Skip to main content
Download PDF

Low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient hepatocytes differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells allow familial hypercholesterolemia modeling, CRISPR/Cas-mediated genetic correction, and productive hepatitis C virus infection

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 10, Article number: 221 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia type IIA (FH) is due to mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) resulting in elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) in plasma and in premature cardiovascular diseases. As hepatocytes are the only cells capable of metabolizing cholesterol, they are therefore the target cells for cell/gene therapy approaches in the treatment of lipid metabolism disorders. Furthermore, the LDLR has been reported to be involved in hepatitis C virus (HCV) entry into hepatocytes; however, its role in the virus infection cycle is still disputed.

Methods

We generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from a homozygous LDLR-null FH-patient (FH-iPSCs). We constructed a correction cassette bearing LDLR cDNA under the control of human hepatic apolipoprotein A2 promoter that targets the adeno-associated virus integration site AAVS1. We differentiated both FH-iPSCs and corrected FH-iPSCs (corr-FH-iPSCs) into hepatocytes to study statin-mediated regulation of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism. Upon HCV particle inoculation, viral replication and production were quantified in these cells.

Results

We showed that FH-iPSCs displayed the disease phenotype. Using homologous recombination mediated by the CRISPR/Cas9 system, FH-iPSCs were genetically corrected by the targeted integration of a correction cassette at the AAVS1 locus. Both FH-iPSCs and corr-FH-iPSCs were then differentiated into functional polarized hepatocytes using a stepwise differentiation approach (FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps). The correct insertion and expression of the correction cassette resulted in restoration of LDLR expression and function (LDL-c uptake) in corr-FH-iHeps. We next demonstrated that pravastatin treatment increased the expression of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism in both cell models. Moreover, LDLR expression and function were also enhanced in corr-FH-iHeps after pravastatin treatment. Finally, we demonstrated that both FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps were as permissive to viral infection as primary human hepatocytes but that virus production in FH-iHeps was significantly decreased compared to corr-FH-iHeps, suggesting a role of the LDLR in HCV morphogenesis.

Conclusions

Our work provides the first LDLR-null FH cell model and its corrected counterpart to study the regulation of cholesterol metabolism and host determinants of HCV life cycle, and a platform to screen drugs for treating dyslipidemia and HCV infection.

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia type IIA (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder of lipid/cholesterol metabolism due to mutations in the gene encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). This disease is characterized by elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, which lead to severe premature cardiovascular diseases and early death [1]. FH is one of the most common genetic diseases, with a prevalence of 1/500 in its heterozygous form. This number might however be underestimated as recently, direct screening in a general Northern European population diagnosed approximately 1/200 patients with heterozygous FH [2]. Homozygous FH patients (1/106) have very high plasmatic cholesterol levels (> 1000 mg/dL) and LDL-apheresis is the only available treatment to avoid heart failure and death occurring at an early age in absence of treatment [3, 4].

Hepatocytes play a central role in cholesterol and lipid homeostasis as they are the only cells in the organism able to regulate cholesterolemia by secreting cholesterol into the blood via lipoproteins and metabolizing it into bile acids. We and others previously showed that human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) derived from FH patients’ cells displayed impaired LDL-c internalization and that expression of a normal LDLR cDNA by mean of lentiviral or episomal vectors restored LDLR endocytosis. However, none of these iPSCs exhibited a homozygous null LDLR mutation [5,6,7,8,9].

The recent advancement of customized engineered endonucleases has demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas yielded efficient gene targeting in human iPSCs. A number of studies have used CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro and in vivo to explore various aspects of liver biology [10,11,12,13]. The most used safe harbor locus for gene targeting, where transgenes can be stably inserted and expressed from external promoters without showing any signs of genotoxic effects, is the Adeno-Associated Virus Integration Site 1 (AAVS1) locus [14].

The LDLR has been proposed to be one of the host factors participating in hepatitis C virus (HCV) entry into hepatocytes, although the role of this molecule in the virus infection cycle is still controversial [15,16,17]. The most widely used cells to culture HCV (Huh-7 cell line) [18] diverge significantly from differentiated hepatocytes. Primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) support the complete infection cycle including the production of workable titers of progeny virus, but their sources are limited [19]. Hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) derived from iPSCs are permissive to HCV but the previously reported titers of progeny virus were very low, most likely attributable to their immature phenotype compared with PHHs [20].

Here, we report the first models of patient-specific FH-iPSCs with a homozygous null LDLR mutation and corrected counterparts via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted insertion of an LDLR expression cassette at the safe harbor adeno-associated virus integration site (AAVS1). We show that our differentiation process results in metabolically functional and polarized hepatocytes (iHeps). We demonstrate that our correcting LDLR cassette controlled by hepatic specific regulatory sequences of apolipoprotein A2 (APOA2) gene is specifically expressed in corrected hepatocytes (corr-FH-iHeps), restores LDLR function and is upregulated by pravastatin, increasing LDL-c uptake. Finally, we establish that iHeps support robust HCV production of infectious virus particles. In addition, this production was significantly lower in FH-iHeps compared to corr-FH-iHeps, indicating a role of the LDLR in HCV morphogenesis rather than in virus entry.

Methods

Generation of human iPSCs (hiPSCs) from a hypercholesterolemic patient’s fibroblasts

Eight-millimeter skin punch biopsy was obtained from a volunteering hypercholesterolemic (FH) patient homozygous for the g.10891 C>T (c.97C->T, p.Q12X) mutation leading to the absence of LDLR expression. Fibroblasts were derived from the donated tissue using standardized in house protocol and expanded in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 1% non-essential amino acids (NEAA), 1% l-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all from Gibco) and 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA). Cells were passaged in 100 mm culture dishes (Corning, Corning Life Sciences, Dutscher) and were split 1:3 once they reached confluency.

FH-iPSCs were generated, amplified, and cryopreserved at passage 5 by Phenocell SAS (Evry, France) using non-integrative episomes [21] and their standard feeder-free routine.

Culture of human iPSCs

hiPSCs were thawed onto irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) feeder cells (Globalstem) at 3.5 × 105 cells per 6 mm culture dish and cultured in hiPSC medium (DMEM, 20% knockout serum replacement (KOSR) (Gibco), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% NEAA, 1% l-glutamine, 100 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 10 ng/mL FGF2 (PeproTech)) in a 5% CO2 / 5% O2 incubator and medium was changed daily. Cells were then mechanically picked once a week and passaged onto new MEF-coated culture dishes. After 2 or 3 passages, colonies were mechanically picked and transferred onto Geltrex-coated culture dishes (Gibco) and cultured in StemMACS™ iPS-Brew XF medium (Miltenyi Biotec) changed every 2 days. Cells were mechanically passaged onto new Geltrex-coated dishes for further expansion of hiPSCs. To start a differentiation protocol, cells were dissociated into single-cell suspension by Cell Dissociation Buffer (CDB) (0.1 mg/ml EDTA, 0.5 mg/ml BSA in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 1×) for 5 min at 37 °C and were seeded in StemMACS™ iPS-Brew XF (40 000 cells per cm2) supplemented with 10 μM Rock inhibitor onto gelatin-coated plates.

