Skip to main content
Download PDF

The therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived exosomes in the ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 13, Article number: 138 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy is a novel treatment strategy for cancer and a wide range of diseases with an excessive immune response such as ulcerative colitis (UC), due to its powerful immunomodulatory properties and its capacity for tissue regeneration and repair. One of the promising therapeutic options can focus on MSC-secreted exosomes (MSC-Exo), which have been identified as a type of paracrine interaction. In light of a wide variety of recent experimental studies, the present review aims to seek the recent research advances of therapies based on the MSC-Exo for treating UC and colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed from inception to December 2021 using the terms [(“colorectal cancer” OR “bowel cancer” OR “colon cancer” OR “rectal cancer”) AND (exosome) AND (stem cell) AND (“inflammatory bowel disease” OR “Crohn's disease” OR “colitis”)] in titles and abstracts.

Findings

Exosomes derived from various sources of MSCs, including human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs), human adipose-derived MSCs (hAD-MSCs), human bone marrow-derived MSCs (hBM-MSCs), and olfactory ecto-MSCs (OE-MSCs), have shown the protective role against UC and CRC. Exosomes from hUC-MSCs, hBM-MSCs, AD-MSCs, and OE-MSCs have been found to ameliorate the experimental UC through suppressing inflammatory cells including macrophages, Th1/Th17 cells, reducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, as well as inducing the anti-inflammatory function of Treg and Th2 cells and enhancing the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, hBM-MSC-Exo and hUC-MSC-Exo containing tumor-suppressive miRs (miR-3940-5p/miR-22-3p/miR‐16‐5p) have been shown to suppress proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells via regulation of RAP2B/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and ITGA2/ITGA6.

Key messages

The MSC-Exo can exert beneficial effects on UC and CRC through two different mechanisms including modulating immune responses and inducing anti-tumor responses, respectively.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, is a malignancy emerging from the colon and/or rectum [1]. Colon cancer accounts for 72% and rectal cancer for 28% of all CRCs [2]. More than 90% of CRC cases are adenocarcinoma that emerges from the glandular epithelial cells of the colon and/or rectum. CRC arises when these epithelial cells acquire the epigenetic or genetic mutations that confer on them an excessive replication and survival. Such hyper-proliferative cells cause a benign adenoma called polyps, which may then progress to invasive carcinoma (adenocarcinoma) and, eventually over decades, metastasize to different distant organs [2]. Symptoms and signs include blood in the stool and from the rectum, changes in bowel habits and movements, abdominal pain and bloating, fatigue, anemia, and unexplained weight loss [2]. A wide range of risk factors is associated with the incidence of CRC, mainly such as sex, age, hereditary mutations, race and ethnicity, environmental factors and lifestyle, diabetes, cystic fibrosis, as well as ulcerative colitis (UC) [2]. Of note, UC is one of the most important high-risk conditions for CRC incidence and progression. CRC is the most common malignancy among UC patients [3]. The results of a meta-analysis indicated that UC elevates the risk of CRC development by 2.4-fold [4].

UC is a major form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), characterized by chronic inflammation and ulcers of the colonic mucosa with variable extension from the rectum toward the cecum. The etiology of UC is complicated and the major pathogenic mechanism is the uncontrolled activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. The former is the initial defense guard against pathogenic factors, and the latter is contributed as the principal culprit of disease development [5]. Briefly, pathogenic factors activate CD4+ T cells that differentiate into CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells, including Th1 and Th17 cells, and induce the generation of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages or other pro-inflammatory cells. Both Th1 and Th17 cells secrete a wide range of inflammatory cytokines to provoke intestinal epithelial inflammatory cells infiltrate and chronic colitis [5, 6]. Of note, intestinal epithelial inflammation can be repressed by the differentiation of CD4+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and the supplementary of CD4+ Th2 cells. TGF-β and IL-10 released by Tregs provide an immunosuppressive microenvironment that accelerates the repair of the colon mucosal lesion [5]. Overall, inflammation leads to the abnormal secretion of growth and inflammatory cytokines and excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that in turn may predispose toward carcinogenesis [7].

The first-line therapy of UC initiates with mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid), which may also prevent CRC development [8]. If this treatment does not sufficiently affect, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, biologics (such as anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antibodies, anti-integrin antibodies, anti-interleukin (IL) 12–23 antibodies), and/or non-biologic small molecule tofacitinib may be applied [9]. Despite these medications, an appreciable number of patients undergo persistent flares of inflammation or experience a medication-resistant disease with chronic inflammatory action. In such patients, once no “mucosal healing” (full remission) can be successfully accomplished, the chronic inflammation repeatedly damages the mucosa epithelial surface. The epithelial loss has to be compensated by the elevated proliferation of epithelial cells as a repair mechanism which may eventually be uncontrolled and cause CRC. Consequently, the CRC risk is elevated after a long duration of disease, particularly in patients with chronic active disease [7]. Thus, managing the immune responses can facilitate UC treatment and prevent CRC development.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy is a novel treatment strategy for cancer and a wide range of diseases with an excessive immune response, such as UC, due to the powerful immunomodulation and immunosuppression properties of MSCs and their capacity for tissue regeneration and repair [10]. As discussed in the following subsections, various kinds of MSCs can provide beneficial effects for treating UC and CRC. The therapeutic mechanism of MSCs mainly focuses on cell-to-cell interaction and paracrine activities. One of the potential therapeutic opportunities can focus on MSC-derived exosomes (MSC-Exo), which have been identified as a type of paracrine interaction, exerting strong immunomodulatory effects. Recent studies suggest that the therapeutic impact of MSCs is majorly dependent on exosomes [11]. In light of a wide variety of recent experimental investigations, the present review aims to seek the recent research advances of therapies based on MSC-Exo for UC and CRC. To this end, we firstly in the next subsection describe an overview regarding the therapeutic potential and challenges of MSCs and then in the following sections would discuss the protective and therapeutic impacts of exosomes derived from different sources of MSCs in UC and CRC.

The MSC therapy

MSCs can be isolated from various tissues such as the adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and bone marrow. These cells keep pluripotency, transforming into chondroblasts, myocytes, osteoblasts, and adipocytes. MSCs have been found to exert an immunosuppressive impact via polarizing anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages and decreasing both neutrophils and dendritic cells through IL-10 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) at the wound site [12]. MSCs are also able to decrease the activity of T and B lymphocytes via modulating their differentiation and proliferation [13, 14].

In preclinical studies, treatment with different sources of MSCs, including bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) [15,16,17], adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) [17,18,19], human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) [20], amnion-derived MSCs (AM-MSCs) [21], and tonsil-derived MSCs (TN-MSCs) [22], have shown protective effects against inflammation and chronic colitis and facilitated mucosal permeability reconstruction in animals with experimental IBD (Table 1). MSCs were found to migrate to lymph nodes to provide immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive responses and thereby exert therapeutic impacts on IBD [10]. They can also home to the intestinal muscularis to cause amelioration of IBD through the colon tissue repair [10, 23]. There have also been several phases I/II/III clinical trials that showed transplantation of both autologous and allogeneic MSCs could significantly ameliorate IBD (Table 2). The local (NCT01144962) and intravenous (NCT01090817) administration of BM-MSCs showed no severe adverse events and could significantly induce healing of perianal fistulas and decrease local and systemic inflammation and scores of disease activity index (DAI) in IBD patients [24,25,26,27,28]. In multicenter phase I/IIa [29] and phase III clinical trials (NCT01541579 and NCT01915927), human AD-MSCs transplantation safely achieved remission with long-term healing in IBD patients with treatment–refractory complex perianal fistulas [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In addition, hUC-MSCs administration was also found to alleviate endoscopic indices and inhibit lymphoid infiltration via inducing immunosuppressive responses in patients with refractory IBD [36].

