Skip to main content

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and their exosomes for restoration of spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systemic review


Stem cells have been introduced as new promising therapeutic agents in treatment of degenerative diseases because of having high differentiation potential while maintaining the ability to self-replicate and retaining features of their source cells. Among different type of cell therapies, mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapy is being increasingly developed as a new way to treat structural defects that need to be repaired and regenerated. Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a reproductive disease in men that causes infertility in 10% of infertile men. Based on in vitro studies, MSCs from different tissue sources have been differentiated into germ cells or gamete progenitor cells by simple methods in both male and female. On the other hand, the therapeutic effects of MSCs have been evaluated for the treatment of NOA animal models created by chemical or surgical compounds. The results of these studies confirmed successful allotransplantation or xenotransplantation of MSCs in the seminiferous tubules. As well, it has been reported that exosomes secreted by MSCs are able to induce the process of spermatogenesis in the testes of infertile animal models. Despite numerous advances in the treatment of reproductive diseases in men and women with the help of MSCs or their exosomes, no clinical trial has been terminated on the treatment of NOA. This systematic review attempts to investigate the possibility of MSC therapy for NOA in men.


In the current decade, the emerging field of stem cell therapy has quickly become a new era of regenerative medicine. The diverse potential of stem cells is a focus of research of many scientists in molecular biology, genetic engineering, and even general medicine for developing new approaches in the treatment of a number of diseases, which have always been a challenge for clinicians [1].

Stem cells are cells that are self-sustaining throughout the life of an organism and capable of differentiating into cells of various types. There are several types of stem cells found in human tissues. Among them, mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) derived from various tissues including the bone marrow and adipose tissue have been considered to be the most promising material in terms of their application for cell therapy. The MSCs are popular among scientists and clinicians due to their multilinear differentiation potential, low immunogenicity and active participation in tissue repair, and regeneration after migration to damaged sites. In general, MSCs have advantages over other types of stem cells for clinical use in cell-based therapies. These advantages include availability, easy to isolate and expand, multilineal differentiation, immunosuppressive, and both of the autograft and allograft are possible, free from ethical issues, and limited replicative lifespan [2].

According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, the marriage is considered infertile, if no pregnancy occurs within 12 months of unprotected sex [3]. This pathology is an important medico-social issue with up to one in six of married couples failing to conceive naturally [4]. Among them, 20–30% of infertility is related solely to men [5]. Infertility cases are linked to the diminished quantity or quality of ejaculate, which may be due to impaired spermatogenesis, slow maturation of spermatozoa in the epididymis, or incomplete patency of the vas deferens. The main causes of male infertility are genetic disorders, urogenital infections, hypogonadism, cryptorchidism, varicocele, ejaculatory disorders, general and systemic diseases, and immunological factors [6]. Despite its multifactorial nature, male infertility has not been fully understood and about half of cases are considered idiopathic or unexplained [7]. Investigation of male fertility usually starts with history, physical examination, and spermogram.

Azoospermia is classified as obstructive and non-obstructive (NOA). In most patients with NOA, it is possible to distinguish clinically by diagnostic workup including history, hormone levels, and physical examination. These indicators allow to confidently determine the type of azoospermia. This is important, since obstructive azoospermia is more favorable due to preservation spermatogenesis. However, the NOA accounts for about 10% of infertility cases and manifests as the absence of spermatozoa in ejaculates due to spermatogenic deficiency. In the overwhelming majority of cases, azoospermia is associated with a number of irreversible disorders of the testicles, which lead to inhibition of spermatogenesis. Such disorders are most often linked to endocrine, genetic, and inflammatory diseases [8]. In addition, NOA can be idiopathic [9]. Palpation and measurement usually reveal small and flabby testicles typical for non-obstructive azoospermia. In all patients with azoospermia, the levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, total testosterone, estradiol, and inhibin B should be measured [10]. In most patients with NOA, FSH is increased (> 7.6 IU/mL) and LH is elevated or close to normal [11]. Hypogonadism is defined by low total testosterone levels (< 300 ng/dL) and occurs in the majority of patients with NOA, usually reflecting Leydig cell deficiency [12]. Obesity can be associated with low total testosterone levels, thereby serum estradiol levels increase due to elevated aromatization of androgens in peripheral tissues [13]. Low testosterone in obese patients may also reflect adaptation to altered sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) rather than true testosterone deficiency [14].

Proper counseling and management of patients with NOA presents a challenge for andrologists, urologists, and reproductive medicine specialists. Despite this, advances in molecular biology, hormone replacement therapy, and microsurgical sperm retrieval, together with modern techniques of in vitro fertilization (IVF), give hope for natural paternity. By the way application of MSC for treatment of NOA needs more clarification which this systemic review attempts to do it.


Focused question

This systematic review was done to answer this question: “Could MSCs be applied in treatment of NOA in human?”

Search and study selection

Key words and subject terms included (“MSC” AND “azoospermia”) OR (“MSC” AND “azoospermia” AND “therapy”) OR (“MSC” AND “germ cell”) OR (“MSC” AND “infertiltiy”) OR (“MSC” AND “reproductive”). The search strategy was applied to Google Scholar and, being focused on the in vitro or in vivo studies and clinical trials, respectively. English language publications were considered. The reviews, abstracts without full manuscripts, the manuscripts about non-male reproductive system MSCs therapy, and stem cell sources other than MSCs were excluded. Data were collected from the full text of the articles as follows: (i) the source of MSCs, (ii) type of the study (in vitro, in vivo, or clinical trials), and (iii) the obtained results.

Treatment of NOA

The NOA has been considered to be a condition not responding to drug therapy [15]. Patients with NOA are unable to have children of their own and have options of either adoption or using donated sperm [16]. Despite the marked changes in spermatogenesis, these patients still have a chance to conceive. In such situations, the preservation of spermatogenesis may be focal in testicular tissues [17]. Due to irreversible nature of spermatogenesis damage in patients with NOA, testicular biopsy and assisted reproductive technologies are the only ways to obtain biological off-springs [18]. For men with NOA, testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) remains the only choice to conceive [19]. However, TESE-ICSI has limited success in patients with NOA, as during the first TESE cycle, sperm is found about 50% of cases [20], and the subsequent probability of egg fertilization with ICSI is about 50% [21]. As a result, the successful fertilization probability with this technique is about 13.4% [22]. Therefore, considering this low success rate and due to their unlimited source and high differentiation potential, MSCs have been considered as a potential new therapeutic agent for the treatment of infertility.

