Skip to main content
Download PDF

lncRNA SNHG1 regulates odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells via miR-328-3p/Wnt/β-catenin pathway

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 13, Article number: 311 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Elucidating the mechanism of odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) is the key to in-depth mastery and development of regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs). In odontogenic differentiation, lncRNAs have a regulatory role. The goal of this research is to determine the involvement of short nucleolar RNA host gene 1 (SNHG1) in hDPSCs’ odontogenic differentiation and the mechanism that underpins it.

Methods

hDPSCs were isolated from the dental pulp tissue of healthy immature permanent teeth. Follow-up experiments were performed when the third generation of primary cells were transfected. The proliferation ability was measured by CCK-8. The biological effects of SNHG1 and miR-328-3p were determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blot (WB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and activity, alizarin red S staining (ARS) and quantification, and immunofluorescence staining. The binding of SNHG1 and miR-328-3p was confirmed using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. qRT-PCR and WB were used to determine whether the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway was activated.

Results

On the 0th, 3rd, and 7th days of odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs, SNHG1 showed a gradual up-regulation trend. SNHG1 overexpression enhanced the mRNA and protein expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), dentine matrix protein 1 (DMP-1) and ALP. We found that SNHG1 could bind to miR-328-3p. miR-328-3p inhibited the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. Therefore, miR-328-3p mimics rescued the effect of SNHG1 overexpression on promoting odontogenic differentiation. In addition, SNHG1 inhibited Wnt/β-catenin pathway via miR-328-3p in odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs.

Conclusion

lncRNA SNHG1 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin pathway through miR-328-3p and then promotes the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs.

Introduction

Recently, regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) have become an important method in treating young permanent teeth with pulp and periapical diseases [1]. In the treatment, stem cells derived from tooth differentiate into various functional cells after activation and then form root and dental pulp-dentin complex-like structures [2]. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs), one of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with high proliferation, self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation potential, can be differentiated into odontoblasts and contribute to the formation of dentin and dental pulp-dentin complex [3]. Although a few mechanisms by which stem cells derived from tooth differentiate into odontoblasts have been discovered, it has not yet been fully revealed [4].

Non-coding RNA with a length greater than 200 nucleotides is called long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). lncRNA is a by-product of RNA polymerase II transcription. Its gene conservation is lower than mRNA encoding protein, but its promoter region and splicing site are highly conserved. Therefore, the expression of lncRNA at a specific time and location is of great importance [5, 6]. The small endogenous non-coding RNA single-stranded molecule with a length of usually 20–24 nucleotides is called microRNA (miRNA), which is mainly observed in the cytoplasm and almost completely regulates protein expression by interacting with messenger RNA (mRNA) [7]. lncRNA located in the cytoplasm can base-pair with miRNA and effectively consume them, thereby affecting mRNA expression [8].

Small nucleolar RNA host genes (SNHGs) are a category of long non-coding RNAs found in the nucleus and cytoplasm that regulate gene expression at several levels, including transcription, alternative splicing, and post-translational regulation [9]. According to reports, small nucleolar RNA host gene 1 (SNHG1) can affect the development of osteosarcoma by regulating miR-101-3p, miR-326, miR-577 [10,11,12] and can influence the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells via miR-154-5p [13]. These studies indicate that SNHG1 can exert its function by competitively binding to miRNAs. At the same time, SNHG1 can regulate the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) and periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), respectively [14,15,16]. Furthermore, up-regulation of SNHG1 is detected during the differentiation of human dental pulp cells into odontoblast-like cells [17]. We can hypothesize that SNHG1 may affect the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs.

Here, the impact of SNHG1 on odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs is discussed, as well as a part of its mechanism as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA). Our findings reveal that SNHG1 can boost the odontogenic differentiation ability of hDPSCs by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through miR-328-3p.

