA. Angiopoietin-1 preconditioning enhances survival and functional recovery of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012;13:616–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Levy O, Mortensen LJ, Boquet G, Tong Z, Perrault C, Benhamou B, Zhang J, Stratton T, Han E, Safaee H, et al. A small-molecule screen for enhanced homing of systemically infused cells. Cell Rep. 2015;10:1261–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Sivanathan KN, Rojas-Canales DM, Hope CM, Krishnan R, Carroll RP, Gronthos S, Grey ST, Coates PT. Interleukin-17A-induced human mesenchymal stem cells are superior modulators of immunological function. Stem Cells. 2015;33:2850–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Sandra Navarro Besciane for the graphic design. We thank Fernanda Teresinha Udinal and Andy Cumming for language review.


This work was supported by the following Brazilian foundations: São Paulo Research Foundation (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP, Centro de Terapia Celular/Center for Cell-Based Therapy, CEPID-FAPESP, Processor No. 2013/08135-2, Brazil); Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Author information




KCRM is the guarantor of this work, i.e., she takes all the responsibility for the integrity of the data. KS and KCRM supervised the study. NCR, AM, CCC, JGC, and JLMR were responsible for the revision of the literature. DTC, KCRM, and KS were responsible for the administrative, technical, or material support. NCR, AM, KS, and KCRM were responsible for the drafting of the manuscript. NCR, AM, CCC, JGC, JLMR, DTC, KS, and KCRM were responsible for the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelen C. R. Malmegrim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional information

The original version of this article has been revised. Author, Nádia de Cássia Noronha's name was corrected.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noronha, N., Mizukami, A., Caliári-Oliveira, C. et al. Priming approaches to improve the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cell Res Ther 10, 131 (2019).

Download citation


  • Mesenchymal stromal cells
  • Priming
  • Cell therapy
  • Pro-inflammatory cytokines
  • Pharmaceutical drugs
  • Biomaterials
  • Culture conditions