Skip to main content

CD26 is a senescence marker associated with reduced immunopotency of human adipose tissue-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells



Human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and tolerogenic effects. Long-term in vitro expansion of MSCs to generate clinical grade products results in the accumulation of senescent-functionally impaired MSCs. Markers to assess the ‘senescent load’ of MSC products are needed.


Early and late passage human adipose tissue (AT) MSCs from pediatric and adult donors were characterized using established senescent markers [i.e., MSC size, granularity, and autofluorescence by flow cytometry; β-galactosidase staining (SA-β-gal); CDKN2A and CDKN1A by qRT-PCR]. In gene set enrichment analysis, DPP4 (also known as adenosine deaminase complexing protein 2 or CD26) was found as a prominent dysregulated transcript that was increased in late passage MSC(AT). This was confirmed in a larger number of MSC samples by PCR, flow cytometry, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence. In vitro immunopotency assays compared the function of CD26high and CD26low MSC(AT). The effect of senolytics on the CD26high subpopulation was evaluated in senescent MSC(AT).


Late passage MSC(AT) had a senescence transcriptome signature. DPP4 was the most differentially enriched gene in senescent MSCs. Late passage senescent MSC(AT) had higher CD26 surface levels and total protein abundance. Moreover, CD26 surface levels were higher in early passage MSC(AT) from adults compared to pediatric donors. CD26 abundance correlated with established senescence markers. CD26high MSC(AT) had reduced immunopotency compared to CD26low MSC(AT). Senolytic treatment induced MSC apoptosis, which decreased the frequencies of CD26high MSC(AT).


DPP4 gene expression and DPP4/CD26 protein abundance are markers of replicative senescence in MSC(AT). Samples enriched in CD26high MSC(AT) have reduced immunopotency and CD26high MSCs are reduced with senolytics.


Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a heterogeneous population of multipotent adult progenitor cells with unique phenotypic features [1]. Functionally, MSCs display broad immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic, and anti-fibrotic effects [2]. This provides a rationale for current clinical trials testing the therapeutic potential of MSCs. MSCs can be derived from several tissue sources, most commonly bone marrow [MSC(M)], adipose tissue [MSC(AT)], and Wharton’s jelly [MSC(WJ)] [3]. A prerequisite for successful MSC-based therapies is a large-scale manufacturing process that preserves the biological potency of the initial MSC population [4]. However, the expansion of MSCs has the intrinsic risk that cells undergo replicative senescence.

Cellular senescence is a physiological state that can be triggered by stressful insults and other processes. It is characterized by a prolonged and generally irreversible cell cycle arrest with secretory features [senescent-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)], macromolecular damage, and altered metabolism [5]. Senescent MSCs are functionally impaired (e.g., decreased immunomodulatory capacity) and can contribute to age-related diseases [6]. Furthermore, a clinical product with high levels of senescent MSCs may have reduced therapeutic effects [7]. Currently, there are no markers with high specificity for senescent MSCs, and clinically validated senescence-biomarkers are not available [8]. The lack of reliable senescence markers limits the ability to determine the ‘senescent load’ in MSC-based products.

The goal of this study was to identify functionally relevant senescent markers in MSC(AT). To accomplish this, we performed gene set enrichment analysis to compare the expression of senescent transcripts in early passage (EP, non-senescent) and late passage (LP, senescent) human MSC(AT). We identified DPP4, which encodes dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (also called CD26 protein), as one of the most differentially expressed genes. The differential expression and surface abundance of CD26 was confirmed in a larger number of early and late passage MSCs as well as in MSCs from pediatric and adult donors. MSCs enriched for CD26 were characterized by reduced immunopotency. Notably, senolytic treatment removed CD26high MSCs.

Material and methods

Study subjects

The McGill University Health Centre Ethics Review Board approved the study and all participants provided written informed consent (10-107GEN). Subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT) was obtained from seven adults undergoing programmed coronary artery bypass graft surgery and seven children undergoing elective orthopedic procedures. Additional file 1: Table S1 depicts the demographic information of the study participants.