MSC-therapy of NOA

The MSCs were first described by Alexander Friedenstein (1924–1998) [23]. He experimentally proved the existence of stromal stem cells in the bone marrow and in lymphoid organs [24]. This discovery confirmed that the bone marrow contains a distinct population of stem cells capable of forming clones of cells of connective and hematopoietic lines [24]. Approximately 30% of the bone marrow aspirate isolated by Friedenstein consisted of MSCs [24]. These cells showed plastic adhesion capacity and were able to support differentiation and growth of various hematopoietic cell lines [24].

The MSCs are multipotent human stromal/stem cells able to self-renew [25]. The general properties of MSCs include high proliferative potential and adhesion capacity, symmetric and asymmetric division, fibroblast-like morphology, easily induced differentiation, and the formation of colonies in a culture [25]. MSCs are able to differentiate into chondrocytes, fibroblasts, osteoblasts, adipocytes, and myoblasts [25]. The therapeutic effect of MSCs is based on their ability to secrete a number of signaling molecules, which simulate the functional activity of various targets in of the body [25]. The MSCs promote growth of hematopoietic progenitors by forming the specific microenvironment (niche) [26]. To date, the following markers have been detected on the surface of MSC cells isolated from various tissues: CD105, CD106, CD13, CD140b, CD140α, CD146, CD147, CD151, CD166, CD276, CD29, CD44, CD47, CD49, CD49E, CD54, CD56, CD59, CD73, CD81, CD9, CD90, CD90.1, CD98, HLA-I, Klf-4, NANOG, nestin, NG2, Oct-3, OCT-4, PDGF-R β, prolyl-4-hydroxylase, Sox-17, SSEA-3, STRO-1, and α-SMA [27].

Besides MSCs, MSC-derived exosomes can mediate cell activity and paracrine actions through carriage of proteins, lipids miRNAs, and mRNAs into target cells [28, 29]. Moreover, exogenous exosomes regulate expression of protein or target gene resulting regulation of function of the recipient cell [30]. It has been reported that exosomes have ability to stimulate effects of stem cell-like pro-regenerative in damaged regions directly [31].

The bone marrow is one of the main sources of MSCs, and although its aspiration is the most traumatic way among the MSC isolation procedures, it is the most evaluated approach for cell therapy [32]. The MSC number, differentiation potential, and the viability of the bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs) decrease with age [33]. In this regard, the ongoing search for alternative sources of MSC is going on. MSCs derived from the adipose tissue (AT-MSCs) can be alternative solution for BM-MSCs due to their comparable differentiation and therapeutic potential [34]. The adipose tissue is not only a metabolic reservoir for storage and formation of high-energy substrates, but also participates in hormone metabolism [35]. More profound study of the adipose tissue structure was performed by Martin Rodbell (1925–1998) who used techniques of proteolytic cleavage, mechanical grinding, and differential centrifugation for isolating 2 fractions of the adipose tissue—mature adipocytes and, more compact, cellular substance, which he later called stromal-vascular fraction (SSF) [36]. The SSF is heterogeneous and includes MSCs, preadipocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, T cells, and M2 macrophages, fibroblasts, and pre-adipocytes [37]. In 2001, Zuk et al. [38] noted that properties of so-called AT-MSCs are similar to BM-MSCs. In an adult bone marrow, the ratio of MSCs to total cells is 1:10,000–100,000 [39], whereas in the adipose tissue, the ratio of MSCs to total cells is 1:30 [40]. AT-MSCs are easier and safer to obtain than BM-MSCs. The primary acquisition of AT-MSC is based on the manually procedure performed with the involvement of lipoaspirate fermentation technique [41]. The adipose tissue suitable for MSC isolation can be obtained either by skin flaps [42] or liposuction (LS) [43].

AT-MSC collection approaches for treatment of NOA

LS as a surgical intervention is preferable for aspirating adipose tissue suitable for isolation of MSC [44]. Considering complications and the little traumatic impact of LS, no long-term postoperative rehabilitation of patients is required following this operation [45]. Currently, there are various techniques for LS implementation as new state-of-the-art equipment continues to emerge such as ultrasound or laser [46, 47]. The most popular option though is classical tumescent LS, where fat tissue in the donor area of the patient’s body is infiltrated with a mixture of sterile saline with low concentrations of local anesthetic and epinephrine [48]. The LS technique may have negative or positive effects on viability and quantity of MSC isolated from fat tissue [49, 50]. With classical LS, the negative pressure in the aspirator is reversely proportional to the number of isolated stem cells [51]. According to Matsumoto et al. [52], in the case of applying this type of surgical intervention, stem cells should be processed no later than 1 day after the extraction of the fat material from the body, since storage of the fatty substrate at a room temperature decreases number of viable stem cells. Small portions of autologous adipose tissue extracted from the patient’s body with a syringe are easily processed for MSC isolation, whereas the processing of large volume of aspirated fat is associated with certain difficulties [53].

With classical LS, the aspirate is separated into 3 layers: top fatty layer contains homogenized mature adipocytes destroyed during the operation; the middle layer is intact adipose tissue and the bottom layer contains residuals of the solution infiltrated into the patient’s tissue before surgery with plasma and blood cells [54]. Both top and bottom layers are removed from the container before processing aspirated fat [54]. The remaining middle layer is washed in sterile phosphate buffer containing antibacterial and antimycotic agents to avoid microbial contamination of the material [54]. Next, the adipose tissue is lysed in sterile collagenase solution to release the components of the SSF containing stem cells [55]. Different types of enzyme are used, but collagenase type IA is the most effective for MSC isolation [56]. Currently, considering the side effects of enzymatic approaches on the MSCs, non-enzymatic explant at isolation methods has been developed [57].

