Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efferocytosis of viable versus heat-inactivated MSC induces human monocytes to distinct immunosuppressive phenotypes

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 206 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can occur through trophic factor mechanisms, however, intravenously infused MSCs are rapidly cleared from the body yet a potent immunotherapeutic response is still observed. Recent work suggests that monocytes contribute to the clearance of MSCs via efferocytosis, the body’s natural mechanism for clearing dead and dying cells in a non-inflammatory manner. This begs the questions of how variations in MSC quality affect monocyte phenotype and if viable MSCs are even needed to elicit an immunosuppressive response.

Methods

Herein, we sought to dissect MSC’s trophic mechanism from their efferocytic mechanisms and determine if the viability of MSCs prior to efferocytosis influences the resultant phenotype of monocytes. We cultured viable or heat-inactivated human umbilical cord MSCs with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for 24 h and observed changes in monocyte surface marker expression and secretion profile. To isolate the effect of efferocytosis from MSC trophic factors, we used cell separation techniques to remove non-efferocytosed MSCs before challenging monocytes to suppress T-cells or respond to inflammatory stimuli. For all experiments, viable and heat-inactivated efferocytic-licensing of monocytes were compared to non-efferocytic-licensing control.

Results

We found that monocytes efferocytose viable and heat-inactivated MSCs equally, but only viable MSC-licensed monocytes suppress activated T-cells and suppression occurred even after depletion of residual MSCs. This provides direct evidence that monocytes that efferocytose viable MSCs are immunosuppressive. Further characterization of monocytes after efferocytosis showed that uptake of viable-but not heat inactivated-MSC resulted in monocytes secreting IL-10 and producing kynurenine. When monocytes were challenged with LPS, IL-2, and IFN-γ to simulate sepsis, monocytes that had efferocytosed viable MSC had higher levels of IDO while monocytes that efferocytosed heat inactivated-MSCs produced the lowest levels of TNF-α.

Conclusion

Collectively, these studies show that the quality of MSCs efferocytosed by monocytes polarize monocytes toward distinctive immunosuppressive phenotypes and highlights the need to tailor MSC therapies for specific indications.

Background

Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells’ (MSCs) immunomodulatory capability and their relative ease of expansion from a variety of tissue sources has made them an attractive option for cell therapy. In fact, MSCs are one of the most widely studied cell therapeutics to date with more than 900 recruiting, active, or completed trials over the past 20 years [1]. They have been studied as a treatment for a variety of disorders, including many inflammatory conditions such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), Crohn’s, multiple sclerosis, and, most recently, acute lung injury associated with COVID-19 [2,3,4,5,6].

Despite their widespread use, the mechanisms by which MSCs elicit their immunomodulatory capabilities are diverse and which mechanisms are critical for specific therapeutic applications remain to be identified [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. To date, MSCs have been shown in vitro to suppress inflammation via IDO [14, 15], PGE-2 [16,17,18,19], TSG-6 [20,21,22], and other trophic factors. While inhibition studies have shown these trophic factors play an important role in MSC immune modulation in specific disease settings [23,24,25,26], many questions remain. Most critically, how is it that MSCs exert a lasting effect on the immune system when they exist in the body for such a short period of time? MSCs persist only transiently after intravenous infusion, quickly becoming trapped in the microvasculature of the lungs [27, 28], and are then cleared; yet, despite this limited persistence, there is widespread evidence that MSCs lead to durable immune suppression in models of EAE [29, 30], asthma [31], GvHD [18, 32], sepsis [33, 34], and others [35,36,37,38]. Recently it has been shown that cleared MSCs are associated with circulating monocytes and tissue-resident macrophages [32, 39, 40]. From this observation a new mechanism of action has been hypothesized: efferocytosis. Efferocytosis is the body’s natural mechanism for clearing dead and dying cells without eliciting an inflammatory response [41,42,43,44]. The efferocytosis hypothesis states that MSCs immunomodulatory effects in vivo are largely mediated by monocytes that phagocytose apoptotic MSC debris, after which the monocytes take on an immune resolving phenotype, a process we term efferocytic-licensing. Since this hypothesis has arisen there has been evidence to support the feasibility of it, but many questions remain [8, 45,46,47,48].

De Witte et al. [39] demonstrated that after phagocytosis of MSCs, monocytes polarize toward a mixed anti- and pro-inflammatory phenotype with an emphasis toward anti-inflammatory as indicated by gene and surface marker expression. They also observed an increase in Treg production after monocytes phagocytose MSCs. Other studies have shown T-cell suppression in mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) when viable, but not non-viable, MSCs are used in a traditional co-culture setup [33, 49]. In these traditional MLR co-cultures, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from one donor are cultured with γ-irradiated HLA-mismatched PBMCs of a separate donor and allowed to proliferate for 5–7 days. However, in these studies, efferocytosis-associated immunosuppression was not isolated but instead occurred in tandem with trophic signaling from live MSCs during the T-cell interactions. Because of potential non-efferocytic effects associated with MLR and in vivo studies, determining whether efferocytosis is a benign side-effect of MSC therapy versus a robust mechanism of action of MSC therapy has been difficult to establish.

In this study, we sought to dissect MSCs trophic signaling mechanism from their efferocytic mechanisms to determine if efferocytic-licensing of human monocytes by MSCs leads to an immunosuppressive phenotype and to further determine if the viability of MSCs prior to efferocytosis influences efferocytic-licensing of monocytes. To accomplish this, we efferocytically-licensed human monocytes with either viable- or HI-MSCs and then analyzed the monocytes through a series of phenotypic and functional assays. To ensure we isolate the effect of efferocytosis from the effects of MSC trophic factors, we used a variety of passive and active cell separation techniques to remove non-efferocytosed MSCs before challenging monocytes to suppress T-cells or respond to inflammatory stimuli. The results of this work have implications for assessing the potency of MSCs, the manufacturing of MSC-based therapies, and highlight the importance of host interactions in the success of MSC-based therapies.

Methods

Isolation of human PBMCs

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from a leukapheresis reduction system cone (LRC) of a blood donor from the DeGowin Blood Center at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics by Ficoll-gradient centrifugation. Briefly, human blood from an LRC was flushed with base RPMI and centrifuged at 600g without break for 30 min, the buffy coat was collected, and red blood cells were lysed with 1X RBC lysis buffer (1 part 10X RBC Lysis Buffer (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, Cat# TNB-4300-L100) + 9 parts sterile DI H2O). Isolated PBMCs were further processed for monocyte isolation or cryopreserved in a freezing medium of 50% RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, Cat# 11875-085), 40% FBS (VWR, Radnor, PA, Cat# 97068-085), and 10% DMSO (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, Cat# D128) at 30 million cells per mL. Prior to use in culture, cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed at 37 °C and allowed to reacclimate for 1 h in RPMI containing 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (complete RPMI).

Isolation of human monocytes

Human peripheral monocytes were isolated from PBMCs using a monocyte negative selection magnetic isolation nanobead kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 480060). Briefly, PBMCs were isolated as described and resuspended to 1 × 108 cells/mL in sorting buffer (1X PBS at pH 7.2, 0.5% (w/v) BSA, 2 mM EDTA). Fc receptors were blocked using 5 µL Human TruStain FcX blocking solution (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 422302, provided in monocyte isolation kit) per 100 µL isolation volume for 10 min at room temperature. A 10 µL aliquot of biotin-conjugated antibody cocktail from the isolation kit was then added per 100 µL of cell suspension to label non-monocytes and the cells were allowed to incubate on ice for 15 min. Next, 10 µL of streptavidin-conjugated magnetic nanobeads provided in the isolation kit were vortexed and added per 100 µL of cell suspension. The cells were allowed to incubate on ice for 15 min, then diluted with sorting buffer and centrifuged at 300g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and the cells were resuspended with 2.5 mL of sorting buffer, then placed in a MojoSort magnet (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 480019) for 5 min. After 5 min, the liquid was carefully collected into a clean centrifuge tube and an additional wash with magnetic separation of the beads was performed. Samples of resuspended cells were compared before and after separation by flow cytometry to confirm purity and yield. Isolated monocytes were cryopreserved at 10 million cells per mL using the same freezing media for PBMC cryopreservation. Prior to use in culture, cryopreserved monocytes were thawed at 37 °C and allowed to reacclimate for 1 h in complete RPMI.

MSC culture

Primary human umbilical cord MSCs (MSCs) were previously isolated from human umbilical cord donors [50]. MSCs were allowed to expand to 80% confluence in MEM-α supplemented with 15% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (complete MEM-α) then harvested on the day of MSC:PBMC co-culture. Passage 5–7 MSCs resuspended in complete RPMI were used for all experiments.