Targeted integration

The insertion, mediated by CRISPR/Cas9, of the “PuroR-normal human LDLR cDNA” expression cassette into AAVS1 locus of hiPSCs, was performed by nucleofection (Amaxa Nucleofector, Lonza) of 3 plasmids respectively harboring the sgRNA AAVS1 targeting sequence (GGGGCCACTAGGGACAGGAT), the spCas9 endonuclease [22] and a donor cassette containing hAPOA2 promoter driving hLDLR cDNA expression cloned into pZDonor-AAVS1 puromycin vector (Sigma-Aldrich). The expression cassette also contains Woodchuck hepatitis virus Posttranslational Regulatory Element (WPRE) sequence to improve protein expression by facilitating mRNA nuclear export. Cells were then seeded and incubated with increasing doses of puromycin (from 0.5 to 2 μg/mL) and resistant clones were isolated and further expanded for analysis and cryopreservation. Correct insertion of the expression cassette by homologous recombination was determined by PCR and Sanger sequencing with primers spanning the 5′ and 3′ homology arms, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 Primers for LDLR Sanger sequencing and targeted insertion used in this study
Full size table

Hepatocyte differentiation of iPSCs

In vitro differentiation of iPSCs into iHeps was performed using previously described protocols with modifications [23]. Briefly, 1 day before the passage of hiPSCs for differentiation, 12-well plates (Corning) were coated with 0.1% porcine gelatin (Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature, then with coating medium (DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone), 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% l-glutamine), and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The following day, feeder-free hiPSCs were seeded as single cells on the coated plates in StemMACS™ iPS-Brew XF medium. Three days after, to initiate the differentiation into definitive endoderm, maintenance medium was replaced by RPMI (Gibco) and B27 serum-free supplement (Life Technologies), 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% l-glutamine and supplemented with 5 μM of CHIR99021 (Miltenyi Biotec) for 1 day followed by treatment with the same medium containing 100 ng/ml of Activin A (CellGenix) and 10 μM of LY294002 (VWR) for 4 days. For hepatic specification, 20 ng/ml FGF2 (CellGenix), 10 ng/ml BMP4 (R&D systems) and 50 ng/ml Activin A were added during 3 days. Then, to obtain hepatoblasts, RPMI without methionine (Gibco) was supplemented with 30 ng/ml FGF4 (R&D systems), 20 ng/ml HGF (Peprotech), 10 ng/ml EGF (Peprotech) for 2 days. At day 10, cells were passaged with CDB and seeded onto 12-well plates coated with 10 μg/mL fibronectin (Sigma) and 30 μg/mL of calf skin collagen type I (Sigma). Cells were then cultured in HPM medium (William’s E/Ham F12 1:1, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% l-glutamine, 10− 5 M linoleic acid-Albumin (Sigma), 5.10− 8 M 3,3′,5-Triiodo-l-thyronine (Sigma), 0.07 IU Insulin (Actrapid® - Vidal), 6.10− 4 M vitamin C (Sigma), 6.10−4 M human apo-transferrin (Sigma), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 0,5 nM selenic acid (Sigma)) supplemented with 20 ng/mL HGF, 10 ng/mL oncostatin M (OSM, Peprotech) and 100 nM of dexamethasone (Sigma) for five days. For final maturation, OSM is removed and 0.5 μM of Compound E (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and 5 μM of SB431542 (Tocris Biosciences) are added. The medium is changed every 2 days.

Dil-LDL uptake

Cells were incubated with 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine-perchlorate (Dil)-LDL (Bioquote Limited) at 2.5 μg/mL for 2 h. Then, cells were washed 3 times with cold PBS 1X, counterstained with DAPI and mounted in Fluoromount medium. Photographs were taken using TCS SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).

For flow cytometry analyses, cells were dissociated for 5 min with Accutase (Fisher), harvested, centrifuged and pellets were suspended in coating medium and analyzed using LSR Fortessa flow cytometer (BD). Dil-LDL signal was collected by a phycoerythrin (PE) detector after transmission through a BP585/15 filter.

Assessment of iHeps functionality

The indocyanin green (ICG) uptake test was assayed by incubating differentiated cells in medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/mL ICG for 60 min at 37 °C. Cells were then washed 3 times with PBS and fresh medium is added. ICG release was evaluated 4 h later.

Oil Red O staining was assayed by incubating fixed cells with 60% isopropanol (Sigma) for 5 min and then with 60% Oil Red O (Sigma). Cells were then washed 5 times with distilled water and counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma) for 2 min before mounting and observed under an EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System (Life Technologies) microscope and treated with ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

PAS staining was assayed by incubating fixed cells with 1% Periodic Acid Solution (Sigma) for 5 min. Cells were then washed 4 times with distilled water, incubated with Schiff’s reagent (Sigma) for 15 min, washed 3 more times and counterstained with hematoxylin for 2 min before mounting and analysis.

Formation of bile canaliculi was assayed by incubating differentiated cells in medium containing 2 μM of DCFA for 30 min. Cells were then washed with cold PBS and DCFA efflux from hepatocytes into canaliculi structures was analyzed by microscopy.

Amounts of albumin secreted into the medium were determined by the human albumin ELISA Quantitation Kit (Bethyl; http://www.bethyl.com) following manufacturer’s instructions. Levels of APOB100 secreted into the medium were quantified by using the total human ApoB ELISA assay from ALerCHEK, as previously described [24].

HCV infection

A high-titer stock of JFH1-HCV [18] was produced in Huh-7.5.1 cells as described previously [19]. This viral stock was used to inoculate iHeps at day 18 of the differentiation protocol in 12-well plates at an MOI of 2 ffu per cell. The culture medium was replaced with the inoculum diluted in the smallest volume of fresh medium sufficient for covering the cells. After a 6-h incubation at 37 °C, the inoculum was removed, and cells were washed 3 times with PBS, then cultured in fresh medium for the indicated times post-inoculation. Where indicated, 500 nM of the HCV polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, or dimethylsufoxide as carrier control, were added to the medium. For the purpose of comparison, PHHs purchased from Biopredic (Rennes, France) were inoculated as described previously [19] with the same virus stock at the same MOI.

Karyotyping analyses

Chromosome analyses were carried out by standard karyotyping on cultured cells, with standard procedures (RHG and GTG banding). For mitotic preparations, cells were cultured in StemMACS™ iPS-Brew XF supplemented with 0.02 mg/ml colchicine (Eurobio) for up to 2 h. The cells were harvested and incubated with a warm hypotonic solution of 0.075 M KCl for 20 min, then cells fixed several times in cold Carnoy’s fixative (methanol/acetic acid, 3:1).

DNA sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using GeneJET Genomic DNA purification kit (ThermoFisher) according manufacturer’s instructions and amplicons of interest (Table 1) were purified using GeneJET Gel extraction kit (Fermentas). For the FH mutation, DNA sequencing was performed by Cochin Institute sequencing platform (Eurofins, France). Chromatograms were treated and analyzed by SeqScanner2 software. For the verification of the good insertion of the therapeutic cassette, 50 ng of genomic DNA was PCR amplified with pairs of primers overlapping either the 5′ junction or the 3′ junction of the AVVS1 locus. PCR program consisted in hot start at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C-10 s/62 °C-20 s/72 °C-45 s and 3 min 72 °C. PCR products were analyzed on a capillary electrophoresis device LabchipGX (5Kchip Caliper Lifesciences) and sequenced from both ends using each primer used for the PCR. Sequences were aligned and compared to the SA-2A-puro-pA donor plasmid for the joining regions of the LDLR cassette (Fig. 2).