Despite large numbers of registered preclinical and clinical studies, safety of MSC-related therapies has remained the major concern for clinicians. The main risks of MSCs are proinflammatory properties, tumorigenicity, and fibrosis [58]. Among them, tumorigenicity is the most serious and many studies have shown that MSCs have the ability to converse into tumors as well as the ability to trigger tumor development [59]. The excessive productions of cytokines by MSC, such as growth factors and chemokines, directly act on surface receptors of cancer cells, thereby regulating tumor enhancement [60].

MSC therapy of azoospermia from bench to bed

MSC transplantation is a relatively new therapy proposed to induce spermatogenesis and treat male infertility [61]. Since MSC are involved in processes such as cell survival, proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and immune modulation, these cells are considered as an ideal material for azoospermia treatment. Achieving this therapeutic method for treatment of NOA using MSC needs evaluation of in vitro and in vivo studies as well as possibility of clinical trials with this purpose.

In vitro studies on MSC and spermatogenesis

Some studies have indicated that embryonic stem cells very similar to MSCs found in the testes [62]. These cells are located in the basal layer of the testicular seminiferous tubules, and they can divide asymmetrically and give rise to progenitor cells. These cells survive chemotherapy and can trigger germinative cell differentiation [63]. They, therefore, serve as a reserve storage for stem cell population [64]. It is likely that the interaction between these cells and the transplanted MSC plays a crucial role in the fertility restoration.

A certain combination of growth factors, chemical components, genetic manipulations, and/or co-culture with other cells can be used to induce the differentiation of MSCs into the male (Table 1) or female germ cell epithelium (Table 2). For differentiation of various types of MSCs into male germ cells, different types of differentiation induction method have been developed as follows: (1) retinoic acid, (2) growth factors, (3) minerals, (4) co-culture, (5) conditioned media, (6) magnetic field, and (7) gene over-expression (Table 1). The results of in vitro studies have been published demonstrating that NOA can be restored through MSC transplantation. Furthermore, differentiation of AT-MSCs into male germ cells suggests that cell therapy can help reverse pathological changes in the testicular seminiferous tubules.

Table 1 Differentiation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) into male germ cells in vitro
Table 2 Differentiation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSC) into female germ cells in vitro

MSC therapy in animal model of azoospermia

MSCs transplanted into the testes of chemical or surgical NOA animal models showed both induction of spermatogenesis and/or differentiation of MSCs into germ cells (Table 3). MSC transplantation improved the expression of germ cell markers in the testes and can be proposed as a suitable method for the treatment of infertility. Several possible mechanisms of testicular function restoration during MSC-induced tissue regeneration have been shown: (1) MSCs may be involved in the suppression of antisperm antibodies (ASA) [147]; (2) MSCs can reduce factors that lead to infertility through reduction of apoptosis [127]; (3) MSCs can reduce oxidative stress [139]; (4) MSCs can stimulate testosterone production [126] with differentiation into Laydig cells [148]; (5) MSCs can differentiate into target cells [133]; (6) the transplanted cells secrete growth factors such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), which are male germ cell inducing factors with ability to stimulate restoration of the recipient’s cellular function [149]; (7) MSCs connect with endogenous cells, restoring the function of damaged cells [150]; (8) MSCs reverse the glycolysis and glycogenesis imbalance in sperm by regulating Akt/glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) axis [151]; and (9) MSCs can alter expression of some spermatogenesis-related miRNAs and their target genes [134].

Table 3 Azoospermia treated with mesenchymal stromal/stem cells in in vivo model studies

MSC therapy of azoospermia patients

Studies on in vitro differentiation of MSCs to germ cells and MSC therapy of animal models of azoospermia have showed the possibility of using MSC therapy to treat azoospermia in humans. Various clinical trials for the treatment of infertility in reproductive diseases in both women and men have been recorded or completed (Table 4). However, no studies have been published to treat azoospermia with the help of MSCs except an abstract from Jordan scientists demonstrating therapeutic effects of intratesticular injections of CD34/CD133 BM-MSCs in azoospermia men. At the same time, based on the information available in the US National Library of Medicine and in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, 6 studies (Table 4) and 1 study (IRCT20190519043634N1), respectively, have been recruited for this purpose.

Table 4 Clinical trials on mesenchymal stromal/stem cells-based therapy for female and male reproductive diseases (U. S. National Library of Medicine)


The potential of MSCs in restoration of fertility in patients with NOA has been shown in this systematic review. Mastering and successfully applying this technique in clinical practice can help a vast group of patients to revive spermatogenesis and enjoy fatherhood. Based on the current knowledge answering to this important question “which MSCs source have a better therapeutic potential to azoospermia?” is not easy. Lack of comparing studies between the MSCs’ sources for treatment of azoospermia in the three layers of in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials made it difficult to rank the cell sources. By the way, considering the efficiency of cell isolation and complications of achieving a good cell source including higher number of cell yield, lower surgical manipulations, and similarity of donor cells and recipient, we can suggest adipose tissue-derived MSCs for treatment of azoospermia. However, other MSC sources may also be efficient for cell therapy of azoospermia.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Antisperm antibodies


Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cell


Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cell


Bone morphogenetic protein


Follicle-stimulating hormone


Glycogen synthase kinase 3


Intracytoplasmic sperm injection


In vitro fertilization


Luteinizing hormone




Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell


Non-obstructive azoospermia


Sex hormone-binding globulin


Stromal-vascular fraction


Testicular sperm extraction


Transforming growth factor beta


World Health Organization


  1. 1.

    Thompson M, Mei SH, Wolfe D, Champagne J, Fergusson D, Stewart DJ, et al. Cell therapy with intravascular administration of mesenchymal stromal cells continues to appear safe: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;19:100249.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kim HJ, Park J-S. Usage of human mesenchymal stem cells in cell-based therapy: advantages and disadvantages. Dev Reprod. 2017;21(1):1–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Organization WH. Revised glossary on assisted reproductive terminology (ART). Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1520–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Katz DJ, Teloken P, Shoshany O. Male infertility-the other side of the equation. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46(9):641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Duca Y, Calogero AE, Cannarella R, Condorelli RA, La Vignera S. Current and emerging medical therapeutic agents for idiopathic male infertility. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019;20(1):55–67.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP. Review of azoospermia. Spermatogenesis. 2014;4:e28218-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Oud MS, Ramos L, O'Bryan MK, McLachlan RI, Okutman Ö, Viville S, et al. Validation and application of a novel integrated genetic screening method to a cohort of 1,112 men with idiopathic azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. Hum Mutat. 2017;38(11):1592–605.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kumanov P. Managing infertility due to endocrine causes. In: The Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Infertility, Aziz N, Agarwal A. (Eds): Springer, Switzerland; 2017. p. 63–78.