Heat-inactivation of MSCs

Heat-inactivation (HI) of MSCs was performed by incubating MSCs at 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI in a 50 °C water bath for 30 min. Following incubation, the cells were centrifuged at 500g for 5 min, then resuspended to 1 million cells per mL with complete RPMI.

MSC efferocytic-licensing

PBMCs were thawed as described above and resuspended at 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI. They were plated at 200,000 cells per well in a 96-well polypropylene V-bottom microplate (Corning, Corning, NY, Cat# 3357). For experiments requiring various MSC:PBMC ratios, MSCs were resuspended at 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI, then serially diluted 1:1 with fresh complete RPMI to obtain stock dilutions of MSCs for plating MSC:PBMC coculture conditions of 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:40, and 1:80 in the 96-well polypropylene V-bottom microplate. Conditions consisted of PBMC alone, PBMC + viable MSC, and PBMC + HI-MSC. For samples that do not contain MSCs, an appropriate volume of media was added to maintain culture volume consistency. The co-cultures were allowed to incubate for 24 h before further use or analysis.

For experiments requiring a fixed 1:5 ratio of MSC:PBMC, viable or HI-MSCs were resuspended at 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI and added to PBMCs (40,000 MSCs: 200,000 PBMCs) in 96-well polypropylene V-bottom microplates. Samples were allowed to incubate as described above.

For experiments requiring a fixed number of MSC:monocytes, viable or HI-MSCs were resuspended at 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI and added to isolated monocytes at a 1:1 ratio (40,000 MSC: 40,000 monocytes) in 96-well polypropylene V-bottom microplates. Each condition to be tested was plated to separate plates and samples were allowed to incubate as described above.

Phagocytosis assay

MSCs were stained with CellBrite Orange Cytoplasmic Membrane Dye (CBO) (Biotium, Fremont, CA, Cat# 30022) prior to culture with PBMCs. Briefly, MSCs were resuspended at 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI and stained with 5 µL of CBO per 1 million MSCs. The MSCs were allowed to incubate at 4 °C for 20 min, and then washed twice with complete RPMI. Following staining, some MSCs underwent heat-inactivation as described above. Stained MSCs were added to PBMCs as described in “MSC Efferocytic-Licensing” above for conditions requiring various ratios of MSC:PBMC.

Following efferocytic-licensing the samples were centrifuged at 500g for 5 min, then resuspended with 50 µL pre-made Fc receptor blocking solution per sample (9 parts Cell Staining Buffer (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 420201)+1 part Human TruStain FcX (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 422302)) (Table 1). Samples were allowed to incubate at room temperature for 10 min. 50 µL of stain index optimized anti-human CD14-AlexaFluor 488 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 325610) (Table 1) antibody was then added to the samples and they were allowed to stain for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Samples were washed twice and then analyzed by flow cytometry to detect CD14 + monocytes that had phagocytosed CBO-stained MSCs.

Table 1 Product and staining information for on-target, isotype, and blocking antibodies used for experiments
Full size table

T-cell proliferation assay

To track T-cell proliferation, PBMCs were thawed as described before and then stained prior to MSC efferocytic-licensing with CFSE Cell Division Tracker Kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 423801) using the manufacturer’s protocol with optimized staining concentration for use with a Cytek Northern Lights flow cytometer. Briefly, PBMCs were resuspended at 1 million cells/mL in PBS and stained with 1 µL of 0.25 mM CFSE per 2 million PBMCs for a final concentration of 0.125 mM. The PBMCs were allowed to incubate at 37 °C for 15 min, centrifuged at 500g for 8 min, resuspended at 1 million cells per mL with complete RPMI, and allowed to incubate at 37 °C for 30 min. PBMCs were centrifuged once more and resuspended to 1 million cells/mL with complete RPMI. MSCs and PBMCs were plated for efferocytic-licensing as described before for experiments requiring various ratios of MSC:PBMC or for experiments requiring a fixed 1:5 ratio of MSC:PBMC.

Following efferocytic-licensing, each culture condition tested (PBMC only, PBMC + MSC, and PBMC + HI MSC) was separately pooled, counted, and resuspended in complete RPMI to 1 million PBMCs/mL. The cells were either further processed to remove non-phagocytosed MSCs or plated to a 96-well flat-bottom polystyrene microplate. For samples that were plated without further processing, 200,000 PBMCs were added per well in triplicate for each condition.

T-cell activation was performed by adding Human T-cell CD3/CD28 Activator Dynabeads (Gibco, Waltham, MA, Cat# 11132D) to PBMCs using the manufacturer protocol with modifications. Briefly, a solution of diluted Dynabeads was prepared by first washing the beads in PBS followed by resuspension in complete RPMI to a concentration of 6X the final concentration. Each sample needing activation received 40 µL of resuspended Dynabeads to achieve a culture volume of 240 µL and a final concentration of half the manufacturer recommended concentration of Dynabeads per activated sample. Non-activated samples received 40 µL of complete RPMI and served as negative controls.

Samples were allowed to incubate for 4 days after which they were collected, and samples were resuspended to disrupt Dynabeads. The samples were placed on a magnet tube rack for 5 min to pull out the Dynabeads and the cells were transferred to new tubes for centrifugation at 500g for 5 min. The cells were resuspended with 50 µL pre-made Fc receptor blocking solution per sample as described in Phagocytosis Assay above. Samples were allowed to incubate at room temperature for 10 min. Following incubation, each sample received 25 µL of pre-made cyanine-dye blocking solution (4 parts Cell Staining Buffer + 1 part True-Stain Monocyte Blocker [BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 426103) (Table 1)]. The samples were each stained with 25 µL of pre-made stain index optimized anti-human CD3-PE/Cy7 antibody (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 317334) (Table 1) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Samples were washed twice and resuspended in Cell Staining Buffer prior to analysis by flow cytometry. T cells were gated based on positive CFSE and CD3 signal.

Depletion of non-phagocytosed MSCs

To remove non-phagocytosed MSCs after efferocytic-licensing, but prior to T-cell activation, MSCs were labeled with anti-human CD90-PE antibody (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 328110) (Table 1) then depleted using BioLegend’s MojoSort Human anti-PE Nanobead selection kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 480092). For consistency, every culture condition (PBMC only, PBMC + MSC, PBMC + HI-MSC) underwent this MSC selection process. In brief, cells were centrifuged at 500g for 5 min and resuspended at 10 million cells/100 µL in nanobead selection buffer (1X PBS, pH 7.2; 0.5% (w/v) BSA; 2 mM EDTA). Human TruStain FcX from the selection kit was used to block Fc receptors by adding 5 µL of human TruStain FcX per 100 µL cell suspension at room temperature for 10 min. Anti-human CD90-PE was added to the cell suspension and the cells were stained on ice for 15 min. Cells were washed with nanobead selection buffer and centrifuged at 300g for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in 100 µL buffer, a sample was obtained to assess baseline MSC:PBMC ratio by flow cytometry, then 10 µL/10 million cells of human anti-PE nanobeads from the selection kit was added to the remaining cell suspension, and the cells were incubated on ice for 15 min. The cells were washed with buffer and centrifuged at 300g for 5 min. The cell suspension was resuspended with 2.5 mL of buffer and placed in a MojoSort magnet (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 480019) for 5 min. Unlabeled cells were collected and a sample was obtained to assess effectiveness of MSC removal by comparing to the baseline MSC:PBMC ratio (Fig. 3b, Additional file 1: Figure S3B). The cells were counted, resuspended to 1 million cells/mL in complete RPMI, 200,000 cells were plated per well of a 96-well polystyrene flat-bottom microplate, then T-cells were activated as mentioned above.

Monocyte phenotyping

To determine monocyte phenotype, triplicate samples of each culture condition tested were plated as described above for experiments using a fixed 1:5 MSC:PBMC ratio. Each triplicate sample of a given condition consisted of 5 replicate wells that were pooled together after efferocytic-licensing. Samples were centrifuged, and Fc receptors and non-specific cyanine dye were blocked using the same protocol used prior to antibody staining in the T-Cell Proliferation Assay method above. Using stain index optimized antibody concentrations, the samples then received 25 µL of pre-mixed phenotype staining solution (CD14-AlexaFluor 488 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 325610), CD16-PE/Fire 640 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 302068), CD86-PerCP/Cy5.5 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 305419), CD163-PE/Cy7 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat#333614), and CD206-PE/Dazzle594 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 321130)) (Table 1) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. Samples were washed twice and resuspended in Cell Staining Buffer prior to analysis by flow cytometry. Cells were gated based on singlet discrimination and CD14 for all monocytes, CD16 was used with CD14 to gate for monocyte subsets (CM, IM, and NCM), and then each subset was gated on CD86, CD163, and CD206 monocyte polarization markers (Additional file 1: Figure S4).

