Skip to main content
Download PDF

Electromagnetic fields regulate calcium-mediated cell fate of stem cells: osteogenesis, chondrogenesis and apoptosis

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 133 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are increasing in popularity as a safe and non-invasive therapy. On the one hand, it is widely acknowledged that EMF can regulate the proliferation and differentiation of stem cells, promoting the undifferentiated cells capable of osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and chondroblast differentiation to achieve bone repair purpose. On the other hand, EMF can inhibit tumor stem cells proliferation and promote apoptosis to suppress tumor growth. As an essential second messenger, intracellular calcium plays a role in regulating cell cycle, such as proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. There is increasing evidence that the modulation of intracellular calcium ion by EMF leads to differential outcomes in different stem cells. This review summarizes the regulation of channels, transporters, and ion pumps by EMF-induced calcium oscillations. It furtherly discusses the role of molecules and pathways activated by EMF-dependent calcium oscillations in promoting bone and cartilage repair and inhibiting tumor stem cells growth.

Introduction

Since the late nineteenth century, electromagnetic wave has been proved to exist in the physical field. With the advancement of EMF researches, Reiter R, Persinger MA, Frey AH and others have summarized the biological effects and applications of electromagnetic fields in the late twentieth century [1,2,3]. On this basis, Electromagnetic fields therapy has gradually been accepted and widely valued. Electromagnetic field has been active in clinical treatment and research applications as a versatile therapeutic expert for nearly 50 years, such as bone repair [4], treatment of osteoarthritis [5], treatment of degenerative nerve diseases [6] and tumor suppression [7], etc. The initiating mechanism for the complex bioregulatory effects of electromagnetic fields on different tissues and cells is still unclear, and this paper suggests that intracellular calcium ion may play a key role (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cascades of EMF-induced calcium ion. Electromagnetic fields stimulation induces calcium oscillations in stem cells, and activation of calcium ion after endocytosis can activate multiple downstream signaling pathways that promote stem cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation or chondrogenic differentiation[18, 20, 40, 70, 71, 74, 79]. The figure was created with BioRender.com

Full size image

Intracellular calcium homeostasis is closely related to cell fate, such as proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, apoptosis, etc. [8]. In most cases, calcium homeostasis is achieved through calcium channels in cell membranes, receptors and intracellular calcium dynamics [9]. When cells are subjected to external mechanical stimulation, voltage-gated ion channels in the cell membrane open and intracellular calcium ion concentration rises [10]. The calcium ion concentration is about 100 nM in a resting-state and rises to about 1000 nM in an activated state. Hence the upregulated calcium ion activates various calcium-sensitive cascade reactions, such as calmodulin (CaM), cAMP, NOS, Ins (1,4,5) P3, which regulate cell metabolism through a complex network [11].

This review focuses on EMF—which can be used as a non-invasive treatment for a wide variety of cells—and on how it induces different cell fates by regulating calcium ion. As a biomechanical stimulus, EMF is able to exert its biomagnetic effects by generating peak currents through non-thermal effects that alter the peak or spatial distribution of intracellular calcium ion concentrations through stimulation over minutes to hours [12,13,14]. We summarize latest therapeutic cases of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELE-EMF) and radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) applied to a variety of cell types, such as stem cells, osteoblasts, and tumor cells (Table 1). Interestingly, by regulating intracellular calcium ion, EMF promotes normal stem cells in the body proliferation and differentiation, but inhibits tumor stem cells proliferation and promotes apoptosis. The contrasting effects of EMF on normal and tumor stem cells are likely to be related to the abnormalities of the tumor stem cells' own calcium ion channels [15].

Table 1 EMF therapeutic cases
Full size table

EMF

EMF as a therapeutic versatile has been carried out in a large number of in vivo, in vitro and clinical trials [4, 25,26,27]. After conducting a large number of EMF-related in vitro experiments, our group combined EMF, stem cells, and bone tissue engineering into an organic whole, and we still achieved the repair of bone defects in a variety of animals in a more complex in vivo physiological environment compared to the relatively single, controlled environment of in vitro experiments [16, 17, 28]. To be able to better simulate the in vivo experimental environment, Sundelacruz [29] constructed a three-dimensional (3D) in vitro tissue model of trauma, in which the mineralization of osteoblasts was enhanced by EMF stimulation, recreating the process of bone regeneration. Based on the current research, the therapeutic EMFs are diverse, with pulsed and sinusoidal EMFs being common depending on the EMF waveform; researchers have also used complex combinations of parameters, ranging from very low frequency EMFs that induce osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells [17, 20], to radio frequency EMFs that inhibit tumor proliferation [21, 22]. During the treatment, we need to control the intensity of ELE-EMF, and when high intensity stimulation is used, the cells receive more energy, which may lead to the inhibition of cell growth and metabolism [30], implying that the electromagnetic field intensity is also an important parameter in regulating EMF effects. Based on the current study, we believe that for low or extremely low frequency EMF, frequencies in the range of 0–75 Hz and intensities in the range of 0–1 mT have osteogenic or chondrogenic biological effects, while EMF with this combination of parameters are safe for adults but prohibited for children [31], and if the electromagnetic field intensity is further increased, it may be necessary to reduce the stimulation time to ensure safety [20]. For RF EMF, these two frequencies, 27.12 MHz and 835 MHz, have biological effects for the treatment of tumors [21, 32], and no adverse effects have been reported yet.

The biological mechanisms by which EMF promote cell differentiation and apoptosis are diverse. In the initial studies, researchers suggested that EMF can directly regulate intracellular proteins or transition metal ions in enzymes to affect enzyme activity and thus regulate biochemical reactions [33]. And another part of the study suggested that EMF can regulate non-coding RNAs to further activate intracellular signaling cascade pathways [34, 35]. As the study of EMF has intensified, the mechanisms of biological effects of EMF have been divided into two main categories, namely, thermal and nonthermal effects of EMF. Although these two theories differ in the initiating factors, with the former relying on heat generated by EMF and the latter being the sum of all modes of action unrelated to magneto-thermal, both focus their researches on the effects of EMF on intracellular metal ions and ion channels opening and closing [36,37,38]. Despite the fact that EMF parameters are characterized by diversity and complexity, several studies have pointed out that EMF can modulate intracellular calcium oscillations [22, 39, 40].

