Skip to main content
Download PDF

Meniscus repair: up-to-date advances in stem cell-based therapy

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 13, Article number: 207 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

The meniscus is a semilunar fibrocartilage between the tibia and femur that is essential for the structural and functional integrity of the keen joint. In addition to pain and knee joint dysfunction, meniscus injuries can also lead to degenerative changes of the knee joint such as osteoarthritis, which further affect patient productivity and quality of life. However, with intrinsic avascular property, the tearing meniscus tends to be nonunion and the augmentation of post-injury meniscus repair has long time been a challenge. Stem cell-based therapy with potent regenerative properties has recently attracted much attention in repairing meniscus injuries, among which mesenchymal stem cells were most explored for their easy availability, trilineage differentiation potential, and immunomodulatory properties. Here, we summarize the advances and achievements in stem cell-based therapy for meniscus repair in the last 5 years. We also highlight the obstacles before their successful clinical translation and propose some perspectives for stem cell-based therapy in meniscus repair.

Introduction

The meniscus is a crescent-shaped fibrocartilage on the tibia articular surface. Normal meniscus deepens the depression of the tibial condyle and cushions the femur condyle, so as to enhance joint stability, facilitate joint lubrication, and maintain joint function [1,2,3,4,5]. As an essential component for the integrality of the knee joint, the meniscus bears a poor self-healing ability for its intrinsic avascular characteristics [1, 6,7,8]. Only the marginal 10–30% meniscus receives blood supply from the synovial membrane directly and can be healed after injuries, while the central meniscus nourished by the penetration of joint fluid lacks self-healing ability [7,8,9,10].

The annual incidence of meniscus injuries reaches 66–70 per 100,000 people, mainly caused by trauma and degenerative diseases [11,12,13,14,15]. Meniscus injuries lead to multiple clinical symptoms including joint pain, swelling, and locking. It’s estimated 50% of patients with persistent meniscus or anterior cruciate ligament tear will develop osteoarthritis or other articular cartilage degenerative diseases within 10–20 years [16] and the incidence of osteoarthritis will increase up to sevenfold for patients who went through meniscectomy [17]. Thus, meniscus injuries and related degenerative diseases propose a substantial burden to the healthcare system.

Various surgical therapies were applied to treat meniscus injuries including meniscectomy, allogeneic meniscus transplantation, and artificial meniscus implantation [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, these therapies all bear some drawbacks. For instance, meniscectomy was reported to predispose the knee joint toward osteoarthritis and other degenerative changes [1, 14, 17]. The application of allogeneic meniscus was restricted by limited tissue availability, disease transmission risk, and mismatch between the graft and the host [21, 25, 26]. Concerning artificial meniscus, although the preliminary published data were promising, its long-term therapeutic effect is conflicting [27, 28]. Since no operative therapy for meniscus injury achieved satisfactory outcome currently, attentions were altered to alternative conservative strategies, among which stem cell-based therapy that possesses potent regenerative properties and can promote the natural healing process of the meniscus attracted a lot of interest [29,30,31,32,33].

As a regenerative strategy, stem cell-based therapy has achieved great advances in treating musculoskeletal diseases, such as bone and cartilage defects, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and intervertebral disk degeneration disease [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. For meniscus injuries that need reconstruct neo-cartilage, fibrous, and vascularity, stem cells with multidirectional differentiation potentials also hold advantages [30, 32]. Besides, stem cells can not only directly differentiate into meniscus cells but also serve as bioactive factors mediators. Among a variety of sources, mesenchymal stem cells were most explored in treating meniscus injuries for their availability, chemotaxis, and immunomodulatory ability [41,42,43,44]. In this review, we summarize and evaluate the works promoting the application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in repairing meniscus injuries in the last 5 years. We also highlight the current challenges and unsolved problems before their successful clinical translation. Finally, the prospective and future development of stem cell-based therapy for meniscus injury are also discussed.

Anatomy and function of the meniscus

The meniscus consists of two crescent-shaped fibrocartilage disks named medial meniscus and lateral meniscus, which are anchored at the anterior and posterior aspects of the tibial plateau. The edge of the meniscus is relatively thick and closely connected with the joint capsule, while the center of the meniscus is thin and in a mobile state [45,46,47] (Fig. 1A). The joint capsule-derived vessels and nerves infiltrate the peripheral 10–30% of the meniscus, which was called the “red zone” and can be healed after injury [7]. In contrast, the “white zone” refers to the central two-thirds meniscus with no vessels supply or nerves innervation and bears poor intrinsic healing capability [48,49,50]. The area between the “red zone” and the “white zone” was called the “red-white zone” and displays a transitional self-healing property [7, 50] (Fig. 1B). The cell composition of the meniscus includes fibrochondrocytes and fibroblast-like cells in the peripheral meniscus and chondrocyte-like cells in the middle meniscus [51,52,53,54]. There are also amounts of fusiform cells on the superficial layer of the meniscus, which are considered regenerative progenitor cells that play an important role in meniscus repairing [53, 55].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Copyright 2002, Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. B Frontal section of the medial compartment of the knee following perfusion with India ink. Vascular red-red zone, avascular white-white zone, and in-between red-white zones are labeled [7]. Reproduced with permission [7]. Copyright 1982, SAGE Publications

A Anatomy of the meniscus viewed from above [66]. Reproduced with permission [66].

Full size image

The main components of the meniscus are water, collagen, and proteoglycans [56]. Collagen and proteoglycan endow the meniscus with anti-tensile, compressive, and shear stress functions [57]. The unique biochemical composition and structure dictate the meniscus to convert the vertical load into circumferential hoop stresses and transfer the stresses to the cartilage that possesses a larger surface area, thereby cushioning shock, stabilizing knee joint, and eventually avoiding knee joint injury [58,59,60,61,62]. Furthermore, some studies theorized that the meniscus also accounts for the proprioception and lubrication of the knee joint [63,64,65].

Mesenchymal stem cell sources

MSCs derived from bone marrow, synovium, meniscus, and adipose tissue are employed in promoting meniscus regeneration and reconstructing normal meniscus structure [31, 32]. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are the most frequently used stem cells in regenerative medicine, which can be obtained from the bone marrow of non-weight-bearing bones and possess a strong trilineage differentiation potential [67,68,69,70]. Amounts of studies have shown that the transplanted BMSCs can both differentiate into meniscus-like fibrocartilage tissue and enhance the production of extracellular matrix (ECM), thus promoting the integration of regenerated meniscus tissue with the host tissues [71,72,73,74]. However, the disadvantages of BMSCs include the painful process of obtaining (bone marrow puncture) and discrepant gene expression profiles with meniscus cells [75]. The number of synovium mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs) in human synovial fluid was reported to increase after meniscus injury regulated by both calcitonin gene-related peptide and hepatocyte growth factor, indicating SMSCs play an important role in repairing meniscus [76]. Although less in quantity, SMSCs possess a potent chondrogenic potential and have an equivalent or better efficacy in repairing meniscus compared with BMSCs [77,78,79,80,81]. Notably, hierarchical clustering analysis showed that the gene expression profile of meniscus cells is more similar to SMSCs than BMSCs, suggesting a promising perspective of SMSCs in repairing the meniscus [75, 82]. Meniscus-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MMSCs) can be separated from the removed meniscus tissue in arthroscopic surgery or meniscectomy. MMSCs also have trilineage differentiation ability and express stem cell-specific markers [83, 84]. A recent study identified CD146+ meniscus cells as the progenitor cells in the meniscus [85]. Gene expression profiling similarity between MMSCs and meniscus-derived chondrocytes is higher than that of MSCs derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow [86]. Some studies also suggest that MMSCs are more inclined to differentiate toward the chondrogenic direction, while BMSCs are more inclined to differentiate toward the osteogenic direction [83]. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) becomes more and more popular in recent years regarding their accessibility and abundance compared to other MSCs [87]. Although ADSCs were reported to be inferior to BMSCs and SMSCs in terms of chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential [80], amounts of advances have been achieved in both preclinical and clinical studies using ADSCs to treat meniscus injuries.