Monocyte activation (in vitro sepsis model)

Monocytes were activated by supplementing complete culture media with recombinant IL-2, IFN-γ, LPS, and L-tryptophan. Briefly, following efferocytic-licensing, all wells from the microplates prepared for MSC:monocyte cocultures were pooled according to condition and resuspended to 1 million cells per mL. Each condition of cells was resuspended to 1 million cells/mL in either monocyte activation media or control media. The activation media was prepared by supplementing complete RPMI with recombinant human IL-2 (PeproTech, Cranbury, NJ, Cat# 200-02), recombinant human IFN-γ (PeproTech, Cranbury, NJ, Cat# 300-02), LPS O55:B5 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, Cat# L6529), and L-tryptophan (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, Cat# T0254) to final concentrations of 5 ng/mL, 10 ng/mL, 10 ng/mL, and 200 µM, respectively. Control media was prepared by supplementing complete RPMI with L-tryptophan to a final concentration of 200 µM. Samples were plated in a 96-well flat-bottom polystyrene microplate with 200,000 monocytes only, 200,000 viable or HI-MSC efferocytically-licensed monocytes, or 40,000 MSCs (viable or HI) per well. Each condition was plated in triplicate and allowed to incubate at 37 °C for 2 days. Media was collected from each sample after 2 days for further analysis.

ELISA

TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-10 soluble protein levels were analyzed using ELISA kits (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, TNF-α: Cat# 430204, IFN-γ: Cat# 430104, IL-10: Cat# 430604). Briefly, 100 µL of diluted capture antibody was added to a 96-well uncoated ELISA plate (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 423501) for incubation at 4 °C overnight. The next day, the capture antibody was removed, and the plate was washed 4 times with 300 µL/well of 1X wash buffer (19 parts DI H2O + 1 part 20X ELISA Wash Buffer (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, Cat# 421601)). All subsequent wash steps were performed the same. Non-specific binding was blocked by incubating the plate with 200 µL of Assay Diluent from the ELISA kit per well for 1 h with orbital shaking at room temperature. After blocking, the plate was washed again, then 100 µL of standards and samples were added per well. Samples were diluted in Assay Diluent if necessary. The plate was placed back on the orbital shaker for a 2 h incubation at room temperature. Next, the wells were washed again and 100 µL of diluted Detection Antibody from the kit was added to each well, then the plate was returned to the shaker for a 1 h incubation at room temperature. The plate was washed again, followed by addition of 100 µL of diluted Avidin-HRP solution per well. The samples were placed back on the shaker for a 30-min incubation at room temperature. The plate was washed once more, this time 5 times with each wash iteration allowed to soak for 1 min. 100 µL of TMB substrate was then added to each well and the plate was allowed to incubate for 15–45 min in the dark. To stop the reaction 100 µL of 1N H2SO4 was added to each well. Absorbance was read at 450 nm on a plate reader. Non-specific background subtraction was performed by additionally reading the plate at 570 nm.

Kynurenine assay

IDO activity was assessed using a kynurenine colorimetric assay. Briefly, L-kynurenine stock was prepared by dissolving L-kynurenine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, Cat# K8625) in complete culture media at 5000 µM. A 500 µM top standard was prepared by diluting one part stock in nine parts complete culture media, then six 1:1 serial dilutions were performed. 30%(w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, Cat# T9159) was used to precipitate proteins from the standards and sample media at a 1:1 dilution of TCA to media in a 96-well V-bottom microplate. The plate was then heated at 52 °C for 30 min to convert N-formylkynurenine to kynurenine followed by centrifugation at 1200g for 15 min to remove precipitated proteins. The supernatant from each sample was split equally into replicate wells of a new 96-well flat-bottom microplate and each well received 0.8%(w/v) Ehrlich’s reagent (4-(Dimethylamino)benzaldehyde in acetic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, Cat# 156477) at a volume equal to the media volume. Samples were allowed to incubate at room temperature for 10 min and then read on a plate reader at 492 nm. Sample concentrations were interpolated from the L-kynurenine standard curve.

Flow cytometry controls and antibody information

Instrument and gating controls were prepared using stained MSCs and/or PBMCs under the conditions tested in experiments. In brief, unstained and single-color controls were used to establish instrument voltage settings, isotype controls were used to determine non-specific staining of on-target antibodies, and experiments with more than two fluorophores or dyes used fluorescence-minus-one controls with stain-index optimized on-target antibodies and dyes for establishing gates. If experiments used one or two fluorophores or dyes, then antibody isotype controls or no stain controls were used to establish gates for antibody staining or dye-based staining, respectively. Antigen-fluorophore pairs were deliberately chosen to allow for maximal spectral emission separation within experimental parameters and fluorophores were paired with antigens according to fluorophore brightness and expected antigen abundance.

SpectroFlo Cytometer QC Beads (Cytek, Fremont, CA, Cat# N7-97355-0A) were used for quality control calibration prior to analysis by flow cytometry.

Analysis

Flow cytometry was performed using a Cytek Northern Lights spectral cytometer equipped with a 488 nm laser and 14 fluorescent emission filters, and data were collected using SpectroFlo v3.0.0 software. Flow cytometry data processing was done using FlowJo v10. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad Prism 9. All data are presented as mean ± SEM for 3 independent experiments. P-values were calculated after 1-way or 2-way ANOVA with Tukey or Dunnett post hoc tests depending on the experiment performed. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Experiment specific statistical analysis information can be found in the figure captions.

Results

Human monocytes phagocytose viable and heat-inactivated human MSCs in a dose-dependent manner

The hypothesis that efferocytosis of MSCs is responsible for MSCs immunosuppressive effects raises the question of whether the vitality of an MSC product is critical for therapeutic efficacy. Thus, we first wanted to determine if the phagocytic response of human peripheral monocytes differed upon encountering viable versus heat-inactivated MSCs (HI-MSCs). We cultured PBMCs with viable- or HI-MSCs for 24 h, after which phagocytosis was determined by the percent of CD14+ cells that were positive for CellBrite Orange (CBO), a membrane stain used to label MSCs prior to co-culture (Fig. 1a). We found viable and HI-MSCs were phagocytosed to equivalent amounts in a dose-dependent manner with the highest MSC:PBMC ratio exhibiting the most phagocytosis (Fig. 1b). Phagocytosis of MSCs by CD14 + human monocytes was confirmed by Z-stack imaging using an inverted fluorescent microscope which revealed intracellular depots of CBO cargo within CD14 + monocytes (Fig. 1c). This indicates that human MSCs are efficiently phagocytosed by human monocytes regardless of whether the cells have high or low viability or metabolic activity (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Human monocytes phagocytose viable and heat-inactivated human MSCs in a dose-dependent manner. a Gating strategy and representative plots of CD14 + monocytes alone (−MSC) or cultured with CBO-stained MSCs (+MSC) or HI-MSCs (+HI-MSC) for 24 h. b The percent of CD14 + monocytes positive for CBO increases with increasing dose of MSCs and HI-MSCs after 24 h of non-adherent co-culture (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments). c Representative Z-stack cross sections at 1 µm intervals of a CD14-AlexaFluor 488 stained monocyte (green) after 24 h coculture with CBO-stained MSCs (red). Nuclei stained blue with Hoechst33342

Full size image

Human T-cell proliferation is suppressed following phagocytosis of MSCs in a dose-dependent manner

Having established that the health status of MSCs did not affect monocyte’s ability to phagocytose them, we next wanted to determine how phagocytosing MSCs impacted monocyte function. Specifically, we wanted to determine if phagocytosing MSCs resulted in the monocytes taking on an inflammatory or immunosuppressive phenotype. To test this, we again allowed monocytes to phagocytose either viable or HI-MSCs for 24 h and then transferred the PBMCs to a new plate to remove residual MSCs before T-cell activation (Fig. 2a, b). While T-cell proliferation was not changed after phagocytosis of HI-MSC, we found T-cell proliferation was suppressed in conditions with increasing amounts of viable MSCs that were present during the efferocytic-licensing (Fig. 2c, d). This data show that efferocytosis of viable, but not HI-MSCs, induces monocytes to take on an immunosuppressive phenotype toward activated T-cells that results in significant blunting of activated T-cell proliferation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Human T-cell proliferation is suppressed following 24 h exposure to MSCs in a dose-dependent manner. a Schematic of 24 h efferocytic-licensing of monocytes in suspension followed by replating and 4d T-cell activation. b Gating strategy for T-cell proliferation analysis. After singlet discrimination, CFSE positive PBMCs were gated, and the T-cell population was gated using FSC-SSC. % proliferation was then calculated using a gate based on the No Stim Control. c Representative T-cell proliferation histograms for MSC and HI-MSC culture conditions at each MSC:PBMC ratio tested. The dotted line denotes the proliferative (+) from the non-proliferative (−) cells. d Quantification of T-cell proliferation as a percent of the positive stim control for each MSC:PBMC ratio. (Mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 2-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc test to compare + MSC and + HI-MSC at each ratio to normalized stimulated control (dashed line)). e Quantification of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines detected after T-cell activation without or with efferocytic-licensing by viable or HI-MSC (box and whisker show 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile while whiskers show min and max values, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test to compare all conditions)