Mechanism of electromagnetic fields-induced calcium ion oscillations

Electromagnetic fields, as a specific biomechanical stimulus, is widely recognized to alter membrane potential, activate calcium channels, increase their activity, and as a result, cause calcium oscillations [41, 42]. After receiving biomechanical stimulation, cells can alter intracellular calcium concentration through a variety of membrane-dependent pathways: (1) Activation of L-type or T-Type voltage-gated ion channels by increasing channel activity and protein expression levels [43, 44]. (2) Activation of the purinergic receptor family on the cell membrane is activated, where mechanical signaling receptors on the cell membrane are activated, causing the ATP or ADP increases, and the purinergic signal can upregulate the expression of P2Y1 receptors [45, 46]. (3) Activation of the TRP family of cation channels, TRPV4, which exhibits moderate permeability to calcium ion, is activated to alter the permeability of the cell membrane and promote the inward flow of calcium ion [47, 48]. (4) It also activates its cation channels or proteins on the cell membrane, such as the electromagnetic perceptive gene (EPG) is able to highly express a transmembrane protein that regulates the flow of calcium ion in response to electromagnetic fields stimulus [49]. Real-time confocal imaging enables the observation of a calcium peak in cells within minutes after stimulation, and when the energy of stimulation is further increased, more cells show an activated state while the amplitude of the calcium peak increases further [50, 51]. We summarize the calcium channels, receptors and transporters regulated by EMF (Table 2).

Table 2 EMF-induced calcium oscillations
Full size table

Calcium ion oscillations induced by EMF can be achieved by two classical calcium inward currents, the first through L-type or T-type voltage-gated channels, where the stimulation of electromagnetic fields can open ion channels located on the cell membrane, allowing the inward flow of extracellular calcium ion [55]. In the second, EMF can alter intracellular calcium ion concentrations independently of calcium ion channels on the cell membrane, causing calcium ion oscillations [57], a change that is likely due to EMF affecting intracellular calcium stores and the release of calcium ion from intracellular calcium pool [58]. The endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria are the main storage organelles for calcium ion, and calcium ion are released from the inter-membrane space membrane into the cytoplasm during calcium oscillations, transiently or by maintaining elevated calcium ion concentrations [59,60,61]. After 10 min EMF stimulation of myocytes, TRPC1 channel expression is upregulated, mitochondrial respiratory capacity is enhanced, and cellular metabolism is increased [52]. Mitochondria are also able to regulate calcium ion concentration in the cellular matrix via IP3 [62], but no EMFs have been reported to be associated with this (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Types of EMF-induced calcium oscillations. Electromagnetic fields can activate ion channels to promote calcium inward flow and also regulate intracellular calcium pools, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria to cause calcium oscillations. The figure was created with BioRender.com

Full size image

Different calcium channels in the cell membrane are capable of responding to a variety of stimuli from the external environment, and there are various calcium channels such as mechanical force-sensitive, voltage-sensitive, and temperature-sensitive. EMF is capable of activating calcium channels through both thermal and non-thermal effects, and it has been debated which of these two effects plays the more dominant role, but the calcium oscillations induced by EMF are inextricably linked to magnetic nanoparticles [63, 64]. Among the non-thermal effects of EMF, researchers have suggested that EMF has a penetrating effect and is able to exert a mechanical force stimulus on cells, while calcium channels sensitive to mechanical forces exist in the cell membrane, and these calcium channels can be activated by external mechanical forces, causing calcium ion inward flows [65]. The mechanical force of EMF depends on other magnetic ions inside or outside the cell, such as ferromagnetic nanoparticles or ferritin [63]. The administration of ferromagnetic nanoparticles from outside the cell under the action of EMF can be observed by calcium ion fluorescence with a 20% signal enhancement and an increase in the peak frequency of calcium ion oscillations, which are not significantly affected when changing the temperature of the extracellular environment [66]. Iron oxide nanoparticles are superparamagnetic and can respond to the mechanical force of the external EMF, and if iron oxide nanoparticles are combined with other intracellular proteins, both are subjected to the mechanical force of the EMF simultaneously [67]. In the presence of EMF, endogenous ferritin nanoparticles link with a camelid anti-GFP-transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 fusion protein, aGFP- TRPV1, causing calcium oscillations [63]. Unlike the non-thermal effect of EMF, EMF activates calcium channels through magneto-thermal interaction, when the EMF raises the temperature of magnetic nanoparticles, activating the temperature-sensitive TRV1 calcium channel and causing calcium ion inward flows [64]. An important mediator of the EMF-induced calcium ion oscillation is the superparamagnetic nanoparticles.

Application of EMF in stem cells and its regulation of calcium ion pathway

Bone repair effects of EMF

Extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields have been more widely recognized as a means to promote bone repair and have been validated several times in the treatment of animal fractures or bone defects, including the promotion of stem cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic differentiation [68, 69]. Our research team [53] found that ELE-EMF can induce calcium oscillations in bone marrow stem cells, up-regulated calcium ion activates FAK pathway, cytoskeleton enhancement, and migration ability of stem cells in vitro is enhanced. On this basis, we grew rat stem cells on PCL/HA scaffolds, and the combined application of ELE-EMF and vascular endothelial growth factor activated β-catenin and promoted the osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis of rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [16].

In the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, the pERK and Wnt/β-catenin pathways play important roles, and calcium ion have a significant effect on both pathways in the differentiation regulated by electromagnetic fields [18, 70]. EMF can open volt-gated channels on stem cells and promote calcium ion inward flow [71, 72], thus promoting stem cells toward osteogenesis. However, the way in which calcium ion act on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway may be more complex, involving interactions between calcium ion and the cellular cilia system [73]. It has been shown [74] that the ability of EMF to activate the Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling pathway to promote osteogenic differentiation of cells depends on the functional integrity of primary cilia in osteoblasts. When primary cilia were inhibited using small interfering RNA (siRNA), the Wnt10b /β-catenin signaling pathway was no longer activated, and the ability of electromagnetic field to promote osteogenic differentiation was significantly diminished [75]. We suggest that after EMF activation of calcium channels, the interaction of calcium ion with cellular primary cilia further activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and promotes stem cells toward osteogenic differentiation, but the specific mechanisms involved need further investigation.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in the metabolic regulation as a star molecule [76]. Arthur [77] first documented the ability to produce NO after EMF stimulation of cells, by using a NO selective membrane electrode, and in further experiments used W-7, an inhibitor of CaM, which inhibited NO production. The production of NO is closely related to the intracellular calcium ion concentration and has a close relationship, as the calcium ion concentration increases, the cells produce NO [78]. NO produced by EMF, which also acts as a messenger molecule, further activates cGMP and PKG pathways, with a significant upregulation of ALP expression in cells and cellular differentiation toward osteogenesis [79]. EMF-mediated, calcium-dependent elevation of NO not only promotes osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, but also attenuates the inflammatory response and promotes wound healing and cartilage repair [80, 81].