Table 1 Preclinical findings of the MSCs therapy in the experimental IBD
Full size table
Table 2 Clinical findings of the MSCs therapy in IBD patients
Full size table

Besides, MSCs have also been found to exert a certain therapeutic impact on CRC. MSCs could prolong patients' survival time who suffered from metastatic tumors and complications caused by CRC [37]. MSCs therapy was also found to prevent CRC development in UC patients via suppressing chronic inflammation, as well as exerting a chemoprophylaxis role [38]. In the tumor microenvironment, MSCs have been found to regulate the immunologic functions by altering the cytokines secreted from immune cells such as T cells [39].

Nevertheless, various problems have been evidenced in clinical trials of MSCs for UC and CRC treatment. Of note, the important limiting challenge is the low therapeutic efficiency of MSCs due to their low survival rate and immunosuppressive potential in the process of migration to the intestinal mucosa [10]. To circumvent these limitations, various valid MSCs engineering approaches have been employed for UC and CRC. These include pretreatments that improve immunomodulation activity and homing. For instance, engineered MSCs expressing high levels of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) [40] or interferon-γ (IFN-γ) [41] showed the enhanced immunosuppressive activity leading to effective amelioration of colonic inflammation in colitis mice. In addition, TLR3-preconditioned hUC-MSCs were found to secrete extra immunosuppressive cytokines and inhibit proliferation of active T cells and thus showed a higher therapeutic efficiency, compared with un-preconditioned hUC-MSCs, to ameliorate the clinical and histopathological severity of acute UC in a murine model of IBD [42]. In another study, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA)-pretreated BM-MSCs have significantly improved immunomodulatory activity by downregulation of Th17 cells and upregulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) via the 15d-PGJ2/PPARγ/TGF-β1 pathway [43]. Of note, ASA-pretreated BM-MSCs markedly alleviated colonic inflammation and the DAI score in mice with experimental UC [43]. Some pretreatments have been also used to improve homing of MSCs. Receptor CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) plays a key role in chemotaxis and stem cell homing through interaction with its specific ligand stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1). It was reported that over-expression of CXCR4 could increase in vivo migration and engraftment of MSCs into the inflamed colon where these cells act as an immunomodulatory and/or anti-inflammatory component of the immune system in mice with experimental UC [44].

MSCs have been found to exert their role through the cell-to-cell and paracrine interactions. Paracrine active substances suppress the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of Th1 and Th17 cells and other immune cells so as to prevent excessive immunity. Exosomes, a kind of MSCs paracrine, have also been found to be capable of replacing MSCs in the treatment of UC and CRC in recent years.

Exosomes

Exosomes are lipid bilayer extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by a broad range of cell types such as MSCs. These vesicles mirror the molecular content of donor cells and participate in cellular cross talk between both neighboring and distant cells. Exosome-mediated intercellular communication stems from its capacity in cell-to-cell transferring of biological information. The composition of the exosomes is highly dependent on the parental cells and their biogenesis pathways. This composition determines the function of the exosomes. Some components exist in almost all exosomes, and some are tissue- and cell-specific [45, 46]. In general, the exosomes are enriched in DNA, mRNA, microRNAs (miRs), and bioactive proteins which can mediate the functions of exosomes [47] (Fig. 1). Stem cell-derived exosomes have been demonstrated to not only reiterate the therapeutic properties of origin cells but also donate advantages over them [48]. They show the potential to overcome limitations of stem cell therapy, like restricted engraftment and low survival rate of stem cells, risk of differentiation into undesired cell lines and development of ectopic tissues, risk of tumorigenicity and genetic aberrations, as well as ethical and safety challenges [48]. Notably, exosomes have autonomous targeting capabilities and can home to a specific lesion tissue [48]. Exosomes have been found to internalize in a cell type-specific route that relies on recognition of exosomal surface ligands/receptors by the target cell or tissue. As discussed in the following sections, a growing number of preclinical investigations indicates that exosomes derived from various sources of MSCs could exert anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects on UC (Tables 3, 4 and Fig. 2) and CRC (Table 3 and Fig. 3). Thus, the present review aimed to highlight stem cell-derived exosomes reported as the potential therapeutic tools for treating UC and CRC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic depicting the biogenesis, structure, and major molecular components of exosomes. Exosomes are lipid bilayer extracellular vesicles with diameters typically between 30 and 120 nm. Exosome biogenesis initiates when a portion of the plasma membrane buds into the cell to create an early endosome that transforms into late endosomes termed multivesicular bodies (MVB) containing a large number of exosomes. In the meantime, transmembrane and surface proteins located on the plasma membrane are placed into the invaginating membrane, while the cytosolic biologics are enveloped within the exosomes. After fusion with the plasma membrane and through the exocytosis, MVBs release the exosomes into the extracellular space. The payload of exosomes can include proteins, cytoskeletal proteins, signaling molecules, receptors, ligand, tetraspanins, miRs, mRNAs, and other bioactive compounds. They can also carry various immunoregulatory (like miRs) and immunosuppressive (like surface proteins) as well as anti-tumor (like miRs) and tumorigenic (like surface proteins) mediators

Full size image
Table 3 The biological characteristics of stem cell-derived exosomes in experimental CRC and UC
Full size table
Table 4 Therapeutic theory of MSCs-derived exosomes in the experimental UC
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The modulatory effect of MSC-Exo on the dysregulated immune system components in the experimental UC. The hUC-MSC-Exo inhibit inflammatory macrophages while promoting the anti-inflammatory activity of Th2 cells. Over-activated Th1/Th17 cells can be suppressed by hBM-MSC-Exo, hUC-MSC-Exo, and OE-MSC-Exo. The anti-inflammation activity of Treg cells can be improved by hBM-MSC-Exo, hAD-MSC-Exo, and OE-MSC-Exo. Over-expressed proinflammatory cytokines and hUC-MSC-Exo, hAD-MSC-Exo, and OE-MSC-Exo can reduce over-expressed proinflammatory cytokines while increasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

A schematic view of the exosome therapy for CRC treatment using MSC-derived exosomes containing tumor-suppressive miRs

Full size image

The search strategy

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed), Scopus (http://www.scopus.com), and Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com), without any language restrictions, to identify all published articles dealing with the aims of the present study. The search was performed from inception to December 2021 using the terms [(“colorectal cancer” OR “bowel cancer” OR “colon cancer” OR “rectal cancer”) AND (exosome) AND (stem cell) AND (“inflammatory bowel disease” OR “Crohn's disease” OR “colitis”)] in titles and abstracts.

The therapeutic potential of MSC-derived exosomes in UC treatment

Exosomes from human UC-MSCs

hUC-MSCs have been found to play a key role in the formation of tissue regeneration from inflammation and tissue damage. There is growing preclinical evidence that indicates exosomes derived from hUC-MSCs (hUC-MSC-Exo) can mediate therapeutic effects of hUC-MSCs and protect against tissue damage in UC [49,50,51,52].

It was shown that intravenously injected hUC-MSC-Exo can home to the colon tissue and, subsequently, increase the survival rate and alleviate the severity of UC symptoms, including the colon shortening, the destroyed integrity of colon structure, and the increased infiltration of inflammatory cells in colitis mice by regulating the inflammatory responses [49, 50]. The infiltration of inflammatory cells, particularly macrophages, is a hallmark feature of UC. Inflammatory M1 macrophages can secrete various proinflammatory cytokines and enzymes, which would lead to the damage of colon tissue. Of note, it was shown that the recruitment of macrophages to the inflamed colon and the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-7, TNF-α, and iNOS, were significantly decreased in hUC-MSC-Exo-administrated colitis mice, while the expression of anti-inflammatory mediators, such as IL-10 and IP-10, was significantly increased [49, 50]. Notably, the hUC-MSC-Exo were found to ameliorate the inflammation and UC symptoms through regulating the modification of ubiquitination [49]. Ubiquitination, a process by which the target protein is modified by ubiquitin molecules, plays a regulatory role in numerous biological functions such as inflammatory responses in UC [53, 54]. The ubiquitin-associated molecules such as K48, K63, and FK2 are known to promote inflammation through activating NF-κB and mTOR signaling pathways, and hUC-MSC-Exo administration markedly decreased the protein expression of these molecules in the colon tissue of colitis mice [49]. Further, it was shown that the gene expression levels of ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 3 (Uba3), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2M (UBE2M), and NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 (NAe1) as the central components of the ubiquitination were profoundly decreased in hUC-MSC-Exo-administrated mice, supporting the role of ubiquitin modification in anti-inflammatory effects of hUC-MSC-Exo in UC [49].