In summary, MSCs have been widely proved to propose promising therapeutic effects in meniscus repair. The transplanted MSCs can not only directly differentiate into meniscus cells but also can serve as bioactive factors mediators to build a regenerative microenvironment, which significantly facilitates meniscus repair [29, 88]. Each source of MSCs possesses intrinsic merits and demerits and different differentiation potentials and there is no consensus regarding the best source [30]. It’s currently believed that the gene expression profiles of MSCs from intra-articular tissues (such as synovium, meniscus, ligament) are more similar to meniscus cells compared with MSCs from extra-articular tissues (such as muscle, adipose tissue, bone marrow) [86] and are more suitable for meniscus repair.

Preclinical advances in scaffold-free stem cell therapy

Stem cell-based therapies without tissue engineering scaffolds directly implant MSCs to the injured meniscus and have achieved encouraging outcomes in several preclinical studies in the last 5 years (Table 1). The traditional scaffold-free approach often needs to harvest, isolate, and culture MSCs to achieve a suitable number and state of cells before injection. To avoid the complicated procedures, Koch et al. [89] invented a one-step stem cell-based therapy, in which bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) containing BMSCs was harvested and transplanted to the meniscus lesion to induce tissue regeneration in rabbits. Enhanced meniscus tissue regeneration in a time-dependent manner was observed in the BMAC group compared with the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and control groups. Articular cartilage chondroprogenitor cells (C-PCs) have recently been identified as a favorable stem cell source for meniscus repair for their potent chondrogenic potential [90,91,92]. For example, Jayasuriya et al. [91] isolated C-PCs from healthy human cartilage and investigated their trilineage differentiation capability and meniscus tear repairing potential (Fig. 2). It tuned out the C-PCs express specific mesenchymal stem cell markers and tend to differentiate toward chondrogenic linage rather than adipogenic and osteogenic linage. The C-PCs possess similar chemotaxis with BMSCs and can migrate to the torn area of the meniscus under the stimulation of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), which was proved to be mediated by the SDF-1/CXCR4 pathway. Apart from chondrogenic tendency and spatial chemotaxis, C-PCs express reduced cellular hypertrophy marker collagen X compared with BMSC, representing a more suitable cell source in repairing meniscus tear. ADSCs are another MSCs that attracting more and more attention in meniscus repair for their easy availability. In a preclinical study conducted by Toratani et al. [93], a 3D scaffold-free allogenic ADSCs were implanted into a 1.5-mm defect in the white area of the meniscus. Favorable cell proliferation and adhesion as well as enhanced histological meniscus healing were observed in partial meniscectomy rabbits. Ozeki et al. [94] built a novel meniscus injury model in minipig (the posterior medial meniscus of minipigs was punctuated 200 times using a 23G needle) and evaluated the therapeutic effects of SMSCs transplantation. Histological results showed the proteoglycan content was significantly increased in the SMSCs group compared with the control group 8 weeks after treatment. A closer T2 value with native meniscus tissue was also observed in the MRI images of the SMSCs group. Apart from MSCs source, animal species is another important factor that decides the anatomy properties and biological responses for transplanted stem cells, so employing primates in experiments before clinical translation is of great value. Thus, Kondo et al. [95] conducted a preclinical study involving primates, in which aggregates of autologous SMSCs were transplanted to investigate whether the cells can promote meniscus regeneration in aged cynomolgus. After 16 weeks of treatment, the defected meniscus was proved to recover better in the cell-transplanted group, as investigated by histological and MRI T1rho images, demonstrating the promising value of SMSCs in human meniscus repair.

Table 1 Preclinical advances in scaffold-free stem cell therapy in the last 5 years
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Copyright 2018, Jayasuriya et al.

Establishment of healthy human articular cartilage-derived progenitor cell lines [91]. Illustrated diagram of procedure used to establish human cartilage progenitor cell lines. Healthy human cartilage was diced into small pieces and digested using pronase and collagenase. Released cells were washed and strained to remove clumps. Cells were seeded at low density and individual single-cell-derived colonies were separated and stabilized using SV-40 mediated delivery of large-T antigen. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC license [91].

Full size image

Preclinical advances in scaffold-based stem cell therapy

The advances in tissue engineering that involved amounts of biomaterials-based natural and synthetic scaffolds have significantly contributed to meniscus repair [96,97,98]. Scaffolds were designed to possess different compositions and microstructures to induce the adhesion, proliferation, and directional differentiation of seeded MCSs. Bioactive factors with potent biological activity are also employed to promote the biological responsive and regenerative properties of the seeded MCSs. During the last 5 years, MSCs derived from bone marrow, synovium, adipose, and tonsil are widely explored with the combination of tissue engineering scaffolds for meniscus repair (Table 2).

Table 2 Preclinical advances in scaffold-based stem cell therapy in the last 5 years
Full size table

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs)

BMSCs are still the most popular MSCs for meniscus repair in the last 5 years. Compared with meniscus cells, BMSCs show comparable therapeutic effects for meniscus defect but express significantly more collagen II gene in a situation of early osteoarthritis [99]. Scaffolds made of natural-derived materials hold the advantages of good biocompatibility and were used to load and deliver BMSCs to repair the meniscus, of which decellularized meniscus matrix scaffold attract a lot of attention for it can inhibit the hypertrophic differentiation of seeded BMSCs and enhance the meniscus extracellular matrix production. Zhong et al. [100] investigated the meniscus repair performance of an injectable BMSCs-encapsulated decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix scaffold in rats. Histological and micro-CT results demonstrated the decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix scaffold can significantly promote the BMSCs fibrochondrogenic markers expression and prevent the osteoarthritis development compared with collagen hydrogel scaffold. Furthermore, BMSCs cultured in decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix scaffold produced more collagen I, collagen II, and aggrecan, presenting a closer phenotype to meniscus cells. In another study, an injectable biomimetic scaffold was designed using decellularized meniscus ECM hydrogel to deliver BMSCs for meniscus repair. The BMSCs were retained 8 weeks in the scaffold after implantation, which greatly contribute to the integrative repair of a full-thickness meniscus defect in rats [101]. Apart from decellularized meniscus matrix scaffolds, other natural source-based scaffolds have also been explored. Ying et al. [102] designed and fabricated a porous silk fibroin scaffold and used it to load BMSCs to repair meniscus injury in rabbits. The porous structure of the scaffold benefits BMSCs adhesion and proliferation as well as facilitates meniscus regeneration. 6 and 12 weeks after implantation, significant positive glycosaminoglycan (GAG), collagen I, collagen II, and S100 protein staining were observed around arranged fibrous cartilage-like neo-tissue in the defect area in the experimental group. Hu et al. [103] fabricated a novel sliver nanoparticle using Bauhinia acuminate plant flower extract. The silver nanoparticle can promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs as well as accelerate the healing process of the meniscus, which was attributed to its outstanding anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, and cell chemotaxis properties. In addition to nature-derived materials, the synthetic material-based scaffolds were also used as a stem cell loading and delivery system for meniscus repair. Zhang et al. [104] fabricated a novel 3D-printed poly(e-caprolactone) scaffold augmented with BMSCs. Compared with cell-free scaffold, the BMSCs-seeded scaffold can significantly promote the regeneration of the meniscus-like tissue and prevent the degeneration of articular cartilage (Fig. 3). Chen et al. [105] designed a thermosensitive, injectable, in situ crosslinked hydrogel with good biocompatibility and sustained release ability. The hydrogel was proved to promote the proliferation and fibrochondrogenic differentiation of BMSCs with the assistance of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1). Eight weeks after transplantation, amounts of fibrocartilaginous tissue expressing strong type II collagen intermingled with weak type I collagen were observed in the defect areas of the meniscus in the BMSCs-TGF-β1-hydrogel group, proposing an alternative therapy for meniscal injuries. Some studies pretreated the BMSCs with drugs or bioactive factors to further promote their regenerative ability and therapeutic effects. In a study designed by Liu et al. [106], the isolated BMSCs were cultured with various concentrations of kartogenin (KGN) for 2 weeks before transplantation. In vitro studies showed the chondrogenesis property of KGN co-cultured BMSCs increased in a KGN concentration-dependent manner. After implantation, BMSCs-containing gel showed better regenerative effects than BMSCs-free gel, which can be further enhanced by the addition of KGN and realize complete meniscus healing. Despite the advances in scaffold-based therapy, the mismatch between transplanted implants and patient-specific lesion shape still limits their application. To address the issue, a patient-specific BMSCs-loaded 3D bioprinting meniscus scaffold was designed and fabricated by Filardo et al. [107], which can fabricate perfect anatomical-match constructs with the native meniscus of patients by collecting and processing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data from MRI scans.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Copyright 2017, SAGE Publications

A Anatomical reconstruction model of rabbit menisci in left knee [104]. B A typical model of 3D medial meniscal scaffold. C 3D-printed poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold seeded with mesenchymal stem cells (scale bar represents 10 mm). D PCL scaffold (black arrow) implanted between femur and tibia, with medial collateral ligament (green arrow) reserved. Reproduced with permission [104].