RNA extraction, RT-PCR and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total cell RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The amount of isolated RNA was determined using UV-visible Nanodrop Lite (ThermoFisher). For RT-PCR, cDNAs were obtained by Superscript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) and simple PCR assays were performed using Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. For qRT-PCR, cDNAs were reverse transcribed by QuantiTect kit (Qiagen) and processed by real-time PCR over 40 cycles using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR master mix (ThermoFisher) and an ABI-7000 real-time PCR system and ABI 7000 software (Applied Biosystems). Three independent biological triplicates were analyzed. All samples were amplified in triplicates and changes in gene expression were analyzed using the ΔΔCt method by normalizing against RPL13a or TBP, RPLO, and h-PBGD. Primer details are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 RT-PCR and RT-qPCR primers used in this study
Full size table

Immunocytochemistry

Cells were fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde (Euromedex) for 15 min at room temperature, then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 20 min and blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS, 1% BSA and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS, 1% BSA and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI and cells were mounted in Fluoromount medium (Sigma) (See primary and secondary antibodies’ dilutions in Table 3). For membrane proteins staining, fixed cells were blocked in PFS buffer (0,025% saponin (Fisher), 0,02% sodium azide (Sigma), 0.7% fish gelatin (Sigma) in PBS) for 30 min at 37 °C. Primary antibodies were diluted in PFS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Secondary antibodies and DAPI were diluted into PFS and were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and 5 min, respectively. Photographs were captured with a Leica HMR microscope (Leica Microsystems) or EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System (Life Technologies) and treated with ImageJ software (http://iagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Table 3 Primary and secondary antibodies used in this study
Full size table

Flow cytometry

Cells were dissociated with CDB and suspended in PBS, 3% BSA. They were then incubated with conjugated antibodies or with control isotypes for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Cells were then washed with PBS, centrifuged and suspended in PBS, 1% BSA for analysis. Cells were detected with an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD biosciences). Dead cells were excluded from the analysis based on 7-Amino Actinomycin D (7-AAD) staining (Beckman Coulter). FACS antibodies and their dilutions are listed in Table 3.

Western blot analyses

Total proteins were extracted using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton 100X, 1% sodium deoxycholate (all from Sigma) in water) with the addition of protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Thirty micrograms of total protein extracts was electrophoresed on an 8% acrylamide-SDS gel then transferred to a PVDF membrane (GE healthcare). The membrane was then blocked with PBS supplemented with 5% (w/v) dry milk and 0.1% Tween-20, washed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) and then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in PBS-milk-0.1% Tween-20 at 4 °C overnight. After washing in PBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Clarity Western ECL Substrate kit (Biorad) was used for the revelation and pictures were captured using a Fusion Solo Camera and Fusion software. Protein expression was quantified using ImageJ software with β-actin as a control for protein amount. Dilutions of primary and secondary antibodies are described in Table 3.

Virological analyses

All analyses were performed at day 3 post-inoculation except for the assessment of HCV genome replication, which was done at day 1 post-inoculation, i.e., under conditions of a single infection cycle. Indeed, at later time points, multiple rounds of infection are expected to cause a bias in the assessment of viral genome replication per se if the production of viral particles is affected [24].

iHeps at day 18 of the differentiation protocol or PHHs were inoculated with JFH1-HCV at an MOI of 2. To assess HCV genome replication, Cells were lysed at day 1 post-inoculation and intracellular amounts of negative-strand HCV RNA were quantified by a strand-specific qRT-PCR technique described previously [25].

To assess production of total HCV particles, HCV RNA levels in filtered culture supernatants were collected at day 3 post-inoculation and were quantified by qRT-PCR using the m2000sp and m2000rt instruments and RealTime HCV kit (Abbott Diagnostics), a commercial standardized assay used for viral load quantification in clinical practice [26], as previously described [19].

To assess the production of infectious HCV particles, infectious titers in filtered culture supernatants collected at day 3 post-inoculation were determined by focus-formation assay, a classic titration assay based on inoculation of naive Huh-7.5.1 cells followed by detection of foci of infected cells by immunofluorescence, as described previously [19, 27].

Statistics

All experiments were performed with at least 3 biologic replicates. Histograms and summary statistics reflect mean ± standard error of the mean. Unpaired Student’s t test was used for single comparisons. In all cases, statistical significance was denoted by (*) for P ≤ 0.05, by (**) for P ≤ 0.01 and by (***) for P ≤ 0.001.

Results

Patient-specific iPSCs display an FH phenotype in vitro

Clonal iPSC lines from a homozygous FH patient (FH-iPSC) carrying a nonsense mutation at codon 12 were generated by reprogramming skin fibroblasts and displayed hallmarks of pluripotency, stemness and normal karyotype (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Next, we sequenced exon 2 of the LDLR gene that revealed that the c.97C->T LDLR mutation present in the patient’s fibroblasts, resulting in a premature stop codon in the protein sequence (p.Q12X), was also found in FH-iPSCs (Fig. 1a). Accordingly, LDLR protein was not detected by western blot in FH-iPSCs by contrast with normal iPSCs (Fig. 1b) and LDL-cholesterol uptake was impaired in the patient’s fibroblasts and iPSCs compared to their respective controls, as assessed by internalization of a fluorescent LDLR ligand, 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanineperchlorate (Dil-LDL) (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

FH-iPSCs recapitulate FH phenotype in vitro. a DNA sequences depicting the mutated nucleotide g.10891C>T (c.97C->T, p.Q12X) in the LDLR exon 2 in FH-patient’s fibroblasts and iPSCs by contrast to normal human fibroblasts (Ctl). b Western blot analysis confirming the absence of LDLR protein in FH-iPSCs. c Representative confocal pictures of Dil-LDL internalization in ctl and FH-fibroblasts and in ctl and FH-iPSCs. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar 50 μm

Full size image

Genetic correction of LDLR defect by using CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering

We then explored the potential of the CRISPR/Cas9 site-specific nuclease system to target the insertion of a correction cassette into the AAVS1 safe harbor locus. We designed and constructed an expression cassette that harbors the entire wild-type LDLR cDNA under the control of 900 bp of the hepatic-specific apolipoprotein A2 (APOA2) gene regulatory sequences (Fig. 2a). It also contains a splice acceptor site allowing the puromycin resistance cDNA to be correctly spliced and translated when placed under the control of the endogenous promoter of the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 12C (PPP1R12C) gene, located at the AAVS1 locus after targeted insertion. This therapeutic cassette, flanked in 5′ and 3′ by around 500 bp homology arms, as well as plasmids bearing the CRISPR/Cas9 system, were transfected into single-cell iPSCs. iPSCs were then seeded and incubated with increasing doses of puromycin and 34 resistant colonies were cloned. Junction PCR analyses on genomic DNA using primers spanning the 5′ and 3′ homology arms showed that 45% of the puromycin-resistant iPSC clones (15/34) were accurately integrated (Fig. 2b). The puromycin-resistance of the other clones may be due to an incorrect integration of the 3′ arm during the homologous recombination (as clone 48 in Fig. 2b), a bystander effect or an off-target integration of the therapeutic cassette. In addition, an endogenous AAVS1 allele was detected in these 15 clones, indicating a monoallellic integration of the cassette (Fig. 2c). As homologous recombination (HR) usually occurs at a very low frequency, we were not able to screen a clone with an integration of the therapeutic cassette on both alleles of the AAVS1 locus. One of these corrected FH-iPSCs (corr-FH-iPSCs) clones was chosen for further characterization that confirmed stemness, normal karyotype, and absence of any mutation in the inserted LDLR cDNA (data not shown). Furthermore, to confirm that this clone had been subjected to proper HR, we sequenced its 2 homology arms where the homologous recombination occurred and we did not detect any nucleotide insertion or deletion by comparison with human consensus sequence GRCh38 (data not shown). Of note, when we compared these sequences with the plasmid used for HR, we detected a T/A point mutation on the 5′ arm which is present in the plasmid but not in the consensus sequence, suggesting that the HR occurred downstream this position. (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated insertion of LDLR expression cassette at the AAVS1 genomic site. a Design of the LDLR expression cassette in the AAVS1 SA-2A-puro-pA donor plasmid that contains sequences homologous to the sequences flanking the AAVS1 double strand break (DSB) induced by CRISPR/Cas9 (5′ and 3′ Arms). Abbreviations: AAVS1, adeno-associated virus integration site 1, APOA2, apolipoprotein A2; pA, polyadenylation tail; Puro(R), puromycin resistance gene; SA, splice acceptor site; WPRE, woodchuck posttranslational regulatory element. b Junction PCR analyses showing correct integration of the cassette in 15/16 FH-iPSC clones. c PCR analysis corresponding to AAVS1 targeted locus, showing absence of integration of the correcting cassette in one of the alleles

Full size image

Genetic correction rescues FH phenotype

We next used our previously described approach [23] to differentiate diseased, corrected and normal iPSCs into definitive endoderm and hepatoblasts. RNA analyses showed that, in the course of differentiation, cells sequentially expressed stage-specific markers (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Our differentiation process resulted in homogenous populations that expressed high levels of specific markers such as GATA4, FOXA2 or CXCR4 and EPCAM, respectively as shown by immunofluorescence studies. Moreover, as the hepatoblasts are committed bipotent hepatic progenitors, they co-expressed hepatocytic (hepatic nuclear transcription factor, HNF4α) and biliary (cytokeratin 19, CK19) markers (Additional file 4: Figure S4).

Despite significant improvements in protocols for generating hepatocyte-like cells from either hESCs or hiPSCs, generated hepatocytes still exhibit an immature phenotype [28,29,30,31]. Based on recent studies, we therefore refined our differentiation protocol to differentiate our hepatoblasts into more mature hepatocytes (iHeps) [31] (Additional file 3: Figure S3). The morphology of our resulting iHeps closely resembled that of PHHs, with the presence of two nuclei in some cells and most cells positively stained for asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGR), CYP3A4 and albumin. They also expressed molecules used as co-receptors for HCV entry, including scavenger receptor B1 (SRB1) and CD81 (Fig. 3a, Additional file 5: Figure S5). Importantly, iHeps showed signs of epithelial polarity, a fundamental feature required for structural and functional integrity, as shown by membrane immunofluorescence staining for the apical marker tight junction protein ZO-1 and claudin-1 (Fig. 3a). They also expressed punctiform connexin 32 (CX32), the main gap junction protein expressed in normal PHHs [32] and gap junction plaques between adjacent cells were visible by z-stack reconstruction (Fig. 3a). 5(6)-Carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFA) allows to examine biliary efflux through multidrug resistance protein transporter 2, and cell polarity. CDF, DCFA derivative excreted into the bile canaliculi, was visible in the usual top view and z-stack reconstruction, showing the functionality of the bile canaliculi in our differentiated iHeps (Fig. 3b). They also displayed the expression of different apolipoproteins and of three of the major cytochromes P450 (CYP3A4, CYP2A6, and CYP2D6) such as physiological hepatocyte functions including albumin secretion, lipid and glycogen storage as well as uptake of indocyanin green (ICG) and its subsequent excretion (Additional file 6: Figure S6). Collectively, these results suggest that the cells are moving towards a functional mature hepatocyte state, i.e., a differentiation step further compared to previously reported phenotypes [29].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differentiation of FH- and corr-FH-iPSCs into hepatocytes. a Representative pictures of cell morphology and immunostainings of the indicated markers at day 25 of differentiation. Scale bars: 50 μm. b Representative images of DCFA excretion at the biliary poles of corr-FH-iHeps. All images were taken with × 10 objective, z-stacks of xy sections of the cells were acquired with an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Elipse) and analyzed with ImageJ software. Arrowheads indicate bile canaliculi

Full size image

We next looked for the restoration of a functional phenotype in corr-FH-iHeps. LDLR protein was absent in both FH-iPSCs and FH-iHeps as assessed by western blot. On the contrary, it was detected in corr-FH-iHeps but not in corr-FH-iPSCs by contrast with control iPSCs, confirming that the hepatic specificity of the APOA2 promoter was maintained in our model (Fig. 4a). Dil-LDL was detected by flow cytometry in corr-FH-iHeps at a level corresponding to 57% of control iHeps, consistent with a monoallelic insertion of the therapeutic cassette inside the AAVS1 locus (Fig. 4b). As expected, a remaining detection of LDLc was observed in FH-iHeps, due to a passive endocytosis. This other LDL-c-mediated entry is independent of the LDLR and non-saturable, explaining this detection [33].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Phenotypic rescue of corr-FH-iHeps. a Western blot analysis demonstrating the specificity of APOA2 promoter in corr-FH-iHeps. b Representative confocal images of Dil-LDL internalization in FH-iHeps, corr-FH-iHeps and Ctl iHeps. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bars: 100 μm. FACS analysis of internalized Dil-LDL levels: results are expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to Ctl iHeps (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Differentiated iHeps recapitulate the regulation of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism

We then studied the regulation by statins of three genes, sterol response element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2), 3-hydroxy-3-méthyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin/type 9 (PCSK9), which encode major regulators of cholesterol level in hepatocytes that affect LDLR expression level. Statins are routed primarily to the liver where they bind and inhibit HMGCR, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis, resulting in its decrease in hepatocytes. Consequently, expression of the LDLR gene and LDL uptake are enhanced via SREBP2 activation [1] which results in translocation of its active form from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus. There, it binds to regulatory sequences known as sterol regulatory elements (SRE), located in the promoters of SREBP2 target genes, mainly involved in cholesterol regulation, such as LDLR, HMGCR and PCSK9. The latter encodes a protein that is a natural inhibitor of the LDLR by directing it to lysosomes for degradation [34]. In corr-FH-iPSCs, statins are also expected to enhance the transcription of LDLR cDNA, controlled in our cassette by SRE-containing APOA2 regulatory sequences [35].