  11. 11.

    Gordetsky J, van Wijngaarden E, O'Brien J. Redefining abnormal follicle-stimulating hormone in the male infertility population. BJU Int. 2012;110(4):568–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ring J, Welliver C, Parenteau M, Markwell S, Brannigan RE, Köhler TS. The utility of sex hormone-binding globulin in hypogonadism and infertile males. J Urol. 2017;197(5):1326–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fernandez CJ, Chacko EC, Pappachan JM. Male obesity-related secondary hypogonadism–pathophysiology. Clin Implications Manage Eur Endocrinol. 2019;15(2):83.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hammond GL. Sex hormone-binding globulin and the metabolic syndrome. In: Male Hypogonadism, Winters S, Huhtaniemi IT (Eds.): Springer, Switzerland; 2017. p. 305–324.

  15. 15.

    Medicine PCotASfR. Management of nonobstructive azoospermia: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(7):1239–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Vij SC, Sabanegh E Jr, Agarwal A. Biological therapy for non-obstructive azoospermia. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018;18(1):19–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Caroppo E, Colpi E, Gazzano G, Vaccalluzzo L, Piatti E, D'Amato G, et al. The seminiferous tubule caliber pattern as evaluated at high magnification during microdissection testicular sperm extraction predicts sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Andrology. 2019;7(1):8–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ishikawa T. Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(1):109–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Corona G, Minhas S, Giwercman A, Bettocchi C, Dinkelman-Smit M, Dohle G, Fusco F, Kadioglou A, Kliesch S, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Pelliccione F, Pizzocaro A, Rassweiler J, Verze P, Vignozzi L, Weidner W, Maggi M, Sofikitis N. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(6):733–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Esteves SC, Ramasamy R, Colpi GM, Carvalho JF, Schlegel PN. Sperm retrieval rates by micro-TESE versus conventional TESE in men with non-obstructive azoospermia—the assumption of independence in effect sizes might lead to misleading conclusions. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(4):603–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yalcin I, Berker B, Sukur YE, Kahraman K, Ates C. Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa success in infertile men with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia; a retrospective analysis. Hum Fertil. 2017;20(3):186–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Oses R, Villarroel MZ, Medel P, Ojeda MG, Viola J, Valcarcel A. TESE-ICSI in couples with nonobstructive azoospermia: comparison between fresh or previously cryopreserved testicular sperm. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):e289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Afanasyev BV, Elstner E, Zander AR. AJ Friedenstein, founder of the mesenchymal stem cell concept. Cell Ther Transplant. 2009;1(3):35–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Friedenstein A, Chailakhjan R, Lalykina K. The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of Guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Prolif. 1970;3(4):393–403.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Andrzejewska A, Lukomska B, Janowski M. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: from roots to boost. Stem Cells. 2019;37(7):855–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Scadden DT. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature. 2006;441(7097):1075–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Manaph NPA, Sivanathan KN, Nitschke J, Zhou X-F, Coates PT, Drogemuller CJ. An overview on small molecule-induced differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into beta cells for diabetic therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ibrahim A, Marbán E. Exosomes: fundamental biology and roles in cardiovascular physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 2016;78(1):67–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jiang N, Xiang L, He L, Yang G, Zheng J, Wang C, Zhang Y, Wang S, Zhou Y, Sheu TJ, Wu J, Chen K, Coelho PG, Tovar NM, Kim SH, Chen M, Zhou YH, Mao JJ. Exosomes mediate epithelium–mesenchyme crosstalk in organ development. ACS Nano. 2017;11(8):7736–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yeung CLA, Co N-N, Tsuruga T, Yeung T-L, Kwan S-Y, Leung CS, et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Basu J, Ludlow JW. Exosomes for repair, regeneration and rejuvenation. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016;16(4):489–506.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kingery MT, Manjunath AK, Anil U, Strauss EJ. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell therapy and related bone marrow-derived orthobiologic therapeutics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(4):451–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ganguly P, El-Jawhari JJ, Giannoudis PV, Burska AN, Ponchel F, Jones EA. Age-related changes in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells: a potential impact on osteoporosis and osteoarthritis development. Cell Transplant. 2017;26(9):1520–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jin HJ, Bae YK, Kim M, Kwon S-J, Jeon HB, Choi SJ, Kim S, Yang Y, Oh W, Chang J. Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood as sources of cell therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(9):17986–8001.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Choe SS, Huh JY, Hwang IJ, Kim JI, Kim JB. Adipose tissue remodeling: its role in energy metabolism and metabolic disorders. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2016;7:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rodbell M. Localization of lipoprotein lipase in fat cells of rat adipose tissue. J Biol Chem. 1964;239(3):753–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Han S, Sun HM, Hwang K-C, Kim S-W. Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells: update on clinical utility and efficacy. Critical Reviews™ in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. 2015;25(2):145–152.

  38. 38.

    Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(2):211–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Immunoregulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(10):2566–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fraser JK, Zhu M, Wulur I, Alfonso Z. Adipose-derived stem cells. In: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Prockop DJ, Phinney DG, Bunnell BA (Eds.): Springer, Switzerland; 2008. p. 59–67.

  41. 41.

    Fraser JK. Hedrick MH. Google Patents: Method for processing lipoaspirate cells; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Li Y, Jiang Q-L, Van der Merwe L, Lou D-H, Lin C. Preclinical efficacy of stem cell therapy for skin flap: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dubois SG, Floyd EZ, Zvonic S, Kilroy G, Wu X, Carling S, et al. Isolation of human adipose-derived stem cells from biopsies and liposuction specimens. In: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Prockop DJ, Phinney DG, Bunnell BA (Eds.): Springer, Switzerland; 2008. p. 69–79.