MSC(AT) isolation and culture

Human MSCs were isolated from AT as previously described [9, 10]. Briefly, subcutaneous AT samples were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Wisent Inc., St. Bruno, QC) and minced with surgical scissors. The tissue was digested with 0.05% collagenase (Sigma‐Aldrich Corporation, MO, USA) dissolved in Hank’s balanced salt solution (Invitrogen, MA, USA). After 2 h at 37C, the collagenase was neutralized with the addition of fetal bovine serum (FBS), and samples were centrifuged (5 min at 2000 rpm). The pellet was resuspended in complete low glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Wisent Inc., St. Bruno, QC), supplemented with 10% MSC-qualified FBS (certified FBS-MSC, Gibco Invitrogen) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Wisent Inc., St. Bruno, QC). Digested tissue samples were cultured in T75 flasks at 37 °C in 5% CO2 (1 g of tissue/flask), and non-adherent cells were washed off two days following isolation. Isolated MSC(AT) were seeded at a density of 4,000 cells/cm2 in T75 flasks in complete medium and passaged at 80% confluency. Early and late passage MSC(AT) were defined as ≤ 5 and ≥ 15 passages respectively [11, 12].

MSC(AT) characterization

MSC(AT) immunophenotyping was performed with multiparametric flow cytometry analysis [BD Biosciences, LSRFortessa cell analyzer] as previously described [10, 13]. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 9.9.6 (BD Life Sciences, USA). Tri-lineage differentiation of MSC(AT) was tested with the StemPro Adipogenesis, Osteogenesis, Chondrogenesis Differentiation Kit (Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Chondrocyte pellets were mounted, sectioned, and stained with Alcian Blue.

Evaluation of senescence markers

Senescence associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal)

SA-β-gal staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). MSC(AT) were co-stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) for quantification. Images were acquired with a Olympus IX51 microscope, and the ratio of SA-β-galpos/DAPIpos was determined with Image J for > 100 MSCs per sample.

Flow cytometry

Cell size (forward scatter area [FSC-A]), granularity (side scatter area [SSC-A]), autofluorescence (Alexa Fluor 488 channel), and CD26 surface abundance [allophycocyanin (APC)‐conjugated monoclonal anti-CD26 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA)] were assessed by flow cytometry [BD Biosciences, LSRFortessa cell analyzer]. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software version 9.9.6.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

This was performed in MSCs previously characterized for senescence markers. Total RNA was extracted from 100K MSC(AT) with TRIzol (Ambion Life Technologies, CA, USA). RNA was purified with the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research, CA, USA). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized with the QuantiTect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen, Germany), and PCR was conducted with the QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Gene primer sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. Relative expression of Gene of Interest/HPRT was used to compare the mRNA levels in EP- and LP-MSC(AT).

RNA-Seq and analysis


EP- and LP-MSC(AT) from a pediatric and an adult donor were tested. MSC(AT) were preserved in RNAprotect Cell Reagent (Qiagen, Germany) and stored at − 80 °C until RNA isolation. RNA was isolated with the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA library preparation and sequencing were done by the molecular biology platform of the Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM). The RNA was quantified with a Qubit (Invitrogen), and RNA quality was measured on a BioAnalyzer chip (Agilent); the RNA integrity (RIN) was 7 or greater. Ribosomal RNA was depleted for 400 ng of total RNA (Ribocop depletion kit v 3.1; Lexogen), and libraries were prepared with the KAPA RNA hyperprep kit (Roche). Briefly, depleted RNA was reverse transcribed, the resulting cDNA was fragmented (94 °C 8 min), blunt-ended, and indexed adaptors were ligated. Ligated products were then amplified by PCR (9 cycles) and purified on KAPA pure beads (1:1 ratio). The final library had an average size distribution of 344 bp, and libraries were quantified by qPCR. Libraries were then paired-end sequenced (50 bp) on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 (Illumina) with S1 flowcell and an average coverage of 60–80 M fragments per library.


The quality of sequence reads was assessed with the FastQC tool (Babraham Bioinformatics). Trim of low-quality bases and removal of sequencing adapters was done with Trimmomatic v.0.36 [14]. FastQC confirmed the high quality of the trimmed sequence reads, which were then mapped to the human UCSC GRCh38 reference assembly using HISAT2 v2.2.0 with parameters -k 1 to avoid multi-mapped reads,—rna-strandness FR for strand-specific information, and—trim5 6 to trim 6 bases from the 5′ end of each read before alignment [15]. Samtools converted the files from the SAM to BAM format; it also sorted and indexed these files [16]. Gene expression was quantified by counting the number of uniquely mapped reads using featureCounts with the -s parameter to perform strand-specific read counting [17]. Reads mapped to rRNAs were removed to resolve any biases from incomplete ribo-depletion. Genes with a minimum expression level of five counts per million (CPM) reads in at least 2 of the samples were retained. Genes with sex-specific expression (XIST and ChrY genes) were excluded to reduce donor variability. TMM normalization was applied with the edgeR Bioconductor package, and EP- and LP- samples were compared by pairwise differential gene expression analysis [18]. Normalized gene expression (counts per million; cpm) was submitted to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) [19], using a senescence-associated gene set created from published data (Additional file 1: Table S2). Plots were generated with the ggplot2 package.