Addition of 10 μM of pravastatin to differentiated iHeps for 24 h resulted in a significant induction of HMGCR and PCSK9 mRNA in the 3 cell lines (Fig. 5a). As SREBP2 regulation is mostly post-transcriptional [1], the level of its transcript was unchanged after pravastatin treatment. At the protein level, LDLR expression was undetectable in FH-iHeps even with pravastatin treatment. By contrast, it was induced 3- and 2.5-fold in control iHeps and in corr-FH-iHeps, respectively (Fig. 5b). This demonstrates that the APOA2 promoter contained in the therapeutic cassette is functional and can be activated by pravastatin. PCSK9 is synthesized as an inactive zymogen of 72-kDa (proPCSK9) that undergoes intra-molecular autocatalytic cleavage in the endoplasmic reticulum, producing the 60 kDa mature and active form of PCSK9, which is secreted [36]. Both forms were visible and were also induced by pravastatin in both FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps (Fig. 5c). By increasing LDLR expression, pravastatin also increased LDL uptake: 40% in control cells and 20% in corr-FH-iHeps (Fig. 5d). In FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps, SREBP2 was located in extranuclear membranes, whereas in pravastatin-treated cells it was mostly found in the nucleus, consistent with its expected activation and translocation (Fig. 5e). Collectively, our results show that FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps faithfully recapitulate the regulation of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of pravastatin on the regulation of target genes involved in cholesterol metabolism. a Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses of the expression of SREBP2, HMGCR and PCSK9 24 h after induction with 10 μM of pravastatin. Results are expressed relatively to untreated samples as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s test, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. b, c Western blot analyses of the expression of LDLR (b) and PCSK9 (c) in iHeps treated or not with pravastatin for 24 h or 48 h. The LDLR and PCSK9 bands were quantified with the ImageJ software with normalization by signals of β-actin. Results are expressed relatively to untreated samples as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. d Representative confocal images of Dil-LDL internalization in Ctl- and corr-FH-iHeps treated or not with pravastatin for 24 h. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bars: 100 μm. FACS analysis of internalized Dil-LDL levels: results are expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to untreated samples (n = 3). e Immunofluorescence staining for SREBP2 in FH-iHeps and in corr-FH-Heps treated or not with pravastatin for 24 h, showing SREBP2 translocation into the nuclei after pravastatin treatment. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bars: 50 μm

Full size image

iHeps support the complete, productive HCV infection cycle, albeit with differences between FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps

To investigate whether iHeps generated with our differentiation protocol were permissive to HCV infection, we first inoculated control iHeps with JFH1-HCV [18, 24]. We quantified the intracellular levels of negative-strand HCV RNA at day 1 post-inoculation, i.e., under conditions of a single infection cycle, which accurately assess HCV genome replication following virus entry [18, 24]. Not only was this marker detected but its levels were comparably high in iHeps and in PHHs inoculated under identical conditions (Fig. 6a—left panel). The specific HCV polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir significantly reduced the levels of negative-strand HCV RNA, confirming authentic de novo replication (Fig. 6b). We then used a commercial standardized viral load test and an in-house titration assay to assess the production of total and infectious HCV particles, respectively [18, 24]. Although the mean viral load was 1.17 log lower in iHeps compared to PHHs, the infectious titers were not significantly different and consistently reached 104–105 focus-forming units (ffu)/mL (Fig. 6a—middle and right panels). We conclude that iHeps in our system reproduce the complete HCV life cycle including production of high titers of infectious particles.

Fig. 6
figure 6

iHeps support the complete HCV infection cycle at levels comparable to PHHs but viral production is decreased in FH-iHeps. a Comparison of control (Ctl) iHeps to PHHs for HCV genome replication (intracellular levels of negative-strand HCV RNA) and for production of total (viral load) and infectious (infectious titer) virus. b Comparison of Ctl iHeps, FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps for HCV genome replication. Cells were cultured in the presence of 500 nM of the HCV polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir (replication inhibitor) or dimethylsulfoxide as carrier control (DMSO vehicle). c Comparison of Ctl iHeps, FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps for production of total and infectious virus. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4 to 7 experiments). Statistical significance was determined by Student’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

We next compared control LDLR+/+ iHeps, FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps to reassess the role of the LDLR in the HCV infection cycle. We found that negative-strand HCV RNA was present at equivalent levels in control iHeps, FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps (Fig. 6b), suggesting that neither virus entry nor viral genome replication was affected by the absence of LDLR. Interestingly, however, the viral load and the infectious titer were both significantly decreased, albeit not abolished, in FH-iHeps compared to control iHeps, and restored to normal levels in corr-FH-iHeps (Fig. 6c). Collectively, these data reveal a novel role of LDLR in late steps of the HCV infection cycle, i.e., assembly or secretion of progeny virus.

Discussion

Few FH homozygotes with a total loss of receptor function survive past age 30 [1]. We report here the first FH-iPSC and FH-iHep models of a FH patient with homozygous null LDLR mutation leading to a complete absence and functionality of the LDLR protein. As recently reported [29], current protocols to generate hepatocyte-like cells generally use undefined components in the differentiation process. We designed a novel differentiation approach to generate hepatocytes in conditions based on the use of factors and small molecules close to good manufacturing practices mainly to improve the differentiation of hepatoblasts. Our process resulted in metabolically functional hepatocytes with enhanced hepatocyte polarization and canalicular excretion, suggesting a mature feature of stem cell-derived hepatocytes in vitro.

Recently, CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to genetically correct iPSCs with a homozygous 3 bp deletion in the exon 4 of the LDLR sequence leading to a weak expression of the protein [37]. We demonstrate here that the strategy based on the targeted insertion of a correcting cassette into the AAVS1 safe harbor locus via CRISPR/Cas9 can also be used to efficiently restore LDLR phenotype and function. Targeting such a locus rather than the LDLR one will allow correcting FH patients’ specific cell lines with distinct mutations using the same therapeutic cassette, as there are more than 1400 mutations known on the LDLR gene. It could also be adapted to other hepatic diseases as Hemophilia B or Wilson disease just by swapping the cDNA in the therapeutic cassette.

We also chose the AAVS1 locus because gene targeting at this site, using different nucleases, showed robust transgene expression in pluripotent stem cells and differentiated progeny [38]. However, hepatic transgene expression in the AAVS1 context had not yet been established. Indeed, integration into the AAVS1 locus by means of an FLPe recombinase-mediated cassette exchange of various transgenes under the control of AFP enhancer-promoter and A1AT promoter resulted in inhibition of transgene expression in transgenic cell lines. This inhibition exerted by the AAVS1 locus was found both in undifferentiated hESCs and in differentiating hepatocytes [39]. In our construct, 900 bp of specific APOA2 regulatory sequences drive the expression of LDLR, of which upstream regulatory sequences are not yet fully characterized [40]. They were also chosen because they are specifically expressed in hepatocytes in vitro and in vivo after transplantation of autologous hepatocytes transduced with APOA2-GFP lentivectors into cynomolgus macaca livers [41]. Moreover, APOA2 promoter, like LDLR promoter, is regulated by different drugs such as fibrates and statins [35]. We show here that these APOA2 sequences driving expression of the LDLR can be upregulated by pravastatin, statins being the most used drugs to lower cholesterol. Thus, in a clinical context, our correction strategy makes statin treatment accessible to null-LDLR patients to allow greater cholesterol lowering. The AAVS1 locus can also be considered for robust and regulated transgene expression in liver, provided that the promoter driving transgene expression contains adequate regulatory sequences. Our study appears to be the first to report the use of this system for genetic correction of a metabolic liver disease with a regulated expression of correcting sequences, both of which being critical for translating the iPSC technology into novel therapies for curing many monogenic disorders. Concerning FH treatment, it has been estimated that as low as 2–5% of hepatic LDLR activity should be sufficient to render homozygous patients accessible to drug treatment [41]. In this clinical context, quality controls by genome sequencing analyses must be done as CRISPR/Cas9 systems could lead to genomic rearrangements [42].