  44. 44.

    Tarallo M, Fino P, Ribuffo D, Casella D, Toscani M, Spalvieri C, Lattanzi W, di Taranto G. Liposuction aspirate fluid adipose-derived stem cell injection and secondary healing in fingertip injury: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(1):136–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chia CT, Neinstein RM, Theodorou SJ. Evidence-based medicine: liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(1):267e–74e.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jewell ML. Ultrasonic-assisted liposuction: introduction and historic perspectives. In: Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction, Garcia JO (Ed.): Springer, Switzerland; 2020. p. 3–8

  47. 47.

    Centurion P, Caballero G, Weiss M. Comment to:“laser-assisted liposuction (LAL) versus traditional liposuction: systematic review”. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2019;43(4):1122–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wollina U, Heinig B. Madelung’s disease–case series and treatment by tumescent liposuction or lipectomy. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2017;5(4):427–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Schneider S, Unger M, van Griensven M, Balmayor ER. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from liposuction and resected fat are feasible sources for regenerative medicine. Eur J Med Res. 2017;22(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Grambow F, Rutkowski R, Podmelle F, Schmoeckel K, Siegerist F, Domanski G, Schuster MW, Domanska G. The impact of Lidocaine on adipose-derived stem cells in human adipose tissue harvested by liposuction and used for lipotransfer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2869.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Keck M, Kober J, Riedl O, Kitzinger HB, Wolf S, Stulnig TM, Zeyda M, Gugerell A. Power assisted liposuction to obtain adipose-derived stem cells: impact on viability and differentiation to adipocytes in comparison to manual aspiration. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(1):e1–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Matsumoto D, Shigeura T, Sato K, Inoue K, Suga H, Kato H, Aoi N, Murase S, Gonda K, Yoshimura K. Influences of preservation at various temperatures on liposuction aspirates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(6):1510–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Schreml S, Babilas P, Fruth S, Orsó E, Schmitz G, Mueller MB, Nerlich M, Prantl L. Harvesting human adipose tissue-derived adult stem cells: resection versus liposuction. Cytotherapy. 2009;11(7):947–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Palumbo P, Miconi G, Cinque B, la Torre C, Lombardi F, Zoccali G, Orsini G, Leocata P, Giuliani M, Cifone MG. In vitro evaluation of different methods of handling human liposuction aspirate and their effect on adipocytes and adipose derived stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(8):1974–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mushahary D, Spittler A, Kasper C, Weber V, Charwat V. Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cytometry Part A. 2018;93(1):19–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Alstrup T, Eijken M, Bohn AB, Møller B, Damsgaard TE. Isolation of adipose tissue–derived stem cells: enzymatic digestion in combination with mechanical distortion to increase adipose tissue–derived stem cell yield from human aspirated fat. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2019;48(1):e68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bellei B, Migliano E, Tedesco M, Caputo S, Picardo M. Maximizing non-enzymatic methods for harvesting adipose-derived stem from lipoaspirate: technical considerations and clinical implications for regenerative surgery. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Han Y, Li X, Zhang Y, Han Y, Chang F, Ding J. Mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative medicine. Cells. 2019;8(8):886.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Li C, Zhao H, Wang B. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: developmental origin, tumorigenesis and translational cancer therapeutics. Transl Oncol. 2020;14(1):100948.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Melzer C, Yang Y, Hass R. Interaction of MSC with tumor cells. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2016;14(1):20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Tamadon A, Zhan-byrbekuly U, Kairgaliyev I, Khoradmehr A. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy of male infertility; Male Reproductive Health: IntechOpen 2019.

  62. 62.

    Chikhovskaya J, Jonker M, Meissner A, Breit T, Repping S, Van Pelt A. Human testis-derived embryonic stem cell-like cells are not pluripotent, but possess potential of mesenchymal progenitors. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):210–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bhartiya D. The need to revisit the definition of mesenchymal and adult stem cells based on their functional attributes. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bhartiya D, Anand S. Effects of oncotherapy on testicular stem cells and niche. MHR. 2017;23(9):654–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wei Y, Fang J, Cai S, Lv C, Zhang S, Hua J. Primordial germ cell–like cells derived from canine adipose mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2016;49(4):503–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Fang J, Wei Y, Lv C, Peng S, Zhao S, Hua J. CD61 promotes the differentiation of canine ADMSCs into PGC-like cells through modulation of TGF-β signaling. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):43851.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    P-z L, G-y Y, Han L, Pang J, B-s Z, G-m Z, et al. Overexpression of STRA8, BOULE, and DAZL genes promotes goat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro transdifferentiation toward putative male germ cells. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(2):300–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Liu H, Chen M, Liu L, Ren S, Cheng P, Zhang H. Induction of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells into germ lineage using retinoic acid. Cellular Reprogramming. 2018;20(2):127–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Ghatreh K, Eliyasi M, Alaei S, Saki G. Differentiation potential of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells into germ cells with and without growth factors. Andrologia. 2021;53(1):e13892.

  70. 70.