On the other hand, macrophage pyroptosis, a process of cell death through induction of NLRP3 (NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain-containing 3) inflammasomes, has been found to partially account for inflammatory responses in colitis. There have also been experimental studies that showed hUC-MSC-Exo alleviated UC by regulating macrophage pyroptosis via the miR-378a-5p/NLRP3 axis [51]. Of note, the in vivo study indicated that intravenous administration of hUC-MSC-Exo containing high levels of miR-378a-5p could suppress the expression of NLRP3 inflammasome-related molecules, including pattern recognition receptor NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), caspase-1, IL-1β, and IL-18, in colitis mice. This resulted in the reduction in macrophage pyroptosis in the mouse colon and protection against colitis [51]. The same result was found through the in vitro cell experiments, where the co-culture of hUC-MSC-Exo with human myeloid leukemia mononuclear (THP-1) cells and mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs) caused the reduced expression of NLRP3 inflammasomes and the elevated cell survival [51].

Another in vivo study showed that intraperitoneal administration of hUC-MSC-Exo ameliorated UC symptoms and decreased the mortality rate in colitis mice. It was found that hUC-MSC-Exo protect against UC through restoring the intestinal function and intestinal immune homeostasis via TNF-α-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6), a glycoprotein with the capacities of tissue repair and immune regulation [52]. The intestinal barrier, which is disrupted in UC, includes tight junctions (TJs) from the intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and the mucus layer [55]. The TJ proteins, mainly including claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1, are essential for maintaining the integrity and function of the intestinal barrier [56]. Mucus is generated and released by goblet cells in the IECs [56], and mucosal permeability will be elevated after the disruption of the intestinal barrier [57]. Of note, the protective effect of hUC-MSC-Exo on the intestinal barrier was substantiated by the increased number of goblet cells and reduced permeability of intestinal mucosa. Such an alleviating effect was accompanied by improving the impaired structure of TJ and microvilli, as well as elevating the expression of TJ proteins in the colon tissue [52]. In the case of intestinal inflammation, microarray analysis indicated that hUC-MSC-Exo treatment upregulated the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines, including chemokine ligand 14 (CXCL14), IL-1β, IL-11, and IL-12 and downregulated the pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-4 and TGF-β, in the colonic mucosal [52]. Moreover, the imbalance of T cell subtypes has a key role in the onset and progression of UC [58]. Notably, hUC-MSC-Exo also elevated the anti-inflammatory response of Th2 cells and decreased the pro-inflammatory response of Th17 cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes [52]. Mechanistically, TSG-6 was identified to be one of the key mediators of the therapeutic activity of hUC-MSC-Exo in UC [52]. It can be further supported by other investigations that showed the therapeutic effect of stem cells in IBD animals is majorly mediated via TSG-6 [59,60,61]. Indeed, TSG-6 is a secreted protein that has tissue-protective and anti-inflammatory features [62, 63]; after sensing the inflammatory signal, the corresponding cell secretes TSG-6 to the injury site to inhibit immune response and repair the injured tissue [64, 65].

Exosomes from human AD-MSCs

Exosomes derived from human AD-MSC (hAD-MSC-Exo) have been reported to efficiently repair damaged tissues, such as adipose tissue inflammation [66] and cutaneous wounds [67]. A recent experimental study revealed that hAD-MSC-Exo can also exert a protective role against UC in experimental colitis. It was reported that intravenously injected hAD-MSC-Exo could home to the inflammatory site of the colorectal tissue and, subsequently, attenuate the severity of UC in colitis mice [68]. Of note, the typical symptoms of UC, such as the loss of body weight, alterations of colon length, colonic inflammation, and rectal bleeding, were dramatically attenuated by hAD-MSC-Exo administration [68]. hAD-MSC-Exo-administrated mice maintained relative integrity of colon structure with no apparent ulceration and showed less inflammatory cell infiltration and less crypt loss, as well as lower histological scores of DAI during the disease progression [68]. hAD-MSC-Exo also increased levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-13) and decreased the pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α) in both colon tissue and peripheral blood serum [68]. Notably, hAD-MSC-Exo maintained the colonic integrity by reshaping the cell structure in colon mucosa via inducing the regeneration and proliferation of intestinal stem cells, epithelial cells, and goblet cells in colon crypts [68]. This finding is in agreement with the report of another study that indicated the intraperitoneal injection of exosomes derived from mouse AD-MSC (mAD-MSC-Exo) can mediate a significant immunomodulatory effect and, consequently, attenuate the DAI score and the severity of symptoms including bleeding, colon shortening, colon injury, and body weight loss in mice with acute colitis [69]. Of note, mAD-MSC-Exo administration could decrease the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IFN‐γ, TNF‐α, IL‐12, and IL‐17, and increase percentages of anti-inflammatory Treg cells and the anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL‐4, IL‐10, and TGF‐β in lymph node and spleen of colitis mice [69].

Exosomes from BM-MSCs

Some findings show that IFN-γ treatment can efficiently improve the therapeutic potential of MSCs against colitis via enhancing their immunomodulation activity by affecting MSC-secreted exosomes. A recent study reported that the systemic infusion of exosomes derived from BM-MSCs (BM-MSC-Exo) could significantly ameliorate body weight loss, colon shortening, and the DAI score of colitis and reduce the ratio of the Th17 cells with an increased ratio of Treg cells in colitis mice [70]. Interestingly, administration of exosomes derived from IFN-γ-primed BM-MSC revealed superior improving impacts to colitis [70]. Histologically, the intestinal structure, which was impaired with epithelial ulceration, aberrant crypt architecture, and inflammatory cell infiltration, was restored more efficiently in colitis mice treated with IFN-γ-primed BM-MSC-Exo than non-primed ones [70]. It was found that the therapeutic effects of exosomes on colitis are partly mediated by the reciprocal regulation of Th17 and Treg cells. Mechanistically, the exosome treatment was found to significantly decrease the Stat3 expression to inhibit differentiation of Th17 cells, which also might result in an increased number of Treg cells [70]. Of note, exosomal miR-125a and miR-125b were found to directly target and inhibit Stat3 and consequently repress the Th17 differentiation, whereby resulted in attenuating symptoms of colitis in exosome-administrated mice. Notably, IFN-γ pretreatment could intensify the capacity of BM-MSC-Exo to ameliorate colitis phenotypes in the mouse model by upregulation of miR-125a and miR-125b expression [70].

Exosomes from olfactory ecto-MSCs

Olfactory ecto-MSCs (OE-MSCs) are a novel population of resident stem cells in the olfactory lamina propria with considerable immunosuppressive activity. In colitis mice, the intravenous administration of exosomes derived from OE-MSCs (OE-MSC-Exo) markedly increased the colon length, reduced the DAI score and inflammation, and retained the integral structure of the colon, and with less lymphocytic infiltration, decreased the crypt loss and lowered the histopathological scores [71]. The ameliorative effect of OE-MSC-Exo on the disease severity was accompanied by diminished Th1/Th17 cell pro-inflammatory responses and enhanced Treg cell anti-inflammatory responses [71]. Mechanistically, OE-MSC-Exo administration was found to exert immunomodulatory effects by suppressing differentiation of Th1/Th17 cells and inducing the differentiation of Treg cells as well as inhibiting T cell proliferation via reducing IL-17 and IFN-γ and enhancing TGF-β and IL-10 production by the T cells [71].