Cartilage repair by electromagnetic fields

The pro-differentiation and repair effects of EMF are not limited to contributing to bone differentiation; in different culture environments, stem cells exhibit the potential to differentiate into different cell types [19, 82]. In the chondrogenic environment, stem cells receive various physical stimuli and the synergistic effects of multiple ion channels and receptors promote the inward flow of calcium ion [83]. EMF may activate calcium channels other than voltage-gated calcium channels, and although there are relatively few reports of electromagnetic activation of purinergic receptors and TRP family of cation channels to further influence calcium oscillations, both may play an important role in EMF against inflammation and cartilage in osteoarthritis. Purinergic receptors play a key role in the development of cartilage as important molecular receptors that are widely present on the membranes of mesenchymal stem cells, chondrocytes, skeletal muscle cells, and other cells that receive purinergic signals [84]. Purinergic receptors can be divided into two major categories, P1 and P2 receptors, and it has been demonstrated that electromagnetic fields can upregulate the expression of Adenosine Receptors, with significant upregulation of A2A and A3, exerting similar effects as adenosine receptor agonists, and can downregulate PGE(2) levels to achieve control of osteoarthritis [85, 86]. We found that EMF can upregulate P2X7 receptors in MSCs [40], and that the adenosine purinergic system acts as a classical regulatory pathway affecting the intracellular calcium ion homeostasis during the process of chondrogenic differentiation of cells [84].

It is the purinergic receptors and TRP family of cation channels which are sensitive to external mechanical or electrical signal stimuli that form the bridge between electromagnetic fields and changes in intracellular calcium ion concentration [87]. Purinergic receptors are functionally cation channels and are very sensitive to calcium ion that maintain intracellular calcium homeostasis within MSCs [84]. During cartilage formation, intracellular cascade reactions are sensitive to changes in calcium ion concentration [88]. In response to EMF stimulation, TGFβ expression is upregulated in stem cells, promoting stem cell differentiation toward chondrogenesis [89, 90]. In the process of chondrogenic differentiation, calcium ion have a crucial role in the activation of TGFβ [84, 91]. Although the relationship between the action of calcium ion and TGFβ under EMF conditions has not been reported, we speculate that TGFβ may be a downstream molecule of EMF-mediated calcium ion oscillation.

Cenk found that there is an orientation-dependent electromagnetic field for chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells, and in vitro cultured stem cells, electromagnetic field stimulation in the Z-axis direction is most favorable for the opening of TRPC1 receptors on stem cells and the inward flow of extracellular calcium ion. The inward flow of calcium ion promoted the phosphorylation of FAK, which further activated the ERK signaling pathway [20]. After this, intracellular expression of chondrogenic markers such as SOX9, COL2A1, and ACAN were significantly upregulated and cells differentiated toward chondrogenesis [92].

Calcium ion, as a second messenger to regulate physiological activities of cells, are closely related to mitochondria and ROS [93, 94]. Current studies suggest that excessive cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), can damage cells, causing varying degrees of inhibition of phosphatase expression in cascade reactions [95, 96], or more severely, leading to the destruction of mitochondria causing cell death [97], while, on the contrary, moderate amounts of ROS can regulate normal cellular physiological processes [98, 99]. Stimulation of stem cells by EMF generates a small amount of ROS to further activate EGFR signaling to induce differentiation of MSCs [100], while ROS produced by NADPH oxidase is indispensable in the differentiation process of primary chondrocytes [101]. Based on the current study, we hypothesize that the electromagnetic field-mediated calcium ion oscillations, which causes a small amount of ROS production in mitochondria, regulates the chondrogenic differentiation of cells, but further studies are needed to prove the exact mechanism.

Electromagnetic field for tumor treatment

More and more studies have started to focus on the physiotherapy of tumors. Early knowledge of physiotherapy rested on the effects of thermal effects of physical stimuli on cells [102], but with the development and depth of research, it was gradually recognized that non-thermal effects can activate voltage-gated channels, a physiological process that plays an important role. Physical therapy can make cell membrane and mitochondrial membrane potential exhibit a hyperpolarized state, with a significant increase in intracellular calcium ion concentration and a concomitant increase in the concentration of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide [103]. The imbalance of calcium ion homeostasis and disruption of mitochondria allow for an alteration of the tumor stem cells cycle, inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis [104, 105]. EMF, as a widely noticed physical therapy, is able to modulate the voltage-gated channels of tumor stem cells through non-thermal effects, and the opening of CACNA1H channels allows a large amount of calcium ion inward flow, which eventually leads to the differentiation of HCC cells into quiescent cells with spindle-shaped morphology [22]. Meanwhile, RF-EMF was able to suppress tumor stem cells by activating the CAMKII/p38 MAPK signaling pathway after inducing calcium ion oscillation and by inhibiting the β-catenin/HMGA2 signaling pathway [21].

Interestingly, the effect of electromagnetic fields is not limited to tumor stem cells, but also inhibits the proliferation and development of tumor cells [106]. It has been shown that breast cancer cell lines exposed to ELE-EMF for 24 h showed a significant increase in intracellular ROS expression and an increased sensitivity to further radiotherapy [107]. Also breast cancer cell lines, after exposure to higher intensity EMF radiation, showed a significant increase in intracellular calcium ion and reactive oxygen species, which eventually led to necroptosis, while this programmed necrosis of tumor cells was able to be antagonized by the calcium blocker verapamil or the free radical scavenger n -acetylcysteine [23].