Full size image

Synovium mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs)

Synovial tissue was considered a favorable MSCs source for its potent osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic capacities. In meniscus repair, SMSCs were considered to possess comparable or better therapeutic effects than BMSCs [77,78,79,80,81]. Recently, Shimomura et al. [108] designed an aligned electrospun nanofibrous scaffold with fiber direction matching that of the meniscal circumferential fibers. The scaffold was combined with SMSCs to repair damaged meniscus in a rabbit model. With favorable structural similarity and regenerative properties, the therapy can significantly promote new fibrocartilaginous tissue formation as well as prevent meniscal extrusion and articular cartilage degeneration. In another study, Li et al. [109] fabricated an ingenious scaffold as a drug and stem cell delivery system, which composed of 3D-printed PCL, meniscus extracellular matrix (MECM), and KGN-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microsphere (Fig. 4). The MECM and released KGN from the scaffold were proved to promote the adhesion, proliferation, and chondrogenic differentiation of the co-cultured SMSCs. Furthermore, SMSCs seeded in the scaffold presented a synergistic therapeutic effect with sustained released KGN in promoting the biocompatibility and chondrogenic properties of the scaffold.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Copyright 2021, Li et al. MECM, meniscus extracellular matrix; KGN, kartogenin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid; µS, microspheres

Schematic representation of the preparation process of the scaffolds [109]. Flow chart of the preparation of the A MECM gel, B KGN-containing PLGA microspheres, and C PCL/MECM-KGN µS scaffold; D Possible mechanism of meniscus regeneration. Enhanced mechanical strength, endogenous stem cells, and sustained releasing KGN contributed to meniscus regeneration in these experiments. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC license [109].

Full size image

Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs)

ADSCs attract much attention in regenerative medicine for their easy accessibility and high yield. Concerning meniscus repair, ADSCs can promote the regenerative properties and biological responses of co-transplanted scaffolds. For example, Abpeikar et al. [110] designed a novel scaffold composed of polycaprolactone/silk fibroin/gelatin/ascorbic acid. The scaffold possesses suitable mechanical properties and was seeded with ADSCs to repair the meniscus. The new meniscus regenerated in the scaffold group was proved to exhibit similar histological configuration and ECM deposition with native tissue. Romanazzo et al. [111] functionalized an alginate hydrogel scaffold with ECM from the inner and outer regions of the meniscus and ADSCs. The inner meniscus ECM can promote the chondrogenesis of the seeded stem cells while the outer meniscus ECM directs the stem cells to differentiate into fibroblastic phenotype. After supplementing transforming growth factor-β3 (TGFβ3), the inner and outer meniscus ECM can further promote the infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cell proliferation and differentiation as well as meniscus tissue regeneration. The mechanical properties of the scaffold can be strengthened by the combination of PCL microfibers and present a promising therapy for clinical meniscus injury. In another study, a severe meniscus tear model spanning 90% meniscus width was built in goat by Rothrauff et al. [112]. Such serve tear was proved to bear poor healing process and would lead to cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis after 6 months. A photocrosslinkable hydrogel loading ADSCs and TGF-b3 that procured intraoperatively was designed and implanted to augment the healing process of the meniscus tear. Compared with the suture-only group, the ADSCs-seeded hydrogel group showed significantly enhanced neo-tissue regeneration and chondroprotection abilities. However, Moradi et al. [113] demonstrated ADSC has no significant contribution to the healing process of meniscus injuries. They found the macroscopic, histological, and immunofluorescent outcomes of the articular chondrocytes-ADSCs scaffold are inferior to the articular chondrocytes scaffold. The chondroprotective property of the articular chondrocytes-ADSCs scaffold was even worse than the cell-free scaffold. It’s hypothesized that ADSCs had undergone morphological changes from fibroblast to sphere to present a mature hyaline phenotype, which significantly limited their chondrogenic property. So, further studies are needed to identify the therapeutic effects of ADSCs for meniscus repair.

Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (T-MSCs)

Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells (T-MSCs) from tonsillectomy hold advantages for their accessible and minimally invasive harvest procedure and have been explored in treating multiple musculoskeletal diseases [114,115,116]. Koh et al. [117] extracted a conditioned medium of meniscal fibrochondrocytes and TGF-β3 to expand T-MSCs. The T-MSCs were then encapsulated in riboflavin-induced photocrosslinked collagen–hyaluronic acid hydrogels to repair meniscus injuries. It turned out that conditioned medium-expanded T-MSCs followed by TGF-β3 exposure can promote fibrocartilage-related genes expression and extracellular matrix components production. Enhanced cell proliferation, glycosaminoglycan accumulation, and collagen deposition were observed in the CM-expanded T-MSCs group, indicating tonsil is a favorable stem cell source for meniscus repair.

Combined application of different cell sources

The combined application of MSCs from different sources was considered to propose superior effects in repairing the meniscus. Li et al. [118] utilized autogenous semitendinosus tendon as scaffold loading tendon-derived stem cells and SMSCs to reconstruct meniscus in rats. In vivo tests demonstrated the scaffold possesses favorable fibrochondrogenic and chondroprotective properties. Regenerated fibrochondrocytes, proteoglycan, and collagen were observed in the defect areas of the meniscus. Notably, the neo-meniscus tissue has similar biomechanical and chondroprotective properties with the native meniscus, indicating a promising application of combined MSCs from different sources.