The therapeutic potential of MSC-Exo in the CRC treatment

Several investigations have evaluated the effects of MSCs on CRC; however, the results are controversial. Some investigations have shown the inhibitory effect of MSCs on cancer cell proliferation and migration, while others reported the supportive effects (Table 5 and Fig. 3). There is evidence that shows the dual function of MSCs on cancer cells is due to their secretome, mainly exosomes. Indeed, it has been found that the cargo content of MSC-derived exosomes (MSC-Exo) can majorly determine the effects of MSCs on cancer cells. Of note, MSC-Exo containing anti-tumor mediators can inhibit the tumor growth and, thus, show potentiality as a therapeutic tool, while those contacting tumorigenic mediators can promote the tumor growth and, thus, have potential as the therapeutic target in cancer treatment. On the other hand, MSC-Exo, due to their lipid bilayer membrane, provide a suitable delivery vector that can protect therapeutic molecules from degradation. Therefore, potential MSC-Exo-based therapeutic approaches can be categorized into three groups including using tumor suppressor MSC-Exo as therapeutic tools, suppressing tumorigenic MSC-Exo as the therapeutic target, and using MSC-Exo as therapeutic carriers. In the following sections, we discuss such MSC-Exo-based therapeutic approaches in the CRC treatment.

Table 5 Therapeutic MSCs-derived Exo-miRs in CRC treatment
Full size table

MSC-Exo as potential therapeutic tools for the CRC treatment

There is growing evidence that shows exosomes isolated from different sources of MSCs can exert a suppressive effect on CRC progression. It was reported that hUC-MSCs administration could promote the differentiation of Treg cells by activating Smad2 signaling so as to suppress the colitis and inhibit the development of colitis-associated CRC [38]. Further studies indicated that exosomes from hUC-MSCs delivered high levels of miR-3940-5p into CRC cells which directly downregulated the integrin alpha 6 (ITGA6) expression, by which suppressing the invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of CRC cells in vitro and inhibiting the tumor growth and metastasis in vivo [72]. Mechanistically, ITGA6 expression has been found to involve in cancer progression and metastasis [73,74,75] by regulating the tumor microenvironment and maintaining tumor cells [76]. Other reports showed that BM-MSCs could significantly ameliorate the colitis-associated CRC and then lengthen the colon and relieve weight loss in the IBD mice by inhibiting activation of STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 in the colon tissue [77, 78]. The suppressive effect of BM-MSCs on inflammation-mediated tumorigenesis in the colon was supported by another study that demonstrated that BM-MSCs administration could inhibit the progression of CRC in rat models by modulating immune components and reducing the immune-related inflammation in the tumor microenvironment [79]. Notably, BM-MSC-Exo have been found to be rich in miR-22-3p which is a tumor suppressor and represses the proliferation and progression of tumors. miR-22-3p was shown to downregulate the expression levels of specificity protein 1 (Sp1) [80] and astrocyte-elevated gene-1(AEG-1) [81], consequently suppressing the tumor cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma [80] and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [81]. Of note, it was reported that Exo-miR-22-3p derived from human BM-MSCs (hBM-MSCs) could suppress CRC cell proliferation and invasion by regulating RAP2B/PI3K/AKT pathway in SW480 cancer cell line [82]. In this line, another in vitro study reported that BM-MSC-Exo containing a high level of miR‐16‐5p suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion, while simultaneously inducing the apoptosis of the CRC cells via downregulation of ITGA2 [83]. It was further supported by in vivo experiments that showed the administration of BM-MSCs‐Exo overexpressing miR‐16‐5p could decrease the expression of ITGA2 in tumor tissues and, thereby, significantly reduce the volume and growth ability of CRC tumor. Notably, the tumor-suppressive activity of miR‐16‐5p has been already confirmed by other studies that showed the miR‐16‐5p expression was downregulated, while the expression of its oncogenic targets, ITGA2 and Smad3, was upregulated in various cancer cells such as gastric cancer [84, 85], pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [86], chordomas [87], and CRC [83], which was contributed to an unfavorable survival rate. Taken together, these findings suggest that therapeutic effects of MSCs on the CRC may be attributable to secreted exosomes enriched in tumor-suppressive miRs (Table 5). Notably, the exosome therapy using hUC-MSC-Exo containing miR-3940-5p and BM-MSC-Exo containing miR-22-3p and miR‐16‐5p, or elevating the CRC expression of such tumor-suppressive miRs can be a promising approach for treating patients with CRC in the future clinical practices.

MSC-Exo as potential therapeutic targets for the CRC treatment

Despite evidence for inhibitory effects of MSCs and MSC-Exo, there are also reports that show their promoting effects in the progression of CRC in animal models, suggesting them as potential therapeutic targets that their inhibition can provide a valuable approach in the treatment of CRC. MSCs have been found to exert tumorigenic activities on CRC through various mechanisms including inhibiting the cell apoptosis and promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [88, 89] as well as inducing angiogenesis [90,91,92] and drug resistance [93, 94].

There is growing evidence showing that MSC secretome, particularly exosomes, mediates the supporting role of MSCs in cancer cell growth and metastasis [95]. An in vitro study of CRC cell lines cultured in hBM-MSCs conditioned media indicated that the secretory fraction of hBM-MSCs strongly induced the progression of the cancer cells by enhancing cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation through AMPK/mTOR-mediated NF-κB activation [96]. A recent in vitro study reported that exosomes secreted from hBM-MSCs could induce CRC development through transporting miR-424 into colon cells [97]. The Exo-miR-424 was found to accelerate the progression of CRC by targeting the tumor suppressor receptor TGFBR3 [97]. Of note, miR-424 has been already known as a tumorigenic miR that is highly overexpressed in several human cancer cells including NSCLC [98], tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) [99], and also CRC [95, 100]. It was shown that miR-424 was upregulated, while TGFBR3 was downregulated in CRC tissues and cell lines [95]. Importantly, the expression of miR-424 and TGFBR3 was also found to be correlated with tumor differentiation degree, tumor infiltration depth, TNM (tumor, node, and metastasis) stage, vascular invasion, as well as lymphatic node metastasis (LNM), and distant metastasis in CRC patients [97]. Notably, it was shown that inhibition of miR-424 could limit the development of CRC via overexpressing TGFBR3 [95]. The inhibition of miR-424 and overexpression of TGFBR3 could suppress migration and invasion of CRC cells, arrest the CRC cells at G0/G1 phase, and induce CRC cell apoptosis, while BMSC-Exo exerted an inverse effect [97]. Furthermore, it was also reported that BM-MSC-Exo containing miR-142-3p significantly increase the population of colon cancer stem cells (CSCs) in CRC cells [101]. Of note, depriving miR-142-3p from BM-MSC-Exo clearly reduced the population of CSCs [101]. Mechanistically, Numb, a suppressor of the Notch signaling pathway, was identified to be the target gene of miR-142-3p. Indeed, miR-142-3p downregulates the Numb expression and, thereby, induces the expression of Notch target genes, such as Cyclin D3, P21, and Hes1, resulting in promoting the CSC phenotype [101]. Collectively, these findings indicate hBM-MSC-Exo-miR-424 and Exo-miR-142-3p as the promising therapeutic targets (Table 5) whose inhibition may provide a novel strategy in CRC treatment. Notably, inhibiting tumorigenic miR-424 and miR-142-3p in exosomes from hBM-MSCs may suppress tumorigenic activity of such exosomes and restore therapeutic activity of hBM-MSC-Exo mentioned in the last section,

In addition, another study reported that exosomes from human CRC-derived MSCs (hCC-MSC-Exo) could constitute a key cell-to-cell cross talk in tumor stroma that supports tumor growth and progression (Table 4) [102]. Screening the miR profiles indicated that the levels of oncogenic miR-30a and miR-222 are markedly enriched in hCC-MSC-Exo [102]. Of note, it was shown that Exo-miR-30a and Exo-miR-222 secreted from hCC-MSCs are efficiently delivered into the CRCs [102] where directly target tumor-suppressive protein MIA3 and downregulate its expression to induce the ability of colon cells to proliferate, migrate, and metastasize [102, 103]. Importantly, suppressing both miR-30a and miR-222 could reverse the tumor promotion effect of hCC-MSC-Exo in colon cancer cells [102]. To sum up, these findings suggest that the blockade of the exosomal transfer of tumorigenic miR-30a and miR-222 by hCC-MSCs can provide a promising approach to inhibit the progression of CRC.