Biosafety of electromagnetic fields

The two-sided nature of the action of EMF inevitably raises concerns about their safety, and their therapeutic and tumor-causing effects have been controversial [108]. Some researchers have proposed the hypothesis that EMFs cause an imbalance in ion homeostasis, leading to local inflammation or tumorigenesis [38], which means that very low frequency or radiofrequency EMFs can exert biological effects while irregularly opening multiple ion channels (Na+, K+ and Ca2+) [109,110,111], causing an imbalance in intracellular ion homeostasis and producing excessive OS/ROS leading to DNA damage [112, 113], but this postulation lacks direct experimental evidence and necessary epidemiological investigations. For normal animals, exposure of animals to 1.5 mT at 50 Hz intensity had no significant adverse effects [114]. In nearly 50 years of research, only low-frequency EMF has been confirmed as a risk factor for pediatric leukemia, and epidemiological studies have shown that ELE-EMF is not a risk factor for breast cancer or cardiovascular disease, and according to the current studies, there is not enough evidence to show that electromagnetic fields pose a health threat to adults [31, 115,116,117] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Epidemiological investigation results. According to epidemiological findings Electromagnetic fields may be a risk factor for cancer in children, but there is no evidence of cancer in adults. EMF is safe and reliable as a non-invasive treatment for adults. The figure was created with BioRender.com

Full size image

High-frequency electromagnetic waves are closely related to modern communication in daily life, and therefore research related to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and human health has been ongoing [118, 119]. Although it has been suggested that when the frequency of EMF reaches 1800 MHz, this high-energy EMF radiation causes chromosomal alterations in the nucleus of cells [120], its cytotoxicity and gene damage toxicity are harmful [121], potentially increasing the risk of reproductive cancers [122]. However, there is not enough evidence in epidemiological statistics to be able to suggest that high-frequency EMFs are a high-risk factor for tumorigenesis [123].

It has been shown that electromagnetic fields promote apoptosis in tumor cells such as B16-BL6 mouse melanoma cells, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, BT-20, and MCF-7 human breast and HeLa cervical cancer cells, but do not affect non-malignant cells [124]. Tumor cells have a large number of variants in their calcium channels compared to normal cells, and these variants lead to abnormal biological behavior of tumor cells [15]. Electromagnetic fields are able to open voltage-gated channels in the cell membrane, causing an imbalance of calcium ion, which affects tumor proliferation and promotes apoptosis [105, 125]. This radiofrequency EMF has high energy and certain penetration, and the therapeutic principle of radiofrequency EMF is to cause excessive or irregular opening of ion channels thus causing ion imbalance and excessive production of ROS which in turn leads to DNA damage, and the question that remains is whether this mechanism acts on normal cells.

Discussion

As research continues, EMF combined with stem cells have also been shown to be used in the treatment of osteoporosis [126], soft tissue injuries such as rotator cuff [127] and inhibition of tumor development [128]. At the same time, the relationship between EMF and tumors has become a controversial topic [119], but there is little epidemiological basis for the carcinogenicity of EMF, in contrast to sophisticatedly designed experiments demonstrating the pro-apoptotic ability of EMF on tumor stem cells [129].We believe that the two-sided ability of EMF to promote stem cells differentiation and tumor stem cells apoptosis is due to three reasons: first, EMF as an energy field promotes the opening of ion channels and the inward flow of calcium ion when we use lower frequencies and appropriate intensities [20, 53, 54], and causes calcium overload when the electromagnetic field intensity or frequency is further increased [21,22,23,24], second, EMF can regulate multiple ions in cells, and calcium ion play a key role [92, 130], calcium ion acts as a second messenger that can activate downstream molecules such as NO, ROS [77, 100, 102, 106], which further regulate cell differentiation or apoptosis through the β-catenin pathway; thirdly, the variation of calcium channels in tumor stem cells themselves, which makes the regulation of EMF polarized [131] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Electromagnetic fields-dependent calcium-mediated stem cell and tumor cell fate. EMF mediates calcium ion oscillation in stem cells, and calcium ion activate NO molecules, which further activate the osteogenic differentiation pathway and promote osteogenic differentiation of stem cells; calcium ion can activate a small amount of ROS molecules, which further activate the chondrogenic differentiation pathway and promote chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. EMF causes calcium overload in tumor cells and a large amount of ROS activation, leading to apoptosis. The figure was created with BioRender.com

Full size image

Specifically, this difference in biological effects is closely related to the electromagnetic field parameters, the cell culture environment and the type of activated ion channels. When low or extremely low frequency EMF is selected, i.e. frequencies between 0 and 75 Hz and intensities between 0 and 1 mT, EMF is able to exert osteogenic or chondrogenic effects. In this case, a corresponding cell culture environment is also required. Furtherly, the EMF activates different types of calcium channels. In the osteogenic environment, EMF primarily activates voltage-gated calcium channels to promote osteogenic differentiation. Besides, in the chondrogenic environment, EMF mainly activates receptor-like cation channels, such as purinergic receptors or several members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel family [84,85,86]. In general, after the activation of these ion channels, intracellular calcium ion concentrations will rise and downstream proteins of multiple cascade reactions regulated [84]. RF EMF with frequencies of 27.12 MHz and 835 MHz have a therapeutic biological effect on tumors. The overexpressed calcium channels in tumor cells can be hyperactivated by these high energy EMF, thus resulting an imbalance in calcium homeostasis, which then causes a DNA damage through ROS overexpression and an ultimate apoptosis [21, 32, 129]. However, it is noted that low-frequency EMF should not be used among children, because EMF can lead to the development of pediatric leukemia [31]. Meanwhile, we need to prevent damage to surrounding tissues from RF EMF due to its excessive energy [115].

The biological effects of EMF are mainly mediated through calcium channels, but in the cell membrane, there are multiple voltage-gated types of ion channels (Na+, K+ and Ca2+, etc.), and EMF have a modulatory effect on these ion channels, therefore, the possibility of EMF mediating biochemical reactions through these ion channels has attracted interest [38]. Under the induction of ELF-EMF, researchers have successfully recorded the alteration of Na+ and K+ currents in cell membranes using the cell membrane clamp technique [111]. EMF have now been found to affect a variety of potassium channels (A-type K+, delayed rectifier K+, M-type K+, fast-inactivating transient (IK, A), and dominant-sustained (IK, V) channels) [132]. EMF-mediated alterations in potassium currents may cause physiological and pathological changes in cellular metabolism, immune regulation, inflammation, or tumors, but further mechanisms are unclear.