Clinical advances in stem cell-based therapy

Many clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the effects of stem cell therapy in meniscus repair and achieved encouraging outcomes. A first-in-human study that combined surgical repair and SMSCs transplantation was conducted by Sekiya et al. [120]. In this clinical trial, 5 patients (mean age of 48.2 years, all-male) suffering from complex degenerative tear of the medial meniscus received surgical meniscus repair and subsequent SMSCs transplantation. Specifically, the meniscus tear was firstly treated by a standard surgical procedure using all-inside and inside-out repair techniques. Then a suspension of in vitro cultured autologous SMSCs was transplanted onto the repaired meniscus using an 18-gauge needle attached to a 1 mL syringe 2 weeks after the surgery (Fig. 5). Two years after SMSCs transplantation, increased scores for “pain,” “daily living,” and “sports activities” were presented in these patients. No adverse event occurred except an increase in c-reactive protein, a joint effusion, and a localized warmth of the knee were recorded, which can both be relative to the meniscal repair surgery or SMSC transplantation. This study suggested the surgical repair in combination with SMSC transplantation has a promising effect in alleviating the clinical symptoms of complex meniscus tear patients. Another clinical trial conducted by Sekiya et al. [121] also combined meniscus repair surgery with SMSC transplantation, which treated 6 patients (5 male and 1 female with a mean age of 54 years) with degenerative flaps and radial tears of the medial meniscus using the same treatment procedure. For the 4 flaps tears patients, the tear zone was completely restored to stable and smooth in two patients and partially restored in the other two patients during the 52 weeks follow-up. The other two radial tear patients were also reported to be completely healed at the final follow-up. The arthroscopy score and Lysholm score were significantly higher than the preoperative level in all patients 1 year after being treated by this therapy. Mahajan et al. [122] injected the autologous MSCs compound derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue and platelet-rich plasma into the venous and knee joint of a patient (31-year-old female) who suffered from meniscus injury and was unwilling to accept surgery. Improved clinical parameters and enhanced meniscus and ligament tissue regeneration were observed according to MRI images 1 year after treatment, indicating a promising perspective of using autologous MSCs compound to treat meniscus tear. In addition to cell injection, the combined therapy involved tissue engineering scaffold and stem cells has also been explored in the clinic. For example, Whitehouse et al. [119] optimized the autologous BMSCs-seeded collagen scaffold in a sheep meniscal cartilage tear model. Confirming encouraging results in sheep, they conduct a single-center, prospective, open-label study translating the therapy to the clinic to treat 5 patients (mean age of 37 years, 4 male and 1 female) with a complex degenerative tear of the medial meniscus. In this study, autologous BMSCs were isolated, cultured, and transplanted to a collagen-based scaffold at a density of 1.0 × 106/cm2. Then the BMSCs/collagen scaffold was inserted into the meniscus lesion through the arthroscope and fixed with a vertical mattress suture. Significantly improved clinical symptoms were observed in three patients who have no clinical and radiological evidence of recurrent tear while the other two patients needed to receive subsequent meniscectomy due to retear or nonhealing of the meniscal tear at approximately 15 months after the initial surgery. This study indicated the combination of collagen-based scaffold implantation with BMSC transplantation can alleviate the clinical symptoms of meniscus tear patients but have a relatively high failure rate. In another study, Olivos-Meza et al. [123] firstly employed polyurethane meniscal scaffolds loading with BMSCs to improve the prognosis of patients who underwent meniscectomy. Seventeen patients (13 male and 4 female with a mean age of 36 years) who received meniscectomy were enrolled in the trial. Standard anterolateral and anteromedial arthroscopic portals were employed and the polyurethane scaffold was implanted through a 10-mm cannula and sutured to the capsule and native meniscus borders using all-inside, inside-out, and outside-in fixation techniques. The therapeutic effects of transplanting acellular polyurethane scaffold (APS) or polyurethane scaffold enriched with BMSC (MPS) were evaluated and compared by T2 mapping at 12 months postoperatively. The T2 mapping values of the tibia in the MPS group increased slightly at 9 months and returned to initial values at 12 months, while a significant decline from 3 to 12 months was observed in the APS group. At the final time point, the difference tended to be negligible between the MPS group and the APS group (P > 0.05), suggesting no benefit was obtained by the addition of BMSCs. Thus, further studies involving more patients and longer follow-up times are needed to evaluate the effects of MSCs as adjuvant therapy for the polyurethane scaffold implantation (Table 3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Copyright 2019, Sekiya et al.

Procedure for transplantation of synovial MSCs onto the repaired meniscus [120]. A Whole blood after centrifugation to prepare autologous human serum. B Arthroscopic meniscal repair. C Synovium harvest with a pituitary rongeur. D Synovium tissues as an MSC source. E SMSCs 1 day after plating. F SMSCs 14 days after plating. G SMSC suspension in a syringe. H Arthroscopic transplantation of SMSCs. (I) SMSC suspension was placed onto the repaired meniscus. Reproduced under the terms of the CC BY-NC license [120].

Full size image
Table 3 Clinical advances in stem cell-based therapy in the last 5 years
Full size table

In conclusion, the clinical trials published during the last 5 years demonstrated encouraging results using stem cell-based strategies to repair meniscus tears. Most treated patients obtained knee joint function improvement and pain relief. However, the small number of patients, absence of a control group, short follow-up time greatly limit the credibility of these studies. Three studies combine the standard surgical treatment with intra-articular injection of stem cells, which bear a serious risk of bias for the absence of a control group (isolated standard surgical treatment). Furthermore, the only study that set up a control group conducted by Meza et al. demonstrated no benefit was obtained by the addition of BMSCs compared with acellular polyurethane scaffold. The considerable heterogeneity of these studies also makes it difficult to conclude the therapeutic effects of stem cell-based strategy for meniscus regeneration. Thus, large multi-center clinical projects are needed to further validate the full utility of these stem cell-based therapies for meniscus injury.

Discussion

According to the available literature, several elements should be considered to promote the therapeutic effects and translational prospect of stem cell-based therapy for meniscus repair. Firstly, the safety of the transplanted stem cells should be emphasized. The gene expression profile of long-time in vitro culture autologous stem cells will change, so the possibility of carcinogenesis and damaged differentiation potential should be paid attention. Also, it should be alert to autoimmune reactions if the allogeneic stem cells are involved for it can lead to serious clinical consequences [124]. Secondly, concerning the medium of culturing MSCs for meniscus repair, the serum-free medium containing TGF-β and dexamethasone that can promote proteoglycans production and integrative repair was considered the priority for MSC-seeded scaffolds, while the serum-containing medium is more suitable for the meniscus tissue composition-based scaffolds [91]. Thirdly, although stem cells as a growth factor mediator can produce and regulate the expression and activity of many bioactive factors, the involvement of bioactive factors that can induce cell differentiation and meniscus regeneration may help enhance the therapeutic effects of cell-based therapy. For example, the meniscus-derived decellularized matrix was reported to need the assistance of transforming growth factor beta-3 (TGF-β3) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) to direct the chondrogenic differentiation of synovial fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells [125]. Tarafder et al. [126, 127] evaluated the effects of connective tissue growth factor and TGF-β3 in repairing avascular meniscus tears. The short-term high dose release of connective tissue growth factor was proved to recruit stem cells to tear site and produce integrated fibrous matrix while sustained slow release of TGF-β3 can induce the fibrous matrix to convert into the fibrocartilaginous matrix, thus achieving seamless healing of avascular meniscus tears. Apart from transforming growth factors β1 and β3, Mohawk is another key transcription factor identified recently that can promote meniscus cell phenotype and tissue repair [128]. RNA sequencing data from 37 human tissues in the Genotype-Tissue Expression database and meniscus and articular cartilage showed Mohawk factor is highly expressed in the meniscus. The Mohawk transcription factor can also induce BMSCs to differentiate into meniscus cell phenotype with the cooperation of TGF-β3. Adenoviral-MKX-transduced BMSCs-loaded decellularized meniscus scaffold has achieved encouraging outcomes in repairing meniscus tear with increased glycosaminoglycan content, extracellular matrix interconnectivity, and biomechanical properties. Besides, SDF-1 was also hypothesized as a factor that can stimulate MSCs to differentiate to meniscus cell phenotype. Intra-articular administration of SDF-1 can recruit macrophages, CD90-positive cells, and CD105-positive cells to the defect area and contribute to meniscus healing [129]. SDF-1 preconditioned C-PCs can successfully migrate from the scaffold and adhere to meniscus lesions to stimulate bridging of meniscus tears. However, the SDF-1 preconditioned C-PCs didn’t express more chondrogenic genes [130]. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the underlying relationship between SDF-1 and meniscus regeneration. Fourthly, complementary clinical techniques, including novel stem cell isolation and transplantation method and the corresponding postoperative radiographical evaluation, should receive more attention and be innovated to promote the clinical transformation of stem cell therapy. An example is the sonographically guided knee meniscus injection technique invented by Baria et al. [94], which provides an opportunity to deliver stem cells to the specific injury area of the meniscus accurately and safely.