Western blot analysis (WB)

The preparation of crude MSC(AT) extracts and WB was previously described [20]. The following primary antibodies were used at the dilutions indicated: CD26 (OriGene Technologies Inc., MD, USA; diluted 1:500), β-actin (Chemicon MAB1501; diluted 1: 100,000). HRP-coupled secondary antibodies (Jackson, ImmunoResearch Laboratories, USA) were diluted 1:2,000. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) signals were acquired with a ChemiDoc™ (BioRad), quantified, and normalized to β-actin intensities.

Confocal microscopy

MSC(AT) were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence as described [21]. Images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM780 in the multi-track mode, using a 63Χ oil immersion objective (NA 1.4). Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS4.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

CD26low and CD26high populations were sorted with a BD FACSAria Fusion sorter (BD Biosciences) and collected in 100% FBS (Gibco Invitrogen). Sorted MSC(AT) were cultured in complete medium for 48 h prior to assessing their immunopotency.

Immunopotency assay

The MSC(AT) ability to suppress activated CD4+ T cell proliferation was evaluated in an allogenic co-culture system as previously described [10]. Briefly, FACS-sorted CD26low and CD26high MSC(AT) were grown in 96-well plates (12,500 cells/well) and cultured overnight. Monocyte-depleted peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) stained with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) and activated with Dynabeads™ Human T-Activator CD3/CD28 beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Burlington, ON) were co-cultured for 72 h with the MSC(AT) at a MSC: PBMC ratio of 1:16. PBMCs were labeled with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies (APC-conjugate, # 555349, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and the viability marker 7‐aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) (# 559925, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) and analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of CD4+ T cell proliferation was determined with the Proliferation Platform of FlowJo software (version 9.9.6).

Treatment with senolytics

LP-MSC(AT) were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/well in 6-well plates. Samples were untreated (control), incubated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (vehicle control) or with a senolytic at concentrations previously optimized for MSC(AT). Senolytics were present for 48 h at the following final concentrations: dasatinib (64 μM), navitoclax (20 μM), quercetin (400 μM and 800 μM) or 17-DMAG (25.6 μM and 51.2 μM). Following treatment, MSC(AT) were labeled with CD26, DRAQ7 (cell impermeable DNA stain, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and Annexin V (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software version 8.3.0 (GraphPad, CA, USA). Two-tailed Student’s t-test (WB), paired one-way ANOVA (senolytics treatment), paired Wilcoxon tests [EP- versus LP-MSC(AT) comparisons], unpaired and nonparametric Mann–Whitney test (pediatric versus adult comparisons) were used. Simple linear regressions were used to correlate CD26 surface abundance with other markers of cell senescence. Means ± standard deviation (SD) for all comparisons were reported. Significance was defined as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.


LP-MSC(AT) are senescent

MSC(AT) were characterized according to the minimal criteria of the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT) [1]. EP- and LP-MSC(AT) adhered to plastic, were positive for CD73, CD90 and CD105, and negative for HLA-DR and hematopoietic surface markers (Additional file 1: Fig S1A–B). In addition, all MSC(AT) showed trilineage differentiation capacity (i.e., adipocytes, chondroblasts, and osteoblasts) when exposed to the appropriate growth conditions in vitro (Additional file 1: Fig S1C). Applying these criteria, all MSC(AT) tested in the current study conformed to the ISCT minimal standards.