Conclusion

In this paper, we summarize the applications of EMF in combination with stem cells based on existing studies and point out that EMF with different parameters in different cell culture environments can mediate stem cells towards different cell fates, osteogenic differentiation, chondrogenic differentiation or apoptosis. We suggest that EMF induces calcium oscillations through non-thermal effects directly on superparamagnetic nanoparticles, and in MSCs, upregulation of calcium ion regulates proliferation and differentiation. In contrast, in tumor stem cells, excessive activation of calcium ion channels by EMF leads to drastic changes in calcium homeostasis, which eventually leads to apoptosis. We further summarize the downstream molecules of EMF-induced calcium oscillations and elucidate their biosafety. We hope that this review will provide hints for further studies on EMF, stem cells and calcium ion to find more efficient superparamagnetic nanoparticles that can better integrate EMF with tissue engineering and more effectively solve clinical problems related to bone repair, cartilage repair and bone tumors.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

EMF:

Electromagnetic fields

ELE-EMF:

Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields

RF-EMF:

Radio frequency electromagnetic fields

PEMF:

Pulsed electromagnetic fields

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

BMSCs:

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

ADSCs:

Adipose Derived Stem Cells

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

NO:

Nitric oxide

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

CaM:

Calmodulin

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

VGCC:

Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

PCL:

Polycaprolactone

CMC:

Carboxymethyl cellulose

HA:

Hydroxyapatite

References

  1. Reiter R. Effects of atmospheric and extra-terrestrial electromagnetic and corpuscular radiations on living organisms. Int J Biometeorol. 1972;16(Suppl):217–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Persinger MA, Ludwig HW, Ossenkopp KP. Psychophysiological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields: a review. Percept Mot Skills. 1973;36(3):1139–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frey AH. Differential biologic effects of pulsed and continuous electromagnetic fields and mechanisms of effect. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974;238:273–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science (New York, NY). 1974;184(4136):575–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Markoll R. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine. Report of randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(10):1903–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arendash GW. Review of the evidence that transcranial electromagnetic treatment will be a safe and effective therapeutic against Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;53(3):753–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller AB, Morgan LL, Udasin I, Davis DL. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102). Environ Res. 2018;167:673–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berridge MJ. The inositol trisphosphate/calcium signaling pathway in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(4):1261–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4(7):517–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaub BM, Kasuba KC, Mace E, Strittmatter T, Laskowski PR, Geissler SA, et al. Neurons differentiate magnitude and location of mechanical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(2):848–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1(1):11–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan Y, Laurencin CT. Fracture repair with ultrasound: clinical and cell-based evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Regalbuto E, Anselmo A, De Sanctis S, Franchini V, Lista F, Benvenuto M, et al. Human fibroblasts in vitro exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous and pulsed wave signals: evaluation of biological effects with a multimethodological approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):7069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Golbach LA, Portelli LA, Savelkoul HFJ, Terwel SR, Kuster N, de Vries RBM, et al. Calcium homeostasis and low-frequency magnetic and electric field exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Environ Int. 2016;92–93:695–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Monteith GR, McAndrew D, Faddy HM, Roberts-Thomson SJ. Calcium and cancer: targeting Ca2+ transport. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(7):519–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen J, Tu C, Tang X, Li H, Yan J, Ma Y, et al. The combinatory effect of sinusoidal electromagnetic field and VEGF promotes osteogenesis and angiogenesis of mesenchymal stem cell-laden PCL/HA implants in a rat subcritical cranial defect. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li W, Huang C, Ma T, Wang J, Liu W, Yan J, et al. Low-frequency electromagnetic fields combined with tissue engineering techniques accelerate intervertebral fusion. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YM, Lim HM, Lee EC, Ki GE, Seo YK. Synergistic effect of electromagnetic fields and nanomagnetic particles on osteogenesis through calcium channels and p-ERK signaling. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(8):1633–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapourzadeh A, Atyabi S-M, Irani S, Bakhshi H. Osteoinductivity of polycaprolactone nanofibers grafted functionalized with carboxymethyl chitosan: Synergic effect of β-carotene and electromagnetic field. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;150:152–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Celik C, Franco-Obregón A, Lee EH, Hui JH, Yang Z. Directionalities of magnetic fields and topographic scaffolds synergise to enhance MSC chondrogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2021;119:169–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma S, Wu S-Y, Jimenez H, Xing F, Zhu D, Liu Y, et al. Ca and CACNA1H mediate targeted suppression of breast cancer brain metastasis by AM RF EMF. EBioMedicine. 2019;44:194–208.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jimenez H, Wang M, Zimmerman JW, Pennison MJ, Sharma S, Surratt T, et al. Tumour-specific amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields induce differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting Ca3.2 T-type voltage-gated calcium channels and Ca influx. EBioMedicine. 2019;44:209–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barati M, Javidi MA, Darvishi B, Shariatpanahi SP, Mesbah Moosavi ZS, Ghadirian R, et al. Necroptosis triggered by ROS accumulation and Ca(2+) overload, partly explains the inflammatory responses and anti-cancer effects associated with 1 Hz, 100 mT ELF-MF in vivo. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;169:84–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cios A, Ciepielak M, Stankiewicz W, Szymański Ł. The influence of the extremely low frequency electromagnetic field on clear cell renal carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barker AT, Dixon RA, Sharrard WJ, Sutcliffe ML. Pulsed magnetic field therapy for tibial non-union. Interim results of a double-blind trial. Lancet. 1984;1(8384):994–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daish C, Blanchard R, Fox K, Pivonka P, Pirogova E. The Application of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) for bone fracture repair: past and perspective findings. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(4):525–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saliev T, Mustapova Z, Kulsharova G, Bulanin D, Mikhalovsky S. Therapeutic potential of electromagnetic fields for tissue engineering and wound healing. Cell Prolif. 2014;47(6):485–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Y, Tao C, Zhao D, Li F, Zhao W, Wu H. EMF acts on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to promote differentiation to osteoblasts and to inhibit differentiation to adipocytes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31(4):277–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sundelacruz S, Li C, Choi YJ, Levin M, Kaplan DL. Bioelectric modulation of wound healing in a 3D in vitro model of tissue-engineered bone. Biomaterials. 2013;34(28):6695–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yan J, Dong L, Zhang B, Qi N. Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic field on growth and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Electromagn Biol Med. 2010;29(4):165–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marwick C. EMF exposure study rules out “causing” cancer, finds “association” with leukemia puzzling but real. JAMA. 1996;276(21):1705–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim JH, Sohn UD, Kim H-G, Kim HR. Exposure to 835 MHz RF-EMF decreases the expression of calcium channels, inhibits apoptosis, but induces autophagy in the mouse hippocampus. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018;22(3):277–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shao T. EMF-cancer link: the ferritin hypothesis. Med Hypotheses. 1993;41(1):28–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aalami Zavareh F, Abdi S, Entezari M. Up-regulation of miR-144 and miR-375 in the human gastric cancer cell line following the exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2021;97(9):1324–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lamkowski A, Kreitlow M, Radunz J, Willenbockel M, Stiemer M, Fichte LO, et al. Analyzing the impact of 900 MHz EMF short-term exposure to the expression of 667 miRNAs in human peripheral blood cells. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pall ML. Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health. Environ Res. 2018;164:405–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Georgiou CD, Margaritis LH. Oxidative stress and NADPH oxidase: connecting electromagnetic fields, cation channels and biological effects. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18):10041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Yakymenko I, Chrousos GP. Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (review). Int J Oncol. 2021;59(5):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wei J, Sun J, Xu H, Shi L, Sun L, Zhang J. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on intracellular calcium transients in cardiomyocytes. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015;34(1):77–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y, Li W, Liu C, Yan J, Yuan X, Wang W, et al. Electromagnetic field treatment increases purinergic receptor P2X7 expression and activates its downstream Akt/GSK3β/β-catenin axis in mesenchymal stem cells under osteogenic induction. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jenrow KA, Zhang X, Renehan WE, Liboff AR. Weak ELF magnetic field effects on hippocampal rhythmic slow activity. Exp Neurol. 1998;153(2):328–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pall ML. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(8):958–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cai K, Jiao Y, Quan Q, Hao Y, Liu J, Wu L. Improved activity of MC3T3-E1 cells by the exciting piezoelectric BaTiO/TC4 using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(11):4073–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Buckner CA, Buckner AL, Koren SA, Persinger MA, Lafrenie RM. Inhibition of cancer cell growth by exposure to a specific time-varying electromagnetic field involves T-type calcium channels. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0124136.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yoon CW, Lee NS, Koo KM, Moon S, Goo K, Jung H, et al. Investigation of ultrasound-mediated intracellular Ca(2+) oscillations in HIT-T15 pancreatic β-cell line. Cells. 2020;9(5):1129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Alvarenga EC, Rodrigues R, Caricati-Neto A, Silva-Filho FC, Paredes-Gamero EJ, Ferreira AT. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound-dependent osteoblast proliferation occurs by via activation of the P2Y receptor: role of the P2Y1 receptor. Bone. 2010;46(2):355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sonkusare SK, Bonev AD, Ledoux J, Liedtke W, Kotlikoff MI, Heppner TJ, et al. Elementary Ca2+ signals through endothelial TRPV4 channels regulate vascular function. Science (New York, NY). 2012;336(6081):597–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liao WH, Hsiao MY, Kung Y, Liu HL, Béra JC, Inserra C, et al. TRPV4 promotes acoustic wave-mediated BBB opening via Ca(2+)/PKC-δ pathway. J Adv Res. 2020;26:15–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hwang J, Choi Y, Lee K, Krishnan V, Pelled G, Gilad AA, et al. Regulation of electromagnetic perceptive gene using ferromagnetic particles for the external control of calcium ion transport. Biomolecules. 