    Luo Y, Xie L, Mohsin A, Ahmed W, Xu C, Peng Y, Hang H, Zhuang Y, Chu J, Guo M. Efficient generation of male germ-like cells derived during co-culturing of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with Sertoli cells under retinoic acid and testosterone induction. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bräunig P, Glanzner W, Rissi V, Gonçalves P. The differentiation potential of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells into cell lineage related to male germ cells. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2018;70(1):160–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Alifi F, Asgari HR. Alteration in expression of primordial germ cell (PGC) markers during induction of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (hAMSCs). J Reprod Infertil. 2020;21(1):59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Afsartala Z, Rezvanfar MA, Hodjat M, Tanha S, Assadollahi V, Bijangi K, Abdollahi M, Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M. Amniotic membrane mesenchymal stem cells can differentiate into germ cells in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016;52(10):1060–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Yan G, Fan Y, Li P, Zhang Y, Wang F. Ectopic expression of DAZL gene in goat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhances the trans-differentiation to putative germ cells compared to the exogenous treatment of retinoic acid or bone morphogenetic protein 4 signalling molecules. Cell Biol Int. 2015;39(1):74–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Salem M, Mirzapour T, Bayrami A, Sagha M. Germ cell differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Andrologia. 2019;51(4):e13229.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Drusenheimer N, Wulf G, Nolte J, Lee JH, Dev A, Dressel R, et al. Putative human male germ cells from bone marrow stem cells. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;63:69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Mazaheri Z, Movahedin M, Rahbarizadeh F, Amanpour S. Different doses of bone morphogenetic protein 4 promote the expression of early germ cell-specific gene in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2011;47(8):521–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Shirazi R, Zarnani AH, Soleimani M, Abdolvahabi MA, Nayernia K, Kashani IR. BMP4 can generate primordial germ cells from bone-marrow-derived pluripotent stem cells. Cell Biol Int. 2012;36(12):1185–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Shirzeyli MH, Khanlarkhani N, Amidi F, Shirzeyli FH, Aval FS, Sobhani A. Bones Morphogenic Protein-4 and retinoic acid combined treatment comparative analysis for in vitro differentiation potential of murine mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue into germ cells. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(11):1151–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Behzadi Fard S, Mazaheri Z, Ghorbanmehr N, Movahedin M, Behzadi Fard M, Gholampour MA. Analysis of MiRNA-17 and MiRNA-146 expression during differentiation of spermatogonial stem like cells derived from mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2019;8(1):14–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nayernia K, Lee JH, Drusenheimer N, Nolte J, Wulf G, Dressel R, Gromoll J, Engel W. Derivation of male germ cells from bone marrow stem cells. Lab Investig. 2006;86(7):654–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Shirazi R, Zarnani AH, Soleimani M, Nayernia K, Ragerdi KI. Differentiation of bone marrow-derived stage-specific embryonic antigen 1 positive pluripotent stem cells into male germ cells. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(4):430–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kashani IR, Zarnani AH, Soleimani M, Abdolvahabi MA, Nayernia K, Shirazi R. Retinoic acid induces mouse bone marrow-derived CD15+, Oct4+ and CXCR4+ stem cells into male germ-like cells in a two-dimensional cell culture system. Cell Biol Int. 2014;38(6):782–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Monfared MH, Minaee B, Rastegar T, Khrazinejad E, Barbarestani M. Sertoli cell condition medium can induce germ like cells from bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2016;19(11):1186–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Jouni FJ, Abdolmaleki P, Behmanesh M, Movahedin M. An in vitro study of the impact of 4mT static magnetic field to modify the differentiation rate of rat bone marrow stem cells into primordial germ cells. Differentiation. 2014;87(5):230–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ghorbanlou M, Abdanipour A, Shirazi R, Malekmohammadi N, Shokri S, Nejatbakhsh R. Indirect co-culture of testicular cells with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells leads to male germ cell-specific gene expressions. Cell J. 2019;20(4):505–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Aziz MTA, Mostafa T, Atta H, Asaad S, Fouad HH, Mohsen G, et al. In vitro and in vivo lineage conversion of bone marrow stem cells into germ cells in experimental azoospermia in rat. Stem Cell Stud. 2011;1(1):e15-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Kumar K, Das K, Madhusoodan A, Kumar A, Singh P, Mondal T, et al. Rat bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate to germ cell like cells. bioRxiv. 2018:418962.

  89. 89.

    Zhang D, Liu X, Peng J, He D, Lin T, Zhu J, Li X, Zhang Y, Wei G. Potential spermatogenesis recovery with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in an azoospermic rat model. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(8):13151–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolai M, Batavani R, Eslaminejad MB, Sedighi-Gilani M. Effect of zinc ions on differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to male germ cells and some germ cell-specific gene expression in rams. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;150(1–3):137–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M, Sayahpour FA, Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M, Ghorbanian MT, Eslaminejad MB. Organic and inorganic zinc show similar regulatory effects on the expression of some germ cell specific markers induced in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells after treatment with retinoic acid. Biologia. 2019;74(12):1721–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M, Eslaminejad MB, Sedighi-Gilani M. Derivation of male germ cells from ram bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by three different methods and evaluation of their fate after transplantation into the testis. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016;52(1):49–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M, Eslaminejad MB, Batavani R, Sedighi-Gilani M. Comparison of the efficacy of three concentrations of retinoic acid for transdifferentiation induction in sheep marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into male germ cells. Andrologia. 2014;46(1):24–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M, Sedighi-Gilani M, Eslaminejad M. Induction of ram bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into germ cell lineage using transforming growth factor-β superfamily growth factors. Reprod Domest Anim. 2014;49(4):588–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Hua J, Pan S, Yang C, Dong W, Dou Z, Sidhu KS. Derivation of male germ cell-like lineage from human fetal bone marrow stem cells. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;19(1):99–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Hua J, Yu H, Dong W, Yang C, Gao Z, Lei A, Sun Y, Pan S, Wu Y, Dou Z. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from human fetal lung: potential differentiation of germ cells. Tissue Cell. 2009;41(6):448–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Hua J, Qiu P, Zhu H, Cao H, Wang F, Li W. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from human umbilical cord: potential differentiation of germ cells. Afr J Biochem Res. 2011;5(4):113–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Latifpour M, Shakiba Y, Amidi F, Mazaheri Z, Sobhani A. Differentiation of human umbilical cord matrix-derived mesenchymal stem cells into germ-like cells. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2014;6(4):218.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Li N, Pan S, Zhu H, Mu H, Liu W, Hua J. BMP4 promotes SSEA-1+ hUC-MSC differentiation into male germ-like cells in vitro. Cell Prolif. 2014;47(4):299–309.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Li B, Liu W, Zhuang M, Li N, Wu S, Pan S, Hua J. Overexpression of CD61 promotes hUC-MSC differentiation into male germ-like cells. Cell Prolif. 2016;49(1):36–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Majidi F, Bamehr H, Shalchian Z, Kouchakian MR, Mohammadzadeh N, Khalili A. Differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell into germ-like cell under effect of co-culture with testicular cell tissue. Anat Histol Embryol. 2020;49(3):359–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Amidi F, Ataie Nejad N, Agha Hoseini M, Nayernia K, Mazaheri Z, Yamini N, Saeednia S. In vitro differentiation process of human Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells to male germ cells in the presence of gonadal and non-gonadal conditioned media with retinoic acid. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2015;51(10):1093–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Ataie Nejad N, Amidi F, Hoseini MA, Nia KN, Habibi M, Kajbafzadeh AM, et al. Male germ-like cell differentiation potential of human umbilical cord Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells in co-culture with human placenta cells in presence of BMP4 and retinoic acid. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2015;18(4):325–33.