To further characterize the phenotype of LP-MSC(AT), we evaluated their size (FSC-A), granularity (SSC-A), autofluorescence, SA-β-gal activity, and doubling time (Additional file 1: Fig S2). LP-MSC(AT) were larger, more granular, and with higher autofluorescence than EP-MSC(AT) (Fig. 1A–C). The doubling time and the percentage of SA-β-gal positive cells were also increased for LP-MSC(AT) (Fig. 1D–F). Overall, these data indicate that LP-MSC(AT) display a senescent phenotype.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Late passage MSC(AT) are enriched in senescence markers. A Size (FSC-A), B granularity (SSC-A), C autofluorescence, D doubling time (days), E representative example of β-galactosidase staining (SA-β-Gal), and F summary data for percent of SA-β-Gal in early passage (EP) and late passage (LP) MSC(AT). Graphs AD and F summarize data of 6 adult and 4 pediatric MSC(AT) samples at EP (p4.1 ± 0.6) and LP (p21.0 ± 6.0). Data shown as mean ± SD, comparisons done using paired Wilcoxon test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Scale bars in E represent 200 μm

LP-MSC(AT) have a senescent transcriptome

Next we assessed if LP-MSC(AT) had a senescent transcriptomic profile. We conducted an exploratory RNA-seq on EP- and LP-MSC(AT) from one pediatric and one adult donor. We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using two sets of genes generated based on previous reports (i.e., genes that are (1) upregulated or (2) downregulated during cellular senescence) [22,23,24,25,26] (Additional file 1: Table S2). GSEA confirmed a global senescence signature in the LP-MSC(AT) samples (Fig. 2A). DPP4 (CD26) was among the core enrichment genes (Fig. 2A). EP-MSC(AT) were enriched for genes downregulated in senescence (Fig. 2A). Among the upregulated genes, forkhead box E1 (FOXE1) and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) were previously reported to be higher expressed in senescent human MSCs [22]. FOXE1 is a transcription factor with poorly defined function in senescence, whereas SPP1 encodes osteopontin, a secreted stromal protein involved in tumor growth [27].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Late passage (LP) MSC(AT) have a senescent transcriptome signature. A Gene set enrichment analysis demonstrates increased expression of genes known to be upregulated in senescence (shown in red) and reduced expression of genes downregulated in senescence (shown in blue) in LP-MSC(AT) and shows DPP4 among core enrichment genes; n = 1 pediatric and n = 1 adult, where EP = p6 and LP = p30. BG Relative expression of selected transcripts from RNAseq analysis tested by quantitative RT-PCR over HPRT housekeeping gene in 9 additional samples. Expression of B CDKN2A (p16), C CDKN1A (p21), D DPP4 (CD26), E HES1, F SPP1 and G COL4A1 over the house-keeping gene HPRT. Data presented as mean ± SD, comparisons done with paired Wilcoxon test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

To validate the results of the RNA-seq analysis, we tested the expression of DPP4, FOXE1, SPP1, collagen type IV alpha 1 (COL4A1) and hairy and enhancer of split-1 (HES1) in nine additional EP- and LP-MSC(AT). We included CDKN2A and CDKN1A as prototype genes overexpressed in senescent MSC(AT) and HPRT as a housekeeping gene. We confirmed the overexpression of both CDKN2A (Fig. 2B) and CDKN1A (Fig. 2C) in the LP-MSC(AT). In addition, DPP4 expression was significantly higher in LP-MSC(AT) (Fig. 2D), while HES1 was downregulated at late passage (Fig. 2E). The expression of SPP1 (Fig. 2F) and COL4A1 (Fig. 2G) followed the expected differences but did not reach significance. FOXE1 was not detected in all samples and had high cycle threshold values (Ct), indicating that it is not a suitable senescence marker for MSC(AT) (data not shown). Overall, these results confirm that the LP-MSC(AT) transcriptome have a senescent signature. The data highlight the potential of CD26 transcript abundance to serve as a senescence marker.

CD26 protein levels are elevated in LP-MSC(AT) and MSCs from adult donors

Western blot analysis determined whether the increase of CD26 gene expression leads to changes in protein abundance. Two bands of ~ 110kD and ~ 85kD molecular mass were detected for CD26 (Fig. 3A). The upper band observed in the WB is likely the full length CD26/DPP4 protein, and the lower band likely corresponds to the soluble form of CD26/DPP4. Both bands were present in MSC(AT) from different donors at all passages. However, the abundance of CD26 protein markedly increased when MSCs were cultured to late passage (Fig. 3A). While the same trend was observed for MSCs from pediatric and adult donors, the changes were more pronounced for adult donors.