A useful tool to efficiently knock down the function of a specific miR in cells or exosomes is direct transfection of chemically synthesized miR inhibitors, commonly referred to as miR decoys, miR sponges, AMOs (anti-miRNA antisense oligonucleotides), and antagomirs or anti-miRs. Generally, these are antisense molecules that, through complementary sequences, bind and sequester specific miRs from their mRNA targets. Miravirsen, a specific inhibitor of miR-122, is the major example and first miR inhibitor AMO drug that entered clinical trials for treating hepatitis C [104].

MSC-Exo as therapeutic carriers for the CRC treatment

Exosomes hold great potential as the carrier of therapeutic agents for the tumor-targeted therapy [105,106,107,108,109,110,111], due to their low immunogenicity, high biocompatibility and stability, high encapsulation capacity, and facilitating internalization of the cargo into tumor cells. Moreover, exosomes are able to be easily decorated with particular ligands on their surface to improve targeting to the tumor microenvironment [112,113,114].

Genetic materials, such as anti-tumor miRs or siRNAs, have been found to be efficiently encapsulated into MSC-Exo by the transfection approach [110, 111, 115]. Han and colleagues studied exosomes from human cord blood-derived MSCs as a targeted delivery system for AMOs in CRC therapy [104]. They employed electroporation to load anti-miR-122 (miravirsen) into the exosomes decorated by iRGD peptides that endow exosomes with highly efficient tissue penetration abilities and a specific binding ability to tumor cells [104]. The iRGD peptide accelerates drug delivery into tumor cells. As a ligand, the iRGD peptide can target tumor cells expressing high levels of the neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) receptor, mediates the penetration into the cell membrane, and efficiently kills tumor cells [109, 114, 116]. Of note, NRP-1 was identified to be strongly expressed in colon cancer cell lineages and tissues, permitting the iRGD-Exo-antimiR-122 to be effectively ingested by colon cancer cells and significantly inhibiting tumor growth in vitro and in vivo [104]. Notably, iRGD-Exo-antimiR-122 was shown to be highly enriched in tumor sites and exerted excellent anti-tumor efficacy in a xenograft CRC model [104].

There is also another study that used the modified BM-MSC-Exo as a carrier for doxorubicin (Dox) in targeted therapy of CRC in an animal model. Of note, Dox-loaded BM-MSC-Exo were decorated with the carboxylic acid-end MUC1 aptamer (5TR1) to provide selective guided drug delivery into CRC cells. The 5TR1-BM-MSC-Exo could highly enhance the anti-tumor activity of Dox against CRC both in vitro and in vivo while decreasing its toxicity on non-targeted cells and tissues. The targeted Dox-BM-MSC-Exo showed higher tumor accumulation and faster liver clearance in comparison with free DOX, suggesting it as a valuable platform for the safe and versatile delivery of DOX to CRC in the clinical application [117].

Concluding remarks, challenges, and future perspectives

An overall conclusion from the above preclinical findings indicates that MSC-Exo can provide a novel therapeutic approach in treating UC and CRC. Although both UC and CRC have an inflammatory pathological basement and UC is the main risk factor for CRC development, MSC-Exo can exert the protective role against UC and CRC through two different mechanisms including modulating immune responses and inducing anti-tumor responses, respectively. Of note, exosomes as a cell-free delivery system have advantages over the corresponding stem cells: exosomes are smaller and less complex than stem cells and show the potential to circumvent some shortcomings of stem cells, such as the need for a persistent administration of cells with stable phenotype, tumorigenicity and immune rejection, ectopic tissue formation, and the infusional toxicity caused by transplanted cells.

Of note, hUC-MSC-Exo have been found to ameliorate the experimental UC through inhibiting infiltration and function of inflammatory macrophages, suppressing the differentiation of inflammatory Th17 cells, reducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, as well as inducing the differentiation of anti-inflammatory Th2 cells and enhancing the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines. However, the anti-tumor activity of hUC-MSC-Exo on CRC cells is attributed to the existence of tumor-suppressive miR-3940-5p that can suppress the growth, invasion, and metastasis of CRC through downregulating the expression of oncoprotein ITGA6.

Moreover, it has been found that IFN-γ-primed BM-MSC-Exo contain high levels of miR-125a and miR-125b that can ameliorate colitis phenotypes through inhibiting differentiation of Th17 cells and promoting the proliferation of Treg cells via downregulating the Stat3 expression. Notably, BM-MSC-Exo containing tumor-suppressive miRs, including miR-22-3p and miR‐16‐5p, have been shown to suppress proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRC cells via regulation of RAP2B/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and ITGA2. Thus, BM-MSC-Exo containing miR-125a/miR-125b or miR-22-3p/miR‐16‐5p have the valuable potential as therapeutic tools for treating UC or CRC, respectively. Besides, there is also a report that shows BM-MSC-Exo can induce CRC development through transporting tumorigenic miR-424 into colon cells, suggesting Exo-miR-424 as a promising therapeutic target whose inhibition may provide a novel strategy in CRC treatment.

On the other hand, there have also been reports that show the therapeutic potential of exosomes derived from other sources of MSCs, including AD-MSCs and OE-MSCs, in UC treatment; however, there is no report regarding their effect on CRC. It was shown that AD-MSC-Exo could attenuate typical symptoms of UC, decrease histological scores of DAI, improve colonic ulcers, decrease the infiltration of inflammatory cells and production of proinflammatory cytokines, and increase percentages of anti-inflammatory Treg cells and the anti-inflammatory cytokines in mice with acute colitis. OE-MSC-Exo could significantly ameliorate the severity of UC through immunomodulatory activity by suppressing Th1/Th17 cell pro-inflammatory responses and enhancing Treg cell anti-inflammatory responses. Thus, in addition to hUC-MSC-Exo and BM-MSC-Exo, the exosome therapy by AD-MSC-Exo and/or OE-MSC-Exo can donate a novel approach for UC treatment.

Of note, the safety and therapeutic efficiency of exosomes have been reported in preliminary clinical trials for treating CRC [118]; however, engineering of delivery properties can improve the therapeutic efficiency of exosomes in further clinical use. One of the main issues with exosome-based delivery systems is rapid clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES). Notably, the surface modification using “don’t eat me” signaling molecules like CD47 and PEG can reduce uptake by RES. Another highly attractive feature of exosomes as a drug delivery vehicle is their intrinsic homing capability to target tissues. Of note, decorating the exosome surface via specific ligands, such as the iRGD peptide or the carboxylic acid-end MUC1 aptamer, can elevate the local concentration of exosomes at the target disease cells or tissues, thereby minimizing side effects and the toxicity and maximizing therapeutic efficiency [104].