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Huang P, Lin LM, Wu XY, Tang QL, Feng XY, Lin GY, et al. Differentiation of human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells into germ-like cells in vitro. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109(4):747–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Dissanayake D, Patel H, Wijesinghe P. Differentiation of human male germ cells from Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2018;45(2):75–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Ghaem Maghami R, Mirzapour T, Bayrami A. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to germ-like cells under induction of Sertoli cell-conditioned medium and retinoic acid. Andrologia. 2018;50(3):e12887.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Xie L, Lin L, Tang Q, Li W, Huang T, Huo X, et al. Sertoli cell-mediated differentiation of male germ cell-like cells from human umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells in an in vitro co-culture system. Eur J Med Res. 2015;20(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Song S-H, Kumar BM, Kang E-J, Lee Y-M, Kim T-H, Ock S-A, Lee SL, Jeon BG, Rho GJ. Characterization of porcine multipotent stem/stromal cells derived from skin, adipose, and ovarian tissues and their differentiation in vitro into putative oocyte-like cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20(8):1359–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Asgari HR, Akbari M, Yazdekhasti H, Rajabi Z, Navid S, Aliakbari F, et al. Comparison of human amniotic, chorionic, and umbilical cord multipotent mesenchymal stem cells regarding their capacity for differentiation toward female germ cells. Cell Reprogram. 2017;19(1):44–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Taheri Moghadam M, Saki G, Nikbakht R, Eftekhari Moghadam AR. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 induces differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human follicular fluid to oocyte-like cell. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(1):127–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Eyni H, Ghorbani S, Shirazi R, Salari Asl L, P Beiranvand S, Soleimani M. Three-dimensional wet-electrospun poly (lactic acid)/multi-wall carbon nanotubes scaffold induces differentiation of human menstrual blood-derived stem cells into germ-like cells. J Biomater Appl 2017;32(3):373–383, doi:

  112. 112.

    Lai D, Guo Y, Zhang Q, Chen Y, Xiang C. Differentiation of human menstrual blood-derived endometrial mesenchymal stem cells into oocyte-like cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2016;48(11):998–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Lv X, Zhu H, Bai Y, Chu Z, Hu Y, Cao H, Liu C, He X, Peng S, Gao Z, Yang C, Hua J. Reversine promotes porcine muscle derived stem cells (PMDSCs) differentiation into female germ-like cells. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(12):3629–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Lee Y-M, Kim T-H, Lee J-H, Lee W-J, Jeon R-H, Jang S-J, Ock SA, Lee SL, Park BW, Rho GJ. Overexpression of Oct4 in porcine ovarian stem/stromal cells enhances differentiation of oocyte-like cells in vitro and ovarian follicular formation in vivo. Journal of Ovarian Research. 2016;9(1):24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    de Souza G, Costa J, da Cunha E, Passos J, Ribeiro R, Saraiva M, van den Hurk R, Silva JRV. Bovine ovarian stem cells differentiate into germ cells and oocyte-like structures after culture in vitro. Reprod Domest Anim. 2017;52(2):243–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Mirzaeian L, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Esfandiari F, Eivazkhani F, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Moini A, Fathi R. Induction of mouse peritoneum mesenchymal stem cells into germ cell-like cells using follicular fluid and cumulus cells-conditioned media. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28(8):554–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Dyce PW, Wen L, Li J. In vitro germline potential of stem cells derived from fetal porcine skin. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(4):384–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Qiu P, Bai Y, Liu C, He X, Cao H, Li M, Zhu H, Hua J. A dose-dependent function of follicular fluid on the proliferation and differentiation of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of goat. Histochem Cell Biol. 2012;138(4):593–603.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Qiu P, Bai Y, Pan S, Li W, Liu W, Hua J. Gender depended potentiality of differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into oocyte-like cells in vitro. Cell Biochem Funct. 2013;31(5):365–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Zolfaghar M, Mirzaeian L, Beiki B, Naji T, Moini A, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Akbarinejad V, Vernengo AJ, Fathi R. Wharton’s jelly derived mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into oocyte like cells in vitro by follicular fluid and cumulus cells conditioned medium. Heliyon. 2020;6(10):e04992.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Karimaghai N, Tamadon A, Rahmanifar F, Mehrabani D, Jahromi AR, Zare S, et al. Spermatogenesis after transplantation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in busulfan-induced azoospermic hamster. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018;21(7):660.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Zhankina R, Afshar A, Farrar Z, Khoradmehr A, Baghban M, Suleiman M, et al. Restoration of spermatogenesis in azoospermic mice by bone marrow mesenchymal stromal/stem cells conditioned medium. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Cakici C, Buyrukcu B, Duruksu G, Haliloglu AH, Aksoy A, Isık A, Uludag O, Ustun H, Subası C, Karaoz E. Recovery of fertility in azoospermia rats after injection of adipose-tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: the sperm generation. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Mehrabani D, Hassanshahi MA, Tamadon A, Zare S, Keshavarz S, Rahmanifar F, et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells repair germinal cells of seminiferous tubules of busulfan-induced azoospermic rats. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8(2):103.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Meligy FY, Abo Elgheed AT, Alghareeb SM. Therapeutic effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on Cisplatin induced testicular damage in adult male albino rat. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2019;43(1):28–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Hsiao C-H, Ji AT-Q, Chang C-C, Cheng C-J, Lee L-M, Ho JH-C. Local injection of mesenchymal stem cells protects testicular torsion-induced germ cell injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1):113.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Qian C, Meng Q, Lu J, Zhang L, Li H, Huang B. Human amnion mesenchymal stem cells restore spermatogenesis in mice with busulfan-induced testis toxicity by inhibiting apoptosis and oxidative stress. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020;11(1):1–12, doi:

  128. 128.