Full size image

To further gauge how efferocytosis of MSCs causes monocytes to alter the local inflammatory environment in the setting of T-cell activation we assayed three key soluble immune factors, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-10. Exposure of PBMCs to viable and HI-MSCs for 24 h to allow for efferocytosis followed by T-cell activation resulted in significant reduction in TNF-α and IFN-γ production compared to monocytes without efferocytic-licensing (Fig. 2e). For both TNF-α and IFN-γ, the reduction was largest when monocytes efferocytosed viable-rather than HI-MSC. Interestingly, while efferocytosis of viable MSC led to significant levels of T-cell suppression, we found no difference in the levels of IL-10 between HI-MSC and viable MSC, but both conditions resulted in a narrower range of IL-10 levels compared to the no-efferocytosis control (Fig. 2e). This data demonstrate that efferocytosis of viable- and HI-MSC by monocytes significantly alters the inflammatory milieu by reducing levels of inflammatory cytokines.

Human T-cell proliferation is suppressed by MSC-licensed monocytes even after removal of residual MSCs

Next, we wanted to definitively confirm that the suppression of T-cells we were observing was due to efferocytically-licensed monocytes, and not residual viable MSCs in the co-culture. While our initial experiments utilized a replating strategy to leave non-efferocytosed MSCs behind before T-cell activation, we noted small spheroids of non-phagocytosed viable MSCs were still transferred during the replating of cells from polypropylene V-bottom microplates to polystyrene flat-bottom microplates. By the end of the assay the residual MSCs had attached and spread out in the wells (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Previous work from our group has shown that spheroid MSCs are not immunosuppressive toward T-cells [17], but we wanted to confirm that the residual MSCs were not contributing to suppression. To determine if the suppression was due to monocytes that had efferocytosed MSCs or the non-efferocytosed residual MSCs, we depleted non-efferocytosed MSCs from our culture after the 24 h efferocytosis period, and then plated the T-cell activation assay (Fig. 3a). Using the magnetic bead-based depletion technique, we observed 70–80% reduction in MSCs (Additional file 1: Figure S3A, B) that reduced the effective MSC-to-PBMC ratio to ~ 1:50, well below what is needed for viable MSCs to impact T-cell proliferation (Fig. 3b). To verify that any remaining MSCs after depletion from the MSC:PBMC coculture were not suppressive on their own, different cell numbers of MSCs were plated followed by a fixed number of non-MSC educated PBMCs to achieve MSC-to-PBMC ratios of 1:5 to 1:80. Only co-cultures with MSC ratios of 1:10 or greater showed significant levels of T-cell suppression (Additional file 1: Figure S3B). Of note, even our passive MSC depletion technique relying on transfer of PBMCs from v-bottom polypropylene plates after the efferocytosis period reduces the amount of residual MSCs to a ratio of 1:14. Thus, this quality control assay confirms that the small amount of residual MSCs after depletion is not responsible for the T-cell suppression observed after efferocytosis of viable MSC. After the depletion of non-efferocytosed MSCs we observed that monocytes that have efferocytosed viable MSCs significantly suppress T-cell proliferation (Fig. 3c). This suggests efferocytosis of viable MSCs by monocytes is critical for monocytes to take on an immunosuppressive phenotype toward activated T-cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Human T-cell proliferation is suppressed by MSC-licensed monocytes even after residual MSCs are removed. a Schematic of process used to remove residual MSCs after 24 h MSC:PBMC coculture. Residual MSCs were labeled with a CD90 antibody conjugated to PE and then tagged with Anti-PE MojoSort nanobeads and pulled down with a magnet. b Representative plots showing efficiency of MSC removal. Left panels show gate for CD90 + MSCs and the right panels show an overlay of total cells (red) and CD90 + MSCs (light blue). c Quantification of T-cell proliferation as a percent of the positive stim control for 1:5 MSC:PBMC (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test)

Full size image

Human monocytes experience differential phenotypic shift upon efferocytosis of viable-versus HI-MSC

Next, having established that the efferocytically-licensed monocytes were suppressive toward T-cells, we wanted to determine how the monocytes were changing phenotypically. Specifically, we wanted to determine how monocyte subsets as well as their surface marker inflammatory profiles change using a panel of five surface markers: CD14 and CD16 for determining monocyte subsets, CD86 as a traditional inflammatory marker for M1-like monocytes, and CD163 and CD206 as traditional anti-inflammatory markers for M2-like monocytes (Additional file 1: Figure S4). After culture with either viable or HI-MSCs, monocytes do not significantly alter their CD14 versus CD16 profile and thus the fraction of monocytes belonging to classical (CD14hiCD16-), intermediate (CD14hiCD16lo/int), or non-classical subsets (CD14intCD16hi) is relatively unchanged by efferocytosis (Fig. 4a, b). However, there is a significant shift in CD14loCD16-cells into the various monocyte subsets when MSCs are a part of the culture system (Fig. 4a). Monocytes efferocytically-licensed with MSCs and HI-MSCs increase their CD86 expression and decrease their CD163 expression for each monocyte subset compared to control, but viable MSCs induce the greatest changes (Fig. 4c). CD86 expression is significantly increased in classical and intermediate monocytes for viable MSC educated monocytes compared to control (Fig. 4d). For non-classical monocytes CD86 expression is significantly increased for both viable and HI-MSC efferocytically-licensed monocytes compared to control (Fig. 4d). CD163 expression is significantly reduced in classical and intermediate monocytes for viable MSC educated monocytes compared to control (Fig. 4e). To our surprise, we were not able to detect significant levels of CD206 for any monocytes with or without efferocytosis of MSCs (Additional file 1: Figure S5). From this 5-color panel, we see that the surface marker profile of viable MSC efferocytically-licensed monocytes, which suppress T-cell proliferation, adopt a predominantly CD86hiCD163lo phenotype while non-suppressive HI-MSC efferocytically-licensed monocytes, adopt a predominantly CD86intCD163int phenotype.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Human monocytes experience differential phenotypic shift upon efferocytosis of viable- versus HI-MSC. a Representative plots of CD14 versus CD16 of CD14 + monocytes after 24 h of efferocytosis of MSCs. Red gate = classical monocytes (CM), Blue gate = intermediate monocytes (IM), and Orange gate = non-classical monocytes (NCM). b Quantification of monocytes identified as CM, IM, or NCM (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 2-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). c CD86 versus CD163 representative plots of CM (red), IM (blue), and NCM (orange) subsets overlaid and associated histograms. d Quantification of CD86 MFI for CM, IM, and NCM. (Mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). e Quantification of CD163 MFI for CM, IM, and NCM. For the gating strategy, refer to Additional file 1: Figure S4. (Mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test)

Full size image

Efferocytosis of viable but not HI-MSCs by monocytes induces secretion of IL-10 and activation of IDO

To further gauge the functional phenotype of monocytes following efferocytosis of MSCs, we assayed monocytes secretory profile in the absence of T-cells (Fig. 5a). Isolated monocytes were cultured with viable or HI-MSCs for 24 h after which the samples were transferred to a new plate with new media. The monocytes were cultured for 2 additional days after which the media was assayed for IL-10, kynurenine, and TNF-α. Monocytes that efferocytosed viable MSCs showed large increases in IL-10 (Fig. 5b) and kynurenine (Fig. 5c) production compared to control and HI-MSC educated monocytes. Control and HI-MSC educated monocytes did not reach the limit of detection (LODIL-10 = 19 pg/mL, LODKyn = 7 µM). TNF-α was below the limit of detection (LODTNF-α = 15 pg/mL) for all conditions tested (data not shown). Notably, levels of IL-10, kynurenine, and TNF-α were all below the limit of detection for additional quality controls that included viable or HI-MSCs without monocytes (data not shown). Together, this data suggest that monocytes that have efferocytosed viable MSCs exhibit an anti-inflammatory secretory profile while HI-MSC educated monocytes behave similarly to naïve monocytes.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Efferocytosis of viable but not HI-MSCs by monocytes induces IL-10 secretion and activation of IDO. a Schematic of process used to negatively select monocytes. Non-monocytes were labeled with a cocktail of biotin-conjugated antibodies, then tagged with streptavidin MojoSort nanobeads, and pulled down with a magnet. Quantification of b IL-10 and c kynurenine production detected after 2-day monocyte culture without or with efferocytic-licensing by viable or HI-MSCs. LOD = Limit of Detection (LODIL-10 = 19 pg/mL, LODKyn = 7 µM, LODTNF-α = 15 pg/mL (data not shown))