Methods

Cell culture

The Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University School of Stomatology gave clearance to this study. After obtaining the patient’s informed consent in the Department of Oral Surgery of Jiangsu Provincial Stomatological Hospital, we collected orthodontic reduction premolars from healthy donors under 16 years old. The pulp tissue was carefully isolated from immature roots, rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, Life Technologies, USA), sliced, and then incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator with 3 mg/ml collagenase type I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The tissue block and separated cells were collected after 30 min of digestion by centrifugation at 1000 r/min for 5 min. They were inoculated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator with the complete alpha minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Gibco, Life Technologies, USA) containing 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; ScienCell Research Laboratories, California, USA). Every three days, the medium was changed. When the cells have reached 70–80% confluence, they are trypsin digested and passaged at a 1:3 ratio. Cells from stage 3 to passage 5 were utilized in the subsequent experiments.

Flow cytometry

In order to identify the phenotype of hDPSCs, flow cytometry was applied to detect MSCs’ surface markers. According to the instructions, the cells at passage 3 were incubated with anti-human CD90, CD73, CD29, CD34, and CD45 fluorescent antibodies (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA).

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and staining

Transfected hDPSCs were planted in a 12-well plate and grown for 7 days in mineralization induction medium. The quantitative analysis of ALP activity was performed using an alkaline phosphatase detection kit (Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) in accordance with the instructions. After 30 min of fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde, ALP staining was conducted with the BCIP/NBT staining kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China).

Alizarin red S staining (ARS) and quantification

The transfected hDPSCs grown for 14 days in mineralization induction media, with the medium changing every three days. Before being stained with Alizarin Red S (Leagene Biotechnology, Beijing, China), the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The mineralized nodules were seen and photographed using an inverted microscope. The staining profile was scanned using the scanner. To quantify ARS, 10 percent cetylpyridinium chloride was utilized, and the OD value was measured at 562 nm absorbance. Calcium levels were normalized to total protein levels in each group.

Stem cell multidirectional differentiation

hDPSCs were inoculated onto 6-well plates and grown in full medium to 80 percent confluence and above for odontogenic and adipogenic differentiation. 2 weeks after induction with odontogenic differentiation induction medium (10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 10 nM dexamethasone (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States) diluted in 10% FBS α-MEM), the cells were identified with ARS. After 21–30 days of cell culture using OriCell® hDPSCs Adipogenic Differentiation Kit (Cyagen Biosciences, Guangzhou, China), Oil Red O staining was for cell identification. For chondrogenic differentiation, the right amounts of cells were cultured in a 15 ml conical centrifuge tube with OriCell® Human BMMSCs Chondrogenic Differentiation Kit (Cyagen Biosciences, Guangzhou, China) for 1–2 days to form cartilage ball. The cartilage ball was carefully inoculated into a 48-well plate for 21 days after induction, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, frozen sectioned and identified by Alcian blue staining.

Quantitative reverse transcription -polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total cell RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, New York, NY, USA), and concentration quantification and purity detection were performed with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Then HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used to synthesize cDNA. Finally, ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used for quantification. Table 1 lists the primer sequences that were employed. For miRNA, cDNA was reverse transcribed by stem-loop primers and miRNA 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). U6 was used for miRNA standardization, whereas GAPDH was utilized to normalize mRNA and lncRNA expression. The relative expression levels were determined using the 2−ΔΔCT method. In comparison with the control condition, the findings were reported as fold changes.

Table 1 Primer sequences
Full size table

Cell transfection

SNHG1 overexpressed virus and specific siRNA, has-miR-328-3p mimics and inhibitor are all prepared by GenePharma (Shanghai, China) (Sequences in Additional file 1). hDPSCs were inoculated overnight and infected with lentivirus in the presence of polybrene (5 μg/mL) for 16–24 h. siRNA, mimics and inhibitors were transiently transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, New York, NY, USA) in serum-free medium for 6 h and then replaced with complete medium.

Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

The proliferation activity of hDPSCs was detected with CCK-8 (Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan). The transfected cells were planted at a density of 2000 cells per well on a 96-well culture plate. At particular time points (day 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7), 1:9 ratios of CCK-8 reagent and α-MEM were injected into each well. OD value was determined using a microplate reader at 450 nm absorbance after 2 h of incubation.