Despite the fact that many advances have been achieved in stem cell-based therapy, obstacles remain before their successful clinical translation. Firstly, the studies focusing on applying stem cells in meniscus repair are heterogeneous in animal models, cell sources, and scaffolds, and too limited comparative studies are available to conclude the most promising stem cell [29]. Martin et al. [131] once conducted a comparative study evaluating the regenerative capacity of articular chondrocytes, meniscus cells, fat pad cells, and synovial membrane cells in a hyaluronan-based scaffold for meniscus repair to identify the best cell source that available from knee joint arthroscopy. It tuned out only articular chondrocytes possess the ability to form neo-meniscus that contains relevant amounts of collagen and glycosaminoglycan and presents compatible cell phenotypes with the inner and outer native meniscus regions. However, stem cell-related data regarding the best cell source is not available and further comparative researches are needed. Secondly, although many studies suggested that higher stem cell number is related to better therapeutic effects in repairing meniscus, there is currently no consensus on the relationship between cell number and repair effects [89, 90]. A study demonstrated the effect of producing anti-inflammatory cytokines by MSCs after injuries were time and cell number dependent and 6 weeks and 106 cells were considered the lower limit [132,133,134,135], while another study proved the largest amount of BMSCs did not correspond to the best quality and largest quantity of bridging tissue in repairing meniscus [136]. However, with the same cell number, transplantation of aggregates of MSCs was considered to have better therapeutic effects than suspension of MSCs [78]. Due to the strict monitoring of the clinical application of stem cell therapy, a low limit cell number with effective therapeutic effect needed to be determined in further studies. From another perspective, the modification and conditioned culture that can increase the chondrogenic-differentiation potential and activity of the isolated stem cells may be a promising solution for this problem. For example, the culture medium containing TGF-β is considered to endow the stem cells with extra meniscus-like tissue regeneration ability and promote proteoglycans production and integrative repair after transplantation [91]. Besides, cell-free strategies that focus on recruiting endogenous stem cells to the injured areas of the meniscus can also be a solution and are attracting increasing attention in recent years [137, 138]. For example, Ruprecht et al. [139] demonstrated the meniscus-derived matrix scaffolds can promote meniscus repair by recruiting endogenous meniscus cells from the surrounding microenvironment, both endogenous meniscal cells and exogenously seeded BMSCs can infiltrate the meniscus-derived matrix scaffolds and show comparable ability in promoting the integrative repair of a meniscal tear. Thirdly, a well-designed scaffold can not only provide a 3D support but also a suitable physicochemical environment that can keep the self-renewal and induce directional differentiation of loaded stem cells [37]. Scaffold-based 3D assemblies of stem cells also enhance intercellular interaction, which is essential to promote an orchestral tissue regeneration similar to which occurs during embryogenesis [140]. Thus, more ingenious scaffolds are needed for better therapeutic effects of stem cell-based therapy. Constructing a mimicking 3D microstructure is the key point to induce specific tissue regeneration [141]. For example, scaffolds with a porous structure are more likely to possess osteogenesis properties. It’s encouraged to explore a kind of scaffold microstructure that can induce stem cells to differentiate toward meniscus-like fibrocartilage tissue. Apart from specific microstructure, loading bioactive molecular is another method to enhance the biological responsive properties of scaffold [142]. TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor, and connective tissue growth factor can induce stem cells to differentiate toward chondrogenic direction and show a promising future when co-loaded with stem cells in scaffolds. Fourthly, despite many studies demonstrating that transplanted stem cells can promote neo-meniscus tissue regeneration, but if the stem cells can form durable regenerative meniscus comparable to the natural meniscus is still to be confirmed [84]. Thus, future studies should pay more attention to the composition and structure similarity between the regenerated meniscus tissue and the original meniscus. Longer postoperative follow-up should also be involved to assess the long-term structural and functional stability of the neo-meniscus tissue.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the intrinsic advantages of stem cell therapy such as potent regenerative ability, combined with encouraging results obtained in numerous preclinical and several small clinical trials, convinced us it’s a promising option for repairing meniscus injury. Ingenious-designed and manufactured scaffolds, as well as further identified meniscus-regenerative bioactive factors, can also be combined with stem cell therapy to obtain synergies. Meanwhile, attention should also be paid to the obstructs before the successful clinical translation of stem cell therapies, no matter in technique, or regulatory policy, and more efforts are needed to further optimize the self-renewal and directional differentiation properties of transplanted stem cell to accelerate the realization of stem cell-based therapy for the benefits of meniscus injury patients.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

BMSCs:

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

SMSCs:

Synovium mesenchymal stem cells

MMSCs:

Meniscus-derived mesenchymal stem cells

ADSCs:

Adipose-derived stem cells

BMAC:

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate

PRP:

Platelet-rich plasma

C-PCs:

Cartilage chondroprogenitor cells

SDF-1:

Stromal cell-derived factor-1

KGN:

Kartogenin

PCL:

Poly(e-caprolactone)

MECM:

Meniscus extracellular matrix

PLGA:

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid

SDF-1:

Stromal cell-derived factor-1

TGF-β1:

Transforming growth factor-β1

TGF-β3:

Transforming growth factor-β3

T-MSCs:

Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells

GAG:

Glycosaminoglycan

APS:

Acellular polyurethane scaffold

MPS:

Polyurethane scaffold enriched with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

BMI:

Body mass index

FGF-2:

Fibroblast growth factor-2

IKDC:

The International Knee Documentation Committee score

ROM:

Range of motion

KOOS:

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale score

NRS:

Numerical Rating Scale

References

  1. McDermott ID, Amis AA. The consequences of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88B(12):1549–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Markes AR, Hodax JD, Benjamin C. Meniscus form and function. Clin Sports Med. 2020;39(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seedhom BB. Load bearing function of the menisci of the knee joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1975;34:118–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee: a study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51(6):871–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T, Nakajima H. Load-bearing mode of the knee-joint—physical behavior of the knee-joint with or without menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;149:283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. King D. The classic–the healing of semilunar cartilages. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10(2):90–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawamura S, Lotito K, Rodeo SA. Biomechanics and healing response of the meniscus. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2003;11(2):68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Assimakopoulos AP, Katonis PG, Agapitos MV, Exarchou EI. The innervation of the human meniscus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;275:232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray JC. Neural and vascular anatomy of the menisci of the human knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(1):23–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell J, Graham W, Best TM, Collins C, Currie DW, Comstock RD, Flanigan DC. Epidemiology of meniscal injuries in US high school athletes between 2007 and 2013. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(3):715–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baker BE, Peckham AC, Pupparo F, Sanborn JC. Review of meniscal injury and associated sports. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(1):1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nielsen AB, Yde J. Epidemiology of acute knee injuries: a prospective hospital investigation. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 1991;31(12):1644–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Englund M, Roemer FW, Hayashi D, Crema MD, Guermazi A. Meniscus pathology, osteoarthritis and the treatment controversy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(7):412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hiyama K, Muneta T, Koga H, Sekiya I, Tsuji K. Meniscal regeneration after resection of the anterior half of the medial meniscus in mice. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(9):1958–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(10):1756–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Englund M, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Impact of type of meniscal tear on radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a sixteen-year followup of meniscectomy with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(8):2178–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perrone D. Upon a case of right internal meniscus injur; meniscectomy. Med Cir Farm. 1946;8(1):20–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grana WA, Connor S, Hollingsworth S. Partial arthroscopic meniscectomy: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;164:78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garrett JC, Steensen RN. Meniscal transplantation in the human knee: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 1991;7(1):57–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu C, Toma IC, Mastrogiacomo M, Krettek C, von Lewinski G, Jagodzinski M. Meniscus reconstruction: today’s achievements and premises for the future. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(1):95–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carlos Monllau J, Eduardo Gelber P, Abat F, Pelfort X, Abad R, Hinarejos P, Tey M. Outcome after partial medial meniscus substitution with the collagen meniscal implant at a minimum of 10 years’ follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2011;27(7):933–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bulgheroni P, Murena L, Ratti C, Bulgheroni E, Ronga M, Cherubino P. Follow-up of collagen meniscus implant patients: clinical, radiological, and magnetic resonance imaging results at 5 years. Knee. 2010;17(3):224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spencer SJ, Saithna A, Carmont MR, Dhillon MS, Thompson P, Spalding T. Meniscal scaffolds: early experience and review of the literature. Knee. 2012;19(6):760–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lubowitz JH, Verdonk PCM, Reid JB III, Verdonk R. Meniscus allograft transplantation: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(5):476–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McDermott ID. What tissue bankers should know about the use of allograft meniscus in orthopaedics. Cell Tissue Bank. 2010;11(1):75–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harston A, Nyland J, Brand E, McGinnis M, Caborn DNM. Collagen meniscus implantation: a systematic review including rehabilitation and return to sports activity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(1):135–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Myers KR, Sgaglione NA, Kurzweil PR. A current update on meniscal scaffolds. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2013;21(2):75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Korpershoek JV, de Windt TS, Hagmeijer MH, Vonk LA, Saris DB. Cell-based meniscus repair and regeneration: at the brink of clinical translation? A systematic review of preclinical studies. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(2):2325967117690131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacob G, Shimomura K, Krych AJ, Nakamura N. The meniscus tear: a review of stem cell therapies. Cells. 2019;9(1):92.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu H, Adesida AB, Jomha NM. Meniscus repair using mesenchymal stem cells: a comprehensive review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Niu W, Guo W, Han S, Zhu Y, Liu S, Guo Q. Cell-based strategies for meniscus tissue engineering. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:4717184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Seol D, Zhou C, Brouillette MJ, Song I, Yu Y, Choe HH, Lehman AD, Jang KW, Fredericks DC, Laughlin BJ, Martin JA. Characteristics of meniscus progenitor cells migrated from injured meniscus. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(9):1966–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowles RD, Setton LA. Biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration and repair. Biomaterials. 2017;129:54–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith BD, Grande DA. The current state of scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative applications. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(4):213–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tuan RS. Regenerative medicine in 2012: the coming of age of musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(2):74–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Koons GL, Diba M, Mikos AG. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5(8):584–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gangji V, Hauzeur JP, Matos C, De Maertelaer V, Toungouz M, Lambermont M. Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with implantation of autologous bone-marrow cells: a pilot study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(6):1153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tabatabaee RM, Saberi S, Parvizi J, Mortazavi SM, Farzan M. Combining concentrated autologous bone marrow stem cells injection with core decompression improves outcome for patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a comparative study. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(9 Suppl):11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Houdek MT, Wyles CC, Collins MS, Howe BM, Terzic A, Behfar A, Sierra RJ. Stem cells combined with platelet-rich plasma effectively treat corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the hip: a prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(2):388–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Meirelles LdS, Caplan AI, Nardi NB. In search of the in vivo identity of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26(9):2287–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Le Blanc K, Ringden O. Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells and clinical experience. J Intern Med. 2007;262(5):509–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fong ELS, Chan CK, Goodman SB. Stem cell homing in musculoskeletal injury. Biomaterials. 2011;32(2):395–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fox AJ, Wanivenhaus F, Burge AJ, Warren RF, Rodeo SA. The human meniscus: a review of anatomy, function, injury, and advances in treatment. Clin Anat. 2015;28(2):269–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Markes AR, Hodax JD, Ma CB. Meniscus form and function. Clin Sports Med. 2020;39(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gee SM, Posner M. Meniscus anatomy and basic science. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021;29(3):e18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wilson AS, Legg PG, McNeur JC. Studies on the innervation of the medial meniscus in the human knee joint. Anat Rec. 1969;165(4):485–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Day B, Mackenzie WG, Shim SS, Leung G. The vascular and nerve supply of the human meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1985;1(1):58–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Longo UG, Campi S, Romeo G, Spiezia F, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Biological strategies to enhance healing of the avascular area of the meniscus. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:528359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Makris EA, Hadidi P, Athanasiou KA. The knee meniscus: Structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7411–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zubkov VS, Breward CJ, Gaffney EA. Meniscal tear film fluid dynamics near Marx’s line. Bull Math Biol. 2013;75(9):1524–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Verdonk PCM, Forsyth RG, Wang J, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Veys EM, Verbruggen G. Characterisation of human knee meniscus cell phenotype. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005;13(7):548–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Le Graverand MPH, Ou Y, Schield-Yee T, Barclay L, Hart D, Natsume T, Rattner JB. The cells of the rabbit meniscus: their arrangement, interrelationship, morphological variations and cytoarchitecture. J Anat. 2001;198:525–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mandal BB, Park S-H, Gil ES, Kaplan DL. Stem cell-based meniscus tissue engineering. Tissue Eng A. 2011;17(21–22):2749–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Herwig J, Egner E, Buddecke E. Chemical-changes of human knee-joint menisci in various stages of degeneration. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43(4):635–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Fithian DC, Kelly MA, Mow VC. Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Seedhom BB, Dowson D, Wright V. Proceedings: functions of the menisci. A preliminary study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1974;33(1):111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Shrive NG, O’Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW. Load-bearing in the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;131:279–87.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Walker PS, Erkman MJ. The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;109:184–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. A study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51(6):871–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T, Nakajima H. Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;149:283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mine T, Kimura M, Sakka A, Kawai S. Innervation of nociceptors in the menisci of the knee joint: an immunohistochemical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(3–4):201–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Andrews SHJ, Adesida AB, Abusara Z, Shrive NG. Current concepts on structure-function relationships in the menisci. Connect Tissue Res. 2017;58(3–4):271–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Swann DA, Silver FH, Slayter HS, Stafford W, Shore E. The molecular structure and lubricating activity of lubricin isolated from bovine and human synovial fluids. Biochem J. 1985;225(1):195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Greis PE, Bardana DD, Holmstrom MC, Burks RT. Meniscal injury: I. Basic science and evaluation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(3):168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Fu X, Liu G, Halim A, Ju Y, Luo Q, Song G. Mesenchymal stem cell migration and tissue repair. Cells. 