Moreover, there are still several drawbacks that limit the clinical application of exosome therapy in UC or CRC. Current challenges include the following: the technology of large-scale culture and isolation of MSCs; the optimal method for the long-term preservation of exosomes; the efficient and cost–benefit techniques to rapidly isolate, purify, quantitate, and identify exosomes; transplantation conditions of exosomes; as well as their cost. Thus, to facilitate the clinical use of exosome therapy in UC or CRC, more in-depth analysis for circumventing such problems is necessary.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Xi Y, Xu P. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl Oncol. 2021;14(10):101174.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alzahrani SM, Al Doghaither HA, Al-Ghafari AB. General insight into cancer: an overview of colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2021;15(6):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olén O, Erichsen R, Sachs MC, Pedersen L, Halfvarson J, Askling J, et al. Colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a Scandinavian population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 2020;395(10218):123–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jess T, Rungoe C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(6):639–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Souza HS, Fiocchi C, Iliopoulos D. The IBD interactome: an integrated view of aetiology, pathogenesis and therapy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(12):739–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caprioli F, Pallone F, Monteleone G. Th17 immune response in IBD: a new pathogenic mechanism. J Crohns Colitis. 2008;2(4):291–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(2):89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Paridaens K, Fullarton JR, Travis SP. Efficacy and safety of oral Pentasa (prolonged-release mesalazine) in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021;37(11):1891–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Bawardy B, Shivashankar R, Proctor DD. Novel and emerging therapies for inflammatory bowel disease. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:569.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang J, Zhang L, Luo X, Ma X, Wang G, Yang Y, et al. Systematic exposition of mesenchymal stem cell for inflammatory bowel disease and its associated colorectal cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jafari D, Malih S, Eslami SS, Jafari R, Darzi L, Tarighi P, et al. The relationship between molecular content of mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes and their potentials: opening the way for exosomes based therapeutics. Biochimie. 2019;165:76–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ren G, Zhang L, Zhao X, Xu G, Zhang Y, Roberts AI, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunosuppression occurs via concerted action of chemokines and nitric oxide. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(2):141–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005;105(4):1815–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferretti E, Giunti D, Cappiello V, Cazzanti F, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B-cell functions. Blood. 2006;107(1):367–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun T, Gao G-Z, Li R-F, Li X, Li D-W, Wu S-S, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation ameliorates oxidative stress and restores intestinal mucosal permeability in chemically induced colitis in mice. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7(5):891.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee HJ, Oh S-H, Jang HW, Kwon J-H, Lee KJ, Kim CH, et al. Long-term effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in dextran sulfate sodium-induced murine chronic colitis. Gut Liver. 2016;10(3):412.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stavely R, Robinson AM, Miller S, Boyd R, Sakkal S, Nurgali K. Human adult stem cells derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow attenuate enteric neuropathy in the guinea-pig model of acute colitis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1):1–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Jin Y, Lin Y, Lin L, Cao Y, Wang D, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate ulcerative colitis through miR-1236 negatively regulating the expression of retinoid-related orphan receptor gamma. DNA Cell Biol. 2015;34(10):618–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie M, Qin H, Luo Q, He X, He X, Lan P, et al. Comparison of adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in a murine model of Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(1):115–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HS, Shin TH, Lee BC, Yu KR, Seo Y, Lee S, et al. Human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells reduce colitis in mice by activating NOD2 signaling to COX2. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(6):1392-1403.e8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyamoto S, Ohnishi S, Onishi R, Tsuchiya I, Hosono H, Katsurada T, et al. Therapeutic effects of human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation and conditioned medium enema in rats with trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis. Am J Transl Res. 2017;9(3):940.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu Y, Song EM, Lee KE, Joo Y-H, Kim S-E, Moon CM, et al. Therapeutic potential of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells in dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental murine colitis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0183141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimizu H, Suzuki K, Watanabe M, Okamoto R. Stem cell-based therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Intest Res. 2019;17(3):311.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Molendijk I, Bonsing BA, Roelofs H, Peeters KC, Wasser MN, Dijkstra G, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cells promote healing of refractory perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(4):918-927.e6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Forbes GM, Sturm MJ, Leong RW, Sparrow MP, Segarajasingam D, Cummins AG, et al. A phase 2 study of allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells for luminal Crohn’s disease refractory to biologic therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(1):64–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duijvestein M, Vos AC, Roelofs H, Wildenberg ME, Wendrich BB, Verspaget HW, et al. Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell treatment for refractory luminal Crohn’s disease: results of a phase I study. Gut. 2010;59(12):1662–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dhere T, Copland I, Garcia M, Chiang KY, Chinnadurai R, Prasad M, et al. The safety of autologous and metabolically fit bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in medically refractory Crohn’s disease: a phase 1 trial with three doses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(5):471–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kniazev O, Parfenov A, Ruchkina I, Lazebnik L, Sagynbaeva VÉ. Immune response to biological therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases. Ter Arkh. 2013;85(12):55–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de la Portilla F, Alba F, García-Olmo D, Herrerías JM, González FX, Galindo A. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) for the treatment of complex perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: results from a multicenter phase I/IIa clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(3):313–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Panés J, García-Olmo D, Van Assche G, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Baumgart DC, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(5):1334-1342.e4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Panés J, García-Olmo D, Van Assche G, Colombel JF, Reinisch W, Baumgart DC, et al. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1281–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee WY, Park KJ, Cho YB, Yoon SN, Song KH, Kim DS, et al. Autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells treatment demonstrated favorable and sustainable therapeutic effect for Crohn’s fistula. Stem Cells. 2013;31(11):2575–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietz AB, Dozois EJ, Fletcher JG, Butler GW, Radel D, Lightner AL, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells, applied in a bioabsorbable matrix, for treatment of perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(1):59-62.e2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cho YB, Lee WY, Park KJ, Kim M, Yoo H-W, Yu CS. Autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells for the treatment of Crohn’s fistula: a phase I clinical study. Cell Transplant. 2013;22(2):279–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. De la Portilla F, Alba F, García-Olmo D, Herrerías J, González F, Galindo A. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) for the treatment of complex perianal fistula in Crohn’s disease: results from a multicenter phase I/IIa clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(3):313–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liang J, Zhang H, Wang D, Feng X, Wang H, Hua B, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in seven patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2012;61(3):468–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang D, Zheng L, Shi H, Chen X, Wan Y, Zhang H, et al. Suppression of peritoneal tumorigenesis by placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells expressing endostatin on colorectal cancer. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(9):870.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang R, Shen S, Zhao X, Nie Y, Xu Y, Ren J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells-regulated Treg cells suppress colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hendijani F, Javanmard SH. Dual protective and cytotoxic benefits of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in combination with chemotherapy/radiotherapy for cancer patients. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2015;25(3):203–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu T, Liu Y, Fan Z, Xu J, Jin L, Gao Z, et al. miR-21 modulates the immunoregulatory function of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through the PTEN/Akt/TGF-β1 pathway. Stem Cells. 