Western blot

The total protein was extracted from the cells by protein lysate. On 10% SDS-PAGE gels, equal quantities of proteins were isolated and then transferred to 0.22 m polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). After being blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 h, the membranes were incubated with the following antibodies overnight at 4 °C: GAPDH (Proteintech, 10,494–1-AP), DSPP (Bioword, BS71212), DMP-1 (Affinity, DF8825, RRID: AB_2842022), ALP (Abcam, ab95462), Axin1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #2087), β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, #8480), Active β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, #19,807). The membranes were incubated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and then exposed using the Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). The protein bands were subsequently quantified with Image J software.

Immunofluorescence staining

The transfected hDPSCs were grown to an adequate density on glass coverslips in 12-well plate. The cells were rinsed in PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. After washing with PBS, the cells were perforated with 0.25% Triton-100 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 12 min and blocked with goat serum at 4 °C overnight. Then, the coverslips were incubated with DSPP and DMP-1 primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The coverslips were overlaid with the fluorescent dye-labeled secondary antibody and kept in dark at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the glass coverslips were covered with the anti-fluorescence quencher agent containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and then photographed under an inverted fluorescence microscope. ImageJ software was used for semi-quantitative analysis.

Dual-Luciferase reporter assay

293 T cells were seeded to 70 percent to 80 percent confluence in a 24-well plate. Wild-type or mutant SNHG1 luciferase plasmids, as well as negative control or miR-328-3p mimics, were co-transfected into 293 T. Luciferase activity of Renilla and firefly was measured 24 h after transfection, depending on Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, United States). The light intensity from firefly luciferase is normalized by Renilla luciferase.

Statistical analysis

Data from three independent experiments were analyzed by GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and represented the mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD). The Social Science Statistical Package (SPSS) software (version 26.0) was used for statistical analysis. To compare the differences between groups, the Student’s t test was implemented. P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.

Results

Characterization of hDPSCs

The hDPSCs were successfully isolated from the collected immature permanent teeth, which were adherent cells with a spindle-shaped morphology (Fig. 1A, B). The surface markers of the isolated hDPSCs were characterized using flow cytometry. The results revealed that these cells expressed CD29, CD73, and CD90 while negatively expressing CD34 and CD45 (Fig. 1C), indicating that they were MSCs. Alizarin red, oil red O, and Alcian blue staining were used to validate the isolated hDPSCs' capacity to differentiate into osteo/odontogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic cells, respectively (Fig. 1D–F).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cultivation and characterization of hDPSCs. A Primary hDPSCs at day 3. Scale bar = 100 μm. B hDPSCs at passage 3. Scale bar = 100 μm. C Flow cytometry analysis showing negative expression of CD34 and CD45 and positive expression of CD29, CD73 and CD90 in hDPSCs. D-F Multiple differentiations of hDPSCs. Alizarin red staining assayed osteo/odontogenic differentiation. Scale bar = 100 μm. Oil red O staining assayed adipogenic differentiation. Scale bar = 50 μm. Alcian blue staining assayed chondrogenic differentiation. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

SNHG1 expression increases in hDPSCs during the odontogenic differentiation, and SNHG1 promotes odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs

To verify whether SNHG1 is involved in odontogenic differentiation, we detected the expression of SNHG1 and odontogenic differentiation marker genes (dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), dentine matrix protein 1 (DMP-1) and ALP) during the differentiation of hDPSCs into odontoblasts (Fig. 2A). The results showed that odontogenic induction elevated the expression of SNHG1 in hDPSCs considerably.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SNHG1 expression in hDPSCs during the odontogenic differentiation and SNHG1 governs the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. A Relative ALP, DMP-1, DSPP and SNHG1 expressions were measured by qRT-PCR at day 0, 3, and 7 under the mineralization induction condition. GAPDH was used for normalization. B The transfection efficacy of SNHG1 was measured by qRT-PCR in SNHG1 group and si-SNHG1 group, with GAPDH as a control. C The proliferation ability of hDPSCs was measured by CCK-8. D-G After SNHG1 overexpression or silence, relative ALP, DMP-1 and DSPP expression were measured by qRT-PCR and ALP, DMP-1 and DSPP expression were measured by Western blot at day 5 under the mineralization induction condition. H At 7 days after odontogenic induction, hDPSCs were performed with ALP staining and activity. I On the 14th day, Alizarin Red staining and quantification were performed. J The expression of DMP-1 and DSPP in transfected hDPSCs were also showed by Immunofluorescence Staining. Scale bar = 20 μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