2020;10(2):308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hu M, Lee W, Jiao J, Li X, Gibbons DE, Hassan CR, et al. Mechanobiological modulation of in situ and in vivo osteocyte calcium oscillation by acoustic radiation force. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1460(1):68–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tsukamoto A, Higashiyama S, Yoshida K, Watanabe Y, Furukawa KS, Ushida T. Stable cavitation induces increased cytoplasmic calcium in L929 fibroblasts exposed to 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 2011;51(8):982–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yap JLY, Tai YK, Fröhlich J, Fong CHH, Yin JN, Foo ZL, et al. Ambient and supplemental magnetic fields promote myogenesis a TRPC1-mitochondrial axis: evidence of a magnetic mitohormetic mechanism. FASEB J. 2019;33(11):12853–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang Y, Yan J, Xu H, Yang Y, Li W, Wu H, et al. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields promote mesenchymal stem cell migration by increasing intracellular Ca(2+) and activating the FAK/Rho GTPases signaling pathways in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Li Y, Yan X, Liu J, Li L, Hu X, Sun H, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic field enhances brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression through L-type voltage-gated calcium channel- and Erk-dependent signaling pathways in neonatal rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurochem Int. 2014;75:96–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang MH, Jian MW, Tai YH, Jang LS, Chen CH. Inhibition of B16F10 cancer cell growth by exposure to the square wave with 7.83+/-0.3 Hz involves L- and T-type calcium channels. Electromagn Biol Med. 2021;40(1):150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cui Y, Liu X, Yang T, Mei Y-A, Hu C. Exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields inhibits T-type calcium channels via AA/LTE4 signaling pathway. Cell Calcium. 2014;55(1):48–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Luo FL, Yang N, He C, Li HL, Li C, Chen F, et al. Exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields alters the calcium dynamics of cultured entorhinal cortex neurons. Environ Res. 2014;135:236–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Morabito C, Rovetta F, Bizzarri M, Mazzoleni G, Fanò G, Mariggiò MA. Modulation of redox status and calcium handling by extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields in C2C12 muscle cells: a real-time, single-cell approach. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48(4):579–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Verkhratsky A. Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium store in the endoplasmic reticulum of neurons. Physiol Rev. 2005;85(1):201–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Csordás G, Weaver D, Hajnóczky G. Endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial contactology: structure and signaling functions. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28(7):523–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Calvo-Rodriguez M, Bacskai BJ. Mitochondria and calcium in Alzheimer’s disease: from cell signaling to neuronal cell death. Trends Neurosci. 2021;44(2):136–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kang SS, Han K-S, Ku BM, Lee YK, Hong J, Shin HY, et al. Caffeine-mediated inhibition of calcium release channel inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor subtype 3 blocks glioblastoma invasion and extends survival. Cancer Res. 2010;70(3):1173–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Stanley SA, Sauer J, Kane RS, Dordick JS, Friedman JM. Remote regulation of glucose homeostasis in mice using genetically encoded nanoparticles. Nat Med. 2015;21(1):92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rosenfeld D, Senko AW, Moon J, Yick I, Varnavides G, Gregureć D, et al. Transgene-free remote magnetothermal regulation of adrenal hormones. Sci Adv. 2020;6(15):eaaz3734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tay A, Di Carlo D. Magnetic nanoparticle-based mechanical stimulation for restoration of mechano-sensitive ion channel equilibrium in neural networks. Nano Lett. 2017;17(2):886–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Tay A, Kunze A, Murray C, Di Carlo D. Induction of calcium influx in cortical neural networks by nanomagnetic forces. ACS Nano. 2016;10(2):2331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Johnsen S, Lohmann KJ. The physics and neurobiology of magnetoreception. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(9):703–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Azadian E, Arjmand B, Khodaii Z, Ardeshirylajimi A. A comprehensive overview on utilizing electromagnetic fields in bone regenerative medicine. Electromagn Biol Med. 2019;38(1):1–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tamrin SH, Majedi FS, Tondar M, Sanati-Nezhad A, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM. Electromagnetic fields and stem cell fate: when physics meets biology. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2016;171:63–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wu S, Yu Q, Lai A, Tian J. Pulsed electromagnetic field induces Ca-dependent osteoblastogenesis in C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells through the Wnt-Ca/Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503(2):715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Petecchia L, Sbrana F, Utzeri R, Vercellino M, Usai C, Visai L, et al. Electro-magnetic field promotes osteogenic differentiation of BM-hMSCs through a selective action on Ca(2+)-related mechanisms. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13856.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Cooper DM, Mons N, Karpen JW. Adenylyl cyclases and the interaction between calcium and cAMP signalling. Nature. 1995;374(6521):421–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Saternos H, Ley S, AbouAlaiwi W. Primary cilia and calcium signaling interactions. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):7109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhou J, Gao Y-H, Zhu B-Y, Shao J-L, Ma H-P, Xian CJ, et al. Sinusoidal electromagnetic fields increase peak bone mass in rats by activating Wnt10b/β-catenin in primary cilia of osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(7):1336–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yan J-L, Zhou J, Ma H-P, Ma X-N, Gao Y-H, Shi W-G, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote osteoblast mineralization and maturation needing the existence of primary cilia. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;404:132–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Jeremy JY, Rowe D, Emsley AM, Newby AC. Nitric oxide and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43(3):580–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pilla AA. Electromagnetic fields instantaneously modulate nitric oxide signaling in challenged biological systems. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;426(3):330–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Archer SL, Cowan NJ. Measurement of endothelial cytosolic calcium concentration and nitric oxide production reveals discrete mechanisms of endothelium-dependent pulmonary vasodilatation. Circ Res. 1991;68(6):1569–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Cheng G, Zhai Y, Chen K, Zhou J, Han G, Zhu R, et al. Sinusoidal electromagnetic field stimulates rat osteoblast differentiation and maturation via activation of NO-cGMP-PKG pathway. Nitric Oxide. 2011;25(3):316–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Patruno A, Amerio P, Pesce M, Vianale G, Di Luzio S, Tulli A, et al. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields modulate expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, endothelial nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in the human keratinocyte cell line HaCat: potential therapeutic effects in wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(2):258–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Fitzsimmons RJ, Gordon SL, Kronberg J, Ganey T, Pilla AA. A pulsing electric field (PEF) increases human chondrocyte proliferation through a transduction pathway involving nitric oxide signaling. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(6):854–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Chen C-H, Lin Y-S, Fu Y-C, Wang C-K, Wu S-C, Wang G-J, et al. Electromagnetic fields enhance chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells in a chondrogenic microenvironment in vitro. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(5):647–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Uzieliene I, Bernotas P, Mobasheri A, Bernotiene E. The role of physical stimuli on calcium channels in chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):2998.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Matta C, Fodor J, Csernoch L, Zákány R. Purinergic signalling-evoked intracellular Ca(2+) concentration changes in the regulation of chondrogenesis and skeletal muscle formation. Cell Calcium. 2016;59(2–3):108–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ongaro A, Varani K, Masieri FF, Pellati A, Massari L, Cadossi R, et al. Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and adenosine receptors modulate prostaglandin E(2) and cytokine release in human osteoarthritic synovial fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227(6):2461–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. De Mattei M, Varani K, Masieri FF, Pellati A, Ongaro A, Fini M, et al. Adenosine analogs and electromagnetic fields inhibit prostaglandin E2 release in bovine synovial fibroblasts. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(2):252–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Barrett-Jolley R, Lewis R, Fallman R, Mobasheri A. The emerging chondrocyte channelome. Front Physiol. 2010;1:135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Cancedda R, Castagnola P, Cancedda FD, Dozin B, Quarto R. Developmental control of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Int J Dev Biol. 2000;44(6):707–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Aaron RK, Wang S, Ciombor DM. Upregulation of basal TGFbeta1 levels by EMF coincident with chondrogenesis–implications for skeletal repair and tissue engineering. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(2):233–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Motoyama M, Deie M, Kanaya A, Nishimori M, Miyamoto A, Yanada S, et al. In vitro cartilage formation using TGF-beta-immobilized magnetic beads and mesenchymal stem cell-magnetic bead complexes under magnetic field conditions. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92(1):196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Oca P, Zaka R, Dion AS, Freeman TA, Williams CJ. Phosphate and calcium are required for TGFbeta-mediated stimulation of ANK expression and function during chondrogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2010;224(2):540–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kavand H, van Lintel H, Renaud P. Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic fields tuned to the ion cyclotron resonance frequency of Ca(2+) on chondrogenic differentiation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(5):799–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Feno S, Butera G, Vecellio Reane D, Rizzuto R, Raffaello A. Crosstalk between calcium and ROS in pathophysiological conditions. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:9324018.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Brookes PS, Yoon Y, Robotham JL, Anders MW, Sheu S-S. Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287(4):C817–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Koundouros N, Poulogiannis G. Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt signaling and redox metabolism in cancer. Front Oncol. 2018;8:160.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Lee K, Esselman WJ. Inhibition of PTPs by H(2)O(2) regulates the activation of distinct MAPK pathways. Free Radical Biol Med. 2002;33(8):1121–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Rizwan H, Pal S, Sabnam S, Pal A. High glucose augments ROS generation regulates mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis via stress signalling cascades in keratinocytes. Life Sci. 2020;241:117148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Zorov DB, Juhaszova M, Sollott SJ. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(3):909–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Zorov DB, Krasnikov BF, Kuzminova AE, Vysokikh M, Zorova LD. Mitochondria revisited. Alternative functions of mitochondria. Biosci Rep. 1997;17(6):507–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Park J-E, Seo Y-K, Yoon H-H, Kim C-W, Park J-K, Jeon S. Electromagnetic fields induce neural differentiation of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells via ROS mediated EGFR activation. Neurochem Int. 2013;62(4):418–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Kim KS, Choi HW, Yoon HE, Kim IY. Reactive oxygen species generated by NADPH oxidase 2 and 4 are required for chondrogenic differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(51):40294–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Pall ML. Scientific evidence contradicts findings and assumptions of Canadian Safety Panel 6: microwaves act through voltage-gated calcium channel activation to induce biological impacts at non-thermal levels, supporting a paradigm shift for microwave/lower frequency electromagnetic field action. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(2):99–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Hu Y, Wang Y, Chen X, Chen S. Sonomagnetic stimulation of live cells: electrophysiologic, biochemical and behavioral responses. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(11):2970–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Shi M, Liu B, Liu G, Wang P, Yang M, Li Y, et al. Low intensity-pulsed ultrasound induced apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Ultrasonics. 2016;64:43–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Wang MH, Chen KW, Ni DX, Fang HJ, Jang LS, Chen CH. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field parameters on the proliferation of human breast cancer. Electromagn Biol Med. 2021;40:384–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Storch K, Dickreuter E, Artati A, Adamski J, Cordes N. BEMER electromagnetic field therapy reduces cancer cell radioresistance by enhanced ROS formation and induced DNA damage. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0167931.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Salinas-Asensio MM, Ríos-Arrabal S, Artacho-Cordón F, Olivares-Urbano MA, Calvente I, León J, et al. Exploring the radiosensitizing potential of magnetotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 2019;95(9):1337–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Ahlbom A, Feychting M. EMF and cancer. Science (New York, NY). 1993;260(5104):14–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Piacentini R, Ripoli C, Mezzogori D, Azzena GB, Grassi C. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields promote in vitro neurogenesis via upregulation of Ca(v)1-channel activity. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215(1):129–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Cecchetto C, Maschietto M, Boccaccio P, Vassanelli S. Electromagnetic field affects the voltage-dependent potassium channel Kv1.3. Electromagn Biol Med. 2020;39(4):316–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Zheng Y, Xia P, Dong L, Tian L, Xiong C. Effects of modulation on sodium and potassium channel currents by extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Electromagn Biol Med. 2021;40(2):274–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Batcioglu K, Uyumlu AB, Satilmis B, Yildirim B, Yucel N, Demirtas H, et al. Oxidative stress in the in vivo DMBA rat model of breast cancer: suppression by a voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitor (RS100642). Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;111(2):137–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Ramírez A, Vázquez-Sánchez AY, Carrión-Robalino N, Camacho J. Ion channels and oxidative stress as a potential link for the diagnosis or treatment of liver diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:3928714.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Gunes S, Buyukakilli B, Yaman S, Turkseven CH, Ballı E, Cimen B, et al. Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure on the skeletal muscle functions in rats. Toxicol Ind Health. 2020;36(2):119–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Feychting M, Ahlbom A, Kheifets L. EMF and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:165–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Gurney JG, van Wijngaarden E. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) and brain cancer in adults and children: review and comment. Neuro Oncol. 1999;1(3):212–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. Exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of childhood cancer. Lancet. 1999;354(9194):1925–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Di Ciaula A. Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications? Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(3):367–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Verbeek J, Oftedal G, Feychting M, van Rongen E, Rosaria Scarfì M, Mann S, et al. Prioritizing health outcomes when assessing the effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: a survey among experts. Environ Int. 2021;146:106300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Sekeroğlu V, Akar A, Sekeroğlu ZA. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM 1800 MHz) on immature and mature rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;80:140–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Atlı Şekeroğlu Z, Akar A, Şekeroğlu V. Evaluation of the cytogenotoxic damage in immature and mature rats exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013;89(11):985–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Sepehrimanesh M, Kazemipour N, Saeb M, Nazifi S, Davis DL. Proteomic analysis of continuous 900-MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in testicular tissue: a rat model of human cell phone exposure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(15):13666–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Röösli M, Lagorio S, Schoemaker MJ, Schüz J, Feychting M. Brain and salivary gland tumors and mobile phone use: evaluating the evidence from various epidemiological study designs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:221–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Buckner CA, Buckner AL, Koren SA, Persinger MA, Lafrenie RM. Exposure to a specific time-varying electromagnetic field inhibits cell proliferation via cAMP and ERK signaling in cancer cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018;39(3):217–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Wust P, Stein U, Ghadjar P. Non-thermal membrane effects of electromagnetic fields and therapeutic applications in oncology. Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):715–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Sert C, Mustafa D, Düz MZ, Akşen F, Kaya A. The preventive effect on bone loss of 50-Hz, 1-mT electromagnetic field in ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Metab. 2002;20(6):345–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Tucker JJ, Cirone JM, Morris TR, Nuss CA, Huegel J, Waldorff EI, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy improves tendon-to-bone healing in a rat rotator cuff repair model. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(4):902–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Ledda M, Megiorni F, Pozzi D, Giuliani L, D’Emilia E, Piccirillo S, et al. Non ionising radiation as a non chemical strategy in regenerative medicine: Ca(2+)-ICR “in vitro” effect on neuronal differentiation and tumorigenicity modulation in NT2 cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e61535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Sharma S, Wu SY, Jimenez H, Xing F, Zhu D, Liu Y, et al. Ca(2+) and CACNA1H mediate targeted suppression of breast cancer brain metastasis by AM RF EMF. EBioMedicine. 2019;44:194–208.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. He YL, Liu DD, Fang YJ, Zhan XQ, Yao JJ, Mei YA. Exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields modulates Na+ currents in rat cerebellar granule cells through increase of AA/PGE2 and EP receptor-mediated cAMP/PKA pathway. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Cui C, Merritt R, Fu L, Pan Z. Targeting calcium signaling in cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2017;7(1):3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Bertagna F, Lewis R, Silva SRP, McFadden J, Jeevaratnam K. Effects of electromagnetic fields on neuronal ion channels: a systematic review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021;1499(1):82–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr. Tongmei Zhang for providing writing assistance and Gege Yang for providing language help, and I appreciate their help in improving the language work of this review.

Funding

This research was supported with funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51877097). The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China

    Tian Ma, Qing Ding, Chaoxu Liu & Hua Wu

Authors
  1. Tian Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qing Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chaoxu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hua Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TM: Writing—original draft. QD: Editing pictures and tables. CL: Writing—review. HW: Writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chaoxu Liu or Hua Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, T., Ding, Q., Liu, C. et al. Electromagnetic fields regulate calcium-mediated cell fate of stem cells: osteogenesis, chondrogenesis and apoptosis. Stem Cell Res Ther 14, 133 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03303-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03303-w

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512