2015;33(11):3281–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Y, Song Y, Miao H, Xu Y, Lv M, Wang T, et al. Gene delivery with IFN-γ-expression plasmids enhances the therapeutic effects of MSCs on DSS-induced mouse colitis. Inflamm Res. 2015;64(9):671–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fuenzalida P, Kurte M, Fernandez-O’Ryan C, Ibañez C, Gauthier-Abeliuk M, Vega-Letter AM, et al. Toll-like receptor 3 pre-conditioning increases the therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells in a dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis model. Cytotherapy. 2016;18(5):630–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang J, Xiong J, Wu T, Tang Z, Ding G, Zhang C, et al. Aspirin treatment improved mesenchymal stem cell immunomodulatory properties via the 15d-PGJ2/PPARγ/TGF-β1 pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23(17):2093–103.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu X, Zuo D, Fan H, Tang Q, Shou Z, Cao D, et al. Over-expression of CXCR4 on mesenchymal stem cells protect against experimental colitis via immunomodulatory functions in impaired tissue. J Mol Histol. 2014;45(2):181–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jafari D, Shajari S, Jafari R, Mardi N, Gomari H, Ganji F, et al. Designer exosomes: a new platform for biotechnology therapeutics. BioDrugs. 2020;34:567–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Niel G, Porto-Carreiro I, Simoes S, Raposo G. Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function. J Biochem. 2006;140(1):13–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Alzhrani GN, Alanazi ST, Alsharif SY, Albalawi AM, Alsharif AA, Abdel-Maksoud MS, et al. Exosomes: isolation, characterization, and biomedical applications. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45:1807–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wei W, Ao Q, Wang X, Cao Y, Liu Y, Zheng SG, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: a promising biological tool in nanomedicine. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:1954.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wu Y, Qiu W, Xu X, Kang J, Wang J, Wen Y, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate inflammatory bowel disease in mice through ubiquitination. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(7):2026.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Mao F, Wu Y, Tang X, Kang J, Zhang B, Yan Y, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells relieve inflammatory bowel disease in mice. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Cai X, Zhang Z, Yuan J, Ocansey DKW, Tu Q, Zhang X, et al. hucMSC-derived exosomes attenuate colitis by regulating macrophage pyroptosis via the miR-378a-5p/NLRP3 axis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):416.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang S, Liang X, Song J, Li C, Liu A, Luo Y, et al. A novel therapeutic approach for inflammatory bowel disease by exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells to repair intestinal barrier via TSG-6. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):315.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim Y, Jho E. Regulation of the Hippo signaling pathway by ubiquitin modification. BMB Rep. 2018;51(3):143.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Cleynen I, Vazeille E, Artieda M, Verspaget HW, Szczypiorska M, Bringer M-A, et al. Genetic and microbial factors modulating the ubiquitin proteasome system in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2014;63(8):1265–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gong Y, Li H, Li Y. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on epithelial tight junctions of mice with inflammatory bowel disease. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2016;36(2):75–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang M, Jia W, Wang D, Han F, Niu W, Zhang H, et al. Effects and mechanism of constitutive TL1A expression on intestinal mucosal barrier in DSS-induced colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(7):1844–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yin A, Luo Y, Chen W, He M, Deng JH, Zhao N, et al. FAM96A protects mice from dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis by preventing microbial dysbiosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:381.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Imam T, Park S, Kaplan MH, Olson MR. Effector T helper cell subsets in inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1212.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Sala E, Genua M, Petti L, Anselmo A, Arena V, Cibella J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce colitis in mice via release of TSG6, independently of their localization to the intestine. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(1):163-176.e20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang H, Feng R, Fu Q, Xu S, Hao X, Qiu Y, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote healing via TNF-α-stimulated gene-6 in inflammatory bowel disease models. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(10):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Song W-J, Li Q, Ryu M-O, Ahn J-O, Bhang DH, Jung YC, et al. TSG-6 released from intraperitoneally injected canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate inflammatory bowel disease by inducing M2 macrophage switch in mice. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Li R, Liu W, Yin J, Chen Y, Guo S, Fan H, et al. TSG-6 attenuates inflammation-induced brain injury via modulation of microglial polarization in SAH rats through the SOCS3/STAT3 pathway. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hu Y, Li G, Zhang Y, Liu N, Zhang P, Pan C, et al. Upregulated TSG-6 expression in ADSCs inhibits the BV2 microglia-mediated inflammatory response. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Coulson-Thomas VJ, Lauer ME, Soleman S, Zhao C, Hascall VC, Day AJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6) is constitutively expressed in adult central nervous system (CNS) and associated with astrocyte-mediated glial scar formation following spinal cord injury. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(38):19939–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Jiang L, Zhang Y, Liu T, Wang X, Wang H, Song H, et al. Exosomes derived from TSG-6 modified mesenchymal stromal cells attenuate scar formation during wound healing. Biochimie. 2020;177:40–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhao H, Shang Q, Pan Z, Bai Y, Li Z, Zhang H, et al. Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells attenuate adipose inflammation and obesity through polarizing M2 macrophages and beiging in white adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2018;67(2):235–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ma T, Fu B, Yang X, Xiao Y, Pan M. Adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote cell proliferation, migration, and inhibit cell apoptosis via Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cutaneous wound healing. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(6):10847–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Yu H, Yang X, Xiao X, Xu M, Yang Y, Xue C, et al. Human adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect mice from DSS-Induced inflammatory bowel disease by promoting intestinal-stem-cell and epithelial regeneration. Aging Dis. 2021;12(6):1423.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Heidari N, Abbasi-Kenarsari H, Namaki S, Baghaei K, Zali MR, Ghaffari Khaligh S, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-secreted exosome alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute colitis by Treg cell induction and inflammatory cytokine reduction. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(8):5906–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yang R, Huang H, Cui S, Zhou Y, Zhang T, Zhou Y. IFN-γ promoted exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells to attenuate colitis via miR-125a and miR-125b. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(7):1–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Tian J, Zhu Q, Zhang Y, Bian Q, Hong Y, Shen Z, et al. Olfactory ecto-mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorate experimental colitis via modulating Th1/Th17 and treg cell responses. Front Immunol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.598322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Li T, Wan Y, Su Z, Li J, Han M, Zhou C. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal microRNA-3940-5p inhibits colorectal cancer metastasis by targeting integrin α6. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(6):1916–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Brooks DLP, Schwab LP, Krutilina R, Parke DN, Sethuraman A, Hoogewijs D, et al. ITGA6 is directly regulated by hypoxia-inducible factors and enriches for cancer stem cell activity and invasion in metastatic breast cancer models. Mol Cancer. 2016;15(1):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Guo L, Fu J, Sun S, Zhu M, Zhang L, Niu H, et al. MicroRNA-143-3p inhibits colorectal cancer metastases by targeting ITGA6 and ASAP3. Cancer Sci. 2019;110(2):805–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Linhares MM, Affonso RJ Jr, Viana LS, Silva SRM, Denadai MVA, de Toledo SRC, et al. Genetic and immunohistochemical expression of integrins ITGAV, ITGA6, and ITGA3 as prognostic factor for colorectal cancer: models for global and disease-free survival. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144333.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Bigoni-Ordóñez GD, Czarnowski D, Parsons T, Madlambayan GJ, Villa-Diaz LG. Integrin α6 (CD49f), the microenvironment and cancer stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;14(5):428–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Chen Z, He X, He X, Chen X, Lin X, Zou Y, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;450(4):1402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zheng X-B, He X-W, Zhang L-J, Qin H-B, Lin X-T, Liu X-H, et al. Bone marrow-derived CXCR4-overexpressing MSCs display increased homing to intestine and ameliorate colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice. Gastroenterol Rep. 2019;7(2):127–38.