2019;8(8):784.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Han Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Han Y, Chang F, Ding J. Mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine. Cells. 2019;8(8):886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Samsonraj RM, Raghunath M, Nurcombe V, Hui JH, van Wijnen AJ, Cool SM. Concise review: multifaceted characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells for use in regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(12):2173–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Andia I, Maffulli N. Biological therapies in regenerative sports medicine. Sports Med. 2017;47(5):807–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zellner J, Mueller M, Berner A, Dienstknecht T, Kujat R, Nerlich M, Hennemann B, Koller M, Prantl L, Angele M, Angele P. Role of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering of meniscus. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;94A(4):1150–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Izuta Y, Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Yamasaki T, Shinomiya R. Meniscal repair using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: experimental study using green fluorescent protein transgenic rats. Knee. 2005;12(3):217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dutton AQ, Choong PF, Goh JCH, Lee EH, Hui JHP. Enhancement of meniscal repair in the avascular zone using mesenchymal stem cells in a porcine model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92B(1):169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Duygulu F, Demirel M, Atalan G, Kaymaz FF, Kocabey Y, Dulgeroglu TC, Candemir H. Effects of intra-articular administration of autologous bone marrow aspirate on healing of full-thickness meniscal tear: an experimental study on sheep. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(1):61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Horie M, Driscoll MD, Sampson HW, Sekiya I, Caroom CT, Prockop DJ, Thomas DB. Implantation of allogenic synovial stem cells promotes meniscal regeneration in a rabbit meniscal defect model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94A(8):701–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Matsukura Y, Muneta T, Tsuji K, Koga H, Sekiya I. Mesenchymal stem cells in synovial fluid increase after meniscus injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1357–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hatsushika D, Muneta T, Horie M, Koga H, Tsuji K, Sekiya I. Intraarticular injection of synovial stem cells promotes meniscal regeneration in a rabbit massive meniscal defect model. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(9):1354–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Katagiri H, Muneta T, Tsuji K, Horie M, Koga H, Ozeki N, Kobayashi E, Sekiya I. Transplantation of aggregates of synovial mesenchymal stem cells regenerates meniscus more effectively in a rat massive meniscal defect. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;435(4):603–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Moriguchi Y, Tateishi K, Ando W, Shimomura K, Yonetani Y, Tanaka Y, Kita K, Hart DA, Gobbi A, Shino K, Yoshikawa H, Nakamura N. Repair of meniscal lesions using a scaffold-free tissue-engineered construct derived from allogenic synovial MSCs in a miniature swine model. Biomaterials. 2013;34(9):2185–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sakaguchi Y, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Muneta T. Comparison of human stem cells derived from various mesenchymal tissues: superiority of synovium as a cell source. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(8):2521–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Ozeki N, Koga H, Sekiya I. Homeostasis and disorder of musculoskeletal system. Transplantation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage and meniscus regeneration. Clin Calcium. 2018;28(3):319–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Horie M, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Ichinose S, Matsumoto K, Saito H, Murakami T, Kobayashi E. Intra-articular injected synovial stem cells differentiate into meniscal cells directly and promote meniscal regeneration without mobilization to distant organs in rat massive meniscal defect. Stem Cells. 2009;27(4):878–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ding Z, Huang H. Mesenchymal stem cells in rabbit meniscus and bone marrow exhibit a similar feature but a heterogeneous multi-differentiation potential: superiority of meniscus as a cell source for meniscus repair. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Gamer LW, Shi RR, Gendelman A, Mathewson D, Gamer J, Rosen V. Identification and characterization of adult mouse meniscus stem/progenitor cells. Connect Tissue Res. 2017;58(3–4):238–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Sun H, Wen X, Li H, Wu P, Gu M, Zhao X, Zhang Z, Hu S, Mao G, Ma R, Liao W, Zhang Z. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis identifies meniscus progenitors and reveals the progression of meniscus degeneration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(3):408–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Segawa Y, Muneta T, Makino H, Nimura A, Mochizuki T, Ju Y-J, Ezura Y, Umezawa A, Sekiya I. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from synovium, meniscus, anterior cruciate ligament, and articular chondrocytes share similar gene expression profiles. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(4):435–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mazini L, Rochette L, Amine M, Malka G. Regenerative capacity of adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs), comparison with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98(5):1076–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Koch M, Hammer S, Fuellerer J, Lang S, Pfeifer CG, Pattappa G, Weber J, Loibl M, Nerlich M, Angele P, Zellner J. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate for the treatment of avascular meniscus tears in a one-step procedure-evaluation of an in vivo model. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Nakayama N, Pothiawala A, Lee JY, Matthias N, Umeda K, Ang BK, Huard J, Huang Y, Sun D. Human pluripotent stem cell-derived chondroprogenitors for cartilage tissue engineering. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77(13):2543–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Jayasuriya CT, Twomey-Kozak J, Newberry J, Desai S, Feltman P, Franco JR, Li N, Terek R, Ehrlich MG, Owens BD. Human cartilage-derived progenitors resist terminal differentiation and require CXCR4 activation to successfully bridge meniscus tissue tears. Stem Cells. 2019;37(1):102–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Girdler NM. In vitro synthesis and characterization of a cartilaginous meniscus grown from isolated temporomandibular chondroprogenitor cells. Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27(6):446–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Toratani T, Nakase J, Numata H, Oshima T, Takata Y, Nakayama K, Tsuchiya H. Scaffold-free tissue-engineered allogenic adipose-derived stem cells promote meniscus healing. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ozeki N, Kohno Y, Kushida Y, Watanabe N, Mizuno M, Katano H, Masumoto J, Koga H, Sekiya I. Synovial mesenchymal stem cells promote the meniscus repair in a novel pig meniscus injury model. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(1):177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Kondo S, Muneta T, Nakagawa Y, Koga H, Watanabe T, Tsuji K, Sotome S, Okawa A, Kiuchi S, Ono H, Mizuno M, Sekiya I. Transplantation of autologous synovial mesenchymal stem cells promotes meniscus regeneration in aged primates. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(6):1274–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bilgen B, Jayasuriya CT, Owens BD. Current concepts in meniscus tissue engineering and repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(11):e1701407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Chen M, Guo W, Gao S, Hao C, Shen S, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Wang Z, Li X, Jing X, Zhang X, Yuan Z, Wang M, Zhang Y, Peng J, Wang A, Wang Y, Sui X, Liu S, Guo Q. Biochemical stimulus-based strategies for meniscus tissue engineering and regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8472309.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Chen M, Guo W, Gao S, Hao C, Shen S, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Li X, Jing X, Zhang X, Yuan Z, Wang M, Zhang Y, Peng J, Wang A, Wang Y, Sui X, Liu S, Guo Q. Biomechanical stimulus based strategies for meniscus tissue engineering and regeneration. Tissue Eng B Rev. 2018;24(5):392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Zellner J, Pattappa G, Koch M, Lang S, Weber J, Pfeifer CG, Mueller MB, Kujat R, Nerlich M, Angele P. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells or meniscal cells: what is the best cell source for regenerative meniscus treatment in an early osteoarthritis situation? Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):225.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Zhong G, Yao J, Huang X, Luo Y, Wang M, Han J, Chen F, Yu Y. Injectable ECM hydrogel for delivery of BMSCs enabled full-thickness meniscus repair in an orthotopic rat model. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):871–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Yuan X, Wei Y, Villasante A, Ng JJD, Arkonac DE, Chao PG, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Stem cell delivery in tissue-specific hydrogel enabled meniscal repair in an orthotopic rat model. Biomaterials. 2017;132:59–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Ying XZ, Qian JJ, Peng L, Zheng Q, Zhu B, Jin YH. Model research on repairing meniscus injury in rabbits using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and silk fibroin meniscus porous scaffold. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(12):3689–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hu D, Gu X, Si W, Qin W, Jiao J, Hao Y. Biosynthesis of Silver nanoparticles using Bauhinia acuminate flower extract and their effect to promote osteogenesis of MSCs and improve meniscus injury healing. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2019;197:111536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Zhang ZZ, Wang SJ, Zhang JY, Jiang WB, Huang AB, Qi YS, Ding JX, Chen XS, Jiang D, Yu JK. 3D-Printed Poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold augmented with mesenchymal stem cells for total meniscal substitution: a 12- and 24-week animal study in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(7):1497–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Chen C, Song J, Qiu J, Zhao J. Repair of a meniscal defect in a rabbit model through use of a thermosensitive, injectable, in situ crosslinked hydrogel with encapsulated bone mesenchymal stromal cells and transforming growth factor β1. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(4):884–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Liu F, Xu H, Huang H. A novel kartogenin-platelet-rich plasma gel enhances chondrogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and promotes wounded meniscus healing in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Filardo G, Petretta M, Cavallo C, Roseti L, Durante S, Albisinni U, Grigolo B. Patient-specific meniscus prototype based on 3D bioprinting of human cell-laden scaffold. Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(2):101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Shimomura K, Rothrauff BB, Hart DA, Hamamoto S, Kobayashi M, Yoshikawa H, Tuan RS, Nakamura N. Enhanced repair of meniscal hoop structure injuries using an aligned electrospun nanofibrous scaffold combined with a mesenchymal stem cell-derived tissue engineered construct. Biomaterials. 2019;192:346–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Li H, Liao Z, Yang Z, Gao C, Fu L, Li P, Zhao T, Cao F, Chen W, Yuan Z, Sui X, Liu S, Guo Q. 3D Printed poly(ε-caprolactone)/meniscus extracellular matrix composite scaffold functionalized with kartogenin-releasing PLGA microspheres for meniscus tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:662381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Abpeikar Z, Moradi L, Javdani M, Kargozar S, Soleimannejad M, Hasanzadeh E, Mirzaei SA, Asadpour S. Characterization of macroporous polycaprolactone/silk fibroin/gelatin/ascorbic acid composite scaffolds and in vivo results in a rabbit model for meniscus cartilage repair. Cartilage. 2021;19476035211035418.