Fig. 3
figure 3

CD26 surface levels and total protein abundance in MSC(AT) increase with replicative senescence and age. A Western Blot of CD26 protein levels in MSC(AT) extracts from early passage (EP) and late passage (LP) pediatric (n = 2) and adult (n = 3) samples. Data represent mean + SEM, comparisons done with two-tailed Student’s t-test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. B Representative immunohistochemistry image of CD26 protein abundance in EP and LP-MSC(AT). C CD26 geometric mean fluorescence intensity (gMFI) and % CD26high MSCs in EP and LP-MSC(AT) (6 adult and 4 pediatric MSC(AT), at EP = p4.1 ± 0.6 and LP = p21.0 ± 6.0). Data represent mean ± SD, comparisons done with paired Wilcoxon tests, **p < 0.01. D CD26 gMFI and % CD26high MSC(AT) in EP-MSC(AT) from pediatric and adult donors (6 pediatric MSC(AT) at p = 4.7 ± 0.5 and 6 adult MSC(AT) p = 3.8 ± 0.4). Data represent mean ± SD, comparisons done with unpaired Mann–Whitney tests, **p < 0.01

As CD26 resides in the plasma membrane of fibroblasts [28], we located the protein in MSC(AT) by indirect immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy (Fig. 3B, Additional file 1: Fig S3). Consistent with results for Western blotting, fluorescence signals were low at early passage, but profoundly elevated at late passage. High levels of CD26 were detected in the cytosol and at the cell periphery of LP-MSC(AT) (Fig. 3B). The accumulation of CD26 at the cell periphery is consistent with the plasma membrane localization of the protein.

The surface localization and abundance of CD26 was independently confirmed by flow cytometry (Additional file 1: Fig S4). Compared with EP-MSC(AT), in LP-MSC(AT) the CD26 surface staining was increased and the CD26high subpopulation was larger (Fig. 3C). Notably, the levels of CD26 at the MSC(AT) surface positively correlated with cell granularity, SA-β-gal activity and to a lesser extent with autofluorescence (Additional file 1: Fig S5).

Next, we evaluated whether the levels of cell surface CD26 are suitable to discriminate between early passage MSC(AT) from pediatric and adult donors. CD26 surface protein was increased in EP-MSC(AT) from adult compared to pediatric donors (Fig. 3D). In addition, samples from adult donors had a significantly higher percentage of CD26high MSC(AT) (Fig. 3D). Together, these data support the idea that CD26 provides a marker of MSC(AT) replicative senescence. CD26 abundance may also provide a biomarker to distinguish MSCs from donors of different biological age groups.

CD26high MSC(AT) have reduced immunosuppressive capacity

Senescent MSCs have impaired immunomodulatory properties [29]. To evaluate a possible link between immunomodulation and CD26 surface levels, MSC(AT) were FACS sorted into CD26low and CD26high subpopulations (Fig. 4A). MSC:T-cell suppression assays were then performed with each subpopulations. CD26high MSC(AT) were less potent to suppress CD4 T-cell proliferation than CD26low MSC(AT) (Fig. 4B). These results highlight the reduced immunosuppressive functions of senescent CD26high MSC(AT).

Fig. 4
figure 4

CD26high MSC(AT) are less immunosuppressive than CD26low MSC(AT). A Flow cytometry gating strategy for FACS separation of MSC(AT) based on CD26 surface abundance: CD26low and CD26high populations. B Immunopotency assay (i.e., MSC inhibition of proliferating CD4+ T cells). CD3CD28 activated T-cells were co-cultured with either CD26low or CD26high MSC(AT) at a 1:16 MSC:PBMC ratio. n = 4 adult and 1 pediatric MSC(AT). Data represent mean ± SD, comparisons done with paired Wilcoxon tests, *p < 0.05

Senolytics reduce the percentage of CD26high MSC(AT)

Senolytic agents can eliminate senescent cells from mixed cultures or aging organisms [30]. This prompted us to assess the effect of senolytics on the abundance of CD26high MSC(AT). Senescent MSC(AT) were treated with DMSO (vehicle control) or different senolytic compounds at concentrations previously optimized (data not shown). Subsequently, MSC(AT) cell viability and CD26 surface levels were measured by flow cytometry. While DMSO did not induce MSC(AT) death, all senolytics diminished MSC(AT) viability (Fig. 5A). Moreover, navitoclax and high doses of quercetin and 17-DMAG reduced the percentage of CD26high MSCs as well as the surface abundance of the CD26 protein (Fig. 5B–C). These results suggest that senolytic treatment can reduce the number or remove senescent CD26high MSC(AT).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Viability and CD26 surface levels in late passage MSC(AT) decrease following senolytic treatment. A Cell viability of late passage MSC(AT) that were either treated with DMSO (vehicle control) or a senolytic: NAVI: navitoclax (20 μM), QUER: quercetin (+:400 and ++:800 μM) and DMAG: 17-DMAG (+:25.6 and ++:51.2 μM). B CD26 gMFI and C %CD26high MSCs among living MSC(AT). [n = 4 adult and 1 pediatric LP-MSC(AT)]. Data presented as mean ± SD, comparisons done with paired one-way ANOVA, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001