Full size image

Human monocytes experience differential secretome shift after simulated sepsis stimulation depending on if they efferocytosed viable versus HI-MSC

Having established that efferocytosis increases the expression of immunosuppressive factors in naïve monocytes, we next wanted to determine if it impacted their immunoregulatory profile once stimulated with inflammatory mediators. Since viable and HI-MSCs have been shown to have efficacy in vivo in sepsis models [33, 49], we sought to simulate the activation monocytes see in the setting of sepsis. To mimic the inflammatory environment of sepsis, we added LPS, IFN-γ, and IL-2 during the 2-day isolated monocyte culture (Fig. 6a). After 2 days of activation, we observed very high levels of IL-10 with and without efferocytosis, but none of the conditions were significantly different from each other (Fig. 6b). Kynurenine production due to efferocytosis of viable MSCs was significantly increased compared to monocytes alone and monocytes that efferocytosed HI-MSCs (Fig. 6c). Interestingly, monocytes that efferocytosed either viable or HI-MSCs resulted in significant reduction in TNF-α compared to monocytes alone, but the monocytes that had efferocytosed HI-MSC had significantly less TNF-α compared to those that efferocytosed viable MSCs (Fig. 6d). These results suggest that efferocytosis of HI-MSCs by monocytes results in the monocytes adopting an immune-resolving profile within septic inflammatory environments and help explain prior observations that HI-MSC may be superior to viable MSC in the treatment of sepsis [33, 49].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Monocytes experience differential secretome shift after simulated sepsis stimulation dependent on MSC efferocytosis condition. a Schematic of isolated human monocyte efferocytic-licensing without and with viable- or HI-MSCs followed by simulated sepsis stimulation with IL-2, IFN-γ, and LPS. See Fig. 5a for monocyte isolation process. Quantification of b IL-10, c kynurenine, and d TNF-α production detected after 2-day sepsis stimulation without or with efferocytic-licensing with viable- or HI-MSCs (mean ± SEM, n = 3 independent experiments, *p < 0.05 calculated after 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test)

Full size image

Discussion

The journey toward widespread clinical use of MSCs has been slower and more challenging than most researchers and patients have hoped. Despite encouraging performance in numerous animal models and positive data in clinical trials, the approval of MSC therapies has been hampered by a lack of a complete understanding of MSCs mechanism of action. Without clearly defined mechanisms of action that correlate with clinical efficacy, the quality of MSCs from lot to lot cannot be verified. MSCs clearly exert immunosuppressive actions toward T-cells and monocytes via trophic factors, and these factors can be readily assessed in potency assays [10, 48, 51,52,53]. But are these the only, or even primary mechanisms of action at work in vivo? The limited in vivo persistence of MSCs coupled with the observed durability of MSC’s immunosuppressive effects suggest MSCs leave a lasting imprint on the host immune system, but how exactly?

Recently, efferocytosis has emerged as a potential mechanism of action exerted by MSCs on the host immune system that helps explain the durable effects of MSCs. To date, several groups have shown monocytes and macrophages uptake MSCs and this uptake is correlated with an anti-inflammatory profile [8, 18, 30, 32, 39, 54, 55]. Pang et al. [30] showed that apoptosis-resistant MSCs delayed onset of symptoms in an EAE model, but ultimately performed worse than non-resistant MSCs, suggesting apoptosis is important for the long-term immunosuppressive effects of MSCs. Meanwhile, Cheung et al. induced MSC apoptosis using an anti-Fas monoclonal antibody and found monocytes uptake the dying cells and take on an immunosuppressive phenotype [18]. While these studies provide evidence that efferocytosis is a potential mechanism, it raises the question, does the viability of MSC’s even matter and how robust is monocyte-mediated immunosuppression once the MSCs are removed? Answers to these questions have been mixed [56], with some studies showing viable MSCs are essential while others showing comparable or even superior effects when administering heat-inactivated MSCs (HI-MSCs). For example, viable MSCs prolonged lifespan of mice receiving allogeneic heart transplants compared to HI-MSCs [33] while in a sepsis model HI-MSCs significantly prolonged lifespan of mice compared to viable MSCs [33, 49]. This indicates that the condition of the MSCs at the time of administration has different therapeutic effects depending on the disease in question. In these in vivo studies, MSCs are delivered systemically and can, therefore, contribute both efferocytic and non-efferocytic mechanisms. Because both mechanisms are potentially active, it is difficult to tease apart which mechanism is directing immune modulation.

Here we took advantage of the flexibility and control afforded by in vitro systems to address these questions by using a variety of cell separation techniques to remove non-phagocytosed MSCs and isolate specific immune subsets. These techniques ranged from replating monocytes after efferocytosis in new wells to using antibody-conjugated magnetic beads to remove undesired cell populations and isolate our focus on the phenotype and function of monocytes after efferocytosis. In contrast to previous reports [18] that showed prior induction of apoptosis was essential for uptake by monocytes, we found human monocytes efficiently take up MSCs in a dose-dependent manner regardless of if they are viable or heat inactivated (Fig. 1). We saw very high levels of uptake at even modest ratios, with > 75% of monocytes uptaking MSCs in both conditions at an MSC:PBMC ratio of 1:40 (Fig. 1). In addition, we saw similarly efficient uptake even when the monocytes were first isolated from the PBMC population (Additional file 1: Figure S6), suggesting killing by cytotoxic T-cells is not required for monocytes to efferocytose MSCs. Importantly, in our studies we allowed efferocytosis to occur in non-adherent V-bottom plates to mimic the non-adherent conditions MSCs encounter in circulation with immune cells.

Having established that naïve primary human monocytes efficiently uptake both viable and HI-MSC, we next evaluated the monocytes through a series of assays to determine their immunologic profile. We found that uptake of viable-but not HI-MSC led monocytes to suppress T-cell activation (Fig. 2). While efferocytosis of viable MSCs by monocytes led to statistically significant T-cell suppression at MSC:PBMC ratios of 1:20, efferocytosis of HI-MSC never resulted in T-cell suppression. These observations agree with prior studies that assessed viable and HI-MSC effects on suppression of T-cells [33, 49]. Recognizing that the suppression observed in our study and those reported previously could be due to residual viable MSCs in the co-culture, we repeated the experiment with a novel additional step to remove residual MSCs using an anti-CD90 antibody depletion technique. Even after removal of residual MSCs, our observations still held showing that the efferocytically-licensed monocytes are responsible for the suppression of T-cells (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Figure S3). This provides some of the most direct evidence to date that efferocytic-licensing of monocytes leads to monocytes taking on an immunosuppressive phenotype toward T-cells in the absence of residual viable MSC. It also highlights that the quality of the MSC material has a direct impact on the functional phenotype of the monocyte after efferocytosis.

Interestingly, efferocytosis of both viable- and HI-MSC resulted in significant reduction in the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IFN-γ (Fig. 2E). Thus, we expanded our characterization beyond T-cell suppression by looking at surface marker expression. While it had been previously reported that efferocytosis leads to an increase in intermediate monocytes [39], in our hands we found only a modest non-significant increase in intermediate monocytes (Fig. 4a, b). While methodologies were similar, a key difference likely explains the discrepancy; while we analyzed monocyte surface markers changes after efferocytosis within complete PBMC cultures untouched by selection antibodies, previous studies used monocytes isolated using positive selection with a CD14 antibody [39]. Positive selection of monocytes with anti-CD14 antibodies has been shown to significantly skew monocyte and monocyte-derived macrophage phenotype [57, 58]. While we did not see shifts in CD14 and CD16, we did see significant shifts in the levels of both CD86 and CD163 (Fig. 4c). CD86 significantly increased in all monocytes after efferocytosis of viable MSC but only significantly in non-classical monocytes after efferocytosis of HI-MSC (Fig. 4d). The increase in CD86 was a surprise because it is traditionally considered a pro-inflammatory marker for M1 macrophages since it helps stimulate T-cell activation when it interacts with CD28; notably, however, CD86 also interacts with CTLA-4 to halt T-cell activation. While we did not explore the role of CD86 further in this study, CD86 could be a marker of interest for future investigation as it has dual pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory roles. CD163, on the other hand, significantly dropped in classical and intermediate monocytes only after efferocytosis of viable MSC (Fig. 4e). Previous studies have reported an increase in both CD163 and CD206 [39], which is in contrast to what we observed, again likely due to our use of untouched monocytes rather than anti-CD14 positively selected monocytes. We consistently observed a decrease in CD163 and no detectable CD206 above isotype control after efferocytosis of viable MSC. Collectively, this surface marker data show that monocytes take on divergent phenotypes depending on if they efferocytose viable- or HI-MSC, but the surface marker profiles both trend toward pro-inflammatory.