    Hajihoseini M, Vahdati A, Ebrahim Hosseini S, Mehrabani D, Tamadon A. Induction of spermatogenesis after stem cell therapy of azoospermic Guinea pigs. Vet Arh. 2017;87(3):333–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Tamadon A, Mehrabani D, Rahmanifar F, Jahromi AR, Panahi M, Zare S, Khodabandeh Z, Jahromi IR, Tanideh N, Dianatpour M, Ramzi M, Koohi-Hoseinabadi O. Induction of spermatogenesis by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in busulfan-induced azoospermia in hamster. Int J Stem Cells. 2015;8(2):134–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Kadam P, Ntemou E, Baert Y, Van Laere S, Van Saen D, Goossens E. Co-transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells improves spermatogonial stem cell transplantation efficiency in mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):317.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Lue Y, Erkkila K, Liu PY, Ma K, Wang C, Hikim AS, Swerdloff RS. Fate of bone marrow stem cells transplanted into the testis: potential implication for men with testicular failure. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(3):899–908.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Sherif IO, Sabry D, Abdel-Aziz A, Sarhan OM. The role of mesenchymal stem cells in chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):196.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei M, Batavani R, Eslaminejad MB, Sayahpour F. Transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into the testes of infertile male rats and new germ cell formation. Int J Stem Cells. 2016;9(2):250–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Badawy AA, El-Magd MA, AlSadrah SA, Alruwaili MM. Altered expression of some miRNAs and their target genes following mesenchymal stem cell treatment in busulfan-induced azoospermic rats. Gene. 2020;737:144481.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Zahkook S, Atwa A, Shahat M, Mansour AM, Bakry S. Mesenchymal stem cells restore fertility in induced azoospermic rats following chemotherapy administration. J Reprod Infertil. 2014;5(2):50–7.

    Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Rahmanifar F, Tamadon A, Mehrabani D, Zare S, Abasi S, Keshavarz S, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of treatment of rat azoospermic seminiferous tubules by allotransplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2016;19(6):653.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Zhou X, Ma Y, Wang X, Liu D, Ren Y, Ji X. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to repair the reproductive system of male azoospermia rats. Zhonghua nan ke xue. 2015;21(8):692–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Monsefi M, Fereydouni B, Rohani L, Talaei T. Mesenchymal stem cells repair germinal cells of seminiferous tubules of sterile rats. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(7):537–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Abdelaziz MH, Salah El-Din EY, El-Dakdoky MH, Ahmed TA. The impact of mesenchymal stem cells on doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity and progeny outcome of male prepubertal rats. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111(13):906–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Hassan AI, Alam SS. Evaluation of mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of infertility in male rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5(6):131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Sabbaghi MA, Bahrami AR, Feizzade B, Kalantar SM, Matin MM, Kalantari M, Aflatoonian A, Saeinasab M. Trial evaluation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplantation in revival of spermatogenesis in testicular torsion. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2012;17(4):243–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Wang F, Liu C, Zhang S-s, Liu W-s, Hua J-l. Transplantation of goat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (gMSCs) help restore spermatogenesis in endogenous germ cells-depleted mouse models. J Integr Agric 2013;12(3):483–494, doi:

  143. 143.

    Yang R-F, Liu T-H, Zhao K, Xiong C-L. Enhancement of mouse germ cell-associated genes expression by injection of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into the testis of chemical-induced azoospermic mice. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(5):698.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Abd Allah SH, Pasha HF, Abdelrahman AA, Mazen NF. Molecular effect of human umbilical cord blood CD34-positive and CD34-negative stem cells and their conjugate in azoospermic mice. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;428(1–2):179–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Chen H, Tang Q-L, Wu X-Y, Xie L-C, Lin L-M, Ho G-Y, et al. Differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into germ-like cells in mouse seminiferous tubules. Mol Med Report. 2015;12(1):819–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Deng C, Xie Y, Zhang C, Ouyang B, Chen H, Lv L, Yao J, Liang X, Zhang Y, Sun X, Deng C, Liu G. Urine-derived stem cells facilitate endogenous spermatogenesis restoration of busulfan-induced nonobstructive azoospermic mice by paracrine exosomes. Stem Cells Dev. 2019;28(19):1322–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Aghamir SMK, Salavati A, Yousefie R, Tootian Z, Ghazaleh N, Jamali M, Azimi P. Does bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell transfusion prevent antisperm antibody production after traumatic testis rupture? Urology. 2014;84(1):82–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Xing X, Zhang Z, Zhong L, Ju G, Zou X, Zhu Y, Sun J. Differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into steroidogenic cells in vitro. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(6):3527–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Hofer HR, Tuan RS. Secreted trophic factors of mesenchymal stem cells support neurovascular and musculoskeletal therapies. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):131.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Kadam P, Ntemou E, Onofre J, Van Saen D, Goossens E. Does co-transplantation of mesenchymal and spermatogonial stem cells improve reproductive efficiency and safety in mice? Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):310.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Hsiao C-H, Ji AT-Q, Chang C-C, Chien M-H, Lee L-M, Ho JH-C. Mesenchymal stem cells restore the sperm motility from testicular torsion-detorsion injury by regulation of glucose metabolism in sperm. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):270.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study has been financially supported by Allame Tabatabaei Post-Doc Fellowship Program from Iran's National Elites Foundation (INEF). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




U.Z., R.S., I.N., and A.T. conceived and designed the format of the manuscript. R.Z., N.B., M.A., D.S., A.I., B.K., and A.K. drafted and edited the manuscript. U.Z., R.S., I.N., and A.T. reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical reading and discussion of the manuscript. The authors have read and agreed to the published version of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Reza Shirazi or Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly or Amin Tamadon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhankina, R., Baghban, N., Askarov, M. et al. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and their exosomes for restoration of spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systemic review. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 229 (2021).

Download citation


  • Non-obstructive azoospermia
  • Infertility
  • Mesenchymal stromal/stem cell
  • In vitro study
  • Animal model
  • Clinical trial