We performed cell transfection to construct SNHG1 silenced and overexpressed in hDPSCs to study the role of SNHG1 in odontogenic differentiation. qRT-PCR study validated the transfection effect (Fig. 2B). To begin, the CCK-8 assay revealed that SNHG1 overexpression had no effect on the proliferation of hDPSCs (Fig. 2C). There was the same result between si-NC group and si-SNHG1 group (Fig. 2C). The mRNA and protein expression of DSPP, DMP-1, and ALP in the SNHG1 group were considerably up-regulated after five days of culture using mineralization induction media, compared to the NC group (Fig. 2D, E). The similar trends were seen in ALP staining and activity, ARS and immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 2H–J). SNHG1 overexpression increased the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs, according to these findings. On the contrary, si-NC and si-SNHG1 groups demonstrated that silencing SNHG1 could inhibit the tendency (Fig. 2F–J). In a nutshell, SNHG1 promoted odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs.

SNHG1 can bind to miR-328-3p and affects its expression

SNHG1 has been found in the nucleus and cytoplasm, and it can regulate multiple biological processes via the ceRNA mechanism [13, 18]. Using LncBase Predicted v.2 in the DIANA tool and StarBase v2.0, we looked for prospective miRNAs targeting SNHG1 [19, 20]. Combined with the results retrieved from the literature that miR-328-3p has significant changes in osteogenic lineage differentiation [21, 22], it was speculated that miR-328-3p might target SNHG1 during odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. After miR-328-3p mimics and inhibitor were transfected into hDPSCs, we checked the transfection effectiveness of them (Fig. 3A). SNHG1 expression was suppressed by miR-328-3p (Fig. 3B). SNHG1 could potentially act as a negative regulator of miR-328-3p expression (Fig. 3C). The luciferase activity of the wild-type SNHG1 reporter gene was considerably decreased by miR-328-3p mimics, and the predicted binding site mutation successfully reversed the previous inhibition (Fig. 3D, E). The above results proved the direct binding between SNHG1 and miR-328-3p.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SNHG1 acts as a ceRNA for miR-328-3p. A The transfection efficacy of miR-328-3p mimics and inhibitor was verified by qRT-PCR. B The expression of SNHG1 was regulated by miR-328-3p. C SNHG1 can also govern the expression of miR-328-3p. D The dual-luciferase reporter assay was conducted in 293 T cells. The luciferase activities of the wild-type or Mutant SNHG1 reporter gene were detected after 24 h of co-transfection with mimics NC or miR-328-3p mimics. The light intensity from firefly luciferase is normalized by Renilla luciferase. E The potential binding sites of SNHG1 and miR-328-3p predicted by the biological prediction software and the site changes in mutant SNHG1. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

miR-328-3p inhibits odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs

miR-328-3p was overexpressed and knocked down utilizing miR-328-3p mimics and inhibitor. mNC, mimics, iNC, and inhibitor were the four groups of transfected cells. After five days of culture in the mineralization induction medium, overexpression of miR-328-3p inhibited the mRNA and protein expression of DSPP, DMP-1 and ALP, whereas downregulation of miR-328-3p boosted the expression of odontogenic differentiation marker genes (Fig. 4A–D). Immunofluorescence staining further confirmed that miR-328-3p mimics could hinder odontogenic differentiation, and miR-328-3p inhibitors can promote this process (Fig. 4G). In the mimics group, ALP activity, ALP staining, and ARS were all reduced, but in the inhibitor group, they were all increased(Fig. 4E, F). In summary, miR-328-3p inhibited odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