To explore the monocyte immunological landscape further, we assayed the secretion profile of viable and HI-MSC efferocytically-licensed monocytes both without and with a subsequent inflammatory stimulus designed to mimic sepsis. We observed that isolated naïve monocytes efferocytically-licensed with viable but not HI-MSCs had increased production of IL-10 and kynurenine and no detectable production of TNF-α (Fig. 5). This data showed that efferocytosis of viable MSCs by monocytes does indeed lead to an immune-resolving phenotype as evidenced by increased T-cell suppression and an increase in the production and activity of anti-inflammatory IL-10 and IDO, respectively. When the efferocytically-licensed monocytes were subsequently challenged with a cocktail of LPS, IFN-γ, and IL-2 to simulate sepsis, we saw IL-10 increase in all samples, but only monocytes efferocytically-licensed with viable MSC significantly increased output of kynurenine (Fig. 6). Both viable and HI-MSC efferocytically-licensed monocyte exhibited a significant reduction in TNF-α secretion, but, notably, the HI-MSC licensed monocytes had significantly more reduction in TNF-α than the viable MSC licensed monocytes. Prior studies have shown a similar reduction in TNF-α secretion, except that they had shown that treatment with viable MSCs tends to reduce TNF-α secretion more than HI-MSC [33, 49]. Importantly, in our study the monocytes were isolated using a negative selection kit and were re-plated after efferocytic-licensing to remove the majority of residual viable MSCs. In addition, we simulated sepsis using a cocktail of LPS, IFN-γ, and IL-2, whereas the prior studies used LPS alone.

It is clear that monocytes adopt distinctly immunosuppressive functionality in different inflammatory environments dependent on the type of MSC material they efferocytose; however, the overall phenotypic profile of the monocytes is complex. Surface marker characterization suggests relatively pro-inflammatory profiles for viable and HI-MSC efferocytically-licensed monocytes, yet secretory profiling suggests strong anti-inflammatory characteristics. These results reveal that monocytes adopt a mixed M1/M2 intermediate profile. Other studies of monocytes [59, 60], monocyte-derived dendritic cells [61, 62], and monocyte-derived macrophages [59, 60] have shown results consistent with ours regarding increased CD86 expression, IL-10 secretion, IDO activity, and decreased TNF-α secretion [59]. For example, Han et al. analyzed circulating CD14 + , CD86 + dendritic cells from human hepatocellular carcinoma patients and found they express high levels of IL-10 and IDO and were capable of suppressing T-cell proliferation [62]. Similarly, Zahorchak et al. found monocytes from peripheral blood could take on a CD86 + profile while producing high levels of IL-10 and low levels of TNF-α [61]. In vivo, monocytes are highly plastic cells that are very sensitive to stimuli and, thus, rarely partition strictly into M1 or M2 phenotypes, but rather fall on a spectrum from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory [63,64,65,66].

While this work adds to our understanding of MSC efferocytosis, several major questions remain. Studies to date on efferocytosis, including the present one, analyzed efferocytosis using naïve primary monocytes from healthy donors. If efferocytosis is a major mechanism of action for MSC therapies, how do host-factors influence the response to therapy? We know even co-morbid disease states like obesity dramatically alter the immune system [4], but how will they impact efferocytosis? In vivo, multiple mechanisms of action ranging from anoikis [67], to cytotoxic T-cell mediated lysis [68], to complement-mediated mechanisms can lead to MSC apoptosis [1, 69], but how the mechanism of apoptosis influences the efferocytic response of monocytes is yet to be determined within the context of MSC therapy. Furthermore, in the present study we compared viable and HI-MSC, but the variety of MSC products available today is highly diverse. MSCs are being manufactured using different culture systems, tissues of origin, and priming strategies [7], each of which could impact the efferocytic response. Finally, the discovery of efferocytosis as a mechanism does not rule out trophic factors as key mechanisms of action of MSC. Rather, it highlights that MSC therapies offer multiple mechanisms of action, and it is critical to understand which mechanisms are essential for specific disease indications [33].

Conclusions

Our understanding of MSC therapy has come a long way, from theories that MSCs are immune privileged, to the recognition that MSCs can be detected and cleared by the immune system [70], to the discovery that MSC clearance through efferocytosis is actually a critical aspect of their mechanism of action [71]. The current work used carefully designed in vitro studies to isolate monocyte efferocytosis of MSCs and provides evidence that efferocytosis of MSCs is a potent mechanism of action (Fig. 7), something that is difficult to tease apart in in vivo experiments. Additionally, the type of MSC material administered has considerable implications dependent on inflammatory states as we show with viable versus HI-MSC efferocytic-licensing conditions. The reality is likely that each disease offers a unique immunological challenge that requires different MSC mechanisms of action, and there is not a single silver bullet mechanism to explain all the effects of MSC-based therapies. The discovery of efferocytosis as a mechanism does not rule out trophic factors as key mechanisms of action of MSC. Rather, it highlights that MSC therapies offer multiple mechanisms of action, and it is critical to understand which mechanisms are essential for specific disease indications. Therefore, it is imperative that we continue to explore the numerous ways in which MSCs interact with immune cells to evaluate their potency, customize MSC therapies for specific disease applications, and identify patients most likely to benefit.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Monocyte phenotype and function depends on the initial viability of MSCs they efferocytose. Efferocytosis of viable MSC generated monocytes with increased expression of CD86, IDO activity, and immunosuppression toward T-cells. Efferocytosis of HI-MSC generated monocytes capable of decreasing total TNF-α production in simulated sepsis. This work highlights the importance of MSC quality, even for efferocytic mechanisms

Full size image

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

Anti-Fas:

CD95L, i.e., CD178

BCL-2:

B-cell lymphoma 2

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CBO:

CellBrite Orange

CFSE:

Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester

CM:

Classical monocyte

CTLA-4:

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, i.e., CD152

DI:

Deionized

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

Dynabeads:

Anti-CD3/CD28 T cell activation dynabeads

EAE:

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ELISA:

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

Fc:

Fragment crystallizable antibody region

FSC:

Forward-scatter

GvHD:

Graft-versus-host disease

HI:

Heat-inactivated/inactivation

Hi:

High expression

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

IDO:

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

IFN-γ:

Interferon γ

IL-10:

Interleukin 10

IL-2:

Interleukin 2

IM:

Intermediate monocyte

Int:

Intermediate expression

Kyn:

Kynurenine

Lo:

Low expression

LOD:

Limit of detection

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

LRC:

Leukocyte reduction cone

M1:

Pro-inflammatory monocyte/macrophage

M2:

Anti-inflammatory monocyte/macrophage

MEM-α:

Minimum Essential Medium α

MLR:

Mixed lymphocyte reaction

MSC:

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell

NCM:

Non-classical monocyte

PBMC:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PGE-2:

Prostaglandin E2

RBC:

Red blood cell

RPMI:

Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

SSC:

Side-scatter

TCA:

Trichloroacetic acid

TMB:

3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor α

TSG-6:

Tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene 6

References

  1. Moll G, Ankrum JA, Kamhieh-Milz J, Bieback K, Ringdén O, Volk H-D, et al. Intravascular mesenchymal stromal/stem cell therapy product diversification: time for new clinical guidelines. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25:149–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ankrum J, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy: two steps forward, one step back. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16(203):209.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levy O, Kuai R, Siren EMJ, Bhere D, Milton Y, Nissar N, et al. Shattering barriers toward clinically meaningful MSC therapies. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba6884.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Boland L, Bitterlich LM, Hogan AE, Ankrum JA, English K. Translating MSC therapy in the age of obesity. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 943333.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Leng Z, Zhu R, Hou W, Feng Y, Yang Y, Han Q, et al. Transplantation of ACE2-mesenchymal stem cells improves the outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Aging Dis. 2020;11:216–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Enes SR, Krasnodembskaya AD, English K, Santos CCD, Weiss DJ. Research progress on strategies that can enhance the therapeutic benefits of mesenchymal stromal cells in respiratory diseases with a specific focus on acute respiratory distress syndrome and other inflammatory lung diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 647652.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yin JQ, Zhu J, Ankrum JA. Manufacturing of primed mesenchymal stromal cells for therapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;1.