    Google Scholar 

  79. François S, Usunier B, Forgue-Lafitte M-E, L’Homme B, Benderitter M, Douay L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell administration attenuates colon cancer progression by modulating the immune component within the colorectal tumor microenvironment. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8(3):285–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Chen J, Bai T, Wu F-X, Zhu S-L, Liu J-J, Li H, et al. miR-22-3p suppresses cell proliferation by regulating SP1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9(5):5437–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Chang Y, Yan W, Jiang X, Sun C, Liu Q, Wang J, et al. MiR-22-3p suppresses cell proliferation by targeting AEG-1 in NSCLC. J Pract Med. 2017;33(14):2267–71.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wang Y, Lin C. Exosomes miR-22–3p derived from mesenchymal stem cells suppress colorectal cancer cell proliferation and invasion by regulating RAP2B and PI3K/AKT pathway. J Oncol. 2021;2021:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Xu Y, Shen L, Li F, Yang J, Wan X, Ouyang M. microRNA-16-5p-containing exosomes derived from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit proliferation, migration, and invasion, while promoting apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells by downregulating ITGA2. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(11):21380–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Chuang Y-C, Wu H-Y, Lin Y-L, Tzou S-C, Chuang C-H, Jian T-Y, et al. Blockade of ITGA2 induces apoptosis and inhibits cell migration in gastric cancer. Biol Proced Online. 2018;20(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Li S, Zhang H, Wang X, Qu Y, Duan J, Liu R, et al. Direct targeting of HGF by miR-16 regulates proliferation and migration in gastric cancer. Tumor Biol. 2016;37(11):15175–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Nones K, Waddell N, Song S, Patch AM, Miller D, Johns A, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveal epigenetic deregulation of SLIT-ROBO, ITGA2 and MET signaling. Int J Cancer. 2014;135(5):1110–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhang H, Yang K, Ren T, Huang Y, Tang X, Guo W. miR-16-5p inhibits chordoma cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis by targeting Smad3. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(6):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Fregni G, Quinodoz M, Möller E, Vuille J, Galland S, Fusco C, et al. Reciprocal modulation of mesenchymal stem cells and tumor cells promotes lung cancer metastasis. EBioMedicine. 2018;29:128–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ridge SM, Sullivan FJ, Glynn SA. Mesenchymal stem cells: key players in cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Du WJ, Chi Y, Yang ZX, Li ZJ, Cui JJ, Song BQ, et al. Heterogeneity of proangiogenic features in mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, umbilical cord, and placenta. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Feng B, Chen L. Review of mesenchymal stem cells and tumors: executioner or coconspirator? Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2009;24(6):717–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Timaner M, Tsai KK, Shaked Y, editors. The multifaceted role of mesenchymal stem cells in cancer. Seminars in cancer biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mc Namee N, O’Driscoll L. Extracellular vesicles and anti-cancer drug resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2018;1870(2):123–36.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Katz OB, Shaked Y. Host effects contributing to cancer therapy resistance. Drug Resist Updates. 2015;19:33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Sharma A. Role of stem cell derived exosomes in tumor biology. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(6):1086–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Wu X-B, Liu Y, Wang G-H, Xu X, Cai Y, Wang H-Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote colorectal cancer progression through AMPK/mTOR-mediated NF-κB activation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Zhang N, Li L, Luo J, Tan J, Hu W, Li Z, et al. Inhibiting microRNA-424 in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes suppresses tumor growth in colorectal cancer by upregulating TGFBR3. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021;709:108965.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Zhang M, Gao C, Yang Y, Li G, Dong J, Ai Y, et al. MiR-424 promotes non-small cell lung cancer progression and metastasis through regulating the tumor suppressor gene TNFAIP1. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(1):211–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Boldrup L, Coates P, Laurell G, Wilms T, Fahraeus R, Nylander K. Downregulation of miRNA-424: a sign of field cancerisation in clinically normal tongue adjacent to squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(11):1760–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Jepsen RK, Novotny GW, Klarskov LL, Christensen IJ, Riis LB, Høgdall E. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of microRNA-92a, microRNA-375 and microRNA-424 in colorectal cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2016;100(1):125–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Li H, Li F. Exosomes from BM-MSCs increase the population of CSCs via transfer of miR-142-3p. Br J Cancer. 2018;119(6):744–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Du Q, Ye X, Lu SR, Li H, Liu HY, Zhai Q, et al. Exosomal miR-30a and miR-222 derived from colon cancer mesenchymal stem cells promote the tumorigenicity of colon cancer through targeting MIA3. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12(1):52–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Gao H, Cong X, Zhou J, Guan M. MicroRNA-222 influences migration and invasion through MIA3 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Han S, Li G, Jia M, Zhao Y, He C, Huang M, et al. Delivery of anti-miRNA-221 for colorectal carcinoma therapy using modified cord blood mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes. Front Mol Biosci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.743013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Li Y-J, Wu J-Y, Wang J-M, Hu X-B, Cai J-X, Xiang D-X. Gemcitabine loaded autologous exosomes for effective and safe chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:519–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Yang T, Martin P, Fogarty B, Brown A, Schurman K, Phipps R, et al. Exosome delivered anticancer drugs across the blood-brain barrier for brain cancer therapy in Danio rerio. Pharm Res. 2015;32(6):2003–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Liang G, Zhu Y, Ali DJ, Tian T, Xu H, Si K, et al. Engineered exosomes for targeted co-delivery of miR-21 inhibitor and chemotherapeutics to reverse drug resistance in colon cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18(1):1–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Tian Y, Li S, Song J, Ji T, Zhu M, Anderson GJ, et al. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35(7):2383–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Nie X, Zhang J, Xu Q, Liu X, Li Y, Wu Y, et al. Targeting peptide iRGD-conjugated amphiphilic chitosan-co-PLA/DPPE drug delivery system for enhanced tumor therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(21):3232–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Wang Y, Chen X, Tian B, Liu J, Yang L, Zeng L, et al. Nucleolin-targeted extracellular vesicles as a versatile platform for biologics delivery to breast cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7(5):1360.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Greco KA, Franzen CA, Foreman KE, Flanigan RC, Kuo PC, Gupta GN. PLK-1 silencing in bladder cancer by siRNA delivered with exosomes. Urology. 2016;91:241.e1-241.e7.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Liao W, Du Y, Zhang C, Pan F, Yao Y, Zhang T, et al. Exosomes: The next generation of endogenous nanomaterials for advanced drug delivery and therapy. Acta Biomater. 2019;86:1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Johnsen KB, Gudbergsson JM, Skov MN, Pilgaard L, Moos T, Duroux M. A comprehensive overview of exosomes as drug delivery vehicles: Endogenous nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2014;1846(1):75–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Zuo H. iRGD: a promising peptide for cancer imaging and a potential therapeutic agent for various cancers. J Oncol. 2019;2019:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Lou G, Song X, Yang F, Wu S, Wang J, Chen Z, et al. Exosomes derived from miR-122-modified adipose tissue-derived MSCs increase chemosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8(1):1–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhou S, Meng F, Du S, Qian H, Ding N, Sha H, et al. Bifunctional iRGD-anti-CD3 enhances antitumor potency of T cells by facilitating tumor infiltration and T-cell activation. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(5):e00925.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Bagheri E, Abnous K, Farzad SA, Taghdisi SM, Ramezani M, Alibolandi M. Targeted doxorubicin-loaded mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes as a versatile platform for fighting against colorectal cancer. Life Sci. 2020;261:118369.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Dai S, Wei D, Wu Z, Zhou X, Wei X, Huang H, et al. Phase I clinical trial of autologous ascites-derived exosomes combined with GM-CSF for colorectal cancer. Mol Ther. 2008;16(4):782–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Zheng X-B, He X-W, Zhang L-J, Qin H-B, Lin X-T, Liu X-H, et al. Bone marrow-derived CXCR4-overexpressing MSCs display increased homing to intestine and ameliorate colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice. Gastroenterology report. 2019;7(2):127–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82100554) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M663748). This work was also supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82173394).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Gut Microbiome Research, Med-X Institute Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Gang Guo & Junjun She

  2. Department of Talent Highland, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Gang Guo & Junjun She

  3. Department of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, China

    Zhaobang Tan

  4. Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Yaping Liu

  5. Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Feiyu Shi & Junjun She

Authors
  1. Gang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhaobang Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yaping Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feiyu Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junjun She
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JS and ZT contributed to the conception and design of the work. GG performed the database search and preparing the manuscript. YL and FS contributed to the preparation of figures and tables. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhaobang Tan or Junjun She.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiao Tong University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, G., Tan, Z., Liu, Y. et al. The therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived exosomes in the ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. Stem Cell Res Ther 13, 138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02811-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02811-5

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512