MiR-328-3p effects the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. A-D After cell transfection of miR-328-3p mimics and inhibitor, relative ALP, DMP-1 and DSPP expression and ALP, DMP-1 and DSPP expression were measured by qRT-PCR and Western blot on the 5th day of mineralization induction. E, F On the 7th day of mineralization induction, ALP staining and activity were performed to determine the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. Similarly, Alizarin Red staining and quantification were performed on the 14th day. Scale bar = 100 μm. G Immunofluorescence Staining showed different expression levels of DMP-1 and DSPP in transfected hDPSCs. Scale bar = 20 μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

miR-328-3p partially mediates SNHG1's pro-odontogenic action

We transfected miR-328-3p mimics into stably expressing SNHG1 hDPSCs and cultivated them with mineralization induction medium to determine whether the pro-odontogenic effect of SNHG1 was mediated by miR-328-3p. Exogenous miR-328-3p partially rescued the mRNA and protein expression of odontogenic differentiation marker genes in hDPSCs overexpressing SNHG1 (Fig. 5A, B). In addition, this tendency was also detected in ALP activity (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5
figure 5

miR-328-3p partially mediates the pro-odontogenic function of SNHG1. A, B Exogenous miR-328-3p partially rescued the mRNA and protein expression of ALP, DMP-1 and DSPP in the hDPSCs overexpressing SNHG1. C miR-328-3p also rescued the up-regulation of ALP activity caused by SNHG1 overexpression. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

SNHG1 inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin pathway via competitively binding miR-328-3p in the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs

It has been confirmed that miR-328-3p can regulate the Axin1/β-catenin cascade[23]. Therefore, we detected Axin1 expression and Axin1/β-catenin cascade protein expression in hDPSCs during odontogenic differentiation. Down-regulated Axin1 and up-regulated β-catenin were discovered in mimics group (Fig. 6A, B), while the opposite in inhibitor group (Fig. 6C, D). These findings indicated that miR-328-3p inhibited Axin1 protein expression to up-regulate Wnt/β-catenin pathway. We hypothesized that SNHG1 would regulate Axin1 protein production via miR-328-3p, hence adjusting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. To verify this, we detected Axin1 expression and the protein levels of Axin1/β-catenin cascade in si-NC, si-SNHG1, NC, SNHG1, SNHG1 + mNC, and SNHG1 + mimics groups, respectively (Fig. 6E–J). The results demonstrated that overexpression of SNHG1 enhanced Axin1 mRNA and protein levels in hDPSCs, but the promotion effect was neutralized after co-transfection with miR-328-3p mimics. β-catenin protein expression was the opposite. In conclusion, SNHG1 is linked to Wnt/β-catenin pathway through miR-328-3p.

Fig. 6
figure 6

SNHG1 regulates Wnt/β-catenin pathway via competitively binding miR-328-3p in the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. A-D After miR-328-3p was overexpressed, Axin1 was down-regulated at the gene and protein level, thereby promoting Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which manifests as an up-regulation of (active) β-catenin. After miR-328-3p was silent, there were opposite effects. E–H SNHG1 had opposite effects on Axin1, Axin1 and (active) β-catenin expression, compared with miR-328-3p. I Western blot analysis indicated that the miR-328-3p mimics rescued the SNHG1 mediated up-regulation of Axin1 and (active) β-catenin. J qPCR validated western blot results of Axin1 at the gene level. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

Regenerative endodontics uses the concept of tissue engineering to regenerate the pulp-dentin complex of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp due to infection, trauma or developmental abnormalities [24]. Stem cells are a critical factor in the regeneration of dental pulp tissue engineering [25]. Exploring the processes of hDPSCs' odontogenic differentiation would thus aid in the advancement of this technology. This study found that SNHG1 up-regulates Axin1 through miR-328-3p, thereby inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin pathway to promote the differentiation of hDPSCs.

Recent study has connected lncRNAs to the odontogenic differentiation of dental tissue-derived MSCs [4]. For instance, through epigenetic control of DLX3 by the H19/SAHH axis, lncRNA H19 regulates hDPSCs odontogenic differentiation [26]. lncRNA CALB2 is also a sponge for miR-30b-3p, which promotes odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs by up-regulating RUNX2 [27]. SNHG1, which belongs to the non-coding RNA family that carries snoRNA [9], can control the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs [14,15,16], but its involvement in odontogenic differentiation is unknown.