  8. Galipeau J. Macrophages at the nexus of mesenchymal stromal cell potency: The emerging role of chemokine cooperativity. Stem Cells. 2021;39:1145–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galipeau J, Sensebé L. Mesenchymal stromal cells: clinical challenges and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(824):833.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chinnadurai R, Rajan D, Qayed M, Arafat D, Garcia M, Liu Y, et al. Potency analysis of mesenchymal stromal cells using a combinatorial assay matrix approach. Cell Rep. 2018;22(2504):2517.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samsonraj RM, Raghunath M, Nurcombe V, Hui JH, van Wijnen AJ, Cool SM. Concise review: multifaceted characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells for use in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Transl Med. 2017;6:2173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sivanathan KN, Rojas-Canales DM, Hope CM, Krishnan R, Carroll RP, Gronthos S, et al. Interleukin-17A-induced human mesenchymal stem cells are superior modulators of immunological function. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio). 2015;33(2850):2863.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Casado JG, Tarazona R, Sanchez-Margallo FM. NK and MSCs crosstalk: the sense of immunomodulation and their sensitivity. Stem Cell Reviews. 2013;9(184):189.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ankrum J, Dastidar RG, Ong JF, Levy O, Karp JM. Performance-enhanced mesenchymal stem cells via intracellular delivery of steroids. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4645.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyt DT, Boland LK, Burand AJ, Brown AJ, Ankrum JA. Dose and duration of interferon γ pre-licensing interact with donor characteristics to influence the expression and function of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase in mesenchymal stromal cells. J R Soc Interface. 2020;17:20190815.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Németh K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PST, Mayer B, Parmelee A, Doi K, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E2–dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med. 2009;15:42–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burand AJ, Di L, Boland LK, Boyt DT, Schrodt MV, Santillan DA, et al. Aggregation of human mesenchymal stromal cells eliminates their ability to suppress human T cells. Front Immunol. 2020;11:143.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung TS, Galleu A, von Bonin M, Bornhäuser M, Dazzi F. Apoptotic mesenchymal stromal cells induce prostaglandin E2 in monocytes: implications for the monitoring of mesenchymal stromal cell activity. Haematologica. 2019;104:e438–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartosh TJ, Ylostalo JH, Bazhanov N, Kuhlman J, Prockop DJ. Dynamic compaction of human mesenchymal stem/precursor cells into spheres self-activates caspase-dependent IL1 signaling to enhance secretion of modulators of inflammation and immunity (PGE2, TSG6, and STC1). Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio). 2013;31(2443):2456.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ko JH, Lee HJ, Jeong HJ, Kim MK, Wee WR, Yoon S-O, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells precondition lung monocytes/macrophages to produce tolerance against allo- and autoimmunity in the eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;113:158–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sala E, Genua M, Petti L, Anselmo A, Arena V, Cibella J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reduce colitis in mice via release of TSG6, independently of their localization to the intestine. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:163-176.e20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee RH, Pulin AA, Seo MJ, Kota DJ, Ylostalo J, Larson BL, et al. Intravenous hMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(54):63.

    Google Scholar 

  23. He Y, Zhou S, Liu H, Shen B, Zhao H, Peng K, et al. Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxgenase transfected mesenchymal stem cells induce kidney allograft tolerance by increasing the production and function of regulatory T cells. Transplantation. 2015;99:1829–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ge W, Jiang J, Arp J, Liu W, Garcia B, Wang H. Regulatory T-cell generation and kidney allograft tolerance induced by mesenchymal stem cells associated with indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression. Transplantation. 2010;90:1312–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oh JY, Lee RH, Yu JM, Ko JH, Lee HJ, Ko AY, et al. Intravenous mesenchymal stem cells prevented rejection of allogeneic corneal transplants by aborting the early inflammatory response. Mol Ther. 2012;20:2143–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J, Liu Y, Ding H, Shi X, Ren H. Mesenchymal stem cell-secreted prostaglandin E2 ameliorates acute liver failure via attenuation of cell death and regulation of macrophage polarization. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Eggenhofer E, Benseler V, Kroemer A, Popp FC, Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are short-lived and do not migrate beyond the lungs after intravenous infusion. Front Immunol. 2012;3:297.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee RH, Pulin AA, Seo MJ, Kota DJ, Ylostalo J, Larson BL, et al. Intravenous hMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:54–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dang S, Xu H, Xu C, Cai W, Li Q, Cheng Y, et al. Autophagy regulates the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Autophagy. 2014;10:1301–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pang SHM, D’Rozario J, Mendonca S, Bhuvan T, Payne NL, Zheng D, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell apoptosis is required for their therapeutic function. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6495.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Braza F, Dirou S, Forest V, Sauzeau V, Hassoun D, Chesné J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells induce suppressive macrophages through phagocytosis in a mouse model of asthma. Stem Cells. 2016;34:1836–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Galleu A, Riffo-Vasquez Y, Trento C, Lomas C, Dolcetti L, Cheung TS, et al. Apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cells induces in vivo recipient-mediated immunomodulation. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaam7828.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weiss ARR, Lee O, Eggenhofer E, Geissler E, Korevaar SS, Soeder Y, et al. Differential effects of heat-inactivated, secretome-deficient MSC and metabolically active MSC in sepsis and allogenic heart transplantation. Stem Cells. 2020;38:797–807.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tan Y, Salkhordeh M, Wang J-P, McRae A, Souza-Moreira L, McIntyre L, et al. Thawed mesenchymal stem cell product shows comparable immunomodulatory potency to cultured cells in vitro and in polymicrobial septic animals. Sci Rep-uk. 2019;9:18078.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Burand AJ, Gramlich OW, Brown AJ, Ankrum J. Function of cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells with and without interferon-γ prelicensing is context dependent. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio). 2017;35(1437):1439.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ge W, Jiang J, Baroja ML, Arp J, Zassoko R, Liu W, et al. Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells and rapamycin synergize to attenuate alloimmune responses and promote cardiac allograft tolerance. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1760–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maharlooei MK, Bagheri M, Solhjou Z, Jahromi BM, Akrami M, Rohani L, et al. Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cell (AD-MSC) promotes skin wound healing in diabetic rats. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(228):234.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Umar S, de Visser YP, Steendijk P, Schutte CI, Laghmani EH, Wagenaar GTM, et al. Allogenic stem cell therapy improves right ventricular function by improving lung pathology in rats with pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol-heart C. 2009;297:H1606–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. de Witte SFH, Luk F, Parraga JMS, Gargesha M, Merino A, Korevaar SS, et al. Immunomodulation by therapeutic mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) is triggered through phagocytosis of MSC by monocytic cells. Stem Cells. 2018;36:602–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheung TS, Galleu A, Bonin M von, Bornhäuser M, Dazzi F. Apoptotic mesenchymal stromal cells induce prostaglandin E2 in monocytes: implications for the monitoring of mesenchymal stromal cells activity. Haematologica. 2019;104:haematol.2018.214767.