Dyslipidemia is a central causative factor of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the development of appropriate cell models to study cholesterol homeostasis, as well as the action of statins and other pharmaceuticals, is important for cardiovascular health/disease prevention [43]. To address the pathophysiology of FH, we studied the regulation by pravastatin of three genes encoding proteins that regulate cholesterol level and LDLR expression in hepatocytes. Statins are lipid-lowering drugs decreasing intracellular cholesterol levels by direct inhibition of HMGCR, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. This decrease in intracellular cholesterol level triggers SREBP2 activation that enhances LDLR expression increasing LDL uptake by the hepatocytes [1]. SREBP2 also increased HMGCR expression which is counteracted by the direct inhibition of HMGCR by statins at the protein level [44]. In our three cell models, as expected, PCSK9 and HMGCR but not SREBP2 were upregulated at the transcriptional level by pravastatin, which also enhanced expression of PCSK9 and of LDLR—except in FH-iHeps—upon activation of SREBP2. This overall resulted in an increase in Dil-LDL internalization.

FH-patient-specific iPSCs will also be important tools to create autologous controls to elucidate the functional contribution of LDLR mutations to variations that affect cholesterol metabolism and to assess drugs for hypolipidemic functions, which block enzymes at other stages of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway than statins [44]. Indeed, most drugs that lower serum LDL-c act on the liver through upregulation of LDLR transcription (statins) or stability of the LDLR protein by means of PCSK9 inhibitors, such drugs being ineffective in homozygous patients. The need to identify new drugs for the treatment of homozygous FH has recently been elegantly highlighted in vitro and in vivo [45]. We report here a complete LDLR-deficient iHep in vitro model and its autologous genetically corrected counterpart able to recapitulate cholesterol regulation. Both models, in addition to the control LDLR+/+, will now be useful to screen drugs in order to develop new therapeutics for homozygous FH.

The use of pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes as an HCV culture model has so far been limited by the low titers of infectious virus produced, most likely attributable to their immature phenotype compared with PHHs [20].

Production of infectious virus necessitates high levels of HCV genome replication but involves additional requirements such as components of the VLDL biogenesis pathway thought to be hijacked by HCV for the formation of lipo-viro-particles [17]. Carpentier et al. noted that their iPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells secreted APOB-100 (one molecule of which is present in each VLDL) at lower levels than PHHs and also produced low titers of HCV particles (102 ffu/mL) despite significant levels of HCV replication [20]. By contrast, our iHeps secreted APOB-100-containing lipoproteins (LDLR+/+ iHeps: 2.44+/− 0.26 log μg/dL; PHHs: 2.51+/− 0.14 log μg/dL; P = 0.30) and produced infectious HCV particles at levels that were both similar to those found in our robust HCV culture system in PHHs [19]. The degree of polarization reached by our iHeps might also contribute to infectious virus production, as recently reported [46]. Thus, we have developed a robust iPSC-based HCV culture system. FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps further provide a proof of concept that these models can be used to study the influence of host genetics on HCV infection and to produce genetically modified hepatocytes that could, for instance, be rendered resistant to viral infection in the context of regenerative medicine. The LDLR has been reported to play a role in the HCV infection cycle, although it may be dispensable and redundant with that of SRBI and of the VLDL receptor [15, 16, 47, 48]. Although this role is generally attributed to the hepatocellular attachment of the lipo-viro-particle via its lipoprotein moiety leading to virus entry [15, 47, 48], Albecka et al. demonstrated that the LDLR-mediated internalization of HCV does not necessarily lead to a productive entry and further revealed an indirect role of the LDLR in HCV genome replication per se via its physiological function in the hepatocellular lipid metabolism [16]. However, these conflicting data were obtained using Huh-7 sublines [16, 47, 48]. Our finding that FH-iHeps supported the complete HCV life cycle despite a complete absence of LDLR gene expression confirms that the LDLR is not necessarily required for HCV infection. Nevertheless, the significantly decreased viral load and infectious titer compared to those of both their control and corrected counterparts, despite similar intracellular levels of negative-strand HCV RNA, revealed a novel role of LDLR in late steps of the HCV infection cycle, i.e., assembly or secretion of progeny virus. As the morphogenesis of HCV particles is tightly linked to the lipid metabolism of the producing cell [17, 19], the mechanism underlying the role of LDLR in this process is most likely indirect through the repercussion of lipoprotein uptake on the intracellular lipid content. The availability of FH-iHeps and corr-FH-iHeps provides a valuable model to gain deeper insight into the hepatocellular lipid metabolism and the host requirements for HCV morphogenesis, still the least understood step of the HCV infection cycle.

Conclusion

In summary, we provide an FH-modeling/therapeutic platform for other FH patients, which can be extrapolated to other inherited liver diseases in order to investigate and rescue defective functions. It also lays the foundation for the development and preclinical assessment of cholesterol-lowering drugs and antiviral therapeutics against human hepatotropic pathogens.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AAVS1:

Adeno-associated virus integration site 1

APOA2:

Apolipoprotein A2

APOB-100:

Apolipoprotein B100

Cas:

CRISPR-associated system

CRISPR:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

Dil-LDL:

1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanineperchlorate

FH:

Familial hypercholesterolemia

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

HMGCR:

3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase

iHeps:

iPSC-derived hepatocytes

iPSCs:

Induced pluripotent stem cells

LDL-c:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDLR:

Low-density lipoprotein receptor

PCSK9:

Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin/type 9

PHH:

Primary human hepatocytes

SREBP:

Sterol regulatory element-binding protein

VLDL:

Very-low-density lipoprotein

References

  1. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. The LDL receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(4):431–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(45):3478–90a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lefort B, Saheb S, Bruckert E, Giraud C, Hequet O, Hankard R. Impact of LDL apheresis on aortic root atheroma in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2015;239(1):158–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(32):2146–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cayo MA, Cai J, DeLaForest A, Noto FK, Nagaoka M, Clark BS, et al. JD induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes faithfully recapitulate the pathophysiology of familial hypercholesterolemia. Hepatology. 2012;56(6):2163–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fattahi F, Asgari S, Pournasr B, Seifinejad A, Totonchi M, Taei A, et al. Disease-corrected hepatocyte-like cells from familial hypercholesterolemia-induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol Biotechnol. 2013;54(3):863–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramakrishnan VM, Yang JY, Tien KT, McKinley TR, Bocard BR, Maijub JG, et al. Restoration of physiologically responsive low-density lipoprotein receptor-mediated endocytosis in genetically deficient induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rashid ST, Corbineau S, Hannan N, Marciniak SJ, Miranda E, Alexander G, et al. Modeling inherited metabolic disorders of the liver using human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(9):3127–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghodsizadeh A, Taei A, Totonchi M, Seifinejad A, Gourabi H, Pournasr B, et al. Generation of liver disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells along with efficient differentiation to functional hepatocyte-like cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2010;6(4):622–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pankowicz FP, Jarrett KE, Lagor WR, Bissig KD. CRISPR/Cas9: at the cutting edge of hepatology. Gut. 2017;66(7):1329–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarrett KE, Lee CM, Yeh YH, Hsu RH, Gupta R, Zhang M, et al. Somatic genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 generates and corrects a metabolic disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aravalli RN, Steer CJ. CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics for liver diseases. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(6):4265–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luther DC, Lee YW, Nagaraj H, Scaletti F, Rotello VM. Delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics in vivo: advances and challenges. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2018;15(9):905–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadelain M, Papapetrou EP, Bushman FD. Safe harbours for the integration of new DNA in the human genome. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;12(1):51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Molina S, Castet V, Fournier-Wirth C, Pichard-Garcia L, Avner R, Harats D, et al. The low-density lipoprotein receptor plays a role in the infection of primary human hepatocytes by hepatitis C virus. J Hepatol. 2007;46(3):411–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Albecka A, Belouzard S, Op de Beeck A, Descamps V, Goueslain L, Bertrand-Michel J, et al. Role of low-density lipoprotein receptor in the hepatitis C virus life cycle. Hepatology. 2012;55(4):998–1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Felmlee DJ, Hafirassou ML, Lefevre M, Baumert TF, Schuster C. Hepatitis C virus, cholesterol and lipoproteins--impact for the viral life cycle and pathogenesis of liver disease. Viruses. 2013;5(5):1292–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wakita T, Pietschmann T, Kato T, Date T, Miyamoto M, Zhao Z, et al. Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in tissue culture from a cloned viral genome. Nat Med. 2005;11(7):791–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Podevin P, Carpentier A, Pene V, Aoudjehane L, Carriere M, Zaidi S, et al. Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in primary cultures of human adult hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(4):1355–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carpentier A, Tesfaye A, Chu V, Nimgaonkar I, Zhang F, Lee SB, et al. Engrafted human stem cell-derived hepatocytes establish an infectious HCV murine model. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(11):4953–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Okita K, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Okada A, Morizane A, Okamoto S, et al. A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Nat Methods. 2011;8(5):409–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339(6121):823–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dianat N, Dubois-Pot-Schneider H, Steichen C, Desterke C, Leclerc P, Raveux A, et al. Generation of functional cholangiocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells and HepaRG cells. Hepatology. 2014;60(2):700–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beilstein F, Lemasson M, Pene V, Rainteau D, Demignot S, Rosenberg AR. Lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 1 is downregulated by hepatitis C virus: impact on production of lipo-viro-particles. Gut. 2017;66(12):2160–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Carriere M, Pene V, Breiman A, Conti F, Chouzenoux S, Meurs E, et al. A novel, sensitive, and specific RT-PCR technique for quantitation of hepatitis C virus replication. J Med Virol. 2007;79(2):155–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laperche S, Bouchardeau F, Thibault V, Pozzetto B, Vallet S, Rosenberg AR, et al. Multicenter trials need to use the same assay for hepatitis C virus viral load determination. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(11):3788–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pene V, Hernandez C, Vauloup-Fellous C, Garaud-Aunis J, Rosenberg AR. Sequential processing of hepatitis C virus core protein by host cell signal peptidase and signal peptide peptidase: a reassessment. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16(10):705–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baxter M, Withey S, Harrison S, Segeritz CP, Zhang F, Atkinson-Dell R, et al. Phenotypic and functional analyses show stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells better mimic fetal rather than adult hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2015;62(3):581–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cameron K, Tan R, Schmidt-Heck W, Campos G, Lyall MJ, Wang Y, et al. Recombinant laminins drive the differentiation and self-organization of hESC-derived hepatocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 2015;5(6):1250–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tolosa L, Caron J, Hannoun Z, Antoni M, Lopez S, Burks D, et al. Transplantation of hESC-derived hepatocytes protects mice from liver injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Touboul T, Chen S, To CC, Mora-Castilla S, Sabatini K, Tukey RH, et al. Stage-specific regulation of the WNT/beta-catenin pathway enhances differentiation of hESCs into hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1315–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Qin J, Chang M, Wang S, Liu Z, Zhu W, Wang Y, et al. Connexin 32-mediated cell-cell communication is essential for hepatic differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Spady DK, Turley SD, Dietschy JM. Receptor-independent low density lipoprotein transport in the rat in vivo. Quantitation, characterization, and metabolic consequences. J Clin Invest. 1985;76(3):1113–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Abifadel M, Varret M, Rabes JP, Allard D, Ouguerram K, Devillers M, et al. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat Genet. 2003;34(2):154–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kan HY, Pissios P, Chambaz J, Zannis VI. DNA binding specificity and transactivation properties of SREBP-2 bound to multiple sites on the human apoA-II promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(4):1104–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lagace TA. PCSK9 and LDLR degradation: regulatory mechanisms in circulation and in cells. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014;25(5):387–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Omer L, Hudson EA, Zheng S, Hoying JB, Shan Y, Boyd NL. CRISPR correction of a homozygous low-density lipoprotein receptor mutation in familial hypercholesterolemia induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatol Commun. 2017;1(9):886–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith JR, Maguire S, Davis LA, Alexander M, Yang F, Chandran S, et al. Robust, persistent transgene expression in human embryonic stem cells is achieved with AAVS1-targeted integration. Stem Cells. 2008;26(2):496–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ordovas L, Boon R, Pistoni M, Chen Y, Wolfs E, Guo W, et al. Efficient recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in hPSCs to study the hepatocyte lineage reveals AAVS1 locus-mediated transgene inhibition. Stem Cell Rep. 2015;5(5):918–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. De Castro-Oros I, Pampin S, Bolado-Carrancio A, De Cubas A, Palacios L, Plana N, et al. Functional analysis of LDLR promoter and 5′ UTR mutations in subjects with clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 2011;32(8):868–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dagher I, Nguyen TH, Groyer-Picard MT, Lainas P, Mainot S, Guettier C, et al. Efficient hepatocyte engraftment and long-term transgene expression after reversible portal embolization in nonhuman primates. Hepatology. 2009;49(3):950–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Codner GF, Mianne J, Caulder A, Loeffler J, Fell R, King R, et al. Application of long single-stranded DNA donors in genome editing: generation and validation of mouse mutants. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Latimer J, Batty JA, Neely RD, Kunadian V. PCSK9 inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;42(3):405–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Charlton-Menys V, Durrington PN. Human cholesterol metabolism and therapeutic molecules. Exp Physiol. 2008;93(1):27–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang J, Wang Y, Zhou T, Wong LY, Tian XY, Hong X, et al. Generation of human liver chimeric mice with hepatocytes from familial hypercholesterolemia induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;8(3):605–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Belouzard S, Danneels A, Feneant L, Seron K, Rouille Y, Dubuisson J. Entry and release of hepatitis C virus in polarized human hepatocytes. J Virol. 2017;91(18):e00478–17.