The effect of SNHG1 on the proliferation and differentiation of hDPSCs was investigated in this study. Above our findings revealed that SNHG1 had no impact on the proliferation of hDPSCs. This is distinct from the research results related to cancer cells, revealing that the regulatory effect of SNHG1 on cell proliferation is complicated [10,11,12,13]. As shown in the results, the overexpression of SNHG1 positively regulates hDPSCs’ odontogenic differentiation, while SNHG1 negatively regulates MSCs’ osteogenic differentiation in other studies [14, 15]. On the one hand, this may be due to different cell lineages for experiments. On the other hand, although the mechanisms of osteogenic and odontogenic differentiation are similar, there are still certain differences [28].

SNHG1 is expressed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus, according to several studies, indicating the variety of SNHG1 functions [9, 13, 29]. In the cytoplasm, SNHG1 can act as a microRNA sponge [30, 31]. Our evidence shows that miR-328-3p partially mediates the pro-odontogenic function of SNHG1. Only a tiny amount of literature previously stated that miR-328-3p could alter osteogenic differentiation in osteoporosis, and there are inadequate investigations on it in cell differentiation [21, 22]. An emerging study has confirmed that miR-328-3p can rescue damaged MSCs in osteogenesis [23].

Then we looked into the mechanism by which miR-328-3p controls hDPSCs’ odontogenic differentiation. We searched related research and discovered that Axin1 is regulated by miR-328-3p in mouse MSCs, and it also participates in and negatively regulates the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway [32,33,34]. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is important for MSCs’ differentiation [35]. We speculated that SNHG1 could bind miR-328-3p to inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, thereby promoting the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. The results confirmed that overexpression of miR-328-3p could activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and SNHG1 combined with miR-328-3p attenuated the promotion of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. However, the effect of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway on the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs has different opinions in the existing studies [17, 36]. This inconsistency may be linked to Wnt activity level, cell source and experimental conditions. Furthermore, the actual mechanism of miR-328-3p acting on Wnt/β-catenin and how Wnt/β-catenin functions in odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs remain uncertain that have to be researched further. The canonical Wnt/β-catenin signal has been demonstrated to boost osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by directly stimulating the expression of Runx2 [37]. Runx2 inhibits the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts [38, 39]. Therefore, we can speculate that Wnt/β-catenin pathway may directly stimulate Runx2 expression to inhibit the terminal odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs, which needs experiments to prove.

In general, highly simulated in vivo animal experiments are required to reflect the therapeutic implications of basic research. At present, according to the formation position of the dental pulp tissue, the animal models of regenerative dental pulp therapy can be divided into: ectopic, semiorthotopic, and orthotopic[40]. Among them, the ectopic and semiorthotopic regeneration models of mice may be less suitable for our experiments, as the presence of mouse blood and cells in the model would interfere with the study on the mechanism between miR-328-3p and Wnt/β-catenin [41]. The orthotopic regeneration models can better simulate the conditions of regenerative endodontic procedures, and there is no problem of mouse gene interference, which is conducive to the subsequent in vivo experiments [41,42,43].

Conclusion

In short, lncRNA SNHG1 inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through miR-328-3p and then promotes the odontogenic differentiation of hDPSCs. Our findings provide a theoretical foundation for the practical use of REPs.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

REPs:

Regenerative endodontic procedures

hDPSCs:

Human dental pulp stem cells

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

lncRNA:

Long non-coding RNA

miRNA:

MicroRNA

mRNA:

Messenger RNA

SNHGs:

Small nucleolar RNA host genes

SNHG1:

Small nucleolar RNA host gene 1

BMMSCs:

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

PDLSCs:

Periodontal ligament stem cells

ceRNA:

Competitive endogenous RNA

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

α-MEM:

Alpha minimum essential medium

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction

CCK-8:

Cell Counting Kit-8

WB:

Western Blot

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ARS:

Alizarin Red S staining

DSPP:

Dentin sialophosphoprotein

DMP-1:

Dentine matrix protein 1

References

  1. Jung C, Kim S, Sun T, Cho YB, Song M. Pulp-dentin regeneration: current approaches and challenges. J Tissue Eng. 2019;10:2041731418819263.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang GT, Gronthos S, Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res. 2009;88(9):792–806.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nuti N, Corallo C, Chan BM, Ferrari M, Gerami-Naini B. Multipotent Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells: a Literature Review. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2016;12(5):511–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang F, Zhang K, Chen Z, Wu B. Noncoding RNAs: new insights into the odontogenic differentiation of dental tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):297.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tye CE, Gordon JA, Martin-Buley LA, Stein JL, Lian JB, Stein GS. Could lncRNAs be the missing links in control of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation? J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(3):526–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitz SU, Grote P, Herrmann BG. Mechanisms of long noncoding RNA function in development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(13):2491–509.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bridges MC, Daulagala AC, Kourtidis A. LNCcation: lncRNA localization and function. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(2).

  9. Zimta AA, Tigu AB, Braicu C, Stefan C, Ionescu C, Berindan-Neagoe I. An emerging class of long non-coding RNA with oncogenic role arises from the snoRNA host genes. Front Oncol. 2020;10:389.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng R, Zhang J, Chen J. lncRNA SNHG1 negatively regulates miRNA-101-3p to enhance the expression of ROCK1 and promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion in osteosarcoma. Int J Mol Med. 2019;43(3):1157–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang Z, Jiang C, Fang J. Up-regulated lnc-SNHG1 contributes to osteosarcoma progression through sequestration of miR-577 and activation of WNT2B/Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):238–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Cao L, Wu J, Wang Q. Long non-coding RNA SNHG1 regulates NOB1 expression by sponging miR-326 and promotes tumorigenesis in osteosarcoma. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(1):77–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu M, Chen X, Lin K, Zeng K, Liu X, Pan B, et al. The long noncoding RNA SNHG1 regulates colorectal cancer cell growth through interactions with EZH2 and miR-154-5p. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang Y, Wu W, Jiao G, Chen Y, Liu H. LncRNA SNHG1 modulates p38 MAPK pathway through Nedd4 and thus inhibits osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Life Sci. 2019;228:208–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Guo X, Wu S. Epigenetic silencing of KLF2 by long non-coding RNA SNHG1 inhibits periodontal ligament stem cell osteogenesis differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):435.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiang J, Fu HQ, Xu Z, Fan WJ, Liu F, Chen B. lncRNA SNHG1 attenuates osteogenic differentiation via the miR-101/DKK1 axis in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Med Rep. 2020;22(5):3715–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen L, Song Z, Huang S, Wang R, Qin W, Guo J, et al. lncRNA DANCR suppresses odontoblast-like differentiation of human dental pulp cells by inhibiting wnt/β-catenin pathway. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;364(2):309–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li B, Li A, You Z, Xu J, Zhu S. Epigenetic silencing of CDKN1A and CDKN2B by SNHG1 promotes the cell cycle, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):823.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paraskevopoulou MD, Vlachos IS, Karagkouni D, Georgakilas G, Kanellos I, Vergoulis T, et al. DIANA-LncBase v2: indexing microRNA targets on non-coding transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D231–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li JH, Liu S, Zhou H, Qu LH, Yang JH. starBase v2.0: decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D92-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weilner S, Skalicky S, Salzer B, Keider V, Wagner M, Hildner F, et al. Differentially circulating miRNAs after recent osteoporotic fractures can influence osteogenic differentiation. Bone. 2015;79:43–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen J, Li K, Pang Q, Yang C, Zhang H, Wu F, et al. Identification of suitable reference gene and biomarkers of serum miRNAs for osteoporosis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36347.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu D, Kou X, Chen C, Liu S, Liu Y, Yu W, et al. Circulating apoptotic bodies maintain mesenchymal stem cell homeostasis and ameliorate osteopenia via transferring multiple cellular factors. Cell Res. 2018;28(9):918–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim SG, Malek M, Sigurdsson A, Lin LM, Kahler B. Regenerative endodontics: a comprehensive review. Int Endod J. 2018;51(12):1367–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gong T, Heng BC, Lo EC, Zhang C. Current advance and future prospects of tissue engineering approach to dentin/pulp regenerative therapy. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:9204574.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng L, Sun S, Han D, Liu Y, Liu H, Feng H, et al. Long non-coding RNA H19/SAHH axis epigenetically regulates odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. Cell Signal. 