  41. Elliott MR, Koster KM, Murphy PS. Efferocytosis signaling in the regulation of macrophage inflammatory responses. J Immunol. 2017;198:1387–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Elliott MR, Ravichandran KS. The dynamics of apoptotic cell clearance. Dev Cell. 2016;38:147–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Boada-Romero E, Martinez J, Heckmann BL, Green DR. The clearance of dead cells by efferocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2020;21:398–414.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Green DR, Oguin TH, Martinez J. The clearance of dying cells: table for two. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23:915–26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Weiss DJ, English K, Krasnodembskaya A, Isaza-Correa JM, Hawthorne IJ, Mahon BP. The necrobiology of mesenchymal stromal cells affects therapeutic efficacy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1228.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Zheng D, Bhuvan T, Payne NL, Heng TSP. Secondary lymphoid organs in mesenchymal stromal cell therapy: more than just a filter. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 892443.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wagoner ZW, Zhao W. Therapeutic implications of transplanted-cell death. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5:379–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Galipeau J, Krampera M, Leblanc K, Nolta JA, Phinney DG, Shi Y, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell variables influencing clinical potency: the impact of viability, fitness, route of administration and host predisposition. Cytotherapy. 2021;23:368–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Luk F, de Witte SFH, Korevaar SS, Rhijn MR, Franquesa M, Strini T, et al. Inactivated mesenchymal stem cells maintain immunomodulatory capacity. Stem Cells Dev. 2016;25:1342–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Boland LK, Burand AJ, Boyt DT, Dobroski H, Di L, Liszewski JN, et al. Nature vs. nurture: defining the effects of mesenchymal stromal cell isolation and culture conditions on resiliency to palmitate challenge. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1080.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ribeiro A, Ritter T, Griffin M, Ceredig R. Development of a flow cytometry-based potency assay for measuring the in vitro immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Immunol Lett. 2016;177(38):46.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Galipeau J, Krampera M, Barrett J, Dazzi F, Deans RJ, DeBruijn J, et al. International Society for Cellular Therapy perspective on immune functional assays for mesenchymal stromal cells as potency release criterion for advanced phase clinical trials. Cytotherapy. 2016;18(151):159.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marklein RA, Klinker MW, Drake KA, Polikowsky HG, Lessey-Morillon EC, Bauer SR. Morphological profiling using machine learning reveals emergent subpopulations of interferon-γ-stimulated mesenchymal stromal cells that predict immunosuppression. Cytotherapy. 2019;21:17–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Piraghaj MG, Soudi S, Ghanbarian H, Bolandi Z, Namaki S, Hashemi SM. Effect of efferocytosis of apoptotic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on C57BL/6 peritoneal macrophages function. Life Sci. 2018;212:203–12.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Min H, Xu L, Parrott R, Overall CC, Lillich M, Rabjohns EM, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells reprogram monocytes and macrophages with processing bodies. Stem Cells. 2021;39:115–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Weiss ARR, Dahlke MH. Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): mechanisms of action of living, apoptotic, and dead MSCs. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1191.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Bhattacharjee J, Das B, Mishra A, Sahay P, Upadhyay P. Monocytes isolated by positive and negative magnetic sorting techniques show different molecular characteristics and immunophenotypic behaviour. F1000research. 2017;6:2045.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nielsen MC, Andersen MN, Møller HJ. Monocyte isolation techniques significantly impact the phenotype of both isolated monocytes and derived macrophages in vitro. Immunology. 2020;159:63–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vasandan AB, Jahnavi S, Shashank C, Prasad P, Kumar A, Prasanna SJ. Human Mesenchymal stem cells program macrophage plasticity by altering their metabolic status via a PGE2-dependent mechanism. Sci Rep-uk. 2016;6:38308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Porta C, Rimoldi M, Raes G, Brys L, Ghezzi P, Liberto DD, et al. Tolerance and M2 (alternative) macrophage polarization are related processes orchestrated by p50 nuclear factor κB. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:14978–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Zahorchak AF, Macedo C, Hamm DE, Butterfield LH, Metes DM, Thomson AW. High PD-L1/CD86 MFI ratio and IL-10 secretion characterize human regulatory dendritic cells generated for clinical testing in organ transplantation. Cell Immunol. 2018;323:9–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Han Y, Chen Z, Yang Y, Jiang Z, Gu Y, Liu Y, et al. Human CD14+CTLA-4+ regulatory dendritic cells suppress T-cell response by cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4-dependent IL-10 and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase production in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2014;59:567–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:958–69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Cignarella A, Tedesco S, Cappellari R, Fadini GP. The continuum of monocyte phenotypes: experimental evidence and prognostic utility in assessing cardiovascular risk. J Leukocyte Biol. 2018;103:1021–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gurvich OL, Puttonen KA, Bailey A, Kailaanmäki A, Skirdenko V, Sivonen M, et al. Transcriptomics uncovers substantial variability associated with alterations in manufacturing processes of macrophage cell therapy products. Sci Rep-uk. 2020;10:14049.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Santulli-Marotto S, Gervais A, Fisher J, Strake B, Ogden CA, Riveley C, et al. Discovering molecules that regulate efferocytosis using primary human macrophages and high content imaging. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0145078.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Copland IB, Lord-Dufour S, Cuerquis J, Coutu DL, Annabi B, Wang E, et al. Improved autograft survival of mesenchymal stromal cells by plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 inhibition. Stem Cells. 2009;27:467–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Chinnadurai R, Copland IB, Garcia MA, Petersen CT, Lewis CN, Waller EK, et al. Cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells are susceptible to T-cell mediated apoptosis which is partly rescued by IFNγ licensing. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2429–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Moll G, Ankrum JA, Olson SD, Nolta JA. Improved MSC minimal criteria to maximize patient safety: a call to embrace tissue factor and hemocompatibility assessment of MSC products. Stem Cell Transl Med. 2022;11:2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ankrum JA, Ong JF, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: immune evasive, not immune privileged. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:252–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Giacomini C, Granéli C, Hicks R, Dazzi F. The critical role of apoptosis in mesenchymal stromal cell therapeutics and implications in homeostasis and normal tissue repair. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;1–13.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We also acknowledge the University of Iowa Tissue Procurement Core which manages the University of Iowa Biobank (UIBB—IRB#201103721) for services provided related to the acquisition of study specimens. The TPC is supported by an award from NIH (NCI award number P30CA086862) and the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine. The following Bioicons images were used as templates to make the schematics in Figs. 2a, 3a, 6a, and the graphical abstract: fibrocyte-3, fibroblast-4, microtube-open-translucent, tube-screwcap-closed-green, monocyte-15, lymphoid-stem-cell, lymphoid-stem-cell, and antibody-1 by Servier https://smart.servier.com/ are licensed under CC-BY 3.0 Unported https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

Funding

This work was funded primarily with support from the Straub Foundation and the Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation to JAA. Additional support came from NIH P42 ES013661 (JAA). RBB and L.B. were supported in part by the University of Iowa MSTP Grant, NIH T32 GM139776. JL was supported by a Carver Biomedical Engineering PhD Fellowship from the Roy J. Carver Trust. The funding agencies played no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52245, USA

    Michael V. Schrodt, Riley M. Behan-Bush, Jesse N. Liszewski, Madeleine E. Humpal-Pash, Lauren K. Boland & James A. Ankrum

  2. Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52245, USA

    Michael V. Schrodt, Riley M. Behan-Bush, Jesse N. Liszewski, Madeleine E. Humpal-Pash, Lauren K. Boland & James A. Ankrum

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Sabrina M. Scroggins & Donna A. Santillan

  4. Center for Immunology and Immune Based Diseases, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Sabrina M. Scroggins & Donna A. Santillan

  5. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Immunology, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Duluth, MN, USA

    Sabrina M. Scroggins & Donna A. Santillan

  6. 103 S. Capitol St., 5621 SC, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    James A. Ankrum

Authors
  1. Michael V. Schrodt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Riley M. Behan-Bush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jesse N. Liszewski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Madeleine E. Humpal-Pash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lauren K. Boland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sabrina M. Scroggins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Donna A. Santillan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. James A. Ankrum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization was contributed by MS, LB, JA; methodology was contributed by MS, LB, JA, SS, DS; formal analysis was contributed by MS, LB, JA; investigation was contributed by MS, RB, JL, LB, MH; resources was contributed by DS, JA; data curation was contributed by MS; writing—original draft, was contributed by MS, JA; writing—review and editing, was contributed by MS, JA, RB, JL, MH, LB; visualization was contributed by MS; supervision was contributed by JA; funding acquisition was contributed by JA.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Ankrum.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

MSCs were isolated from human umbilical cord collected from the University of Iowa Women's Health Tissue Repository's Maternal Fetal Tissue Bank with written informed consent from the mothers (IRB#200910784; “The University of Iowa Tissue Procurement Core Biorepository”; Approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board October 2009). PBMCs from de-identified donors were isolated from a leukapheresis reduction cone made available by the DeGowin Blood Center at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Prior to collection, donors give informed consent for use of the cells for research purposes in accordance with IRB#201103721 (“The University of Iowa Biobank”; Approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board March 2011).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Availability of data and materials

All data are presented in the paper within the main and supplemental figures. Raw or unprocessed forms of the data are available upon request via email to james-ankrum@uiowa.edu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Figure S1:

Heat-inactivation sets MSCs on a path toward apoptosis (related to Figure 1). Figure S2: Residual Non-phagocytosed viable MSC spheroids were transferred from 24hr efferocytic-licensing to T-cell activation plates (related to Figure 2). Figure S3: MSC depletion efficiency and dose-dependent immunomodulatory potency of healthy adherent MSC toward activated T-cells (related to Figure 3). Figure S4: Gating strategy for surface marker analysis of monocytes following MSC efferocytosis. Figure S5: CD206 expression of CD14+ monocytes without and with viable MSC efferocytic-licensing (related to Figure 4). Figure S6: Monocyte isolation is efficient and isolated monocytes phagocytose viable and HI-MSCs in the absence of Tcells (related to Figure 1).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schrodt, M.V., Behan-Bush, R.M., Liszewski, J.N. et al. Efferocytosis of viable versus heat-inactivated MSC induces human monocytes to distinct immunosuppressive phenotypes. Stem Cell Res Ther 14, 206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03443-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03443-z

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512