  111. Romanazzo S, Vedicherla S, Moran C, Kelly DJ. Meniscus ECM-functionalised hydrogels containing infrapatellar fat pad-derived stem cells for bioprinting of regionally defined meniscal tissue. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12(3):e1826–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Rothrauff BB, Sasaki H, Kihara S, Overholt KJ, Gottardi R, Lin H, Fu FH, Tuan RS, Alexander PG. Point-of-care procedure for enhancement of meniscal healing in a goat model utilizing infrapatellar fat pad-derived stromal vascular fraction cells seeded in photocrosslinkable hydrogel. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(14):3396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Moradi L, Vasei M, Dehghan MM, Majidi M, Farzad Mohajeri S, Bonakdar S. Regeneration of meniscus tissue using adipose mesenchymal stem cells-chondrocytes co-culture on a hybrid scaffold: in vivo study. Biomaterials. 2017;126:18–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Moon HJ, Patel M, Chung H, Jeong B. Nanocomposite versus mesocomposite for osteogenic differentiation of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(3):353–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Kim HD, Jang HL, Ahn HY, Lee HK, Park J, Lee ES, Lee EA, Jeong YH, Kim DG, Nam KT, Hwang NS. Biomimetic whitlockite inorganic nanoparticles-mediated in situ remodeling and rapid bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2017;112:31–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Park MH, Yu Y, Moon HJ, Ko du Y, Kim HS, Lee H, Ryu KH, Jeong B. 3D culture of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells in poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(L-alanine-co-L-phenyl alanine) thermogel. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(11):1782–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Koh RH, Jin Y, Kang BJ, Hwang NS. Chondrogenically primed tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in riboflavin-induced photocrosslinking collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogel for meniscus tissue repairs. Acta Biomater. 2017;53:318–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Li C, Hu X, Meng Q, Zhang X, Zhu J, Dai L, Cheng J, Zhong M, Shi W, Ren B, Zhang J, Fu X, Duan X, Ao Y. The potential of using semitendinosus tendon as autograft in rabbit meniscus reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Whitehouse MR, Howells NR, Parry MC, Austin E, Kafienah W, Brady K, Goodship AE, Eldridge JD, Blom AW, Hollander AP. Repair of torn avascular meniscal cartilage using undifferentiated autologous mesenchymal stem cells: from in vitro optimization to a first-in-human study. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(4):1237–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Sekiya I, Koga H, Otabe K, Nakagawa Y, Katano H, Ozeki N, Mizuno M, Horie M, Kohno Y, Katagiri K, Watanabe N, Muneta T. Additional use of synovial mesenchymal stem cell transplantation following surgical repair of a complex degenerative tear of the medial meniscus of the knee: a case report. Cell Transplant. 2019;28(11):1445–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Sekiya I, Koga H, Katano H, Mizuno M, Kohno Y, Otabe K, Ozeki N. Second-look arthroscopy after meniscus repair and synovial mesenchymal stem cell transplantation to treat degenerative flaps and radial tears of the medial meniscus: a case report. J Orthop Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2021.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Mahajan PV, Subramanian S, Parab SC, Mahajan S. Autologous minimally invasive cell-based therapy for meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament regeneration. Case Rep Orthop. 2021;2021:6614232.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Olivos-Meza A, Pérez Jiménez FJ, Granados-Montiel J, Landa-Solís C, Cortés González S, Jiménez Aroche CA, Valdez Chávez M, Renán León S, Gomez-Garcia R, Martínez-López V, Ortega-Sánchez C, Parra-Cid C, Velasquillo Martinez C, Ibarra C. First clinical application of polyurethane meniscal scaffolds with mesenchymal stem cells and assessment of cartilage quality with T2 mapping at 12 months. Cartilage. 2019;13:197S-207S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Liang Y, Idrees E, Szojka ARA, Andrews SHJ, Kunze M, Mulet-Sierra A, Jomha NM, Adesida AB. Chondrogenic differentiation of synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells on human meniscus-derived decellularized matrix requires exogenous growth factors. Acta Biomater. 2018;80:131–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Tarafder S, Gulko J, Sim KH, Yang J, Cook JL, Lee CH. Engineered healing of avascular meniscus tears by stem cell recruitment. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Tarafder S, Gulko J, Kim D, Sim KH, Gutman S, Yang J, Cook JL, Lee CH. Effect of dose and release rate of CTGF and TGFβ3 on avascular meniscus healing. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(7):1555–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Lee KI, Gamini R, Olmer M, Ikuta Y, Hasei J, Baek J, Alvarez-Garcia O, Grogan SP, D’Lima DD, Asahara H, Su AI, Lotz MK. Mohawk is a transcription factor that promotes meniscus cell phenotype and tissue repair and reduces osteoarthritis severity. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(567):eaan7967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Nishida Y, Hashimoto Y, Orita K, Nishino K, Kinoshita T, Nakamura H. Intra-articular injection of stromal cell-derived factor 1α promotes meniscal healing via macrophage and mesenchymal stem cell accumulation in a rat meniscal defect model. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Newberry J, Desai S, Adler C, Li N, Karamchedu NP, Fleming BC, Jayasuriya CT. SDF-1 preconditioned HPC scaffolds mobilize cartilage-derived progenitors and stimulate meniscal fibrocartilage repair in human explant tissue culture. Connect Tissue Res. 2020;61(3–4):338–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Marsano A, Millward-Sadler SJ, Salter DM, Adesida A, Hardingham T, Tognana E, Kon E, Chiari-Grisar C, Nehrer S, Jakob M, Martin I. Differential cartilaginous tissue formation by human synovial membrane, fat pad, meniscus cells and articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15(1):48–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. ter Huurne M, Schelbergen R, Blattes R, Blom A, de Munter W, Grevers LC, Jeanson J, Noël D, Casteilla L, Jorgensen C, van den Berg W, van Lent PL. Antiinflammatory and chondroprotective effects of intraarticular injection of adipose-derived stem cells in experimental osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(11):3604–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Genemaras AA, Ennis H, Bradshaw B, Kaplan L, Huang CC. Effects of anti-inflammatory agents on expression of early responsive inflammatory and catabolic genes in ex vivo porcine model of acute knee cartilage injury. Cartilage. 2018;9(3):293–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Al Faqeh H, Nor Hamdan BM, Chen HC, Aminuddin BS, Ruszymah BH. The potential of intra-articular injection of chondrogenic-induced bone marrow stem cells to retard the progression of osteoarthritis in a sheep model. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(6):458–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Singh A, Goel SC, Gupta KK, Kumar M, Arun GR, Patil H, Kumaraswamy V, Jha S. The role of stem cells in osteoarthritis: an experimental study in rabbits. Bone Joint Res. 2014;3(2):32–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Bostan B, Gevrek F, Balta O, Aytekin K, Asci M, Eren MB, Kuyucu YE. Effects of different bone marrow stimulation techniques on avascular zone meniscal defects. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2018;119(10):630–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Guo W, Xu W, Wang Z, Chen M, Hao C, Zheng X, Huang J, Sui X, Yuan Z, Zhang Y, Wang M, Li X, Wang Z, Peng J, Wang A, Wang Y, Liu S, Lu S, Guo Q. Cell-free strategies for repair and regeneration of meniscus injuries through the recruitment of endogenous stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:5310471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Li Z, Wu N, Cheng J, Sun M, Yang P, Zhao F, Zhang J, Duan X, Fu X, Zhang J, Hu X, Chen H, Ao Y. Biomechanically, structurally and functionally meticulously tailored polycaprolactone/silk fibroin scaffold for meniscus regeneration. Theranostics. 2020;10(11):5090–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Ruprecht JC, Waanders TD, Rowland CR, Nishimuta JF, Glass KA, Stencel J, DeFrate LE, Guilak F, Weinberg JB, McNulty AL. Meniscus-derived matrix scaffolds promote the integrative repair of meniscal defects. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Liu Z, Tang M, Zhao J, Chai R, Kang J. Looking into the future: toward advanced 3D biomaterials for stem-cell-based regenerative medicine. Adv Mater. 2018;30(17):e1705388.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Vermeulen S, Honig F, Vasilevich A, Roumans N, Romero M, Dede Eren A, Tuvshindorj U, Alexander M, Carlier A, Williams P, Uquillas J, de Boer J. Expanding biomaterial surface topographical design space through natural surface reproduction. Adv Mater. 2021;33(31):2102084.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Maihoefer J, Madry H, Rey-Rico A, Venkatesan JK, Goebel L, Schmitt G, Speicher-Mentges S, Cai X, Meng W, Zurakowski D, Menger MD, Laschke MW, Cucchiarini M. Hydrogel-guided, rAAV-mediated IGF-I overexpression enables long-term cartilage repair and protection against perifocal osteoarthritis in a large-animal full-thickness chondral defect model at one year in vivo. Adv Mater. 2021;33(16):2008451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFF0301105 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant IDs: 81630064 and 81871786).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yixin Bian and Han Wang have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    Yixin Bian, Han Wang & Xisheng Weng

  2. Department of Medical Genetics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China

    Xiuli Zhao

Authors
  1. Yixin Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Han Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiuli Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xisheng Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YB and XW contributed to the conception of the study. YB and HW searched and analyzed the literature. YB wrote the manuscript. XZ and XW revised the manuscript critically. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiuli Zhao or Xisheng Weng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bian, Y., Wang, H., Zhao, X. et al. Meniscus repair: up-to-date advances in stem cell-based therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther 13, 207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02863-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02863-7

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512