2018;52:65–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tu S, Wu J, Chen L, Tian Y, Qin W, Huang S, et al. LncRNA CALB2 sponges miR-30b-3p to promote odontoblast differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells via up-regulating RUNX2. Cell Signal. 2020;73:109695.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Svandova E, Peterkova R, Matalova E, Lesot H. Formation and developmental specification of the odontogenic and osteogenic mesenchymes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:640.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams GT, Farzaneh F. Are snoRNAs and snoRNA host genes new players in cancer? Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(2):84–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li J, Zhang Z, Xiong L, Guo C, Jiang T, Zeng L, et al. SNHG1 lncRNA negatively regulates miR-199a-3p to enhance CDK7 expression and promote cell proliferation in prostate cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;487(1):146–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu Q, Shan S, Li Y, Zhu D, Jin W, Ren T. Long noncoding RNA SNHG1 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression by up-regulating MTDH via sponging miR-145-5p. FASEB J. 2018;32(7):3957–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo W, Lin SC. Axin: a master scaffold for multiple signaling pathways. Neurosignals. 2004;13(3):99–113.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salahshor S, Woodgett JR. The links between axin and carcinogenesis. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(3):225–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim S, Jho EH. The protein stability of Axin, a negative regulator of Wnt signaling, is regulated by Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 (Smurf2). J Biol Chem. 2010;285(47):36420–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ling L, Nurcombe V, Cool SM. Wnt signaling controls the fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Gene. 2009;433(1–2):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gong Y, Yuan S, Sun J, Wang Y, Liu S, Guo R, et al. R-spondin 2 induces odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem/progenitor cells via regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Front Physiol. 2020;11:918.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, Bhat RA, Bodine PV, Komm BS, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(39):33132–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li S, Kong H, Yao N, Yu Q, Wang P, Lin Y, et al. The role of runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) in the late stage of odontoblast differentiation and dentin formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;410(3):698–704.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Miyazaki T, Kanatani N, Rokutanda S, Yoshida C, Toyosawa S, Nakamura R, et al. Inhibition of the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts and their transdifferentiation into osteoblasts in Runx2 transgenic mice. Arch Histol Cytol. 2008;71(2):131–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nakashima M, Iohara K, Bottino MC, Fouad AF, Nör JE, Huang GT. Animal models for stem cell-based pulp regeneration: foundation for human clinical applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25(2):100–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu X, Liu J, Yu Z, Chen CA, Aksel H, Azim AA, et al. A miniature swine model for stem cell-based de novo regeneration of dental pulp and dentin-like tissue. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018;24(2):108–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Torabinejad M, Faras H, Corr R, Wright KR, Shabahang S. Histologic examinations of teeth treated with 2 scaffolds: a pilot animal investigation. J Endod. 2014;40(4):515–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nakashima M, Iohara K. Mobilized dental pulp stem cells for pulp regeneration: initiation of clinical trial. J Endod. 2014;40(4 Suppl):S26-32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Scientific Research Fund of National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (201502002).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tingting Fu and Yiran Liu contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China

    Tingting Fu, Yiran Liu, Xin Huang, Yan Guo, Jiaping Shen & Hong Shen

Authors
  1. Tingting Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yiran Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiaping Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hong Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TF and YL performed study design, data collection, and drafted the manuscript. XH participated in the design of the study and the writing of the manuscript. YG participated in the collection and compilation of data. HS contributed to the conception and design and critically revised the manuscript. JS carried out the surveys, provided financial support and study material, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiaping Shen or Hong Shen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Studies were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and got the approval of the Ethical Committee of Nanjing Medical University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: The sequences of siRNA, mimics and inhibitor

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, T., Liu, Y., Huang, X. et al. lncRNA SNHG1 regulates odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells via miR-328-3p/Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther 13, 311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02979-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02979-w

Keywords

  • lncRNA SNHG1
  • Odontogenic differentiation
  • hDPSCs
  • miR-328-3p
  • Wnt/β-catenin

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512