MSCs are ideal candidates for cell therapies; they can be easily isolated from various tissue sources, have sizeable proliferation potential, and potent immunomodulatory and anti-fibrotic properties [2]. However, the extensive in vitro expansion of MSCs needed to obtain clinical grade products leads to the accumulation of senescent dysfunctional MSCs. There is currently no universal feature that identifies a senescent cell. Therefore, simultaneously testing several biomarkers is required to define the senescent state [31]. In this study, we first characterized EP/LP MSC(AT) by determining SA-β-gal activity, the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKN2A, CDKN1A), MSC size, granularity, autofluorescence and doubling time. Furthermore, we interrogated the transcriptome of EP/LP MSC(AT) for senescence markers identifying CD26 as candidate. Our study demonstrated that the increase in CD26 expression and protein abundance correlates with MSC senescence. Importantly, we show that CD26high MSC(AT) have reduced immunopotency compared with CD26low. Cellular senescence is a driver of aging. Therefore, we quantified CD26high MSC(AT) in cultures established from adult and pediatric donors. Consistent with aging-associated changes, the percentage of CD26high MSC(AT) is elevated for adult donors. Finally, we developed protocols to eliminate CD26high MSC(AT) from mixed cultures by treatment with senolytics.

The ubiquitous protease CD26 cleaves amino-terminal dipeptides from various substrates [32, 33]. As such, CD26 regulates critical biological processes related to metabolism, tissue regeneration, and immune responses [34]. CD26 levels are elevated in diabetes and CD26 inhibitors are used as hypoglycemic agents. The beneficial effect of CD26 inhibitors exceeds their effects on metabolism extending to pro-angiogenic and anti-fibrotic effects [34].

Senescent cells accumulate during aging and promote a variety of age-associated diseases [31]. The link between CD26 and senescence was first reported in fibroblasts where DPP4 enhances the growth suppression characteristic of senescence [28]. DPP4 silencing decreased the production of reactive oxygen species in pre-senescent fibroblasts and led to reductions in p53, p21 and p16 and to the increase in SIRT1. Recently, the expression of CD26 in senescent umbilical cord blood MSCs was described [35]. In that study, sorted CD26+ MSC grew slower than CD26 MSC, had increased SA-β-gal, diminished expression of Oct4 and Nanog and were characterized by a SASP. Pharmacologic inhibition or knockdown of CD26 delayed MSCs replicative senescence and, in a mouse model of emphysema, was associated with higher therapeutic efficacy [35]. In the current study we show that early passage adult MSC(AT) have increased CD26 surface abundance and a higher percentage of CD26high cells compared to pediatric MSC(AT). This highlights the biological relevance of CD26 surface protein abundance; it is not only increased during replicative senescence but also during biological aging. It should be noted, however, that CD26 abundance does not increase with age in all cell types (i.e., CD26 is not a universal indicator of cellular senescence). For example, CD26 levels diminish in CD8 T-cells with age, while no age-dependent changes occurred in CD4 T-cells [36]. Collectively, our data emphasize the importance of donor age when selecting MSCs for therapeutic use [37].

Senescent cells often elevate negative regulators of apoptosis, which may confer resistance to apoptosis-inducing signals [31]. Senolytics may target these anti-apoptotic pathways and eliminate senescent cells. To achieve this, we optimized the MSC(AT) treatment with four senolytics (dasatinib, navitoclax, quercetin, and 17-DMAG) that affect different cellular pathways. Navitoclax (Bcl-2 inhibitor), high doses of quercetin (PI3K inhibitor), and 17-DMAG (HSP90 inhibitor) increased MSC(AT) apoptosis and reduced the total CD26 surface abundance in living MSC(AT). This removal of CD26high with senolytics supports the concept that CD26 is a senescence marker in MSC(AT).

A limitation of this study is that we analyzed the transcriptome of only two EP and two LP human MSC(AT) samples. Therefore, our RNA-seq results could serve for hypothesis generation but do not allow concluding on gene expression differences between EP and LP MSC(AT).