  47. Owen DM, Huang H, Ye J, Gale M Jr. Apolipoprotein E on hepatitis C virion facilitates infection through interaction with low-density lipoprotein receptor. Virology. 2009;394(1):99–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yamamoto S, Fukuhara T, Ono C, Uemura K, Kawachi Y, Shiokawa M, et al. Lipoprotein receptors redundantly participate in entry of hepatitis C virus. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(5):e1005610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

PCSK9 antibodies were kindly provided by Dr. Thomas A. Lagace (Ottawa, Canada). The authors also thank Prof. Gérard Tachdjian and Dr. Lucie Tosca for karyotype analyses and Noushin Dianat, Antonietta Messina and Nassima Benzoubir for helpful discussions. The authors are grateful to Sylvie Goulinet-Mainot and Josep Escrivà for their excellent technical support and to Alexis Moravic for his skillful contribution to virological analyses. They also acknowledge Philippe Leclerc and Denis Clay from imaging and cytometry platforms of UMS33 for their helpful expertise as well as Claire Poiron and Malika Gantier from the GenoCellEdit platform of the SFR Bonamy for providing the tools for genome editing and genome analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by FP7-HEALTH.2011.1.4-2-278152 “InnovaLiv”, ANR-2010-RFCS-004 “Liv-iPS”. J.C. was supported by a scholarship from the MESR (French Ministry for Education and Research), by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT20160435349) and by the DHU Hepatinov. V.P. was supported by a fellowship from the DHU Hepatinov. E.L. was supported by Région Ile de France/DIM Biothérapies and French Society for Hematology (SFH). L.T. was a recipient of a Miguel Servet I Contract (CP16/00097) from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (Plan Estatal de I+D+i 2013–2016 and European Development Regional Fund) of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. T.H.N. and GenoCellEdit platform were supported by ANR-14-CE16-0026 and by the IHU-Cesti project (French government financial support via the investment of the future program ANR-10-IBHU-005 and supports from Nantes Métropole and the Pays de la Loire Region).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Véronique Pène, Laia Tolosa, Tuan Huy Nguyen, Arielle R. Rosenberg, Anne Weber and Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INSERM UMR_S1193, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France; UMR-S1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France; DHU Hepatinov, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France

    Jérôme Caron, Eléanor Luce, Anne Weber & Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt

  2. Université Paris Descartes, EA4474, Paris, France

    Véronique Pène, Maxime Villaret & Arielle R. Rosenberg

  3. Unidad de Hepatología Experimental, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain

    Laia Tolosa & María José Gómez-Lechón

  4. Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie UMR1064, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France

    Angélique Fourrier, Jean-Marie Heslan & Tuan Huy Nguyen

  5. Service d’Endocrinologie Métabolisme, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

    Samir Saheb & Eric Bruckert

  6. AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Virologie, Paris, France

    Arielle R. Rosenberg

  7. CIBERehd, FIS, Barcelona, Spain

    María José Gómez-Lechón

Authors
  1. Jérôme Caron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Véronique Pène
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laia Tolosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maxime Villaret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eléanor Luce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angélique Fourrier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean-Marie Heslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Samir Saheb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Eric Bruckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. María José Gómez-Lechón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tuan Huy Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Arielle R. Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Anne Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JC designed, performed and analyzed the experiments and contributed to the writing of the paper. LT and MJGL performed and analyzed the experiments on hepatocyte functionality. JC, AF, and EL performed genome editing experiments. J-MH performed and analyzed PCR and sequencing experiments. THN performed and analyzed experiments on genomic integrity for gene editing. V P, MV, and ARR performed and analyzed HCV infection data. THN and ARR contributed to the writing of the manuscript. SS and EB provided patient biopsies. AW and ADK led the conception, design, and analysis of the experiments; wrote the manuscript; and provided funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in agreement with the French and European regulations. Appropriate ethical approval and written informed consent were obtained from the FH patient homozygous for the p.Q12X null mutation. No patient’s information is available in the laboratory, apart from his sex and age, personal identification is thus not possible. Ethical approval was obtained from INSERM clinical research committee and legal instances (Comité de protection des personnes and Afssaps).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Characterization of FH-iPSCs. (A) FH-iPSCs display the typical hESC-like morphology cultured on irradiated MEFs. (B) Representative RT-PCR for indicated stem cell markers in FH-iPSCs. (C) Representative FACS analyses for indicated stem cell markers in FH-iPSCs. Black lines indicate isotype control antibody and red lines, positive cell immunostaining. (D) Representative pictures of immunostainings for indicated stem cell markers in FH-iPSCs. Scale bars: 50 μm. (E) Karyotype analysis showed no genetic abnormalities induced by the correction process. (F) FH-iPSCs generated embryoid bodies expressing specific proteins of derivatives from the 3 embryonic germ layers: PAX6 (ectoderm), αSMA (mesoderm) and AFP (endoderm). (TIF 2224 kb)

Additional file 2:

Figure S2. Confirmation of the correct homologous recombination during the insertion of the therapeutic cassette. (A-B) Forward (A) and reverse (B) sequence alignments for the 5′ homology arm between corr-FH-iPSC (lower lane) and the plasmid used for the homologous recombination (upper lane). (C-D) Forward (C) and reverse (D) sequence alignments for the 3′ homology arm between corr-FH-iPSC (lower lane) and the plasmid used for the homologous recombination (upper lane) . (TIF 3705 kb)

Additional file 3:

Figure S3. Expression of specific stage-markers during the differentiation process. (A) Schematic outline of the developed protocol. (B) Representative RT-PCR analyses at day 0 (hiPSCs), 5 (DE), 10 (hepatoblasts), 18 (pre-hepatocytes) and 25 (iHeps) for expression of stem cells and hepatocytic markers in FH-, corr-FH- and control (Ctl) cells. hESCs were used as positive control for OCT4 and NANOG, and human liver for all others. (TIF 3833 kb)

Additional file 4:

Figure S4. Differentiation of control, FH- and corr-FH-iPSCs towards definitive endoderm and hepatoblasts. (A) Representative pictures of cell morphology, immunostainings and FACS analyses of the definitive endoderm (DE) markers GATA4, FOXA2 and CXCR4 in cells derived from FH-, corr-FH- and control (Ctl) iPSCs at day 5 of differentiation. Scale bars: 50 μm. (B) Representative pictures of cell morphology, immunostainings and FACS analyses of hepatoblast markers HNF4α, CK19 and EPCAM in cells derived from FH-, corr-FH- and control (Ctl) iPSCs at day 10 of differentiation. Scale bars: 50 μm. (TIF 727 kb)

Additional file 5:

Figure S5. Differentiation of control (Ctl) iPSCs into hepatocytes. Representative pictures of cell morphology and immunostainings of the indicated markers at day 25 of differentiation. Scale bars: 50 μm. (TIF 4482 kb)

Additional file 6:

Figure S6. Functionality of differentiated iHeps. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of APOA1, APOB, APOC3 and APOE at day 25 of differentiation in control (Ctl) iHeps, corr-FH-iHeps and FH-iHeps. Data are represented as the percentage of expression in HepG2 hepatocytic cell line. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of 3 major CYPs, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP2A6 at day 25 of differentiation in Ctl iHeps, corr-FH-iHeps and FH-iHeps. Data are represented as the percentage of expression in HepG2 hepatocytic cell line. (C) Albumin secretion by Ctl, FH- and corr-FH-iHeps was determined by ELISA test. (D) Oil red staining shows the ability of cells to store lipids. Scale bars: 200 μm. (E) Periodic Acid Schiff staining shows the ability of cells to store glycogen. Scale bars: 200 μm (F) Uptake and excretion of Indocyanin Green (ICG). After 1 h of incubation, the uptake of ICG was visible in a high percentage of FH- and corr-FH-iHeps. Most of these cells had excreted ICG as early as 4 h after its withdrawal from the medium. Scale bars: 200 μm. (TIF 2044 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caron, J., Pène, V., Tolosa, L. et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient hepatocytes differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells allow familial hypercholesterolemia modeling, CRISPR/Cas-mediated genetic correction, and productive hepatitis C virus infection. Stem Cell Res Ther 10, 221 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1342-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1342-6

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512