Our study is the first to report CD26 as a senescence marker for human MSC(AT). This together with recent findings in umbilical cord MSCs [35], reinforces the relevance of CD26 in MSC senescence. The cell surface location of CD26 led us to develop a new strategy that simultaneously evaluates four MSC(AT) senescence markers. Specifically, a single round of flow cytometry can assess independently cell size, granularity, autofluorescence, and CD26 surface abundance. This approach sets the stage to define in-depth the mechanisms through which MSCs contribute to organismal aging in vivo.


Our results support the model that MSC(AT) increase CD26 transcription and CD26 protein levels when undergoing replicative senescence. The CD26high subpopulation is overrepresented in MSC(AT) from adult donors when compared with pediatric donors. This is functionally relevant, as we demonstrate the loss of immunopotency for CD26high MSC(AT). Furthermore, we have developed an approach to prevent the accumulation of senescent MSCs during culture expansion in vitro. It is based on the controlled treatment of proliferating MSCs with senolytics. Taken together, our findings support CD26 surface abundance as a promising marker to assess the quality of MSC(AT) for clinical applications.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



7‐Aminoactinomycin D




Subcutaneous adipose tissue


Complementary DNA


Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester


Collagen type IV alpha 1




Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium


Dimethyl sulfoxide


Dipeptidyl peptidase 4


Early passage


Fluorescence-activated cell sorting


Fetal bovine serum


Forkhead box E1


Forward scatter area


Geometric mean fluorescence intensity


Gene set enrichment analysis


Hairy and enhancer of split-1


International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy


Late passage


Mesenchymal stromal cells


Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells


Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells


Warton’s jelly mesenchymal stromal cells


Peripheral blood mononuclear cells


Phosphate buffered saline


Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction


RNA sequencing


Rosewell Park Memorial Institute


Senescence-associated beta-galactosidase


Senescence-associated secretory phenotype


Side scatter area


Standard deviation


Secreted phosphoprotein 1


Western blot analysis


  1. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Galipeau J, Sensebe L. Mesenchymal stromal cells: clinical challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(6):824–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Viswanathan S, Ciccocioppo R, Galipeau J, Krampera M, Le Blanc K, Martin I, et al. Consensus International Council for Commonality in Blood Banking Automation-International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy statement on standard nomenclature abbreviations for the tissue of origin of mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy. 2021;23(12):1060–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Phinney DG, Galipeau J, Msc Committee Of The International Society Of C, Gene T. Manufacturing mesenchymal stromal cells for clinical applications: a survey of Good Manufacturing Practices at U.S. academic centers. Cytotherapy. 2019;21(7):782–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorgoulis V, Adams PD, Alimonti A, Bennett DC, Bischof O, Bishop C, et al. Cellular senescence: defining a path forward. Cell. 2019;179(4):813–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kale A, Sharma A, Stolzing A, Desprez PY, Campisi J. Role of immune cells in the removal of deleterious senescent cells. Immun Ageing. 2020;17:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo X, Wang J, Zou W, Wei W, Guan X, Liu J. Exploring microenvironment strategies to delay mesenchymal stem cell senescence. Stem Cells Dev. 2022;31:38–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartmann A, Hartmann C, Secci R, Hermann A, Fuellen G, Walter M. Ranking biomarkers of aging by citation profiling and effort scoring. Front Genet. 2021;12: 686320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernacki SH, Wall ME, Loboa EG. Isolation of human mesenchymal stem cells from bone and adipose tissue. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;86:257–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kizilay Mancini O, Lora M, Shum-Tim D, Nadeau S, Rodier F, Colmegna I. A proinflammatory secretome mediates the impaired immunopotency of human mesenchymal stromal cells in elderly patients with atherosclerosis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(4):1132–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Couto PS, Shatirishvili G, Bersenev A, Verter F. First decade of clinical trials and published studies with mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord tissue. Regen Med. 2019;14(4):309–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikebe C, Suzuki K. Mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative therapy: optimization of cell preparation protocols. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014: 951512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kizilay Mancini O, Lora M, Cuillerier A, Shum-Tim D, Hamdy R, Burelle Y, et al. Mitochondrial oxidative stress reduces the immunopotency of mesenchymal stromal cells in adults with coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2018;122(2):255–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(43):15545–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodiha M, Flamant E, Wang YM, Stochaj U. Defining the short-term effects of pharmacological 5′-AMP activated kinase modulators on mitochondrial polarization, morphology and heterogeneity. PeerJ. 2018;6: e5469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moujaber O, Fishbein F, Omran N, Liang Y, Colmegna I, Presley JF, et al. Cellular senescence is associated with reorganization of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(6):1169–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Medeiros Tavares Marques JC, Cornelio DA, Nogueira Silbiger V, Ducati Luchessi A, de Souza S, Batistuzzo de Medeiros SR. Identification of new genes associated to senescent and tumorigenic phenotypes in mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ren J, Stroncek DF, Zhao Y, Jin P, Castiello L, Civini S, et al. Intra-subject variability in human bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) replicative senescence: molecular changes associated with BMSC senescence. Stem Cell Res. 2013;11(3):1060–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marthandan S, Menzel U, Priebe S, Groth M, Guthke R, Platzer M, et al. Conserved genes and pathways in primary human fibroblast strains undergoing replicative and radiation induced senescence. Biol Res. 2016;49(1):34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coppe JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bertolo A, Guerrero J, Stoyanov J. Autofluorescence-based sorting removes senescent cells from mesenchymal stromal cell cultures. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19084.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kural KC, Tandon N, Skoblov M, Kel-Margoulis OV, Baranova AV. Pathways of aging: comparative analysis of gene signatures in replicative senescence and stress induced premature senescence. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(Suppl 14):1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim KM, Noh JH, Bodogai M, Martindale JL, Yang X, Indig FE, et al. Identification of senescent cell surface targetable protein DPP4. Genes Dev. 2017;31(15):1529–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sepulveda JC, Tome M, Fernandez ME, Delgado M, Campisi J, Bernad A, et al. Cell senescence abrogates the therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells in the lethal endotoxemia model. Stem Cells. 2014;32(7):1865–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thoppil H, Riabowol K. Senolytics: a translational bridge between cellular senescence and organismal aging. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Di Micco R, Krizhanovsky V, Baker D, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(2):75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Klemann C, Wagner L, Stephan M, von Horsten S. Cut to the chase: a review of CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase-4’s (DPP4) entanglement in the immune system. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;185(1):1–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shao S, Xu Q, Yu X, Pan R, Chen Y. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and their potential immune modulatory functions. Pharmacol Ther. 2020;209: 107503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Torrecillas-Baena B, Galvez-Moreno MA, Quesada-Gomez JM, Dorado G, Casado-Diaz A. Influence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) on mesenchymal stem-cell (MSC) biology: implications for regenerative medicine—review. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2022;18(1):56–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim M, Go J, Kwon JH, Jin HJ, Bae YK, Kim EY, et al. CD26 inhibition potentiates the therapeutic effects of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells by delaying cellular senescence. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 803645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Czesnikiewicz-Guzik M, Lee WW, Cui D, Hiruma Y, Lamar DL, Yang ZZ, et al. T cell subset-specific susceptibility to aging. Clin Immunol. 2008;127(1):107–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kizilay Mancini O, Shum-Tim D, Stochaj U, Correa JA, Colmegna I. Age, atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes reduce human mesenchymal stromal cell-mediated T-cell suppression. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr Dominique Shum-Tim for providing MSC(AT) samples, Pavitra Upadhyaya for her assistance with MSC(AT) cultures. We thank José Mauricio Ayala Esparza and HanChen Wang for their assistance with the differential gene expression analysis.


This study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) MOP 125857 to I. Colmegna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RTP contributed to experimental design, collection of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing. US contributed to collection of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing pertaining to the RNA-seq experiments. ML contributed to the experimental design, collection of data, and data analysis and interpretation. PJ contributed to the collection of data, data analysis and interpretation. AB contributed to experimental design of the senolytics experiments and to their analysis and interpretation. US contributed to the conception and design, collection of data, data analysis and interpretation and manuscript writing pertaining to the Western Blot and immunofluorescence experiments. DL contributed to experimental design, data analysis and interpretation of the RNA-seq experiments. IC contributed to the financial support, conception and design, data analysis and interpretation and final manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inés Colmegna.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the McGill University Health Center Ethics Review Board (10-107GEN).

Consent for publication

All participants agreed to the publication of aggregate data without identifiers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Tables (n = 3) and Figures (n = 5).

Additional file 2.

Excel file with RNA-seq data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Psaroudis, R.T., Singh, U., Lora, M. et al. CD26 is a senescence marker associated with reduced immunopotency of human adipose tissue-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 13, 358 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)
  • Adipose tissue (AT)
  • CD26
  • Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4)
  • Senescence
  • Aging